two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Henry
I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey.  I notice 
in my profile that I have two .slt folders.  One has only a folder 
called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache.  The other has many, 
many items including bookmarks etc.


Should I have two .slt folders and will that give me trouble when I 
install SeaMonkey? Should I do anything about them or just leave both 
of them?


Thanks.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-13 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:

I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey.  I notice 
in my profile that I have two .slt folders.  One has only a folder 
called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache.  The other has many, 
many items including bookmarks etc.


Should I have two .slt folders and will that give me trouble when I 
install SeaMonkey? Should I do anything about them or just leave both 
of them?


Thanks.

Henry



when you say mozilla, do you mean the old Mozilla Suite, or Mozilla 
Firefox?




Mozilla 1.8.1.11 suite

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-14 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:

I'm still running Mozilla and want to change to SeaMonkey.  I notice 
in my profile that I have two .slt folders.  One has only a folder 
called Trash and a folder called Trash.cache.  The other has many, 
many items including bookmarks etc.


Should I have two .slt folders and will that give me trouble when I 
install SeaMonkey? Should I do anything about them or just leave 
both of them?


Thanks.

Henry




when you say mozilla, do you mean the old Mozilla Suite, or Mozilla 
Firefox?




Mozilla 1.8.1.11 suite

Henry



I have no idea what 1.8.1.11 is.  Mozilla Suite never went that high.  
It was either Mozilla 1.7.13 which was the last official release or 
1.8ba which never made it to release.


So, I'm presuming you have the old Mozilla Suite.  If so, then close 
Mozilla, and click on the windows start button, then run and enter:


mozilla.exe -p

this will start the Mozilla Profile Manager.  How many profiles do you 
see? If one, then go ahead and delete the .slt folder with the 
trash.cache in it.  I'm presuming that is when you deleted the cache, 
this is the directory that it created.


Otherwise, go ahead and install SM.  It will pick up your last Mozilla 
Suite profile and start using that.




When I run  mozilla.exe -p in the run box, all I get is my Mozilla 
home page.  I get nothing about profile manager.


Also, I checked under help/about Mozilla and I am running Mozilla 1.8.1.11

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-14 Thread Henry

Mark Hansen wrote:


On 04/14/09 08:12, Henry wrote:

When I run  mozilla.exe -p in the run box, all I get is my Mozilla 
home page.  I get nothing about profile manager.


Also, I checked under help/about Mozilla and I am running Mozilla 1.8.1.11

Henry



When you run Mozilla, to you have a "Switch Profile" on the "Tools" menu?
If so, that will launch the Profile Manager as well.

I found that.  When I open it I get a box that's labeled "Available 
Profiles" and in that box all that's listed is "default".  It doesn't 
say anything about .slt folders.  So my question is, since I have two 
.slt folders in my profile, which one is correct?  The one full of 
lots of stuff or the one that only has in it a folder called Trash and 
a folder called Trash.cache? Do I need both?  Do other people have two?


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: two .slt folders

2009-04-14 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

If so, then close Mozilla, 



When I run  mozilla.exe -p in the run box, all I get is my Mozilla 
home page.  I get nothing about profile manager.



I guess you missed those little words


No, I closed Mozilla before I ran mozilla.exe -p

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Trouble with URL

2009-05-27 Thread Henry

I'm using WinXP Pro on a Dell 2.7GHz machine with 2G RAM.

I'm using Mozilla 1.8.1.11 with agent switcher to make it look like 
Firefox 2.0.0.11


I have Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.22.87 and Adobe Shockwave 
Player version 11.5.0.596 running.


Until two days ago the following URL worked like a charm:

http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=INDEXDJX:DJI

Now the page comes up but without the graph that was always there before.

Will some one please help me with this?

Thanks

Henry

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Trouble with URL

2009-05-27 Thread Henry

David E. Ross wrote:

On 5/27/2009 9:49 AM, Henry wrote:


I'm using WinXP Pro on a Dell 2.7GHz machine with 2G RAM.

I'm using Mozilla 1.8.1.11 with agent switcher to make it look like 
Firefox 2.0.0.11


I have Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.22.87 and Adobe Shockwave 
Player version 11.5.0.596 running.


Until two days ago the following URL worked like a charm:

http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=INDEXDJX:DJI

Now the page comes up but without the graph that was always there before.

Will some one please help me with this?

Thanks

Henry




Are you using FlashBlock or have you set PrefBar to block Flash?  (I
have FlashBlock and PrefBar installed, with an option on the latter to
enable the former.  In this case, I requested FlashBlock to display the
Flash presentation that contains the graphic by clicking on the
right-pointing triangle that appeared when my cursor moved over the
script f.)

When you use the SeaMonkey menu bar to select [Help > About Plug-ins],
do you see the Flash plugin NPSWF32.dll?  (No, it does NOT have to be in
the SeaMonkey plugin directory.)

I have no problem seeing the graph.  My configuration is:

Windows XP Home Edition 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
800x600 screen, 32-bit true colors
AVG Anti-Virus 8.5.339

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21)
Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16
with Menu, Navigation, Status, and PrefBar bars displayed
Cookies for the originating Web site only
No firewall or proxy

Java J2SE RTE 6 update 13 (full version 1.6.0_13-b03, file and product
versions 6.0.130.3)

Flash 10.0.22.87 (10.0 r22)

Extensions:
Adblock Plus 1.0.1
FlashBlock 1.3.13
LiveHTTPHeaders 0.13.1
Mnenhy 0.7.6
PrefBar 4.1.1:
Unrequested popups suppressed
Images from the originating server only
FlashBlock enabled
etc
Show (Master) Passwords 0.1.2


I'm not running FlashBlock or Adblock.

I'm not running SeaMonkey but Mozilla 1.8.1.11 with agent switcher to 
make it look like Firefox 2.0.0.11


I have the same Flash as you do.

