Hello Curtis,
On Sunday, August 06, 2000 at 10:45:46 GMT -0500 (which was 8:45 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 11:32:52 -0400, Cricket wrote:
C Wasn't somebody working on a plugin that will backup all of TB! for
C you? Think back to the days of beta 1.1x -
Hi Januk,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 00:00:05 -0700GMT (08/08/2000, 15:00 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA Speaking of such things...is anyone willing to host my 2kb batch file
JA for easy downloads by others? If so, please let me know offlist.
There is a free space for such things on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jason,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 06:12:04, you wrote:
BJ Hello Mark,
BJ Monday, August 07, 2000, 9:27:38 AM, you wrote:
JDB Point semi taken. I'll switch off PGP and leave S/Mime turned on. With
JDB people like you we need to be careful.
MA
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 08:08:12 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 15:08 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD Personally I believe that when on a public list where you may make
JD controversial decisions or flame people being able to certify who you
JD are is very necessary.
There is no flaming ion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 08:55:47, you wrote:
TF Especially, please do not blow your postings up to over 7K just
TF because of this S/Mime. Some people pay internet charges per
TF download time; this list is meant to assist people
SL PGP, GPG signatures are ok. But that travesty called S/MIME has got
SL to go! 2870 bytes to sign something far less than that!?
Yeah, the signatures are too long. Do they really have to be that
long to maintain the desired standard of authentication?
OTH, PGP 6.5.1.i is a 8.1mb
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:14:41 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 16:14 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD OK 6k as opposed to 2K. That's 4K extra, on a 56K modem that's 1
JD second extra download time.
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that
Hello TBUDL,
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, , Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MDP Pass. Many do. Some don't. I haven't researched it.
I receive a lot of message sent by Outlook. They don't seem to thread
by ref.
Let's see:
Those that support it:
The Bat! :)
Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data communication
Business Group ???
Not everybody lives in the UK, you know.
not in Taiwan either
Hi folks,
I found a mistake in the German translation. I normally use the
english version - but once switched to the German one.
When you want to choose the PGP-Version in English, you can choose
between different PGP implementations - and also the Version 6.x /
6.5.x.
But in the German Menue
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 09:51:38, you wrote:
TF Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100
TF postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra.
I actually made that point clear in my post and it has been snipped to
falsify my opinion and
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:20:10 GMTGMT (08/08/2000, 17:20 +0800GMT),
Rob wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data communication
R
DLDoes make you wonder if 6K is a bit big for a 5 line message ;)
While not a flame this is Des trying to drop me in it for dual
signing. Essentially this is more elegant than a flame, as it asks the
moderators to attack someone rather than the flamer attacking them.
Which, I might note, is
Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:11:13 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 17:11 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
TF Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100
TF postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra.
JD I actually made that point clear in my post and it has
Hi Jamie,
I own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
Hi there Thomas,
Am 08.08.2000 so gegen 05:28 meintest Du:
Well, not quite. While I don't pay online time while I'm in the office
(connected through the LAN), I have to pay per-minute when I am at
home. So, I do care if message are 6K instead of 2K big, especially on
mailing lists.
Oh come
Hi there Thomas,
Am 08.08.2000 so gegen 10:51 meintest Du:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes. I have a 56K
modem, but that does not mean that I actually get the data with that
speed.
Hey Thomas,
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 08/08/2000 at 10:39, you wrote:
I own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
Same people who bother to check the signatures ;)
Basically what TB needs is
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:39:41 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 17:39 +0800GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Hi Jamie,
TFI own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first
TF glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really
checks the headers?
ROTFLMAO!
--
Hi Johannes,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:00:57 +0200GMT (08/08/2000, 18:00 +0800GMT),
Johannes M. Posel wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per second on
a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes. I have a 56K
modem, but that does not mean that I actually get
Hello The Bat! users,
Windisch Gergely wrote:
WG Let's see:
WG Those that support it:
WG The Bat! :)
WG Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 (And newer)
WG Mozilla 4.51 (I think It's Netscape Messenger) (And newer)
WG Calypso Version 3.00.00.13 (2)
WG Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:48:05, you wrote:
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to me.
TF Please do not send S/Mime signatures. In this relase version which I
TF am using here in the office, and for which this list is anyway, your
TF certificate
Hi Ming-Li,
On 08 August 2000 at 18:33:18 GMT -0700 (which was 02:33 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of ""Huh? I don't own this mailing list!"":
Is there a way to switch off that feature in a particular folder to
reduce confusion? i.e. To
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:16:36, you wrote:
JMP There is a S/MIME 1.45 release...
