---
Stuart Reynolds
traveline south east anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I absolutely agree that this has to be down to the users of the data to sort
out. Here at traveline south east, we have just started using OSM for our GIS
data and we map bus routes and route pedestrians on the GIS. We have had to
take on board all sorts of quirks - three different ways (so
Hi,
This is a spin off from the recent thread about imports, because I wanted to
specifically talk about NaPTAN imports.
Having briefly scanned the various wiki pages, I get the impression that the
NaPTAN data was imported, once, in 2009. What I can't see, or haven't found, is
any discussion
improved. Some working relationship with the council team who
maintain the data would help too.
Cheers, Chris,
osm user: chillly
On 31 July 2014 15:15:18 GMT+01:00, Stuart Reynolds
stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.ukmailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
wrote:
Hi,
This is a spin off from the recent
OK. Clearly I’m going to have to think on this for a bit longer. I think
looking at somewhere like Swanley is a good idea, and also at somewhere like
Derbyshire if the stops data hasn’t been imported there.
In terms of bus routes, we also compute the most likely route between stops,
and could
:51 PM
To: Stuart Reynolds
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NaPTAN (stop) import
On 1 August 2014 11:17, Stuart Reynolds
stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.ukmailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
wrote:
In terms of bus routes, we also compute the most likely route between stops,
and could use
PM
To: Oliver Jowett
Cc: Stuart Reynolds; Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NaPTAN (stop) import
I see it as being better to put the right hints into the OSM data and the
routing algorithm so that they can be automatically chosen from the TNDS data,
rather than having the data in OSM, which is hard
Hi
Here in Southend I have a number of boulevards - dual carriageways with large
central grassed/tree areas. In some cases there are quite clearly defined
crossing points, and often there will be fences down the middle of the road
(especially outside schools) to prevent people using anything
On 18/08/14 11:41, David Woolley wrote:
Considering the longer term problems:
1) There needs to be better guidance to routing software
developers on how to route when there are parallel
features accessible on foot;
Agreed. The things that give our routing engine problems are:
- dual
That's a very London-centric view of life. Numbers are not necessarily unique
locally once you get out into the sticks.
Stuart
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Aug 2014, at 14:58, David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk wrote:
On 23/08/14 14:50, Amaroussi-OSM wrote:
Maybe I could try “London
,
Stuart Reynolds
For traveline south east anglia
From: SK53 [mailto:sk53@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 September 2014 3:00 PM
To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] OSM on Traveline website
Over the weekend I made a fair bit of use of the traveline website for planning
journeys in the Greater
This is digressing somewhat into a discussion about NaPTAN but before I get
into that point, if I can just pick up on the comment about leaving things in
because it shows a history of what the data looked like. Sorry, but OSM IS a
dynamic data set and doesn't AFAIK have the facility to keep a
That should have been DfT in my last sentence. Curse autocorrect!
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Oct 2014, at 18:00, Stuart Reynolds
stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.ukmailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
wrote:
This is digressing somewhat into a discussion about NaPTAN but before I get
That's my view as someone who is closely involved with NaPTAN. I don't know
what official OSM policy is-I'm just saying what it ought to be
Regards
Stuart
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Oct 2014, at 18:20, David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk wrote:
On 05/10/14 17:58, Stuart Reynolds wrote
confused!
Many thanks
Stuart
---
Stuart Reynolds
For traveline south east anglia
email: stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
mob: 07788 106165
skype: stuartjreynolds
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
, and before I go and hassle the contractor I thought
I would check my understanding. I got the impression that access=no took
everything out.
Thanks.
Stuart
---
Stuart Reynolds
For traveline south east anglia
email: stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
mob
the terminal building,
accessing the vehicles from inside.
Thanks to all.
Stuart
From: Ed Loach [mailto:edlo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 October 2014 5:19 PM
To: Stuart Reynolds; 'Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Confused over access...
The more specific access tags take priority
Fine with me. OSM's tagging versatility is at times it's weakness so
standardising can only be a good thing.
Stuart
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:06, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
Dear all,
For all objects tagged with shop=betting and name Betfred, Coral,
I have to say that this is all getting rather intense. We are talking about one
chain of shops! And clearly we aren't going to get an agreement on
standardisation.
To be honest I've never quite understood the obsession with mapping individual
shops. Fine if it is done everywhere, but it isn't.
Mapping small shops is probably of limited use, but I do try to remove
the bias of what I do map and sometimes the only way is to map
everything. As a community dominated by male geeks we do tend to
add POIs in the order of pubs, take aways, food shops, petrol stations.
