Just out of curiosity, were these all mapped with the new version of the
RapiD OSM editor https://mapwith.ai/rapid-esri?
On 16/09/2020 08:18, Gareth L wrote:
Morning Mateusz,
You’re right, it’s not encountered in edit mode.
4:
1. “en-GB en”
2. “en-GB”
3. System Locale:
rather than generic improvement of feature
alignment.
Regards,
Jerry
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 10:05, Nick <mailto:n...@foresters.org>> wrote:
I have been looking at what is recorded under this tag in my area.
I see
that there aren't that many and those that are on OS
0 at 15:13, Nick <mailto:n...@foresters.org>> wrote:
My thinking was that most people surveying would not use accurate
and precise systems such as differential GPS and/or RTK. So if
these systems were used to accurately and precisely locate
distinct local markers (i.e. trig
I have been looking at what is recorded under this tag in my area. I see
that there aren't that many and those that are on OSM refer to trig
points (see also http://trigpointing.uk/). My thinking is that if these
are accurate and precisely marked on OSM then perhaps they could be used
for
The update on the FOIA request
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lists_of_historic_and_parent_upr
is worth a read!! Makes you wonder at the value of releasing open data
that has limited value to the public?
On 01/08/2020 20:24, Nick wrote:
As a follow up, Robert Whittaker also
That is a good point and if the councils agree to publish under OGL,
that would be ideal. Perhaps need to consider what data should be
requested as a standard submission? For example, apart from the UPRN
related data (i.e. whether parent/child, historic, provisional) the
request could perhaps
Could the data be included in https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ ?
On 21/07/2020 22:42, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-07-21 22:54, Mark Goodge wrote:
It's the errors which are more of a problem, because it's generally
better not to map something than to map it wrongly.
This is a difficult point.
from the commercial value, this is unlikely to
be published as apparently this might be misleading due to the
randomness of the data and likely to be out of date quickly.
So much for the potential for collaboration with the various authorities.
On 06/07/2020 15:10, Nick wrote:
Hi Jez
To
for the NHLE heritage listings? Taking this further, should
the preset also have a drop down for Listed Building listed_status?
On 23/07/2020 15:12, Nick wrote:
Out of interest, I note that in England the 'List Entry Number'
appears to be simply numeric, which does not appear to give
ack of trust
On 01/08/2020 21:19, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 01/08/2020 20:24, Nick wrote:
As a follow up, Robert Whittaker also submitted an FOI asking for
"... a list of all UPRNs that are classified as 'historic', and a
separate list of all those classified as a 'parent' ". the
I have no problem with licencing but the UPRN and related data is
managed by Authority custodians - do they not retain ownership of that data?
If the authorities sell it to OS, then should this be raised with The Rt
Hon Alok Sharma MP (he owns 100% of the shares of OS)?
N.B. there are some
Hi Jez
You can limit the number of requests to a specific URL (or set of URLs)
by IP address - so polling "every available UPRN" would not be an issue
(e.g. can limit the number of requests from a given IP over a given time
period).
Cheers
Nick
On 02/08/2020 11:58, Jez Nicho
UPRNs are applied to street records (e.g. 320276457 is a street record
in Fife, I am sure there are many more).
Perhaps all these non-addressable UPRNs should be identified as part of
the open data?
Related to this is the FOI request that Robert Whittaker made re "list
of all UPRNs that are
Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is
not adopted)
On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish. UPRNs
that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so if we
could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs, it would
help users identify relevant ones
On 13/08/2020 14:08, Nick wrote:
Lester makes
:30, Nick wrote:
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish.
UPRNs that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so
if we could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs,
it would help users identify relevant ones
How are you identifying
he concept you
can use Python (a friend has done some preliminary work) or similar.
This is not elegant but is perhaps a first step in enabling a whole lot
of development?
Cheers
Nick
On 02/07/2020 18:38, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for producing that map.
I was ab
Hi Mike
I tend to agree in terms of consistency. Looking at the results for
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=usrn - the key 'ref:usrn'
dominates so to me makes sense to use 'key:uprn'. Searching on UPRN
reveals the lack of clarity.
Cheers
Nick
On 03/07/2020 17:47, Mike Baggaley
I went for the crude approach as my computer is not that powerful, so I
split the CSV into chunks and imported batches into QGIS with
county/postcode boundaries as my interest is trying to understand how
the UPRNs have been batched. Not elegant but means that I now can focus
on our area and
sts
of anomalies to demonstrate this to government.
On 06/07/2020 12:09, Nick wrote:
I went for the crude approach as my computer is not that powerful, so
I split the CSV into chunks and imported batches into QGIS with
county/postcode boundaries as my interest is trying to understand how
the UPRNs h
). That
allowed me to have details, which in this instance I then checked
property sites (e.g. ESPC) to verify the 'likely' error.
If you want more details of the example, let me know and I can put a bit
more detail together.
Cheers
Nick
On 06/07/2020 12:34, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Sorry, i mean
Hi Mark
Brilliant comment - "because the people who are most likely to spot
errors - members of the general public with local knowledge - tend not
to have easy access to the data". Now we need the evidence (errors)
collated centrally (OSM?).
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
Apologies
Not sure if this is of help - in Scotland there is this link
https://www.historicenvironment.scot/advice-and-support/listing-scheduling-and-designations/scheduled-monuments/types-of-scheduled-monument/
which translates to 'Category' (e.g. Roman: camp) in the gis data set.
On 15/07/2020 10:18,
Just a thought, is there any value aligning with Wikidata ('heritage
designation') https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1435 or at least
have links?
On 15/07/2020 11:16, Brian Prangle wrote:
I use listed_status =Scheduled Monument
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 10:19 Tony OSM,
Hi Mark
I was wondering in the future if street names etc. could be derived from
Mapillary (attribution source=Mapillary) where images exist?
Cheers
Nick
On 04/07/2020 12:02, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 04/07/2020 06:16, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
So, a few months ago I stumbled upon
address data - I do that by also checking the Roayl Mail address finder.
Perhaps you can shed some light on the tangle of relevant licensing?
Cheers
Nick
On 03/07/2020 10:07, Russ Garrett wrote:
Just to emphasise that the output from your script is not suitable for
use in OSM - the osg.scot
if in the future, if calling for emergency
services people will be asked to give their UPRN.
I actually think that at the root of the problem is the "philosophy of
what is an address" so that I know how I can add address data to OSM - I
am happy to acknowledge the source on OSM.
Ch
Hi Lester
I think there needs to be some thought as to the "proper channel to feed
corrections to the 'data officer' responsible". It took me months to get
a 'data officer' to correct the location of a single UPRN, so my thought
is that this needs to be a 'public' (open) channel that shows a)
work well for me but happy to fit in with others.
Cheers
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
certainly
help land managers and users. Imagine if this was in place for Covid
restrictions.
Nick
On 11/07/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Is there anyone here who is competent to write some kind of summary
guidance on the wiki? Ideally one reflective of the approximate
consensus? It would be super helpful
'volunteers', OS
and other agencies strikes me as a possible win-win?.. but I suppose
that is me going 'a step too far'
On 23/07/2020 10:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
Jul 23, 2020, 11:49 by for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
On 23/07/2020 10:12, Nick wrote:
Do we actually
My apologies, I have just realised this discussion only relates to
english tags.
Is it worth discussing in tandem what happens in other parts of GB
(separate thread)? for example, in Scotland the "Garden & Designed
Landscape" designation don't have individual grades (category) but are
easily. So the purpose here may need
to be different (e.g. more detailed mapping, link to other local data)?
Do we actually know what the general public use OSM for?
On 22/07/2020 22:13, Dave Love wrote:
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:29 +0100, Nick wrote:
Dear all
I have been mapping a few properties
Out of interest, I note that in England the 'List Entry Number' appears
to be simply numeric, which does not appear to give an indication of the
type of designation. Perhaps I have not picked that up correctly.
N.B. in Scotland, designations have a code + numeric listing e.g. HMPA2
(which is
listed_status:website - URL seems to have changed from
http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1409803 to
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1409803
On 16/07/2020 10:51, SK53 wrote:
It looks that for listed gardens we've used a combination of
elements.
Tony
On 16/07/2020 13:42, Nick wrote:
listed_status:website - URL seems to have changed from
http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1409803 to
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1409803
On 16/07/2020 10:51, SK53 wrote:
It looks
perceive as the purpose
of mapping (hope I have not opened a can of worms).
Any thoughts/suggestions gratefully received
Nick
P.S. I am aware of some documentation e.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
Hi Lester
Rob has suggested a matching USRN tag
You make a good point regarding upper and lower case. Perhaps the tag
should be ref:GB:UPRN in line with normal convention of referring to
UPRN in upper case?
Nick
On 21/07/2020 10:34, Lester Caine wrote:
On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson
if the quality is good, that
people might use OSM as the map to go to e.g. for Planning applications?
Cheers
Nick
On 22/07/2020 13:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
Jul 20, 2020, 12:29 by n...@foresters.org:
Dear all
I have been mapping a few properties using Bing maps with local
Hi Tony
I had contacted one of the authors but also did wonder if it was better
to make my own - thank you so much for sharing your version :-)
Cheers
Nick
On 30/07/2020 15:36, Tony OSM wrote:
Hi
I did know of that plug-in so i created my own
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/tagging-preset
Save the file as an XML file on your computer or wherever then in JOSM:
Edit>Preferences>Map Display>Tagging presets - then click the + sign and
add the file.
On 30/07/2020 16:08, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 15:36, Tony OSM wrote:
I did know of that plug-in so i created my
For this particular example it is clearly complex as it was shown as a
'permissive' footpath (other non vehicular access was along the
designated bridleway). As this is in England and given that the driveway
seems to have just been changed to 'designated', I assume the change
made to the map
Would changing this to Tag:highway=bridleway be a starting point?
On 12/12/2020 13:03, Nick wrote:
For this particular example it is clearly complex as it was shown as a
'permissive' footpath (other non vehicular access was along the
designated bridleway). As this is in England and given
Hi Martin
I had to check the Council GIS - so the designation is Bridleway.
Because of the complexity, if this was tagged something like
'Bridleway=Yes' and get that displayed on maps of footpaths, surely that
would solve the problem?
Nick
On 12/12/2020 13:41, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 12/12
ure type = Bridleway?
Cheers
Nick
On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 12/12/2020 13:59, Nick wrote:
I had to check the Council GIS - so the designation is Bridleway.
Because of the complexity, if this was tagged something like
'Bridleway=Yes' and get that displayed on maps of footpaths
to find. To my mind this is where more options from the
worldwide map fail to deliver and is a bigger issue that can be resolved
by understanding the 'customer' journey better?
On 13/12/2020 10:28, Nick Allen wrote:
Hi,
I tend to think of tagging more in terms of 'who will use this?' I
know my
Totally agree that openstreetmap.org isn't supposed to be a "general
public" map destination but without knowing user journeys, I assume that
is where most people land.
Options could be that openstreetmap.org provide alternative links based
on locality and/or develop robust (N.B. tiles from
I will throw something in the pot, apart from using the "Cycle map"
solution what do people think of Overlapping ways i.e. one is a road and
a duplicate is a bridleway? Not elegant and something I would not
normally suggest but...
On 13/12/2020 13:00, Martin Wynne wrote:
As the OP on this,
The 'shell' of the building is not normally addressable so it would not
have a postcode allocated. I guess this has occured as postcode areas
normally would cover up to 100 properties. I note that the response in
the discussion seems to have come from a councillor at Peterborough City
Council
I work in George Road and as such go past every weekday.
Sorry, I thought the new development had been done - I'll pop out and get
some traces later in the week and get the map updated.
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Hi All,
Just updating my local area and want to add a couple of Parcel Depots, one
for the Royal Mail, and one for TNT.
The Royal Mail one is *not* amenity=post_office as it does not accept
parcels/letters for onward delivery, only collection of undeliverables.
The TNT one will send/receive
done I'll put up a list
of the remaining gaps on the Southampton wiki page so that the rest can be
cleared up quite quickly.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
/South_East_Tip
--
Nick Black
http://www.blacksworld.net
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
, coastlines and the sea are now visible. :-)
Thirdly, I've made a few fixes so that place name labels no longer get cut off
on the edge of tiles.
Thanks to Artem for helping out with many aspects of this.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
Hello Andy,
Nick,
It all looks very nice.
It's also pointed out obvious errors in the location of photographs by
contributors to Geograph. In my view it rather defeats the object of that
project if contributors don't get the location of their photos right,
however all would not be lost of course
Hello Etienne,
OK. Actually I'll probably be coming up again on next Tuesday evening
(22nd) to meet up with Steve to give the GPS units back, so if you're
available then that's another possibility.
nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
tags.
It isn't fully working right now as the OSM server is giving 500 errors when
you upload a node.
Only tested on Firefox.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
On Thursday 17 May 2007 19:05, you wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 17 May 2007, at 10:47, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hello everyone,
By ditching SVG and using an alternative approach, the online point of
interest editor that I mentioned yesterday is now a good deal more
usable and
faster - so
Hello Shaun,
On 17 May 2007, at 21:25, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
[..]
Hello Shaun,
Hi Nick,
The only thing that is appearing is:
21:11: [JavaScript Error: div has no properties {file: http://
www.openlayers.org/dev/lib/OpenLayers/Map.js line: 165}]
I get that as well. Don't know
on an existing POI, you can edit it.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
select
hamlet for the type, the full tags drop down box does not immediately
refresh. The tags *are* successfully added though.
No doubt some mysterious Windows idiosyncracy.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
in this.tags) {
if (k != 'created_by' k != 'source' k != 'note'
!(k=='class' this.tags[k]=='node')) {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
},
Nick
assumption that the grid square TQ (and others north
of it) were the easternmost grid squares covering the UK. A glance at the map
reveals this not to be the case - the far east projects into the next one
over. This is corrected now.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing
Hi folks
Does anyone have this file please? The download from SlowRider's page on the
wiki isn't there any more.
Thanks
Nick
PS Anyone else in East Anglia?
Nick Folwell
*: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H*: 01440 706768
M*: 07767 374 925
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: nickfolwell
Hello David,
Can you make the weekend of September 22nd/23rd for the Isle of Wight
footpaths mapping we talked about at SOTM? If so I'll try and mention it to a
few people here.
One other person expressed an interest by private email.
Nick
interested.
I realise that weekend clashes with the South West UK Mapping Party,
Typical - *two* potentially interesting mapping parties on the only weekend I
can't do this summer!!! :-( Oh well
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
On Friday 03 Aug 2007 15:45, you wrote:
On 8/3/07, Nick Whitelegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick comment on footpath tagging. Looking at Freemap the majority
of footpaths and bridleways are coming up in magenta (=permissive) rather
than red (=right of way). If you can verify
://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
have fun,
SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.asklater.com/steve/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Nick Black
anyone recommend a friend
who does this sort of thing. Any pointers appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Nick Black
http://www.blacksworld.net
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin
-versus-physical-description thing :-)
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
My first thought was that it must have been added by our resident
tunnel engineer, but apparently not!
The second edit was mine (i.e. I added the note) - so why hasn't my
username showed up?
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
- but it wasn't me.
TBH I was completely unaware they were building a tunnel, when I saw it on
OSM I assumed it was a bad track of the A3 or a mis-tagged footpath.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hi All
Is there anyone based in London who's able to collect two servers from
near Canary Wharf *this afternoon*?
They'll need to get to Nick Black eventually, but the important thing for
now is that they get collected today, otherwise they're going to have to
go in the bin :(
Is anyone able
.
After a bit of tweaking of the import script, it's now scheduled to run
every night. So in future, your updates to FTP should appear in npemaps
(and hence the openstreetmap searcher) the next day
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
--
Nick Black
http://www.blacksworld.net
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
be able to
take people there?
If not no worries, I can try and find somewhere in Petersfield.
BTW the others have signed up... do you have cars or are you arriving on
public transport?
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
(will look into the possibilities)
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
, Nick Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curry is 100% necessary. Show the southerners what a real naan bread
looks like.
On 9/7/07, tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ideally lat/longs for these places would be good.
Good idea, I'll add them to the wiki.
Also, edit the press release
Might have some ideas for Freemap anyhow :-)
OpenQuo, anyone? :-)
Nick
Steve Coast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/09/2007 15:10
To
Frank Tompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject
Re: [Talk-GB] FW: Quo
It's like Google My Maps, in a proprietary
Edited the subject to reflect what I actually mean.
On 9/19/07, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:40 PM 9/19/2007, Nick Black wrote:
My thinking here is that k='line' is generic/international and can
equally be applied to other rail networks. How does this sound?
Yes, 'line
There's a lot of confusion here. I'll think about this and make a
feature proposal, then look at planet and unify the tagging.
On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/19/07, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Black wrote:
On 9/19/07, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should be railway=subway of course, not railway=rail.
Not if the line isn't subterranean.
I think
Hello everyone,
If you are thinking of coming to the East Hants party at the weekend and need
a GPS unit PLEASE LET ME KNOW on:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BY TOMORROW (Friday) LUNCHTIME so that, if necessary, I can go over to Reigate
tomorrow to pick some up from Steve.
Thanks,
Nick
;
speedunits=mph?
Cheers
Nick
Nick Folwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Well I'm assuming the idea is to use this for route planning, but also for
warning when you exceed the speed limit (like TomTom does) - so being in the
local units would be preferred.
Nick Folwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
think
of an example now, but I'm sure there are some...)
Nick Folwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Williams
Sent: 21 September 2007 08:17
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] [Fwd: Re: Conflicting tagging
swathe of both road and footpath coverage stretching between London and
Bournemouth possibly realised.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Oct 14: Morning editing session (learn how to use JOSM) followed by
mapping
Will let you know more in due course.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Sun Oct 14: Morning editing session (learn how to use JOSM)
/me sniffs
Sorry - Potlatch too... Just finished a long JOSM session adding the
weekend's mapping so had it on the brain, also I'm not 100% sure whether
we'll have internet access.
Nick
Nick - you clash with Sheffield and all the units are booked to go
there so we need to sort something out?
Could we do half and half? Or even, say, just 6 units?
There will probably be quite a few newbies at Winchester so I think we
need at least 6, people can pair up or go in groups
Could we do half and half? Or even, say, just 6 units?
Sorry, make that 4, could probably get away with that.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
sign up now.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
for people to use, but please bring
along your own as there may be new people from the BCS attending. There's
also an OSM talk at Southampton Solent University tomorrow evening at
6.30pm - see the wiki for details.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
The nights are closing in and the weather's getting lousy...
Is it? :-)
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
/freemap/gpxtodb.php - GPX uploading interface
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Hey Nick,
its giving me an xml parsing error on both ff and opera
Hello Tim,
Not sure how that happened! It was working fine when I put it back up a
week or so ago. I think the error was there anyway but now I'm setting a
mime type of XML for some reason.
I'll look at it this evening.
Nick
--
Nick Black
http://www.blacksworld.net
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Looks like the South Downs Way has almost been completed, mapped continuously
from Winchester to Lewes - just the last 15 or 20 miles left to do.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman
be added. I feel I'm getting to the stage now where Freemap is a useful
resource but speed is the main stumbling block; it's not as snappy as the
main OSM renderers.
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
1 - 100 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
