Fixing a note yesterday arvo to add a cafe in Perth
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118044124#map=19/-31.90414/115.86993=N,
but when I moused over the next house just to check the street number, it
had a Fix-Me on it, saying "21".
Thinking that may be a street address, despite being next
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 18:25, Ewen Hill wrote:
>A lot of these notes are anonymous and therefore reminders will go into
> the ether. A significant proportion more are businesses via a third party
> app or two, once again, the chances of a response is slim which leaves
> travellers who flag
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 15:09, Stéphane Guillou via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I agree one should be cautious with closing notes
>
But where do we draw the line?
When you look at the oldest remaining notes, there are a couple there from
6 years ago, that were raised by an
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 16:16, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> an active mapper
I've actually just raised a suggestion in Github that the system may be
able to be modified to send reminders that your notes are still active "6"
months after you raised them:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 16:16, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> So it comes down to the question of what is the point of keeping:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2440403
>
> or
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2079710
>
> open?
Thanks for mentioning those couple, Andrew, as I seem to be in
the Oceania discord channel
> and I've noticed myself, so wanted to raise it here.
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 15:46, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 10:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As
the amenity had regular opening
> hours.
>
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2022, 09:55 Graeme Fitzpatrick,
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everybody!
>>
>> The closest to here is an actual hut rather than a van, but yes, it only
>> operates on long weekends, the first & last weekend
t;
> > On Sat, 26 Feb 2022, at 12:34 PM, Dian Ågesson wrote:
> >> Perhaps a simple food=yes on highway=rest_area?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2022-02-26 11:52, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just spo
Just spotted one of these on a Note.
Do we map them at all, & if so how?
Cafe perhaps, possibly together with rest-area?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Also just spotted this note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3063323
I've asked them for further details so we'll see what they say?
They have just added the track details to the track they were using, & to
be honest, you'd wonder why you'd be driving along there not knowing what
was at the
Have just spotted a note in Brisbane CBD where someone has queried whether
the road grid should mainly be tagged as secondary roads?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban_areas
They are all well & truly busy, but does that count as secondary?
Guidelines don't
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 13:02, Ewen Hill wrote:
>
> Any thoughts?
>
Giving it back to "the Organisation" responsible, telling them that's not
acceptable & asking them to fix it?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Yep, great plan.
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 05:28, wrote:
> Hi all
> Can I suggest the following
>
> 1 get community support from talk au for this process
> 2 Contact Aaron and get his agreement
> 3 Thorsten rolls back the wiki to an agreed state
> 4 Dian tidys up the wiki
> 5
Can't see it being an issue?
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 22:30, tabjsina wrote:
> So all of Australia with the exception of Victoria is now fixed to use
> capitalized state abbreviations. As mentioned before, Victoria was the
> state that had a much closer (though still not entirely
Nice idea, thanks Dian!
I've thought the same thing myself a few times but it's all too hard!
I also think that a number of things there, especially with roads, are
exactly teh same as the main wiki, so they shouldn't really need to be
mentioned specially?
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 17:30, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> DCS Topo Legend
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mholling/nswtopo-legends/master/nsw.png
Personally, I think the dry-lake proposal has a lot going for it - maybe we
should just start using it? A comment on it's talk page
& fixed! :-)
Thanks again
Graeme
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 14:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Thanks everybody!
>
> Noted to sort out a bit later :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 14:02, Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
>
>> So
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 10:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> As I write this, there are now 3543
>
Sorry if I'm boring any of you? :-), but thought I'd update this to mention
that after another 11 days, we are now at 2460!
& please check out the graph :-) - I'm waiting eagerly
-
>> *From:* Mark Rattigan
>> *Sent:* Monday, 21 February 2022 1:16 PM
>> *To:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org ; Graeme
>> Fitzpatrick
>> *Subject:* Re: Strange Street type (Pltn)
>>
>> My guess would be Plantation, given the pine forests in the area.
>>
Thanks mate! :-)
Graeme
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 11:58, Luke Stewart
wrote:
> I've added this signal based on imagery, as well as footage from a
> third-party YouTube channel where we have been given explicit permission to
> use the footage for mapping.
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 12:42, Luke
Another question re Notes!
On https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1688984#map=19/-33.93526/116.02726,
the OP commented "Southampton Pltn".
I asked what that meant & they said it was what was on the sign‽
https://postimg.cc/TpwrMCRZ
Any thoughts on Pltn?
The only thing I can think of could be
n Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 08:51, stevea wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2022, at 2:41 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 18:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some of ours, such as the India Pacific, are tourist only,
> >
> > I thought
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 18:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some of ours, such as the India Pacific, are tourist only,
I thought the IP also delivered some freight / supplies to the "towns"
(alright - flyspecks!) across the Nullabor?
Would that change anything at all?
Thanks
I'd possibly be able to help, Mike?
My laptop is sometimes a bit laggy & slow in (my very few!) online meetings
though, so that may cause issues?
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 12:43, Michael Collinson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there anyone who could help me co-host a Young Engineers
& after being reminded about it, I should have added my usual disclaimer
that the G photos are only for illustration purposes, they were not used in
any way for mapping!
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 09:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> This discussion started in response to so
This discussion started in response to something that I mapped.
I was clearing a note / Inspector issue nearby & wondered why this street
appeared differently on the map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216566993
Had a look & it was tagged as a service-alley which just didn't seem right,
but
Just working on fixing some tagging I did a while back on NSW Fire Stations
(I tagged the buildings as building=fire_station, but then obviously hit
"Q" to square them, because they're shown as =fire_stationq :-()
The fire-station tag is wanting to do an auto upgrade to include the
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 14:08, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> I am happy to send an email to DWG with an overview of concerns.
I'd hoped somebody may have read this thread by now?
> Maybe other folks can gather a listing of any desired changesets for
> reversion and if all or just some wiki edits should
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 09:55, Sam Wilson wrote:
>
> The other thing that occurs to me about this discussion is that aaronsta
> is not actually subscribed to this list — does anyone know? I might
> leave a comment on the changeset instead...
>
Not having a go at you blokes interested in the bike
Come back up to the GC to work on tidying up the light rail tracks etc,
which I noticed recently were a mess.
Started & have immediately hit trouble as the first couple of station
platforms have been tied to the tracks eg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/-28.03500/153.43104
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 18:41, stevea wrote:
>
> “Saucy wenches” and all.
But we don't have a tag for them, do we? :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
No argument at all from me!
Just thinking of possible options :-)
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 11:55, Dian Ågesson wrote:
> A further thought,
>
> Tagging permissions that open the road in certain times, rather than close
> them, could also lead to better outcomes with less sophisticated routing
>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 13:48, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Changing subject from tracks for a minute :-), I was reading the weekly
> Newsletter yesterday & spotted this article
> https://www-openstreetmap-org.translate.goog/user/AngocA/diary/398423?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 08:25, wrote:
>
> The challenge with specifying months is the "wet"/"dry" season is it is
> not always fixed.
>
True, but if we modify Brendan's suggestion a bit to:
vehicle:conditional=no @ Dec-Apr ("Road is generally impassable during the
wet season - seek local
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 22:35, OpenStreetMap Wiki <
w...@noreply.openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> The OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been
> changed on 9 February 2022 by Aaronsta, see
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines for
> the current
Thanks, fellas! It's not an utterly stupid idea then!
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 14:46, Brendan Barnes wrote:
>
> If a road has definitive closure dates we might be able to utilise
> opening_hours. I tried to start something similar on Victorian Alps
> seasonal road closures, for example
>
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 14:02, Brendan Barnes wrote:
> Some jurisdictions do publish live traffic updates in GeoJSON, examples:
>
>- https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/live-traffic-hazards
>-
>
>
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 13:35, Michael Collinson wrote:
> We have a reasonable if not perfect tagging system for a router to assess
> (and make assumptions) about the quality of a road for various types of
> vehicle in BEST CASE conditions. motorway versus track, tracktype, asphalt
> versus
Reading this article earlier:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-08/google-maps-to-fix-routes-trapped-travellers-queensland/100805884
So what's the best way to avoid the same issues?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 16:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale .. even
> if you don't know what awtgs is.
>
Fair comment.
> Routes are a different problem while the worst one could be included
> .. what happens
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick
> one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.
>
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 22:18, Michael Collinson wrote:
> in Ireland a "descriptive" address "The blue house called Bob, on the
> other side of the stream in the village of Inverkeith" is also formally
> acceptable - this is rare globally though.
>
Way back in Telecom days, so ~ early 80s, I
I've always listed the name of units & so on just as name=*.
Thanks
Graeme
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 16:14, Mat Attlee wrote:
> Whilst I was out surveying today I stumbled upon a building that had a
> street number but also a house name, as just above the entrance and door
> number it said
Thanks, both!
Yep, get's very messy very quickly :-(
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 19:32, wrote:
> I assume these National parks where different rules are in effect have a
> boundary relation.
>
>
>
> In which case it would be possible to either:
>
>
>
> a) tag a def: directly on that boundary relation with the rules that apply
> or (maybe better in this
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 12:16, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> Assuming the suburb / locality boundaries have been mapped (which they
> should not be Australia wide from an import), then data consumers can infer
> the rest of the attributes. Check out Nominatim,
>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 22:18, Kim Oldfield via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> update a short section of road there with access=no.
>
=no or =private, because work crews can still drive in there to do repairs?
> This achieves the main objective of stopping OSM from routing along
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 17:24, Phil Wyatt wrote:
>
>
> So reading from that chart and in regard to my query about ‘tracks that
> are exclusively for foot traffic’ you would say it can ONLY be a footway?
>
By that list, yes?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 16:54, wrote:
> As far as I’m concerned, footway, cycleway, path(, and bridleway) are all
> essentially the same thing, a non-motor_vehicle path, just with different
> implied default access restrictions.
>
>
>
> We should probably have a discussion about how appropriate
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 11:03, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> some criteria where a footway ends and path commences
>
As I mentioned last week, I've started using path for just about everything
just to get away from adding foot=yes to bike paths & bike=yes to footpaths
:-)
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 14:18, tabjsina wrote:
>
> Thanks all - let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions
>
Probably easiest, & less messy, to set several up, one for each state -
it'd be OK to include ACT in NSW, or Tas in Vic Oops! : TAS in VIC :-)
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Threads have crossed :-(, but as per their instructions that I mentioned
> in the other post, the track overall is tagged to the highest
> classification, so per the example they give:
>
> Example: Wineg
Sorry, that wasn't supposed to send! :-(
Back in a moment!
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:20, Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
>
>>
>> 2. Does the AWTGS system
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 13:20, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> 2. Does the AWTGS system apply more to routes than way segments? For
> example a longer route loop might have a higher grade than a shorter loop
> even if they overlap for parts. Would you then only apply AWTGS on a
>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 11:05, wrote:
>
>
> I think we should just stick with the AWTGS as it stands. It seems to be
> gaining widespread government support, and even if it is not perfect, it
> seems like a standard that is going to stay with us.
>
So, working on this idea, looking at
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 12:16, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> Check out Nominatim,
> https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N=6496603926=place
> it shows the inherited attributes like suburb, postcode, state.
>
& by the look at it, in built-up areas at least, it will even ID the
et the bounce.
>
>
>
> So the link between the mailing list and gmane needs fixing, a job for the
> administrator of all the openstreetmap.org lists
>
>
>
> I’ll have a poke and raise the issue with someone.
>
>
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *Graeme Fitzp
Just replied to the "Consistent addr:state format" thread as a reply all,
but got an undelivered message bounce back to me.
Says that message was sent to
OSM-Au & OSM-Au
, but
public.gmane.org couldn't be found.
The response was:
DNS Error: 4023212 DNS type 'mx' lookup of public.gmane.org
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 23:17, tabjsina wrote:
> It looks like Qld makes up ~3700 address states and QLD is at 15000
> ("Queensland" is ~1000 as a comparison).
>
> I'm thinking I'll make an adjustment in the Queensland code to skip
> cases that are "Qld", but otherwise (For complete errors, and
>
Point.
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 15:53, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Was that a point or an area Graeme?
>
>
>
> *From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick
> *Sent:* Sunday, 30 January 2022 4:49 PM
> *To:* Phil Wyatt
> *Cc:* OSM-Au
> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Water tanks as bu
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 15:47, Adam Horan wrote:
>
> I've done, this which gives you a visual indication of the size of the
> tank: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47785839
>
Something that size may be better as a reservoir?
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 15:15, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> That’s the standard tagging for a water tank in ID editor.
>
I've just tried it using the iD "water tank" preset & it only put in:
content=water + man_made=storage_tank?
> There will be 1,000’s of them across the globe I suspect
>
:-(
Just working on notes & one of them took me here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-35.73637/137.59784
Started wondering what the little "reservoirs" were along the beach?, then
noticed that the same mapper who did them, has also tagged all the
rain-water tanks around the houses as
G'day Justin & welcome!
Asking any question that you've got is quite definitely the best way of
doing things - thanks!
I agree fully about the acronyms rather than spelling the name in full,
with the exception that I personally use Qld rather than QLD.
If I was down there, I'd probably also use
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 08:50, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> I remember seeing mention in the Tagging list a little while back re a new
> way of mapping highways in Japan.
>
Here it is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_JapanTagging/RoadTypes/motorroad
Yes, it was rej
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 at 18:24, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.
I agree that for the average punter/tourist the Australian Walking Track
> Classification is the ‘simplest to understand in plain language’. Now can
> we benchmark that against the sac_scale?
>
Do we need to?
I
Just doing some looking & spotted:
https://qorf-media.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/11153757/TrackGradingSystem_UserGuide.pdf
which includes
Glossary
AS 2156.1-2001 Walking Tracks - Classification and Signage
The Australian Walking Track Grading System benchmarks to
On this subject, just working through Notes & found this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=15/-36.0545/146.8886 (you'll have to
turn Notes on to see it!), which reads:
*" Private Property. The following are not public tracks/trails. TV Track,
Rons Trail, Kuhne Trail, part of Gorge
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 at 09:34, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> It certainly differs greatly in metropolitan areas – try using ‘Greater
> Hobart’ as the search criteria. Seems like most folks change to path if it
> in a ‘park’ of some sort and use ‘footway’ in the streets
>
I must admit to having recently
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 21:35, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Overpass query for Cradle Mountain National Park
It all just appears to show orange path, with no red footway?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
ding to come back and fix a few of his!
>
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
>
>
> *From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 January 2022 2:48 PM
> *To:* OSM-Au
> *Subject:* [talk-au] OSM Notes
>
>
>
> Changing subject from tracks for a minute :-), I was reading
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 18:01, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> Obviously river conditions change, but I think it's useful to tag what's
> usually the case:
>
> 1. creek crossing where generall the water level is so low that you won't
> have water ingress in your shoes
> 2. creek crossing where your body
Changing subject from tracks for a minute :-), I was reading the weekly
Newsletter yesterday & spotted this article
https://www-openstreetmap-org.translate.goog/user/AngocA/diary/398423?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=EN&_x_tr_hl=en-GB,
concerning clearing up all the outstanding OSM Notes in Colombia.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 19:39, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> If I were to design the ideal tag for Australia, it would be something
> like:
>
> technicality=0-3
>
> 0. Well formed, even surface (could almost walk it blindfolded).
> 1. Uneven surface, trip hazards from rocks, tree roots etc.
> 2. Large
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 11:26, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
> If the tracks were kept in OSM, but tagged appropriately so as not to
> appear in the rendering,
& this is the big thing. Rendering needs to show that this track shouldn't
be used. Maybe access=no gets a big red X across each entrance to say
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 21:23, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I would rather they be left in the OSM and tagged in a different way for
>> various reasons
>
>
>
>> but I expect we have little choice but to accept the NPWS decision.
>>
>
> Quite the opposite, NPWS has little choice but to accept the
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 21:59, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> Inspired by the US trails group work, I thought maybe we can attempt
> something localised for Australia.
>
Great idea!
> I started sketching something out at
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia/Walking_Tracks. If anyone
>
I would have thought that may have been better being sent to DWG for
action, rather than a bloke from NPWS signing up an account to just go in &
delete stuff?
Andrew?
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 15:12, nwastra nwastra wrote:
> For info and with some regard to recent discussion of
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 20:18, Peter Hardy
wrote:
>
> Is this the right approach for doing this?
>
G'day Peter & welcome!
Certainly the way I do it, & it seems to work!
eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422427220#map=19/-28.08664/153.42501
Although OSM doesn't render the number, Osmand, at
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:31, Sam Wilson wrote:
> And mainly I'm just wondering: how much Australia-related discussion is
> happening elsewhere other than this list?
>
I'm curious about that as well?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 18:20, wrote:
> Warin,
>
>
>
> nobody says that the tagging isn’t correct for cases where the bus_stop
> node is the only thing there is.
>
>
>
> But please look at:
>
>
>
>
> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/471231032645910529/931073576893825064/unknown.png
>
>
>
>
Response from one of the blokes on MySwag (who much prefers quiet deserted
gravel over busy bitumen roads! :-)):
*Brilliant !Shall explore that one further.I did similar across Tas, from
St Helens to Campania over several days which was fun.I'm looking at maps
and planning a trip from the head
Amazing, thanks Ian! :-)
Just posted it up on MySwag (http://www.myswag.org/index.php) so we'll see
what the interest is there!
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 14:59, Little Maps wrote:
> Hi folks, for everyone interested in OpenStreetMap's fantastic road data…
> I've just posted a
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 10:53, stevea wrote:
>
> Graeme makes a request, Steve does what he can (Warin and Steve have an
> on-list and off-list dialog), Steve leaves alone what he's not sure about
> in the relation, Graeme confirms that "something right" happened and that
> he agrees with Steve
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 20:03, Ewen Hill wrote:
> Hi Graeme and happy new year,
>How much can you datamine from a suburb:left , suburb:right ? I would
> suggest suburb polygons and street names only which would cover all
> eventualities and allow for the change in the suburb area without
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 at 16:51, stevea wrote:
> But it is a bit better than it was five minutes ago.
>
& has now disappeared from Inspector, so you obviously did something right
:-)
I'll also leave the bus route relation to somebody who knows what they're
doing!
Thanks
Graeme
Would left / right help at all?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right#Left_and_right
Contemplating something like:
addr:name=Sandgate Road + addr:suburb:left=Clayfield +
addr:suburb:right=Albion
Thanks
Graeme
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 13:52, Andrew Davidson
hundreds,
> maybe thousands of routes (bus, bike, road, rail…) but as I’m a
> right-hand-drive Yank and don’t know the route or local area, I defer to
> others to tidy this up to perfection. But it is a bit better than it was
> five minutes ago.
>
> SteveA
>
> > On Jan 2, 2
Been looking at OSM Inspector & it is showing an error on a near-by street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id=791590032#map=18/-28.08609/153.42409
The error is being reported as a "Way without tags".
I can see a line there, which appears to be a duplicate of Christine Ave?,
but no
Happy New Year!
Just noticed mention of this in the weekly Newsletter:
https://www.openstreetmap.us/2021/12/osmus-trails-working-group
Looks like something that we should be following with interest?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Noticed a week or so ago that one of the major arterial roads nearby has
been changed from highway=primary to highway=trunk, which doesn't seem
quite right, especially as it has bike lanes on each side for most of it's
length, & one of the defaults for trunk is no bikes.
Thanks again everybody for your thoughts, & apologies if the subject is
boring to you!
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 08:25, stevea wrote:
Agree entirely, Steve, that it's a hard one, that, same as many others,
probably has no answer?
However, I do love:
> (Maybe I am a secret vexillologist and
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 06:27, stevea wrote:
>
> My goodness, there are hundreds of them!
>
Thought there would have been!
Do you know if many have been mapped, & if so, as what?
I can see that most of those listed are for towns or villages, which would
be =municipal, but how about the
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 18:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are quite a few Australian flags ... some not 'official'.
>
> I was aware of this 'one', but not that it is the only flag in the world
> for a river?
>
> http://www.murrayriver.com.au/about-the-murray/murray-river-flag/
>
i editors out there?
>
>
>
> Cheers - Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 December 2021 1:53 PM
> *To:* Andrew Davidson ; OSM-Au <
> talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] First Nations flags?
>
>
>
l, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is mor
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 08:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> I'll update the Oz Guidelines to include this info.
>
& done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Australian_Flags
Having troubles with the example images of the Aboriginal & Torres Stra
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 17:23, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> flag:name=Australian Aboriginal
> flag:wikidata=Q1285625
>
> flag:name=Torres Strait Islander
> flag:wikidata=Q462621
>
Thanks for that info, Andrew.
& after a bit more searching last night, it turns out that they have both
been
Just doing some mapping & spotted a group of flagpoles outside the building.
First flag is Australian, which is fine, but the next two are the
Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander flags.
What do we call them?
flag:type wiki says choices are basically national ( the main civil flag of
a nation)
Council is the owner of the intellectual property rights, including
> copyright, in the information and data provided through TRC's Online
> Mapping, with the exception of licensed data. These conditions of use do
> not confer on the user of TRC's Online Mapping any rights of ownership in
>
201 - 300 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