I'm running Mnenhy.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Trouble with URL

2009-05-27 Thread Henry

David E. Ross wrote:


On 5/27/2009 4:53 PM, Henry wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 5/27/2009 9:49 AM, Henry wrote:



I'm using WinXP Pro on a Dell 2.7GHz machine with 2G RAM.

I'm using Mozilla 1.8.1.11 with agent switcher to make it look like 
Firefox 2.0.0.11


I have Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.22.87 and Adobe Shockwave 
Player version 11.5.0.596 running.


Until two days ago the following URL worked like a charm:

http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=INDEXDJX:DJI

Now the page comes up but without the graph that was always there before.

Will some one please help me with this?

Thanks

Henry



Are you using FlashBlock or have you set PrefBar to block Flash?  (I
have FlashBlock and PrefBar installed, with an option on the latter to
enable the former.  In this case, I requested FlashBlock to display the
Flash presentation that contains the graphic by clicking on the
right-pointing triangle that appeared when my cursor moved over the
script f.)

When you use the SeaMonkey menu bar to select [Help > About Plug-ins],
do you see the Flash plugin NPSWF32.dll?  (No, it does NOT have to be in
the SeaMonkey plugin directory.)

I have no problem seeing the graph.  My configuration is:

Windows XP Home Edition 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
800x600 screen, 32-bit true colors
AVG Anti-Virus 8.5.339

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21)
Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16
with Menu, Navigation, Status, and PrefBar bars displayed
Cookies for the originating Web site only
No firewall or proxy

Java J2SE RTE 6 update 13 (full version 1.6.0_13-b03, file and product
versions 6.0.130.3)

Flash 10.0.22.87 (10.0 r22)

Extensions:
Adblock Plus 1.0.1
FlashBlock 1.3.13
LiveHTTPHeaders 0.13.1
Mnenhy 0.7.6
PrefBar 4.1.1:
Unrequested popups suppressed
Images from the originating server only
FlashBlock enabled
etc
Show (Master) Passwords 0.1.2



I'm not running FlashBlock or Adblock.

I'm not running SeaMonkey but Mozilla 1.8.1.11 with agent switcher to 
make it look like Firefox 2.0.0.11


I have the same Flash as you do.

I'm running Mnenhy.

Henry



At About Plugins, do you see the Flash .dll file?

I just now spoofed Firefox 2.0.0.18.  Everything works okay, including
the graph.


Yes, I have File name: NPSWF32.dll Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22

Where did you get the spoof for Firefox 2.0.0.18?  Mine is for 
2.0.0.11. I went to the agent switcher page and got agent switcher 
that made it look like Firefox 2.0.0.11.


Thanks

Henry

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Upgrading to SeaMonkey 1.17

2009-08-22 Thread Henry

I am running WinXP Pro on a Dell 2.8 GHz machine with 2G memory.

I am running Mozilla ver. 1.8.1.11 and want to upgrade to SeaMonkey 
1.1.17.  I'm confused about whether I have to un-install Mozilla first 
or if I can install SeaMonkey and will be OK if I don't open both 
programs at the same time.  I'd like to be sure SeaMonkey has picked 
up my profile before I un-install Mozilla.


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrading to SeaMonkey 1.17

2009-08-22 Thread Henry

Jens Hatlak wrote:


On 8/22/2009 6:28 PM Henry wrote:


I am running Mozilla ver. 1.8.1.11



No such Mozilla version has ever been made public (the last one was 
1.7.13). Looking at your User-Agent string I guess you mean Firefox 
2.0.0.11.


and want to upgrade to SeaMonkey 1.1.17.  I'm confused about whether I 
have to un-install Mozilla first or if I can install SeaMonkey and 
will be OK if I don't open both programs at the same time.  I'd like 
to be sure SeaMonkey has picked up my profile before I un-install 
Mozilla.



You can run Firefox and SeaMonkey in parallel without any problem. You 
can install/uninstall either one without affecting the other. SeaMonkey 
won't pick up the Firefox profile, though. Instead you have to transfer 
it manually:

<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_SeaMonkey>

In case you are really talking about Mozilla (a.k.a. as the Mozilla 
Application Suite): SeaMonkey will pick up and continue to use the 
Mozilla profiles you have. As long as you install SeaMonkey into a 
different location than Mozilla and stop using Mozilla after first 
having used one of its profiles with SeaMonkey the change should be 
smooth. You can then uninstall Mozilla at any time, the profiles won't 
be touched by that.


HTH

Jens

There was a Mozilla ver. 1.8.1.11 and I'm running it using User Agent 
Switcher to make it look like I'm running Firefox 2.0.0.11.


So I guess the last part of your answer applies.  Are you saying that 
if I install SeaMonkey and use the Mozilla profile even one time that 
I can't use Mozilla again without screwing up the works?


The purpose of my query was that I want to make sure SeaMonkey works 
before I un-install Mozilla.  If it doesn't work right what should I 
do un_install it and try again?


Henry

Sorry to be so dumb, but I don't want to loose my profile.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrading to SeaMonkey 1.17

2009-08-22 Thread Henry

Jens Hatlak wrote:

On 8/22/2009 11:48 PM Henry wrote:



No, 1.7.13 was the last Mozilla version, believe me. User Agent Switcher
probably also changed the Gecko version in addition to adding 
"Firefox/2.0.0.11". Anyway...


No, Ver. 1.8.11 was issued.  Please ask Robert Kaiser for 
conformation. This was discussed on earlier posts.


Thanks for your help, I may be back after I read your suggested URL's.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Making new profile for SeaMonkey

2009-08-23 Thread Henry
I'm now confused about making a new profile for SeaMonkey from my 
Mozilla profile. I read the "How do I import my profile info from the 
Mozilla Application Suite or Netscape7?" section and am still confused.


