On 10/15/2009 10:43 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> A Williams wrote:
>> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
distribution list.
>>> Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
>>> I had inten
With patience akin to a cat's, Robert Kaiser, on 10/10/2009 9:41 AM typed:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/10/2009 9:41 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full news
Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009
A Williams wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
distribution list.
Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
I had intended :(
Robert Kaiser
Hmmm, could that not be considered a bug?
I
NoOp wrote:
On 10/13/2009 01:08 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Well, I found that the visible difference between my production profile
and the virgin test profile is that I had "allow cookies for the
originating website only" on the production system (the one that
failed). I conf
On 10/13/2009 01:08 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Bob Fleischer wrote:
>> Well, I found that the visible difference between my production profile
>> and the virgin test profile is that I had "allow cookies for the
>> originating website only" on the production system (the one that
>> failed). I confir
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Well, I found that the visible difference between my production profile
and the virgin test profile is that I had "allow cookies for the
originating website only" on the production system (the one that
failed). I confirmed that setting this on the virgin system caused that
si
Robert Kaiser wrote:
A Williams wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
distribution list.
Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
I had intended :(
Robert Kaiser
Hmmm, could that not
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Alex Beauroy wrote:
Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar???
Yes, but right now you need to use a nightly version of Lightning or
wait for their upcoming beta.
Robert Kaiser
Wonderful!!!
I'll have a good day then
Best Regards
@lex
___
Alex Beauroy wrote:
Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar???
Yes, but right now you need to use a nightly version of Lightning or
wait for their upcoming beta.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonke
A Williams wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
distribution list.
Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
I had intended :(
Robert Kaiser
Hmmm, could that not be considered a bug?
Jim S schrieb:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:06:20 +0200, Alex Beauroy wrote:
Hi there,
Is this the Seamonkey that will allow Lightning for calendar???
Best Regards
@lex
Not when I tried.
Very few add-ons fit.
Yes the Lightning nightly(!)-versions are working in SM2.0 since beta2
(including RC1).
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:06:20 +0200, Alex Beauroy wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
>> the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
>> discussing and reporting problems as well as
Robert Kaiser wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
>> distribution list.
>
> Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
> I had intended :(
>
> Robert Kaiser
Hmmm, could that not be considered a bug?
If you
Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 10/11/2009 6:19 PM chicagofan wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
What's the difference between this and the actual release?
Only a few last-minute bugs fixes, which are hopefully very small
and fix things that users report with the RC1.
Hopefully that will
On 10/11/2009 6:19 PM chicagofan wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
What's the difference between this and the actual release?
Only a few last-minute bugs fixes, which are hopefully very small
and fix things that users report with the RC1.
Hopefully that will include the Address
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
What's the difference between this and the actual release?
Only a few last-minute bugs fixes, which are hopefully very small and fix
things that users report with the RC1.
Robert Kaiser
Hopefully that will include the Address Book opening problem I s
Ken Rudolph wrote:
What's the difference between this and the actual release?
Only a few last-minute bugs fixes, which are hopefully very small and
fix things that users report with the RC1.
but I've been waiting for the
actual release, which I had heard was happening "in a week or so".
I
David E. Ross wrote:
Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
distribution list.
Yes, apparently I failed to change the second one to a "Followup-to" as
I had intended :(
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
supp
David E. Ross wrote:
On 10/10/2009 9:41 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full news
On 10/10/2009 04:08 PM, Neil wrote:
> Ken Rudolph wrote:
>
>> What's the difference between this and the actual release? Since I'm
>> not a techie, I chose not to be a beta tester; but I've been waiting
>> for the actual release, which I had heard was happening "in a week or
>> so". Apparentl
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:21:02 -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
>> Was there a glitch in mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey? Kaiser's original
>> message and every reply appears twice.
>
> Oh! mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey appeared twice in the Newsgroups
> distribution list.
SeaMonkey 2.0! Sugar and Spice and
On 10/10/2009 5:17 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 10/10/2009 9:41 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
>> SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
>> the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
>> discussing and reporting problems as well
On 10/10/2009 9:41 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
> the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
> discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
>
> Full news
Ken Rudolph wrote:
What's the difference between this and the actual release? Since I'm
not a techie, I chose not to be a beta tester; but I've been waiting
for the actual release, which I had heard was happening "in a week or
so". Apparently this still isn't the official release version?
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download
on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the
product.
What's the difference between this an
Robert Kaiser wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
What's the difference between this and the actual re
SeaMonkey 2.0 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download on
the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009-10-10
Downloads for
30 matches
Mail list logo
