Grande Island Resort in Subic Bay is using OSM to show their location
in their website: http://www.grandeislandresort.com/location.html
Unfortunately, the marker shown in the map is about a hundred
kilometers off the actual location of the resort:
http://osm.org/go/4zMqrIm?m
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28698126@N02/5763602953/in/photostream/
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
Dear Eugene,
Have you tried sending them a message with the correct html embed code?
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Grande Island Resort in Subic Bay is using OSM to show their location
in their website:
I just sent them an email message (though it was to
sa...@grandeislandresort.com--there was no general email address). :-)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:48 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Eugene,
Have you tried sending them a message with the correct html embed code?
On
I suggest adding the ferry route from the terminal at the Waterfront road to
the Island so that it can be used by the routing services if one requests a
route from Manila to the Island.
I have just added the resort to waypointsdotph:
http://waypoints.ph/vmap.php?wpt=rr0082
If a ferry route is
Hi Ed,
I think there is no problem with adding a non-GPS-based ferry route.
There isn't any major routing decisions to be made for this short
ferry ride and somebody else can improve the ferry route geometry in
the future.
I don't want to add it now though since I'm not sure where the
terminal
I think we can add non-gps ferry route on water bays known to be deep enough
(eg subic area), or no known fishpens or fish cages in the area. (not
recommended in laguna de bay).
In night-time or zero-visibility navigation using untested ferrt route,
smaller pump boats may end up going through
Done: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8283441
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Rally de Leon rall...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we can add non-gps ferry route on water bays known to be deep enough
(eg subic area), or no known fishpens or fish cages in the area. (not
recommended
Hi Rally,
I have a trace of the Dos Palmas ferry route (and even pearl farm) but
i didn't upload them when i saw the route is already there. Perhaps I
can check. Also, the islands of Honda Bay are not tagged they way
locals call the islands...just remembered it now...will correct later
:P
ferry
looks good...not yet available locally? i think it's quite easy to
produce, even an office printer can print stickers
an officemate also egging me to reproduce those Eagles of Makati car
stickers for well..you know the purpose, like those PNP stickers.
simply told them, just follow the rules and
yes, I noticed this technique by the boatmen in dos palmas (keeping the
direction of the boat as perpendicular as possible, rather than parallel to
the direction of the waves) :-)
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:37 AM, tutubi
tut...@backpackingphilippines.comwrote:
Hi Rally,
I have a trace of the
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who can give an introductory
presentation on PGIS or Web 2.0 for Development in the Philippines.
This can be two separate or one unified session.
I will reply directly to your email with details.
Paul___
That's a very big topic IMO. Can you give us more info, is this in
the context of opentreetmap philippines (this list)?
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:07 PM, rosa-decentral
decentral5526-r...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who can give an introductory
presentation on PGIS
Erik Lundin wrote:
Thanks, this was helpful. My JOSM had max zoom level set to 17. Changing
it to 18 or 19 gives a significant increase of the resolution. Just a
small difference between 18/19 in this case.
Yes, that did the trick for mee too. It was on 17.
Regards,
Maarten
2011-05-28
I think a much more useful application than those suggested already is
to identify all of the bridges that cross over a way. It's easy to find
all of the ways that go under a way, but what use is that? It's quite
important for waterways in general to be able to find every bridge that
will be
On 5/29/11, talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org
talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Send talk mailing list submissions to
talk@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
or, via email, send a message with
Hello!
I was sending the following message to the maperitive mailing list,
but I did not see it appearing there... it's why i post it here, even
if it is not completely the right place.
Thank you for any hints!
Regards
Hendrik Oesterlin
Heren,
Ik kom steeds vaker zijweggetjes van hoofdwegen tegen die de zelfde weg dragen
als de hoofdweg. De zijweg is zelf ook verhard en een bord aan het begin van de
weg verwijst naar een aantal huisnummers die bij de hoofdweg horen.
2011/5/29 Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info:
Ik kom steeds vaker zijweggetjes van hoofdwegen tegen die de zelfde weg
dragen als de hoofdweg. De zijweg is zelf ook verhard en een bord aan het
begin van de weg verwijst naar een aantal huisnummers die bij de hoofdweg
horen.