My Mozilla profile is now in C;\Documents and 
settings\Henry\application\Data\Mozilla\Profiles|Default User.


I get to the part in the Create Profile Wizard that wants me to Enter 
a new profile name:


I'm stuck right there and I don't know what the next question will be 
and I'll be stuck again.


Will some one please walk me through the next steps? Do I just some 
how put SeaMonkey in or put SeaMonkey in the above string where 
Mozilla is now?


I haven't installed SeaMonkey yet.

Thanks for your patience.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: A question about Incoming Mail

2009-10-03 Thread Henry

DoctorBill wrote:

Daniel wrote:


DoctorBill wrote:


DoctorBill wrote:


I am on several people's Joke Lists and get some really good stuff
that I would like to pass on - so I use "Edit Message as New"

I strip out all the forwarded addresses everyone leaves in them
(nice source of E-Mail addresses for spammers).

Many of these things are some kind of framed large letters with
cartoons things which I don't know how to "Edit".

They seem to have been copied over and over or else messed with
such that they have multiple "Frames" around them.

I can delete some frames with the SM E-Mail editor, but some of this
stuff seems graphically linked together and won't allow much 
manipulation.


Use this (Alkaspace) hosting link to see what I mean.
http://alkaspace.com/is.php?i=81159&img=Joke_frame.jpg

What the Heck program was used to set these kinds of things up ?
Is this from Outlook Express ?

If so, how could I transfer one of these to that program to modify
or clean it up ? and then put it back into SM's mail to send out?

Not a big deal...would like to know.

DoctorbIll

If you notice these emails are in MIME.  If anyone knows how to edit 
it I'd like to know.  If you look at it with a text editor you'll see 
strange lines and the text in text format and then the text in HTML 
and then if there is/are a picture/s you'll see a large amount of 
letters and numbers that make up the picture/s.


For some reason if I email it to my wife who uses Outlook (not OE) she 
can remove the headers and footers and then send it back to me in 
clean form.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Mozilla to Seamonkey question

2010-02-21 Thread Henry

Dell 2.8GHz computer with 3G RAM running WinXP Pro SP2.

I'm still using Mozilla 1.7.8.  Should I upgrade to 1.1.18 before I go 
to 2.03?  What problems will I have doing this? Can I just run the 
set-up program for 2.03 and it will find my Mozilla profile?


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Multiple passwords

2010-06-02 Thread Henry
When I look in password manager I have a number of passwords that are 
duplicated.  Is is safe to delete the duplicates, or is there a reason 
for them being there?


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple passwords

2010-06-02 Thread Henry

What should I do about these kinds of entries please?


HOSTUSER NAME
https://www.officemaxperks.com  
https://www.officemaxperks.com  wa0...@arrl.net

Notice the first one doesn't have a user name.

Henry


David E. Ross wrote:


On 6/2/10 4:28 PM, Henry wrote:

When I look in password manager I have a number of passwords that are 
duplicated.  Is is safe to delete the duplicates, or is there a reason 
for them being there?


Thanks

Henry



If they are truly duplicates -- identical for both site URI, user ID and
password -- yes, you may delete the excess entries.

Normally, you cannot actually have two entries with the same site URI
and user ID but with different passwords.  If you find such an entry, be
sure to delete the one with the WRONG password.

From my own experience, certain sites cause duplicate entries.  These
generally involve having form inputs and login inputs both on the same
Web page.  The next time I observe this, I might submit a bug report.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Multiple passwords

2010-06-03 Thread Henry

Daniel wrote:


Henry wrote:



David E. Ross wrote:


On 6/2/10 4:28 PM, Henry wrote:


When I look in password manager I have a number of passwords that are
duplicated. Is is safe to delete the duplicates, or is there a reason
for them being there?

Thanks

Henry




If they are truly duplicates -- identical for both site URI, user ID and
password -- yes, you may delete the excess entries.

Normally, you cannot actually have two entries with the same site URI
and user ID but with different passwords. If you find such an entry, be
sure to delete the one with the WRONG password.

From my own experience, certain sites cause duplicate entries. These
generally involve having form inputs and login inputs both on the same
Web page. The next time I observe this, I might submit a bug report.



(Cut and pasted to preserve thread-flow)
 > What should I do about these kinds of entries please?
 >
 >
 > HOST USER NAME
 > https://www.officemaxperks.com
 > https://www.officemaxperks.com wa0...@arrl.net
 >
 > Notice the first one doesn't have a user name.
 >
 > Henry
 >

Henry, did you also have to enter a "user name" for this site??

In the password manager (Tools->Password Manager->Manage Stored 
Passwords), for some of my accounts, I have to enter a "user name" and a 
"password", but unless I select the "Show Passwords" button, they just 
show as blank entries, just like yours.


HTH

Daniel
Yes I have to enter a password for these sites.  It is the same 
password for both entries.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro 
SP2.


I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will 
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions 
come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked 
out.


Henry


d...@kd4e.com wrote:


Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going
through the hassle?

 > David E. Ross wrote:


On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote:


I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro
SP2.

I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04.  Will
that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first?

Thanks

Henry



I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself
and a different directory for the profile.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.4 Release -- New Features and Fixes

2011-09-27 Thread Henry
Will all sites now recognize this browser?  For example Comcast.net which 
doesn't list Seamonkey as one it supports.


Can I go from Mozilla 1.7 to Seamonkey 2.4 directly?

Henry



Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.4: The new major 
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! 
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it 
delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5, 
hardware acceleration and improved JavaScript speed.


SeaMonkey 2.4 is available in 24 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X and 
Linux.


Most notably, this release features for the first time:

Drastically improved memory use
Added a new rendering backend to speed up Canvas operations on 
Windows systems

Bookmark and password changes now sync almost instantly when using Sync
Added support for text-overflow: ellipsis
Added support for the Web Timing specification
Fixed several stability issues.
Fixed several security issues.
Fixed several high visibility usability issues from SeaMonkey 2.3.

For a more complete list of major changes in SeaMonkey 2.4, see the 
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.4 section of the Release Notes, which also 
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked 
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and 
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.


Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2011-09-27

Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

Release notes:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.4

System Requirements:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Default Browser

2011-09-30 Thread Henry
I'm still using Mozilla 1.78.  I only use the mail and newsgroup section. 
How do I get Mozilla not to be my default browser please?  I don't want to go 
to SeaMonkey.


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Default Browser

2011-10-01 Thread Henry
Thanks, but I want to "un-default" Mozilla.  I'm going back to IE8.  I've 
been monitoring this Seamonkey group for a while and there seem to be nothing 
but problems.  I don't want to loose my email addresses and bookmarks during 
an upgrade.  So if there is a way to tell Mozilla it's not the default, I 
would appreciate knowing it.  I've tried making IE8 the default, but Mozilla 
won't let go.


Henry


MCBastos wrote:


Interviewed by CNN on 30/09/2011 21:24, Henry told the world:

I'm still using Mozilla 1.78.  I only use the mail and newsgroup section. 
How do I get Mozilla not to be my default browser please?  I don't want to go 
to SeaMonkey.



Well, I'm not quite sure of what you mean here, but...

If you don't want to click on a link in a message in Mozilla 1.78 Mail
and the site to be opened on the Mozilla 1.78 browser, I think you are
out of luck. While I remember some talk about an obscure setting to make
Seamonkey open links in mail on an external browser, this old version
might not support it.

Anyway, Mozilla 1.7.8 is quite an old product, I believe about six years
old, give or take. There have been numerous improvements since then,
both in features and security. You really should consider moving to a
newer product.

If you use only the mail and newsgroup parts of Mozilla/Seamonkey, you
might consider trying Thunderbird -- it does not include a browser, web
editor or chatzilla, so those components won't "take over" anything.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Default Browser

2011-10-01 Thread Henry

Otto Wyss wrote:

Henry wrote:


Thanks, but I want to "un-default" Mozilla.  I'm going back to IE8.



To unset Mozilla as default browser just start any browser you wish and 
then set it there "as your default" browser. At least IE allows it.


I tried setting IE8 as the default but Mozilla won't give up being my 
default. If I close Mozilla and IE8 after setting IE8 as the default, when I 
click on a hyperlink, Mozilla opens even with IE8 already opened.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Is it time to focus on a SeaMonkey stability release?

2011-10-25 Thread Henry
It's time for Seamonkey to just do security and stability releases like IE8 
does instead of having to update new versions all the time.  It's confusing 
and scary.  I'm still back at Mozilla 1.78 for my email and newsgroups and 
use IE8 for my browser because after following this group I'm afraid to up grade.


Henry



Paul Bergsagel wrote:

I was reading this Firefox article 
http://mashable.com/2011/09/27/firefox-7/ "Firefox 7 Is Here: Will It 
Stop Hogging Memory & Let You Browse Faster? [REVIEW]" Please read some 
of the comments below the article.


This article made me wonder how many of the issues/problems discussed 
with Firefox are also problems found in SeaMonkey?


Questions:

1. What are your experiences with SeaMonkey compared to other browsers 
such as Chrome, Opera, or other modern browser?


2. In your experience is SeaMonkey a memory hog? is is slow (i.e. slow 
to open webpages)?


3. Is SeaMonkey improving or getting worse with each version?

Topic for discussion:
Apple set a goal for Mac OS X Leopard (v 10.5) that this release would 
not focus on adding new features to the operating system but would focus 
on stability. The result was that when Leopard was released it was one 
of the better OS releases, since it was very stable. Should the 
SeaMonkey (Firefox?) developers follow Apple's lead and take a pause in 
the development of the application and focus for a couple of releases 
only on stability issues (and security issues) rather than developing 
new features?


I think it is time to pause the development of SeaMonkey and focus the 
next few releases on stabilizing the application.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password dump

2011-11-15 Thread Henry

David E. Ross wrote:


On 11/15/11 5:29 PM, Ray Davison wrote:

How can I dump the password file to a text file?  I tried the files and 
info from here but have not gotten anything useful.

http://www.sqlite.org/

Ray



Password Exporter at
<https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/password-exporter/>.


Will this work on the old Mozilla 1.78?

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Comcast Smartzone

2009-01-15 Thread Henry

Sorry to post here but I can't get post to Mozilla NG.

I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 and agent switcher 0.6.10 set to Firefox 
2.0.0.11 on WinXP Pro.


When I go to Comcast home page, I can log in OK, but when I click on 
email it goes to Smartzone, but Smartzone doesn't load, it just sits 
and looks a me.  Everything works with IE6.  Any one else having this 
problem.  Comcast doesn't support Mozilla as we all know, so the guy 
there said "too bad" use IE.


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Comcast Smartzone

2009-01-15 Thread Henry
If people are replying to me, their replys are not getting through. 
When I download the NG it shows the number of messages.  When I click 
on the NG some of the messages disappear. If you have replied via the 
NG, please reply via my email address.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Comcast Smartzone

2009-01-16 Thread Henry

Rick Merrill wrote:

Henry wrote:


Sorry to post here but I can't get post to Mozilla NG.

I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 and agent switcher 0.6.10 set to Firefox 
2.0.0.11 on WinXP Pro.


When I go to Comcast home page, I can log in OK, but when I click on 
email it goes to Smartzone, but Smartzone doesn't load, it just sits 
and looks a me.  Everything works with IE6.  Any one else having this 
problem.  Comcast doesn't support Mozilla as we all know, so the guy 
there said "too bad" use IE.


