On 7/19/2009 4:48 AM PT, Philip Chee typed:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:47:31 -0700, Ant wrote:
I prefer not to use prerelease. Is it still buggy? Crashes, etc.? How
about the old extensions? I use all these:
* Extension Uninstaller API 2.0 (http://jgillick.nettripper.com/)
You don't need this
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:47:31 -0700, Ant wrote:
> I prefer not to use prerelease. Is it still buggy? Crashes, etc.? How
> about the old extensions? I use all these:
> * Extension Uninstaller API 2.0 (http://jgillick.nettripper.com/)
You don't need this. SeaMonkey comes with the Firefox 3.5 Addon
On 7/18/2009 4:00 PM PT, NoOp typed:
I hope we don't have to wait too long for SeaMonkey v2 since it is in
alpha now. :(
Why wait? SM 1.1.x and 2.0x run in parallel just fine. And from Kairo today:
I prefer not to use prerelease. Is it still buggy? Crashes, etc.? How
about the old extension
On 07/18/2009 03:38 PM, Ant wrote:
> On 7/18/2009 2:23 PM PT, NoOp typed:
>
>> http://prefbar.mozdev.org/
>> You can disable javascript with a single click before going to the site.
>> Works in 1.1.x and 2.0x
>> It's the first, and one of only a few, that I add as soon as installing
>> SeaMonkey o
On 7/18/2009 2:23 PM PT, NoOp typed:
http://prefbar.mozdev.org/
You can disable javascript with a single click before going to the site.
Works in 1.1.x and 2.0x
It's the first, and one of only a few, that I add as soon as installing
SeaMonkey or FireFox.
Yeah, I am using that. Usually, I am to
On 07/18/2009 01:01 PM, Ant wrote:
> On 7/18/2009 12:42 PM PT, Benoit Renard typed:
>
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ant wrote:
Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
>>>
On 7/18/2009 12:42 PM PT, Benoit Renard typed:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ant wrote:
Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
You could use the noscript extension. noscript.net
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ant wrote:
Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
You could use the noscript extension. noscript.net
Bad suggestion. NoScript disables JavaScript glob
On 7/17/2009 9:07 AM PT, Paul Hartman typed:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ant wrote:
Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
You could use the noscript extension. noscript.net
Thanks.
--
"I have to s
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ant wrote:
> Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
> Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
You could use the noscript extension. noscript.net
___
support-seamonkey maili
Since the problem still exists, is there a way to tell SeaMonkey v1 and
Firefox v2 to not use JavaScript/JS on these Web sites?
--
"I got this aunt... Carpenter ant." --Girl and Crow
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| |Ant's Quali
On 7/16/2009 1:53 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
> Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>> On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
>>> I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and
>>> hogging
>>> Web browser
On 7/16/2009 1:28 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
>>> On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
>> I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
>> Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
>>
>> Examp
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and
hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-gad
G. R. Woodring wrote:
Date: 7/16/2009 12:21 PM, Author: David E. Ross Wrote:
On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/
Date: 7/16/2009 12:21 PM, Author: David E. Ross Wrote:
On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-co
On 7/15/2009 9:59 PM, Ant wrote:
> On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-g
On 7/15/2009 8:38 AM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-gadgets
Is anyone else having this problem? If so, then
On 7/15/2009 7:52 AM PT, squaredancer typed:
On 15.07.2009 15:07, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM PT, squaredancer typed:
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lat
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-gadgets
Is
On 15.07.2009 17:38, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused David E. Ross
to generate the following:? :
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM, squaredancer wrote:
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering s
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM, squaredancer wrote:
> On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
> generate the following:? :
>> I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
>> Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
>>
>> Example:
>> http://gizmodo.com/5313690/w
On 15.07.2009 15:07, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM PT, squaredancer typed:
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM PT, squaredancer typed:
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-gadgets
Is anyone else having this problem? If so, the
On 7/15/2009 2:40 AM PT, squaredancer typed:
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-
On 15.07.2009 10:17, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Ant to
generate the following:? :
I noticed lately Gizmodo's Web pages are rendering slowly and hogging
Web browser's CPU and memory badly.
Example:
http://gizmodo.com/5313690/why-you-cant-complain-about-the-price-of-todays-gadgets
Is
27 matches
Mail list logo
