Hello,
on SM 2.13 (build 20120923005147 on OSX) I can't download all the
attachments in a received email at once.
Eg. an email with 10 photos attached, if I select them all and
drag-and-drop on the desktop, only the first one is copied!
The same problem goes if I want to drag them to iPhoto
Gabriel wrote:
Hello,
on SM 2.13 (build 20120923005147 on OSX) I can't download all the
attachments in a received email at once.
Eg. an email with 10 photos attached, if I select them all and
drag-and-drop on the desktop, only the first one is copied!
The same problem goes if I want to drag
freelance writer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
and verify that it is in
my sent basket.
On 12/6/2011 9:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is
completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it
hangs.
If I look in the send
Danny Kile wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person it is
sent to receives it. However
9:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person
it is
sent
.
On 12/6/2011 9:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person it is
sent to receives it. However, the copy complete box never
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person it is
sent to receives it. However, the copy complete box never
Ray_Net wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person it is
sent to receives it. However, the copy complete
After sending e-mails with attachments, the send process is completed.
Then the next steps to copy the mail to the sent folder then it hangs.
If I look in the send items folder the mail is sent and the person it is
sent to receives it. However, the copy complete box never closes. Any
help
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I have now tested sending an email with an attachment only, no text.
Same error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward emails
successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause the
problem.
FWIW, I've forwarded hundreds
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I have now tested sending an email with an attachment only, no
text. Same error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward
emails successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause
the problem.
FWIW, I've
as attachments from Tbird? Or do you
now have both set to forward inline? If both are crippled, that's not a
solution, it's a workaround.
The default for Tbird was to forward messages inline, which has always
worked, so I have never tested it to see if it works if I try to
forward messages
cqbrodie wrote:
Instead of forwarding an email with an embedded photo or whatever, I use the
REPLY
button, then change the RECIPIENT to the person(s) you now want to send stuff
to,
also delete the name of the person in the text that says Joe xxx wrote
and press the SEND button.
Before you
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip Taylor
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I can send an email with an
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip Taylor
But this
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with SeaMonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
More likely his own provider,
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip Taylor
Thanks for
one that was previously sent to me.
Incidentally the attachment was not executable. If it is relevant I am
using Linux Mint 10 KDE.
Can anyone help please?
Does it happen only when you forward a message with attachments on
its own, or does it happen when you forward simple text message,
also
OK, if I remember correctly there are various different
ways of forwarding messages : inline, as attachment, ...
Edit / Preferences / Mail Newsgroups / Composition
It might be worth checking that both Thunderbird *
Seamonkey are configured to forward in an identical way.
Philip Taylor
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:42:34 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
OK, if I remember correctly there are various different
ways of forwarding messages : inline, as attachment, ...
Edit / Preferences / Mail Newsgroups / Composition
It might be worth checking that both Thunderbird *
one that was previously sent to me.
Incidentally the attachment was not executable. If it is relevant I am
using Linux Mint 10 KDE.
Can anyone help please?
Does it happen only when you forward a message with attachments on its
own, or does it happen when you forward simple text message, also
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:42:34 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
OK, if I remember correctly there are various different
ways of forwarding messages : inline, as attachment, ...
Edit / Preferences / Mail Newsgroups / Composition
It might be worth checking that
error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward emails
successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause the problem.
Thanks
Neil
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo
Michael Gordon wrote:
Neil,
Check your anti-Virus configuration for scanning outgoing messages. Turn
off scanning outgoing messages.
BTW most Anti-Virus applications will flag and block .zip attachments.
Michael G
___
Well, well. Guess what? I
changed it to Forwarded Messages: 'Inline' and it now works as expected. I
did suspect that it would be something to do with the set up of SM. Now I can
forward emails with attachments without any error messages. Yay! But I do
still wonder why forwarding messages as an attachment should cause
touched this before so it must have been the default.)
I changed it to Forwarded Messages: 'Inline' and it now works as
expected. I did suspect that it would be something to do with the set
up of SM. Now I can forward emails with attachments without any error
messages. Yay! But I do still wonder
Messages was set up to 'As Attachment'. (I have never
touched this before so it must have been the default.)
I changed it to Forwarded Messages: 'Inline' and it now works as
expected. I did suspect that it would be something to do with the set
up of SM. Now I can forward emails with attachments without
Original Message
Subject: Re: Attachments
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:13:09 +0100
From: Neil Winchurst n...@pamneil.co.uk
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 21/08/11 17:00, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:50:29 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in paranoid mode.
Philip
an email with an attachment only, no text.
Same error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward emails
successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause the problem.
Thanks
Neil
Neil,
Check your anti-Virus configuration for scanning outgoing messages. Turn
off scanning outgoing
Instead of forwarding an email with an embedded photo or whatever, I use
the REPLY button, then change the RECIPIENT to the person(s) you now
want to send stuff to, also delete the name of the person in the text
that says Joe xxx wrote
and press the SEND button.
Rick Merrill wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with Seamonkey per se,
Neil. The error message you are seeing is almost certainly
generated by the distant end (i.e., the receiving mail server)
which is operating in
Neil Winchurst wrote:
I have now tested sending an email with an attachment only, no text.
Same error. As long as there is no attachment I can forward emails
successfully. It is obviously the attachments which cause the
problem.
FWIW, I've forwarded hundreds of messages over the years, both
wmv files do not play on ver. 2.2. Sometimes they open the windows
media program and do not play. Other times SeaMonkey just crashes.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 01/05/2011 07:58 PM, Michael Gordon wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2011 05:43 PM, Henry wrote:
I am still running Mozilla 1.7.8 and would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey. I
have a number of profile problems that are keeping me from upgrading.
Are .jpg attachments allowed here? I have a screen
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2011 07:58 PM, Michael Gordon wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2011 05:43 PM, Henry wrote:
I am still running Mozilla 1.7.8 and would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey. I
have a number of profile problems that are keeping me from upgrading.
Are .jpg attachments allowed here? I
On 01/05/2011 05:43 PM, Henry wrote:
I am still running Mozilla 1.7.8 and would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey. I
have a number of profile problems that are keeping me from upgrading.
Are .jpg attachments allowed here? I have a screen save that says what it
would take many words to say
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2011 05:43 PM, Henry wrote:
I am still running Mozilla 1.7.8 and would like to upgrade to SeaMonkey. I
have a number of profile problems that are keeping me from upgrading.
Are .jpg attachments allowed here? I have a screen save that says what it
would take many words
Klaus wrote:
When you look at the email source (Control-U), do both attachments have
the same MIME type?
It often happens to me that I receive emails (e.g. from the web interface
of GMX) that carry .DOC, .JPG, .PDF or other attachments but just use
Content-Type: application/octet-stream for any
Ray wrote:
I get Content-Type: multipart/mixed; whether SM gives me the option to
open the doc or only to save it.
I think this is refers to the complete e-mail. There are probably other
Content-Type: lines before each of the actual attachments.
Can you please check once more?
Klaus
Ray wrote:
I can't see a significant difference between these file names (both
contain spaces and a mix of letters numerals) and I can't understand
why SM treats them differently.
Hi Ray,
When you look at the email source (Control-U), do both attachments have
the same MIME type?
It often
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jim P wrote:
Jim P wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 08/29/2010 09:52 PM, Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail
Klaus wrote:
It often happens to me that I receive emails (e.g. from the web interface
of GMX) that carry .DOC, .JPG, .PDF or other attachments but just use
Content-Type: application/octet-stream for any attachment, regardless
of the actual file type.
Sorry, I meant web.de, not GMX.
Klaus
Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine as
long as there aren't any large attachments. Before last week
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine as
long as there aren't any large attachments. Before
Rick Merrill wrote:
Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine as
long as there aren't any large attachments. Before
On 08/29/2010 09:52 PM, Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine
as long as there aren't any large
NoOp wrote:
On 08/29/2010 09:52 PM, Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine
as long as there aren't any large
Jim P wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 08/29/2010 09:52 PM, Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine
as long as there aren't
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail works fine
as long as there aren't any large attachments. Before last week
Ever since I upgraded to 2.0, I have been getting double attachments.
Any clue on what I can do to fix this?
--
Pat Connors, Sacramento, CA
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
Is there a reason that when I receive an email with attachments, since I
updated to 2.0, I get two of each attachment?
--
Pat Connors, Sacramento, CA
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
Rick Merrill wrote:
Pat Connors wrote:
Is there a reason that when I receive an email with attachments, since I
updated to 2.0, I get two of each attachment?
Send a test to yourself - what happens?
Getting duplicate attachments seems to me to happen
when I or someone else forwards in both
it.
For example I received email attachments today from two people in my
contacts list. One was called Payroll summary - April 10.doc and SM
gave me the choice to open or save, and the other was called Membership
figures for July 2010 and the option to open it was missing and I was
offered only to save
it.
For example I received email attachments today from two people in my
contacts list. One was called Payroll summary - April 10.doc and SM
gave me the choice to open or save, and the other was called Membership
figures for July 2010 and the option to open it was missing and I was
offered only
Joe Zeff wrote:
Assuming that you've quoted the file names correctly, I can see one
reason why it might not have offered you that option: the second file has
no extension, and SM might be set not to offer an Open With option when
that happens. Personally, I'd think that this would be the best
Philip Chee wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:05:46 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote:
If you want to save yourself some grief, ditch Adobe Reader (horribly
bloated app) and get Foxit Reader:
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
According to unfavourable website reviews and user reactions the latest
version of
Paul wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
If you want to save yourself some grief, ditch Adobe Reader
(horribly bloated app) and get Foxit Reader:
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
According to unfavourable website reviews and user reactions the
latest version of Foxit Reader has
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
If you want to save yourself some grief, ditch Adobe Reader
(horribly bloated app) and get Foxit Reader:
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
According to unfavourable website reviews and user reactions the
latest
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
If you want to save yourself some grief, ditch Adobe Reader
(horribly bloated app) and get Foxit Reader:
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
According to unfavourable website reviews and user reactions the
latest
Le 7 juillet 2010, Lance Courtland a écrit :
When I click on a .pdf attachment in email, SM always asks Where do I want to
save it. SM used to just open it directly. All the options in
Edit/Preferences/Browser/Helper Applications show 'Use Adobe Acrobat (in
Seamonkey)' for application/pdf
patched. PDF has become a favorite target of maldoers.
and now I can open email pdf attachments.
..and you should most likely be saving them to your drive and scanning
them first before opening them. (Which renders your whole question moot,
doesn't it? g)
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:05:46 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote:
If you want to save yourself some grief, ditch Adobe Reader (horribly
bloated app) and get Foxit Reader:
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/
According to unfavourable website reviews and user reactions the latest
version of Foxit Reader has
Lance Courtland wrote:
When I click on a .pdf attachment in email, SM always asks Where do I
want to save it. SM used to just open it directly. All the options in
Edit/Preferences/Browser/Helper Applications show 'Use Adobe Acrobat (in
Seamonkey)' for application/pdf documents. If I do save
Phillip Jones wrote:
Lance Courtland wrote:
When I click on a .pdf attachment in email, SM always asks Where do I
want to save it. SM used to just open it directly. All the options in
Edit/Preferences/Browser/Helper Applications show 'Use Adobe Acrobat (in
Seamonkey)' for application/pdf
When I click on a .pdf attachment in email, SM always asks Where do I
want to save it. SM used to just open it directly. All the options in
Edit/Preferences/Browser/Helper Applications show 'Use Adobe Acrobat (in
Seamonkey)' for application/pdf documents. If I do save the pdf, it
opens fine
Hello all,
I use the SM2.1 nightlies
(http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/)
I see since a day or two a problem to open or save mail attachment.
I opened the bug here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572065
If anyone else see the same
dominique:
I use the SM2.1 nightlies
I also, but Linux.
(http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/)
I see since a day or two a problem to open or save mail attachment.
I opened the bug here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572065
I cannot
Hartmut Figge wrote, On 6/15/2010 2:30 PM:
dominique:
I use the SM2.1 nightlies
I also, but Linux.
(http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/)
I see since a day or two a problem to open or save mail attachment.
I opened the bug here
dominique:
Seems a duplicate / simlar to bug 572086
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572086
Mhm, that one is for TB and IMAP is not mentioned.
The problem sems related to IMAP, no POP... works fine in local folders.
Could be IMAP, yes. I cannot test that.
Hartmut
Ah, there is no New Type button in the helper app box here. Just Close and
Help.
If it's a Linux thing, perhaps someone who knows about such things could advise.
Thanks,
Ray
From: Paul p...@main.com
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Re webmail attachments
Message-ID: nl
attachments
Message-ID:nl-dnyulxsxz0ojrnz2dnuvz_qmdn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Ray Chandler wrote:
Incidentally, I couldn't see a way of adding to the helper apps list - how do
you do that?
Thanks, Ray
I am not at all familiar with Linux but I bet SM is much
attachments
Message-ID:nl-dnyulxsxz0ojrnz2dnuvz_qmdn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Ray Chandler wrote:
Incidentally, I couldn't see a way of adding to the helper apps list
- how do you do that?
Thanks, Ray
I am not at all familiar with Linux but I bet
To expand on Paul's response in Windows, download the file, then
rightclick it and select open with select the app and then check
always...
I've found that SeaMonkey does a good job of using the resultant windows
file associations and, when possible, it's a better option that using
helper
WLS wrote:
Subject: Re: webmail attachments
Message-ID: 0_odnqmlsextoivrnz2dnuvz_hqdn...@mozilla.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
First I checked my Helper Applications and there are none for office
extensions in the content type column! My Linux also only has buttons
Not sure if this is a Seamonkey problem or a quirk in BT-Yahoo webmail, but
when I receive emails with attachments I get inconsistent results.
If it is any kind of attachment other than a Word doc (or OO equiv), Seamonkey
gives me an option to either save the attachment or open it for viewing
Ray Chandler wrote:
Not sure if this is a Seamonkey problem or a quirk in BT-Yahoo webmail, but
when I receive emails with attachments I get inconsistent results.
If it is any kind of attachment other than a Word doc (or OO equiv), Seamonkey
gives me an option to either save the attachment
if this is a Seamonkey problem or a quirk in BT-Yahoo webmail,
but when I receive emails with attachments I get inconsistent results.
If it is any kind of attachment other than a Word doc (or OO equiv),
Seamonkey gives me an option to either save the attachment or open it
for viewing without saving. But if it's a Word
wrote:
Not sure if this is a Seamonkey problem or a quirk in BT-Yahoo webmail,
but when I receive emails with attachments I get inconsistent results.
If it is any kind of attachment other than a Word doc (or OO equiv),
Seamonkey gives me an option to either save the attachment or open
Ray Chandler wrote:
Sorry about the lack of info...
When you REPLY to an *existing* thread, hit **Reply**.
DO NOT start a new thread with each new post.
Ray Chandler wrote:
Sorry about the lack of info. I'm running SM 2.0.4 and the OS is Linux, Ubuntu
10.4
I
did look in the SM helper apps but didn't see an entry for .doc or .odt
files. But then there's no mention of pdf, ps or spreadsheet files
either, but they all download OK with the choice
W3BNR a écrit :
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
I've been wondering about delete and detach ever since I first
noticed them. The former is self-explanatory, but what's detach?
How about trying it out? :-P
Hartmut
Delete does exactly that. Detach allows you to pick a directory and
to systematically exclude attachments from saved copies, or
can this be done on an individual basis?
Thanks in advance.
I know of no way to do this while sending, but sounds like a good
feature request. However you can indeed delete or detach the
attachment(s) from individual messages. From within
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 7 juin 2010, NoOp a écrit :
I know of no way to do this while sending, but sounds like a good
feature request. However you can indeed delete or detach the
attachment(s) from individual messages.
Right, but the feature would also save time and bandwidth when Sent is
W3BNR wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
I've been wondering about delete and detach ever since I first
noticed them. The former is self-explanatory, but what's detach?
How about trying it out? :-P
Hartmut
Delete does exactly that. Detach allows you to pick a directory and
Paul B. Gallagher:
W3BNR wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
How about trying it out? :-P
Delete does exactly that. Detach allows you to pick a directory and
save the attachment as a file before deleting it from the sent msg.
Thanks, that's much more helpful.
I didn't know it but i tried it out
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
I didn't know it but i tried it out after your question. And i don't
understand, why you haven't tried it yourself.
In the absence of some appealing characteristic, I had no good reason
to.
You was curious enough to ask. ;)
Daniel Barclay:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
It's a matter of curiosity vs. laziness. I wondered about Detach since a
long time but was simply not curious enough to test. Until now. *g*
Accusing him of laziness is unfair.
That was an explanation why i hadn't done it myself for a long time.
Getting a
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
I didn't know it but i tried it out after your question. And i don't
understand, why you haven't tried it yourself.
In the absence of some appealing characteristic, I had no good reason
to.
You was curious enough to ask. ;)
I
Paul B. Gallagher:
Clicking first and asking questions later is the attitude that gets
people infected with malware and deletes essential files and so forth.
Right. But in a case, when you can work safe on copy ... ;)
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey
exclude attachments from saved copies, or
can this be done on an individual basis?
Thanks in advance.
I know of no way to do this while sending, but sounds like a good
feature request. However you can indeed delete or detach the
attachment(s) from individual messages. From within
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Daniel Barclay:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
It's a matter of curiosity vs. laziness. I wondered about Detach since a
long time but was simply not curious enough to test. Until now. *g*
Accusing him of laziness is unfair.
That was an explanation why i hadn't done it myself
Daniel Barclay:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Depends. In this case there is no danger.
And how does one know that a priori?
Sigh. Copying an E-Mail to a temporary folder and then working on this
copy should be known as safe to anybody who has used SM for a time.
All sorts of things have unexpected
On 06/09/2010 03:49 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
...
Getting a description (from documentation or from someone) is usually
a hell of a lot more efficient (and safe) than having to experiment
with a feature.
Depends. In this case there is no danger.
And how does one
Le 7 juin 2010, NoOp a écrit :
I know of no way to do this while sending, but sounds like a good
feature request. However you can indeed delete or detach the
attachment(s) from individual messages.
Right, but the feature would also save time and bandwidth when Sent is
remote (on an IMAP
Paul B. Gallagher:
I've been wondering about delete and detach ever since I first
noticed them. The former is self-explanatory, but what's detach?
How about trying it out? :-P
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher:
I've been wondering about delete and detach ever since I first
noticed them. The former is self-explanatory, but what's detach?
How about trying it out? :-P
Hartmut
Delete does exactly that. Detach allows you to pick a directory and
save the
201 - 300 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
