On 05/25/2009 12:25 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Submitters: Please go through all the open bugs you have submitted. If
>
> BTW, if there's any guidance for the test team in Bxl on how to tag
> the bugs found against latest SoaS, we'll be
Summary: There seems to already be Sugar 0.84 content translated into
various languages on flossmanuals.net that someone could "remix" as
HTML and link to from the Browse activity's home page.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> We talked a bit about the Help Activity in Par
Hi Pierre,
On 26 May 2009, at 02:24, Pierre Métras wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I've read in a recent post in the Sugar IAEP list where you
> explained how to
> make an activity adopted by the Activity Team. Are you part of this
> team or
> how can I contact them without having to create a new accou
Hi Caroline,
Caroline Meeks writes:
> We talked a bit about the Help Activity in Paris. I've taken our discussion
> and written it up here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Help
>
> Please take a look and edit this spec and start to think about how it should
> be
> implemented.
Thanks
Tomeu Vizoso writes:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 13:31, Bastien wrote:
>> +1 on the overall.
>>
>> Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
>>
>> ,
>> | ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
>> | ~$ ./configure
>> | ~$ make
>> | ~$ sudo make install
>> `
>
> Well, that
Hi Martin,
On 25 May 2009, at 20:24, Marten Vijn wrote:
> Following http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/Getting_Involved
>
> 1. User:Marten refers to me
> 2. my public_key is in User:Marten
> 3. I am on Activity Team/Contacts (I was not sure to me add meself)
Welcome aboard!
> 4. For the
Well the main thing here is about demoing... I've taken it upon myself to
package about 50 activities... including fructose and glucose... now... we
have things like flash which isnt an xo bundle, though many people believe
it could/should be, and that would/should be considered a honey app, but it
Following http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Team/Getting_Involved
1. User:Marten refers to me
2. my public_key is in User:Marten
3. I am on Activity Team/Contacts (I was not sure to me add meself)
4. For the people that don't know me yet
Hi I am Marten, I live in Leiden, The Netherland. I hav
On 25 May 2009, at 12:33, David Van Assche wrote:
> Super... that methodology should be written up some place as its a
> great guide to follow...
I'd much rather try and find some agreement to cut un-necessary steps,
rather than to wikify/formalise it and push every unfortunate Activity
aut
On 05/25/2009 11:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> Tomeu was quicker in his response than me...
>
> As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in
> regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the
> Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora
>
[...]
>>> That's why people are barking at the wrong tree when they say that
>>> Sugar developers should port Sugar to whatever system. The skills
>>> involved are very different from upstream work and if coders are not
>>> coding we won't have anything new to ship.
>>>
>> If barking ever applies m
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 16:25, Marten Vijn wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> [adding sugar-devel again to CC]
>>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, N
Am Montag, den 25.05.2009, 12:17 +0200 schrieb Bernie Innocenti:
> [cc += cwickert]
>
> On 05/25/09 12:10, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> >> wrote:
> >>> The only thing I didn't like very much is mem
I'd just like to be able to find ONE place to go to that would list the correct
version
of each activity FOR EACH RELEASE OF THE PLATFORM. Knowing that version 554
of stump-the-wumpus is the latest does me no good if I need a version no newer
than 357
in order to run it under 8.2.1 on my XO. Si
On 05/25/2009 11:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 16:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Dear Sugar Community,
>>
>> After the dust of the 0.84 release has been settled we like to clean up
>> the database. With each new Sucrose release comes some bug tracker
>> housekeeping. This e-
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> [adding sugar-devel again to CC]
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC wrote:
> >>
> >> Just copying files is unlikely
Hi,
We talked a bit about the Help Activity in Paris. I've taken our discussion
and written it up here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Help
Please take a look and edit this spec and start to think about how it should
be implemented.
It may not be worth translating it before it is rewr
On 05/25/09 12:18, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> matchbox, according to ps_mem.py is 2.5MiB (private) + 430.5
> MiB(shared) with Browse.xo and Terminal.xo open on my development XO
> after 3 days uptime.
>
> 'top' says 9644 RSS, 5436 Res, but the more I use the smap data
> (parsed by ps_mem.py) the les
I have tried the appliance image on VirtualBox.
On the registration form it crashed with some python? error (will look
the exact error if it is not a well known bug). It could be caused that
I clicked more than once to the Next button.
After that I only have an "Automatic login" user to choose f
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Submitters: Please go through all the open bugs you have submitted. If
BTW, if there's any guidance for the test team in Bxl on how to tag
the bugs found against latest SoaS, we'll be happy to follow...
This search shows most (all?) the
[cc += cwickert]
On 05/25/09 12:10, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>> The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
>>> RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it.
>>
>>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Openbox, the window manager used by LXDE and other desktops, is only
> slightly cheaper: 7.5MB RSS.
>
> IMHO, not worth the pain of being out of the mainstream.
matchbox, according to ps_mem.py is 2.5MiB (private) + 430.5
MiB(shared) wit
On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
>> RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it.
>
> Ugh. That's a ton for a wm :-( Are there alternatives that "fit" be
Tomeu was quicker in his response than me...
As Simon said, the current plan for *both* the XO-1 and the XO-1.5 in
regard to Sugar support is to build upon the work that OLPC and the
Fedora communities are doing towards getting a stock Fedora
distribution running on the hardware. Sugar would be pa
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 16:54, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Dear Sugar Community,
>
> After the dust of the 0.84 release has been settled we like to clean up
> the database. With each new Sucrose release comes some bug tracker
> housekeeping. This e-mail is designed to let you know about the things
>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC wrote:
>
>>
>> I hope this anwers your question,
>> Simon
>>
>>
>
> Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able
> to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so
> it is a working Linux distribution. If
>
> I hope this anwers your question,
>Simon
>
>
Unfortunately it does not. What I wanted to know whether I will be able
to use the latest Sugar on my XO-1 ever. It boots the kernel with 802 so
it is a working Linux distribution. If somehow I copy the latest Sugar
over the old Sugar (0.82
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
> RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it.
Ugh. That's a ton for a wm :-( Are there alternatives that "fit" better?
m
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@
On 05/25/09 09:48, Brian Jordan wrote:
> Is anyone against retiring the activit...@lists.laptop.org list in
> favor of migration to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org?
+1.
I think platform developers should be aware of the challenges of
activity writers, and vice-versa.
--
// Bernie Innocenti -
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 13:31, Bastien wrote:
> +1 on the overall.
>
> Building Sugar from source should be as easy as:
>
> ,
> | ~$ git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-core/mainline.git
> | ~$ ./configure
> | ~$ make
> | ~$ sudo make install
> `
Well, that works for the sugar shell provided yo
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:42, S Page wrote:
> There are a dozen dictionary extensions for Firefox, do any of those
> work in Browse?
> http://www.dailyblogtips.com/dictionary-extensions-for-firefox/ and
> comments mention a few.
Extensions that don't use anything firefox-specific can be used in
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 21:30, Lucian Branescu
wrote:
> Perhaps Maximus from Ubuntu netbook remix may help with emulating
> matchbox behaviour? https://launchpad.net/maximus
We have a trade-off to take into account here between memory usage of
maximus and the cost of implementation and maintenanc
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 20:04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>On 05/23/09 19:16, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>> I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu.
Is anyone against retiring the activit...@lists.laptop.org list in
favor of migration to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org?
Brian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 24 May 2009, at 18:36, Brian Jordan wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Gary -- when you get a chance, can you add me as a committer on
>> git.sl.o? I'd like to help clean things up!
>
> You're added! :-)
>
> Can I request we try and
On 24.05.2009, at 03:56, S Page wrote:
> Etoys at 94, but its web page's Activity_version says 98
> ==> Someone should update http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
> !?
> ==> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addons/versions/4030
> is up to 100, but doesn't list a versi
36 matches
Mail list logo
