Re: fixed 3.0

Hello Maxim, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:09:21 AM, you wrote: MM> hardware authentication and biometrics Is there an option NOT to use these? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! Version 2.12.03 MyMacros 1.11 Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service P

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Maxim, MM> The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work. If we weren't released The MM> Bat! since 2.0 the list had been quite impressive. Buy paying for 3.0 the users MM> get the whole bunch of new things that will be appear in The Bat! 3.xx in future. Unfortunately, what their money ge

Re[2]: fixed 3.0

Hello Paul, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 you wrote in PC> does that fix the 1/2 icon issues??? care to share them??? All work fine for me. Rather than pester the whole group with a download they don't want I'll mail them to your private address. -- Regards, Richard | Using The

Filters not working

Hello tbbeta, I have just installed a fresh copy of V3 home and I am remaking my filters as messages arrive (Using NFS) . One refuses to work. 8< TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [7605AD46.01C48F72.31F116DF.008

Re[2]: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello. DH> Hello Martin! DH> On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 10:15:13 PM you wrote: >> Are you really sure? How many persons? DH> Three for sure; I guess 5 to 6 all in all. They are called developers DH> (and this I mean serious, not as a snide comment). Val is one of them, DH> and I think he is

Continous download of same files

Hello, I noticed with Version 3 that I don't see the deleted files action going on in the control center. I can repeatedly hit the download email button and the same files will download over again... The strange part is when I check to see if I'm getting duplicates, I may get two or 3

Int Lang Pack

Hello All, This is a new install of V3 home. One of my pet hates is US english, there is no such thing. So one of the first things that I do is get English and that is all I want to install. In the MSI installer you have to choose not to install other languages, I much preferred the old way. You

Re: fixed 3.0

Hello Wolffe! On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 4:25:18 AM you wrote: > I loaded thebat_home.msi and used custom install. It did not prompt > for where to install. Apparently, it assumes you want to install in > same location as original. In custom mode you got the choices of what > to install b

Re: Pictures on headers

Hello Tim! On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 4:55:47 AM you wrote: > Really you use an EMail product for pictures in the header area, > I use it to work a large volume of EMail. Don't see how these two objectives are mutually exclusive. How come you have the Roguemoticons in your installation?

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello Jan! On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 3:56:22 AM you wrote: > Please explain something to me. Except for new & fancy glyphs, > what are the exact changes between beta/8 with MSI & v3 with MSI > installation? I'd say they fixed the uninstall/reinstall problem in the MSI. -- Dier

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello Jurgen! On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 7:12:36 AM you wrote: > You by a license and it's good for the version being out at that > time PLUS (now Ritlabs watch this): the next MAJOR version. Since 4.x the license is good for one major version, and the version numbering system - although

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Tim! On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 at 1:22:11 AM you wrote: > but it's future and my money spend in the future is predictable in > contrast to TB. Dood one. How do you know the future of TB is bleak, and Thunderbird's is bright? -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0 o

Re[2]: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello. HOME: -TB files -tips of the day -help file -smiley images -bayesit PRO: -TB files -tips of the day -help file -smiley images -bayesit -MUI -spell checker dictionaries: *british english *american english *dutch *french *german (new) *german (old) *italian *norwegian *span

RE:The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello Doug, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 10:27:01 PM, you wrote: > Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:03:06 PM, you wrote: > [SNIP] Dierk>> Trillian and Opera (more or less) use the Dierk>> One-Year-Subscription, most take the Major-Upgrade-Route. > I think Opera 7.0 was a major change from 6, and 7.5 a

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Maxim, > The Bat! 3.0 version is due to be released on September 1, 2004. No comment... > Beta testers How do you define this category of TB! users? Are they readers of this list? Or have they an account in the BT? Or need I a shirt with a TB! Beta-Tester print on it? Regards Dirk -- S

Re: fixed 3.0

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 @ 3:18:27 PM [-0700], MAU wrote: >> At least I can use my own glyphs. > Are you sure about that? If I can use my own glyphs.bmp I may give > it a try. My own glyphs also work with the latest .msi installation... -- Matt

Re[2]: fixed 3.0

Hello Martin, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 0:37:36, you wrote: >>For the avoidance of doubt, please confirm that the Personal (home) >>edition is the same fully featured version of TB! we enjoy now. Yes, it is the same. Professional version features hardware authentication and biometrics in additi

Re[2]: Pictures on headers

Hello Tim, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 7:55:47 PM, you wrote: > Very nice now I have what looks like a pen or something and a > question mark. ugggh I think that means the message has a pgp sig. -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600

Problems in last MSI version (was: Re: fixed 3.0)

Hello all, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > thebat_professional.msi is currently thebat_home.msi plus the > language files from the International Pack. - when I started this version and created new account, file ACCOUNT.SRX was created and when I opened Sorting

Re: fixed 3.0

Hello MAU, on Wednesday, 1. September 2004, at 01:48:12 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding "fixed 3.0": > As I said in my , I don't > know. Mine just work. Just copy the file 'glyphs.bmp' into the The Bat! main folder and activate in the 'Preferences - General ' the option 'H

Re: B8: Font colour changes for IMAP folders

Hello Martin, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 6:15:03 PM, you wrote: G>> Postfix is a MTA (mail transfer agent, mail server if you will), and is not G>> an IMAP server. Postfix does not set up the above. M> Yes, Postfix delivers to /var/mail (local delivery) and UW does M> the rest... right ;) Actual

Re: fixed 3.0

Hello Paul, > maybe I should put back the glyphs.bmp now that I have the final version > installed.. It sure doesn't work without the glyphs.bmp ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current

Re: Pictures on headers

Hello Paul, On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 4:27:27 PM you wrote: > I DO ! Really you use an EMail product for pictures in the header area, I use it to work a large volume of EMail. I guess to each his own. Very nice now I have what looks like a pen or something and a question mark. ugggh --

Re: fixed 3.0

Hello Paul, > but how DO I get the glyphs to work!! As I said in my , I don't know. Mine just work. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current beta is 3.00 Beta/1 | 'Usi

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hi, Maxim Masiutin wrote on 08/31/2004 09:01 PM: Beta testers and the privilege category (students, non-commercial > organisations, disabled persons, etc.) will receive a 30% discount > for either package. This discount is also valid for upgrading to > the version 3 from earlier versions of The Bat

Re: Pictures on headers

Hello Zeynel, On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 4:25:09 PM you wrote: > Right click on headers area, click sender photo, uncheck "display > sender". Thanks very much -- Tim Casten,ZDC National Air Traffic Controllers Association Current

Re: fixed 3.0

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 7:34 PM, you wrote: M> The tabs were introduce in 3.0 beta/1 but I guess they have removed M> them. ah, I might not have checked preferences, that beta wasn't out long enough :) M>>> And nice I can use my beloved glyph.bmp >> >> I renamed the glyph.bmp to something

Re[2]: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 3:32:29 PM, Jurgen Haug wrote: >> Tschuldigung aber das musste man raus - FICKEN! JH> apart from the last word I can agree to that I don't exactly understand the last sentence, but, I guess, he is right! :D -- Best regards, Borisma

TB! 3.0 Beta discount

Unless I've missed something, I haven't been able to find out how to get the extra %30 off discount as a beta tester anywhere on RitLabs site. -- Mike Using The Bat! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Re: fixed 3.0

Hello Paul, M>> BTW, nice to see the tabs in Preferences are gone :) > > what tabs?? oh, never mind!! The tabs were introduce in 3.0 beta/1 but I guess they have removed them. M>> And nice I can use my beloved glyph.bmp > > I renamed the glyph.bmp to something else, and now the original glyphs

Re: fixed 3.0

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 7:26 PM, you wrote: >>> I now have entries in the Control Panel for The Bat!, The Bat! >>> (Professional Edition) and The Bat! International Pack. TM>> not confirmed. Which System? MWoT> XP Professional SP2... the International Pack uninstalled fine by itself MWoT>

Re: Version 3.0 storm

Thanks Ritlabs! You just helped me to decide what will be my next step... I was already strongly hesitating about moving all my mail accounts (especially the IMAP ones) over to Thunderbird, but now I know : there is no TheBat! "upgrade" for me anymore. I have already paid for a V2 release when 1.

Re: fixed 3.0

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 7:20 PM, you wrote: >> what is ATM??? M> At The Moment :) and now I forget the question! ah well, I thought it had to do with truetypes, or icons.. not to worry:) but how DO I get the glyphs to work!! -- Paul Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Servic

Re: fixed 3.0

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, at 11:32:07 PM, time seemed to stop as Maxim Masiutin uttered these words: > Could you please test the fixed 3.0 MSIs: Not until someone explains the outrageous v3 situation. -- |\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ | \/ | /\ > < \~/ >

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Giamma! Just now (on 08/31/2004 at 22:39) you meant: > a 50+30% discount, is: 100*0.5*0.7=35 (65%discount) But when is a person a beta-tester and can get discount? -- Adios, Carsten www.batworld.de www.batboard.de Current b

fixed 3.0

Hello Tbbeta, Could you please test the fixed 3.0 MSIs: http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_home.msi http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi Both MSIs have the same .EXE. thebat_professional.msi is currently thebat_home.msi plus the language file

Re: Version 3.0 storm

Hello MaXxX, On 31 August 2004, 21:38 +0200 (20:38 local time) MaXxX [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: M> I myself am just inches away from starting a counter-project, some M> "freeBat" or something, under GPL, just to poke RITlabs' eyes out. ...and you could call it Mozilla Thunderbird or T

Re: Lack of Response

Hello JARDAY, > I'm not asking RIT for miracles. I'm just asking for reason-- for some > common courtesy. That's the keyword, "courtesy". I don't mind paying for an upgrade or even a yearly fee as, after all, TB does help me quite a bit to be more productive in my work. So, it is not the amount

Re: Prompt for deleting SRB file

Hello Marek, > new filtering system uses new file ACCOUNT.SRB for storing data, old > data from ACCOUNT.SRX are automatically converted at start. But as I > discovered in some accounts, I had files ACCOUNT.SRB already created > in April. Please add confirmation dialog, which will inform user about

RE:The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Kevin, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 9:55:06 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 22:01:35 [GMT +0300] (which was 12:01 PM where > I live) you wrote: >> The Bat! 3.0 version is due to be released on September 1, 2004. > > Wow, you guys are in serious need of some serious marketing and >

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello Dierk, Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:30:45 +0200 UTC Dierk Haasis wrote in message : DH> Neither. It's sensible. Why is it sensible talking about pricing, a schedule and whatnot of a /next/ major version when the /current/ version is full of bugs? -- Regards, Charles. The B

Ticker still has problems

Hello All, Just to say that the ticker still has problems, All messages read in The Bat! but the ticker is still going. Please fix. -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.00 Beta/1 |

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hi Dierk, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:03:06 PM, you wrote: [SNIP] Dierk> Trillian and Opera (more or less) use the Dierk> One-Year-Subscription, most take the Major-Upgrade-Route. I think Opera 7.0 was a major change from 6, and 7.5 a pretty good upgrade. And of course there's a free version, s

RE:The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Carsten, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 9:40:42 PM, you wrote: >> Within 3 months (September 1, 2004 through December 1, 2004) registered >> users of The Bat! version 1 and 2 will have the possibility to purchase The >> Bat! version 3 with a 50% discount regardless of the amount or the type of t

RE:Version 3.0 storm

Hello Dierk, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 9:39:59 PM, you wrote: > On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 9:23:16 PM you wrote: >> and they are all up in their arms (and 'they' is not a few) > Sorry, but ... > IME Germans are always the loudest to complain. And folks in Internet > forums are also of the

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello Charles! On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 10:07:30 PM you wrote: > Oh, nice and polite. Neither. It's sensible. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request A great truth is

RE:Version 3.0 storm

Hello MaXxX, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 9:38:13 PM, you wrote: > On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, at 9:23:16 PM, fear chilled people's > souls as Jurgen Haug whispered in a sinister voice: >> This so-called v3 is nothing but v1.8 in disguise, guys! 50% off for >> me? Why only 50? I am still waiting

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hi MAU, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:09:55 PM, you wrote: MAU> Hello Doug, >> Does anyone know if there a quick guide on how to use these as a Watch >> feature for mailing lists? MAU> OK, here is what I did to set up a Watch for TBBeta. Thanks, that was easy once you made it so clear! Now any

V3

Hello tbbeta, Well what a suprise! We wait for almost 2 years from the announcement of V2 to it arriving, them we get a V3 with out any prior warning with in a year (Ok I could be wrong). I have just got a replacement Lappy so I decided to put V2 on it with a fresh install. First thing that I no

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Maxim Masiutin wrote: Within 3 months (September 1, 2004 through December 1, 2004) registered users of The Bat! version 1 and 2 will have the possibility to purchase The Bat! version 3 with a 50% discount regardless of the amount or the type of the licences bought before. I bought version 2 on M

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Maxim Masiutin wrote: The Bat! 3.0 version is due to be released on September 1, 2004. I'll pass on the upgrade. IMAP still doesn't work properly in the last official release (spontaneous TB shutdowns, numerous exception errors, flaky filtering, flaky syncing). I certainly can't justify paying f

Re: B8: Font colour changes for IMAP folders

On Monday, August 30, 2004, 9Val wrote... > Hello Peter, PF>> See attached image. The font colour changes on my IMAP folders now and PF>> again. First I thought it was when new mail was being fetched but it PF>> appears to happen randomly. > Grayed are folders which are not selectable. S

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Marcus Ohlström on Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 8:19:19 PM, you scribed: > On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 21:01, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >> The Bat! 3.0 version is due to be released on September 1, 2004. > Please don't. 3.0 Beta/1 is far from stable, even if you have > developed further since releasi

Re: Lack of Response

Dierk Haasis wrote: It's hardly our obligation to give -them- a break. We're the PAYING end users. 1. The do need time to sort the complains out. That's a fact of physics. The complaints are a direct result of 2 missing factors: foresight and hindsight. They appear to have neither, which lend

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Maxim, On 31-08-2004 21:01, you [MM] wrote in : MM> Within 3 months (September 1, 2004 through December 1, 2004) MM> registered users of The Bat! version 1 and 2 will have the MM> possibility to purchase The Bat! version 3 with a 50% discount MM> regardless of the amount or

Re: The Bat! v3 pricing and availability info

Hello Martin! On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 at 9:43:58 PM you wrote: > Sorry this I didn't understand... Just because TB still has a public beta cycle doesn't mean it is the only one. I am 100%-sure (actually I know it) that RL beta-tests in house. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept Th

Re: Lack of Response

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It will be interesting to see if the press that has given so much positive coverage to TB! will report what RitLabs is doing here and the strength of feeling their actions have generated. I wouldn't mind being a fly on the wall at the next monthly sale

Re: Lack of Response

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Before people get _really_ annoyed at Ritlabs, they should respond on PF> this list. I fear it may be too late for that. However, a timely and meaningful response could put out a lot of fires right now. - -- :Stuart_Hemming: Using The Bat! v2.13

Re: Lack of Response

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred> Come on guys, we should give them some some time to collect all complaints, Fred> remarks, suggestions etc. and to come back to this issue? Version 3.0 is Fred> only one day active! TBH I don't expect them to respond, they didn't when a similar

Re: Lack of Response

Hello Fred, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Fred mused about "Lack of Response" (at least in part): F> Come on guys, we should give them some some time to collect all complaints, F> remarks, suggestions etc. and to come back to this issue? Version 3.0 is F> only one day active! The reality is, if they wer

Re: Lack of Response

Fred wrote: Come on guys, we should give them some some time to collect all complaints, remarks, suggestions etc. and to come back to this issue? Version 3.0 is only one day active! It's hardly our obligation to give -them- a break. We're the PAYING end users. If a matter is going to be contro

Re: Lack of Response

Come on guys, we should give them some some time to collect all complaints, remarks, suggestions etc. and to come back to this issue? Version 3.0 is only one day active! -- Regards, Fred -Original Message- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "TBBETA Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tu

Re: Lack of Response

Hello shemming, On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, shemming mused about "Lack of Response" (at least in part): sec> For what it's worth, I will not be upgrading unless there is a *major* sec> concession to those who have spend so much time and effort working on sec> the beta program. To call 3.x an upgra

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Roland Burger wrote: RvdH>> Some of us have been waiting for a full working IMAP version for a long RvdH>> time. Remember: it was promised for 2.0 (including Newsgroup support as RvdH>> well, if I remember correctly). yes, it was promised. As well as UNICODE was promised for version 2!!! There were

Re: Lack of Response

shemming, On 31-08-2004 16:11, you [sec] wrote in : sec> Given the huge amount of feedback to the change in version number sec> that there has been here over the last couple of days I'm both sec> surprised and dismayed at the lack of any sort of official comment sec> from Ri

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hi Mau, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 3:25:10 PM, you wrote: M> On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 @ 10:01:25 PM, MAU wrote: M> [snips] >>> Maxim> - chat virtual folders for watching conversation threads or >>> Maxim> waiting for replies to specific messages; >>> >>> Can't we get all the email bits to w

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hæ! Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 11:16, Roland Burger wrote: > As well as UNICODE was promised for version 2!!! I already said that... ;) -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media [The Bat! v2.12.03 (without BayesIt) & PopFile on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4]

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 @ 10:01:25 PM, MAU wrote: [snips] >> Maxim> - chat virtual folders for watching conversation threads or >> Maxim> waiting for replies to specific messages; >> >> Can't we get all the email bits to work properly before this >> ridiculous stuff? MAU> I don't agree. The

Re: Search result in thread ?

Marcus Ohlström wrote: > Not exactly what you want, but it might suite you. Mark a message in the > result list and select Specials | Follow. This takes you back to the > main window with focus on the message you just found. I didn't know about this one. ;) -- Allie Martin [List Moderator and F

Lack of Response

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Given the huge amount of feedback to the change in version number that there has been here over the last couple of days I'm both surprised and dismayed at the lack of any sort of official comment from RitLabs. The occasional snipe at a user's comments

Re: Search result in thread ?

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 16:04, Martin Schoch wrote: > Now I want to search for a specific message - well the "Message > search" is the tool. I give the word to search for and get a result in > the window "Message Finder" "Results". > But _now_ I would like that this found message is _marke

Re: IMAP: Purge & Compress

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, Allie Martin wrote... >> Since purge and compress seems to be such a big part of IMAP, should >> it not have a place on the Right click menu of a folder instead of >> just being under the Folder menu. Support for this would result in a >> request for the wish l

Re: MSI Installation

Hi Johannes! > Ye ;-) Especially if you have to uninstall an MSI-enabled beta to > install another MSI-enabled beta *g* Well, that won't happen anymore I guess... But here the WI mechanism is quite nice. If you update first all files are copied and if there are files deleted from the installa

Re: Search result in thread ?

Martin Schoch wrote: Hi tbbeta I have sorted the message list in TBBETA folder with threads. Now I want to search for a specific message - well the "Message search" is the tool. I give the word to search for and get a result in the window "Message Finder" "Results". But _now_ I would like that this

Re: Bat 3.0 Beta 1: Bug report

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:53:22 +0200GMT you wrote: DH> What drives me crazy is that sometimes TB changes my kezboard lazout DH> from German to US. I have to close TB and reopen it. DH> Just hit me with this message. I had this happen on my o

Re: Bat 3.0 Beta 1: Bug report

Hi Andreas, on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:06:48 +0200GMT you wrote: AS> Hello, AS> I get an access violation when clicking on Options/Preferences. AS> See here: www.andreas-schwartmann.de/bat.png AS> Anyone else? Not confirmed here on Win98. -- Cheers Peter The Bat!, version 3.0 Beta/1, Windows

Re: Mail dispatcher wish

Hello Peter, On 30 Aug 2004 at 20:58:38 +0200 GMT [20:58 CEST] you wrote: PM> The message was already marked as read by the notification, so I had to PM> select all headers. I wish I could have chosen to D/L only those of PM> today, because I don't delete messages on server with this computer (to

Re: Beta website

linu, On 31-08-2004 12:17, you [lpd] wrote in : lpd> Why not wait until RitLabs makes further announcements on upgrading lpd> procedures for version 3.0? I agree. I generally like TheBat! - but I'd like to see some feedback from Ritlabs very soon. What are they doing? They

Re: Beta website

Vilius Sumskas wrote: > My opinion about recent changes in The Bat! world, well... > I think MaXxX, Peter F. and others had said everything and I totally > agree with them. I have only 2 words more for Ritlabs: you suck. > I'm bailing out. Bye. There seems to be a lot of hasty decisionmaking g

Re: Incorrect icons in Connection Centre in 3.0 Beta/1

Hey Prezes! Just now (on 08/31/2004 at 12:16) you meant: > In Connection Centre icons are invalid. When I receive messages > there is icon of sending mesdsage, when I send message there is no > icon. confirmed -- Bye Bye, Carsten www.batworld.de www.batboard.de

Incorrect icons in Connection Centre in 3.0 Beta/1

Hello, In Connection Centre icons are invalid. When I receive messages there is icon of sending mesdsage, when I send message there is no icon. BT: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3468 -- Best regards, Prezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! v3.0 Be

Re[3]: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

hello all! MM> XP-themes API is a very perplexing one, like MAPI and many MM> other Microsoft APIs. It seemed that Microsoft is the only company MM> that manage to fully utilize this API in its programs. The Bat! is MM> an exception from this regularity. The Bat! looks under XP like MM> Microso

Re: Beta website

Hey MAU! Just now (on 08/31/2004 at 11:59) you elaborated: >> The problem is that Ritlabs nuked all registrations. > That is simply not true. I can still login with no problems. No problems here. -- Bye, Carsten www.batworld.de www.batboard.de

Re[4]: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

Hello, Kevin, Monday, August 30, 2004, you wrote: >> The Bat! 3.0 has taken the developers a year of work. If we weren't >> released The Bat! since 2.0 the list had been quite impressive. Buy >> paying for 3.0 the users get the whole bunch of new things that will be >> appear in The Bat! 3.xx in

Re: Beta website

Hello Vilius, > The problem is that Ritlabs nuked all registrations. That is simply not true. I can still login with no problems. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 Current beta is 3.00 Be

Re: Summary Upcoming release version: 2.13 "Lucky" Latest test build: 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/6 Summary Upcoming release version: 2.13 "Lucky" Latest test build: 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/6 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta outdated

Hello Martin, On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 you wrote: >> Yea, the 2.13-Beta8 is there too, but the Link is not there. >> Maybe the Webdsigners of RIT are vry slow. :D > And developers too fast when changing to 3.0 _during_ a beta cycle? > :-| Actually it's a lack of any management on that sid

Re: Beta website

I have try to log in on two different computer at 2 different location, still no access. Authorisation is ok but we have not tight to see anything else than things I describe in previous emails. -- In Flames Fan WebSite http://www.everdying.com Keep the flame burning ! > Hi Vilius > > On Tuesday

Re: Beta website

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 11:20, Vilius Sumskas wrote: >> I don't see any problems... >> >> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta > The problem is that Ritlabs nuked all registrations. No, they have not. I and others can still log in. Something is obviously wrong, but why assume Ritlabs is doing

Re: Beta website

Cituojama Martin Schoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi ArchY On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10:51:03 AM you wrote: Thx for answers! I don't see any problems... http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta The problem is that Ritlabs nuked all registrations. So now I get access denied error when trying to login. I can't

Re: The Bat! 3.0 beta 1

MM> XP-themes API is a very perplexing one, like MAPI and many other MM> Microsoft APIs. It seemed that Microsoft is the only company that MM> manage to fully utilize this API in its programs. The Bat! is an MM> exception from this regularity. The Bat! looks under XP like MM> Microsoft's Programs o

Re: Beta website

Hi ArchY! > I can't login to the bat beta download, my login still ok but I see > nothing... Did the address change or something like that ? > Thx for answers! Yeah, same problem here. I already tried to change the password, which worked. But I still cannot log in. Maybe I'm not longer wanted as