Thanks

Henry



Did you try the server
news.motzarella.org
and the group
alt.online-service.comcast
?

news.motzarella.org works fine.  I've been using it for some time now.
I'll try posting to alt.online-service.comcast for a solution.

I'm having trouble getting to Comcast Smartzone, which isn't a NG but 
their email program.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Attachments with Mozilla

2009-03-01 Thread Henry
I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine.  Until yesterday 
when I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip 
would show and I could open the attachment.  Starting yesterday, when 
I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would 
show but the box would be blank.  No attachment was there.  What did I 
do to cause the attachment not to show please?  I know my Mozilla is 
old, but I'm happy with it, and truthfully afraid to change because 
I'm one of those people that when I change something everything goes 
to pot.


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Attachments with Mozilla

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Bush wrote:

Henry wrote:

I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine.  Until yesterday 
when I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip 
would show and I could open the attachment.  Starting yesterday, when 
I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would 
show but the box would be blank.  No attachment was there.  What did I 
do to cause the attachment not to show please?  I know my Mozilla is 
old, but I'm happy with it, and truthfully afraid to change because 
I'm one of those people that when I change something everything goes 
to pot.


Thanks

Henry


View/ Display attachments inline


It is already checked. Thank you.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Password manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry
In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry for a site, can 
you delete all but one?  There are some sites for which I have 3 and 4 
entries listed.


I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine.I know my Mozilla 
is old, but I'm happy with it, and truthfully afraid to change because 
I'm one of those people that when I change something everything goes 
to pot.


Thank you.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Password Manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry
In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry for a site, can 
you delete all but one?  There are some sites I have 3 and 4 entries 
listed.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry
for a site, can you delete all but one?  There are
some sites I have 3 and 4 entries listed.



and your question is what?


My question is can I remove the extra Password Manager entries for the 
same site and just leave one site listed in Password Manager or does 
Password Manager use more than one entry for some reason?


Henry


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Bill Davidsen wrote:


Henry wrote:

In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry for a site, can 
you delete all but one?  There are some sites for which I have 3 and 4 
entries listed.


I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine.I know my Mozilla 
is old, but I'm happy with it, and truthfully afraid to change because 
I'm one of those people that when I change something everything goes 
to pot.


I would be afraid that they are not really duplicates, but you can't see 
the difference. That is museum artifact code you have there.


I'm sorry I don't know what a museum artifact code is.  I take it you 
suggest I leave the duplicates.



Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry
for a site, can you delete all but one?  There are
some sites I have 3 and 4 entries listed.




and your question is what?



My question is can I remove the extra Password Manager entries for the 
same site and just leave one site listed in Password Manager or does 
Password Manager use more than one entry for some reason?


Henry




you can remove whatever you want to remove

I got this reply from Bill Davidson. "I would be afraid that they are 
not really duplicates, but you can't see the difference. That is 
museum artifact code you have there."


I don't know what that means, but it makes me afraid to delete the 
duplicate entries.  Can I do harm? Please explain.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry
for a site, can you delete all but one?  There are
some sites I have 3 and 4 entries listed.





and your question is what?




My question is can I remove the extra Password Manager entries for 
the same site and just leave one site listed in Password Manager or 
does Password Manager use more than one entry for some reason?


Henry




you can remove whatever you want to remove

I got this reply from Bill Davidson. "I would be afraid that they are 
not really duplicates, but you can't see the difference. That is 
museum artifact code you have there."


I don't know what that means, but it makes me afraid to delete the 
duplicate entries.  Can I do harm? Please explain.


Henry



take a look at each entry and make sure they're not duplicates.  If 
they're dups, then delete them.  If they're not dups, and each one is 
different, then don't delete them.  For example, you may log into 
hotmail.com, but the server may be live.2.com or live.3.com or something 
similar.


As for "museum artifact code" he's talking about the password manager it 
self.  The code is ancient and belongs in a museum.


If you want to see your passwords better, then I've attached something 
that works great.  Just save it to your hard drive, then use the 
Browser, and click on File, Open File, find the file, and open it from 
there.  It will give you a list of all your passwords.  A lot better 
than the current password manager, imo though!





*MOZILLA PASSWORD INFORMATION*

Produced by /display_moz_passwords.html/ (by "ernie" - Andrew Poth - Ed 
Mullen)


*Host*  *User name* *Password*

The program you attached works great.  Here are some entries (without 
passwords) that I have.  Can I delete all but one of each of them?


https://www.comcast.com wa0...@arrl.net 
https://www.comcast.com wa0...@arrl.net
https://www.paypal.com  1   
https://www.paypal.com  wa0...@arrl.net 
https://www.paypal.com  1   
https://www.paypal.com  1   
https://www.paypal.com  1

This is where I don't know what's safe to delete.

Thanks for you program.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2009-03-01 Thread Henry

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


Henry wrote:


In Password Manager, if you have more than one entry
for a site, can you delete all but one?  There are
some sites I have 3 and 4 entries listed.






and your question is what?





My question is can I remove the extra Password Manager entries for 
the same site and just leave one site listed in Password Manager 
or does Password Manager use more than one entry for some reason?


Henry




you can remove whatever you want to remove

I got this reply from Bill Davidson. "I would be afraid that they 
are not really duplicates, but you can't see the difference. That is 
museum artifact code you have there."


I don't know what that means, but it makes me afraid to delete the 
duplicate entries.  Can I do harm? Please explain.


Henry




take a look at each entry and make sure they're not duplicates.  If 
they're dups, then delete them.  If they're not dups, and each one is 
different, then don't delete them.  For example, you may log into 
hotmail.com, but the server may be live.2.com or live.3.com or 
something similar.


As for "museum artifact code" he's talking about the password manager 
it self.  The code is ancient and belongs in a museum.


If you want to see your passwords better, then I've attached 
something that works great.  Just save it to your hard drive, then 
use the Browser, and click on File, Open File, find the file, and 
open it from there.  It will give you a list of all your passwords.  
A lot better than the current password manager, imo though!


The program you attached works great.  Here are some entries (without 
passwords) that I have.  Can I delete all but one of each of them?


https://www.comcast.com  wa0...@arrl.net 
https://www.comcast.com wa0...@arrl.net
https://www.paypal.com 1https://www.paypal.com 
wa0...@arrl.nethttps://www.paypal.com 1
https://www.paypal.com 1https://www.paypal.com 1


This is where I don't know what's safe to delete.

Thanks for you program.

Henry



becareful, cause the password could be on another line.  For instance, 
on some sites, you will have a page just for your user name first, then 
on the next page will be your password.  So, in SM, that will be 2 entries.


If you want then do this: make a backup copy of the .s and key3.db 
files.  The .s is the password file, and the key3.db give you access to 
the file.  Once that is done, then visit those sites, and see what 
happens.  If nothing, then go ahead and delete them.  You won't cause a 
problem, cause you can always replace the password file.


As for the "program" that I attached: its not a program, but a piece of 
html javascript.


I found the key3.db file but what/where is the .s file please?  Thanks 
for hanging in there with me.


The Password Manager examples I gave before were the name of the site 
and the user ID as seen, all on a single line.  The passwords were on 
the same line but I just deleted the passwords.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: news.eternal-september

2010-10-25 Thread Henry

Walter wrote:




Walter wrote:


I know this is a mozilla support for seamonkey but...

I want to access some other support groups through
news.eternal-september.org and have joined the site. I cannot find how
to subscribe to any of the groups. Would somebody give me a hint where
to start.

Apologies for off topic query.

Walter.



OK. Thanks for the tips. I am set up now and have to decide which 
newsgroups I want to visit. First one will be comp.sys.cbm  Any other 
Commodore 64 fans here?


Walter.


I have the following Commodore 64 gear for sale.  If you know anyone that 
wants it, please let me know.


Commodore 64 computer
Commodore 1541C disk drive
Star SL-10C printer
Vic 20 model 1600 modem
Sharedata Utility Cartridge
Fortronics  Cardio Inc  DC/1 tape drive
No monitor - I used TV
Commodore to TV converter
manuals, many books, various programs and diskettes

I have no idea what this equipment is worth, but I'll never use it
again and so would like to get it to someone that can use it.

My phone number is  651-426-4144
e-mail is  wa0...@arrl.net

Henry   WA0GOZ

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Attachments allowed?

2011-01-05 Thread Henry
I am still running Mozilla 1.7.8 and would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey.  I 
have a number of profile problems that are keeping me from upgrading.


Are .jpg attachments allowed here?  I have a screen save that says what it 
would take many words to say, and then I'd probably get it wrong.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Upgrade from Mozilla to SeaMonkey question

2011-01-05 Thread Henry

I'm running a Dell 3GHz processor with 2G RAM with WinXP Pro SP3.

I'm still running Mozilla ver 1.7.8 and I would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey. 
 When I look at my Mozilla profile however, I am reluctant to upgrade and I 
would like advice from some knowledgeable people.  I have put two Images on 
http://profile.imageshack.us/user/wa0goz/ to try and show my concerns.  They 
are both of my profile.  Click on the images twice to enlarge for clarity.


1. Notice I have two .slt files.  Which one is correct and will having two 
give me problems when I upgrade?


2. My *present* ISP is *Comcast*.  If you look at the mail.comcast.net folder 
you will see that the files are empty.


3. My past ISP was tcq.net.  If you look at pop.tcq.net you will notice that 
the files have my email in them.  I don't know how this can be, because I 
haven't been with tcq.net for years.  I can't imagine them allowing my email 
to go through them.


My concern is what will happen if I try to upgrade and import my profile into 
the new SeaMonkey?


I hope along with the images I am making sense.

Thank you,

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade from Mozilla to SeaMonkey question

2011-01-06 Thread Henry

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


Henry wrote:


I'm running a Dell 3GHz processor with 2G RAM with WinXP Pro SP3.

I'm still running Mozilla ver 1.7.8 and I would like to upgrade to
SeaMonkey. When I look at my Mozilla profile however, I am reluctant to
upgrade and I would like advice from some knowledgeable people. I have
put two Images on http://profile.imageshack.us/user/wa0goz/ to try and
show my concerns. They are both of my profile. Click on the images twice
to enlarge for clarity.

1. Notice I have two .slt files. Which one is correct and will having
two give me problems when I upgrade?



If you drill down to the contents of the two folders, one will have 
files dated today and one will have only older files. That should tell 
you which is current.



2. My *present* ISP is *Comcast*. If you look at the mail.comcast.net
folder you will see that the files are empty.

3. My past ISP was tcq.net. If you look at pop.tcq.net you will notice
that the files have my email in them. I don't know how this can be,
because I haven't been with tcq.net for years. I can't imagine them
allowing my email to go through them.



Depending on how your filters are set up, messages can be in any folder, 
even the "wrong" account. Doesn't mean they went through tcq's mail 
server. For example, you may have moved a folder from one account to 
another (within the same profile), and if you did, SeaMonkey would have 
automatically updated any applicable filters to point to the new location.



My concern is what will happen if I try to upgrade and import my profile
into the new SeaMonkey?



If you have several accounts but only one profile, you should be fine. 
If it sees more than one profile, it will ask you to choose (by 
human-readable name, not the alphabet soup used to name the .slt file) 
and ignore the other one.