That said pubs are
Greetings, all.
Mentz (aka mdv) is a German company that provides the journey planner used by
a number of the traveline regions, as well as for Transport for London. As you
may recall from my previous posts, a number traveline regions are now using OSM
as the GIS. We found a problem
Message-
From: Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 November 2014 11:09 AM
To: Stuart Reynolds; 'SomeoneElse'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: project
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Railway edits in the UK that could perhaps benefit from
a bit of checking.
Here's just one example of an odd
November 2014 1:31 PM
To: 'Tom Hughes'; Stuart Reynolds; 'SomeoneElse'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: project
Subject: RE: Railway edits in the UK that could perhaps benefit from a bit of
checking.
taoxue is listed on:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/%C3%96V_Firma_Mentz_Datenverarbeitung_GmbH
Brian,
I'm curious. Where does it say in the sign up that there's this bunch of people
on a mailing list and you'd better check with them before you do anything?
I'm playing Devil's Advocate here, of course, but I genuinely don't believe
that people are editing the map to make it worse, and
spurs
from the footpath to the road at key points (e.g. opposite Selwyn Grove), or
what…?
Thanks
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
Greetings,
Is there a friendly mapper out there local to Stanford-le-Hope who wouldn’t
mind surveying the new Sorrell’s Rounabout junction at The Manorway /
Corringham Road? OSM at present has only part of the change and Google has
slightly more (the top third of the new roundabout), but still
station will reportedly be complete by the end of
overnight roadworks at 5am on Monday (the first buses being at 7am).
Ed
From: Stuart Reynolds [mailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk]
Sent: 02 April 2015 15:31
To: Ed Loach
Cc: talk-gb OSM List E-mail
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Any mappers
Without wanting to get into specific tags, or indeed into specific renderers,
let’s step back and see if what we have got is what we want?
The answer is probably no, IMHO.
Take Newnham College
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.19959/0.10973layers=H) which I know
fairly well. It is one
…and what does “support the development of OSM tools and apps” mean in this
context? Support in the sense that we think its great and will promote / aid /
assist, or support in the sense that we hand over a sum of money towards
development? And in that case, where does it come from? The
For those of you interested in old maps generally, you may already be aware of
the site http://www.mapco.net/ which has a wide selection of freely-viewable
historical maps of London and other places. They are only images, and they are
not digitised, however they are very useful for finding old
I don't like it for the simple reason that I think it will fail to win over new
Uk users. There are plenty of people who just want to use default tiles to show
a location on - sports pitch, scout hall, whatever - and those people will
inevitably go to Google. Sure, we understand the differences
ic has similar policies. But to know
what they are, you would have to ask them.
Regards,
Stuart
----
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 4 Jan 2016, at 10:35, Adrian Berendt
<adrian.beren...@gmail.com<mailto:adrian.beren...@gmail.com&
can access in JOSM does. So it is of
necessity approximate (and completely ignores the fact that it is on stilts as
it was built on a flood plain) - but at least it is there.
Cheers
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 4 Jan
I’m thinking that while we are reviewing the schools, it would be a good idea
to add the Edubase reference into a Ref tag for each school boundary polygon,
to make it easier to track in future. Is that reference stable enough?
If we think that it is a good idea, perhaps we could make it part of
t;> wrote:
On 05-Jan-16 17:03, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
* draw and tag the boundary polygon with a minimum of
o amenity=school
o name=*
o ref=*
* add entrances
o at least one entrance=main
o barrier=gate where appropriate - I would have thought most
schools will have
uitable tags, are the
hard-surfaced school playgrounds. Clearly, using the existing
leisure=playground is a poor idea as it changes the meaning of existing mapped
objects; and also many primary schools will have a proper playground too.
Jerry
On 6 January 2016 at 12:42, Stuart Re
Brilliant, thanks.
As per Rob's email of yesterday, should we also add ref:seedcode for Scotland?
Cheers
Stuart
> On 7 Jan 2016, at 23:01, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> On 7 January 2016 at 20:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
>>
>> If no-one objects to
I wouldn’t like to say that it is definitive, because I haven't added
playgrounds, parking or recreation facilities, but try
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36439931 or
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49655265#map=18/51.55355/0.69659 both of which
relate to Southend High School for
? Should I also name it? The schools are Hamstel Junior
School and Hamstel Infants School, together known as Hamstel Schools (which is
what the single node currently has in OSM).
Cheers
Stuart
On 8 Jan 2016, at 15:21, Stuart Reynolds
<stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk<mail
…and two schools, one site?