TF You'll find it on the beta page ;-)
It hasn't got a beta suffix though.
--
Jamie Dainton
Tuesday, August 08, 2000 11:31:32
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
Windows 98 4.10
mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:48:05 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to me.
TF Please do not send S/Mime signatures. In this relase version which I
TF am using here in the office, and for which this list is anyway, your
TF certificate shows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:43:24, you wrote:
TF Hi Jamie,
TF On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:19:37 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 18:19 +0800GMT),
TF Jamie Dainton wrote:
TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing
TF
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 13:50:01 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF It's the way database files work. The "next" record (message B) can
TF have the exact same time stamp (as message A), but it was received
TF right after message A by your server, and therefore is the "next"
TF record. IOW it was
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 6:10 AM or thereabouts, Curtis wrote
the following about OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server
rules):
Curtis The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the
Curtis air. Is S/MIME signing of messages allowed or not? If it's
Curtis allowed
Hi Curtis,
On 08 August 2000 at 06:10:49 GMT -0500 (which was 12:10 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
C The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the air.
C Is S/MIME signing
Hi Jamie,
On 08 August 2000 at 11:19:37 GMT +0100 (which was 11:19 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to
TF me. Please do not
Hi Chuck,
On 08 August 2000 at 06:45:37 GMT -0500 (which was 12:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
CM ... I find it ironic how much bandwidth has been used to discuss
CM waste of
Hi Johannes,
JMP Oh come on! What do you use? ISDN? In times of flatrates at 80 DM, I
JMP can only laugh at discussions 'bout "your .sig is longer than 4 lines"
JMP and "2k vs 6k".
So you are a very privileged person. I consider your argument
arrogant and unpolite to those readers here, who are
Hi Thomas,
...
JD I do not think it is necessary to decrease our security to
JD accommodate the minority of users who have a very low bandwidth
JD connection.
TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing
TF list only for high-bandwidth privileged users?
Clearly NO.
I
1) Your Thawte certificate is *not* notorised and does *not* certify
that the mail comes from Jamie Dainton.
just out of curiosity ; i just downloaded PGP 6.5.1i, but as far as i remember -
i toyed with it in the DOS days - a PGP key also is not a 100% guarantee that
the sender is who he
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 06:45:37 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
CM Curtis The moderators need to step in here, I believe, and clear the
CM Curtis air. Is S/MIME signing of messages allowed or not? If it's
CM Curtis allowed then leave Jamie alone please. Simple. The above is
CM Curtis not an opinion but
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, Wolfgang Kynast wrote to Johannes M. Posel about
Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules):
JMP Oh come on! What do you use? ISDN? In times of flatrates at 80 DM, I
JMP can only laugh at discussions 'bout "your .sig is longer
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000 at 7:10 AM or thereabouts, Curtis wrote
the following about OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server
rules):
-- [snip] --8
CM Curtis what's the word moderators?
Curtis teasing We had better decide if quote prefixing like the
Curtis above is
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:17:26AM +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
Not really. S/MIME insists on including the entire certificate,
whilst the PGP version (key) has the nice friendly
download-it-manually method :)
You're joking, right? That has GOT to be a joke. Who the hell would make
a
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:45:12AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTH, PGP 6.5.1.i is a 8.1mb download (i just did) and needs 15mb of hard
disk space ...
a S/MIME certificate is a couple of 100 bytes and just imports into the
address book. just sayin' ... it all depends on wether you got
Hi Thomas Davide,
"Park whole thread" as an option. Sounds good. Doesn't exist yet,
though.
Right click on the message list, then choose "Thread | Park".
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1
--
--
View the
Hi Marck,
So I use a more exacting construct (as do many others here who
were around first time we had the conversation):
H, how come I've never noticed that? Oh, I got it. I've removed
the "To" field from my TBUDL/TBBETA folder, for "View thread by
reference" has made it easy enough
Hallo Ming-Li,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 06:50:38 -0700 GMT (08/08/2000, 21:50 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
ML Oops, one question: I currently put TBUDL and TBBETA in one folder.
ML Short of separating them into different folder, is there a way to
ML distinguish them?
If you do want to keep them in the
Hi Rob,
On 08 August 2000 at 12:26:37 GMT GMT (which was 13:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY
R you have a filter/macro/template that
Hi Ming-Li,
On 08 August 2000 at 06:50:38 GMT -0700 (which was 14:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of ""Huh? I don't own this mailing list!"":
ML I currently put TBUDL and TBBETA in one folder. Short of
ML separating them into different folder, is
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 1:26:37 PM, you wrote:
1) Your Thawte certificate is *not* notorised and does *not* certify
that the mail comes from Jamie Dainton.