You didn't look at the profiles I posted.  My real ISP, Comcast, has email 
files dated 7/14/2007, while my old ISP, tcq.net, has email dated with files 
dated Dec. 2010 and Jan. 2011.


The one .slt folder has a cache folder with files dated Jan. 2011 while the 
.slt folder has files dated 2006 to 2011.


Will moving to SeaMonkey fix the errors that are in my profile and which 
profile will it pick up?


Henry

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade from Mozilla to SeaMonkey question

2011-01-06 Thread Henry

NoOp wrote:

Questions embedded


My _guess_ is that 2.0 will try to import the kt8 profile & all will
work. However...

Were I you I'd try to clean up the profiles first; (backup everything
first) remove hef7 if it's not being used, 


Do you mean just delete it?  It contains a lot of cache files with dates of 
Jan 4 - 6, 2011.  They must be there for some reason, and what happens when 
they get deleted?  Also, both the kt8 and hef are under the default profile, 
so if the new SeaMonkey asks for the default folder won't it take both.


and then correct your pop.tcq.net mail. 


How do I do that please?  I have no idea what you're talking about.


When you switched to comcast you most likely used an
installer & that created a folder for comcast mail (even if you never
used it). You then probably just changed your pop & smtp settings to
point to the comcast pop & smtp,


That last sentence is true. It seemed logical to me at the time.


so your mail et al would still have
remained in the pop.tcq.net folder. 


Why, if I changed my mail and smtp setting to comcast?


Sorry to be so dumb, but I would like my new upgrade to not have these flaws.

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Upgrade from Mozilla to SeaMonkey question

2011-01-12 Thread Henry



Paul B. Gallagher wrote:





Well, I can't reconcile these two statements about Comcast:
• you will see that the files are empty
• Comcast has email files dated 7/14/2007
Are you saying it has files from 2007 that are empty? I took your 
original statement to mean that the /folders/ were empty, didn't contain 
any emails. Now I'm confused.


The files from Comcast dated 7/14/2007 are empty.  Comcast is my present ISP.


Each .slt folder represents one profile. AFAIK it's up to you which one 
is used on import (the upgrade leaves your v.1 profile(s) intact, but 
imports a copy of one profile, conforming it to v.2 specs, and placing 
it in a separate folder -- this is called "migration").


But notice that *both* of the .slt folders are under Default, so when I 
upgrade both of the .slt folders will go with the Default import.  I only 
have one profile called Default.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: More video trouble at wat.tv

2011-03-04 Thread Henry

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Is this their issue or mine? (I'm guessing theirs, but I can't figure a 
way around it)


Can't start videos at
<http://www.wat.tv/video/the-road-home-40-2ye81_2ye4v_.html>
<http://www.wat.tv/video/the-road-home-40-2ye83_2ye4v_.html>

Disabled AdBblocker Plus, got the Bingo ad and all the other clutter, 
but the content won't start.


Accepting their cookies doesn't help, nor does clearing them.

Tried with SeaMonkey 2.0.12, also Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702.

When I tried IE 8, their system diagnosed an outdated Flash player -- it 
thinks I have version 6.0.88.0, but in fact I have version 10.2.152.32. 
Uninstalled and reinstalled Flash, no help. I've seen this before from 
wat.tv -- the webmaster obviously doesn't know how to test for this.


Thanks in advance for any help...
Merci d'avance pour aucune aide...

I have the same problem at http://www.marketwatch.comI could get their 
videos to play up until about three weeks ago and then they stopped playing 
and I can't figure out why.  If you find the solution, please post it.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Which Seamonkey?

2011-03-24 Thread Henry
I'm still using Mozilla 1.7.8.  Which version of Seamonkey would be the 
safest upgrade for me? I'm usually not good at upgrades and I don't want to 
loose my bookmarks and email addresses.


Thanks,

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Which Seamonkey?

2011-03-26 Thread Henry

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

Henry wrote:


I'm still using Mozilla 1.7.8.  Which version of Seamonkey would be the
safest upgrade for me? I'm usually not good at upgrades and I don't want
to loose my bookmarks and email addresses.

Thanks,

Henry




Henry

SeaMonkey 2.0.13 is the current official (and most stable) version.
This is the version you should install.

Go to this page:

http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0.13/

This page will provide information about the current Seamonkey release 
and instructions about how to upgrade from Mozilla. You will find the 
link to download SeaMonkey 2.0.13 from the column list on the left hand 
side of the page.


Please post here again if you need further help upgrading from Mozilla 
to SeaMonkey. One hint: before performing the upgrade, make sure you 
have a current back up of your Mozilla profile, just in case something 
goes wrong during the upgrade.


Since 2.0.13 is a new release, would I be better off waiting a while for any 
changes that might be made or upgrading to 2.0.12?


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey



Re: Browser unsupported ?

2011-04-03 Thread Henry

JD wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 4/2/11 10:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 4/1/11 12:41 PM, Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:


On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:


J. Weaver Jr. wrote:


Ray_Net wrote:


This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10



Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW



May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr



Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The<https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr> fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



To be sure, i put:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Firefox/3.6.16

AND it doesnot work !!!



Is that identifier what you see when you select [Help> About 
SeaMonkey]

from the menu bar?


Yes.



Hmmm. The Gecko version -- rv:1.9.1.15 -- and the Gecko date --
20101027 -- do not match Firefox 3.6.16. They should be rv:1.9.2.16 and
20101027, respectively.

I can think of two possibilities:

As I reported earlier, Google's server appears not only to be sniffing
the UA string but also parsing it. Perhaps, the mismatch between Gecko
and Firefox versions is causing problems.

Or perhaps the server is sniffing for a particular version of Gecko
rather than for the string "Firefox". It might want something like
1.9.2 instead of 1.9.1.

Either of these two would explain why my spoofing of Firefox 3.6.16
worked while yours did not work.


