Hi Neal,
Wednesday, October 31, 2007, 4:46:08 AM, you wrote:
Is there a plugin available to use SpamAssassin seamlessly with TB!?
NL I don't think there is, but after trying many solutions,
NL AntiSpamSniper seems to do the job the best.
Ok, thanks.
--
Scott.
Hi, folks!
Is there a plugin available to use SpamAssassin seamlessly with TB!?
--
Scott.
Using The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000 on an AMD
Athlon XP 64 4000+ 2.4Ghz with 2GB.
Current version is 3.99.25 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hi PIXIE,
Monday, August 25, 2003, 5:41:37 AM, you wrote:
P My guess is that PGP is the favorite amongst most here yet I wanted to
P see if I can get an idea which I should explore first. A long time
P ago with IE like 2.0 or 3.0 I bought a verisign S/MIME key to fiddle
P with. MS cryptoAPI
Hi, all!
I've been able to open encrypted messages using my smart card, but so
far, have had no luck getting The Bat! to sign and encrypt messages.
Any suggestions, or is it not supported yet?
I'm using Microsoft CrytoAPI with ActivCard Gold Cryptographic Service
Provider. Using the internal
Hi Dan!
In message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, August 9, 2003, 8:05:15 AM, you wrote:
DG I am unfamiliar with mapi. I am a tinkerer, a cautious tinkerer, but
DG nevertheless a tinkerer. And I wonder,
DG1. What is mapi?
DG2. Are there any advantages and/or disadvantages to
Hi Samson!
In message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, August 11, 2003, 5:57:18 PM, you wrote:
DG Hello %ABOFromFirstName %ABOFromLastName
S this works perfectly. appreciate.
S i searched over the help file and macro list, couldn't find any
S references for these %AB* macros. any idea where
Hi Krister!
In message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, August 13, 2003, 6:25:58 AM, you wrote:
KE Wednesday, August 13, 2003, 8:37:33 AM, you wrote:
ESoV Right click on My Computer and ask for Properties, then click on
ESoV the tab, System Restore. Disable it there. Be sure to
ESoV
Hi Dan!
In message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, August 9, 2003, 8:39:47 AM, you wrote:
DG What effect will using TB's MAPI have on other programs, for example
DG (but perhaps not the only example) OE, if someone decides to run them?
DG What will happen if I update OE? Will I have to
Hi Melissa!
In message mid:5211301957.20021030005223;calarts.edu
on Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 2:52:23 AM, you wrote:
MR scanner. After all...if the program didn't catch something on its way
MR in, why would you expect it to catch it on the way out? :-)
Is your name Typhoid Mary? :)
--
Hi Joseph!
In message mid:17515278359.20021029181505;qwest.net
on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 6:15:05 PM, you wrote:
JN I am now on two mailing lists where the 'reply' button would send the
JN reply back to the author only. There are two ways to go with such
JN lists, one of which is to hit
Hi Anne!
In message mid:169130928287.20021030015858;gmx.co.uk
on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 7:58:58 PM, you wrote:
A This has me puzzled Chris - how can an AV on a local machine be
A scanning a file on a remote server before it's downloaded?
Usually the download is actually in progress while
Hi Adam!
In message mid:100101378504.20021029225353;fastmail.fm
on Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 8:23:53 PM, you wrote:
A I've never noticed what an uninstall will do with program files. I
A would have thought a Mail directory would be left alone. How would
A Windows know where to find it
Hi Paul!
In message mid:11959072812.20021028101746;pcartwright.com
on Monday, October 28, 2002, 9:17:46 AM, you wrote:
PC who has the latest, best-easiest method to import Outlook folders???
I just email them to myself; that way I get all the headers, aside
from the Received: headers, which
Hi Sudip!
In message mid:962967375.20021027095600;ntc.net.np
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 11:11:00 PM, you wrote:
VN Does anyone know if Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition can scan
VN mail received through TB?
SP NAV doesn't have plug-in for TB! But, it can be set up to scan
SP
Hi Jonathan!
In message mid:12151905962.20021026224406;certiflexdimension.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:44:06 PM, you wrote:
MainSet: 40Content-Type: multipart/alternative
JA Ewww... I get a whole load of emails each day from clients, and
JA friends that all use multipart/alternative
Hi Thomas!
In message mid:461061460.20021027105209;gmx.net
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:52:09 PM, you wrote:
TF The biggest part of the message may be the body; you can search for
TF signla strings in it. The lower headers are just a line or two. You
TF cannot search for signal string in
Hi Allie!
In message mid:88204631825.20021027164307;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 3:43:07 PM, you wrote:
S Although AVG catches the eircar.com virus attachment it failed
S to catch and quarantine any of the others.
ACM yawn ;) I really question the applicability of such
Hi Simon!
In message mid:15341266296.20021027233602;theycallmesimon.co.uk
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 5:36:02 PM, you wrote:
S I understand what you are saying, and of course why you logically question
S this, but I personally don't really want to go through a library of virii
S testing
Hi Vishal!
In message mid:731649081.20021027185246;myrealbox.com
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:52:46 PM, you wrote:
VN Thanks Scott. Are you sure about this though? And if it does, that
VN that mean that I don't need a corresponding dll to force TB to check
VN email from its end? I know NAV
Hi Allie!
In message mid:140215282529.20021027194038;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 6:40:38 PM, you wrote:
ACM For stopping harmless test files? I don't know how popular those
ACM test files are apart from eicar.com which is well known (note that
ACM eicar is picked up by most
Hi Allie!
In message mid:63222346407.20021027213828;landscreek.net
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 8:38:28 PM, you wrote:
S they are .com or .exe types. Generally speaking, even the most
S basic of user gets to grips with the dangers of running .com
S and .exe files, as they are commonplace
Hi Anne!
In message mid:142130087802.20021028030202;gmx.co.uk
on Sunday, October 27, 2002, 9:02:02 PM, you wrote:
A Interestingly enough Nod32 -which is another of the highly rated AV
A programs- doesn't detect the eicar test file, and when asked about
A this their response apparently was that
Hi Anne!
In message mid:13853237258.20021026112534;gmx.co.uk
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 5:25:34 AM, you wrote:
SM Yahoo and Topica are good
SM examples of these; you can read mail online or you can get it via
SM email or both. This would probably work quite well for everyone, if
SM you
Hi Anne!
In message mid:10954196255.20021026114133;gmx.co.uk
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 5:41:33 AM, you wrote:
A (1) Scrap the batch file as you said,
A (2) Create a link to TB! on my Quick Launch toolbar with included the
A /nologo parameter,
A (3) Configure the hotkey to point to that
Hi Hans!
In message mid:341419875.20021026213051;rosenbrand.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 2:30:51 PM, you wrote:
HR Ok, it took me some time to figure out how to set folder permissions
HR in XPhome (no security tab when I right-click a folder, so I had to
HR boot in safe mode to make the
Hi ~John!
In message mid:1357221464.20021023101158;semo.net
on Wednesday, October 23, 2002, 12:11:58 PM, you wrote:
j I bet when I stapled the telephone wire to the house one of
j the staples cut too deep... I can hear on my phone when my
j computer is dialing up.
Yes, that will happen if the
Hi Barry2!
In message mid:9167294797.20021024020938;freeuk.com
on Wednesday, October 23, 2002, 8:09:38 PM, you wrote:
JS Start/Run/type command/Click OK
B Works in Win98 too !! So the old DOS backbone is still lurking in
B WinXP :-)
Actually, more like a forebone in the NT-based systems. In
Hi Anne!
In message mid:2180494747.20021025021700;gmx.co.uk
on Thursday, October 24, 2002, 8:17:00 PM, you wrote:
SM The original Win95 will install on 4M; I used to do a lot of that
SM right after Win95 came out.
A But would it run The Bat! ? ;-)
The important question is, if you turn it on
Hi Paul!
In message mid:57123078093.20021026223044;pcartwright.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:30:44 PM, you wrote:
j I bet when I stapled the telephone wire to the house one of
j the staples cut too deep... I can hear on my phone when my
j computer is dialing up.
SM Yes, that will
Hi Leif!
In message mid:15368980218.20021026192356;pcwize.com
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 8:23:56 PM, you wrote:
LG Please try to avoid changing the subject of a thread to something
Perhaps you should clarify that he should create a brand new message
instead of replying to another message.
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270255.TAA14570;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 9:55:54 PM, you wrote:
SU I have received 18 files within the last 48 hours that are infected
SU with the I-Worm/klez.k virus. No damage has been done, but it is a real
SU nuisance. I downloaded the bat
Hi Randal!
