Andrew beat me to it.
There is a speed restriction associated with the "Must use low gear
signs" under the road rules.
It states:
"you must drive in a gear that is low enough to limit the speed of your
vehicle without using the foot brake."
Unfortunately it's not a defined limit although
It may be shown as tertiary but I'd be cautious about removing 4wd_only
based on the NSW basemap only.
Have you had a look at the NSW imagery for that area or checked any
other form of road conditions eg.
Hi Martijin,
When an upload completes how long should it take to show on the
openstreetcam.org website?
Cheers
Ross
On 19/03/19 01:08, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Howdy.
We had a good time with the first OpenStreetCam competition, the
winners received their prizes, and we decided to hold
Welcome to oz roads.
I had a look on street view and can not see any 60 signs along Warwick
Road they are all 70.
Cheers
Ross
On 09/03/19 10:20, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 08:48, Ross Scanlon <mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com>> wrote:
What you've said i
| In some situations, especially on off-ramps, there isn’t any speed
limit sign at the beginning of the link only at the end of it or in the
| middle. I observed that in these situations the speed limit of the
motorway is added on the first part of the link. Because this is the
| predominant
Contact the Data Working Group
On 09/09/17 10:34, Philip Mallis wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking advice on how to proceed with an issue around Melbourne
and Victoria regarding tagging of abandoned/disused railway stations
and railways.
The Outer Circle Line is a railway that has been almost
On 11/02/17 12:21, Warin wrote:
On 11-Feb-17 11:28 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On 11/02/17 07:00, Warin wrote:
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road
classifications .. tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take
On 11/02/17 07:00, Warin wrote:
The NSW LPT base map is particularly helpful for road classifications
.. tracks, unclassified, tertiary and paths.
It is in some ways better than a survey as it looks to take into
account the importance to the community and that is very hard to
determine by
On 08/02/17 11:17, Warin wrote:
On 08-Feb-17 12:10 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
On 08/02/17 11:00, Warin wrote:
Some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... so ?
I will ask on the tagging list as it is not Australian specific.
I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground
not
the type of pipeline.
On 08-Feb-17 11:31 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
park=pipeline_reserve
On 08/02/17 10:29, Adam Horan wrote:
My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline
reserves.
I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have public
access for walking
, Ross Scanlon <i...@4x4falcon.com
<mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com>> wrote:
park=pipeline_reserve
On 08/02/17 10:29, Adam Horan wrote:
My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline
reserves.
I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to
capad
On 08/02/17 09:49, nwastra wrote:
Hi
I have found many problems with the Heathcote-Graytown National Park in
Victoria.
Is there a place from which I can download the boundary as we have done with
the NSW LPI NPWSReserve - public/NSW_Administrative_Boundaries, so I sort out
where the
All the imagery hosted on openstreetmap servers as listed here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery#Imagery_hosted_on_OSM_servers
Except for the South African imagery.
Cheers
Ross
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
All the imagery hosted on openstreetmap servers as listed here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery#Imagery_hosted_on_OSM_servers
Except for the South African imagery.
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Split the way at the railway tracks, add name="Smith Street", add
alt_name="Lalbert - Kerang Road" to the section west of the railway.
Like this:
http://map.fosm.org/browse/way/102503479#map/18/-35.676/143.377
Cheers
Ross
On 16/01/17 10:30, Simon Slater wrote:
G'day all,
We needed
Still not available.
Any update on when it's likely to be back.
Cheers
Ross
On 17/10/14 08:40, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Any update on when this will be fixed?
Cheers
Ross
On 10/08/14 23:54, Grant Slater wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry... Not yet been able to get access to the broken machine
As the title says agri.openstreetmap.org does not appear to be working.
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Thanks.
It can also be used in josm.
Edit-Preferences-WMS/TMS
add a new tms
http://whoots.mapwarper.net:80/tms/{zoom}/{x}/{y}/WEB_MERCATOR/http://api.maps.vic.gov.au/geowebcacheWM/service/wms?VERSION=1.1.1TILED=true
Cheers
Ross
On 14/05/14 11:08, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
I've just
On 24/02/14 12:01, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer that you can't get in contact with morb_au
Have you tried twitter?
A search there shows he's still around but possibly not really
interested in osm any more.
His first diary post gives a hint to the dis-interest.
Cheers
Ross
If DWG has put a block then he can not edit until responding to it to
the DWG.
That's not to say he can not make another user name.
Cheers
Ross
On 17/02/14 09:27, Jason Ward wrote:
It still leaves correction of errors up to the community I'm afraid and
if he ignores that message in the user
Contact the DWG, get them to put a block on this user.
Then you can do something about the edits.
This is similar to previous vandalism in the Perth area by the likes of
user Brendan_Cherry
Cheers
Ross
On 16/02/14 13:23, Leon Kernan wrote:
Problem is that some of these were tagged under
If the DWG does not respond then try contacting
Frederik Ramm at;
frederik at remote dot org
He is usually very helpful with instances of vandalism.
Cheers
Ross
On 16/02/14 13:46, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Contact the DWG, get them to put a block on this user.
Then you can do something about
the tags as literally as possible (in that case, I would go
addr:city=Brisbane and addr:suburb=The Gap).
What would be the best way to decide on a convention so we can add
guidelines for OSM-AU?
Cheers
Stéphane (chtfn)
On 19/01/14 11:04, Ross Scanlon wrote:
I'd suggest you check this page
http
I came to this because I was asking myself:
- Are we using QLD or Queensland for addr:state?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:state
- What is our definition of suburb vs city for the tags? (e.g. The Gap
vs Brisbane. Postal addresses only contain The Gap, and it is referred
as a suburb
On 08/01/14 10:26, Warin wrote:
Hi,
Some thoughts on Australian Tagging Guidelines - OpenStreetMap Wiki.htm
First it is very good - covers most common issues. In fact I'd call it
excellent.
But .. there could be some additions?
How do you tag a 'Gully'? .. I've used waterway=stream
On 31/12/13 10:17, Warin wrote:
Hi,
I've noted that some (if not all) of the Australian Square Kilometer
Telescope north east of Murchison WA is entered (and has been for some
time) in OSM but it does not show up on my Garmin maps.
26.7S 116.7E
entries are
key man_made value radio telescope
On 19/12/13 11:07, Warin wrote:
Hi,
I though I changed this ..
Where Devlins Creek goes under the M2
The creek is at 'gound level' - as are the path to the east and the
'cycleway' (actually cycle + foot + emergency vehicles) to the west.
The M2 is on a small bridge at that point .. you may
to reference the bing imagery to the gps traces or roads marked
as source= survey or nearmap or agri.
Cheers
Ross
On Sat 07 Dec 2013 15:29:54 EST, Ross Scanlon wrote:
But where should the node go? Referring to here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/associatedAddress
it seems like
a
couple meter shift in this area, so things line up but the roads are
offset a bit - I can't decide whether to recenter my points around the
roads or not, since presumably if it's ever correct a big shift would
then line everything up nicely.
On Sat 07 Dec 2013 15:29:54 EST, Ross Scanlon wrote
make sense
provided I stuck address points at all the entrances?
On 05/12/13 21:07, Ross Scanlon wrote:
I'd suggest you read these wiki pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address
My personal opinion is that the address should be on a separate
I'd suggest you read these wiki pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address
My personal opinion is that the address should be on a separate node at
the entrance to the property. This is preferred for disability access
programs.
It also
- so there are clear examples of both the public
and commercial sectors benefiting from this sort of open data.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
·Street Address Limitations ( missing streets and street numbers)
Make
·Street Address Limitations ( missing streets and street numbers)
Make a dataset like this available for inclusion in openstreetmap
http://www.data.vic.gov.au/raw_data/vicmap-address/4875
Would resolve the above fairly rapidly.
Cheers
Ross
·walking paths data not included across many of
Revert to java 6
The message on the start up screen has been there for ages and it's
sometime soon.
I'm using ubuntu 12.04 as well and have no problems running josm with
java 6.
Cheers
Ross
On 27/10/13 11:27, Arthur Geeson wrote:
Hi,
Firstly a thank you to the replies I got about the
licensing (Ross Scanlon)
2. Re: South Australia Suburb Boundries (Daniel O'Connor)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:57:13 +1000
From: Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com
To: talk
Cut the data into small chunks (0.25 x 0.25 deg).
Load each chunk it into josm.
Download the relevant area to a separate layer.
Compare with what is already there.
Expect to spend a least 2 hours with each chunk depending on what data
your adding.
Cheers
Ross
On 11/10/13 06:37, Li wrote:
Sounds more like the caching within JOSM.
Cheers
Ross
On 12/09/13 23:15, Grant Slater wrote:
Hi Ian,
The api.openstreetmap.org map data servers send no-cache headers and
proxy/caches should therefore NOT be caching the results...
But some ISPs are too aggressive with their caching.
Make
On 24/08/13 17:46, Lester Caine wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can just cut and paste
On 24/08/13 19:39, Lester Caine wrote:
Ross Scanlon wrote:
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
If what you are talking about is the change in style on the roads to the
right, then how were they generated as they do not appear on the main
database? It's nice to see I can
I think this is the type of rendering that Darren is looking for:
informationfreeway.org/?lat=-20.374lon=148.633zoom=15layers=00F000B0
You'll have to copy and paste the link.
Notice the broken casing on the sides of some of the roads.
Cheers
Ross
On 24/08/13 03:58, Darren Biggs wrote:
That
Did they confirm with Geoscience that the Creative Commons Attribution
3.0 Australia is compatible with ODBL?
This is one of the reservations that some of us had with changing to ODBL.
Also you will find it's not that easy. It takes a significant amount of
time and effort to include this
Hi
I am all to aware of the 2000 node limit with OSM but when using JOSM to
create lakes as multipolygons from multiple ways it is easier to create
the ways, link them a multipolygon relationship, tag properties and
upload. JOSM then creates a change set and gives five tries and fails so
if you
a
similar problem. So I align lakes in Polatch 2 and all works well.
Finding JOSM very powerful but still very much a newbie with it.
Cheers
Brett Russell
PO Box 94
Launceston Tas. 7250
Australia
0419 374 971
On 25/06/2013, at 1:25 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com
Australia
0419 374 971
On 25/06/2013, at 1:25 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Hi
I am all to aware of the 2000 node limit with OSM but when using
JOSM to
create lakes as multipolygons from multiple ways it is easier
On 16/12/12 16:50, Russell Edwards wrote:
Could I ask a newbie question on this topic?
I want to update some roads that are 4wd-only in certain sections.
Any new approach aside, what is the best way to do this -- a) what tag
do I use, and b) how do I handle the changing traversibility -
For rendering, no surface= or surface=asphalt/concrete/paved would
produce the current rendering. Any other surface= would produce a dashed
line/casing. To me that's a relatively simple distinction that would be
more appealing to those maintaining the renderers.
I've been working on this
And the only area it's done like this is in Melbourne.
Cheers
Ross
On 03/11/12 17:03, John Henderson wrote:
Steer wrote:
I have been trying to find the accepted practise for mapping traffic
lights where dual carriageways interest. There is much discussion
on various sites, but most seems to
On 27/10/12 18:52, Chris Barham wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Li Xia lisxia1...@gmail.com
mailto:lisxia1...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
1. Can anyone suggest tags other than the following?
name:different
place:locality
source: © Commonwealth of Australia (GeoScience
You point out the problem with this:
tracktype is ignored on everything except highway=track
You would have to modify this in the rendering anyway.
As 4wd_only can apply to any highway= tag it is more appropriate.
From memory this was part of the original discussion when 4wd_only was
On 26/10/12 08:43, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On 22/10/12 11:20, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Mapnik 2 will allow tagging of 4wd_only=recommended and 4wd_only=yes.
An example of 4wd_only=yes here:
http://map.4x4falcon.com/?zoom=14lat=-20.73023lon=116.99701layers=B0F
The 4wd_only=recommended is similar
Mapnik 2 will allow tagging of 4wd_only=recommended and 4wd_only=yes.
An example of 4wd_only=yes here:
http://map.4x4falcon.com/?zoom=14lat=-20.73023lon=116.99701layers=B0F
The 4wd_only=recommended is similar but shows 4WD Recommended.
It is a trivial matter with Mapnik 2 to use text
I'm happy for you to use that link as a reference.
I'll refrain from commenting on the remainder of that para.
When the 4wd_only tagging was introduced it was attempted to get this
included in the mapping but there was reluctance to do so.
Like most proposals it did not have a rendering
On 20/09/12 22:30, Stephen Hope wrote:
I'm not saying that a mini-roundabout isn't a roundabout, it is, and all
the normal signs and laws apply. What it also is, however, is
traversable. If you have a vehicle that cannot go around it, because it
is too large, then you're allowed to go over it.
something that will enable me to check my Garmin 62s' accuracy and give
the ability to align Bing when I find them on the ground providing that
they can be seen from Bing. Be great if they are in nice circles of
I doubt if you'll see them on bing as most survey points are way too small.
You'd
On 19/09/12 19:28, Michael James wrote:
On 09/19/2012 04:35 PM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
They are not mini-roundabouts if you can not drive over them.
Look here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
Also read the Australian Tagging Guidelines here
On 29/07/12 00:58, Andrew Allison wrote:
Hello:
I'm doing some arm chair mapping of Broome and surrounding area from
Canada. I'd appreciate a quick review from someone more familiar with
the local area. I might be mistaking dirt tracks for dried creek beds.
Any mentoring would
On 20/07/12 09:43, Simon Poole wrote:
As all probably know we have two large areas where data had to be
removed, Poland and Australia besides a number of smallish hotspots.
I would think it would be a really good idea to set up a HOT tasking
server (no idea about it inner workings and if it
Maybe you need to send them a message directly and point them to these
pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Cheers
Ross
On 08/04/12 07:01, Michael James wrote:
I would have introduced myself normally
On 23/03/12 21:04, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 23/03/2012 13:47, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
On 3/23/2012 8:36 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
User chdr (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chdr) seems to be
running a script to automatically replace street name abbreviations
with the full word.
so
/me is waiting for someone to make the obvious and completely useless
suggestion of some bonkers noexit hierarchy. noexit=bus, noexit=mouse,
noexit=elephant, noexit=blue_whale
noexit=flying_pig
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 25/01/12 19:14, Don Thomas wrote:
1/ In our area there are a number of small sections of road subject to
flooding, generally they are at small bridges/ causeways and the like. I
can't work out how they should be marked, can some one advice me please?
Are these fords or just sections of road
I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
(Brisbane) with changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10338587
Hi,
Can you just explain this a little bit further? My understanding is it
is a pretty specific set of these maxspeed changes we are
On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ian Sergeantinas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 January 2012 13:12, Richard Weaitrich...@weait.com wrote:
I've removed the maxspeed tags from about 1000 roads in Redcliffe
(Brisbane) with changeset
On 09/01/12 13:47, Richard Weait wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Ross Scanloni...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 09/01/12 11:51, Richard Weait wrote:
Shall I revert?
I think it would be best if you reverted.
Done. You want to take a go at clearing some of these up?
Are they
On 08/01/12 08:20, Nick Hocking wrote:
David wrote
I can always retag from my records after the split
Hi David,
It does seem that most of your work will survive.