R just out of curiosity ; i just downloaded PGP 6.5.1i, but as far as i remember -
R i toyed with it in the DOS days - a PGP key
PGP, GPG signatures are ok. But that travesty called S/MIME has got to
go! 2870 bytes to sign something far less than that!?
Yep :) Personally I'm not having a go at the people who use it
(doesn't look like you are either), especially since S/MIME support is
still early in TB and
Hi Thomas Rob,
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per
second on a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data
R communication Business Group ???
I'm wondering about that, too. I knew Chunghwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 7:43:48 AM, David wrote:
Anyone could forge a PGP key, if you manage to give fake details to
Thawte it says they can sue you for about 10,000 dollars or something
crazy.
No, noone can force a PGP key. If you think
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 08/08/2000 at 14:26, you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:17:26AM +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
Not really. S/MIME insists on including the entire certificate,
whilst the PGP version (key) has the nice friendly
download-it-manually method :)
You're joking, right?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 7:43:44 AM, David wrote:
would not only need to download that persons key to check their
signature, but you would also need to phone them or something, to
check if the key really belongs to them. How many people here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 8:20:58 AM, Deryk wrote:
I don't think Microsoft invented S/MIME (which would explain
everything as well) but they were certainly behind it a lot.
Certainly reason right there to ignore it. WTF was RIT thinking when
Hallo Ming-Li,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:30:19 -0700 GMT (08/08/2000, 22:30 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
Try again with varying speeds betwenn 200 baud and 1.7K per
second on a phone line that disconnects every couple of minutes.
R are connections _that_ bad at Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. Data
R
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 08/08/2000 at 16:31, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 8:20:58 AM, Deryk wrote:
I don't think Microsoft invented S/MIME (which would explain
everything as well) but they were certainly behind it a lot.
Certainly
Hi Marck,
ML I currently put TBUDL and TBBETA in one folder. Short of
ML separating them into different folder, is there a way to
ML distinguish them?
IOW - you may have asked the wrong person g.
Never mind. I figured it out--use address book template.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat!
Hello TheBat!,
In Internet Explorer (boo), there is an option to send the web page
you are viewing to someone via email. (Tools--Mail and News--Send
Page) You are then asked which profile to use, and Outlook express
(boo) seems to be set up to work automatically. There is, however,
an
Hello Deryk,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 5:42:34 PM, you wrote to Steve Lamb:
DL Hi Steve,
snip
Certainly reason right there to ignore it. WTF was RIT thinking when they
implemented it? That energy should have been put into a decent PGP
implementation.
I wholeheartedly agree.
DL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Curtis,
Monday, August 07, 2000, 11:13:59 PM, you wrote:
SL If there are any other PMMail people on here I'm sure they would
SL back me up in saying that the interface for PMMail was much more
SL slick and polished than TB!'s is. I'd love to
Hi Graham,
On Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 12:07 PM, you wrote in part about
"Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)":
G I disagree about PGP implementation: it seems to me that PGP
G messages should be seen to be the same in all e-mail clients, as
G though the client was invisible
Hallo Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 12:04:02 +0100 GMT (08/08/2000, 19:04 +0800 GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD I await your reply.
Sorry, I do owe you a reply. The thing was, I left the office, and by
the time I checked my email at home, the thread had been finished.
Should you wish to continue,
How does one use S/Mime in TheBat? I've got a certificate and have
exported it to TheBat directory but still don't seem able to use it.
--
Best regards,
Tonymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL
Hi,
I have two difficulties here:
1. In trying to type a text/layout like this,
---
4-4-4-4-4-4
---
WAKING UP
I can't make it work. Give it a try, following a logical
sequence, as you would in any text editor, namely: (a) type
in the hyphens for the first line, (b) press
Hello JM14,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, you wrote:
Hi,
I have two difficulties here:
1. In trying to type a text/layout like this,
---
4-4-4-4-4-4
---
WAKING UP
Try removing the check in Options | Editor Preferences | Auto-format
Regards,
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, you wrote:
%TO=""%TO="""%OFROMNAME on TBUDL"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]". This
I am lost ... where/how were you able to make this change?
Regards,
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL
Hello Terry.
August 08, 2000, 2:50:25 PM, you wrote:
I have two difficulties here:
1. In trying to type a text/layout like this,
---
4-4-4-4-4-4
---
WAKING UP
TGM Try removing the check in Options | Editor Preferences | Auto-format
Mirabile dictu! It *works.*
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:40:08 PM, JM14, wrote:
[...]
TGM Try removing the check in Options | Editor Preferences | Auto-format
J Mirabile dictu! It *works.* Lovely, elegant, in its simplicity.
J Thank you.
J Just what (JM asked sheepishly) does Auto-format do?
J (Besides driving me to
In Reference to "Two Format Questions" From Joe Finocchiaro:
J Whenever I copy something (e.g., text from a web site), it automatically
J goes to ClipMate first, and then I can very quickly and easily modify
J the text in ClipMate, even wrap the lines to, say, 70 characters, etc.
I gotta
Hi Terry,
On 08 August 2000 at 11:50:25 GMT -0700 (which was 19:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Two Format Questions":
1. In trying to type a text/layout like this,
---
4-4-4-4-4-4
---
WAKING UP
TGM Try removing the check
Hi Tony,
On 08 August 2000 at 18:50:29 GMT +0100 (which was 18:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Signing of Messages (Was: Re: List server rules)":
TG How does one use S/Mime in TheBat? I've got a certificate and have
TG exported it to TheBat
Hi Terry,
%TO=""%TO="""%OFROMNAME on TBUDL"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I am lost ... where/how were you able to make this change?
The reply template for either the folder where you store your TBUDL
mail or the address book entry for TBUDL.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k
Hello Steve,
Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 5:20:25 PM, you wrote:
SL On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 12:14:55AM +0800, icqman wrote:
do you by any chance know of any txt editor which can remove identical lines?
i have got a list of addresses which i joined from 5 other txts and it
came to some 5000 k
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 7:01:23 PM, you wrote:
TF Jason wrote:
J I have a customer that wishes to move all employees to the TB. This
J organization is currently using OE, Outlook, NS, and Internet Mail. I
J believe I have my exporting and importing work cut out for
Hi Terry,
On 08 August 2000 at 12:18:26 GMT -0700 (which was 20:18 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of ""Huh? I don't own this mailing list!"":
%TO=""%TO="""%OFROMNAME on TBUDL"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
This
TGM I am lost ... where/how were you able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 12:32:56 PM, Jamie wrote:
SL The GNU text utils would work wonders here.
SL type file | sort | uniq file.new
SL Sort will put them all in order and then uniq will return only a single
SL occurance of any
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:36:03 PM, Joe Finocchiaro, wrote:
JF Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:15:39 PM, Nick Danger, wrote:
ND In Reference to "Two Format Questions" From Joe Finocchiaro:
J Whenever I copy something (e.g., text from a web site), it automatically
J goes to ClipMate first, and
Hi Jamie Dainton,
On Wednesday, August 02, 2000 at 9:32:56 PM you wrote:
do you by any chance know of any txt editor which can remove identical lines?
i have got a list of addresses which i joined from 5 other txts and it
came to some 5000 k and about 4 identical lines of each
SL The
Hi Joe,
On 08 August 2000 at 15:51:20 GMT -0500 (which was 21:51 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Two Format Questions":
JF Moreover, on the supposition that those are the commands for
JF aligning text left, right, and center, they don't maintain
Hi JM14,
2. Importing (Pasting) word-wrapped text from a file created in
Notepad or any other equivalent results in the word-wrapping being
eliminated. Each paragraph pasted into TB message window is now a
single long unformatted, unwrapped line, needing to be
individually blocked and
Hi Jamie,
It's time to get your copy of C++ or Pascal out. Ultraedit won't
cut it and I've never used GNU text editing tools.
Ultraedit does this, easily.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1
--
--
Hi Terry,
I don't see anything that looks like
%TO="%OFROMNAME [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
which is what shows up on the TBUDL.
It's not in the template because that's the default (name taken from
the "From" field and address taken from the "Reply-To" field in the
header). That's why Marck's
In Reference to "Two Format Questions" From Joe Finocchiaro:
8 - - - - snipped for brevity and/or clarification - - - -
J Why should I have to hit anything to have the pasted text format
J correctly and precisely to my default? I think this is another one
J of those "quirks" that TB is
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 4:05:32 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone, wrote:
MDP Hi Joe,
MDP On 08 August 2000 at 15:51:20 GMT -0500 (which was 21:51 where I
MDP live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP of "Two Format Questions":
JF Moreover, on the supposition that those
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 4:30:51 PM, Nick Danger, wrote:
ND In Reference to "Two Format Questions" From Joe Finocchiaro:
ND 8 - - - - snipped for brevity and/or clarification - - - -
J Why should I have to hit anything to have the pasted text format
J correctly and precisely to my default?
Hello Nick,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 at 15:15:39 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
J Whenever I copy something (e.g., text from a web site), it
J automatically goes to ClipMate first, and then I can very quickly
J and easily modify the text in ClipMate, even wrap the lines to,
J say, 70 characters, etc.
ND I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:47:52 PM, Joe wrote:
Then, if you asked us again whether we would ever want TB to do this for
us automatically, and without the need for an external editor, the reply
would be "You betcha!
Not on your life.
In fact, UltraEdit will do this just fine, for what it's worth.
File-Sort-Advanced... set "ignore case" "remove duplicates" and
Bob's yer uncle. I'm with Mr. Steve Lamb - I have at least 3 ways of
doing this w/o resorting to compiler (and yes, I consider Java
"compiled").
File
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 4:58:51 PM, Steve Lamb, wrote:
SL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SL Hash: SHA1
SL Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:47:52 PM, Joe wrote:
Then, if you asked us again whether we would ever want TB to do this for
us automatically, and without the need for an external
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:51:38 PM, Leif wrote:
Try using ALT-L/C/R on this puppy!
Sure.
1. Only in America..can a pizza get to your house faster than an
ambulance.
2. Only in America..are there handicap parking places in front of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:15:46 PM, Steve wrote:
find \\S*
Fat fingered this, it should be \\s*. \s* should work also. \S means
non-whitespace where \s means whitespace. Bg difference.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:55:39 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
KP I'm just starting to play with TB after coming from PMMail, and one
KP thing that's hard to get used to is the action of the Next/Prev
KP buttons when at the end of a folder. With PMMail, the reading window
KP closes when moving off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:19:32 PM, Curtis wrote:
KP automatically close the window when the end of the list is reached?
Nope. This is just a difference in behaviour. Different clients.
For which TB! is wrong for the reasons outlined before.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 16:34:10 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
JF If you say so. But that command does *not* maintain paragraphs
JF either, which is extremely important to me.
Well, you either do another alt+j when finished with each paragraph or
use 'autoformat'.
MDP Also TB reformat will
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 17:10:57 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
snip
JF I want *my* pastes to conform with my written text -- call it
JF whatever you want to call it. Whether I type it in or paste it in, I
JF want it to all look the same -- automatically.
JF $.25 says the majority agrees?
There are
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 4:51:38 PM, Leif Gregory, wrote:
[...]
LG It's a very simple function of Clipmate to use. Take a gander at
LG their animated demo of the Text Clean-up function:
LG http://www.thornsoft.com/LeeLou/CleanUp_viewlet.html
You bet, it's virtually seamless.
LG I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:55:39 PM, Kenneth wrote:
I'm just starting to play with TB after coming from PMMail, and one
thing that's hard to get used to is the action of the Next/Prev
buttons when at the end of a folder.
You and me both.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 15:30:31 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
KP automatically close the window when the end of the list is
KP reached?
Nope. This is just a difference in behaviour. Different clients.
SL For which TB! is wrong for the reasons outlined before.
Are you familiar with the SHIFTCTRLG
Hi Curtis,
On 09 August 2000 at 18:07:47 GMT -0500 (which was 00:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Next/Prev action at end of list":
KP automatically close the window when the end of the list is
KP reached?
Nope. This is just a difference
Hello Andrew,
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 12:18:08 PM, you wrote:
Hello TheBat!,
In Internet Explorer (boo), there is an option to send the web page
you are viewing to someone via email. (Tools--Mail and News--Send
Page) You are then asked which profile to use, and Outlook express
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 5:29:37 PM, Steve Lamb, wrote:
SL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SL Hash: SHA1
SL Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:10:57 PM, Joe wrote:
I want my pastes to conform *precisely* with my usual written text format
(by default), and I still think the majority would agree
Hi Jamie,
On Wednesday 02/08/2000 at 20:32, you wrote:
SL The GNU text utils would work wonders here.
SL type file | sort | uniq file.new
snip
I've never used GNU text editing tools.
You don't know what you're missing :) I'm not Linux's no.1 fan anymore
(in some ways it's *very*
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 5:24:56 PM, Curtis, wrote:
C On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 16:34:10 -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
JF If you say so. But that command does *not* maintain paragraphs
JF either, which is extremely important to me.
C Well, you either do another alt+j when finished with each
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