Cheers
Stuart
On 8 Jan 2016, at 13:27, SK53 <sk53@gmail.com<mailto:sk53@gmail.com>>
wrote:
On 8 January 2016 at 12:22, Stuart Reynolds
<stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk<mailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk>>
wrote:
Hi All,
I h
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
> On 13 Jan 2016, at 15:28, Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is there a similar national database for nurseries, or would that be
> controlled by individual local authorities?
&
OK, thanks - I’ve just changed the names of the stop, stop_position and
relation to Waterloo Road, then. The TfL stop data has longer names, but this
is what is written on the bus stop flags.
Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 17 Jan 2016, at 13:46, Colin Spiller
<co...@thespillers.org.uk<mailto:co...@thespillers.org.uk>> wrote:
Here in West Yorkshire, I have a newly-rebuilt Beckfoot School, sharing the
site and facilities with Hazelbec
to r9329) it is telling
me that it is a bad request and that the area is too large. It’s a pain if I
want to work on multiple schools to have to download bits of the town.
Thanks.
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
m: +44 7788 106165
s
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 12 Feb 2016, at 10:35, SK53 <sk53@gmail.com<mailto:sk53@gmail.com>>
wrote:
It's a limitation in the API (quarter of a degree or 50k nodes IIRC), so
Southend has crept over that limit.
Th
regarded Hamlet/Village/Town as being population-based
designators.
Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 12 Feb 2016, at 13:15, Colin Smale
<colin.sm...@xs4all.nl<mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>> wrote:
Accord
Hi Dudley,
Why?
If an organisation wants to be a member, why shouldn’t it have a say in how OSM
UK is run, including being nominated for and electing members to committees.
I’m quite comfortable with requiring an individual to be nominated, which we
can consider not allowing to be delegated,
ards,
Stuart
----
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi Jerry,
Many thanks for that view. I’m quite happy to add foot=permissive instead of
doing my proposed changes - looking for better solutions was why I asked!
Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 28 Jan 2016, at 1
them?
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.15634/-0.16124
Thanks
Stuart
----
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
I would stick with school. In Southend we have a number of primary schools with
nursery units, called "XYZ Primary School & Nursery". Those would clearly be
schools, and it makes no sense to have an artificial separation for others.
Regards
Stuart
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 Feb 2016, at
The one pub that I plotted, I added when I was doing a couple of nearby schools
and noticed that it was missing. I used exactly the same principle as for the
schools - an outer “amenity=pub” polygon and an inner “building=pub” for the
actual building.
where there are defined access points and possibly
central “information” points that could be considered “main entrances” or the
focal point of the area.
Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 13 Mar 2016, at 17:31, Brian Prangl
Is there a site or tool somewhere where I can click on a point on an OSM tile
and get back the OSGR? I want the quality of OSM, but need OSGR unfortunately.
Thanks
Stuart
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
suspect that it is the
tip of an iceberg.
Can I propose that someone who is more knowledgeable than me does a mechanical
edit within the UK to correct “Cemetary” to “Cemetery”?
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Tal
There are two huge advantages to OSM, even just looking at the UK.
The first is timeliness. OSM is almost always faster with new features than OS
(although accepting you also need a friendly local mapper). Just as a case in
point, we were looking at Wickhurst Green, near Horsham, only this
anks
Regards,
Stuart
----
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
have access to is mapping,
so OSM is out of date! Does anyone heading out that way feel like surveying?
Many thanks.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
h
to read the data
properly. But that’s too much to go into here, and if reviewing the names is in
scope then I would be happy to offer to help. One of my other “hats" is as the
Public Transport Data Standards Advisor / Expert for DfT, which includes
advising on NAPTAN.
Regards,
Stuart Rey
n.nl<mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>> wrote:
On 3 February 2017 at 19:29, Stuart Reynolds
<stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk<mailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk>>
wrote:
Also, there is often some confusion about what name goes into which fields -
people will insist on compounding names
or steeples to be added, nor to have
(for example) the height of tower, numbers of steps, flagpoles, bells, etc
added (which could be useful).
Am I right, or have I missed something? If right, do we need to agree a tagging
scheme that would allow us to enter that info?
Many thanks
Regards,
Stuart
could have
church:tower= yes | no
church:steeple= yes | no (which could assume the steeple on top of the tower,
if both present)
followed by the tower:tag=value sets as appropriate.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:53, Dan S
<dan
building=lift and highway=elevator, and two
entrance nodes. This seems strange to me. Yes, it is in accordance with the
wiki, but the elevator goes up and down, not round in a square, so it feels
counter-intuitive to have a highway as an elevator (instead of as a node).
Many thanks
Regards,
Stuart
Great, thanks.
Stuart
On 5 Sep 2016, at 20:31, SK53 <sk53@gmail.com<mailto:sk53@gmail.com>>
wrote:
I'll have a quick look in the morning & adjust the mapping accordingly (it's
under 10 minutes walk away).
Cheers,
Jerry
On 5 September 2016 at 17:24, Stuar
, defaults to
using OSM as the background mapping layer, which sits behind the Booth Map. No
idea where they are serving the tiles from, but it looks nice!
http://phone.booth.lse.ac.uk if you want to check it out.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & an
stops - but what is the right way? Tagging
the roads as access=no is simple enough, with a note, because I’m not sure
(yet) of the end status. But is there a preferred way, and what about the car
parks and the old bus station? How should that be dealt with.
Many thanks
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
, and will be retained when the development has finished.
Thanks.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 20 Sep 2016, at 15:06, m...@chrisfleming.org<mailto:m...@chrisfleming.org>
wrote:
On 20/09/16 at 11:28am, Donald wrote:
If a building or road is removed, and n
suggest that because it seemed wrong to me
What’s the view?
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 14 Oct 2016, at 07:40, Stuart Reynolds
<stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk<mailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk>>
wrote:
Hi Rob,
I didn't manage t
edited by different people, and decided at that point to await
any decision from this discussion before approaching individual users as I
didn’t know how many there were. But if, as you say, kevjs1982 is responsible
for the majority then I will approach him.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline
according to a
different thread today. And the whole purpose of me asking was, anyway, to find
out if people had a real need to tag in this unusual way before I changed it,
rather than to be told that if you found me doing it, you’d insist [my italics]
on it being reverted.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
Hi Rob,
I didn't manage to find that part of the Wiki! So thanks for bringing it to my
attention. I will take a look later.
Regards
Stuart
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Oct 2016, at 23:34, Rob Nickerson
> wrote:
Stuart,
Putting
Greetings
At Stirling Corner, on the A1 in Barnet, there is a cycle way (hence also
available for pedestrians) that goes around the outside of the roundabout
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78315291). A cursory glance at satellite
mapping shows it to be well defined, and marked. But it will
Hi Dave
Don’t disagree - just wanted to see what the community thought.
Are you Traveline?
Yes, sorry - just took out my normal footer for some reason.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 5 Dec 2016, at 16:31, Dave F
<davefoxfa...@btinternet.com<mailto
I like the rail and bus station mapping. Even where information on National
Rail Stations Made Easy exists, it is often out of date and is also not a 'data
set' in the way we understand data.
Take a look at Victoria Underground station in OSM to see what can be achieved
with levels and all the
a footpath across a break in the
crash barriers - but we don’t have that on OSM, and I’m not about to add it in.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26237116#map=18/51.21188/1.16626
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Tal
Hmm. Had forgotten that I had asked that.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 8 Mar 2017, at 11:34, Dan S
<danstowell+...@gmail.com<mailto:danstowell+...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi
foot=no would definitely be inappropriate! It would me
,
and hence Ireland and a bit of Belgium) tells me that there are 10,324 ways
which are named “Saint *” which potentially need changing if we agree that “St
*” is correct.
By contrast there are 26,559 ways that are named “St *”, and a further 7,252
that are named “St. *”.
Regards,
Stuart
egards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 10 Jul 2017, at 17:20, Ed Loach
<edlo...@gmail.com<mailto:edlo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ew. Bus route relations are a real time consuming pain to maintain. It is
possible to get both the Naptan data and the Travelin
nally, for e.g. side by side comparisons with OSM if I do
provide it?
Many thanks
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 10 Jul 2017, at 13:48, Paul Berry
<pmberry2...@gmail.com<mailto:pmberry2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You have a volunteer in me.
Do you
usly following the high water mark!
The usual policy (as per OS) is to draw a north south line across the Thames
Estuary, which irritates me for other reasons because it is a) artificial and
b) frequently rendered, but it is better than a blanket assumption that the
boundary must follow the high wat
a “big bang” from the NaPTAN
data even if you later on wish to refine the entrances by survey.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 9 May 2017, at 07:14, Andrew Hain
<andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk<mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
Does it
Use DEFRA’s “Magic” map, which allows you to stick coordinates in in a wide
variety of formats, and more importantly provides tools for seeing where a
place is in a wide variety of different referencing systems.
You can find it here: http://magic.defra.gov.uk/MagicMap.aspx
Specifically,
Hi All,
For reference, virtually all of the entrances are contained within the London
NaPTAN data (https://data.gov.uk/dataset/naptan) which is the data that begins
with the prefix 4900. The tube entrances all begin 4909ZZLU followed by a three
letter code for the station plus a digit to
The Post Office is quite happy to invent places and create addresses that don’t
reflect the reality on the ground.
For example, Shoeburyness is actually South Shoebury (the CofE church is still
called St Andrews South Shoebury) but the PO insisted (in the dim and distant
past) of calling it
I imagine so. When working in PostGIS, coordinates are Lon/Lat so that it maps
into an (x,y) format. Since JOSM displays Lat/Lon this rather sounds like the
reverse in order to preserve the presentation format.
Agree it's confusing though.
Although thanks for the tip - will now go and set
Hi Bob (and anyone else who’s done this),
I’ve reset the projection, and can now see the coordinates in OSGR. Yay!
But does anyone know how I can jump to a set of coordinates? If I click the
coordinate boxes, the menu that comes up still insists on Lat/Lon.
Thanks
Stuart
On 22 Oct 2017, at
, is it, since it
applies from London to Scotland?
Stuart
On 25 Jun 2018, at 14:27, Dave F
mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>> wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#loc_name
DaveF
On 25/06/2018 14:13, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
local road
it.
Thoughts?
Thanks
Stuart
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 25 Jun 2018, at 16:38, Adam Snape
mailto:adam.c.sn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
If this is to be mapped shouldn't it be as a historic feature rather than a
(current) road route?
By the way I tend to use loc_name for a
Hi.
If you search for B68 8RH on OSM
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=B68%208RH#map=18/52.48861/-2.00776),
you get two options. The first is from NPEMap/FreeThePostcode where the result
returned is “B68 8**”. This is located at Six Ways on the A34 in the centre of
Birmingham. The
!)
with my proposal so that I can do it? Something needs to be done, though,
because otherwise the path (and the postcode, with a centroid in the houses)
isn’t accessible via a (walking) routing engine.
Many thanks.
Regards,
Stuart
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & an
egards,
Stuart
On 25 Jan 2018, at 13:44, Mark Goodge
<m...@good-stuff.co.uk<mailto:m...@good-stuff.co.uk>> wrote:
On 25/01/2018 11:48, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Who do we need to speak to at FreeThePostcode to get it fixed? Does anyone have
any contacts?
FreeThePostcode is obso
Hi
I’ve watched this from afar, but thought that I would add my two pennyworth, as
a more casual mapper.
Historic county boundaries have some merit (in a very general sense), but where
do you draw the line? As it happens, I was discussing where, exactly, Middlesex
was with my son only
Hi All,
Brian is right, I think, to say that it is best rendered by another map (which
is what traveline does, after all) - it really isn’t that easy to keep up to
date in OSM relations, which I find to be counter-intuitive, personally.
However, in case you want the other options:
- data in
[Side question, albeit not totally off-topic]
Out of curiosity, I understand what a C road is, conceptually, but what might
an “MC” designation mean? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426675505
Regards,
Stuart
On 24 Sep 2018, at 09:30, Paul Berry
mailto:pmberry2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I’m all for debate and coming to a consensus, but my message counter has got to
108 mails in this thread, and I have to say that from where I am sitting it’s
all becoming rather tedious. The same arguments (albeit polite) are being
rehashed, nothing new is being said, and no-one is showing any
Hi All,
My attention has been drawn (by a local authority colleague) to a street in
Tunbridge Wells, Grosvenor Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35929327).
This is a bi-directional road that has timed restrictions heading north between
9am and 8pm, with buses allowed to head north up it
like OSM simply
because of its lack of permanence. At best, it will be an aligned data set IMHO.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east & anglia
On 4 Apr 2019, at 10:37, Andy Townsend
mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 04/04/2019 09:38, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi ever
On 3 Jun 2019, at 09:15, Stuart Reynolds
mailto:stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk>>
wrote:
As Jerry says, from a routing perspective having lots of separate footpaths
doesn’t help when you can just walk across the road at any given point.
Boulevard-type roads with central grassed
://nextbuses.mobi/WebView/BusStopSearch/BusStopSearchResults/soadjdaw
Both the SMS and Nexbuses services are still active, and not planned to be
turned off any time soon.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east and anglia
On 5 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Gareth L mailto:o...@live.co.uk>>
wrote
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo