When I go it says "This is an Internet Explorer web application." So, you've
lost me at the start. Why would you build an app in SVG that only works in IE?
IE is about as popular as syphilis these days.
Guy
On 19/08/2013, at 8:06 AM, "Francis Hemsher" wrote:
> ...I'm at it again;)
>
> I've
ure Safari will get
filters soon.
Guy
On 02/04/2011, at 10:43 AM, jamesd wrote:
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton wrote:
>>
>> And btw, your site looks fine in Safari...not much different to how it looks
>> in Chrome in fact.
>>
>
>
There's a difference. Hardly puts Safari in the same category as IE<9 though,
does it?
On 02/04/2011, at 10:43 AM, jamesd wrote:
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton wrote:
>>
>> And btw, your site looks fine in Safari...not much different to how
Perhaps he should qualify it as IE<9, since hardly anyone will have IE9 anytime
soon, sadly. All those XP users will be stuck on IE8 or worse for many years to
come.
On 02/04/2011, at 10:13 AM, Francis Hemsher wrote:
> Hi James,
> You'll be pleased to know your site works well in IE9.
> There
x on your front page?
There's an old saying "You catch more flies with honey than vinegar" that you
might like to ponder. I don't think telling people they are idiots is a great
way to get them to change...
Guy
On 02/04/2011, at 10:21 AM, Guy Morton wrote:
> Interesti
Interesting rant on your site. You do know that Safari is built from the same
codebase as Chrome, don't you? But one is a real browser and the other isn't?
Apple has been one of the main protagonists in the fight for better standards
support on the web. Their (I think brave) decision to not sup
Hi Andreas
I hadn't actually *tried* it, so your feedback is useful. I thought it would be
a bit smarter than that, and would translate sprite animations into the
equivalent DOM graphic + animation, but I guess timeline-based things like
tweening have no corollary in SVG.
I guess we shouldn't
HTML5 is a bit of a catch-all. In practice it is used to refer to "stuff
browsers other than IE can do", so I don't have a problem with SVG being
counted as a HTML5 feature.
Obviously, the limitations of canvas mean it's not a good way to implement
things like sprites that need to be modified
And of course you can also download Safari for windows.
On 20/02/2011, at 8:58 AM, Jeff Schiller wrote:
> Safari is powered by WebKit so you should be able to get some idea by
> looking at Chrome (though the WebKit powering Safari on iOS is different).
>
> Jeff
> On Feb 19, 2011 6:49 AM, "Raks A
If you enable the developer tools in Safari you can tell Safari to run in
iPhone or iPad mode. Very useful for debugging.
On 20/02/2011, at 1:49 AM, Raks A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a SVG SMIL animation but as I do not have any iOS device can
> someone help me in comparing the animation
Indeed and while IE usage worldwide is dropping rapidly, mostly in favour of
Chrome (for good reasons) it will still be many years before IE<9 drops to < 5%
of the market, which is the point at which most developers would cut it loose.
See http://gs.statcounter.com/
IE is currently about 46% of
Yes, I saw the same. They are just pulling from twitter though right? That's
the problem with crowd-sourced content... :-)
On 29/01/2011, at 9:50 AM, jamesd wrote:
> Time for some humor! I was bored and so… went to see the MS IE9 SVG demos. I
> selected the SVG tweet cloud demo. My mouse cursor
like another window opening up for the browser to fit in
>
> Regards
> Raks A
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Guy Morton wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Titanium embeds a webkit engine in your app.
>>
>>
>> On 13/01/2011, at 4:55 PM, Raks
Titanium embeds a webkit engine in your app.
On 13/01/2011, at 4:55 PM, Raks A wrote:
> Could not find anything related to SVG in Titanium, are you sure that
> Titanium has built in SVG player than can play SVG SMIL animation ?
>
> - Raks A
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Ja
Look at the Titanium framework.
http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-mobile-application-development/
On 13/01/2011, at 3:24 PM, Raks A wrote:
> I know SVG is supported in iPhone Safari browser, but are there APIs to play
> SVG SMIL animation using iPhone APIs
>
> I've never written i
There's a JS called Easel you might like to look at. I had exactly the same
questions. It looks to me like Easel is trying to make Canvas have the same
capabilities as SVG. Why? I think, as you suggest, any browser that has Canvas
support also has some level of SVG support. Why try to give Canva
I think Adobe are strategising themselves out of the game. They are fiddling
while Rome burns.
If you haven't already, look at Titanium...write once, deploy EVERYWHERE using
WebKit as your runtime engine.
And by "everywhere" I mean Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android AND you can deploy
your cod
For out of browser apps built with open web technologies look at Titanium.
http://www.appcelerator.com/
Both AIR and Titanium use WebKit to render your content, but Titanium doesn't
strip out competing technologies, because the developers don't OWN any
competing technologies.
Titanium is free
I agree with Robert...I think your statements are a little intemperate, and I
love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next man.
In reality, Firefox had SVG support before Safari and Chrome. All 4
browsers-other-than-IE have decent SVG support now, and it's still improving
with each release
Loaded as quickly in FF3.6 on mac as it did in safari on mac...
Since Chrome and Safari use the same engine I'm surprised you're seeing a
difference between safari and chrome in terms of performance.
Guy
On 05/11/2010, at 6:58 AM, scalablev wrote:
> Try http://kart.nois.no/pub/oye/ie9/mapfile
How ironic. A talk about SVG on Canvas that requires Silverlightoh Patrick,
you're a wag!
Are you sure this isn't just a ploy to get more Silverlight downloads?
On 30/10/2010, at 5:33 AM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:20 PM, patrickdengler
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
You didn't look very hard. Try scrolling to the middle of the page...
On 03/01/2009, at 9:58 AM, Fuliopen wrote:
> I went to the following web page:
>
> http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/
>
> It seems that ASV is no longer available for download. But if one
> has already installed ASV to
Sounds like a great project, Brad.
If you feel up to a challenge, look at http://lhr.webtrak-lochard.com/
HNY to you too.
Guy
On 29/12/2008, at 8:39 AM, Brad Neuberg wrote:
> Hi Stelton I'm working on this here at Google as part of a group
> focused on Open Web Advocacy. I'm using Flash to do
By the way, it might interest all to know that based on recent stats
for our web app, IE (all versions) has only 55% of the browser market
these days. A few years back it had 85%. I quote this because many
people, it seems to me, are stuck on the idea that IE hold an
unassailable position a
Tell them to stop using that piece of junk browser and start using
something more secure and standards compliant, eg Firefox, Safari,
Opera. Any of those is better than IE - by a long shot, and all render
SVG (though supported features may vary from one to another).
Guy
On 31/12/2008, at 1
Just curious...but why are you doing that?
On 09/12/2008, at 3:13 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
> I use Inkscape a lot. I've been converting some of my jpg files into
> svg files (opening the jpg file and save as a svg), but with over 1000
> files to convert, it is going to take me quite some time.
>
> W
Where are people getting the ideas that either MS is serious about
adding native SVG support to IE, or that there is any chance at all
that Adobe would sell them ASV?
I mean, it's a nice daydream of course, but this is MS we're talking
about here...
Guy
On 12/11/2008, at 10:43 PM, Francis
++
On 11/10/2008, at 2:21 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
> Hi, David-
>
> Brilliantly, hilariously written. You should repost this in a blog
> for
> wider exposure and posterity.
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
> ddailey wrote (on 10/10/08 9:54 PM):
>> I noticed tonight that the number of hits returned by G
Nice work.
On 20/09/2008, at 10:49 PM, meikelneu wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> good to hear, Guy.
>>
>> Yes, I think that mobile apps need to be different from desktop apps.
>> Not only are the displays smaller, but the touch screen events are
>> probably not very precise, compared to
at
> least selected SVG 1.2 features that are useful in the HTML5 context.
>
> This is something that Microsoft increasingly cannot simply ignore.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You should wor
You should work on the basis that IE will NEVER natively support SVG.
MS are playing a clever game of brinkmanship here, knowing that while
they keep "native SVG support in IE" as a possibility, it will cripple
efforts to build an alternative as developers will think "why start
that when IE
I always recommend people use something other than IE. It's the work
of the devil. :-)
Safari, Opera & Firefox all have some level of SVG support and are
available on Mac and Windows.
On 30/08/2008, at 2:49 AM, Samuel Dagan wrote:
> Hi Fulio,
> It is not known if and when ASV will be not any
That's an IE 'feature'. In case you haven't noticed yet, IE is a
piece of crap.
You can use javascript to scroll to a named anchor, though. Do a
google. scrollTo I think is one of the js functions you are looking
for. Also, browserEval is your friend.
Guy
On 22/10/2007, at 1:23 PM, tushar
We ended up dynamically writing either object or embed, based on a
browser sniff. I think that's the safest approach.
Guy
On 08/09/2007, at 2:36 AM, brucerindahl wrote:
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Armin Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>> we had the same prob
move on.
Guy
On 12/06/2007, at 4:57 PM, pilatfr wrote:
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I think you've put plenty of words in.
>>
>> Saying something can work on 90% of browsers right now when what
>
it loads served files ok in my experience, eg http://lhr.webtrak-
lochard.com/svg, but it doesn't run our application, sadly. I'm not
sure what they are missing, but it works on our stuff about as well
as webkit (which is not really a surprise).
Would be great if it worked, especially if it w
I think you've put plenty of words in.
Saying something can work on 90% of browsers right now when what you
really mean is "if they install the plugin" is disingenuous at best
and downright dishonest at worst. At least SVG has real native
support in the most popular IE alternatives out there
Yes, Claus, I'd actually seen this once before. What is the status
with it? Perhaps this is a project the SVG community ought to be
trying to help push forward?
Guy
On 29/05/2007, at 8:30 AM, Claus Wahlers wrote:
>
>> If Adobe were smart, they'd build SVG support into the flash plugin
>> (as
http://blogs.theage.com.au/thedailytruth/archives/2006/11/get.html
I don't think anyone's saying SVG has no challenges ahead. I think a
lot of people who are interested in using SVG *want* to support the
open standards of the w3c rather than have yet another promising
standard bastardised an
So why are you still here?
On 26/05/2007, at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Swenson wrote:
> SVG is probably a dead duck. I have not wanted to invest any more
> work in it
> for more than a year. This is not to say that I dislike SVG much at
> all, but
> the Adobe plugin has a lot of problems, and SVG is
Right on Doug!
It's especially irritating when people post nothing of substance
except "ra-ra-ra"s for their preferred SVG alternative.
If SVG isn't what you're interested in, unsubscribe!
Guy
On 26/05/2007, at 11:14 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
> Hi, Kevin and Geoff, et al-
>
> As owner of the
; --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> We have found on anything but the smallest XML nodes that
>> getElementsByTagName sometimes fails to find nodes that our
>> replacement function finds 100% reliably. YMMV, but that's
large array when one exists already. The way it is now it should
> never work very well.
>
>> 99% fine.
>
> What happens to the remaining 1%? (just kidding).
>
> Domenico
>
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
getElementsByTagName is unreliable in IE/ASV. You haven't given a lot
of details but I suspect this is your problem. we had similar
problems and wrote a replacement function and the problem went away.
Guy
On 25/04/2007, at 9:26 PM, krugerboy1971 wrote:
> I am trying to load some external GM
Aha...well that's the problem for me. I resized the window and it
appeared. Good to know you know what is causing it.
And I'll add my "Wow" to Andre's...FF used to use 70% of my CPU
playing this file. Now it's using about 7%. There are some screen
redrawing issues though still, which you'll
I wish I could report the same happy news. Unfortunately,
GranParadiso (on MacOSX at least) fails to render *anything* for me.
It even seems buggy in doing normalish browser things like resizing
framesets (the toolbar has half disappeared under the window title in
my testing).
Have a look
I don't know. Ask Adobe perhaps. I can't think of a logical reason
for Adobe to ban third parties distributing ASV if Adobe themselves
is going to continue to make it available for download from their web
site.
Guy
On 13/02/2007, at 8:30 PM, Dylan Browne wrote:
>
>> ASV 3 will be *availabl
#x27;re right, and I confirmed it on their EOL FAQ
>
> http://www.adobe.com/svg/pdfs/ASV_EOL_FAQ.pdf
>
> The lack of certification on Vista is interesting. Has anyone tried
> running
> SVG apps in IEx on Vista?
>
> Ronan
>
> On Monday 12 February 2007 22:37, Guy Mo
ASV 3 will be *available* indefinitely. It won't be *supported* after
Jan 2008.
On 13/02/2007, at 5:57 AM, Ronan Oger wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007 18:42, nphasematt wrote:
>> I upgraded my ASV to the beta 6 version, a
>
> Matt,
>
> ASV is a retiring product, and ASV6 will never be upgra
Good to see progress being made, though this version of the plugin
still doesn't run my app... looks like scripting may still be not
quite there?
Anyone else tried it out?
Guy
On 06/02/2007, at 1:52 AM, emiasys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a short notice that Renesis SVG Player 0.5 has been la
You are using getTarget() and getOwnerDocument(). These are ASV-
specific I believe and should be replaced with their standard
equivalents.