In message mid:200210270321.UAA18081;scn.org
on Saturday, October 26, 2002, 10:21:46 PM, you wrote:
I want to block the following IP address
66-214-156-51.riv-eres.charterpipeline.net instead of merely the
domaing name.
Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download.
Hi Marck and others!
In message mid:488327688.20021025102258;silverstones.com
on Friday, October 25, 2002, 4:22:58 AM, you wrote:
MDP I haven't said this myself yet, but Allie has said it - I won't be
MDP participating in a message board. Every time I have been forced to
MDP use one, I have
Hi Anne!
In message mid:25310639730.20021023035302;gmx.co.uk
on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 9:53:02 PM, you wrote:
A We have a 486 box downstairs that runs Win95 on just 8Mb of RAM and it
A works fine.
The original Win95 will install on 4M; I used to do a lot of that
right after Win95 came
Hi Angel!
In message mid:182217506908.20021022083121;email.com
on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 10:31:21 AM, you wrote:
A I really wish there were some other way to 'learn' about new modules being
A put out, other than 'trial and error'. LOL
I really wish they'd send my registration key.
Hi Marck!
In message mid:11068352045.20021020095421;silverstones.com
on Sunday, October 20, 2002, 3:54:21 AM, you wrote:
MDP Here's an interesting point: Auto format (toggle it on/off with
MDP Ctrl-Shift-F) will retain certain extra spacing within paragraphs
MDP .. like punctuation spacing.
Hi Marck!
In message mid:4368798597.20021020100148;silverstones.com
on Sunday, October 20, 2002, 4:01:48 AM, you wrote:
MDP Dispatch is the correct spelling of the word. Despatch is not a
MDP real word and is a typo on your dispatch forms :-). For some
MDP reason the word despatch
Hi Nick!
In message mid:20021018120126.4F21.ANDRIASH;shaw.ca
on Friday, October 18, 2002, 2:07:25 PM, you wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-054.asp
NA Thanks Marcus... I have read the article, but I still remain skeptical.
NA Why? Because if that were true, the
Hi Carren!
In message mid:71738660.20021019151858;myrealbox.com
on Friday, October 18, 2002, 9:18:58 PM, you wrote:
CS Sometimes I really think that we expect *way* too much here of TB!
CS beginners! Even though your explanation above is correct and clearly
CS set out, I think that for a total
Hi Leif!
In message mid:3172553015.20021018202348;pcwize.com
on Friday, October 18, 2002, 9:23:48 PM, you wrote:
LG Concerning your templates, if you place the %CURSOR macro *below* the
LG %QUOTES macro, you'll never have to worry about top posting again.
Yeah, well, then there's the
Hi Leif!
In message mid:4176216546.20021018212451;pcwize.com
on Friday, October 18, 2002, 10:24:51 PM, you wrote:
SP This is the preferred method and the *only* one that is acceptable
SP on this list. Here you respond to the original message case by
LG *only*??? Preferred yes, only, no. Like
Hi Thomas!
In message mid:2022423926.20021020004212;gmx.net
on Saturday, October 19, 2002, 12:42:12 PM, you wrote:
Is there an option anywhere in TB! to set the Mail Despatcher to
function globally, for all accounts? I mean, rather than multiple
Despatcher windows popping up when checking
Hi Wayne!
In message mid:165386606694.20021019051640;kc99.com
on Saturday, October 19, 2002, 7:16:40 AM, you wrote:
WB I tried Pegasus too Mary but when I discovered that each message was a
WB file on my computer, I knew I would have problems. I now have over
WB 32,000 messages which is a
Hi Marck!
In message mid:17124818306.20021019214849;silverstones.com
on Saturday, October 19, 2002, 3:48:49 PM, you wrote:
MDP That's because you have to look it up with the correct spelling (as
MDP it appears in the menu) ;-).
It also helps to use Message instead of Mail. :)
--
--Scott.
Hi Steven!
In message mid:003a01c27637$b0a0eb10$1758728d;arnold
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 6:48:23 PM, you wrote:
SMS Could someone please assist me with unsubscribing from this list? I've
SMS emailed what I thought was the unsubscribe address, but the mail came
SMS back. Any help
Hi Laura!
In message mid:10331470372.20021017160415;wildpetals.com
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 6:04:15 PM, you wrote:
A is there a way to tell if norton antivirus detected a virus in
A a message and filter it to some other folder based on the
A attachment name containing norton
Hi!
In message mid:138252794109.20021017200212;local.nu
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:02:12 PM, you wrote:
SM Due to a bug in filtering mime headers (apparently can't do it), this
SM apparently cannot be done in a direct manner. The best that I could do
SM is this, which seems to catch
Hi Chris!
In message mid:1417360232.20021017182805;Surfcity.net
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:28:05 PM, you wrote:
CW Maybe it's just the Eicar file or am I being kind?
The EICAR file should always be caught, otherwise the purpose of it is
defeated.
--
--Scott.
mailto:Wizard;local.nu
Hi mm!
In message mid:3645170605.20021017225407;sprintmail.com
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 9:54:07 PM, you wrote:
MM I have discovered in the middle of all my confusion that I have two
MM .exe files in The Bat! directory:
MMthe_bat.exe 2,43K 7/24/2002 and thebat.exe 4,580K
Hello mm,
Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:11:46 PM, you wrote:
SM I have this:
SM 07/09/2002 05:53 pm 4,689,408 thebat.exe
mM I'm running version 1.61 personal. My 7.09.02 file is also 17.53 but
mM the size is different. 4,580 KB
Right-click and select Properties; it should show
Hi Richard!
In message mid:3017709404.20021018043545;cix.co.uk
on Thursday, October 17, 2002, 10:35:45 PM, you wrote:
RW Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar
RW extension?
http://www.rarlab.com/
--
--Scott.
mailto:Wizard;local.nu
Using The Bat! 1.61 under
Hi Roelof!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 4:06:19 AM, you wrote:
SM Is there an easy way to get the archives off of the old server
SM without wading through hundreds of web pages? Maybe if someone has
SM them in a message base, they could
Hi John!
In message 000301c27583$740a68c0$819629d8@pavilion">mid:000301c27583$740a68c0$819629d8@pavilion
on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 9:18:11 PM, you wrote:
jM Could someone please unsubscribe me from the list.
If you still have TheBat! installed, click on Specials | Mailing List
|
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 5:23:26 AM, you wrote:
RW Yes but it *still* doesn't help my jump from one message, past all the
RW messages that have been posted in the meantime, to the original
RW message that it was replied to.
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 12:18:07 PM, you wrote:
RW On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 07:54:41[GMT -0500](which was 13:54 where I
RW live) you wrote:
RW Yes but it *still* doesn't help my jump from one message, past all the
RW
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 10:35:41 PM, you wrote:
RW [PGP]
RW Sender
RW yes
Don't you mean subject, not sender?
--
--Scott.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon
Hi Thomas!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, 12:07:21 AM, you wrote:
TF Now *that* is neat! :-))) I didn't even know about it...
Did you do that on purpose? :)
Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 4:43:14 PM, 3w wrote:
3w And I've also seen threads
Hi Marck!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 8:23:26 PM, you wrote:
MDP @15-Oct-2002, 19:51 -0500 (01:51 UK time) Scott McNay [SM] in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP I was under the impression that mos
Hi, Miguel!
Monday, October 14, 2002, 6:54:19 AM, you wrote:
I think he is talking about the 75 in the highlighted folder...
MAU Of course, that's what I mean.
I saw a similar problem with 1.61 when I was messing with filters.
Every once in a while, I would have a folder that I had
Hi, Leif!
Monday, October 14, 2002, 12:50:30 PM, you wrote:
SM What's wrong with doing it the way you do it now, mark, copy,
SM paste it to the filter list. I mean, how often do you change your
LG In the context of grabbing a filter someone posts, I *totally* agree.
LG In the context of
Hi, Leif!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 11:35:32 AM, you wrote:
awc when TB receives it, it would automatically cause the new filter
awc be loaded to the receiving machine.
LG Don't know about that part. I'd hate to get an e-mail from a spammer
LG that modifies my filters to allow his SPAM to get
Hi, alists!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:37:33 PM, you wrote:
awc as new junk mail comes in i'm always adding filters
Every day?
Mostly I add whitelist filters maybe one a week, and even then, with
the $KNOWN$ filter, that catches most of everything already. Most of
my new filters
Hi, Allie!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 1:49:27 PM, you wrote:
ACM I'd be happy with the current method if I could select and copy more
ACM than a single filter at a time. Currently, I have to copy and paste
Oh, I'm not arguaing about that. I'm surprised that that ability wasn't added
long ago.
Hi, alists!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 2:12:25 PM, you wrote:
awc i don't know what a whitelist filter is.. but i do try to purge
awc off my system as much of the porn as possible.. and all those
awc nigerian mails, animal stuff, geez, it's amazing. i don't even
awc want it in my junk
Hi, Laura!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 3:09:28 PM, you wrote:
DC I created a separate address book, called killfile, and discard all mail
DC from anyone that is KNOWN in that address book.
awc what i've found is that the messages are from tons of different
awc sources.. often the same message..
Hi, Laura!
Sunday, October 13, 2002, 3:36:28 PM, you wrote:
awc I get 150 or so per day that are junk! often more...
Well, I'm not up to that point. Yet. :)
--
--Scott.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 on an AMD Athlon XP 1900 (1.6G
real,
Hi, jwayne!
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 7:25:04 PM, you wrote:
j TB 1.61.
j Not infrequently, I get an error message when starting TB.
j 1) Privileged Instruction
j or
j 2) Access violation at address (various) in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address
(various)
What version of
Hi, Richard!
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 1:28:02 AM, you wrote:
RW Hello Thomas,
RW Ah, all my questions being gradually answered apart from why messages
RW originally went to the inbox without a CC and now don't but I will
RW amend my rules so that outgoing messages go straight to the
Hi, Gerard!
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 6:08:22 PM, you wrote:
DGRS Mark as how? With the This message has been certified virus free by
DGRS blah, blah, blah etc.? One the freeware AVG does not do this as only
DGRS Why would you want that garbage at the end of incoming or outgoing
DGRS mail
Hi, Richard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:12:30 AM, you wrote:
RW It's not that I'm having trouble with it because I don't think, in my
RW situation, I shall ever need such complicated rules. I just wish that
RW the more simple rules could be explained to remove any un clearness or
RW
Hi, Gerard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:48:20 AM, you wrote:
G I have had this happen. I sent and email and it was moved to the inbox
G but never was sent. I know this because I use a SMTP server and it just
G didn't get there.
G I found that if I removed about 2 lines from the bottom the mail
Hi Scott, do I know you??
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 7:42:37 AM, you wrote:
SM Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and
SM TB! didn't fix it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might
SM have had that result with certain anti-spam servers.
I tried a test
Hi, Richard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 4:54:08 PM, you wrote:
MW The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder.
RW That doesn't mean they reach their destination though. I've had 3
RW messages in the last 24 hours that have just disappeared even though
RW they are shown as sent in
Hi, Thomas!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 11:40:50 PM, you wrote:
TF The reason is that I am on dial-up, and my connection breaks
TF automtically after 20 minutes.
TF PABX). Since they have only 24 lines for 80 or so appartments, the
TF time for each call is limited to 20 minutes, the PABX will
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 1:47:48 AM, you wrote:
SM Option only seems to be there if you have messages sorted by thread.
PP Which shouldn't matter, as the OP asks: ... mark an individual thread
PP as read? which implies a
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 4:28:20 AM, you wrote:
PP Have a look at the source (F9) next time. I guess you'll see the
PP correct message text, albeit there might be some very strange characters
PP around.
On this subject, I've
Hi Thomas!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:06:19 AM, you wrote:
T They use bandwidth in emailing themselves,
TF If that were all they do, I'd uninstall my anti-virus programm right
TF away. I guess the (at least) weekly updates cost me more
PROTECTED]*)
Actions: faoRegExp
EndFilter
BeginFilter
Target: \\local.nu\Inbox\Reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MainSet: 40^(Reply-to: .*[EMAIL PROTECTED])
EndFilter
Any ideas? Here are the relevant parts of the headers of the messages
that keep looping:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Scott McNay
Hi Thomas!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:07:51 AM, you wrote:
TF On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:37:30 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:37 +0700 GMT),
TF Scott McNay wrote:
TF If that were all they do, I'd uninstall my anti-virus programm
TF right a
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 9:23:14 AM, you wrote:
PP Now tell me the difficulties when having in mind there are four
PP possibilities to visualize threads in TB! with 'select thread' ... And
PP see why it's safer the option ain't
Hi Thomas!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:51:08 AM, you wrote:
TF On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:19:57 -0500 GMT (07/10/02, 19:19 +0700 GMT),
TF Scott McNay wrote:
SM On this subject, I've seen an occasional corrupted email that
SM shows
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:52:11 PM, you wrote:
RW I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign
RW of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it
RW with another programme
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:04:09 PM, you wrote:
RW On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live)
RW you wrote:
RW OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I
RW was just
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sunday, October 6, 2002, 11:54:07 PM, you wrote:
CS Is there any way to mark an individual thread as read? I can see that
CS you can right click and mark an individual message as read
PM In the same menu: Thread -- Mark as read
Hi Doug!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sunday, October 6, 2002, 4:02:30 AM, you wrote:
DW Hi,
DW Thanks to people here I've made a great deal of progress. I do have
DW one that's stumped me.
DW In 'view headers' mode, the subject is:
DW Subject:
Hi ~John!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, October 5, 2002, 1:30:37 PM, you wrote:
jI need to know how to create a filter, or something that will show
jall e-mails that I have Replied to with a line going through it.
jOr in other words have the
Hi Chris!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, October 5, 2002, 1:47:23 PM, you wrote:
CW Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear in my
CW inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
Yes, press F9 to check the header to see.
Hi Tim!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, October 5, 2002, 5:51:11 PM, you wrote:
T After recently cleaning out all the viruses from my mother's computer,
T I've decided it's time she changed from Outlook Express to TB!
T I've set up her account in TB!, and set
Hi Doug!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, October 4, 2002, 3:59:38 PM, you wrote:
DW AltSet:7: 50Pen...
Another reason to edit, which is just as important, is that many spam
filters check for such words (sound familiar?) and filter out such
messages. Thus, a
Hi Jan!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, October 4, 2002, 4:18:44 PM, you wrote:
DW I want to set up a filter to trap
DW anything with [] anywhere in the subject
DW line, either on its own or preceded or
DW followed by any characters. I have
DW looked, obviously
Hi Doug!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 3, 2002, 2:12:38 AM, you wrote:
DW I like autocompleted subject lines. I belong to a list to which I send recipes
with a common beginning to the subject line. This gives me less to change.
You mean like this?
Hi Elaine!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 3, 2002, 3:28:04 PM, you wrote:
E Was that a private (copyrighted?) email shared publicly?
E Americans are a bore (boor?) about this I realize. Therefore, I
E lurk more than post. I am afraid of toes (eggs?)
Hi Thomas!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 1:49:26 AM, you wrote:
TF On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:12:24 -0500 GMT (01/10/02, 09:12 +0700 GMT),
TF Scott McNay wrote:
TF On what kind of system would that cuase a lockup? Are we talking
Hi Joseph!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 8:08:30 AM, you wrote:
SM A target folder is ok, since I sooner or later move my sent mail
SM to the inbox anyway, to be automatically sorted by the same
SM filters that handle incoming email
JN
Hi Ricardo!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 2:21:48 PM, you wrote:
RMR how about an 'Outgoing Filter' ?
RMR It would white-list everyone you send a message to, and not exactly
RMR everyone you reply to, but I guess it's close enough for most
Hi Lars!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 2:36:04 PM, you wrote:
LG Although I'd guess from the original message that collecting the
LG addresses from every person you write a message to would be just fine.
Right; I don't see much point in
Hi Geoff!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 4:46:28 PM, you wrote:
GB Hi, I'm trying to import my mailboxes from Netscape 6, and the import
GB wizard is failing spectacularly. (i.e. it's not doing *anything*).
GB Could someone perhaps give me a
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 4:56:57 PM, you wrote:
JA Highlight from where it says BeginFilter to EndFilter (inclusive),
JA copy (CTRL C), then go to your filters dialog box, and press CTRL V.
PK
Hi Ricardo!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 7:33:58 PM, you wrote:
A Or a simple way to tell a firewall what to do?
RMR every firewall has it's own command. ¿ Wich firewall are you using ?
Some firewalls are actually local networks; the
Hi Ricardo!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 9:01:07 PM, you wrote:
RMR every firewall has it's own command. ¿ Wich firewall are you using ?
SM it could be outside his ability to do anything about.
RMR that's why I think he should just
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