Those maxspeed edits done by bots (under the userid of
JohnSmith or Rosscoe) will disappear without harm in April.
A lot of them are
On 08/01/12 11:11, Peter Watson wrote:
If a way is cut to add a bridge or whatever the second part becomes
yours as V1 but the nodes will still be the original contributors. Hence
a seemingly good way with red nodes. This is outlined on the wiki under
remapping.
This is new information, ie the
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Mark Pulleymrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
How should I mark 4wd trails? Thanks,
highway=track; surface=unpaved; if 4wd only then also add 4wd_only=yes
From experience I've found this is really hard to determine. Often the
road quality varies and I don't really
But not what constitutes a 4WD-only track, or how to indicate the
difference between 4WD-only signposted and I don't think a 2WD can
drive here, which as I've pointed out isn't accurate, or how to
indicate only modified vehicles with diff locks, upgraded suspension and
winches are suitable, or
Hi,
Although you are probably correct, I'd suggest you don't modify this
until someone with local knowledge looks at it and/or confirms with you
this is correct.
It also looks that this may be some more vandalism by Q4004.
Cheers
Ross
On 31/12/11 01:25, Michael wrote:
Hi all,
at
The nodes would be fine if not from a ct-declining contributor. If not
then they need to be replaced.
Cheers
Ross
On 23/12/11 14:31, Ben Johnson wrote:
Thanks Ben that's a great idea. I'll keep whatever nodes I can and
extrapolate from there.
I really didn't want this raising old wounds,
On 18/12/11 16:43, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Where do these official gazetted boundaries come from?
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Ross Scanloni...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Wait for an import of the oficial gazetted boundaries.
Australian Bureau of Statistics
Cheers
Ross
On 18/12/11 17:07, Sam Wilson wrote:
Yes, I've often wondered the same: if they're officially defined as
following particular roads etc. and then those roads move, do the
boundaries move also?
No. Do a search through the archives of the list and you'll find this
somewhere.
Also, there
Yep, quite true.
That said, given the complete failure of the most other government
agencies to release the real gazetted boundaries under a free license,
having the ABS data I think is better than nothing, unless you can
obtain more fine grain data from on the ground surveys.
Licensing aside
On 19/12/11 08:38, Ben Kelley wrote:
What happens where the current boundaries have been edited since the
initial import?
e.g. Where the boundary follows some geographical feature that is
difficult to survey, like a river.
Often the river tags have been added to the ABS data way. Removing the
That's fine so long as you are not transferring any tags from the
original way.
See Frederik's comments to NE2 re this, on the osm-talk list.
Mind you, you've got a lot to do in AU.
Cheers
Ross
On 14/12/11 13:56, John Henderson wrote:
As time and opportunity arises, I've started
Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
This is the same as what the user did with the data in Sydney and it was
removed by the data working group.
It's also what Frederik was discussing on the talk list in regards
to NE2.
You are not resolving the issue of the original data
to fix it
but the pre licence change lockout prevented this
Ross, that's not my understanding of the situation at all.
On 25 August 2010 14:40, Ross Scanlon info at 4x4falcon.com
http://4x4falcon.com wrote:
John are you going to do this?
JohnSmith replied
I'm stuck on 3G atm, I may
there tonight.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com
mailto:snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 27/11/11 11:59, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Just reading this:
https://docs.google.com/a/__osmfoundation.org/document/__pub?id=__1zMm5p70Hd6dalxte42DVCGAW-__C9Muy0pjHCZ8xWJT4w
Ok lets look at one intersection:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2lat=-37.757227lon=145.354724zoom=18
This will open in potlatch 2 or you can view it here on the map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.75735lon=145.355389zoom=18
ways 136173430, 13673431, 13673419,
Just reading this:
https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/pub?id=1zMm5p70Hd6dalxte42DVCGAW-C9Muy0pjHCZ8xWJT4w
While people still continue to map garbage like these intersections:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.882577lon=145.276362zoom=18
then people will not want to use
Just came across this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.651744lon=115.86618zoom=18
There is no way in the world that this is a mini roundabout.