Hallo ZMWandelaar,
Ik kijk meestal naar twee dingen: Hoeveel huizen staan er en oogt de weg als
een oprit (in onderhoud van een particulier) of als weg die door de gemeente
beheert wordt (staan er voorrangborden).
Groeten,
Martien
2011/5/29 Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info
Heren,
Ik
Martien,
En hoe zou je mijn voorbeeld dan beoordelen?
Robert
From: Martien Scheepens
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 5:57 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Serviceweg?
Hallo ZMWandelaar,
Ik kijk meestal naar twee dingen: Hoeveel huizen staan er en oogt de weg als
Er zijn haaientanden te zien op de straat, dus is het waarschijnlijk een
officiële weg en het de straat leidt naar meerdere gebouwen. Ik vind
residential gepast.
Het blijft vaak lastig. Kijk maar naar dit
Olá pessoal,
Neste domingo, ao ler o artigo sobre a Noite no Hipercentro de BH, da
Débora Fantini, na edição de 28 de Maio a 3 de Junho de 2011 do Jornal
Pampulha de BH, notei que foram utilizadas imagens derivadas do
OpenStreetMap, nas páginas 3 e 4, e possivelmente na capa, além do
artigo no
Parece que foi a segunda vez que se tem notícia. O Arlindo tambem pegou um
caso no Rio de Janeiro..
2011/5/29 Samuel Vale srcv...@minaslivre.org
Olá pessoal,
Neste domingo, ao ler o artigo sobre a Noite no Hipercentro de BH, da
Débora Fantini, na edição de 28 de Maio a 3 de Junho de 2011 do
Hallo,
meiner Meinung nach sollte es erstmal einen vernünftigen (intuitiven)
Layer-Switcher geben. Google und bing sind da schon einiges weiter als
wir mit unserem kleinen Plus-Zeichen. Was nutzen viele schöne Layer auf
der Hauptkarte, wenn der normale Benutzer sie nicht findet...
Weiterhin
Hallo,
die Wochennotiz Nr. 45 mit allen Neuigkeiten aus dem OpenStreetMap-Universum
ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2011/05/osm-wochennotiz-nr-45/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011 um 23:20 schrieb malenki:
Aufgrund der überwältigenden Nachfrage gibt es nun die Möglichkeit,
OpenStreetMap über das deutsche Amazon Prozente seines Einkaufes
zukommen zu lassen.
Super!
Es sollte genügen, über diesen Link einzukaufen:
Am 28.05.2011 09:41, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Wir haben keinen Plasberg hier (oder? :D), aber ein Antrag an den
erweiterten Faktencheck:
Man untersuche mal die OSM-Datenbank auf Überschneidungen von Tags und
Tag-Gruppen. Also:
- Überschneiden sich landuses tatsächlich weitgehend NICHT mit
Moin
Es ist also wichtig diese Vielfalt herauszuheben und diese Neueinsteigern
moeglichst gut zu vermitteln.
Eine (einfache) Moeglichkeit diese Vielfalt etwas besser der breiten
Oeffentlichkeit klar zu machen waere indem man zusaetzliche (spezialisierte)
Karten auf der Homepage von
Moin !
für Sportgeschäfte (Tauche, Surfen etc.) allgemein habe ich noch kein
Tag gefunden.
Was haltet Ihr von shop=sport ??
Gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Christian H. Bruhn schrieb:
am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2011 um 23:20 schrieb malenki:
Es sollte genügen, über diesen Link einzukaufen:
http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8tag=opensde-21
Kann man das als Käufer irgendwie überprüfen, ob für den Einkauf
wirklich die Provision abgerechnet wird, oder
Hi,
Markus wrote:
Wer hat schon mal jemand versucht, von Behörden Geodaten aufgrund des
Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes zu bekommen?
In Grossbritannien haben das ein paar Leute gemacht; ich weiss nicht,
wie das hierzulande ist, aber dort verpflichtet das Gesetz nur dazu, die
Informationen dem
Am 29.05.2011 18:52, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Was haltet Ihr von shop=sport ??
Hi, Du könntest mal in taginfo nachschauen und herausfinden,
dass shop=sports (Mehrzahl!!) schon 3200 mal getaggt ist.
Chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo,
Am Sonntag 29 Mai 2011 19:48:05 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
Markus wrote:
Wer hat schon mal jemand versucht, von Behörden Geodaten aufgrund des
Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes zu bekommen?
In Grossbritannien haben das ein paar Leute gemacht; ich weiss nicht,
wie das hierzulande
malenki wrote:
Hinweis zum Datenschutz: Käufernamen und anderes bekommt der
Werbepartner (also ich als Vertreter von OSM) nicht zu sehen.
Die Übersicht sieht so aus, auch in den herunterladbaren Statistiken
...
Hab ich auch erst gestutzt wegen Datenschutz. Ist aber -für mich- ok so.
Die
Walter Nordmann schrieb:
Die Einkaufliste ist allerdings interessant . Ein Schelm, wer da Böses
denkt ...
Schon mal versucht, für Ex-Jugoslawien vernünftige Karten zu besorgen?
(Navi allein macht nicht glücklich.)
Gruß
malenki
___
Talk-de mailing
Am 29.05.2011 18:58, schrieb malenki:
Hinweis zum Datenschutz: Käufernamen und anderes bekommt der
Werbepartner (also ich als Vertreter von OSM) nicht zu sehen.
Die Übersicht sieht so aus, auch in den herunterladbaren Statistiken
ist nicht mehr drin:
moin
naja gerade solche doch recht abstrus anmutenden karten wie ne
hochspannungskarte sollten auch in solch eine liste.
ner landratte aus den alpen wird sich auch bei der openseamap fragen was das
soll... umgekehrt wird sich der ein oder andere segler wohl auch über ne
wanderkarte mit
Open Series maps (Paper prints) of SOI are on 1:5 scale (2cm = 1 km), and
this is actually not a news, but may be an emphasis on road net work might be.
Ravi
From: Srikanth Lakshmanan srik@gmail.com
To: talk-in@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, May 28,
Vorrei taggare correttamente dei ponti stradali che si alzano permettendo
alle imbarcazioni di passare nel canale sottostante.
E' corretto bridge=draw ?
Fabrizio
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Für mich klingt das alles schon ein bisschen sehr nach wir machen uns
die Welt wie sie uns gefällt und hat mE deshalb auch nichts in OSM
verloren, weils eben einfach nichts abbildet was objektiv in der
Realität existiert. Im konkreten Anwendungsfall würde ich einfach diese
Daten in einer
@Daniel:
I finally got around to add a few more issues to the page mentioned by
Adam last week. I'm not sure if you or anyone else also encountered
them, but here they are:
* Some roads are tagged as highway=unclasified (with one 's').
These are mostly linking roads, and usually have
Le 29/05/2011 04:18, Pierre Béland a écrit :
Jean-Guilhem Cailton wrote on2011-05-28
I put the EO1-ALI images from Earth Observatory online, in WMS and
TMS, with the coordinates included in the GeoTiff files.
I created a openlayers page accessing the two images. We have the
ability to
Lionel Gueganton a écrit , Le 28/05/2011 21:10:
C'est un vrai partenariat qui unira les *fabricants*avec *l'Etat*où ce
dernier devra fournir les *limitations de vitesse*, *l'état du traffic
*et *les zones dangereuses*.
Reste à voir comment, sous quelle license.
Je plussois ; perso, en
Merci pour le OSmecum !
Ca répond en grande partie à ma question.
Cdt
- Mail Original -
De: Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com
À: talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Samedi 28 Mai 2011 00h18:57 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk-fr]
Le 29/05/2011 08:45, Hélène PETIT a écrit :
Lionel Gueganton a écrit , Le 28/05/2011 21:10:
C'est un vrai partenariat qui unira les *fabricants*avec *l'Etat*où ce
dernier devra fournir les *limitations de vitesse*, *l'état du traffic
*et *les zones dangereuses*.
Reste à voir comment, sous
Le 29/05/2011 10:09, piratebab a écrit :
Le 29/05/2011 08:45, Hélène PETIT a écrit :
Lionel Gueganton a écrit , Le 28/05/2011 21:10:
C'est un vrai partenariat qui unira les *fabricants*avec *l'Etat*où ce
dernier devra fournir les *limitations de vitesse*, *l'état du traffic
*et *les zones
Le 29/05/2011 11:33, sechanb...@free.fr a écrit :
- JonathanMM jonatha...@nocle.fr a écrit :
Le 29/05/2011 10:09, piratebab a écrit :
Le 29/05/2011 08:45, Hélène PETIT a écrit :
Lionel Gueganton a écrit , Le 28/05/2011 21:10:
C'est un vrai partenariat qui unira les *fabricants*avec
Selon le wiki, normalement, le maxspeed est implicite dans la plupart
des cas : Un highway=residential ou unclassified dans une ville par
exemple implique maxspeed=50
C'est tellement implicite qu'on a du mal à définir en pratique dans une
ville.
Ça renvoie aussi un peu sur la discussion sur
Le 29 mai 2011 12:33, Eric SIBERT courr...@eric.sibert.fr a écrit :
Selon le wiki, normalement, le maxspeed est implicite dans la plupart
des cas : Un highway=residential ou unclassified dans une ville par
exemple implique maxspeed=50
C'est tellement implicite qu'on a du mal à définir en
Bonjour,
A ce propos des radars, je travaille essentiellement sur Poitiers et pour
l'instant, nous n'avons pas cartographié tous les radars.
Alors je me suis essayé à un radar de vitesse, mais même après plusieurs
tentative, lors de l'envoi j'ai une erreur
type de relation inconnu
J'ai
Salut,
je confirme tes propos. J'aimerais bien savoir parfois a quelle vitesse je
dois aller vu le manque de panneau dans certaines zones.
Emilie Laffray
2011/5/29 Hélène PETIT h...@free.fr
Je plussois ; perso, en conduisant je me fiche de savoir où sont les
radars, ce que je veux, c'est
Bonjour,
J'ai plusieurs nom de rue de cette forme :
Allée Jean Louis BAUER (1930 - 2007)
Rescapé du camp d'internement de Poitiers, Président de l'association nationale
des victimes et des familles de victimes tziganes
Comme j'ai fait l'effort de relever ces infos, comment je rentre ça
name=Allée Jean Louis Bauer (1930 - 2007)
Mais pour le reste dois-je le faire figurer dans le base de données et si
oui sous quel tag ?
À mon avis le nom de la rue proprement dit c'est juste name=Allée
Jean-Louis Bauer (attention peut-être au trait d'union) ; les autres
infos c'est à mettre
Le 29/05/2011 12:33, Eric SIBERT a écrit :
Selon le wiki, normalement, le maxspeed est implicite dans la plupart
des cas : Un highway=residential ou unclassified dans une ville par
exemple implique maxspeed=50
C'est tellement implicite qu'on a du mal à définir en pratique dans
une ville.
Ça
Salut,
Voici à priori comment décrire une relation de radar, celui ci par ex :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1297864
Un radar est une relation avec les tags
enforcement = maxspeed
maxspeed = 50
type = enforcement
qui permettent de décrire le type de controle et la vitesse limite.
Question que je me pose aussi depuis longtemps ! comment fait un
logiciel de routage pour savoir qu'un way est dans une ville ?
J'avais imaginé un premier critère simple : a l'intérieur d'un
landuse=residential. Après, il faut gérer les cas particulier, les
exceptions, etc.
Ça, c'est
On 29. 05. 11 20:35, Eric SIBERT wrote:
Question que je me pose aussi depuis longtemps ! comment fait un
logiciel de routage pour savoir qu'un way est dans une ville ?
J'avais imaginé un premier critère simple : a l'intérieur d'un
landuse=residential. Après, il faut gérer les cas
Le 29/05/2011 12:40, Art Penteur a écrit :
Le 29 mai 2011 12:33, Eric SIBERT courr...@eric.sibert.fr a écrit :
Selon le wiki, normalement, le maxspeed est implicite dans la plupart
des cas : Un highway=residential ou unclassified dans une ville par
exemple implique maxspeed=50
C'est tellement
Bonsoir,
Le 29/05/2011 19:20, Damouns a écrit :
name=Allée Jean Louis Bauer (1930 - 2007)
Mais pour le reste dois-je le faire figurer dans le base de données et si
oui sous quel tag ?
À mon avis le nom de la rue proprement dit c'est juste name=Allée
Jean-Louis Bauer (attention peut-être
Le 29/05/2011 20:55, JonathanMM a écrit :
Le 29/05/2011 12:40, Art Penteur a écrit :
J'avais imaginé un premier critère simple : a l'intérieur d'un
landuse=residential. Après, il faut gérer les cas particulier, les
exceptions, etc.
Art.
Perso, je pensais plutôt à s'il est dans les
Bonsoir à tous
Rapport au thread sur Leaflet voici un exemple d'utilisation ...
http://www.unpiedsurterre.fr/carnet-voyage-cob.html
http://www.unpiedsurterre.fr/carnet-voyage-cob.htmlLionel
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
Voire dans une balise wikipedia=* comme suggéré dans ce fil (voir ce
message et les suivants) :
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2011-April/031918.html
Euh, non, pas de wikipedia !
Le lien wikipedia ne devrait référencer que l'article concernant l'objet
taggué (ici une
背景画像の解像度が
Potlatch2と比べるとJOSMが低いという投稿があり
結局、JOSMの設定で最大解像度を低く設定していたのが原因だったそうです。
JOSMで思ったような解像度が得られていないとお感じの方がおられましたら
下記設定を確認してみると良いかもしれません。
デフォルトは18だそうです。22くらいに設定しておいた方が良いと思います。
編集＞設定＞WMS/TMS＞設定＞最大ズームlvl:
解像度分布状況は下記参照。
On 5/29/2011 1:50 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:00:25 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/29/2011 12:37 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
US-441 between St. Cloud and Yeehaw Junction could easily be trunk by
NE2's definition
Nope, since any through traffic will be on the Turnpike. US
On Sun, 29 May 2011 02:18:09 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/29/2011 1:50 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
It's actually faster to take 441 to Yeehaw and get on the turnpike
there
when traveling from eastern and southeastern Orlando to points south
of
Port St. Lucie.
Even with the four-laning
On 5/29/2011 2:30 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
I think that trunk is more useful if it's prescriptive, more along the
lines of a motorway than primary and below. If we aren't going to do
that, we need to come up with another value for highway and get it
rendered by default. It's something that map
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Nathan Mills nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
Would I be correct in stating that tagging an undivided 2 lane (one lane in
each direction) highways would be improper, even if a state calls the
highway a trunk for planning purposes?
No, you wouldn't. Trunk is the proper
On Sun, 29 May 2011 03:00:03 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Perhaps the best way to handle it would be to render a wider line if
oneway=yes and not lanes=1 or if oneway=no/unset and lanes=4 or more.
Thus divided highways would not need a lane count to be wider, but
undivided roads would need to
I just happened to notice this guy tonight was going around and editing the
ref tags on highways in the US just to replace the space and put in the
hyphen. (I noticed this when going to load the I-77 NC relation to add in speed
limits I saw and wrote down on a recent trip to Charlotte because
My idea was to write letters to the editors of all the local
newspapers, in each letter we would tell the about the map and invite
them to look at the local map of thier area
I wrote a script to automate the usage of the press center :
http://capwiz.com/aauw/dbq/media/
here is the code, you can
Am 29.05.2011 15:49, schrieb Mike Dupont:
My idea was to write letters to the editors of all the local
newspapers, in each letter we would tell the about the map and invite
them to look at the local map of thier area
I wrote a script to automate the usage of the press center :
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many types of roads that it's not possible to describe. How
do
you tag an unpaved classified road so the map shows that it's unpaved
(this is very common in the third world, but also occurs in extremely
rural areas of the US)? You don't.
i'm deliberately not quoting or responding here in order
to break out of the current, somewhat circular discussion.
the trunk classification does two things:
1) it influences rendering engines
2) it influences routing
we all are familiar with what impact 1 has, but i think a lot of folks are
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where maxspeed
data is missing, but probably only to derive guesstimates of maxspeed
values.
Now that I think about it, that's actually an excellent reason
On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where maxspeed
data is missing, but probably only to derive guesstimates of maxspeed
values.
Now that I think about it,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where
maxspeed
data is missing, but
On 5/29/11 11:59 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/29/11 11:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
Yes I too think a few tweeks to make it more US centric would be good,
though, to make sure it attracts people in the US with their needs.
I'm willing to either (a) take suggestions on what should be changed
(note that for the English-language flyer we already rotated
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/29/11 11:59 AM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, why argue about it? If you have a reason to start
aggressively collecting data the missing maxspeed data, just do it.
argue in the sense of a civil discussion of two
On 05/21/2011 10:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Those of you who get off on schadenfreude might be interested in this
thread: http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4464.0
Right now, Google is showing US 30 in Oregon as Quebec Provincial Route
366. Good times...
signature.asc
On 05/28/2011 12:19 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Mike N
niceman-fodfmywu...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On 5/28/2011 9:12 AM, Anthony wrote:
Trunk has no meaning beyond color the road the same color as other
things that are tagged trunk.
Even color is not defined -
On 05/28/2011 06:13 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2011 20:54:07 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
You described your criteria, but did not explain how trunk is more
appropriate than primary for a two lane rural highway between two
small-to-tiny cities. If you use trunk for that, there
On 05/29/2011 08:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Welty
rwelty-Fu78d/dmhrmzesifbgk...@public.gmane.org wrote:
in short: a routing engine will probably use classifications where maxspeed
data is missing, but probably only to derive guesstimates of maxspeed
Hi,
Paul Johnson wrote:
So how would that bring us closer to having global consistency, since
the scope of OSM is worldwide?
It is a common misconception that OSM should have globally consistent
tagging standards since OSM is a world-wide project.
If someone were to really demand that, the
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 05/29/2011 08:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Welty
rwelty-Fu78d/dmhrmzesifbgk...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Now that I think about it, that's actually an excellent reason why
On 05/29/2011 12:56 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Paul Johnson
baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On 05/29/2011 08:37 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Richard Welty
rwelty-Fu78d/dmhrmzesifbgk...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Now that I
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 05/29/2011 12:56 PM, Anthony wrote:
What do you mean by global consistency and why is it desired?
Having some kind of uniformity on a large scale means you wouldn't have
to learn how to read the map again just because
On Sun, 29 May 2011 12:09:30 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm thinking the differences between motorways and trunks are minor.
Trunks may have intersections, motorways don't.
That's the simple way to state my opinion. It also seemed to be the
thrust of most of the discussion on the talk page
On 05/29/2011 02:00 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Paul Johnson
baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On 05/29/2011 12:56 PM, Anthony wrote:
What do you mean by global consistency and why is it desired?
Having some kind of uniformity on a large scale
On 5/29/2011 5:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
subtle mass vandalism
This is why I ignore Paul.
Though I really wonder about this edit:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/14751094/history
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:00:33 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/29/2011 5:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
subtle mass vandalism
This is why I ignore Paul.
Though I really wonder about this edit:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/14751094/history
Using your standard, there's nothing to
On 5/29/2011 8:09 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
FSM knows the aerial imagery around here is outdated, to put it mildly.
Try the NAIP imagery:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Agriculture_Imagery_Program
___
Talk-us mailing list
Hola a todos,
El día 27 de mayo de 2011 14:36, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl escribió:
Sebastian,
Los datos son útiles, como dijo Danilo uno de los aspectos mas relevantes es
que estén liberados de manera compatible con la licencias de OSM (CCBYSA y
ODbL).
Claro, no
Great! Keep going.
A+,
Guens
--- En date de : Dim 29.5.11, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com a écrit :
De: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com
Objet: Re: [Talk-ht] [HOT] Lost Bing Coverage for SW Haiti!?
À: Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com, Talk-HT@OSM
Talk-HT@openstreetmap.org,
95 matches
Mail list logo
