___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Ant wrote on 8/05/2020 12:55 PM:
I noticed forwarding an incoming HTML e-mail gets lots bigger when I
sent it out when forwarding (not as an attachment). Example with a
mailing list e-mail that was about 200 KB in my inbox folder, but it was
800 KB after forwarding (not as an attachment) in my
I noticed forwarding an incoming HTML e-mail gets lots bigger when I
sent it out when forwarding (not as an attachment). Example with a
mailing list e-mail that was about 200 KB in my inbox folder, but it was
800 KB after forwarding (not as an attachment) in my sent folder. Why is
that?
Is
Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 16:20:02 UTC+2 schrieb Lemuel Johnson:
> On 4/8/2020 6:55 AM, d.e@mail.pcom.de wrote:
> > In the versions previous to 2.3.5.1 it was possible to choose and set
> > Seamonkey as the default e-mail app/tool/client in Windows 10. But when
> > ope
On 4/8/2020 6:55 AM, d.e@mail.pcom.de wrote:
In the versions previous to 2.3.5.1 it was possible to choose and set Seamonkey
as the default e-mail app/tool/client in Windows 10. But when opening the
default apps settings in Windows Seamonkey mail is not available anymore.
Is there any
d.e@mail.pcom.de wrote:
In the versions previous to 2.3.5.1 it was possible to choose and set Seamonkey
as the default e-mail app/tool/client in Windows 10. But when opening the
default apps settings in Windows Seamonkey mail is not available anymore.
Is there any workaround?
RB
I must
d.e@mail.pcom.de wrote:
In the versions previous to 2.3.5.1 it was possible to choose and set Seamonkey
as the default e-mail app/tool/client in Windows 10. But when opening the
default apps settings in Windows Seamonkey mail is not available anymore.
Is there any workaround?
RB
I have
In the versions previous to 2.3.5.1 it was possible to choose and set Seamonkey
as the default e-mail app/tool/client in Windows 10. But when opening the
default apps settings in Windows Seamonkey mail is not available anymore.
Is there any workaround?
RB
About a month ago, Yahoo e-mail would no longer download using the
e-mail client in SM 2.49.4.
I have read that there are instructions on how to fix this problem
somewhere but I can't find the information.
Can anyone point me toward a fix or a solution to the problem? Thanks,
in ad
Windows 7 is my platform and according to your information, I have the
latest version of Sea Monkey
Never have had this problem before
I can send and use the Browser but not able to receive email
Tells me there is no new message
would appreciate your help immensely
thank you
cj del valle
__
About a month ago, Yahoo e-mail would no longer download using the
e-mail client in SM 2.49.4.
I have read that there are instructions on how to fix this problem
somewhere but I can't find the information.
Can anyone point me toward a fix or a solution to the problem? Thanks,
in ad
my wife sends me an email on sea monkey with a MP4 and when I go to open
it, the default is note pad and It only gives me gobbily gook. How do I
get my default of note pad to change to a program thea will open the MP4
info or picture.
I right clicked and tried to see properties but no luck.
Can
On 11/29/19 3:15 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I too am having the same problem, started yesterday. I used to go into
the Yahoo interface and delete all my junk email before downloading my
email. Yesterday and today, because Yahoo cannot no longer read my
password correctly, had to just download all
I too am having the same problem, started yesterday. I used to go into
the Yahoo interface and delete all my junk email before downloading my
email. Yesterday and today, because Yahoo cannot no longer read my
password correctly, had to just download all email and then delete the
garbage..
H
Daniel wrote:
Henrik37 wrote on 29/11/2019 7:37 AM:
Help! As I understand it, to access my Yahoo e-mail account (i.e., download
e-mail messages on the Yahoo e-mail server via SeaMonkey) I need to
obtain/create a 'secure mail key' to use instead of the 'normal password'
Henrik37 wrote on 29/11/2019 7:37 AM:
Help! As I understand it, to access my Yahoo e-mail account (i.e.,
download e-mail messages on the Yahoo e-mail server via SeaMonkey) I
need to obtain/create a 'secure mail key' to use instead of the 'normal
password' entry in the se
Hello ,
Thanks for your email. We have received your request 03756064 and it is being
processed by our Support team.
To leave additional comments, please reply to this email.
Best,
TheFork team
TheFork, a TripAdvisor Company
___
support-seamonkey m
Help! As I understand it, to access my Yahoo e-mail account (i.e.,
download e-mail messages on the Yahoo e-mail server via SeaMonkey) I
need to obtain/create a 'secure mail key' to use instead of the 'normal
password' entry in the server settings of the usual SeaMonkey e-m
Ant composed on 2019-09-28 16:22 (UTC-0700):
> I just accidently moved a local POP3 (not IMAP) e-mail folder in my
> SeaMonkey v2.49.5. I noticed ctrl-z and undo options didn't work because
> they were disabled for this move. Is anyone else seeing this too? If so,
> then tha
any significant - or even not so significant - differences
between the e-mail clients in SM v.2.49.4 and v.2.49.5?
If so, what are they and where can I find a detailed explanation
and/or listing?
Thanks, in advance, for any guidance.--
"It's kind of an insane case ... 6,000 ants
I just accidently moved a local POP3 (not IMAP) e-mail folder in my
SeaMonkey v2.49.5. I noticed ctrl-z and undo options didn't work because
they were disabled for this move. Is anyone else seeing this too? If so,
then that's weird that it is disabled. :(
Thank you for reading and
nificant - or even not so significant - differences
between the e-mail clients in SM v.2.49.4 and v.2.49.5?
If so, what are they and where can I find a detailed explanation and/or
listing?
Thanks, in advance, for any guidance.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by
Check if this is the cause:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=3055083
FRG
NFN Smith wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
For reasons that have me completely confused, the SM v.2.49.4 e-mail client
will no longer download Yahoo (now owned by Verizon) e-mail messages via the
POP inter
Henrik37 wrote:
For reasons that have me completely confused, the SM v.2.49.4 e-mail
client will no longer download Yahoo (now owned by Verizon) e-mail
messages via the POP interface.
Does anyone have any information on this problem and how to fix it?
Thanks, in advance, for any and all
Henrik37 wrote on 09/27/2019 07:14 PM:
For reasons that have me completely confused, the SM v.2.49.4 e-mail client will
no longer download Yahoo (now owned by Verizon) e-mail messages via the POP
interface.
Does anyone have any information on this problem and how to fix it?
Dear Henrik
Are there any significant - or even not so significant - differences
between the e-mail clients in SM v.2.49.4 and v.2.49.5?
If so, what are they and where can I find a detailed explanation and/or
listing?
Thanks, in advance, for any guidance
For reasons that have me completely confused, the SM v.2.49.4 e-mail
client will no longer download Yahoo (now owned by Verizon) e-mail
messages via the POP interface.
Does anyone have any information on this problem and how to fix it?
Thanks, in advance, for any and all guidance, suggestions
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
Thanks to all who have responded. It now turns out that I have
conflated two, apparently quite different, pro
On 9/25/19 1:44 PM, Henrik37 wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc.
I get my ATT (pacbell) email through Yahoo and it is working fine with
SM 2.49.5
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
David H. Durgee wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
Are you using POP
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
Can
Henrik37 wrote:
> My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
>
> I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
> accounts on Google and Verizon.
>
> Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
> confused.
Are you using
Henrik37 wrote on 09/25/2019 05:01 AM:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail accounts on
Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really confused.
I use yaho
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
Can we assume you are using the email m
Henrik37 wrote:
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
For best results, please be specific
My Yahoo e-mail has quit working with SM 2.49.5.
I am also having other strange e-mail responses with other e-mail
accounts on Google and Verizon.
Anybody have any sort of explanation, suggestions, etc. I'm really
confused.
___
support-seam
Ant wrote on 03-09-19 22:27:
Oh wait. I see them in its sent folder after restarting my SM. Whew,
but why saved if they didn't get e-mailed from that server connect error?
If it is saved in the Sent Folder, you still have a copy that you can
try to re-send it again in one or two days when
On 9/3/2019 11:38 PM, Daniel wrote:
Paul Bergsagel wrote on 4/09/2019 11:44 AM:
Just a hunch->Maybe the email is saved in the sent folder before the
email is sent so if the send fails the email is still saved.
I seem to recall, when previously having trouble sending an e-mail, that
a copy
;t get e-mailed from that server connect
error? I sent a test e-mail, got the error, saw my saved sent copy,
checked my other account, and didn't get it in its inbox. :(
On 9/3/2019 1:23 PM, Ant wrote:
smtpauth.earthlink.net server is currently giving me "An error
occurred while send
ent folder after restarting my SM. Whew,
but why saved if they didn't get e-mailed from that server connect
error? I sent a test e-mail, got the error, saw my saved sent copy,
checked my other account, and didn't get it in its inbox. :(
On 9/3/2019 1:23 PM, Ant wrote:
smtpauth.earthlink.
sent a test e-mail, got the error, saw my saved sent copy, checked my
other account, and didn't get it in its inbox. :(
On 9/3/2019 1:23 PM, Ant wrote:
smtpauth.earthlink.net server is currently giving me "An error
occurred while sending mail: The mail server sent an incorrect
g
Oh wait. I see them in its sent folder after restarting my SM. Whew, but
why saved if they didn't get e-mailed from that server connect error? I
sent a test e-mail, got the error, saw my saved sent copy, checked my
other account, and didn't get it in its inbox. :(
On 9/3/2019 1:
smtpauth.earthlink.net server is currently giving me "An error occurred
while sending mail: The mail server sent an incorrect greeting: Too
many concurrent SMTP connections; please try again later..". So, I said
OK but that e-mail vanished. It's not in my sent, draft, etc. Di
On 5/27/19 12:54 AM, Danny Kile wrote:
My sister is have a problem with SeaMonkey 2.49.4 running on Windows-7.
When she send an e-mail to anyone this is what happens.
This may be what she typed.
Example of the text she may send is like this.
The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.
Now
On 5/27/2019 12:54 AM, Danny Kile
wrote:
My sister
is have a problem with SeaMonkey 2.49.4 running on Windows-7. When
she send an e-mail to anyone this is what happens.
This may be what she typed.
Example of the text she
My sister is have a problem with SeaMonkey 2.49.4 running on Windows-7.
When she send an e-mail to anyone this is what happens.
This may be what she typed.
Example of the text she may send is like this.
The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.
Now is the time for all good men to come to
Daniel wrote on 12/04/2019 12:26 AM:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/04/2019 12:01 AM:
Daniel wrote:
SM 2.49.1 on Win7.
Normally I read and respond to e-mails in Plain Text, but have need
to reply in HTML to a particular e-mail.
I know this change can be done 'on the fly'
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/04/2019 12:01 AM:
Daniel wrote:
SM 2.49.1 on Win7.
Normally I read and respond to e-mails in Plain Text, but have need to
reply in HTML to a particular e-mail.
I know this change can be done 'on the fly', but I've forgotten how.
CTRL-Reply,
Daniel wrote:
SM 2.49.1 on Win7.
Normally I read and respond to e-mails in Plain Text, but have need to
reply in HTML to a particular e-mail.
I know this change can be done 'on the fly', but I've forgotten how.
CTRL-Reply, maybe, although that doesn't seem to do anyth
SM 2.49.1 on Win7.
Normally I read and respond to e-mails in Plain Text, but have need to
reply in HTML to a particular e-mail.
I know this change can be done 'on the fly', but I've forgotten how.
CTRL-Reply, maybe, although that doesn't seem to do anything different.
I
Am 18.12.18 um 15:32 schrieb Paul in Houston, TX:
[...]
I use the Enterprise version of Outlook and it stores all emails in one
large *.ost file.
Mine is currently ~3.5 GB.
Afaik, no Win o/s has stored files of the same name in the same folder.
Maybe because it was based on the dos 8.3 system.
Daniel wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 18/12/2018 6:15 AM:
Ant wrote:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into another
folder and
then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by design?
My guess is that it is by SM design.
My old SM 2.26.1 does the sa
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 18/12/2018 6:15 AM:
Ant wrote:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and
then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by design?
My guess is that it is by SM design.
My old SM 2.26.1 does the same as yours.
Ant wrote on 18-12-18 03:18:
On 12/17/2018 8:56 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ant wrote on 16-12-18 09:53:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy
into another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug
or by design?
Could you copy a file i
On 12/17/2018 8:56 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ant wrote on 16-12-18 09:53:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by
design?
Could you copy a file in the same directory of the same
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 17-12-18 20:15:
Ant wrote:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and
then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by design?
My guess is that it is by SM design.
My old SM 2.26.1 does the same as yours.
Ed Mullen wrote on 17-12-18 17:56:
Ray_Net wrote:
Ant wrote on 16-12-18 09:53:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy
into another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug
or by design?
Could you copy a file in the same directory of the same hard
Ant wrote:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into another
folder and
then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by design?
My guess is that it is by SM design.
My old SM 2.26.1 does the same as yours.
My MS Outlook does allow direct multiple copies t
Ray_Net wrote:
Ant wrote on 16-12-18 09:53:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by
design?
Could you copy a file in the same directory of the same hard-disk on
your pc ?
CTRL-C then C
Ant wrote on 16-12-18 09:53:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by
design?
Could you copy a file in the same directory of the same hard-disk on
your pc ?
CTRL-C then CTRL-V would it c
Ant wrote on 16/12/2018 7:53 PM:
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by
design?
Ant, if you had an e-mail called "ABCDE" and copied it to the same
folder, shouldn't the
I wanted to duplicate the e-mail, but it didn't work. I can copy into
another folder and then move it to where I want. Is this a bug or by design?
--
"Ants can lift up to 50 times their own weight. And your monitor is
missing. Time to bring out the bugspray." --BBspot's Ge
David wrote, on 19 Aug 18 14:18:
While I realize that Seamonkey may view itself as a one-in-all package,
I personally would only like to use the e-mail client, since I prefer
current Firefox for browsing.
But of course copying/pasting links is kind of annoying.
Is it possible to change how
David wrote on 20/08/2018 4:03 AM:
Mason83 wrote:
On 19/08/2018 19:18, David wrote:
While I realize that Seamonkey may view itself as a one-in-all package,
I personally would only like to use the e-mail client, since I prefer
current Firefox for browsing.
But of course copying/pasting links
Mason83 wrote:
On 19/08/2018 19:18, David wrote:
While I realize that Seamonkey may view itself as a one-in-all package,
I personally would only like to use the e-mail client, since I prefer
current Firefox for browsing.
But of course copying/pasting links is kind of annoying.
Is it possible
On 19/08/2018 19:18, David wrote:
> While I realize that Seamonkey may view itself as a one-in-all package,
> I personally would only like to use the e-mail client, since I prefer
> current Firefox for browsing.
> But of course copying/pasting links is kind of annoying.
> Is
While I realize that Seamonkey may view itself as a one-in-all package,
I personally would only like to use the e-mail client, since I prefer
current Firefox for browsing.
But of course copying/pasting links is kind of annoying.
Is it possible to change how links are opened somewhere? Didn&#
DoctorBill wrote:
I have three external e-mail accounts which I can go to INDIVIDUALLY and
use.
How do you "go to" them individually? If you're logging in to webmail,
that uses completely different protocols.
I also am attempting to use those accounts FROM the SM E-mail Su
WaltS48 wrote on 19-07-18 01:52:
On 7/18/18 6:52 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
I have three external e-mail accounts which I can go to INDIVIDUALLY and
use.
I also am attempting to use those accounts FROM the SM E-mail Suite -
and I
run into a problem with Frontier.com.
Every time I attempt to SEND
On 7/18/18 6:52 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
I have three external e-mail accounts which I can go to INDIVIDUALLY and
use.
I also am attempting to use those accounts FROM the SM E-mail Suite - and I
run into a problem with Frontier.com.
Every time I attempt to SEND a message using the Frontier account
I have three external e-mail accounts which I can go to INDIVIDUALLY and
use.
I also am attempting to use those accounts FROM the SM E-mail Suite - and I
run into a problem with Frontier.com.
Every time I attempt to SEND a message using the Frontier account, I get
an error
message "Log
JAS wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 4/9/18 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this
On 4/10/2018 10:45 AM, IRRITATING SPAMMER wrote:
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 4/9/2018 2:31 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
If you toggle the pref to disallow unauthenticated content from being
displayed, do the images disappear?
Edit | Preferences | Privacy & Security | SSL/TLS
[ ] Don't load insecu
WaltS48 wrote:
On 4/9/18 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cor
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...@cornell.edu. A "View it
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 4/9/2018 2:31 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
If you toggle the pref to disallow unauthenticated content from being
displayed, do the images disappear?
Edit | Preferences | Privacy & Security | SSL/TLS
[ ] Don't load insecure content on encrypted pages
Unchecked that box
On 4/9/2018 2:31 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
If you toggle the pref to disallow unauthenticated content from being
displayed, do the images disappear?
Edit | Preferences | Privacy & Security | SSL/TLS
[ ] Don't load insecure content on encrypted pages
Unchecked that box, still have images.
Lemuel Johnson wrote:
On 4/9/2018 9:14 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this ad
On 4/9/2018 9:14 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...@cor
Ed Mullen wrote:
On 4/9/2018 at 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston created this epitome of digital
genius:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is
On 4/9/2018 at 11:55 AM, Jonathan N. Little created this epitome of
digital genius:
Ed Mullen wrote:
On 4/9/2018 at 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston created this epitome of
digital genius:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set
IRRITATING SPAMMER wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...@cornell.edu. A "View it i
On 4/9/18 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display
their included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and
the block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...@corn
On 4/9/2018 at 10:14 AM, Cecil Bankston created this epitome of digital
genius:
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receiv
Some of the commercial, non-spam messages I receive do not display their
included images. I have preferences set to show all images, and the
block images box is not checked. An example of this is messages I
receive from this address: cornellbi...@cornell.edu. A "View it in your
browser" link
EE wrote:
If people know enough to send email as multipart, they know enough to
put something in both parts of it. I have managed to educate most of
the organizations that contact me to do that.
You don't need to know anything, really. All you have to do is set your
program to do it, and th
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 28-03-18 18:27:
Ray_Net wrote:
Now, a lot of those people put a link in the plain text part of the
message and that leads to a web page, which will open in a browser.
That works for me. I also informed the multipart senders that I would
delete the mail as junk if
lly learned!
I kindly e-mail back that I don't see that information, but they
insist it is my fault and to use a better e-mail client. :(
This is their fault, but they don't care YOU MUST ACCEPT, DISPLAY AND
READ THE HTML PART !
Now, a lot of those people put a link in the plain tex
Ray_Net wrote:
Ant wrote on 28-03-18 06:13:
...> I have had to re-educate business organizations who insist on
sending
multipart email to put something useful into the plain text part of
the message, since that is the only part I would see. Some of them
actually learned!
I kindly e-m
see. Some of them
actually learned!
I kindly e-mail back that I don't see that information, but they
insist it is my fault and to use a better e-mail client. :(
This is their fault, but they don't care YOU MUST ACCEPT, DISPLAY AND
READ THE HTML PART !
Yeah, it sucks. I am seeing t
On 3/27/2018 9:55 PM, Daniel wrote:
...
I have had to re-educate business organizations who insist on sending
multipart email to put something useful into the plain text part of
the message, since that is the only part I would see. Some of them
actually learned!
One has to wonder why "they"
ned!
I kindly e-mail back that I don't see that information, but they
insist it is my fault and to use a better e-mail client. :(
This is their fault, but they don't care YOU MUST ACCEPT, DISPLAY AND
READ THE HTML PART !
Yeah, it sucks. I am seeing this happening more and more
Ant wrote on 28-03-18 06:13:
...> I have had to re-educate business organizations who insist on
sending
multipart email to put something useful into the plain text part of
the message, since that is the only part I would see. Some of them
actually learned!
I kindly e-mail back that I do
EE wrote on 28/03/18 06:01:
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote on 27/03/18 17:58:
I got a HTML e-mail with its hidden section when using plain text
mode. It only shows up in HTML mode (both original and simple). The
section was
http://CXTSoftware.recruiterbox.com/questionnaires/fb035u
...> I have had to re-educate business organizations who insist on sending
multipart email to put something useful into the plain text part of the
message, since that is the only part I would see. Some of them actually
learned!
I kindly e-mail back that I don't see that information,
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote on 27/03/18 17:58:
I got a HTML e-mail with its hidden section when using plain text
mode. It only shows up in HTML mode (both original and simple). The
section was
http://CXTSoftware.recruiterbox.com/questionnaires/fb035u/";>
On 3/27/2018 1:36 AM, Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote on 27/03/18 17:58:
I got a HTML e-mail with its hidden section when using plain text
mode. It only shows up in HTML mode (both original and simple). The
section was
http://CXTSoftware.recruiterbox.com/questionnaires/fb035u
1 - 100 of 1228 matches
Mail list logo