On 15/01/2007, at 6:40 AM, Marjorie Roswell wrote:
> What goes around comes around. SVG now works beautifully at work
> (the goal
> from this 2-year-ago
In my experience, getElementsByTagName() is notoriously unreliable
and will give different answers at different times for no apparent
reason. Write a function to replace it and use that instead.
Guy
On 14/12/2006, at 3:32 AM, vinay wrote:
> I have a problem with ajax
>
> Actually i do not kn
Hi all
We're seeing some problems with the latest version of Opera on
Windows XP. Sometimes our application fully loads and starts up,
sometimes it doesn't, but just hangs at the init stage. When it does
run, it uses 99% of CPU pretty consistently.
On the Mac version of opera running under
Bravo! :-)
On 13/12/2006, at 7:26 AM, Marjorie Roswell wrote:
> A Vaguely Seasonal Musical Greeting (AVMG)
> To the tune of Old McDonald... an homage to our acronyms:
>
> Old McDonald raised his arm
> And pointed towards the sky
> In SVG with ASV, he peered both far and high
> With an Opera he
I'd have used Flash for the sort of thing you were describing
anyway. :-)
SVG doesn't have the installed base you'd want for a web site splash
screen. Flash does, and excels at pretty animated graphics (not that
it's only good for that, you can also build pretty cool apps in Flash).
Guy
O
Splash screens for web sites are so 90s anyway, you're better off
without them altogether. :-)
Guy
-
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my
membership"
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your grou
e'd have a
pretty good solution for browsers that require an SVG plugin.
Anyway, the above may be completely impractical or technically
impossible. I just thought I'd share it in case it's not. :-)
Guy
On 06/12/2006, at 10:09 AM, John Dowdell wrote:
> Guy Morton wrote:
>
Hi Doc
I've been programming for the Internet since 1994 as well - long
enough to have seen how these things go, and I don't think Adobe are
giving ANY indication that they plan to roll SVG support into the
Flash plugin. John Dowdell himself hinted that this was probably not
going to be an
How hard would it be to package this as an "SVG plugin"? ie package
it in a windows installer a user could download and run and which
would install itself and behave as the ASV plugin does today?
Guy
On 07/12/2006, at 3:53 AM, T Rowley wrote:
> On 12/6/06 10:36 AM, Jeff Schiller wrote:
>> I
7;s a tantalising prospect, but I can't see it
happening in our lifetimes. Why would Adobe not have announced that
intention before now, if that was their plan? Why would they do it?
Guy
>
> Tony
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED
DOM. So by
> extension I am a fan of this WPF/E stuff too. Same model. It has
> nothing to do with blinders or gullibility or that Bill Gates
> invented the Web, Cellular Telephone, and Transistor or whatever else
> he invented.
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
> --- In svg-de
Nup, I'm not the least bit interested in that. Another proprietary
model for delivering "rich web apps"? no thanks.
I can't believe *anyone*, except die-hard and blinkered M$ fans, can
want this.
Sounds like they ought to be able to support SVG using this stuff
though, and pretty easily I'd
gdoc.getElementById("compValue") != null)
> {
> var morex = svgdoc.getElementById("compValue").getAttributeNS
> (null,"x");
> morex = parseInt(morex) - 40;
> svgdoc.getElementById("compValue").setAttributeNS
> (null,"x&
I've not heard of any progress on this, other than I think they are
taking a serious look into why it's happening (at least I hope they
are). Another example for them to chew over can only help. There is
no workaround as far as i know, which leaves us currently unable to
consider FF2 a usab
On 17/11/2006, at 7:11 PM, steltenpower wrote:
> -Adobe thinks it needs the open format SVG is, to be able to stand
> Microsoft competition. As more and more people understand the
> advantage of a real open format, but too many people think SVG is an
> Adobe(-only) format, Adobe is taking a lowe
Whether they do or not will depend entirely on what they think will
maximize their profits. Right now I suspect they probably think
supporting SVG natively won't do much one way or the other for their
bottom line so I, personally, will be surprised if they exert
themselves unduly to support
ayNick/RTG/RTGraph1.svg
>>
>> The does not have any child text, but is filled
>> in by script. If I add child text such as a '-', then it works fine.
>> http://www.wpsenergy.com/JayNick/RTG/RTGraph.svg
>>
>> Jay Nick
>>
>> --- In svg-develo
that, or even find a workaround. Even if you don't find a
> solution, it will be far easier for others to try to help you.
>
> My intuition is that you are running into a problem with
> elements.
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
> Guy Morton wrote:
>> Tim? Did you ha
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, T Rowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/8/06 6:11 PM, Guy Morton wrote:
>>> It seems in FF2 on Windows that all my text elements that use text-
>>> anchor="middle" are now positioned incorrectly.
>
Tim? Did you have any luck with this FF2 bug?
Guy
On 09/11/2006, at 11:35 AM, T Rowley wrote:
> On 11/8/06 6:11 PM, Guy Morton wrote:
>> It seems in FF2 on Windows that all my text elements that use text-
>> anchor="middle" are now positioned incorrectly.
>>
ecko-based browsers as well?
In the meantime, you can test this bug by going to http://lhr.webtrak-
lochard.com/svg. That URL will load the SVG directly (it won't work
in IE/ASV though).
regards
Guy
On 10/11/2006, at 12:55 AM, Martin Honnen wrote:
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com,
Who has a recommendation for a source of map data? Prefer a hosted
solution rather than setting up our own map server (eg
www.arcwebservices.com). Would like access to satellite/aerial
imagery if possible. What services have people used? What's hot?
What's not?
Guy
-
To unsubscribe s
till being aligned correctly, but some
(like the tooltips) are not.
Guy
On 09/11/2006, at 11:35 AM, T Rowley wrote:
> On 11/8/06 6:11 PM, Guy Morton wrote:
>> It seems in FF2 on Windows that all my text elements that use text-
>> anchor="middle" are now positioned in
It seems in FF2 on Windows that all my text elements that use text-
anchor="middle" are now positioned incorrectly.
FF2 on Mac doesn't show the problem (though it has other text bugs)
Anyone know anything about this? Anyone at Mozilla working on it? It
is a MAJOR pain. In fact, FF2 on windows
It's not forbidden, it's just that most of us have at best a
smattering of high-school French, so if you want answers you *may*
have to lower yourself to our level. ;-)
OR
On ne l'interdit pas, il est seulement que la plupart d'entre nous a
au mieux un notion du Français de lycée, ainsi si
Yes, good on you for listening. Now if you could just finish the beta
version (v6) of the plugin - I live that little critter!
Guy
On 11/10/2006, at 5:04 PM, Antoine Quint wrote:
> On 11 oct. 2006, at 01:47, Paton J. Lewis wrote:
>
>> In response to customer feedback, Adobe has extended custom
document.getElementById('sometext').firstChild.nodeValue - you can
get and set it using this syntax
Guy
On 29/09/2006, at 8:18 PM, gnylarichard wrote:
> I can get attribute values from the following, but how do i get the
> value of the text Richard?
>
> font-family="Arial" font-size="5.6"
>
Yeah, but it's not too professional-looking to have to give a list of
"abandoned" websites that happen to host the plugin and hope that joe
public will trust that any software thus downloaded isn't riddled
with virii and worms. who's going to guarantee that it isn't? You?
I love civil disobe
Yes, not much use if you want joe public to go and install it though.
P2P is hardly a trusted source in most people's books. The same
appies to everyone adopting a stance of civil disobedience and
hosting it on their own sites.
Adobe ought to host it for a year or two more than they've
ann
N...don't go over to the dark side Luke!!
Web solutions should be based on STANDARDS, people!
Guy
On 13/09/2006, at 3:45 AM, kggsystem wrote:
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Tell me about it, a complete nightmare.
>>
>> Our apps solely work on SVG w
crosoft followed Adobe's lead and
> announced VML end-of-life in the same (unacceptable) manner as Adobe.
> Microsoft is considerably more sensitive to supporting their existing
> community of developers. When VML is EOL'd, Microsoft will give
> something
> like a 5-y
Yes, it gives the lie to the lip service they give to standards
adherence. M$ in particular only support those standards that they
feel benefit their business (like someone else said, there's no other
reason for them to release software for free).
Honestly, how hard would it have been from M
Anyone had any experience of converting SVG to flex?
Clearly Adobe is hoping that's what will happen.