Here is the nearmap imagery for it, I know it can't be used now for osm
but using it here for reference:
On 06/09/11 10:50, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 6 September 2011 07:13, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com
mailto:ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
In general I think it is common that a highway has a different name
when it goes through a town. Here the route continues, and will
often be
On 06/09/11 11:26, Ian Sergeant wrote:
Hi Richard,
Welcome to OSM.
A few observations.
Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not
allow traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least
one of your edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more.
On 06/09/11 11:43, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 6 September 2011 13:21, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com
mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
No. The route is still the Princes Highway as per here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Australian_Tagging___Guidelines#Route_Numbers
http
Neil Penman wrote:
Yes the Coober Pedy golf course is almost identical to the google maps
representation. Using google earth it does however seem to me that the
golf course in that area (no grass of course) but the area marked on the
maps only covers a small part of the total course, maybe
Ian Sergeant wrote:
As far as street names are concerned, we could just pick up the names
for the streets currently unnamed by survey from the Atlas of SA, and
attribute appropriately.
If someone gets updated names from survey, they can update. Until then
the temptation to just add them
Neil Penman wrote:
I could be wrong about this but It looks to me like Rosscoe added the
street names for Marree. Most of the information in the changeset you
referenced is for Coober Pedy. As far as I can tell the guy was on
holiday in Aus mapped Coober Pedy then traveled on through Marree
referenced is for Coober Pedy. As far as I can tell the guy was on
holiday in Aus mapped Coober Pedy then traveled on through Marree adding
the pub as he went.
The Coober Pedy ones look suspect as well.
If you compare the Golf Cource (their spelling) with the mentioned
commercial maps then
Welcome to talk-au
I don't subscribe to the newbies list, so have no idea who is preaching what
on that list.
Thanks for letting us know here what you did, so that we can discuss and
provide our point of view.
Aussies of course revel in being different
:)
Sarcasm switch firmly on.
--
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Does not show up here. I see only one name Campbell Primary School.
Cyclemap and Osmarender show both names at maximum zoom.
Often the node name is rendered on top of the way name, so you only
see one. This depends
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:16:35 +1000
Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
URL?
http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/18/239684/158567.png
Is your browser caching old tiles?
No.
On 31 August 2010 19:16, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
URL?
http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/18/239684/158567.png
I was after the perm link
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:15:12 +1000
Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI. As per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM-object
I've removed a whole bunch of nodes where the same feature was mapped
out as a way. I made sure not to loose any tags in
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:15:12 +1000
Do you really think this was a good idea before discussing it on the list?
I did ask on the newbies list before about what to do here, I was told
that deleting the nodes
I had thought the latter was the standard? I also ask because
technically there's a conflict with the power:* proposals, one of
which was power:source=*.
JS got it wrong ;)
Don't know for sure but I've been changing them to source:maxspeed as per here:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:33:32 +1000
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Don't know for sure but I've been changing them to source:maxspeed as per
here:
Cool, surely they could be changed en masse though
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:23:15 -0700
Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com wrote:
Is there any recommended way to deal with streets with no names? I don't
mean streets that have a name and we just haven't added that to OSM yet. I
mean, how do we deal with streets that really don't have a name.
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:10 +0200
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
2010/7/31 Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
4) Change it in every map renderer / router / other software that is out
there - hundreds (or already even
Work out why it doesn't appear (5 min - your patch is actually very
slightly wrong btw, can you spot your mistake?)
Spotted my friday afternoon coding did you. Glad to see someones on the ball!!
However the above is just for fun - lets replace my original statement
with 'a lot of time' and
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:06:14 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2010 16:51, Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net wrote:
Provided the program is maintained. People may use programs not
maintained any more or they may be not able to upgrade or they wouldn't
know they
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