I cannot change my gecko version with about:config 
Anyway ... Google must accept SeaMonkey  but g...
they wrote somewhere a sentence like: "We do not discuss about other
browsers".



I use an add-on called PrefBar which allows me to spoof the User Agent.

http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/

And I was able to defeat Google profile's browser sniff.

Does just the new version of Seamonkey have problems with Google?  Should I 
install an earlier version?


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Password Manager

2012-10-29 Thread Henry
Does Password Manager no longer work please? I try it and only the heading 
comes up and it doesn't grab the User Name and Password.


Thanks

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Exporter

2012-10-29 Thread Henry
I should have said I'm trying to use it on Mozilla 1.7.8.  Ya I know, but I 
only use it to keep track of my bookmarks.


Henry

Zeb Carter wrote:

I had used it before but as I followed the various updates, it was 
reported as no longer compatible.


I seem to recall there was a way to force addons to install by editing 
one of the .rdf files within the .xpi package.


I believe it worked with 2.0x or 2.1. Has anything changed that would 
keep this addon from working - file structure wise, that is?


If someone could point me in the right direction, I would very much 
appreciate it.


Thanks!

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2012-10-29 Thread Henry
This is about a program that was called Password Manager and collected all of 
you User Names and Paswords and made a file out of them.


Henry


David E. Ross wrote:


On 10/29/12 5:39 PM, Henry wrote:

Does Password Manager no longer work please? I try it and only the heading 
comes up and it doesn't grab the User Name and Password.


Thanks

Henry




Is this about an existing password in Password Manager's database?  Or
is this about saving a new password?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Manager

2012-10-30 Thread Henry
I should have said I'm trying to use it on Mozilla 1.7.8.  Ya I know, but I 
only use it to keep track of my bookmarks.


Henry


David E. Ross wrote:

On 10/29/12 7:19 PM, Henry wrote:

This is about a program that was called Password Manager and collected all of 
you User Names and Paswords and made a file out of them.


Henry



Password Manager is a component inherent in SeaMonkey.  It's still there.

Either:

1.  Go to [Tools > Data Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu bar.  Enter your
master password if requested.  At the top-left where it might say "All
data types", left-click and select "Passwords only".

or

2.  Go to [Edit > Preferences] on the SeaMonkey menu bar.  On the left
side under Category, select [Privacy & Security > Passwords].  On the
Passwords pane, select the "Manage Stored Passwords" button, entering
your master password if requested.

Unfortunately, you can view the user IDs and passwords for only one
domain at a time.  For each domain (even for only one), you must again
enter your master password if you want to see the actual passwords and
not merely the user IDs.

If you want to view all domains at once, see bug #664574 at
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664574>, especially
comment #6.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Password Exporter

2012-10-30 Thread Henry

David E. Ross wrote:


On 10/29/12 6:05 PM, Zeb Carter wrote:

I had used it before but as I followed the various updates, it was 
reported as no longer compatible.


I seem to recall there was a way to force addons to install by editing 
one of the .rdf files within the .xpi package.


I believe it worked with 2.0x or 2.1. Has anything changed that would 
keep this addon from working - file structure wise, that is?


If someone could point me in the right direction, I would very much 
appreciate it.


Thanks!




I have Password Exporter 1.2.1 working with SeaMonkey 2.13.2.

I should have said I'm trying to use it on Mozilla 1.7.8.  Ya I know, but I 
only use it to keep track of my bookmarks.


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Embarrassed to ask

2013-04-05 Thread Henry

I'm running WinXP Pro SP3 with all updates.

I'm still running Mozilla ver 1.78  :-(

If I install the latest version of Seamonkey, will it pick up the profile 
from my obsolete Mozilla?


Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Embarrassed to ask

2013-04-05 Thread Henry

Iceman wrote:


On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:39:13 -0500, Henry wrote in message
<news:dpadnccx8npbf8lmnz2dnuvz_vwdn...@mozilla.org>:



I'm running WinXP Pro SP3 with all updates.

I'm still running Mozilla ver 1.78  :-(

If I install the latest version of Seamonkey, will it pick up the profile 
from my obsolete Mozilla?



No, not automatically. You must import the HTML file from Mozilla's profile
folder.


How do I do that please?  Are there instructions somewhere?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Embarrassed to ask

2013-04-06 Thread Henry

Daniel wrote:


Henry wrote:


I'm running WinXP Pro SP3 with all updates.

I'm still running Mozilla ver 1.78  :-(

If I install the latest version of Seamonkey, will it pick up the
profile from my obsolete Mozilla?

Henry


Henry, there was a change in file format in the move from SM 1.x to SM 
2.x. So, to be safe, you might have to install SM 1.1.19 (this should 
pick up your Mozilla profile), then install SM 2.0 and the 2.1 to make 
sure the file conversion occurs, and then you should be able to install 
SM 2.17 ( the latest version).


All these other versions are downloaded from the bottom of 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.17


Report back if you have any problems!!



>>Q<< wrote:

Current SeaMonkey can't use a Mozilla Suite profile, but on first run it
should notice the Mozilla profile and launch an import wizard.  See
<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey> for details.

This seems like an easier alternative.  Is it just as effective?

Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Problem send email from SeaMonkey 2 (test version)

2009-02-05 Thread henry . svonni
Hello

I have an problem witch i been aware of to day.

When i try to send email i´m only get an error messages say Could not
get password for "server" (its my SMTP server i have try different).

I´m using SeaMonkey
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:
1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081202 SeaMonkey/2.0a2

I have try every adjustment in the mail but nothing working
My primary SMTP server is gmail.com but i have try both yahoo and
lavabit but whit same error.
I have any problem to receive email from any of my accounts.
So i will be gald for help if anyone out there did now how to solve it

Thanks in advanced
Henry
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey