net>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Correvtion, I talked to Dave about two seek ago so there is more than just
one left.
Jim
On 01-Apr-17 11:59, Butch Bussen via Talk wrote:
> Personally, I won't b
net>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Correvtion, I talked to Dave about two seek ago so there is more than just
one left.
Jim
On 01-Apr-17 11:59, Butch Bussen via Talk wrote:
> Personally, I won't buy jaws.
Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I saw on a Microsoft page where they listed the Screen Readers ready for the
Win 10 Creator it did list Window Eyes 9.5.4 as being one that is ready. At
least Microsoft is more considerate than VFO to let us know something
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Correvtion, I talked to Dave about two seek ago so there is more than
just one left.
Jim
On 01-Apr-17 11:59, Butch Bussen via Talk wrote:
> Personally, I won't buy jaws. If WE becomes unuseable, I'll go to n v
> d a. I've d
...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Here are a few thoughts...
The comment about window-eyes not being a going concern related back to
it not being a going concern of VFO not us users
: Saturday, April 1, 2017 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Correvtion, I talked to Dave about two seek ago so there is more than
just one left.
Jim
On 01-Apr-17 11:59, Butch Bussen via Talk wrote:
> Personally, I won't buy jaws. If WE beco
Message -
From: Rod Hutton via Talk
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan,
I believe it is a matter of semantics.
The phrase "not a going concern," to me, imp
I think that I read that Aaron Smith is there.
- Original Message -
From: Jim via Talk
To: Butch Bussen ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Correvtion, I talked to Dave about two seek
ndows doesn't change
where it will no longer work.
- Original Message -
From: Rod Hutton via Talk
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan,
I believe it is a matter of se
iscussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan,
I believe it is a matter of semantics.
The phrase "not a going concern," to me, implies it is not relevant in my life
on a daily basis.
For me, this is not
as Windows doesn't change where it will no longer work.
- Original Message -
From: Rod Hutton via Talk
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan,
I believe it is a matter
it will no longer work.
- Original Message -
From: Rod Hutton via Talk
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan,
I believe it is a matter of semantics.
The phrase "not a
on=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 4:02 AM
To: Dennis Long <dennisl1...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I think it will still be an op
]
On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:26 PM
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Sky and List
I think it is beyond the point of saving Window-Eyes.
I think what folks on this list need to do now is to contact VFO
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 8:38 PM
To: Don H; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi there!
Question, what is the source of your information about W.E. going away?
I have seen nothing official from anyone regarding this issue and until I
do, I
Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:26 PM
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Sky and List
I think it is beyond the point of saving Window-Eyes.
I think what folks on this list need to do now is to contact VFO and
push
: Don H via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:40 PM
To: Dave ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I have said it before I don't know why Microsoft didn't just purchase
Window Eyes and incorporate it into windows. GW had to have been in
serious
to
incorporate into windows, or, at least, making some kind of a deal
with them. Pam.
-Original Message- From: Don H via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:40 PM
To: Dave ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I have said it before I don't know why
ts.window-eyes.com>
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Agree with the below.
How many people took up my suggestion, shared with the list, of drawing your
concerns to the Chief Executive, or someone appropriately senior who can
make decisions of the type which Brenda has sugg
+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:26 PM
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Sky and List
I think it is beyond the point of saving Window-Eyes.
I think what folks
9:40 PM
To: Dave ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I have said it before I don't know why Microsoft didn't just purchase
Window Eyes and incorporate it into windows. GW had to have been in
serious finical trouble for letting AISquared purchase
[mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:26 PM
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Sky and List
I think it is beyond the point of saving
: Friday, March 31, 2017 5:06 AM
To: Dennis Long <dennisl1...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
It won't go away so long as people have copies.
However: is it being developed? Is it ready for
ts.window-eyes.com>
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Agree with the below.
How many people took up my suggestion, shared with the list, of drawing your
concerns to the Chief Executive, or someone appropriately senior who can
make decisions of the type which Brenda has sugg
don't know WE is going away.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:26 PM
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
of window-eyes. Then we will know for certain.
>
> Robert would be livid. He would be doing anything to keep window-eyes
alive.
> The same as we will be doing. He will be proud of us when the time comes.
>
> Live long and prosper, John
>
>
>
>
> These are my thoughts as wel
'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Dave.
I think similarly. And what upset me about this in particular is that the
industry insiders swallowed the press releases hook, line and sinker.
And: as a loyal paying customer for by then 18 years, I
I have said it before I don't know why Microsoft didn't just purchase
Window Eyes and incorporate it into windows. GW had to have been in
serious finical trouble for letting AISquared purchase them when in fact
AIsquared must have been in trouble themselves for VFO having the
ability to
[mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Dave via Talk
Sent: Friday, 31 March 2017 2:18 p.m.
To: Kevin Huber; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
I'm usually able to grasp why Companies do what they do, but I've
I'm usually able to grasp why Companies do what they do, but I've never
understood, from a Fiscal point of view, why GW Micro chose to give a
Free copy of Window Eyes to any Registered MS Office user.
Perhaps they had a deal with Microsoft to receive a "Royalty" of some
kind for every person
via Talk
> Sent: Friday, 31 March 2017 6:26 a.m.
> To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
>
> Hi Sky and List
>
>
> I think it is beyond the point of saving Window-Eyes.
>
>
> I think what folks on th
-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Friday, 31 March 2017 6:26 a.m.
To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Sky and List
I think it is beyond the point of saving Window-Eyes.
I think what folks on this list need to do now
...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Kevin Huber via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:50 AM
To: Vaughan Dodd; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan:
Mostly, I see your point and I would aggree, accept that, if VFO works
out a contract
: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Kevin Huber via Talk
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:50 AM
To: Vaughan Dodd; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
Hi Vaughan:
Mostly, I see your point and I would aggree
Hi Vaughan:
Mostly, I see your point and I would aggree, accept that, if VFO works
out a contract with Microsoft which will allow them to create a JAWS
For Office, presumably Window-eyes, and therefore Window-eyes for
office, will be dead so there will only be two free screen readerws.
Also, if
Yet again, don't hold your breath for this to happen.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:35 PM Vaughan Dodd via Talk <
talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
> I think you'll find that VFO will not do this.
>
> Microsoft funded this, under a contractual basis.
> The contract supporting the Window-Eyes
I think you'll find that VFO will not do this.
Microsoft funded this, under a contractual basis.
The contract supporting the Window-Eyes with Office scheme will most
certainly come to an end.
The financial backers of VFO are funding the continued development of JFW, and
they will expect a
37 matches
Mail list logo
