sk if code could be added to the program to prevent the
tracking cookies from being added. While they might be regularly updated, it
seems like there should be some commonality that could be detected and
prevented.
Thank you.
Larry Bush
l...@at
Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the
user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours,
which does).
Please follow what I said ...
We both Can see what the other is seeing on those
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the
user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours,
which does).
Please follow what I said ...
We both Can see what the
Bush wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the
user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours,
which does).
Please follow what I said ...
We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites
David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the
user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours,
which does).
Please follow what I said ...
We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites ...
They say
David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
So now I am puzzled by what Bush is telling us about his wife's
computer.
About WHAT ?
Simple ... I went to my wifes computer and pulled up the About
Seamonkey and it Showed she was using 1.1.14 and her computer can view
the sites that Seamonke
David Wilkinson wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/1/2009 3:38 AM, David Wilkinson wrote:
Bush wrote:
Read my other post and you will see my wifes computer Has seamonkey
1.1.14 on it and the Tvguide site loads great ... The program
discription works great .
here is her ABOUT SEAMONKEY
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/30/2009 6:35 PM, Bush wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work
in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you
click on a show it will display a opening that show a description.
However
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote:
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
/snip/
general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7
AHA!!
Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work
in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if
you
click on a show it will display a opening that show a
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote:
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No
problems with Certificates
Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention
to what you've been
just show a blank.
The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx
Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA
is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that.
SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case.
I get the same
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work
in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if
you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description.
However, in Seamonkey if just
NoOp wrote:
On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote:
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems
with Certificates
Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to
what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing)
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No
problems with Certificates
Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to
what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say y
Danny Kile wrote:
Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work
in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you
click on a show it will display a opening that show a description.
However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank.
The link is: http://w
Graham wrote:
Bush wrote:
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems
with Certificates
Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to
what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made
the best choice
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote:
Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that
error Happen ?
As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that
the method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate .
Windows
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote:
Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that error
Happen ?
As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that the
method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate .
Windows 7 Pro and
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
/snip/
On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help > About SeaMonkey].
Under the large-type link for "SeaMonkey 1.1.18" at
the top of
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:51:51 -0600, u...@domain.invalid in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
See the la
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
The funny thing is, I am
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Here is the fix
#1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA
#2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18
And the site is Viewable
But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again
Bush wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
I am now back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 ... I uninstalled the Beta version of 2.x
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of
the
TABS.
I have
Bush wrote:
Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their
Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/
certificates/ manage certificates .
What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security
/validation ...
I got ris of seamonkey 2.0
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:29 -0500, Bush in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey
2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA
Time for me to go back to 1.1.18
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box
shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this
message and why won't my mail go out?
I think we both are in the same situation as far sa seamonkey 2.0 ..
Time to go Back
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops
up an box saying:
Sending of message failed.
An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server
mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but
you have cho
Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their
Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/
certificates/ manage certificates .
What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security
/validation ...
_
ST wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone else having trouble viewing breitbart pages. Mine comes up
with about 1/2 inch of the article visible on the right side of the
page. I can see about two letters of an article showing below the "h"
in the word Search at the top of the page.
The top headings are in thei
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other
sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or
Win 7 pro
_
donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not
Bush wrote:
Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other
sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or
Win 7 pro
_
donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/27/2009 8:16 PM, Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/27/2009 9:51 AM, JAS wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site
with no
Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other
sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0
or Win 7 pro
_
donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
tr
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/27/2009 9:51 AM, JAS wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site
with no problem.
JAS
This is an obvious case of faulty browser
JAS wrote:
Bush wrote:
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site
with no problem.
JAS
Win 7
Win 7 pro and seamonkey 2.0 and the site doesnot Work... I was able to
view the site
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/25/2009 6:40 PM, Bush wrote:
Cannot download Quicktime plugin
Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ?
>
swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
trusted.
Error c
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:40:44 -0500, /Bush/:
Cannot download Quicktime plugin
Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ?
swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
trusted.
Error
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Bush wrote:
Bush wrote:
Cannot download Quicktime plugin
Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ?
swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
trusted.
Error code
Bush wrote:
Cannot download Quicktime plugin
Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ?
swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
trusted.
Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer)
http
Cannot download Quicktime plugin
Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ?
swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not
trusted.
Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer)
http://support.apple.com/downlo
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences->Advanced->Cache->Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one wit
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Bush wrote:
Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp
only some post from you are Blank..
all other post from others
in this newsgroup has Text in the message box .
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences->Advanced->Cache->Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one wit
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences->Advanced->Cache->Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one without body.
Does this help?
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers
to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ?
Try Preferences->Advanced->Cache->Clear Cache, then select another
posting and then go back to the one without body.
Does this help?
Hartmut
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
This post was Blank
What post? Your headers show no reference header:
Path:
Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for
Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Perhaps you missed my post this morning on "Att/Seamonkey/ssl -
UPDATE"?
most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so
ever .
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Perhaps you missed my post this morning on "Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE"?
most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever .
That may
NoOp wrote:
This post was Blank
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Perhaps you missed my post this morning on "Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE"?
most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever .
That may sometimes happen when you try to load a
u...@domain.invalid wrote:
I installed seamonky 2 on a computer with win7 on it. I would like to
copy the mozilla folder in the documents and settings\user\ folder. But
on windows7 it dosnt have a documents and settings folder anymore. Where
do I put the mozilla folder on win7 so I can keep all m
Lee wrote:
Bush wrote:
My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me .
Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck
was going on much less of any help.
Took me to Web mail... and it Worked so they Said it was not their
problem since Webmail worked ..
pop.att.yahoo.com
Bush wrote:
Lee wrote:
Bush wrote:
Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on
att Suddenly get SSL back?.
Well it works for me after all those earlier problems.
My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me .
Forgot to Add .. Tech Support Said it Was a
Lee wrote:
Bush wrote:
Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on
att Suddenly get SSL back?.
Well it works for me after all those earlier problems.
My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me .
___
support
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL
NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote:
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with
Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech
suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I
do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with
Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups
Has everyone else
norm wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
"could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused". This will happen for
Paul wrote:
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues ,
They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl)
but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users
must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-se
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an AT&T WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an AT&T WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they
Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port
110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
This is True With this
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of
the
TABS.
I have
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the
TABS.
I have unchecked every
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the
TABS.
I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Bush wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the
TABS.
I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences .
Do I
have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ?
I haven&#
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 15.11.2009 19:02, Bush wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS.
I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences .
Do I
have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Bush:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS.
I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I
have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ?
I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings:
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS.
I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I
have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@list
Jim wrote:
I'm extremely disappointed in Seamonkey 2.0. The mail program bugs
are too severe to warrant continued use. I've come to expect better
from Mozilla releases. I didn't use Firefox or Thunderbird because I
didn't like the "feel" and they weren't integrated as a suite. Now
Seamonkey h
stan wrote:
If I restore my system to a few days back, will it also restore SM to a
few days back?
Stan
Yes ...
The only problem I notice with Sysytem Restore is That It Does not
Restore MY DOCUMENTS directory . At least this is my experience .My
documents comes Back as an Empty Directory
Bush wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/4/2009 5:20 PM, stan wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Hi all,
Today, the SeaMonkey project released a new version of its
all-in-one internet suite. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 closes several security
vulnerabilities and fixes a few smaller problems found in previous
David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/4/2009 5:20 PM, stan wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Hi all,
Today, the SeaMonkey project released a new version of its all-in-one
internet suite. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 closes several security vulnerabilities
and fixes a few smaller problems found in previous versions. With
Phillip Jones wrote:
Hello, it been a while I vowed never to come back to this forum except
to ask a question. I remain true to my vow. I am asking a question
I have a puzzle.
examine this page with SM 1.1.17:
http://villageelectronicsservice.com/VacationSchedule.aspx
Now use: SM 2, FF3.0/3.
bern...@nospam.com wrote:
Anyone else having problems with cnn.com displaying properly with 1.1.16
It was fine but something changed. It displays correctly with Internet
Explorer. Any ideas?
Thanks
Bernie
No problems here . Win Xp
___
support-seamonk
Henry wrote:
I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine. Until yesterday
when I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would
show and I could open the attachment. Starting yesterday, when I got an
email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would show but
Lee wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
So have you done all that and it isn't working are do you have
problems finding a specific option described in there in your Seamonkey?
Hi Martin
To the best of my knowledge I followed the specific instructions given
but cannot receive my mail via SeaMonkey. A
Ray_Net wrote:
Bush wrote:
For some reason Everytime I push the Backspace Key, Seamonkey 1.1.14
goes back to the previuos URL that I was viewing .. Anyone know how to
turn this off.? When posting in web blogs I am not able to Correct
typing mistakes. Once I try to BACKSPACE the mistake, I am
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bush wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bush wrote:
The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index
When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a
Typo, And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bush wrote:
The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index
When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a Typo,
And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog.
Internet Explore lets me USE the Backspace to Correct the
The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index
When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a Typo,
And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog.
Internet Explore lets me USE the Backspace to Correct the Typo.
I See ( In Seamonkey help) That the BACKSPAC
For some reason Everytime I push the Backspace Key, Seamonkey 1.1.14
goes back to the previuos URL that I was viewing .. Anyone know how to
turn this off.? When posting in web blogs I am not able to Correct
typing mistakes. Once I try to BACKSPACE the mistake, I am LOGGED out of
the Website .
Norvin wrote:
Using SM .14 and just recently started getting the messages:
"The RETR command did not succeed. Error retrieving a message.
Mail server pop.att.yahoo.com responded: problem retrieving message."
I am still able to send emails, send/receive on newsgroups, just not
receive emails.
I
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bush wrote:
One other setting that may have an effect is View \ Character
Encoding \ Auto Detect \ Off. That's my setting, does yours match?
Auto is Off
try selecting Universal. I had the same problem and when I selected
that, all my pro
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Bush wrote:
One other setting that may have an effect is View \ Character
Encoding \ Auto Detect \ Off. That's my setting, does yours match?
Auto is Off
try selecting Universal. I had the same problem and when I selected
that, all my problems
Rickles wrote:
Bush wrote:
I have Cheracter code set to Western, But some webpages try to use
UNICODE and do not load up untill I choose view/character code/
western. and the page loads up immediately, But if I hit Reload it
tries to use UNICoDE again.
Edit/preferences/navigator/language is
I have Cheracter code set to Western, But some webpages try to use
UNICODE and do not load up untill I choose view/character code/ western.
and the page loads up immediately, But if I hit Reload it tries to use
UNICoDE again.
Edit/preferences/navigator/language is set to western (ISO-8859-1)
O
97 matches
Mail list logo
