Hello MAU,
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
M> Sorry for my late reply, I was away all week and can't use my phone to
M> send to the list.
>> I owe you an apology Miguel.
M> Heck no! You owe me a beer ;-)
I would be delighted to provide a beer or two, or seven, should we
Hello Jack,
Sorry for my late reply, I was away all week and can't use my phone to
send to the list.
> I owe you an apology Miguel.
Heck no! You owe me a beer ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! Version 9.5.1 (64-bit)
Hello MAU,
On Monday, April 18, 2022 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
>> I need to trap a bunch of ever changing merchandise and/or
>> political ads. Each one is different.
M> Even if it is an ever changing list of ads (senders), I still think the
M> AB Groups is a much easier and cleaner
Hello MAU,
On Monday, April 18, 2022 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
>> Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far
>> the
>> only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender.
>> Needless to
>> say, this leads to a very large filter.
M> Do you
Hello Jack,
> I need to trap a bunch of ever changing merchandise and/or
> political ads. Each one is different.
Even if it is an ever changing list of ads (senders), I still think the
AB Groups is a much easier and cleaner way than the endless ORs or
BLOCKS that you were trying. If
Hello MAU,
On Monday, April 18, 2022 you wrote:
M> Hello Jack,
>> Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far
>> the
>> only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender.
>> Needless to
>> say, this leads to a very large filter.
M> Do you
Hello Jack,
> Once again I am in need of a way to filter (trap) multiple senders. So far the
> only thing that has worked is OR>SENDER>CONTAINS>text for each sender.
> Needless to
> say, this leads to a very large filter.
Do you have all the senders in your Address Book? If yes, I would
create
Hello Ian,
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 you wrote:
IAW> G'day Jack,
>> Anyone have any idea why the filter caught 39 of them and not any of the
>> others?
IAW> I have a similar situation where I use the following common filter for
incoming messages.
IAW> The "members" of the group are set
Hello Stuart,
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 you wrote:
SC> Hello Jack,
SC> A reminder of what Jack S. LaRosa typed on:
SC> July 21, 2021 at 12:46:20 GMT -0500
JSL>> It seems so simple and as I mentioned, a "re-filter" action on the source
folder
JSL>> did
Hello Jack,
A reminder of what Jack S. LaRosa typed on:
July 21, 2021 at 12:46:20 GMT -0500
JSL> It seems so simple and as I mentioned, a "re-filter" action on the source
folder
JSL> did find 39 of the emails contained in the block of addresses. But only on
the
JSL&
nk you Miguel. I'm going to try your suggestion.
However, if this .png makes it through (it's only 4KB), it'll show how the
filter is built. Notice the up/down arrows to the right of the box displaying
"email address 5". clicking those arrows will move you up or down through all
the 127 *actua
Hello Jack,
> I have a folder which contains multiple unique emails from a particular group
> of
> people. They were originally moved there manually. I wanted to create a filter
> for the source folder to look for the characters in their email addresses
> which
> appear before the @ sign, then
Hello Stefan Tanurkov via TBUDL,
Thank you. I used The Bat for MANY years several years ago. I moved to a MAC so
I couldn't use it, but I have moved back to Windows so I'm back. I am
embarrassed to say, I forgot about the folders tab in the filter manager .. so
thanks for the push in the right
Hello Jody,
Wednesday, December 2, 2020, 4:23:43 AM, you wrote:
> Is there a way to set ANY message, that is in a specific folder, as read.
Presumably, you are talking about IMAP folders in your scenario, then the
answer is yes - you can do it with incoming filters assigned to specific
Hi
On Monday 1 December 2014 at 4:27:44 PM, in
mid:1029546671.20141201112...@denstarfarm.us, RD wrote:
TB! version 6.7.2 and windows 6/1/7601
Hello TBUDL: I have a new Virtual Folder which collects
notifications of new versions of Apps from various
lists to which I belong.
Some
Sunday, July 6, 2014, 3:03:17 AM, you wrote:
I don't understand why RITlabs don't make all filters into Common
Filters, with the per-account filters views just showing the
Common Filters currently ticked for that account.
Perhaps they will in one of the next versions of The Bat.
I've
Hi
On Thursday 3 July 2014 at 12:53:11 PM, in
mid:1376411768.20140703135...@ags.lu, Adrian Godfrey wrote:
Is there a way to copy and paste ALL filters (or at
least more than one at a time) associated with a
specific email address to common filtera?
As far as I know there is no way
Hallo Greg,
Op woensdag 28 december 2011, 1:37:13, schreef Greg Strong:
I have a filter not working when using Folder Re-filter . See
below in quote box.
I altered the target folder and for me the filter functioned properly.
Though at first it didn't because the test message was intercepted
Good afternoon Roger,
It was foretold that
on 26/05/2011 @ 07:19:43 GMT+0200 (which was 02:19:43 where I live)
Roger Phillips would write:
snipped a bit
Try 'Recipient match @forumname'
Tnx roger and agent.
--
Best regards,
Luc
Pgp key:
Good afternoon Roger,
It was foretold that
on 26/05/2011 @ 07:19:43 GMT+0200 (which was 02:19:43 where I live)
Roger Phillips would write:
snipped a bit
Try 'Recipient match @forumname'
No luck. Testing the filter gives me the message that it has been
moved but the message didn't actually
Good afternoon list,
Well it seems TB! was in a lazy mood ... after a few minutes the
filter kicked in and fo the time being all is well :-)
--
Best regards,
Luc
Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.2.6 with
Windows XP (build 2600), version
5.1 Service Pack 3 and
using
Hi Luc and others -
i receive mail notifications from a forum but unfortunately it's in
the format membername@forumname.
I just can't seem to recall how to filter just on the @forumname
part.
Any pointers?
I use Header Contains thebat.dutaint.com to filter (and move to a folder) all
Hello Luc,
Thursday, May 26, 2011, 6:49:40 AM, among other things, you wrote:
L i receive mail notifications from a forum but unfortunately it's in
L the format membername@forumname.
L I just can't seem to recall how to filter just on the @forumname
L part.
L Any pointers?
Try 'Recipient
Hi
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 at 6:33:22 AM, in
mid:795040109.20090929073...@dbnmail.co.za, Roger Phillips wrote:
Hello MFPA,
Monday, September 28, 2009, 7:24:04 PM, among other
things, you wrote:
M I am going mad :( -
Have you put the test filter at the head of the filter queue?
Guten Tag Tom,
am Sonntag, 27. September 2009 um 23:51 schrieben Sie:
I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now
if sender contains nam...@gmail.com
move to folder XZY
I am testing this on one highlighted message via refilter selected
folder with the relevant boxes
Dear Tom,
@28-Sep-2009, 07:51 +1000 (27-Sep 22:51 here) Tom [T] in
mid:1324329289.20090928075...@sunnysydney.com said to Roger:
... snip
T I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now
T if sender contains nam...@gmail.com
T move to folder XZY
T I am testing this on one
Hi
On Sunday 27 September 2009 at 10:51:25 PM, in
mid:1324329289.20090928075...@sunnysydney.com, Tom wrote:
I am going mad :( -
It gets like that sometimes.
I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing -
it's now if sender contains nam...@gmail.com move to
folder XZY
Have you
Hello MFPA,
Monday, September 28, 2009, 7:24:04 PM, among other things, you wrote:
M I am going mad :( -
Have you put the test filter at the head of the filter queue? That is
always the best place for testing as it eliminates the possibility of
interference by other filters as
Hello Tom,
Saturday, September 26, 2009, 2:13:10 PM, among other things, you wrote:
T Still no luck, tried to change it to
T header field to or cc or bcc and sender contains ... but still
T some messages won't budge.
It looks as though something has perhaps become corrupted. Why not try
Hi
On Friday 25 September 2009 at 4:55:53 PM, in
mid:632520461.20090925175...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Guten Tag MFPA,
am Freitag, 25. September 2009 um 16:41 schrieben Sie:
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Current
Guten Tag MFPA,
am Sonntag, 27. September 2009 um 12:52 schrieben Sie:
I *am* using The Bat! v4.0.38
That is what i have been wondering about, TNX.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
The Bat! 4.2.10.12 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.5 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2
Sunday, September 27, 2009, 4:49:19 PM, you wrote:
It looks as though something has perhaps become corrupted. Why not try
writing a completely new filter from scratch?
I am going mad :( -
I tried to simplify the filter purely for testing - it's now
if sender contains nam...@gmail.com
Saturday, September 26, 2009, 12:41:17 AM, you wrote:
Hi
On Friday 25 September 2009 at 12:21:00 AM, in
mid:415057556.20090924182...@fastmail.fm, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM,
you wrote:
T I have however tried some radical changes and even
T
Hi
On Friday 25 September 2009 at 12:21:00 AM, in
mid:415057556.20090924182...@fastmail.fm, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Hello Tom, Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM,
you wrote:
T I have however tried some radical changes and even
T for these some messages do not move:
T if header contains
Guten Tag MFPA,
am Freitag, 25. September 2009 um 16:41 schrieben Sie:
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Current version is 4.2.10.0
Error or Truth?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
The Bat!
Guten Tag Tom,
am Donnerstag, 24. September 2009 um 04:38 schrieben Sie:
I cannot figure out how
to set the rule so that it works even if the email was sent to y, z,
a, b and c.
If you do not see the Filter Condition in the To: or Cc: Field, you
have to parse the Headers.
But simply
Hi
On Thursday 24 September 2009 at 3:38:09 AM, in
mid:415846758.20090924123...@sunnysydney.com, Tom wrote:
I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special
account if sender contains xx and recipient contains y.
This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot
figure out how to
Hiya
T I set up a filter to move incoming emails to a special account if
T sender contains xx and recipient contains y.
T This works well if the recipient is only y. I cannot figure out how
T to set the rule so that it works even if the
T email was sent to y, z,
T a, b and c.
Assuming I have I
Thursday, September 24, 2009, 11:41:38 PM, you wrote:
A few thoughts:-
Is y an email address or a name? If a name, is it stated slightly
differently in the email sent to y, z, a, b and c that does not end up
in the folder you want?
Assuming y is your address, are any of z, a, b or c
Hello Tom,
Thursday, September 24, 2009, 5:06:04 PM, you wrote:
T I have however tried some radical changes and even for these some
T messages do not move:
T if header contains j@company.com
T and sender match sharyn...@isp.com
T move to folder ABC
You may not want to use Match as I think
that it works even if the email was sent to y, z,
T a, b and c.
Such a filter works OK here!
I found an old message which had multiple addressees in the 'To' field and
copied it to my 'Inbox'. I then set up a filter as you described and used
the re-filter command, and the message was moved
[Reply to: »Luc« · 2009-03-19 · 00:33 h (CET)]
Moin, Luc!
Okay, I use that one, too. :-)
Try: Options… = Filtering = White list of email addresses
Maybe the White list of email addresses will not work because the
sender's address in the mailing list is *not* t...@yahoogroups.com,
but his own
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2009-03-19 · 10:55 h (CET)]
Options… = Filtering = White rules
Just import there the attached rule. – I hope that helps. :-)
Sh**! Forgot, that attachments are forbidden. So download the file
here: http://www.ahrendt.net/share/TBOT_WhiteRule.zip
Cheers!
VA
- --
Good afternoon Volker,
It was foretold that on 19/03/2009 @ 10:55:07 GMT+0100 (which was
06:55:07 where I live) Volker Ahrendt would write:
snipped a bit
Maybe the White list of email addresses will not work because the
sender's address in the mailing list is *not* t...@yahoogroups.com,
[Reply to: »Luc« · 2009-03-18 · 22:01 h (CET)]
Moin, Luc!
I'm using the following filter to filter messages from tbot list.
But they all get marked as junk. Is there something wrong with my
filter?
You should whitelist the TBOT Mailing List in your Anti Junk Plug-in,
because the plug-in
Good evening Volker,
It was foretold that on 18/03/2009 @ 22:26:18 GMT+0100 (which was
18:26:18 where I live) Volker Ahrendt would write:
You should whitelist the TBOT Mailing List in your Anti Junk Plug-in,
because the plug-in filters incoming messages *before* incoming mail
filters are
[Reply to: »Luc« · 2009-03-18 · 23:18 h (CET)]
Moin, Luc!
You should whitelist the TBOT Mailing List in your Anti Junk
Plug-in, because the plug-in filters incoming messages *before*
incoming mail filters are triggered.
Ah, haven't thought of that ... gonna give it a try :-)
Which Anti
Good evening Volker,
It was foretold that on 18/03/2009 @ 23:30:05 GMT+0100 (which was
19:30:05 where I live) Volker Ahrendt would write:
Okay, I use that one, too. :-)
Try: Options… = Filtering = White list of email addresses
Done ... sending test message as we speak :-)
--
Best
Good evening Volker,
It was foretold that on 18/03/2009 @ 23:30:05 GMT+0100 (which was
19:30:05 where I live) Volker Ahrendt would write:
snipped a bit
Okay, I use that one, too. :-)
Btw, how did you know that the plug-in filters incoming messages *before*
incoming mail
filters are
Hello Tom,
All filters are set to continue processing with other filters.
snipped
So if filter rule 3 is met, the journey ends in folder Bounce but
otherwise rule 4 should apply.
You should then set filter 3 to NOT continue processing with other
filters
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hallo Eddie,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:56:18 +0100GMT (14-12-2008, 15:56 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
EC Could you please look at this filter?
I'd like to do that, but the best way to check a filter is by pasting
it into your own sorting office and you're making that kind of
difficult
Dear Roelof,
-- Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2008, 15:39:59:
EC Could you please look at this filter?
I'd like to do that, but the best way to check a filter is by
pasting it into your own sorting office and you're making that kind
of difficult by placing silly characters like '| in front of
Hallo Eddie,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:13:10 +0100GMT (14-12-2008, 18:13 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
EC No, it's before the TBUDL
Well, that's your first mistake, make it a subfilter of the tbudl
filter that makes it easier to filter, because only need the subject.
EC BTW - the filter is a
Dear Roelof,
-- Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2008, 17:40:02:
EC No, it's before the TBUDL
Well, that's your first mistake, make it a subfilter of the tbudl
filter that makes it easier to filter, because only need the
subject.
How to create a subfilter? You mean by that a filter by itself below
Hallo Eddie,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:52:29 +0100GMT (14-12-2008, 18:52 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
EC How to create a subfilter? You mean by that a filter by itself below
EC TBUDL?
Select the tbudl filter in the sorting office and select in the menu:
File - New subfilter
--
Groetjes,
Dear Roelof,
-- Sonntag, 14. Dezember 2008, 17:56:23:
EC How to create a subfilter? You mean by that a filter by itself
EC below TBUDL?
Select the tbudl filter in the sorting office and select in the
menu: File - New subfilter
Thanks now it works. My mistake was that when re-filtering I
Hallo Eddie,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:09:41 +0100GMT (14-12-2008, 19:09 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
EC BTW - may i guide your attention to my posting from early this day?
EC Many thanks! 766128752.20081214101...@gmail.com
You can try, but next time mention it as
Dear tracer,
-- Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, 00:02:52:
Thanks now it works. My mistake was that when re-filtering I the
two boxes 'read messages' and 'replied messages' under rules had a
mark. I was assuming that I don't need to mark 'incoming mail'.
If as I am assuming you are filtering
Dear Roelof,
-- Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, 00:38:48:
EC BTW - may i guide your attention to my posting from early this
EC day? Many thanks! 766128752.20081214101...@gmail.com
You can try, but next time mention it as
mid:766128752.20081214101...@gmail.com
otherwise TB thinks it's an
Hello Gunivortus,
Saturday, April 26, 2008, 12:50:12 PM, you wrote:
Often there's an unknowm name added, like:
- From: hewett kalappa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- From: brand hugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- From: Amazing Watches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 'recieved from' paths are of course wrong.
Hello REZK945,
I want to create a filter rule which does the following:
Every not-gpg-signed email will get an automatic generated answer.
I'm not familiar with gpg or pgp, etc., but I assume there must be
something unique to those messages. An specific header field, or textt
within the
Tuesday, January 22, 2008, 12:03:30 PM, you wrote:
T Anyway, I will try to inactivate the filter and see what happens
T first.
Don't inactivate any filter. Just take that frigging tickmark off the
Continue option in the first filter, that's all.
Thomas,
thanks again for your patience.
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:50 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 19:02 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T thanks again for your patience.
T Everything is working fine now.
You are most welcome. Thanks for your feedback.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Was ist ein Optimist ? - Jemand der das eine Fernsehprogramm
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter:
Is this also in Account A? Since the first filter is set
Hi
On Monday 21 January 2008 at 5:09:16 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher W. wrote:
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and do a
columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
MFPA @ 2008-1-21 9:39:23 AM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you copy it into a new message, then you can hold down ALT and
do a columnar selection.
Wow that's cool! Is it a TB! feature or a general wp feature?
It seems to be a feature of more powerful text editors, like MicroEd
and my
Monday, January 21, 2008, 11:08:29 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:09:12 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 11:09 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T here we go again:
T 1. Filter:
This is in Account A. It moves the messages to the bounce folder in
Account B. You say it works.
T 2. Filter:
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:16:29 +1100 GMT (22/01/2008, 04:16 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T Thomas, thanks for your assistance. You are right with respect to the
T accounts but that does not fully solve the issue.
OK. Good that we are clear which filter is in which account.
T I understand
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:38:17 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 14:38 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T What exactly do you want me to post? I thought I had provided the
T details of the filter already?
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:47:17 PM, you wrote:
To post the filter, you right-click on it and choose copy. Then you
paste it into your message. I am posting my TBUDL filter here for
demonstration:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
thanks - I am sure you are right - here
Hi
On Sunday 20 January 2008 at 8:47:17 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
No matter where you go, there
Hello MFPA,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:06:51 + GMT (21/01/2008, 04:06 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Yes, but my guess is that you overlooked something.
M Like maybe a tick in continue processing with other filters?
We will see this when we import the filters.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
BALDERDASH:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:39:16 +1100 GMT (21/01/2008, 03:39 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is on the account that actually carries the incoming
T message:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have
Monday, January 21, 2008, 12:56:57 PM, you wrote:
TB! Message Filter
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way you
posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy from
there into
Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take all these quote marks out manually, and then copy
from there into the
Hello Tom,
A reminder of what Tom typed on:
Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 10:41:08 GMT +1100
T Is there a better criteria I should look for in the header for my
T filter or another reason why my setup is failing. I just would like
T all incoming mails in Account B with the bounces separated
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new filter ahead of this for the bounces:
T if Text
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 1:43:54 PM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:41:08 +1100 GMT (20/01/2008, 06:41 +0700 GMT),
Tom wrote:
T This filter is set up as: if recipient contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] move to
T the folder \Account B\Customer in.
T This works fine.
T I put up a new
Hello Secret,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:37:32 +1100 GMT (11/12/2007, 19:37 +0700 GMT),
Secret Squirrel wrote:
SS I have a filter that moves emails from a certain email address to
SS a folder. How do I add an exception to it? Specifically,
SS I want the rule to only move the emails from the inbox to
Hello Secret,
A reminder of what Secret Squirrel typed on:
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 23:37:32 GMT +1100
SS I have a filter that moves emails from a certain email address to a
SS folder. How do I add an exception to it? Specifically, I want the rule
SS to only move the emails from the
Hello Thomas,
Not sure I understand what you mean... To clarify, when I run
re-filter manually for my inbox TB appears to have captured the last
counts from the previous manual re-filter, so right now it's showing 6
messages in my inbox as being processed and 1 filtered. Instead of
clearing
Hello TBUDL,
Whenever I re-filter my inbox, even if there are no messages to filter
TB reports that two messages have been filtered every single
time. Does anyone have a solution to this?
--
Best regards,
Tim
The Bat! v3.99.29
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Tim,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:06:45 -0700 GMT (17/11/2007, 02:06 +0700 GMT),
Tim Hamm wrote:
TH Whenever I re-filter my inbox, even if there are no messages to filter
TH TB reports that two messages have been filtered every single
TH time. Does anyone have a solution to this?
You
Hello Neal,
Thursday, October 11, 2007, 8:23:51 PM, among other things, you wrote:
NL I've been trying to figure out how to get a signal string text file to
NL work in v3.x filter. I want to kill messages on the server and have an
NL external word list. Do I put a macro in filter condition or
Hi Roger,
Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 12:17:12 AM, you wrote:
NL I've been trying to figure out how to get a signal string text file to
NL work in v3.x filter. I want to kill messages on the server and have an
NL external word list. Do I put a macro in filter condition or what?
If you go
Roger,
NL No problem - I'm there - but the filter does not seem to pick up the
NL file.
That is what I meant about often being not functional. It seems things
have not changed.
I looked to see it there was a bug report on it, but I guess not.
Maybe I'll make one.
NL My spam is so out
Hallo John,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 15:12:40 +1000GMT (5-9-2007, 7:12 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JP Any easy way to move (or copy) a whole bunch of filters from one
JP account to another, or to make existing filters common filters?
The filters are stored in the account.srb file (account.erb
Roelof,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, at 12:41:09 [GMT +0200] (20:41:09 05/09/2007
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
I don't use common filters myself, two of my three accounts are merely
for some testing, so I don't need any filtering there.
snip, etc.
Thanks for the help.
--
Regards,
John
Hello Roland,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:01:32 +0200GMT Roland Burger wrote:
RB is it possible to set a filter for an account so that only
RB special addresses will be accepted?
Create an address book for the acceptable addresses and configure the
filter to accept only thoses.
--
Regards,
Feli
Hallo Marten,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:30:45 +0100GMT (11-7-2007, 1:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in
Hallo Marten,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:10:27 +0100GMT (10-7-2007, 14:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in this
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in this filter.
Since there are no other filters in that account and none of the common
filters affect that
Thursday, April 26, 2007, 9:24:06 AM, you wrote:
I think address books (you can have as many as you want/need) are very
useful for this type of things because you can add and delete entries
with filter actions. In your case it would be simple with a couple of
filters. If the sender of a
Hello Tom,
I think address books (you can have as many as you want/need) are very
useful for this type of things because you can add and delete entries
with filter actions. In your case it would be simple with a couple of
filters. If the sender of a message is NOT in '1st time' AB, add him.
Hello Tom,
I would like to set up a filter to copy all incoming emails arriving
in a specific account to a new folder or ideally virtual folder
provided the sender's email is already in the original folder (ie.
use the filter to notify me that an incoming email is from a known
source as
Thursday, April 26, 2007, 2:59:12 AM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
(ie.
use the filter to notify me that an incoming email is from a known
source as opposed to be a brand-new sender). Is this possible?
Yes, it is possible in several ways.
Perhaps the easiest and most straight forward way would
Hello Tom,
sorry, I was not clear enough - the incoming emails usually are not from
known sources the first time. These are orders from customers. The
majority will be new customers and new emails but over time some will
be returning customers. These I would like to catch and review once
Monday, March 26, 2007, 12:09:43 AM, you wrote:
Hello Tom,
Sunday, March 25, 2007, 8:02:19 AM, among other things, you wrote:
T Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote:
Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote:
for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming
Tom @ 2007-3-24 1:04:43 AM
filter incoming mails according to what time they were created mid:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a
specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to
have one filter for all emails I receive that
Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote:
for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a
specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to
have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between
08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters
1 - 100 of 724 matches
Mail list logo
