Stan wrote:
I fixed the incorrect E-mail address and everything works fine.
Good to hear that, Stan. Sometimes the little ones are the most
frustrating, eh? :-)
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
JohnQPublic wrote:
Some email services may not support SeaMonkey.
What makes you think that?
As far as the rest of your response goes, it doesn't address the
question/issue that the OP said he was sending to an incorrect domain
name - incorrect for his town.
We'll all just have to wait and
JohnQPublic wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
JohnQPublic wrote:
Some email services may not support SeaMonkey.
What makes you think that?
Read the mozillazine thread I quoted. Like someone else in this
thread also mentioned, Comcast may not...
I especially liked the comment
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken
sniffing, IMO.
All sniffing is broken, IMO.
If you are willing to do without any feature introduced after
MOSAIC, or Netscape, or IE6
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
They don't seem to accept anything above rv:1.9.2.* - quite broken
sniffing, IMO.
All sniffing is broken, IMO.
--
-bts
-This post best viewed with Internet Explorer 4.0
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
km wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
km wrote:
... is there a way to get rid of that annoying
black bar ( ) in .sigs???
b
If you mean the signature delimiter it is two hyphens and a space on a
line by itself. --
It has the purpose of allowing a replying email client
km wrote:
... is there a way to get rid of that annoying
black bar ( ) in .sigs???
b
If you mean the signature delimiter it is two hyphens and a space on a
line by itself. --
It has the purpose of allowing a replying email client to snip off the
sig during a reply. You should
Mike wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats
the html pages.
From the Movie Site page:
meta name=GENERATOR content=Mozilla/4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
[Netscape]
[Ken asks about
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 20.06.2011 04:54, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
snippage
I'd agree that's the case ... but ya never know. I have a site or two
that are completely done in PHP, but all display the pages'
filenames as example.html. It's a simple matter to add a command
to the .htaccess
Jay Garcia wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I'd agree that's the case ... but ya never know. I have a site or
two that are completely done in PHP, but all display the pages'
filenames as example.html. It's a simple matter to add
Jay Garcia wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
# Process .html files as php
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php5 .html .php .htm
The only problem one will run into with that htaccess entry is if
you access a MySQL database from your PHP page(s).
Why would that be? I use MySQL on most
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Uh, oh, I just realized that several of my web pages were made by
automatically converting MS Excel 2003 files using the Save as html
command within Excel. Is that were deadly PHP4 scripts can occur?
Nope. Excel would generate *HTML* (as you said), not PHP, and likely in
PhillipJones wrote:
Not likely. The only other way you could write PHP as described in
other threads is use a Application such as DreamWeaver or RapidWeaver
to do so,
Since neither of those applications has any way to 'compose' intricate
functions and routines, it would be nearly pointless to
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Linux - Puppy - dpup009 - Seamonkey 2.0.14 - laptop/notebook
At the http://www.faithout.com/ site (a Christian-friendly alternative
to Facebook) I went to post a reply on their Discussion Board and
received the following error:
You have an error in your SQL syntax;
NoOp wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Linux - Puppy - dpup009 - Seamonkey 2.0.14 - laptop/notebook
At the http://www.faithout.com/ site (a Christian-friendly
alternative to Facebook) I went to post a reply on their Discussion
Board and received the following
Ken wrote:
Follow-up (at a tangent) to my post just above. I have SM 2.0.14 and
Windows 7.
Just above to you may be meaningful. To others, it probably isn't.
Some may use Hide read messages or sort by date or sort by
subject. Best to mention the Subject line when referencing other posts.
Or
Ken wrote:
Thanks Francesco. That worked well. I located Fonts under Appearance
and changed the minimum size from 17 pixels to 14. ...
The browser window of certain sites no longer has hidden lines of
text (that should be visible) in any sub-windows. Unfortunately the
type-size of text
Ken wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
[...] If you look at the source of your sent message, do you see the
BCCs listed in the headers?
Yes.
Did your test send that BCC to a different address than the one used
in the TO?
No, or it shouldn't have. It was addressed to the same
WLS wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Web authors who do not test their pages with various browser-induced
font sizes are rampant on the WWW. Little do they know that the
web is not paper. :-) It's a losing battle...
There's also those web authors who don't bother
David E. Ross wrote:
When I view ASCII text Web pages that have no explicit line breaks in
the SeaMonkey browser, the pages are displayed without wrapping. Is
there a way to get wrapping?
Insert line feeds where you want them.
An example is at http://rossde.com/test/Wrap_test.txt, which my
JAS wrote:
I received the same email stating my browser was outdated and unsecure
and I needed to update to a secure browser. My info:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19)
Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b2 NOT Firefox/4/0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.0.14 -
You might want to change
Tom S. wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
Tom S. wrote:
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.0.14, with Windows XP Pro SP3. Here is what I
often see when opening an email message for the first time:
http://i55.tinypic.com/2ho8swm.gif
Why do I get a header mess in the message area like this when
pressing
Robert Gault wrote:
Check your setting for the message body, View/Message Body As/Original
HTML. It looks like you have it set for Text.
Mine is always set to Plain Text and the *headers* never show in the
content viewing pane.
I'm still thinking malformed email. shrug
--
-bts
-Four
WLS wrote:
Would like to know how someone can tell the site was made with
Dreamweaver.
I must be that someone. I said, But, the page was written with
DreamWeaver, instead of SeaMonkey Composer.
If you look in the source of the cited page, you will see various bits
of JavaScript included by
Jay Garcia wrote:
Linda wrote:
I have a problem with updating my web page. I get this
553 Can't open that file: No such file or directory
The page I am trying to update www.thuneforsakeri.se
Please help me with this!
[sig trimmed]
Only problem I have is the language, other than that
Paul wrote:
BTW, flash keeps cookies on your computer of every flash site
you have ever visited.
Use the BetterPrivacy extension to remove Flash (LSO) cookies:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/
I've been using it for quite some time. I have the options set to Ask
Ed Mullen wrote:
Get Ccleaner:
http://www.piriform.com/
...Windows users only might apply! ;-)
Here's a page with a lot of details on removing Flash cookies, including
a nice bit on how to set up the BetterPrivacy extension. See section
Delete LSOs in Firefox
W3BNR wrote:
Yahoo upgrading mail service in the near future. Looks like SeaMonkey
will not be supported (as usual). Here's a quote from their page:
You can upgrade now to the newest Yahoo! Mail if your browser is
Internet Explorer 7, Firefox 3, Safari 4, or Chrome 5 or newer.
Please
W3BNR wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
W3BNR wrote:
Yahoo upgrading mail service in the near future. Looks like
SeaMonkey will not be supported (as usual). Here's a quote from
their page:
You can upgrade now to the newest Yahoo! Mail if your browser is
Internet Explorer 7
PhillipJones wrote:
If you have to have spaces, use code for spaces instead %20 then you can
show you link with space but when it actually goes to the link it sees
the 20 [SIC] instead.
What code would you use for a filename space other than %20 ?
Its better to either create the link with
NFN Smith wrote:
Thomas Pamin wrote:
Thus, although you can set the the UA string in prefs.js, my
preference is to do it on the fly with PrefBar, and spoof only
when needed.
I don't see useragent in prefs.js. Do you have to add this line as
new?
I believe that you want
NFN Smith wrote:
For me, I like PrefBar, because there's several other tools there that I
find useful.
Sure. I have it installed also. Have for years and years. The JavaScript
checkbox is most useful. g
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
I don't understand why anyone bothers with gmail or hotmail or
yahoomail when it is so cheap to buy your own Web domain with E-mail
(incl. Web mail).
That way you control the settings ... not to mention matters of
privacy and security ...
Leave the generic E-mail
Aaron wrote:
I deleted my original subscribe email that told me how, can’t remember
myself, and don’t want to continue receiving emails from this list,
so... how do I unsubscribe??
There should be a link at the end of each email you receive.
List-Unsubscribe:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
navoff wrote:
Eh, not sure what you mean about starting a new thread, 'cause I
didn't. I've only replied to this one.
Well, I suppose there are ways to reply where the thread is broken. I
seem to recall that the Google groups interface is one of these ways.
snip
George Carden wrote:
This happened a few minutes ago, and I used the site
http://www.speed.io/index_en.html to conduct a speed test on SeaMonkey
and Internet Explorer, one right after another. Here are the results...
I happened to have Opera open when I read your post. Here's what that
Daniel wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
More about this profiles thing... I just read this news item:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/03/31/google.face
Ray_Net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
Ray_Net wrote:
This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
More about this profiles thing... I just read this news item:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/03/31/google.face/index.html?hpt=Sbin
Google is working on a mobile
Daniel wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Under options for a new message, especially a ForWarDed message
(!), it would be nice to have a show all headers when sending a
419!
What's wrong with View-Headers-All??
(Off to check what a 419 might be!!)
Hopefully, your Google result has already
David E. Ross wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Under options for a new message, especially a ForWarDed message
(!), it would be nice to have a show all headers when sending a
419!
What's wrong with View-Headers-All??
(Off to check what a 419
Rick Merrill wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Under options for a new message, especially a ForWarDed message
(!), it would be nice to have a show all headers when sending
a 419!
What's wrong
Daniel wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Alex wrote:
[snip]
The clicked email link opens in a new window but I don't want to go
back to email but start navigating within the browser and it
doesn't work.
So then, I've already answered your question. You open the clicked
link in a new
Alex wrote:
Since SM 2.0.12 release, when I click on any link in my email and open
the browser and subsequently clink on the link within the browser
the Back and Forward buttons are grayed out.
When I start first the browser all is OK.
I wonder if this is only an issue with my set up or
Alex wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Alex wrote:
Since SM 2.0.12 release, when I click on any link in my email and
open the browser and subsequently clink on the link within the
browser the Back and Forward buttons are grayed out.
When I start first the browser all is OK.
I wonder
PhillipJones wrote:
http://www.zdnetSNIP
Phillip, please stop spreading FUD. See responses to your other post
about this article.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Daniel wrote:
When this was first proposed, I thought Why??, and was against it,
but I guess fixing the Internet was realised to be to big a problem!!
Please do note that the problem is not the Internet (is only the WWW)
but only a very small percentage of webmasters without clue.
You can
Richard Lee Holbert wrote:
I am running SeaMonkey 1.1.18 and ...
Richard, it seems obvious that your charter.net email service thinks
posts received from the Mozilla list are spam, due to misconfigured
spam-blocking software, as it is adding [!! SPAM] to your received
Subject line. As you
nitebell wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
nitebell wrote:
just installer SeaMonkey/2.0.12 and it will not save login or
passwords.
any thoughts?
Email? Browser? If (2), all sites or only some?
Browser, most all sites
Try this: just after you've logged into a site and asked
Marisa Ciceran wrote:
Correction, I had to go back and again untick the scanning of outgoing
email by Avast.
There is no need to set your a-v program to scan outgoing email.
Incoming, either. If the program is running resident, it would find any
viruses attached to the email if you tried to
upscope wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
hapihakr wrote:
Use the user agent string option to masquerade as Firefox. The
following command will execute on Linux. Windows may be slightly
different (both executable program and user
hapihakr wrote:
Use the user agent string option to masquerade as Firefox. The
following command will execute on Linux. Windows may be slightly
different (both executable program and user agent string).
google-chrome --user-agent=Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13)
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
hapihakr wrote:
Use the user agent string option to masquerade as Firefox. The
following command will execute on Linux. Windows may be slightly
different (both executable program and user agent string).
google-chrome --user-agent
Willard wrote:
Connection to server msnews.microsoft.com timed out
How can this be fixed??
It can't. Microsoft closed down its news server last year. They replaced
it, and all their groups, with some silly web forums.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
Ray_Net wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Willard wrote:
Connection to server msnews.microsoft.com timed out
How can this be fixed??
It can't. Microsoft closed down its news server last year. They
replaced it, and all their groups, with some silly web forums.
This the beginning
Daniel wrote:
RebootJob done.
Reboot Windows? Not necessary; just close and restart the browser.
--
-bts
-Given enough coffee, I could rule the world...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Daniel wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Daniel wrote:
RebootJob done.
Reboot Windows? Not necessary; just close and restart the browser.
Would you believe...I thought that was the case but figured
no harm done to re-boot.
Actually, restarting the browser is not even
Ray_Net wrote:
[snippage]
I suspect that his SM inbox is full. Perhaps full of non compacted
messages.
How can an Inbox be full? Other than restricted by operating system
file size (depends on OS), there should be no limit to number of
messages, as I understand it... 'Tis just one file,
Chris Bluemel wrote:
I am in the process of creating a webpage using SeaMonkey. Usually I
can change the text colour very easily, but this does not seem to be
the case with a Link - I seem to have no control of the text colour
for a link. When I select a new colour, it is not applied, it
David E. Ross wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Anyone have a workaround to print coupons using Linux and Seamonkey
from this site?
http://www.coupons.com/
What clowns would write such inadequate code anyhow?
My wife would like access to them and I don't allow anything from
the
Beauregard T. Shagnasty replied to hisself:
Attempting to see just how this coupon site works, I found:
I forgot to mention that the site left 22 cookies in my browser .. and
that was without actually ever printing, or even looking at, any
coupons!
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body
Tom Pamin wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
All of a sudden, visited links in forums, etc. are not showing in a
different color. I cleared history and checked the number of days to
save visited pages. Any ideas?
Here's an example:
http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/
In that example, all
David E. Ross wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
This is bug #533490.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533490.
I am curious... what is the worth of creating a Mozilla bug report
for a matter that is obviously the fault of the web site author's
David E. Ross wrote:
.. Of course, that will hide the fact that SeaMonkey is in use and
lead Web developers to ignore SeaMonkey.
That's also a reason I frequently dispute folks when they say just set
it to mask as IE and fuggetaboutit. :-/
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two
Ray_Net wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
.. Of course, that will hide the fact that SeaMonkey is in use and
lead Web developers to ignore SeaMonkey.
That's also a reason I frequently dispute folks when they say just
set it to mask as IE and fuggetaboutit
Stan wrote:
Seems like there are a number of sites where they tell me I need
JavaScript enabled. I check Preferences/Advanced/Scripts and Plugins
and it is enabled.
For example, at the very bottom of this page:
http://www.capecodfactoryoutlet.com/index.php/store-directory
That
Max ludz wrote:
The Seamonkey Newsgroup Police
How about if you stop quoting spam that a lot of us would not have
otherwise even been aware of? At the very least be smart enough to
*trim* the crap.
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
--
-bts
-This poast is valid through
Phillip Jones wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Max ludz wrote:
The Seamonkey Newsgroup Police
How about if you stop quoting spam that a lot of us would not have
otherwise even been aware of? At the very least be smart enough to
*trim* the crap.
http://twovoyagers.com/improve
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
More and more sites are taking longer to load because
they are saddled with some Google-garbage called
Google analytics.
You can also add them to your HOSTS file, which will cover all your
browsers.
# block google ads. add additional servers as found.
127.0.0.1
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:11:59 +0800 (WST), /Bret Busby/:
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, WLS wrote:
Pure FUD!
?
I guess WLS was answering to:
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:56:22 +0800 (WST), /Bret Busby/:
I understood that SUSE is now owned by Microsoft, and is thence, likely
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
/Beauregard T. Shagnasty/:
Mr Busby posted via the email mailing list entry point using:
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
rather than a newsreader. Perhaps it strips off end-of-line spaces
like, um, Outlook Express ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
/Beauregard T. Shagnasty/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Actually Outlook Express doesn't strip the space after the standard
sig' delimiter and even supports format=flowed to some extend for
some years now. I don't have references handy to backup these
statements
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Jamey Fletcher wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
I was looking at the stats for my small business website and only
about 2.5% of visits come from people using SM.
I don't know about you, but I can't afford to turn away 2.5% of my
potential customers.
The assumption is
David E. Ross wrote:
By the way, you should have only ONE blank after the dashes in the
line before your signature. The convention in RFC 3676 (Section 4.3)
is dash-dash-space (-- ).
Looks like it might be a keyboarding error whilst composing with
JohnW-Mpls's posts. In this thread, he has
Phillip Jones wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Ant wrote:
I just accidently pressed ctrl-T and got a tab in it. Am I the
last user to know this? Did SM1 and Mozilla have this too? :(
No SM couldn't thank goodness
Phillip Jones wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 11/27/2010 8:52 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Ant wrote:
I just accidently pressed ctrl-T and got a tab in it. Am I the last
user to know this? Did SM1 and Mozilla have this too? :(
No SM couldn't thank goodness.
I don't even use tabs in
Rufus wrote:
Lets SM appear to be any browser you choose.
True, but don't do something silly like set it to Internet Explorer all
the time and be boosting up its results at the web counter sites...
Set it back to SeaMonkey after you leave the problem site.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry
WLS wrote:
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is Seamonkey considered defunct now?
No.
I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots.
Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it.
Works fine here.
The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't
recognize any but
WLS wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Adding the oft-mentioned NOT Firefox to the SeaMonkey User Agent
string might help. WLS, have you done this?
It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration.
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre)
Gecko
Jane_Galt wrote:
Is anyone else getting a parsing error at this site?:
http://www.memory4less.com/
New problem, eh? I see the same error in several browsers.
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Arnie Goetchius wrote:
However, I still get incompatible browser error message when
logging into http://adwords.google.com with SM 2.1. No error
message if I log in with FF 3.6
I get 404s for both of those 'adwords' URLs ... no error
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Does a 504 Geteway Time-out nginc/0.7.65 mean the
problem is http://veetle.com or local?
This site will be handy for questions like that one:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
--
-bts
-it's not you
___
support-seamonkey
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Oh, and by the way, you didn't Fall Back...
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Ant wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty typed:
You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want
to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one
at a time.
Yes, I want to show eahc reciever's [sic] e-mail from a single mass
e-mail. Darn, there's no way
Hana Skoumalova wrote:
I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with
displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed
correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is pushed
to the right into the text.
It works fine for me, in several
Ant wrote:
I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not
show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I
entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send
to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know
it is a
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty a écrit :
Hana Skoumalova wrote:
I use SM 2.0.3 on Linux and I encountered a strange problem with
displaying items in ordered list (ol). Twelve items are displayed
correctly, but the thirteenth looks strange: the number 13 is
pushed to the right
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place
your own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to
multiple BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each
*recipient's* name in the TO: field
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Beauregard wrote:
doc wrote:
My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the
ISP-level.
Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients?
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine
for almost 2 years,
David E. Ross wrote:
In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags. They
are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag soup.
I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All
elements should be closed, having an opening tag and a closing tag. If
you
David E. Ross wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
In any case, get rid of the /p, /li, /dd, and /dt tags.
They are not needed. Their presence makes your page look like tag
soup.
I agree with the rest of what you wrote, except for the above. All
elements should
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/
There is either a non-obvious block or an app not responding.
Michael Lueck wrote:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on
URL links in SM emails?
Hm. Begs the question then, why would you use SeaMonkey for mail/news
and not Thunderbird?
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
? Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
http://kiwanisogeecheefair.org/minibooth.html
I updated libflashplayer to the latest
I do not see any Flash on the page.
and added fonts, still there is text overwrite midway down the page.
Is there something I can tweak in Seamonkey, or an add-on I can load,
I
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
Since I'm not a member of your religion, I'll save you the minimal
time that would have been needed to add me to your kill list and
leave.
Please don't punish the rest of us. If Jay doesn't like your posts,
he can skip them or
JAS wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
When I launch SM 2.08, nothing happens for a few seconds or a minute,
and then the program pops up fully formed.
Mine is the same and takes over 2 min. to load and then just pops up.
IE6 takes about 20 sec. but I used SM always.
You two are both using
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
JAS wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
When I launch SM 2.08, nothing happens for a few seconds or a
minute, and then the program pops up fully formed.
Mine is the same and takes over 2 min. to load and then just pops
up. IE6 takes
cqbrodie wrote:
I had a PC crash two days ago
What happened?
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
The first three of the links here do not work and the second
three do not.
Is it SM 2.0.8 or his HTML?
http://www.n2ckh.com/
His source code looks OK:
A HREF=http:\\www.n2ckh.com/FORSALE/AMPLIFIERS/hfamplifiers.htmHF
Amplifiers/A
That is on page:
501 - 600 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
