Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: [...] By the way, since a few days a notice spurious crashes when starting SM 2.1. The not very illuminating message on an xterm is only 'Segfault'. Hm. Maybe my next build should be a debug one. Or i could wait until this problem vanishes. Surely more comfortable. :) Hartmut --

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: >http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=w9ej5u&s=4 Maybe you may find this screenshot interesting. This time with AA. Left SM2 und right SM1. Both using the same font, arial 11pt. The pictures are taken with 'xmag -mag 10'. http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091101-b.png (12 KB) Well, i don

Re: Locking Cookies?

2009-10-31 Thread Rex
David E. Ross wrote: Is there some way to lock the cookies so that subsequent browsing does not change existing entries? With SM 1.1.x, I originally set cookies.txt to read-only. When a bug was introduced that caused read-only settings to be ignored, I then created a backup file called cookies.

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 09:53 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 10/31/2009 08:43 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Hartmut Figge: >> >>>Looks here so. Left SM 2.1, right SM1.1.18. >> >> Not much to see without the link. ;) >> http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091101.png (23 KB) >> >> Hartmut > > Happy to send you my

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 08:43 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Hartmut Figge: > >>Looks here so. Left SM 2.1, right SM1.1.18. > > Not much to see without the link. ;) > http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091101.png (23 KB) > > Hartmut Happy to send you my side-by-side directly - would that be OK? ___

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge: >Looks here so. Left SM 2.1, right SM1.1.18. Not much to see without the link. ;) http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091101.png (23 KB) Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von Usern fuer User :-) ___ support-

Re: Seamonkey mail better in Linux than in Windows 7?

2009-10-31 Thread Rod Lovett
Hi Bill, this may be dumb, but in what menu is this checkbox for including the image found in SM, so far I have had no luck, and am now using SM 2.0 in Windows 7 Cheers Rod Rod Lovett wrote: Hi, I notice that in Linux composing mail in Seamonkey mail, and copying and past

Re: DASH-DASH-SPACE SIGNATURE. WAS Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
Leonidas Jones: >If you set it to reply above the quote, and then set it to place the >quote after your reply, there will be no sig delimiter. If the >delimiter is placed at the very bottom, SM is going to plave the delimiter. Cannot try wit my build. I had first to fetch an unmodified one for

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: >Sorry, I should also add that I can run both 2.0 and 1.1.18 in parallel; >adjust the windows & place side-by-side to compare. Looks here so. Left SM 2.1, right SM1.1.18. I don't like AA and have it disabled with - ~/.fonts.conf- false --- Hartmut

Re: mailboxes/folders

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
Tim Mathews wrote: On 31/10/2009 11:33 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: Tim Mathews wrote: Just took Seamonkey for a test drive, liked it and except for one thing would consider making it my complete browser e-mail and news package. With all the ties to the other Mozilla programs and similarities, I'm

Re: SM 1.X / 2.X newsgroup MSF file maintenance / compacting

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
User wrote: I noticed that when I have newsgroup MSF index files from sometime ago, and if there are a lot of expired articles / messages in the newsgroup MSF index, and then I click the link displayed in an expired message to delete all the expired articles, the MSF index file does not appear to

Re: SM 2.0 URL escape character auto conversion

2009-10-31 Thread User
Thanks very much. Look forward to the bug report URL here if you don't mind posting it later. NoOp wrote: On 10/31/2009 07:20 PM, User wrote: NoOp wrote: On 10/30/2009 07:27 PM, User wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Sure, here is an easy, reliable example[1]: SM 2.0: https://help.ubuntu.com/commun

Re: Locking Cookies?

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/31/2009 11:59 AM, Rufus wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> Is there some way to lock the cookies so that subsequent browsing does >> not change existing entries? With SM 1.1.x, I originally set >> cookies.txt to read-only. When a bug was introduced that caused >> read-only settings to be igno

Re: DASH-DASH-SPACE SIGNATURE. WAS Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
Hartmut Figge wrote: Paul B. Gallagher: Go into Mail& Newsgroup Account Settings for your NG account and set up a different sig from the one you use for other purposes. I do have different sigs for different NGs or newsservers. Here is one of them. In fact, I have five different sigs for m

Re: SM 2.0 URL escape character auto conversion

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 07:20 PM, User wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 10/30/2009 07:27 PM, User wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: >> ... Sure, here is an easy, reliable example[1]: SM 2.0: https://help.ubuntu.com/community click on #5 in 'Contents: Getting to know and work with your system You

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 07:54 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 10/31/2009 07:21 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: >> NoOp: >> >>>2.0 fonts in Ubuntu 9.04 & 9.10 (gnome) are clean, clear, well spaced, >>>etc. However, when I switch to 1.1.18 (same machine) the fonts are >>>skinny, harder to read, and rather irritating. >> >> Sa

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 07:21 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > NoOp: > >>2.0 fonts in Ubuntu 9.04 & 9.10 (gnome) are clean, clear, well spaced, >>etc. However, when I switch to 1.1.18 (same machine) the fonts are >>skinny, harder to read, and rather irritating. > > Same setting for anti-aliasing? > > Hartmut O

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread User
NoOp wrote: When I first open the server (click the right triangle next to the server name), cpu skyrockets& all things mozilla pause. I can confirm that this does not happen when doing the same from my 1.1.18 (linux& windows). Strangely also, when the newsgroup auto check messages function is

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread Barry Edwin Gilmour
dirk wrote: Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote: Hi, since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a new tab from an existing window,

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > NoOp: > >> I have 'Check for...' turned off for all news servers, but have >> grown accustom to the high cpu when checking my gmane.org newsgroups >> in 2.0 where I have at least 25 subscribed groups. > > Yes, it doesn't matter if you check manually

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: >2.0 fonts in Ubuntu 9.04 & 9.10 (gnome) are clean, clear, well spaced, >etc. However, when I switch to 1.1.18 (same machine) the fonts are >skinny, harder to read, and rather irritating. Same setting for anti-aliasing? Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Von Usern f

Re: SM 2.0 URL escape character auto conversion

2009-10-31 Thread User
NoOp wrote: On 10/30/2009 07:27 PM, User wrote: NoOp wrote: ... Sure, here is an easy, reliable example[1]: SM 2.0: https://help.ubuntu.com/community click on #5 in 'Contents: Getting to know and work with your system You'll see that in SM2.0 the URL ends up as:

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 03:42 AM, Rod Lovett wrote: > Hi, > I know you guys are very windows centric, but I am having font > rendering issues with seamonkey 2.0 in Debian Linux. > It is indeed like firefox, which also has poor font rendering in Debian, > despite tweaking appearance. > > I know there a

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
NoOp: > I have 'Check for...' turned off for all news servers, but have > grown accustom to the high cpu when checking my gmane.org newsgroups > in 2.0 where I have at least 25 subscribed groups. Yes, it doesn't matter if you check manually or if that si done automatically. > When I first open t

Re: mailboxes/folders

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 07:55 AM, Tim Mathews wrote: > On 31/10/2009 11:33 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: >> Tim Mathews wrote: >>> Just took Seamonkey for a test drive, liked it and except for one thing >>> would consider making it my complete browser e-mail and news package. >>> With all the ties to the other Mo

Re: SM 2.0 URL escape character auto conversion

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/30/2009 07:27 PM, User wrote: > NoOp wrote: ... >> Sure, here is an easy, reliable example[1]: >> >> SM 2.0: >> https://help.ubuntu.com/community >> click on #5 in 'Contents: Getting to know and work with your system >> You'll see that in SM2.0 the URL ends up as: >>

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 04:58 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > User: > >>One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the >>Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the >>news >>folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either >>highli

Re: top/bottom post and sig

2009-10-31 Thread Phillip Jones
Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.10.2009 12:00, Rick Merrill wrote: --- Original Message --- I try to 'bottom post' to newsgroups but 'top reply' to email. But the sig file appears at the bottom of either. Is there a way to make sig-file follow the top/bottom post setting? Each "account" has it'

Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

2009-10-31 Thread Jens Hatlak
Rufus wrote: Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... No, it doesn't encrypt by default, only obscure

Re: DASH-DASH-SPACE SIGNATURE. WAS Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
Paul B. Gallagher: > Go into Mail & Newsgroup Account Settings for your NG account and set > up a different sig from the one you use for other purposes. I do have different sigs for different NGs or newsservers. Here is one of them. > In fact, I have five different sigs for my five different mai

Re: DASH-DASH-SPACE SIGNATURE. WAS Re: Spoofing in SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Hartmut Figge wrote: Leonidas Jones: [delimiter] If you set up a sig file in SeaMonkey Mail & Newsgroup Account Settings, it will be added for you automatically. Right. And that i don't like. For this NG i'm using a sig file, which contains only the word Hartmut. I don't want the delimiter i

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
User: >Thanks again for your reply. Do you have any confirmation whether the >collapsed news server state in SM 1.X resulted in the application >from skipping of the news server fetch operation? Too long ago for me. I am using self compiled nightlies for many years and SM1, well, after deleting o

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread User
Hartmut Figge wrote: User: One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the news folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either highlight the news server or open it and high

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

2009-10-31 Thread NoOp
On 10/31/2009 09:12 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Server: news.eternal-september.org >> Fails on port NNTP (119) and NNTPS (563 with SSL) with this message: >> http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/SS-NoPost-SM2.0.png >> >> And my first test post to this server failed silently a

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
User: >One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the >Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the news >folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either >highlight >the news server or open it and highlight one of th

SM 1.X / 2.X newsgroup MSF file maintenance / compacting

2009-10-31 Thread User
I noticed that when I have newsgroup MSF index files from sometime ago, and if there are a lot of expired articles / messages in the newsgroup MSF index, and then I click the link displayed in an expired message to delete all the expired articles, the MSF index file does not appear to be compact

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread User
Hartmut Figge wrote: User: An update to the reoccuring stalling mystery of SM 2.0 that I posted in detail earlier. After many hours of close observation of the CPU load on the individual CPU cores on the multi-core CPU I am running on, using both the AMD Power Monitor (which displayed individua

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
HilsB wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In in your profile directory/folder, locate the user.js file. If there is no such file, open an ASCII text editor (e.g., Notepad on Windows) to create it. In user.js enter the following: user_pref("signon.startup.prompt", false); // don't a

SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
Under 1.1.18 there was a pref selection for encryption vise obscuring of sensitive data during storage. Is it correct to assume that SM 2.0 now encrypts sensitive data by default, and with what strength? Strong 128 bit?..I hope... ...it would also be nice if the Password Quality meter that a

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread HilsB
Jens Hatlak wrote: David E. Ross wrote: In in your profile directory/folder, locate the user.js file. If there is no such file, open an ASCII text editor (e.g., Notepad on Windows) to create it. In user.js enter the following: user_pref("signon.startup.prompt", false); // don't ask for master

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 font rendering in Debian

2009-10-31 Thread Rod Lovett
Dear Rick, thanks for the about:config advice, it helped a bit with fonts in Debian, but things still look a bit washed out on web pages such as distrowatch. I tried changing these values below, but I may tread where angels fear . It may have helped a bit too. gfx.color_managem

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
Leonidas Jones wrote: HilsB wrote: Rufus wrote: HilsB wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Gabriele wrote: HilsB ha scritto: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I agree :) [cut] Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software security device' - no other passwords re

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
HilsB wrote: Rufus wrote: HilsB wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Gabriele wrote: HilsB ha scritto: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I agree :) [cut] Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software security device' - no other passwords required after registerin

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
dirk wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: /snip/ From here, if I middle click the link, it opens in a new tab in the browser, with the browser still staying in the background. I honestly don't remember if I had to do any particular tweaks to get it to do that, so far as I recall, it just

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread HilsB
Rufus wrote: HilsB wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Gabriele wrote: HilsB ha scritto: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I agree :) [cut] Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software security device' - no other passwords required after registering 1.1.18's mai

Re: Google Maps' Zoom Out (-)

2009-10-31 Thread Ant
On 10/9/2009 9:18 PM PT, Ant typed: Clicking on the slider bar just above the '-' also works. It seems like just the button itself is dead. The '+' works fine. Yeah. Still annoying. Oh well. I hope Google fixes this soon! Still unresolved according to others and me in http://www.google.com

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
HilsB wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Gabriele wrote: HilsB ha scritto: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I agree :) [cut] Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software security device' - no other passwords required after registering 1.1.18's mail / newsgroup

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread HilsB
Phillip Jones wrote: Gabriele wrote: HilsB ha scritto: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I agree :) [cut] Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software security device' - no other passwords required after registering 1.1.18's mail / newsgroup passwords. My

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread Hartmut Figge
User: >An update to the reoccuring stalling mystery of SM 2.0 that I posted in detail >earlier. After many hours of close observation of the CPU load on the >individual >CPU cores on the multi-core CPU I am running on, using both the AMD Power >Monitor (which displayed individual core load and

Re: Strange SM2 behaviour

2009-10-31 Thread Alex
Thank you. This was exactly the issue. I assumed that SM1.1.18 was overwritten by SM2. How to solve the issue with autocomplete and remembering User ID and Passwords? Alex cciaffone wrote: Rufus wrote: If you have both versions installed, you may want to check/verify which you have select

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread dirk
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote: Hi, since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a new tab from an existing window, and the browser

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread dirk
NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote: Hi, since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be placed in the foreground, but

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread dirk
NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote: Hi, since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be placed in the foreground, but

Re: opening tabs in background AND in new tabs in an existing window

2009-10-31 Thread dirk
Leonidas Jones wrote: NoOp wrote: On 10/29/2009 09:41 AM, dirk wrote: Hi, since the beginning of using SM (after Netscape Suite), when I simply clicked a link from in the SM mail program, it would open the link in a new tab from an existing window, and the browser program would NOT be placed

Re: SM 2 Composer Preview links need to be made active

2009-10-31 Thread INFO WG
Leonidas Jones put forth: >The Composer component is probably the lowest priority for the volunteer > >Take a look at KompoZer: > >http://www.kompozer.net/ > >Does it do what you want it to do? > >If so, that is said to be the basis for SM Composer as of 2.1, if all >goes well. Hopefully no, a

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

2009-10-31 Thread lruss
On Oct 31, 1:40 pm, chicagofan wrote: >   NoOp wrote: > >> On 10/30/2009 02:50 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > >>> Server: news.eternal-september.org Fails on port NNTP (119) and NNTPS > >>> (563 with SSL) with this message: > >>>http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/SS-NoPost-SM2.0.png > > That's the s

Re: Locking Cookies?

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
David E. Ross wrote: Is there some way to lock the cookies so that subsequent browsing does not change existing entries? With SM 1.1.x, I originally set cookies.txt to read-only. When a bug was introduced that caused read-only settings to be ignored, I then created a backup file called cookies.

Re: Follow-up, SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
JR WG wrote: Follow-up... RE: SM2 Composer Preview mode not activating links, thus not allowing them to be clicked on to test and/or cause a browser to be automatically opened to the link. I. SM2 and Composer Introduction in Workshops Well, after two Workshops (we give quite a few), I intr

Re: Strange SM2 behaviour

2009-10-31 Thread cciaffone
Rufus wrote: If you have both versions installed, you may want to check/verify which you have selected as your Default browser in your system prefs...at least, that would be my guess... Also if you have Quick Launch enabled for 1.1.18, it will load itself on boot and become your default browse

Locking Cookies?

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
Is there some way to lock the cookies so that subsequent browsing does not change existing entries? With SM 1.1.x, I originally set cookies.txt to read-only. When a bug was introduced that caused read-only settings to be ignored, I then created a backup file called cookies.bak.txt; before launchi

Re: How to stop Seamonkey 2.0 from downloading email automatically?

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
sambayer wrote: Yes there is for Mac User. Edit Menu > Mail & Newsgroups Account settings > click on each email box title and news group title > server settings. They have to be set for each account. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"http://www.phillipmjones.net

Re: How to stop Seamonkey 2.0 from downloading email automatically?

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
sambayer wrote: /snip/ Thanks so far to all who replied, but I don't seem to be any closer to an answer yet. See my earlier response, that option is there for POP accounts. You never said you used IMAP. I do find that once I have connected to an IMAP account, it will pull in messages wit

Re: How to stop Seamonkey 2.0 from downloading email automatically?

2009-10-31 Thread sambayer
> Its there for POP accounts only.  IMAP mail and newsgroup accounts don't > have it.  When you click ail and Newsgroup Account Settings, make sure > you have selected a POP account. > > Lee Thanks Lee. Do you mean that at the moment, there's no way to prevent an IMAP account from checking mail a

Re: How to stop Seamonkey 2.0 from downloading email automatically?

2009-10-31 Thread sambayer
> Yes there is for Mac User. > Edit Menu > Mail & Newsgroups Account settings > click on each email box > title  and news group title > server settings. > > They have to be set for each account. > > -- > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.    "If it's Fixed, Don't Break > it"http://www.phillipmjones.net   

Re: How to stop Seamonkey 2.0 from downloading email automatically?

2009-10-31 Thread Leonidas Jones
sambayer wrote: On Oct 30, 4:11 pm, u...@domain.invalid wrote: Click on edit just above the "get messages button" Then click on mail& newsgroups account settings then click server settings there you will see a check-box for " Automatically download new messages " Nope. Could the problem be th

Re: Strange SM2 behaviour

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
Alex wrote: I use SM 1.1.18 and yesterday I received a note that a new version is available for download. I did it and installed SM 2. Everything seems to be working fine but I could not get SM2 to work with previously saved ID's and passwords. I tried several fixes I found on the net (previous

Strange SM2 behaviour

2009-10-31 Thread Alex
I use SM 1.1.18 and yesterday I received a note that a new version is available for download. I did it and installed SM 2. Everything seems to be working fine but I could not get SM2 to work with previously saved ID's and passwords. I tried several fixes I found on the net (previous version had

Re: SM 2.0 bookmarks question

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
Martin Freitag wrote: cmcadams schrieb: Can anyone tell me if SM2's bookmarks sorts are 'persistent' (as in 1.1.18's physical sort of the html file). FF's inability to do this, the last time I tried it, was a deal-breaker. I've read that SM's bookmarks are now stored in a 'database', but that do

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Rufus
HilsB wrote: First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. I'm on a MAC intel and downloaded / installed SM2 which replaced 1.1.18. SM2 would not recognise Master Password from 1.1.18. but would allow a new Master Password but would delete all held p'words etc.. Hmmm! Redownloaded 1.1.18 and

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread User
David E. Ross wrote: On 10/30/2009 8:37 AM, User wrote: Ever since upgrading smoothly to SM 2.0, I have noticed that embedded flash video windows no longer loads in pages such as these: http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/30/technology/facebook_spammer/index.htm?postversion=2009103010 Normally, under

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - The Modern Internet Suite is Here!

2009-10-31 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:36:49 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Chris Ilias schrieb: >> Okay, here's how to use about:crashes to assess the cause of a crash: > > Now I'd love to have a support website where we could make sure this is > copied and pasted to... ;-) Most of it is already here:

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

2009-10-31 Thread chicagofan
NoOp wrote: On 10/30/2009 02:50 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Server: news.eternal-september.org Fails on port NNTP (119) and NNTPS (563 with SSL) with this message: http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/SS-NoPost-SM2.0.png That's the same message I get *anytime* ES has too much traffic or they ar

Re: about:config

2009-10-31 Thread User
Rick Merrill wrote: Where might the settings in about:config be described? Couldn't find it in 'help' (SM 1.18). Try here: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_:_FAQs_:_About:config_Entries http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Preferences Not all parameters are necessarily on SM, or used / recogniz

Re: about:config

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/31/2009 8:57 AM, Rick Merrill wrote: > Where might the settings in about:config be described? > > Couldn't find it in 'help' (SM 1.18). A request for a dictionary of preference variables is in bug #178685. But the developers definitely don't like the idea of users having this. They want to

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/31/2009 8:34 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> In in your profile directory/folder, locate the user.js file. If there >> is no such file, open an ASCII text editor (e.g., Notepad on Windows) to >> create it. >> >> In user.js enter the following: >> >> user_pref("signon.startup

Re: SM 2.0 configuration parameter - browser.cache.check_doc_frequency

2009-10-31 Thread User
Martin Freitag wrote: User schrieb: Could someone tell me what exactly the function of the SM 2.0 configuration parameter called: browser.cache.check_doc_frequency is for and how its value may impact performance? The parameter appears to suggest how frequently the browser would check its cache

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread User
Nope. I always disable all automatic updates for all my software if at all possible, including SM. The release I am currently running is the original release posted on the official Seamonkey project page on the first day it was released. It has not been updated since nor am I aware that there is

Re: Cannot Install Seamonkey 2.0?

2009-10-31 Thread Steven Hilgendorf
Marcelo wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 30/10/2009 21:42, Steven Hilgendorf told the world: Trying to install Seamonkey 2.0 on Windows Visa Premium. When I double-click on the install file it unpacks and throws up a Run As dialog indicating "You my not have the necessary permissions to use all

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread Rick Merrill
Are you doing updates more than once a day? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: top/bottom post and sig

2009-10-31 Thread Jay Garcia
On 31.10.2009 12:00, Rick Merrill wrote: --- Original Message --- I try to 'bottom post' to newsgroups but 'top reply' to email. But the sig file appears at the bottom of either. Is there a way to make sig-file follow the top/bottom post setting? Each "account" has it's own unique settings

top/bottom post and sig

2009-10-31 Thread Rick Merrill
I try to 'bottom post' to newsgroups but 'top reply' to email. But the sig file appears at the bottom of either. Is there a way to make sig-file follow the top/bottom post setting? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: SM 2.0 bookmarks question

2009-10-31 Thread Martin Freitag
cmcadams schrieb: > Can anyone tell me if SM2's bookmarks sorts are 'persistent' (as in > 1.1.18's physical sort of the html file). FF's inability to do this, the > last time I tried it, was a deal-breaker. I've read that SM's bookmarks > are now stored in a 'database', but that doesn't tell me any

Re: SM 2.0 configuration parameter - browser.cache.check_doc_frequency

2009-10-31 Thread Martin Freitag
User schrieb: > Could someone tell me what exactly the function of the SM 2.0 > configuration parameter called: > > browser.cache.check_doc_frequency > > is for and how its value may impact performance? The parameter appears > to suggest how frequently the browser would check its cache folder for

Re: SM2.0 Erased Password Manager

2009-10-31 Thread Martin Freitag
TMitchell schrieb: > SM2.0 erased the contents of Password manager, costing me dozens of site > usernames and passwords. Exactly where on Windos is the data for > Password Manger kept? I might be able to recover that lost data from my > last system backup. Also, is that date kept in a location d

about:config

2009-10-31 Thread Rick Merrill
Where might the settings in about:config be described? Couldn't find it in 'help' (SM 1.18). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Feedback to Seamonkey developers - SM 2.0 high CPU resource consumption bursts

2009-10-31 Thread User
An update to the reoccuring stalling mystery of SM 2.0 that I posted in detail earlier. After many hours of close observation of the CPU load on the individual CPU cores on the multi-core CPU I am running on, using both the AMD Power Monitor (which displayed individual core load and dynamic core

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts

2009-10-31 Thread Martin Freitag
Rod Lovett schrieb: > It is indeed like firefox, which also has poor font rendering in Debian, > despite tweaking appearance. > > Seamonkey 1.18 looks much better, and implements the system fonts well. > This may because it had an installer like previous versions, and picked > up font rendering, a

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Jens Hatlak
David E. Ross wrote: In in your profile directory/folder, locate the user.js file. If there is no such file, open an ASCII text editor (e.g., Notepad on Windows) to create it. In user.js enter the following: user_pref("signon.startup.prompt", false); // don't ask for master password until it's

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Jens Hatlak
Keith Whaley wrote: I just checked my Preferences on 1.1.18, and I must have set one, a long time ago, as that radio button has a dot in it, but all this time I've never been asked to deal with any Software Security Device. Must be new with 2.0. If you still know the Master Password you can d

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread User
Martin Freitag wrote: User schrieb: I don't believe I have NO-SCRIPT add on installed. When I go to the ADD-ON manager and click on GET ADD-ONS, it did display NO-SCRIPT as one of the available add-ons I could install, but I didn't click the install button and I'm assuming this add-on is current

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread Martin Freitag
User schrieb: > I don't believe I have NO-SCRIPT add on installed. When I go to the > ADD-ON manager and click on GET ADD-ONS, it did display NO-SCRIPT as one > of the available add-ons I could install, but I didn't click the install > button and I'm assuming this add-on is currently NOT installed

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

2009-10-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bill Davidsen wrote: Server: news.eternal-september.org Fails on port NNTP (119) and NNTPS (563 with SSL) with this message: http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/SS-NoPost-SM2.0.png And my first test post to this server failed silently as well. WTH? NOTE: since tested on another server with aut

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread User
David E. Ross wrote: On 10/30/2009 8:37 AM, User wrote: Ever since upgrading smoothly to SM 2.0, I have noticed that embedded flash video windows no longer loads in pages such as these: http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/30/technology/facebook_spammer/index.htm?postversion=2009103010 Normally, under

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/30/2009 8:37 AM, User wrote: > Ever since upgrading smoothly to SM 2.0, I have noticed that embedded flash > video windows no longer loads in pages such as these: > > http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/30/technology/facebook_spammer/index.htm?postversion=2009103010 > > Normally, under SM 1.X, the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - The Modern Internet Suite is Here!

2009-10-31 Thread Robert Kaiser
Chris Ilias schrieb: Okay, here's how to use about:crashes to assess the cause of a crash: Now I'd love to have a support website where we could make sure this is copied and pasted to... ;-) Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-

Re: Version 2.1 comment by Mr. Kaiser

2009-10-31 Thread Robert Kaiser
OldCroc schrieb: If version 2.1 is not looked forward to by Mr. Kaiser, is it possible the parts he does not want will be modified before it comes out? I have no clue what you are talking about - I'm looking very much forward to 2.1, but we don't have firm plans for it yet, we'll know more ar

Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/31/2009 2:29 AM, HilsB wrote: > First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2. > I'm on a MAC intel and downloaded / installed SM2 which replaced > 1.1.18. SM2 would not recognise Master Password from 1.1.18. but > would allow a new Master Password but would delete all held > p'words etc

Re: Newbie asks

2009-10-31 Thread Lou
JeffM wrote: Lou wrote: Advantages / Disadvantages to SM? With all the apps under one roof in SeaMonkey, the memory footprint is smaller than if you had Firefox, Thunderbird, ChatZilla, and KompoZer[1] all installed individually and open at once. Decide for yourself if you like the UI better

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

2009-10-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
NoOp wrote: On 10/30/2009 02:50 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Server: news.eternal-september.org Fails on port NNTP (119) and NNTPS (563 with SSL) with this message: http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/Private/SS-NoPost-SM2.0.png And my first test post to this server failed silently as well. WTH? NOT

Re: Embedded flash videos loading failure under SM 2.0

2009-10-31 Thread User
Hartmut Figge wrote: User: Ever since upgrading smoothly to SM 2.0, I have noticed that embedded flash video windows no longer loads in pages such as these: http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/30/technology/facebook_spammer/index.htm?postversion=2009103010 I have now disabled flashblock and tested.

  1   2   >