Guy
On 07/09/2006, at 3:00 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:
> Hi, folks-
>
> There is a FAQ associated with this announcement, but of course,
> it's in
> Web-unfriendly PDF. I'm forwarding on the t
hear hear. i'm an opera convert. SVG is a little slower at times but
it doesn't use as much CPU as FF and it's more solid and has the best
standards support of any browser, imho. I can also personally vouch
for the responsiveness of the Opera team.
if everyone used opera, my life would be *s
how are you embedding your SVG? in an embed tag? do you have a
content-type attribute in there?
is there a difference between the IE versions?
are you compressing the SVG file with gzip?
Guy
On 16/08/2006, at 2:42 AM, Sean wrote:
> I had put this off to the side thinking it might have been
sn't silently failing to work, with the
end user believing they are SVG capable while actually seeing your
content displayed in the ASV2.0 plugin?
Guy
On 03/08/2006, at 2:08 PM, Phi Tran wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Guy Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jo
8/2006, at 2:18 AM, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
> Guy,
>
> are you sure the links aren't local?
> eg the adobe one clearly isn't
>
> cheers
>
> Jonathan Chetwynd
>
>
>
> On 2 Aug 2006, at 07:51, Guy Morton wrote:
>
> I'm hoping someone more
I'm hoping someone more experienced than I can chuck us a clue on
this one.
We have a user of our app that claims that they can see the little
Adobe-provided "Spinning balls" SVG movie but that when they go to
load our app all they see is a message in plain text saying "Data not
available"
Some good SVG improvements in FFb2, especially for Mac users of SVG!
They seem to have fixed the colour and bitmap bug that made bitmaps
go screwy and *most* of my text is now visible, though for some
reason it's all italicised. Some is still missing or invisible - can
anyone from the Firef
Hey Ganesh
Forwarding chain email hoaxes onto ANYONE is bad, but forwarding them
onto a MAILING LIST is especially bad form and likely to get you
removed from the mailing list in question. Well it would in my
perfect world anyway.
The Red Cross WILL NOT BE DONATING 10c to ANYONE just becaus
Has anyone written up a page comparing the strengths, weaknesses and
performance pitfalls for each of the SVG implementations? That would
be a handy reference.
Guy
On 18/07/2006, at 11:13 PM, ddailey wrote:
>
> From: "Guy Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> ...
Also, consider firing your function via an onload event - that way it
shouldn't be called until the SVG is loaded
On 18/07/2006, at 11:36 PM, Martin Honnen wrote:
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "jack2wsx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> > frameborder=0 width=100% height=100% src='R
Well yes, it uses 100% CPU on XP2 but also under Mac OS X.
The app is pretty busy and does a lot of stuff, and it loops through
a bunch of code once per second.
Curiously, if viewed on its own in Firefox it uses slightly less CPU
than if it's embedded in a html wrapper.
Our app animates vect
Hi all
Someone must have encountered this before (I hope so anyway).
I'm trying to pass parameters to an SVG app. I can do this using URLs
(eg /my.svg?param1=1¶m2=2) and this works fine, until you hit the
IE 5.5 bug talked about as bug 3a on this page: http://
www.swiftview.com/tech/tests/ie
I've just got myself a macbook pro running mac os x 10.7, and i
downloaded firefox (the current version) and SVG is terrible in it.
the bitmaps are all in a weird colour space and the text is outlined
weirdly and so on. Is this just a problem with FF on a mac?
Guy
and you can use the element around other elements to make it happen
in ASV. ugly, but it works.
Guy
Andreas Neumann wrote:
> yes, just use the cursor attribute.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/interact.html#Cursors
>
> Cursors aren't implemented in Adobe SVG viewer version 3 but in all other
>
This seems to indicate that they are hosting your DNS and using their
control of that to prevent you from changing hosts - this is not legal
as far as I am aware - your domain name belongs to you, not them, and
you are entitled to change your DNS records as you see fit. This is all
you need to
; you would
> use suspendRedraw(), Opera would be much quicker.
>
> Andreas
>
> PS: but yes, I also saw that the rendering speed is slower when dragging
> bigger elements
> on top of other elements. Thats a fact in the current version. It seems like
> the newest Bati
Has anyone got any feedback or comments regarding the speed of Opera's
engine? I've noted that it appears to slow down proportionally to the
amount of screen it needs to redraw. It seems quite a bit slower than FF
and a lot slower than ASV. Where is the bottleneck? Can we do anything
to optimis
why not use embed? it seems to work fine in firefox and IE/ASV. I set it
to use 99.9% for width and height and haven't seen any issues.
Guy
Lance Dyas wrote:
> krugerboy1971 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> This seems to work nicely across all implementations - the only
>> problem is that in Firefox and
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
