Re: [Talk-de] Lizenz für Programme und Code

Also neben der GPL-irgendwas ist Apache 2.0 definitiv eine der populärsten SW Lizenzen. Am 01.03.2016 um 10:59 schrieb Markus: > Liebe Entwickler, > > Welche Lizenz verwendet Ihr für Eure Programme/Code? > > Es scheint folgende Unterschiede für freie Lizenzen zu geben: > > 1. ganz frei > 2. mit

Re: [Talk-us] API Behavior

some kind of bounding box based index for ways and relations (note we don't use PostGIS and it wouldn't actually help in this case, so this would have to be home grown in some form), naturally calculating the bounding box would make many operations that are now very cheap rather expensive. S

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] [Talk-us] license changes

h Craigslist is a spec of dust in the Atlantic in comparison, that have no issues using OSM outside of the US, your desire is clearly is not a legal question, but far more a quality issue that only the US OSM community can address and resolve. Simon signat

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] [Talk-us] license changes

g in the ODbL and CC licences - a treaty on the "can I be sued by an OSM contributor" issue - grace periods in the CC and ODbL licences Naturally OSM-US is completely free to discuss whatever it wants with whomever it wants, but that works the other way around too. Simon Am 22.02.2016 u

Re: [Talk-de] Offene Geodaten in Sachsen - Bitte noch abwarten

Sachsen gabs eine gewisse Hoffnung am Anfang, dass das so sein könnte, aber jetzt ist es klar das dem nicht so ist. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https

[Talk-de] Solingen

uf die ich verweisen könnte? Der Kontakt ist ja auch so oder so sicher nützlich. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk] What is 'Attic Data'? or 'Why can't wiki writers use plain language'.

The "attic" is used (in previous non-hipster software development times) as the place for storage of outdated/dead etc code Now days it is called github :-). Simon Am 04.02.2016 um 08:12 schrieb Paul Johnson: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Importing from an application's user generated content

eful, which you may or may not believe depending on how gullible you are, but I digress). It is an important part of getting hooked. At least it should be clear where their contributions are going to end up and integration with OSM proper should be as fast as possible. Simon

[OSM-talk-fr] Problème Umap - Tile.openstreetmap rendu BANO sous firefox

ce problème aurait déjà été remonté? problème serveur ou autre? Merci, Simon ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Trouble understanding the "Derivative database" implications

Am 29.01.2016 um 19:43 schrieb Simon Poole: > The OpenStreetMap is exactly that (a wiki), anybody can write > essentially anything on it wiki signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Trouble understanding the "Derivative database" implications

* http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License * http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines For information from the OSMF. There is a new policy currently with the OSMF board that will address yours and similar use cases, once it is formally approved. Simon Am 29.01.2016 um

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] new wiki page ODbL compatibility of common licenses

ds to be determined by looking at the actual licence text, see the OS version of the OGL and the current upset with the Australian GNAF data (licensed on terms of a modified CC-BY 4.0) for examples of such issues. Simon Am 18.01.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Following a thread on the OSMF-

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] A9 mise en service d'une nouvelle section

Il n'y a plus qu'à mettre à jour Wikipedia http://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_A9_(France) Gaël Le 14 janv. 2016 à 09:08, Julien Nuts a écrit : La mise en service d'une nouvelle section de l'A9 a été mise en service cette nuit. J'ai fait les modifications, passage de

Re: [OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers

nt commits. Not sure if you can simply use one of the config versions in P2 though or if it would require cooperation from Richard. Simon Am 08.01.2016 um 23:13 schrieb Steve Doerr: > When editing in Potlatch 2, the list of background layers seems rather > short. In particular, Mapnik (t

Re: [OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers

ing specific features, editing in areas without useful areial imagery and so on. Simon > > On 8 January 2016 at 23:13, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote: >> When editing in Potlatch 2, the list of background layers seems rather >> short. In particular

Re: [OSM-talk] Not sure what to think

ch sense. I think this > is a case where practical judgment must outweigh theoretical concerns. They have at least historically made noises about 3rd parties (aka MS) using their search results. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [OSM-talk] Not sure what to think

Oh, no.. not again. Please have a look at previous threads with similar topics. The majority of the google source tags reflect permitted use after the Earthquake in 2010. Further as has already been said the use of StreetView is not allowed. Simon Am 07.01.2016 um 11:47 schrieb Hans De Kryger

Re: [OSM-talk] Not sure what to think

M is at least potentially problematic (and the same goes for any other collection/database of websites). Google doesn't seem to say anything explicit on the matter, but then I just might be missing it. SImon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Not sure what to think

Am 07.01.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Thursday 07 January 2016, Simon Poole wrote: >>> I use Google almost every time I add to the database. For example >>> in Great Britain there's currently a project to map & update all >>> schools in

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned buildings

of general interest. In any case I'm not quite sure what your issue with using overpass is? Simon Am 06.01.2016 um 12:02 schrieb John Doe: > > Ok i agree, the rendering is not so important and i can use other > tools, but why i can't search abandoned stuff with nominatim? this is > not so

Re: [talk-au] Residential/commercial property boundaries

on the talk or talk-us mailings lists some time back. Simon Am 03.01.2016 um 07:29 schrieb Michael Gratton: > > Hey all, > > Now that the NSW LPI goldmine is available, I'd like to be able to tag > individual residential and commercial property boundaries. Looking at > the wiki, it s

[OSM-talk-fr] Site Suivi

Bonjour, Depuis quelques jours, je n'accède plus au site suivi.openstreetmap.fr , en particulier pour le suivi des cours d'eau. Avez-vous également ce souci ? Bonne journée Gaël ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch down?

See https://github.com/openstreetmap/potlatch2/commit/0c126d021f753a9a67e0a7beca8bf6000683ec37 Am 31.12.2015 um 11:28 schrieb NopMap: > Richard Fairhurst wrote >> Should be fixed now. TomH identified that a Passenger upgrade caused >> requests to break, though exactly why isn't yet clear... >

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data to be released under open license

and further means it does not meet the definition here http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/. Sorry Simon Am 07.12.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Daniel O'Connor: > Hi all, > Many of you may be interested in > https://blog.data.gov.au/news-media/blog/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data to be released under open license

2a2 Am 30.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Jason Ward: > Hi Simon, > > Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be 3a4 of > [1] as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to the > downstream osm licence. I've read the links below and on a first pass > it a

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data to be released under open license

ith CC by 4.0 based licences that remain unresolved, see the discussion on legal-talk.in May 2015. Simon > [1] - http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/ > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 21:39 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote: > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] NSW LPI permission

to a conclusion yet either. Simon Am 28.12.2015 um 11:19 schrieb Robert Whittaker (OSM lists): > On 21 December 2015 at 16:48, Tom Lee <t...@mapbox.com> wrote: >> The key thing here is that OSM *itself* would clearly be in compliance with >> LPI's terms. I think that's the bar that h

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using a WMS imagery with CC-BY4.0

Am 28.12.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Simon Poole: > > that we other attribution in the contributor terms and on the other > That naturally should have been "that we offer attribution in the contributor terms ..." signature.asc Description: OpenPG

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using a WMS imagery with CC-BY4.0

rstanding there, CC by is not going to be an option as long as we have a licence with a share-alike component. The only thing that we are discussing for now is attribution only input licences. Simon > if it were compatible with the ODbL. > > On 15 July 2015 at 00:22, Tom Lee <t...@mapbo

[OSM-legal-talk] City of Victoria BC Canada Open Data Licence

pursuing? thanks Simon ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [talk-au] Importing Vicmap Lite data

ries before then you should be doing boundaries before. That will give you some idea of what you are getting in to and will give you answers to your questions. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim weakness

Sigh, this could easily be the silliest thread ever on talk. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim#Parameters In general for POI search in an area I would suggest using OverPass/OverPass Turbo (note however that this has the same issue as a bounded Nominatim POI search in that it will

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim weakness

Nomination POI searches do not use the bounding box and that is not exactly news. On 14. Dezember 2015 01:04:38 MEZ, Mike N wrote: >On 12/13/2015 6:47 PM, Jorge Gustavo Rocha wrote: >> ii) Nominatim can search only within a bounding box. You can get the >map >> extent and

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plugin JOSM PDFimport

? :) Le 10 déc. 2015 6:30 PM, "Gaël Simon" <gael.simon...@gmail.com> a écrit : Bonjour, Quelqu'un a-t-il utilisé récemment le plugin Pdfimport ? Chez moi, il plante à l'ouverture d'un pdf. Merci pour vos retours Gaël ___ Talk-fr mail

Re: [OSM-talk] Involving Cyclists in OSM

That is not PL specific, but naturally is rather limited in helpfulness. Am 10.12.2015 um 12:23 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:24:54 +0100 > Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > >> road works (ok we don't have that) > Depends on region. So

[OSM-talk-fr] Plugin JOSM PDFimport

Bonjour, Quelqu'un a-t-il utilisé récemment le plugin Pdfimport ? Chez moi, il plante à l'ouverture d'un pdf. Merci pour vos retours Gaël ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk] Involving Cyclists in OSM

ocumenting their "standard" rides, ancillary infrastructure (sources of compressed air, bicycle shops, publicly available tools, road works (ok we don't have that)), lots of overlap with Strava customers (in the US) Simon Am 09.12.2015 um 01:40 schrieb Clifford Snow: > I am meeting with

Re: [OSM-talk] Involving Cyclists in OSM

should be included in the above http://cycle.travel/ (which is clearly one of the most polished sites in OSMspace). Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] openstreetmap.org down?

Ich frag mich ja wieso ihr immer spekuliert anstatt nachzuschauen: https://twitter.com/OSM_Tech/status/674185265842360320 und https://twitter.com/jiscmi Simon Am 08.12.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Holger Jeromin: > Carl von Einem wrote on 08.12.2015 12:38: >> hike39 wrote on 08.12.15 11:44:

[OSM-talk-fr] Api indisponible ?

Bonjour, Aucune donnée n'est plus chargée, ni dans JOSM, ni dans GoMap. N'y a-t-il pas un souci avec l'api openstreetmap.org ? Quelqu'un a-t-il le même souci ? Gaël ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM

May I suggest adding similar entries to https://github.com/osmlab/editor-imagery-index so that iD and other editors can make the imagery available too? Thanks Simon Am 08.12.2015 um 07:54 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > I've put together a JOSM Imagery Sources document at > https://gist.gith

Re: [OSM-talk] Graphic vector maps - Illustrator

Your website requires google analytics to be allowed (doesn't work without). IMHO not a good idea considering your target audience. Simon Am 07.12.2015 um 12:50 schrieb Stijn Tallir: > Hi, > > Just to get the word out. > > As of last week Aquaterra has opened an online web-shop

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data

is not sooo small and in principle should support quite a large OSM community), but as you see that didn't happen quite so fast. In any case thank you for your work. Simon Am 06.12.2015 um 02:54 schrieb Andrew Davidson: > Rather ironically I'm about half a dozen suburbs from completing > Sydney.

Re: [Talk-us] QA tool to find duplicate addresses?

mouth Drive" ("addr:housenumber"="415") >>"addr:street"="Rudd Road" ("addr:housenumber"="219") >>"addr:street"="Shadow Mountain Terrace" >("addr:housenumber"="1144") >>

Re: [Talk-us] QA tool to find duplicate addresses?

OSMOSE does that http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/ Am 07.12.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Tod Fitch: > I’ve come across data from an old address import that seems to have numerous > duplicate addresses. It would be nice to point JOSM to the places with the > most problems rather than to just

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

in this class. Mofas on the other hand, where the class exists, typically have a requirement for pedals (adding pedelecs in to the mix just makes things more complicated so leaving that away for now). Obviously a moped without pedals is fairly dead when the motor isn't running :-) Simon * just

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

Ben See http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ Your point is exactly why I'm asking for feedback. Particularly vehicle classifications tend to differ quite a bit between countries, even in those that are signatories to the Vienna convention (which the US is not). Simon Am 01.12.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Ben

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

I've changed the relevant tags to moped=no. Any opinion on if mopeds would be included in "motor vehicles"? I don't think I've ever seen a mofa in the states (I find people on Vespas in the states already fairly brave) but what about pedelecs and similar? Simon Am 01.12.2015 um 15:

[Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

is the default preset for Vespucci http://vespucci.io/ (obviously on mobile devices being able to touch an icon is preferable to typing). Any opinions on the mappings, and what would you consider signs that you frequently map? Feedback and patches welcome! Simon signature.asc Description

Re: [Talk-de] Lizenzgenerika Was: OSM bei Polizei?

Am 30.11.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > Ich denke, das muss man für die Nichtdabeigewesenen noch weiter erläutern. > > Was man vielleicht noch sagen sollte: der effektive Lizenzwechsel war der Schluss eines 5-jährigen Prozesses. Die Weichenstellung dazu erfolgte am Anfang da war

Re: [Talk-de] Lizenzgenerika Was: OSM bei Polizei?

Am 30.11.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Florian Lohoff: eien Menge Sachen Für die die nicht dabei waren und deshalb den Wahrheitsgehalt nicht selber beurteilen können: natürlich hat es, sehr ausgedehnte, Diskussionen darüber gegeben was die Eigenschaften einer neuen Lizenz sein sollten.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

Am 23.11.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries > to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result > publicly. > > Are you -actually- doing this or would like to it or is this a thought experiment?

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

> Stefano > > 2015-11-22 12:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>: > > It is not as if there are not numerous alternative addressing schemes > see for example this list (which was produced for an open system from, > gosh,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] question regarding produced work

? there are 4 responses to your mail, at least one with a question that you haven't answered . Am 19.11.2015 um 08:51 schrieb Lars-Daniel Weber: > Three days are gone and still no discussion about this topic. > I think, nobody is really interested in discovering license violations and >

[OSM-legal-talk] Interesting ruling by the ECJ

For those that do not read weeklyOSM/Wochennotiz (you really should) http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62014CJ0490=de=TXT= Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] A message to our friends at HOT, Peace Corps etc. about Changeset Comments

Am 19.11.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Paul Johnson: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote: > > This seems a bit of an odd time to announce a schism and I'm sure > you didn't intend for your statement to

Re: [OSM-talk] A message to our friends at HOT, Peace Corps etc. about Changeset Comments

d after repeated attempts to even discuss an issue. I would be interested in a reference to that. We get a large number of enquiries, ~ 200 this year to date, and occasionally stuff gets pushed back, particularly if there is no good answer (naturally you would get an answer pointing that out). Simon

Re: [OSM-talk] A message to our friends at HOT, Peace Corps etc. about Changeset Comments

in to the trap of believing their own marketing copy and realize that they are a small minority in the larger OSM community and are dependent on the good will and support of the wider OSM community to make a difference. Simon Am 19.11.2015 um 14:28 schrieb Kate Chapman: > Hi Christoph, > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

the sign up process without creating a cascade of further problems. Simon PS: given that this is slowly getting very off topic , I would suggest carrying on the discussion on the legal-talk list. Am 18.11.2015 um 02:26 schrieb Simon Poole: > > > Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman: &g

Re: [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

the sign up process without creating a cascade of further problems. Simon PS: given that this is slowly getting very off topic , I would suggest carrying on the discussion on the legal-talk list. Am 18.11.2015 um 02:26 schrieb Simon Poole: > > > Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman: &g

Re: [OSM-talk] Seek support for worldwide mapathon on Dec 3rd for places accessibility

and searching for user groups on the wiki is probably a good idea). Simon Am 18.11.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Holger Dieterich: > Dear fellow OSM members, > > I'm the cofounder of http://wheelmap.org and want to ask for your > advice and support for a mapathon we are planning. > > The

Re: [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

I assume that you have got legal advice on the COPPA related consequences of your activities and are willing to share this with the OSMF? Simon Am 17.11.2015 um 02:45 schrieb Steven Johnson: > Hello list, > > Just in time for #OSMGeoweek, TeachOSM with support from Mapstory.org >

Re: [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

t it was never minuted,, but the current and past board members that were involved are well aware of this. Simon * personal opinion as a parent is that I don't see a value in trying to get kids to spend even more time in from of a screen simply arm chairing, but going outside collecting stuff, gre

Re: [Talk-de] OSM bei Polizei?

Jahren auf eine Lizenz ohne Quellenhinweis umstellen. aber das wird die meisten hier, inklusive mich, nicht mehr so wirklich interessieren. Simon Am 17.11.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Florian Lohoff: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:43:04PM +, Sven Geggus wrote: >> Frederik Ramm <frede..

Re: [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman: > Hi Simon, > > The groups releasing Geobadges "TeachOSM with support from > Mapstory.org and American Geographical Society" are not large > multi-million dollar US organizations. None of them have highly paid >

Re: [Talk-us] GeoBadges 1.0 for OpenStreetMap

to find out and address any issues. I don't want to dig too deep in to the things that might be considered problematic given general US paranoia on such topics, but I would consider completely ignoring this a bit risky. Simon Am 17.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Steven Johnson: > Hi Simon, > The deve

Re: [Talk-de] OSM bei Polizei?

So was wie "Attributierung" gibt es nicht, wie wärs mal mit Deutsch. Es gibt im Urheberrecht überhaupt keine Pflicht seine Rechte durchzusetzen auch wenn du seit Jahren immer wieder den gleichen Blödsinn behauptest. Simon Am 17.11.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Florian Lohoff: > On Tue,

Re: [Talk-de] OSM bei Polizei?

Du wiederholst nur den gleichen alten Schmarrn. Der Lizenzgeber kann in seinem eigenen Ermessen entscheiden wie und wann er allfällige Lizenzverletzungen verfolgt oder nicht, bis jetzt hat immer hat mehr oder weniger sanfter Druck gereicht (von wegen "nicht plant"). Simon Am 17.11.201

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] question regarding produced work

/Community_Guidelines/Trivial_Transformations_-_Guideline Simon Am 16.11.2015 um 12:25 schrieb Lars-Daniel Weber: > Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! > > The website "http://öpnvkarte.de/; is based on OpenStreetMap data, licensed > under ODbL. It shows produced work (rendered tile image

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Obstacle central sur route 2 x 1 voie ?

Bonsoir, Il doit suffire de dédoubler la route en 2 tronçons en sens unique Gaël Le 15 nov. 2015 à 19:08, "pepilepi...@ovh.fr" a écrit : Bonsoir, Parfois sur une route ordinaire, deux voies, double sens, à une intersection on trouve sur une vingtaine de mètres un muret ou

Re: [OSM-talk] Why newbies' comment/message response rate is so low?

going forward. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Extractions du cadastre indisponibles

Bonjour, Une source de simplification supplémentaire pourrait être de supprimer les points "alignés" (à moins de 20 cm ?). Ça pourrait éviter de surcharger la base avec des points inutiles, générés souvent aux limites de parcelle. Gaël Le 6 nov. 2015 à 23:32, Tyndare a

Re: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=* tags

by a committee. Simon Am 09.11.2015 um 07:39 schrieb GerdP: > Hi all, > > sorry for the late reaction, I was offline for two days visiting a friend > for his 50th aniversary. > > Andrew Guertin wrote >> In my opinion, some of these changes are positive and some are negativ

[Talk-at] LUGT/OSM-Stammtisch am 12. November 2015

freuen uns auf ein zahlreiches Erscheinen! Die Einladung ist wie immer auch auf der LUGT-Webseite und im OSM-Wiki zu finden: http://www.lugt.at/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Innsbruck/Stammtisch Grüße Simon ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Extractions du cadastre indisponibles

Bonjour, Une source de simplification supplémentaire pourrait être de supprimer les points "alignés" (à moins de 20 cm ?). Ça pourrait éviter de surcharger la base avec des points inutiles, générés souvent aux limites de parcelle. Gaël Le 6 nov. 2015 à 23:32, Tyndare a

Re: [OSM-talk] Undiscussed (?) edits removing lesser-used highway=* tags

Am 06.11.2015 um 21:42 schrieb Andrew Guertin: > ... > Does anyone know if this was discussed anywhere? It seems to be a result of a misguided discussion on the tagging list, which came to the conclusion that data consumers need to be protected from the (typically very low number) the dangerous

[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

proceeding to formal board approval and publishing in a matter of days. The text can be found here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collective_Database_Guideline Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list

[OSM-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

proceeding to formal board approval and publishing in a matter of days. The text can be found here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collective_Database_Guideline Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

modelled, instead of trying to define this via the technical realisation, and particularly not try to map them to elements that don't exist in the OSM data model ("multiline string"). > Does this distinction depend on the way I use the data? And finally: > will the active contributors

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Carto: White Roads & Road Widths

to weight for a re-import plus "style" change (there is lots of stuff that is dependent on that, but I'm not sure if a re-import is actually still being discussed). Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tal

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: [HOT] Cat-5 Hurricane Patricia heading to Mexican Pacific Coast

Am 25.10.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Blake Girardot: > .. > I think Simon was talking about a slightly different issue than HOT's > use of open data from the Mexican government as part of HOT's > activities related to this disaster. Yes correct, CC-by compatibility is always a hot topic

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: [HOT] Cat-5 Hurricane Patricia heading to Mexican Pacific Coast

in OSM. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

Am 22.10.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Peter Barth: > Hi, > > ich muss sagen, der Thread war für mich jetzt irgendwie ganz interessant > und aufschlussreich. > > Simon Poole schrieb: >> [...] >> die LWG verlässt sich daraf, dass Fälle die nicht von der "Community&

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

Am 22.10.2015 um 20:20 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Thursday 22 October 2015, Simon Poole wrote: >> Ich hab ein paar Stichproben bei den >> aktuelleren, offenen Fällen (post Lizenzwechsel) gemacht davon war >> eine nicht als OSM basierende Karte erkennbar und bei d

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

e nicht als OSM basierende Karte erkennbar und bei den anderen war der Quellenhinweis korrekt, das Durchsetzungsdefizits sehe ich nicht ganz, ausser das Leute da was eintragen und dann selber nichts weiter machen. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

ie kleinen Übersichtskarten , bei denen der Quellenhinweis fehlt? Der Verweis auf google wenn man die google map api verwendet ist zwar ägerlich von der OSM-Marketingperspektive, ist aber natürlich legal. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

t wurden). Mir wäre auch kein aktueller Fall bekannt, bei dem Organisationen nachdem sie von uns kontaktiert haben sich geweigert hätten ihr Verhalten zu ändern (es sind nicht alle Pendenzen abgearbeitet aber der Grund dafür ist ja klar). Simon signature.asc Descript

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

Am 22.10.2015 um 14:42 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Am 22. Oktober 2015 um 14:03 schrieb Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch>: > >> In beiden Fällen die Martin genannt hat wurden die fraglichen Firmen >> kontaktiert und in beiden Fällen wurde das Verhalten geändert, >> &

Re: [Talk-de] Massive OSM-Lizenz-Verletzung durch Kartenanbieter outdooractive.com (u. a. auch Alpenverein betroffen)

zt daran liegt, dass der Hinweis > nicht den zuständigen Entscheidungsträger erreicht hat kann man > natürlich nicht sagen. Noe, die Liste wird absichtlich ignoriert, siehe auch was unter "Process" (seit 2009) steht. Simon signature.as

Re: [Talk-de] Neues GPS, schlechte Performance...

Ich würde ev. das http://www.amazon.com/2000-GLONASS-RECEIVER-iPod-iPhone/dp/B00COLB9FS empfehlen, Bedienung ist zwar nicht gerade der Hammer, ist aber billig und tut was es soll, für mapillary mindestens (habs jetzt nie als klassischen Logger zum Tracks aufnehmen verwendet). Zu dem

Re: [Talk-us] Increasing the number of US Mappers

group facility which can support very fine grained and self-organized grouping of contributors with common interests (or whatever). Simon Am 16.10.2015 um 04:59 schrieb stevea: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-us

Re: [Talk-de] Lizenz der thüringer und niedersächsichen Straßennamen in der Straßenlistenauswertung?

Ich will nicht Dietmar vorgreifen, aber die Strassenlistenauswertung hat ja keine Geometrien aus den staatlichen Listen. Sprich die Leute kopieren mit Sicherheit von google. Simon Am 15.10.2015 um 18:18 schrieb Michael Reichert: > Hallo Dietmar, hallo Liste, > > in der Straßenlistena

Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap US elections: October 12 townhall with candidates

parties which are great as a fun focal point for the community, but are hopeless at any measurable increase in new mappers. Simon PS: I do admit that I had to chuckle at the realisation in some of the manifestos that SOTM-US size was/is a self-inflicted rat race. signature.asc Description

[Talk-at] Graphenintegrations-Plattform GIP als OGD

BY 3.0 AT verwendet werden. Grüße Simon [1] http://gip.gv.at/news/items/gip-als-open-government-data-ogd.html [2] http://gip.gv.at/ogd.html ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

[Talk-at] LUGT/OSM-Stammtisch am 15. Oktober 2015 (im Bierstindl!)

Servus! Wir möchten zum nächsten gemeinsamen LUGT-/OSM-Stammtisch einladen: am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015 um 19:00 Uhr im Bierstindl, Klostergasse 6, 6020 Innsbruck, http://www.bierstindl.eu/ Achtung – geänderter Ort: Wir sind dieses wieder Mal im Bierstindl in Innsbruck! Wir

Re: [OSM-talk] Issues with changeset comment notification?

The issue is that the notifications are sent by mail and as such may easily disappear somewhere . See https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/908 Am 12.10.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Florian Lohoff: > Hi, > i have a response of a user who said that he did not get any comment on

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

Am 12.10.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Mr. Stace D Maples: > .. > Neither of the projects was scrapped because we /couldn’t/ use OSM for > the project, but because we couldn’t determine IF WE COULD use OSM for > our particular uses. > > ... And you or your legal department approached the licensor of

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

in separate threads with topics that clearly indicate what they are about. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

the discussion page is completely OK too. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

Michael thanks for the feed back it is very helpful. Anybody else with input? IMHO we might do away completely with a negative (as in share alike invoked) example because of the issues this has caused and undoubtedly will continue to cause. Simon Am 02.10.2015 um 18:31 schrieb Michael

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >