[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - survey_point:hexagonal_bolt

Hi, I've been surveying benchmarks for the past four months and I would like to propose an addition to my earlier proposal for survey_point:benchmark: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/survey_point:hexagonal_bolt Definition: Ordnance survey point replacing rendered over or

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - survey_point:benchmark

Hi, I've been surveying benchmarks for the past four months and I would like to propose an alternative to benchmark=yes for survey points: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/survey_point:benchmark The reason being that I would like to also propose survey_point:hexagonal_bolt

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - barrier:guard_stone

Hi everyone, mostly for European use (I think), I propose a new node type barrier, namely "guard stone": A guard stone is in most cases a stone built onto or into the corner of a building or wall. They are usually found on either side of an entrance to a laneway or gateway. Guard

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - guard stone

Hi, there haven't been any comments on it in a while, so I think it is safe to start the voting process on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/guard_stone Voting ends on January 4th. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussion and proposal page! Happy holidays,

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - lifecycle prefix vandalised:

uthorities would use those desctructive methods. I don't know how to make it clearer to you. You may use survey:date instead, if you like. I've expanded the explanation on the wiki. Anne On 17/09/2023 13:08, Marc_marc wrote: Le 17.09.23 à 12:50, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit : I'm proposing to est

[Tagging] oops, sorry

The colon after the "Vandalised" made the link not work on mastodon and maybe here as well, so I've deleted it from the Proposal name. Sorry about the confusion. Anne ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - lifecycle prefix vandalised:

I'm proposing to establish the lifecycle prefix "vandalised:" which has been in use for at least 8 years in some form, but hasn't been documented. This was triggered by noticing this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11196545305 (unfortunately, I didn't take a photo).

[Tagging] cancelling proposal

Hello all, I've decided to cancel the proposal I started on August 22 in favour of using the vending machine option in combination with fee=no instead. Thanks everyone for participating in the discussion. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Free_period_products Anne

Re: [Tagging] Re: [RFC] Feature Proposal - free period products

Fair points. Transgender people are also one of the reasons why I didn't want to use the terminology "feminine hygiene".AnneOn 23/08/2023, 08:31 Amanda McCann wrote: On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:53 +02:00, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: > I've created a proposal to map whethe

[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - free period products

Hello all, I've created a proposal to map whether free period products are available in a toilet which seems to become more common in recent years. It think it's as valid as adding changing tables. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Free_period_products Kind regards, Anne

Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs

: Do you have a feeling how many "archeologic" sites in OSM are in reality palaeontological? I fear this is a frequent error, but difficult to spot. On Sun, 16 Oct 2022, 17:33 Anne-Karoline Distel, wrote: Hello all, I'm doing a huge tidy-up amongst the values for

Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs

I'm just saying it would be nice if the editors (iD, JOSM) would give a warning if someone tries to put dinosaurs within the range of human habitation. On 16/10/2022 18:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 16 Oct 2022, at 18:05, Volker Schmidt wrote: Do you have a feeling

[Tagging] dinosaurs

Hello all, I'm doing a huge tidy-up amongst the values for "site_type", documented in a diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/400151 I've come across a few dinosaur footprints, but that is not archaeology, because archaeology is about man made structures. Is there a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

org. But I must presume the critics have thought of all that before they voted. Anne On 22/10/2022 13:34, Andy Townsend wrote: On 22/10/2022 11:44, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the concern about the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

What is the use of the proposal process then? Anne On 22/10/2022 14:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 22 Oct 2022, at 12:47, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the concern about the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - archaeological_site

Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the concern about the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose to change the key from site_type to archaeological_type for reasons laid out under "Rationale": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:archaeological_site

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - crannog

Hello all, the proposal for crannog has been rejected with 6 yes votes, 5 no votes and 2 abstain votes. Thank you all for your input. This will be followed up shortly with a new proposal. Anne ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

Not in reply to this specific email, but I've done a bit of tidying amonst keys and values the last three days, and I've documented some of my findings which might give food for thought: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/400164 (I hope you like footnotes...:-) ) Anne On

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

in Ireland. I think there is an annual archaeological summer school at the one on Achill Island anyway (https://achill-fieldschool.com/). Anne On 17/10/2022 20:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 17 Oct 2022, at 20:30, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Not in reply to thi

Re: [Tagging] Literal translation of street names

I agree that it is interesting to know what the street name means, but there is no ground truth for it.Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 19/09/2022, 11:42 "Janko Mihelić" wrote: A user in my city (Zagreb) started translating street

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

I was sceptical at first, but after looking at the example, I understand the necessity for hikers. However, I'm not entirely convinced it classifies as a "highway", because there doesn't seem to be a clear way visible; you just try to get from A to B as best you can.--Sent from my Android

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - site_type=defensive_settlement

Hello everyone, I'm proposing to introduce a new sub class of (archaeological) site types "defensive settlement": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:site_type%3Ddefensive_settlement My reasoning will hopefully be clear from the proposal page. Feel free to point out

[Tagging] RFC - defensive_settlement

Hello all, I wish to withdraw my proposal, because I have come to the conclusion that I'm over-categorizing and that settlement will have to do with further settlement_types down the hierarchy which are partly already in use. I will add the "archived" template which is usually only done after

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

sent from a phone On 22 Sep 2022, at 18:06, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Following that swiftly with a new proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog at first I thought that’s quite a specific value for such an apparently generic term like settlement type,

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - settlement_type=crannog

Following that swiftly with a new proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog I still have 23 crannogs mapped as defensive_settlement=crannog; I don't know if I should wait until after the vote to change them. I've only changed the two Scottish ones referred to in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - site_type=defensive_settlement

There are apps for that. ;-) For trees, I mean. But thanks for adding them anyway. Anne On 20/09/2022 20:03, martianfreeloader wrote: I agree. We have loads of tags that only mappers with special knowledge can use correctly (just dive into the world of railways). This doesn't mean these tags

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

Most times, I don't map the number of seats, because I don't have a number of 3-4 friends with me when I'm mapping to test the bench, so I can't tell how many people can sit on it. They installed a few 1-seater "benches" in my locality during lockdown, I added it then. But I agree that it might

Re: [Tagging] camp sites in Haiti

e sites. -Joseph Eisenberg On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:20 AM Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Hello, I noticed that many of the refugee camps in Haiti are tagged as tourism=camp_site which made me uneasy. Turns out there is the tag amenity=refugee_sit

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

Hello all, thanks for all your replies and input. It is however a little frustrating indeed that all this only happens after the discussion period - which is not the first time with my proposals. I think rather than voting against, you should abstain from the vote, if you're only coming out with

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

On 08/10/2022 05:39, Warin wrote: On 8/10/22 04:54, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: I note that settlements are already on the values for the key historic, e.g farm, manor, monastery, castle ... all places where people lived. So historic=crannog would 'work'? If people say

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

Obviously, I support this. It has its own preset scheme in the iD editor, its own icons etc. The following are missing (of the top of my head, because I proposed them) from the list and were approved already: creamery ogham stone

[Tagging] camp sites in Haiti

Hello, I noticed that many of the refugee camps in Haiti are tagged as tourism=camp_site which made me uneasy. Turns out there is the tag amenity=refugee_site. Would it be possible to re-tag those refugee camps in an automated edit? There are about 60 or 70 mapped. I'm not even sure if they all

Re: [Tagging] Re: Lyft and nameless sectioning in OSM

There is such a thing as mixed use with our local authorities, residential+commercial. I wouldn't think residential and industrial mixes because of noise and pollution, at least in theory.Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 12/10/2022, 08:53 Martin

Re: [Tagging] Re: Tagging Digest, Vol 156, Issue 68 Seats or capacity ?

lace seats by capacity       (Anne-Karoline Distel)    6. Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity   (Peter Elderson)    7. Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity    

Re: [Tagging] Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

I agree that an objective value like the actual width would be better. (And I've finally seen what I believe to be 2-seat benches for the first time in my life over the weekend.)Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 02/10/2022, 23:07 Raphael wrote:

[Tagging] feature Proposal - Voting - settlement_type=crannog

Voting has started on the crannog proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog There was only one comment during the fortnight of discussion, so it should be fairly forward. I know there are a lot of discussions about more important tags going on at the moment, but

Re: [Tagging] Re: Route names being applied to tracks/paths

+1Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 30/12/2022, 20:59 Peter Neale via Tagging wrote: +1 PeterPan99 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, 30 Dec 2022 at 20:02, Dave F via Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Private ambulance / patient transport service

Maybe it would be more like an amenity=ambulance_station?--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 03/01/2023, 07:10 Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: Tried asking about this on the Community but no response so I'll bring it out here.

Re: [Tagging] Re: foreign names for stuff, was: "Mörthe und Mosel"

I personally found old, yet now maybe offensive names on OpenStreetMap very useful when I was trying to locate senders' locations of postcards written by German soldiers in WW1 from the eastern and western front. No other online map would have been any help to me, especially since many of the

Re: [Tagging] Re: foreign names for stuff, was: "Mörthe und Mosel"

2023, 04:27: Jan 5, 2023, 17:36 by frede...@remote.org: Hi, On 1/5/23 11:00, Anne- Karoline Distel wrote: I personally found old, yet now maybe offensive names on OpenStreetMap

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - archaeological_site

Hello all, the proposal has been approved with 20 pro and 4 contra votes. Thank you all who took part in the discussion and the vote! Cheers, Anne ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - relation type=sled

Ah, fond childhood memories... Anyway, I was a bit confused about the word "sled", but I get it, now that I have seen the wiki page. How about calling it "sledding", though, in parallel to "walking" or "hiking"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sledding Regards, Anne On 10/12/2022 09:11, Philipp

Re: [Tagging] plantation=yes?

That was my thought at first. But maybe, forest as in "planted woodland" is not necessarily always for chopping down later, they might be planted for recreative purposes or for the air quality. Hard to tell from aerial view, though. On 10/12/2022 17:49, Florian Lohoff wrote: On Sat, Dec 10,

[Tagging] barrows and tumuli

The last couple of days, I've been looking at tumuli/ barrows on the map, because it turns out, it's the same. I have added that information to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:archaeological_site%3Dtumulus). In Ireland and the UK, I've also tried to tidy up the tags, so there

Re: [Tagging] barrows and tumuli

they could be man_made=long_barrow. Phil (trigpoint) On 18 January 2023 15:48:42 GMT, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: The last couple of days, I've been looking at tumuli/ barrows on the map, because it turns out, it's the same. I have added that information to the wiki (https

Re: [Tagging] barrows and tumuli

so known outside The Shire. Phil (trigpoint) On 18 January 2023 17:55:57 GMT, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Well, yes, they're not historic; they're prehistoric. But we tend to map those features with the historic tag nonetheless. I don't understand why you say that they're

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

Hello all, Martin is too busy the next couple of days, so with his permission I have opened the voting booths for the key historic to be approved. The minimum 2 weeks passed a couple of days ago, and the discussion has died down, so hopefully everyone is ready to vote.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

Thanks for pointing that out, I've closed the vote again, and will open again tomorrow. I don't know if that it the procedure when you correct an oversight on the proposal page. Anne On 03/11/2022 12:16, Daniel Capilla wrote: Please, Check the wiki talk page of this proposal before opening

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

The point I was trying to make is that in the iD editor, the field "inscription" comes up as a default and is mis-used for descriptions. I would like to see a way to prevent that. Obviously, a signpost has an inscription, but that field maybe comes up for signpost which I would presume is the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

the vote when he has the time. Anne On 03/11/2022 13:36, Sarah Hoffmann via Tagging wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:56:45AM +, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Hello all, Martin is too busy the next couple of days, so with his permission I have opened the voting booths for the key historic

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

centered around this key can move forward with that fundamental debate unaddressed. On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, 8:56 AM Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Thanks for pointing that out, I've closed the vote again, and will open again tomorrow. I don't know if that it the p

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are considered historic now. :P On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by annekadis...@web.de: I also noticed that the inscription key is used a lot where it should be description. I think that's the

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Key:archaeological_site

Voting is open on the archaeological_site key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:archaeological_site Cheers, Anne ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] drones

What do people think about a key like drone? I'm thinking of heritage sites/ tourist attractions, of course. I noticed on a Welsh heritage site that they had an icon for all the amenities and permissions, and they had one for "Drones not allowed". Obviously, we could add drone=no to every airport

Re: [Tagging] Picnic_table with barbecue table extension.

I recently saw one where just a metal protection was added to the picnic table for the disposable grill. No photo, sorry. I'd be interested in that too. On 22/05/2023 19:00, Dave F via Tagging wrote: https://snipboard.io/H5FYGT.jpghttps://snipboard.io/H5FYGT.jpgHi I've a leisure=picnic_table

[Tagging] Coach parking

I came across a case where someone had added name=coach and name=car to amenity=parking, which is obviously not how we do things, but I can't find a good way to mark coach parking as such. I've added bus=yes in the meantime, but that won't render a bus icon instead of a car icon, I believe, which

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

na need "SUV_parking" soon, because they take up so much space. Anne On 09/06/2023 10:52, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne- Karoline Distel writes: I came across a case where someone had added name=coach and name=car to amenity=parking, which is obviously not how we do things [snip] I can't

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

That's what I mean, tourist busses.  I see now that there is a tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourist_bus), but my point is that it should also be rendered with a bus/ coach symbol. Also, they are often seasonal, at least in Ireland, so during the winter, can be used by cars, but

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

Oh, yeah, it might be useful to create a MapRoulette task to get rid of all the name tags. Anne On 09/06/2023 21:46, Andy Townsend wrote: On 09/06/2023 21:21, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: Since these are all descriptive values in the name which we are not supposed to do, I don't understand

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

It was only a suggestion, I'm not gonna start the Maproulette task. Too much else to do. On 09/06/2023 23:06, Marc_marc wrote: Le 09.06.23 à 23:12, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit : it might be useful to create a MapRoulette task to get rid of all the name tags. if you want to make a mass edit

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

capacity:coach depends entirely on the length/ size of the vehicle. This is the one that started the conversation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608428074 If you look at the mapillary, there is a left arrow for car parking and a right arrow for "bus park". This one is closer to home:

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

On 10/06/2023 20:33, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne-Karoline Distel writes: I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic accidents from other memorials along a road, because I'd really like to know how many there are. Sometimes, it will be difficult to say without local

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

to make that clear. (At least I put some effort into mapping some 17th century wayside crosses in my area as a result. Or what's left of them.) Anne On 10/06/2023 17:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 10 Jun 2023, at 17:58, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: I don't know

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

On 10/06/2023 20:57, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne-Karoline Distel writes: I would say that memorial:cause=traffic_accident would leave the options open whether the victim intended to die or not. OK but IMHO traffic_crash is better. 'accident' is an assertion of no blame, and there are messy

[Tagging] road accident memorials

I would like to be able to differentiate memorials for road traffic accidents from other memorials along a road, because I'd really like to know how many there are. Sometimes, it will be difficult to say without local knowledge whether it was that or maybe if the family uses "accident" as a

Re: [Tagging] Coach parking

Since these are all descriptive values in the name which we are not supposed to do, I don't understand what you're trying to say. Anne On 09/06/2023 13:35, Andy Townsend wrote: On 09/06/2023 10:52, Greg Troxel wrote: Anne- Karoline Distel writes: I came across a case where someone had

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967549672 subject=Sandy or subject=Sandy the dog or subject=pet? Maybe memorial:animal=dog would be an option. Anne On 10/06/2023 23:50, Marc_marc wrote: Le 10.06.23 à 16:40, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit : I would like to be able to differentiate

Re: [Tagging] road accident memorials

I would think that they are still memorials, if they commemorate an accident or suicide. I'm not aware of terribly many use cases for man_made=cross, maybe at open air church service locations or along stations of the cross. Food for thought, anyway. Anne On 11/06/2023 10:29, Mateusz

Re: [Tagging] Re: road accident memorials

023, 11:26 Craig Wallace wrote: On 2023-06-10 20:57, Greg Troxel wrote: > Anne-Karoline Distel writes: > >> I would say that memorial:cause=traffic_accident would leave the options >> open whether the victim intended to die or not. > OK but IMHO tra

[Tagging] ladders

Hello all, in my endeavour to improve the mapping and tagging along waterways, I noticed that there is no approved or documented tag for ladders along shorelines. There is ladder=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ladder), but it seems to be meant for hiking paths and is only rendered

Re: [Tagging] Re: ladders

, emergency steps and emergency paths leading to them all along motorways. Sounds a bit exhaustive to create a new emergency value for each one. An access restriction sounds more reasonable. On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 2:33 PM Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: > > Hello all, >

Re: [Tagging] Area of young trees - saplings

A tree nursery? I think there's a tag for it.My phone won't open the wiki right now, but maybe that helps already.Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 16/05/2023, 13:49 Dave F via Tagging wrote: Is there a tag for areas where you trees are

Re: [Tagging] Re:   Area of young trees - saplings

accessible field. Cheers DaveF On 16/05/2023 15:27, Anne- Karoline Distel wrote: A tree nursery? I think there's a tag for it. My phone won't open the wiki right now, but maybe that helps already. Anne -- Sent from my Android phone

Re: [Tagging] shops for display

Thanks to everyone for their input. I will sustain from using shop=display_only or similar and use advertising tags and shop=vacant instead. Anne On 23/11/2023 02:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: Nov 22, 2023, 22:05 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: sent from a phone On 22

[Tagging] shops for display

Hi, is there a way to tag shops that are not used for selling goods directly, but are just used for display for the actual shop or even to advertise something different? Here in Ireland, I think they are often used to hide the fact that it's actually a vacant premises, and rates are also

Re: [Tagging] Re: shops for display

I agree, but you can't even go in. I've talked to someone, and they said that if you only use the premises for display, you don't have to pay rates.--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 21/11/2023, 12:59 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a

Re: [Tagging] Re: shops for display

My case was where you can't enter the premises, it's really just displaying goods or even (slightly different) displaying contact details for the business which has moved to the outskirts of town.--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 22/11/2023, 10:22

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

=0.584942612357=0 <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.345215550023994=-6.265817519990492=19.230259053537715=516305962724410=photo=0.5077006613416395=0.584942612357=0> On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 15:55, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: That's the best I can do f

Re: [Tagging] Re: tagging "loose" paving stones

. Apparently, as long as it's built on sand, the drainage is pretty good, no mention of a loose setup. Maybe the politician is very good at his job? ;-) Yves Le 21 février 2024 12:25:39 GMT+01:00, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging a écrit : Hi, yes, I

[Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and surface=paved or if what I'm trying to map is covered by either. Where I live, there are some streets that are paved, but the stones aren't set firmly, so they wobble a bit when you drive/ cycle over them. It is perfectly

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

? <https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tordanik-once-again-about-sett-and-cobblestone/85564> Le 17 février 2024 18:19:06 GMT+01:00, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging a écrit : I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and surface=paved or if what I'm

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I asked a local Green politician, and it's apparently called "subsidence paving",  invented in earthquake zones in northern Italy. On 17/02/2024 17:46, Åbn wrote: I think you should provide a picture. On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

. On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and surface=paved or if what I'm trying to map is covered by either. Where I live, there are some streets that are paved, but the stones aren't

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Barbers (hairdresser=barber)

I'm very much for that, I've intuitively started using that as well recently. I had used male=only before, but that's no longer PC and hairdresser=barber makes a lot more sense.Good luck,b-unicycling aka AnneOn 02/02/2024, 16:31 Nathan Case wrote: Hi all, RFC for the proposal to

[Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees

Hello there, does anyone have any opinions about how to map what is called clootie/ cloughtie/ cloutie trees in Scotland and rag trees or raggedy bushes in Ireland? I have used place_of_worship=rag_tree (to avoid the many different spellings) in combination with natural=tree, but there is also a

Re: [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees

ags, of course. On 03/03/2024 20:48, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: Hello there, does anyone have any opinions about how to map what is called clootie/ cloughtie/ cloutie trees in Scotland and rag trees or raggedy bushes in Ireland? I have used place_of_worship=rag_tree (to avoi

Re: [Tagging] Re: clootie trees/ rag trees

at 20:48 +, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: >   > Hello there, >   > does anyone have any opinions about how to map what is called > clootie/ cloughtie/ cloutie trees in Scotland and rag trees or > raggedy bushes in Ireland? I have used place_of_wo

Re: [Tagging] Re: clootie trees/ rag trees

and then subcategories using sacred_tree as a key. tourism=attraction can of course be added in addition.Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 05/03/2024, 10:59 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 4/3/24 07:48, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging