Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

No, non ci sono due possibilità, ce n'è una sola: quella della wiki. Cantone Ferruccio (canfe) -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Maurizio Napolitano < napoo...@gmail.com>: > Lancio un appello: > ragioniamo su questa pagina qualora volessimo cambiare la questione? > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade Mi sembra che già la

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Il 28/04/20 11:53, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli :

Re: [Talk-it] [Import] Bologna - Coronavirus spesa a domicilio

Il giorno mar 28 apr 2020 alle ore 10:32 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > On 28. Apr 2020, at 09:50, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: > > Ho pensato ad un import tramite umap e level0. > > 600+ nodi non solo pochi, ma ho trovato problemi a taggare automaticamente. Se pensate

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

for what it matters, I completely subscribe Skyler's position. I'm a software engineer, and I produce GPL and AGPL software (not LGPL), but I do not have the power to enforce anything, I just hope that people will be considerate. it's surprising that the lax attitude comes from a committee

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 17:36 Uhr schrieb canfe : > No, non ci sono due possibilità, ce n'è una sola: quella della wiki. > > Cantone Ferruccio (canfe) Caro Cantone, magari fosse chiara la wiki, purtroppo per i nomi nella mappa non dice come fare, dice di fare per stradari, indirizzari e

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Visto che il documento non è più presente, ho cercato nel sito dell'Agenzia delle entrate e ho trovato un documento del 2018

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

On 28/04/2020 15:01, Kathleen Lu wrote: I know no major open source license that requires attribution *in the UI that the user sees without clicking on anything*. oh, but thinking of code I don't particularly care about the UI. I care about the code, and if I release some code as GPL, you as

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

> the header of the code, that's the place where the attribution is expected. > > roughly equivalent to some corner in the displayed map, that's what the > license says, right? > I do not think these two things are at all equivalent. OSM is a database, so the equivalent attribution notice to the

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

It’s a database technically, but it’s a database purpose-built for making maps. Hence the name OpenStreetMap. The attribution goes on the map. This is not a difficult requirement to meet. —Joseph Eisenberg ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

I find this view quite surprising coming from a software engineer. I know no major open source license that requires attribution *in the UI that the user sees without clicking on anything*. Every example of open source license attribution I have seen is after several clicks, e.g.

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

sent from a phone > On 28. Apr 2020, at 23:34, Kathleen Lu via talk > wrote: > > The FAQ is not the license. The license is the ODbL. The ODbL says absolutely > nothing about whether attribution should be on a map or not. Read it here: > https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/index.html

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

> I absolutely agree that looking at industry standard seems a good indication > of what is reasonable. > If someone is hitting OSM's tile server, then that would be the industry > equivalent of using Google or HERE's API, for which they typically require > on-map logo attribution. > For using

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

I absolutely agree that looking at industry standard seems a good indication of what is reasonable. If someone is hitting OSM's tile server, then that would be the industry equivalent of using Google or HERE's API, for which they typically require on-map logo attribution. For using *data* from

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 08:25 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli < franci...@gmail.com>: > >> 1) innanzitutto vi chiedo un parere su che cosa debba andare nel tag >> "name": a mio parere si mappa quello che c'è sul campo (nel caso della nota >> in questione "Via Pio XI", che compare sui cartelli) e

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 08:57 Uhr schrieb canfe : > Non sono d'accordo. > C'è una pagina wiki che specifica come vanno scritti i nomi delle vie. > O le regole valgono per tutti o ognuno si inventa quella che piu' gli > piace. > non si tratta di inventare, ci sono 2 possibilità: nomi come si

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Ciao, Il lun 27 apr 2020, 22:55 Marco Minghini ha scritto: > Ciao a tutti, > un paio di settimane fa Lorenzo Stucchi aveva segnalato su Telegram > l'apertura di circa 200 note in corrispondenza di strade, da parte di un > utente anonimo nella zona nord di Milano (fino a Como e Lecco) in cui

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Il mar 28 apr 2020, 07:57 Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: > Almeno gli addr:* sono coerenti adesso? > Anche questo è un controllo fondamentale quando si cambiano i nomi: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/it/byuser/mcheck?username=mcheck=5080 Ci tengo a dire che uso il nome di mcheck come esempio

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Ciao, concordo con canfe. In questa ML si rifanno periodicamente le stesse discussioni, dimenticandosi di averle già fatte. Sarebbe utile rileggersi gli ultimi thread. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-April/058290.html

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Ciao Canfe, On 28/04/20 08:57, canfe wrote: Non sono d'accordo. C'è una pagina wiki che specifica come vanno scritti i nomi delle vie. O le regole valgono per tutti o ognuno si inventa quella che piu' gli piace.

[Talk-it] [Import] Bologna - Coronavirus spesa a domicilio

Ciao lista! I dati del comune di Bologna e zone limitrofe sono appena stati liberati apposta per OSM :-) Ho steso una bozza di wiki [1]. Ho pensato ad un import tramite umap e level0. 600+ nodi non solo pochi, ma ho trovato problemi a taggare automaticamente. Se pensate possa essere oneroso,

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Non sono d'accordo. C'è una pagina wiki che specifica come vanno scritti i nomi delle vie. O le regole valgono per tutti o ognuno si inventa quella che piu' gli piace. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade Inoltre mi denuncio di avere fatto un

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Concordo con te, mi sembra che ormai fosse una regola ormai assodata, non vedo nessun problema. Alecs -- Inviato da Libero Mail per Android martedì, 28 aprile 2020, 08:58AM +02:00 da canfe canfe.n...@gmail.com : >Non sono d'accordo. >C'è una pagina wiki che specifica come vanno scritti i nomi

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Il mar 28 apr 2020, 09:28 Alessandro Sarretta ha scritto: > Ciao Canfe, > On 28/04/20 08:57, canfe wrote: > > Non sono d'accordo. > C'è una pagina wiki che specifica come vanno scritti i nomi delle vie. > O le regole valgono per tutti o ognuno si inventa quella che piu' gli >

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Ciao a tutti e grazie per il primo round di commenti, mi sembra che la discussione si stia concentrando sul punto 1), evidenziando comunque di riflesso i problemi sui punti 2) e 3). Sono anch'io d'accordo nel rispettare la wiki e ringrazio per aver segnalato la pagina, ma faccio notare che: -

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

Am Di., 28. Apr. 2020 um 06:51 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole : > > Am 27.04.2020 um 19:49 schrieb Alexandre Oliveira: > > Hello! > > > > I'll try to be brief and explain the main problems that exist with > > OSM's way of handling lack of (proper) attribution. > > > There was just a (nearly 100

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Il 28/04/2020 11:56, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: Noi non siamo i comuni... Se loro procedono, seguiamo, se non lo fanno, non cambiamo nemmeno noi. Ma senza tenere una linea comune, si rischia di confondere l'utente finale e/o rendere meno fruibile la mappa. Personalmente, sono per seguire

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Telenav Mapping Project

Hello Joost, Most likely we will begin next week to edit on the map. We will keep you all up to date with our progress and any edits that we might do. Thank you for your support. p.s. It’s nice too hear you visited Cluj-Napoca. If it has been a long time ago, the city has developed quite

Re: [Talk-it] [Import] Bologna - Coronavirus spesa a domicilio

sent from a phone > On 28. Apr 2020, at 09:50, Cascafico Giovanni wrote: > > I dati del comune di Bologna e zone limitrofe sono appena stati liberati > apposta per OSM :-) > > Ho steso una bozza di wiki [1]. > > Ho pensato ad un import tramite umap e level0. > 600+ nodi non solo pochi, ma

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Telenav Mapping Project

Hello Midgard, Thank you for your reply. We have indeed encountered many false-positive results from keep right during our edits. But as you mentioned, it helps bringing up any potential errors that we can review and then correct only if needed. Kind regards, Adrian -Original

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Ciao, Concordo con quanto è stato detto prima, vorrei però sottolineare il problema principale che sono le note anonime. Ne vengono caricate a decine ogni giorno, (30 solo stamattina) [1] sono anonime e non è possibile risalire a chi le pubblica e tra l’altro contengono informazioni sbagliate

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:55 PM Marco Minghini wrote: > > Ciao a tutti, > un paio di settimane fa Lorenzo Stucchi aveva segnalato su Telegram > l'apertura di circa 200 note in corrispondenza di strade, da parte di un > utente anonimo nella zona nord di Milano (fino a Como e Lecco) in cui viene

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

Il mar 28 apr 2020, 11:13 Lorenzo Stucchi ha scritto: > Ciao, > > Concordo con quanto è stato detto prima, vorrei però sottolineare il > problema principale che sono le note anonime. > > Ne vengono caricate a decine ogni giorno, (30 solo stamattina) [1] sono > anonime e non è possibile risalire

Re: [Talk-it] Modifiche massive nomi di strade in seguito a note anonime

> In realtà dovrebbe essere: > Viale dei Giardini Lancio un appello: ragioniamo su questa pagina qualora volessimo cambiare la questione? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade ___ Talk-it mailing

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

John and Donal, This made it so easy. In under eleven minutes I loaded all 87 civil parishes into Josm and Excluding the four in Ardfert, there was one duplicate name, selected the 83 I wanted, the downloaded all the members, then using John's select the dissolved members I created a new Diocese

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

lanes=1 ohne oneway=no|yes wird von einigen (auch von mir als moeglicher Fehler) betrachtet, und ist daher keine gute Idee. Ich verstehe das tagging da ueberhaupt nicht. Besipiel: Liemekestrasse ist mit seltsaman tags versehen:

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Why is Billy parish in Antrim shown as in Athlone Municipal District?

Brian, I looked at https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?osmtype=R=10993573=boundary Normally this allows me to understand why a certain admin hierarchy is returned. In this case, I do not understand why the distance is 0.1746 for the Athlone Municipal District. It seems to be the

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Why is Billy parish in Antrim shown as in Athlone Municipal District?

it should be returned when the object is outside. => it should NOT be returned when the object is outside On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:16 PM Marc Gemis wrote: > > Brian, > > I looked at > https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?osmtype=R=10993573=boundary > Normally this allows me to

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] gestion du cycle de vie des infos [était: Profusion de clés covid19]

Même sans API OSM pour le faire, il y a moyen de développer des outils qui vont fouiller les évolutions "tag par tag" pour voir ce qui est réellement changé : la valeur du tag (modification, ajout ou suppression) ou la géométrie. De tels outils peuvent se spécialiser par domaine (liste thématique

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Sorry, I sent this mail only to Dave, sending it to the list for reference too. > -It is a current, valid tag that's more detailed, clear, precise & more > popular than PTv2 equivalent. That needs 100 other tags in other tagging families to make any sense, and hence helps to clutter up the

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

On 28.04.2020 14:44, Florian Lohoff wrote: > Nachdem ich dann die neue grünen teil mit lanes=1 > versehen habe ist soeben die route zurück geschwenkt. Entspricht denn lanes=1 der Realität? Also der Verkehr in beiden Richtungen teilt sich eine Spur? tom

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Libraires et takeaway

Bonjour, 28 avril 2020 10:58 "Marc M." a écrit: > takeaway indique que tu emportes au lieu de "consommer" sur place. > donc à priori je ne vois pas ce qui empêche de généraliser à un service > non-alimentaire, c'est même une bonne idée de généraliser. > > Mais takeaway=yes est à mon avis par

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 28.04.2020 14:44, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Nachdem ich dann die neue grünen teil mit lanes=1 > > versehen habe ist soeben die route zurück geschwenkt. > > Entspricht denn lanes=1 der Realität? > Also der Verkehr in beiden

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Good stuff Brian. Just looking at Cork Airport, it appears that when overpass looks for Civil parishes inside area["name"="Diocese of Cloyne"] it includes Cork Airport civil parish for some reason. This may be a limitation of how overpass or underlying technologies calculate geospatial queries -

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Because the discussion of this thread already ran into the direction of changing different aspects about the tagging, I used it for the general discussion. If we refine the buses, it could go hand in hand with everything else. I’d be interested in which refinements would be needed there as part

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:12:30PM +0200, Volker Schmidt wrote: > Beispiele? Das war der Schwenk heute morgen. Grün ist neu. Da wird dann der vermeindliche Autofahrer durch eher den Outback geschickt bzw durch die Siedlung (maxspeed=30). Da hatte jemand den dem neuen Grünen teil am westlichen

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

On 28/04/2020 08:45, Robin Däneke wrote: Hello everybody, I have lately been thinking about somehow reworking (or giving a new push to) the current p_t:v2 scheme. Especially for the fact, that, since it was first proposed and accepted, not a lot has changed in which tags are rendered, how

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Excuse me, I am a bit lost on how refining bus stop/station/platform tags will help resolving the issue of making bus route tagging more specific, and differentiate between different rype of bus services, which is the topic of this email thread? 在 2020年4月28日週二 15:45，Robin Däneke 寫道： > Hello

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] attribution manquante

Le 28/04/2020 à 13:55, Philippe Verdy - ver...@gmail.com a écrit : Il serait bon que les tiers intervenants pour les sites de l'Education nationales s'engagent avec une charte contractuelle les obligeant à maintenir après livraison les défauts et la conformité légale des sites (les attributions

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Libraires et takeaway

28 avril 2020 11:18 "leni" a écrit: > ce serait donc takeaway:covid19=only et reservation:covid19=required > puisque le reste du temps tu n'as pas besoin de réserver Je m'en sors avec : - opening_hours:covid19=open : un service est proposé - access:covid19=no : il faut commander avant de se

[talk-cz] Online mapathon MissingMaps

Zdravím ve spolek, již za něco málo přes hodinu máte další příležitost zúčastnit se mapathonu Missing Maps. Začátek dnes v 18.00. Připojit se je možné přes https://bluejeans.com/6911373877, kde zadáte Meeting ID 691 137 3877, bez hesla, instalace není nutná. Další informace najdete na OSM wiki:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Faut-il dissuader :?==?utf-8?q? addr:city La Ronze addr:postcode ddlll

On dirait que "ddlll" vient de l'explication d'un prof qui a dit qu'on devait utiliser le format "ddlll" pour le code postal et ça a été appliqué "à la lettre" par un élève "consciencieux" qui n'a pas réellement compris la directive donnée. Quant à "Aszerr", ça ressemble un peu à n'importe quoi,

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

John, All civil parishes show if you run boundary=civil_parish in Overpass. On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 13:04, John Kennedy wrote: > Cool. Yep, I was lucky spotted the difference description: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Difference > > Brian, I just noticed that

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] gestion du cycle de vie des infos [était: Profusion de clés covid19]

Bonjour Stuart, Le 26.04.20 à 10:36, European Water Project a écrit : > c'est probablement possible d'ajouter ce metadata sur les tags > assez facilement sans besoin d'attendre la nouvelle API sans attendre, il y a key:date par exemple drink_water:date mais ce n'est pas une meta. Je ne vois

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:57:51PM +0200, Volker Schmidt wrote: > lanes=1 ohne oneway=no|yes wird von einigen (auch von mir als moeglicher > Fehler) betrachtet, und ist daher keine gute Idee. Warum? Woher nimmst du diese Erkenntnis? Gibts in irgendeinem Wiki Artikel was zu? Das wäre mir völlig

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

Hi everyone Thanks Richard for the huge effort you've put into this ( and Martin) . I'm happy to help with any manual editing as long as the data is ready-to-go in JOSM. I think that this is such a vote of confidence in OSM by TfL - and such a potential global case study - that it warrants a big

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Why is Billy parish in Antrim shown as in Athlone Municipal District?

It seems that Nominatim is assigning the island of Ireland as the "parent" of a lot of parishes and similar boundary relations. Note that it is the first address item that appears on the details page that Marc linked to. See the full list in the Parent Of section here:

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

Also vielleicht verstehe ich das ganze access-Zeug falsch, aber sollte nicht "motor_vehicle" nur den access für eben diese motorisierten Gefährte einschränken? Und sonst die Standartwerte gelten (also foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes usw.) Bin hier gerade etwas verwirrt ob der Aussage, vielleicht

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

On 28.04.2020 17:35, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >> Entspricht denn lanes=1 der Realität? >> Also der Verkehr in beiden Richtungen teilt sich eine Spur? > > Wenn du aneinander vorbei möchtest muss einer auf die Bankette - ja - > Mindest

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Presse Locale][Ca Urge] Ça reste ouvert :

Monaco a sa communauté locale très largement liée aux services en France, et a de nombreux travailleurs transfrontaliers, venant la plupart de France (car Monaco ne peut pas les loger) ou sinon de l'Italie toute proche, y compris des personnes monégasques résidant en France ou Italie. De plus la

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

在 2020年4月28日週二 20:45，Robin Däneke 寫道： > Because the discussion of this thread already ran into the direction of > changing different aspects about the tagging, I used it for the general > discussion. If we refine the buses, it could go hand in hand with > everything else. I’d be interested in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Libraires et takeaway

Bonjour, Le 28.04.20 à 16:22, Frantz a écrit : > Que pensez-vous de distinguer avec pickup, déjà utilisé pour les colis : > - takeaway : achat sur place d'un produit emporté > - pickup : uniquement retrait d'un produit (sans achat sur place) veux-tu dire qu'une pizzeria qui propose de commander

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Hello Robin, I highly agree with you. The main reason for PTv2 not having as widespread adoption as it could have is that it is not rendered, that is to say, it is not rendered on OSM_carto (Osmand's rendering of PTv2 is near-perfect). However, we're stuck with a rendering "committee" that

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

Ich war vielleicht zu stenografisch. access=designated funktioniert anders. siehe Wiki: access=designated und Key motorcar. Mit anderen Worten motor_vehicle=designated "produziert" die

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Presse Locale][Ca Urge] Ça reste ouvert :

Bref, exiger une communauté locale à Monaco est sans doute trop: cette communauté est forcément extrêmement réduite, voire inexistante, composée en fait de contributeurs qui y vont souvent mais sont en fait logés ailleurs (Le Cap d'Ail ou Roquebrune-Cap-Martin pour les plus aisés sur la côte,

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

I have long ago proposed an addition to the PTv2 "route" schedule, which is the "formula" tag. Formula's would be defined within a network (or within a nation). For example, in the Netherlands, almost every transport network has so-called "buurtbus", litterally "neighbourhood bus" although

[OSM-talk-fr] "Catastrophe d'Haïti: déjà 10 ans"

OSM s'est beaucoup fait connaitre à l'occasion de la catastrophe du tremblement de terre en Haïti. C'était en 2010. Déjà 10 ans. Un anniversaire un peu passé à la trappe avec le COVID-19, et non pas à célébrer mais à considérer : OSM a-t-il fait de réels progrès ou permis de réelles avancées

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Libraires et takeaway

Le 28/04/2020 à 10:58, Marc M. a écrit : Bonjour, Le 28.04.20 à 10:41, leni a écrit : Les libraires sont également fermés, mais il y en a certains qui prennent les commandes et on peut venir chercher les livres devant la librairie (certains parlent de drive piéton:-P)  le wiki n'indique

Re: [talk-cz] jak mapovat chodníky

wow, to je věcička... :) to by se hodilo jako zajímavá systémová vrstva do osmap.cz - hned je vidět, kde jsou chyby a nesmysly, které není možné identifikovat, když to žádný (běžně užívaný) renderer nevykreslí... vop -- Původní e-mail -- Od: majkaz Předmět: Re: [talk-cz]

Re: [talk-cz] jak mapovat chodníky

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 11:29, Petr Vozdecký wrote: > (...) hned je vidět, (...) > Poznámka: 100 % map vytvořených nad daty OSM by bylo užitečnějších s legendou. H. ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

For years and years we have tried to convince the people working on carto, our default rendering to start supporting public_transport=platform/bus=yes instead of highway=bus_stop. They have clearly stated that this will never happen. Conclusion: highway=bus_stop is NOT a legacy tag. That's my

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Presse Locale][Ca Urge] Ça reste ouvert :

Bonjour, La stratégie adoptée est que ce sont les communautés locales des différents pays qui sont porteurs de l'initiative, donc tant qu'une communauté locale ne se manifeste pas, pas d'ouverture de "Ça reste ouvert" dans un pays. L'idée étant qu'il faut du monde pour traduire, animer,

[talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

Hi, The JOSM map imagery for Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) is generating errors and not loading. I have been trying to repair damage done by a new mapper to things sourced from this imagery. Unfortunately the reversion is not repairing the damage on selected ways.

Re: [talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

Hi there, checking the contributors page, Vicmap datasets are CC-BY 4.0 with waiver. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Vicmap_CCBYPermission_OSM_Final_Jan2018_Ltr.pdf On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:38, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:28 PM Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> I

Re: [talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

Yep that's fine, but that's for the Vicmap downloadable data, I didn't realise until now there was a WMS service that was open to the public and available under the same terms. On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 20:35, Bren Barnes wrote: > Hi there, checking the contributors page, Vicmap datasets are CC-BY

Re: [Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

Beispiele? Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

I like node highway=bus_stop for the reasons polyglot gives. bus_stop is here to stay cos there are too many to change, by the side of the highway they give directionality depending on the customary side of the road for driving. public_transport=platform works well for train and some trams.

[OSM-talk-ie] Why is Billy parish in Antrim shown as in Athlone Municipal District?

During the stay at home I have added many CofI parishes to OSM based on single or combinations of civil parishes. Please see Billy Parish 10993573, it suggests it is in County Roscommon!! This applies to a number of others as well. Please can somebody explain why to me and also how or who can

[Talk-de] Gewichtung der Straßen im Routing

Hi, ich habe gerade wieder so zeugs repariert wo jemand im Aussenbereich auf Straßen die eher zur Erschließung der Streusiedlungen gedacht sind mit einem maxspeed=100 bedacht hat. Natürlich ist das rechtlich richtig aber leider völlig an der Realität vorbei. Das hat natürlich sofort dazu geführt

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Hi Brian. Does this work? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TnN I attempt to gather all CPs in Cork. Then all CPs in the mapped dioceses. Then take the difference. But I just query by area name - this could be tightened further. Rgds/ - John On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 09:20, Brian Hollinshead

Re: [talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

Would you check to see if it's now pointing at the right layer. You'll have to refresh the list of imagery in JOSM to update first. It doesn't seem to have labels but, as I've never used this layer before, I don't know if it should. On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:58 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>

Re: [talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:28 PM Andrew Harvey wrote: > I was not aware we had permission to use this service, we have permission > to use the data, but I didn't know the API endpoint was for public use. It > looks like the service is down, we could ask the vicmap people if we can > use this

[OSM-talk-fr] #caresteouvert - Libraires

Bonjour Les libraires sont également fermés, mais il y en a certains qui prennent les commandes et on peut venir chercher les livres devant la librairie (certains parlent de drive piéton:-P)  le wiki n'indique *takeaway *que pour la nourriture, peut-on l'utiliser pour les livres ? leni

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

The basic objection they voice is why need 2 tags, if 1 does the job. highway=bus_stop is not exactly nonsensical. It's concise and expresses what is meant. (OK, it's not a highway and my preference is to map it next to the highway) public_transport=platform was designed at first to not need

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Hi Donal, Thanks for having a go at that overpass query. Your offer showed the Diocese of Ardfert which has perhaps six Cork civil parishes. I had not included it in my enquiry for fear of complicating it further. If you run overpass, include all County Cork on screen and use wizard:

Re: [talk-au] Vicmap Lite - Public Land (Parks and Reserves) not working

This was added by an annonymous user in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Australia?sfp_email=_mail==diff=47_version=46_email=_mail= I was not aware we had permission to use this service, we have permission to use the data, but I didn't know the API endpoint was for public use. It looks

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Libraires et takeaway

Bonjour, Le 28.04.20 à 10:41, leni a écrit : > Les libraires sont également fermés, mais il y en a certains qui > prennent les commandes et on peut venir chercher les livres devant la > librairie (certains parlent de drive piéton:-P)  le wiki n'indique > *takeaway *que pour la nourriture, peut-on

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Any tag we could come up with is going to be a partial misnomer for what we are trying to model in the Database. In OSM, there are lots of those… highway=bus_stop on the side of the road is somewhat trivially understandable, but that means we need railway=tram_stop, railway=train_stop,

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Took a look and looks sane to me. I was trying this last night but failing!  On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 12:30 John Kennedy, wrote: > Hi Brian. > Does this work? > > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TnN > > I attempt to gather all CPs in Cork. > Then all CPs in the mapped dioceses. > Then take the

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Hi John, That is great thank you. It does include the four parishes from Diocese of Ardfert but I can cope the that. I did not want all the Cloyne Parishes in Cork County lest there would be duplicate names. Regards On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:30, John Kennedy wrote: > Hi Brian. > Does this

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] attribution manquante

J'ai déjà contacté l'Education nationale concernant les cartes affichées sur leurs sites. Ils m'ont répondu que c'était une erreur d'interprétation des conditions mais que la correction allait venir bientôt, mais qu'ils sont très occupés avec beaucoup de travail à faire sur des tas de nouveaux

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

Cool. Yep, I was lucky spotted the difference description: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Difference Brian, I just noticed that Cork Airport and nearby are not highlighted in the results...maybe the civil parish definitions are missing/broken in those areas. Rgds/ -