Hello Tbudl,
Has anyone got this to work?
I have tried
Simple: Attachment match
Web-like: Attachment file names Search for . This is weird, it
doesn't find them in the selected account but does find them in an
unselected account.
--
Best regards,
Tony
Hello Jack,
TH>> I have opened a ticket: https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=925
> Just out of curiosity have you tried searching for just "Reporting" or even
> just
> "Report" or "MTA" by itself?
I hadn't but have now. Messa
Hello Tony,
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 you wrote:
TH> Hello Jack,
TH> Friday, September 16, 2016, 5:50:55 PM, you wrote:
>>>> Is TB! ignoring the section? I am searching for Any Part and have also
>>>> tried looking in attachments.
>> I have found t
Hello Jack,
Friday, September 16, 2016, 5:50:55 PM, you wrote:
>>> Is TB! ignoring the section? I am searching for Any Part and have also
>>> tried looking in attachments.
> I have found that "Any Part" doesn't mean any part. Try searching using
> "T
Hello Tony,
On Friday, September 16, 2016 you wrote:
TH> Hello Tony,
TH> Tuesday, August 9, 2016, 9:11:56 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello Tbudl,
>> I am searching for the string "Reporting-MTA" in the messagebase to
>> find the DSN reports. I understand tha
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, August 9, 2016, 9:11:56 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Tbudl,
> I am searching for the string "Reporting-MTA" in the messagebase to
> find the DSN reports. I understand that there are a number of
> things to search for but TB! cannot find this particular str
Hello Tbudl,
I am searching for the string "Reporting-MTA" in the messagebase to
find the DSN reports. I understand that there are a number of
things to search for but TB! cannot find this particular string.
However, I can see this string visually when viewing message source.
There
that it would be useful to have an 'Exclude
Signature' option that, when searching in Text, would stop the search at
signature delimiter dashdashspace.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6780
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.12.2
you are searching does not
contain the letter x. If you clear the search box and type a
space, presumably it can match that and subsequently your x will
change to a space instead of to targ?
Ok, that makes sense, however I find it quite confusing when compared with how
many other applications
this
happens!?
If I type in something that it can't find it automatically changes
to the last successful entry (same as bat!! would change back to
bat!). If you have the same behaviour in your version of TB!, the
above would suggest the AB or group you are searching does not
contain the letter x. If you
Hello Roelof,
As far as I can see, it searches all contacts, but as I've got just
one AB I can't say anything about its behaviour with multiple AB's.
IT seems to work just on the AB or group selected.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.71.03
Hi Roelof,
Thanks for the reply.
Thursday, March 2, 2006, 12:04:44 AM, you wrote:
It works just like the quick search toolbar in TB's main screen. Start
typing and TB will find the first match in your AB that contains the
character combination you typed, no matter whether it's in the name or
Hi all,
If I open up the address book I can see a Search box on the toolbar, however I
cannot seem to work out how to use it. If I highlight my personal address book
I would expect (probably incorrectly) that anything typed into the search box
would search across the entire address book.
Hallo Paul,
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:42:49 +GMT (1-3-2006, 21:42 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PM If I open up the address book I can see a Search box on the
PM toolbar, however I cannot seem to work out how to use it. If I
PM highlight my personal address book I would expect (probably
PM
Hello Chris,
This can be a problem for me because I will enter ALT Search Mode and
then switch folder and wonder why there don't seem to be any messages.
In case of doubt, Esc. That's what I do.
Should ALT Search Mode disable itself when switching from folder to
folder.
No.
--
Best
Hello Chris,
When I ALT-click on some entry in the message list, The Bat! goes into
what I call ALT Search Mode. This works just fine. However, there does
not seem to be any indication that The Bat! is in this mode. Is there
some visual indication of this that I am missing?
No, this is
Chris
On Thu 9 June 2005, 12:47:17 +1000, you wrote:
When I ALT-click on some entry in the message list, The Bat! goes into
what I call ALT Search Mode. This works just fine. However, there does
not seem to be any indication that The Bat! is in this mode. Is there
some visual indication of
Hello Robin,
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:20:49 +1000 GMT (09/06/2005, 11:20 +0700 GMT),
Robin Anson wrote:
RA The only visual indication I know if is that when you move your mouse
RA into the message list window a small box pops up saying
RA messages total
RAxx messages shown
RAx
Hello Ian,
Maybe a button on the Quick Search toolbar to display all messages?
OK, why not. I use and will use Esc key anyway.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.25
Current version is 3.5.25 |
MAU @ 2005-Jun-9 12:21:36 PM
Visual Indication of ALT Searching mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe a button on the Quick Search toolbar to display all messages?
OK, why not. I use and will use Esc key anyway.
Ah, but the ESC key is always pushable. However, this button would
only be active when
Hello Chris,
Ah, but the ESC key is always pushable.
Yes, like any other key on the keyboard ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5.25
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
When I ALT-click on some entry in the message list, The Bat! goes into
what I call ALT Search Mode. This works just fine. However, there does
not seem to be any indication that The Bat! is in this mode. Is there
some visual indication of this that I am missing?
This can be a problem for me
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 9:47:17 PM, you wrote:
C When I ALT-click on some entry in the message list, The Bat! goes into
C what I call ALT Search Mode. This works just fine. However, there does
C not seem to be any indication that The Bat! is in this mode. Is there
C some visual
Stuart Cuddy @ 2005-Jun-8 11:01:44 PM
Visual Indication of ALT Searching mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should ALT Search Mode disable itself when switching from folder to
folder. I can see advantages for doing so and not doing so.
No, because it is very handy to be able to search, say on a persons
Hello Martin,
On Wed, 25 May 2005 16:17:00 +0200GMT Martin Schuster wrote:
It's more or less a toggle. CTRL-* expands the threads, and CTRL-*
collapses them.
MS That might be true ;-) but neither function works here, because as
MS soon as I press CTRL-SHIFT-+ (which on my german keyboard
Hello tbudl,
I know everybody's off testing the bugs in the new version, but I'm
currently searching myself to death for a simple keyboard shortcut:
Collapse Thread (i.e. completely collapse the current thread)
An old shortcut list I have says it's ctrl-* but that does not work
on my german
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 7:51:04 AM, you wrote:
M And I can't find the item Collapse Thread in the customiser.
M Anybody knows where it hides?
It's more or less a toggle. CTRL-* expands the threads, and CTRL-*
collapses them.
M How would it be to have a quick search field in
Hello Leif,
M And I can't find the item Collapse Thread in the customiser.
M Anybody knows where it hides?
It's more or less a toggle. CTRL-* expands the threads, and CTRL-*
collapses them.
That might be true ;-) but neither function works here, because as
soon as I press CTRL-SHIFT-+ (which
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 8:17:00 AM, you wrote:
M That might be true ;-) but neither function works here, because as
M soon as I press CTRL-SHIFT-+ (which on my german keyboard means
M CTRL-*, as * is SHIFT-+ ) the thread gets expanded from the current
M point on, and is not toggled
Hello Leif,
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 8:17:00 AM, you wrote:
M That might be true ;-) but neither function works here, because as
M soon as I press CTRL-SHIFT-+ (which on my german keyboard means
M CTRL-*, as * is SHIFT-+ ) the thread gets expanded from the current
M point on, and
Hello Martin,
Myself blubbered just a few seconds ago into Leif's direction:
But: is it the same at your computer that CTRL-* collapses/expands
*all* threads, not just the one that is currently active?
Sorry, I can't read. Shortcut list says clearly:
Ctrl+* = open all the branches of all
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 10:03:03 AM, you wrote:
M But: is it the same at your computer that CTRL-* collapses/expands
M *all* threads, not just the one that is currently active?
It does. Sometimes I do CTRL-* to expand, CTRL-A to select all
messages, then CTRL-M to mark them all as
Hello TBUDL,
i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option to
search, not even in the mail headers...
Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB!
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3
Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:06 PM +0200, you wrote:
i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option
to search, not even in the mail headers...
Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB!
What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at
your
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:12:13 PM (675 Beats):
What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at
your disposal.
For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that
right?
The search dialog doesn't seem to work since there's
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:18 PM +0200, you wrote:
For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that
right?
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
The alt-click and quick searching also work.
How to use those
to normal view). The other two
don't work.
Funny too is, that i can't quoute mails with F4, i only get a blank
template - only a reply works.
The alt-click and quick searching also work.
How to use those?
Hold down the alt button while clicking on any item in the message
list. TB! will list
to normal view). The other two
don't work.
Funny too is, that i can't quoute mails with F4, i only get a blank
template - only a reply works.
The alt-click and quick searching also work.
How to use those?
Hold down the alt button while clicking on any item in the message
list. TB! will list
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3
Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
Ralph Inselsbacher wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:50:15 PM (701 Beats):
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
Oops. It sometimes works and sometimes doesn't...
--
Regards,
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:46 PM +0200, you wrote:
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the
alt-click-method (how do i return from those search results to normal
view). The other two don't work.
Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with
confidence about what you
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:50 PM +0200, you wrote:
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't
seem to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in
templates...
BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that
I simply couldn't use for
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58:04 PM (706 Beats):
Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with
confidence about what you should be experiencing. It may very well be
that the search isn't working for you since, for message body searches,
TB! queries the
Hello Ralph,
Monday, March 28, 2005, 7:46:40 AM, you wrote:
RI Well, the only search method that works for me, is the alt-click-method
RI (how do i return from those search results to normal view). The other two
RI don't work.
To get the quick search to work you first have to select a message
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:00:35 PM (708 Beats):
BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that
I simply couldn't use for IMAP.
AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now...
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Ralph,
Monday, March 28, 2005, 8:20:10 AM, you wrote:
BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that
I simply couldn't use for IMAP.
RI AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now...
Yes, I believe it is. And given that fact you may
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 4:16 PM +0200, you wrote:
That's a pity, because Thunderbird and Outlook 2003 really seem to
cache the mails because one can search.
For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't
have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for searching
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:26:03 PM (726 Beats):
For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't
have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for searching.
It queries the server. Same for Mulberry, the client I'm currently
using most
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 4:20 PM +0200, you wrote:
AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now...
Don't be. I'm the one confused. You're right!!! Sorry. :)
IMAP is always changing. It's like a sinus wave of improvements and
setbacks.
I'd say IMAP was at a peak with the
be a problem for you to retrieve all message bodies
to cache for searching.
Gotta try out the newer version you mentioned...
Yes.
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not so sure.
p7sFVYIz7sMTH.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Monday, March 28, 2005 @ 5:58:04 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
This why the search dialog just sits
there claiming the search was done and no matches found. You wait and
then the matches suddenly appear.
Ugh. This is such a bad feature. I don't know how many times I've
closed down the
Hi Matt,
On 28/3/2005 12:53 PM -0800, you wrote:
Ugh. This is such a bad feature. I don't know how many times I've
closed down the search window thinking it just wasn't working. I only
discovered this when I left it open by mistake and suddenly saw all
kinds of results on my search. At the least
Hello bats,
on Thu, 26. Feb 2004 at 00:53:16 +0100 I wrote:
I want to search with the Message Finder for mails containing
([^/]++.|) (without ) in the body, but this is not possible without
using regular expressions and escaping nearly every character.
[snip]
no comments?
--
shinE!
Hi Eddie,
EC Unfortunately I can't change the Dates and Times of my files.
EC Sometimes I need to do this also in Bulk. Does someone know any good
EC tool that can do this?
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA014830/english/FlexRena/
Flexible Renamer - freeware and tons of features. (Don't be put
Marck-
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 1:41:58 AM, you wrote:
MDP This thread is firmly in the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this
MDP on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain
MDP threading.)
Hey - not fair! If I remember correctly here this topic is about
flagging the
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 11:58:10 AM, you wrote:
Mark Hey - not fair! If I remember correctly here this topic is about
Mark flagging the attributes of stored email messages. That seems to
Mark me to be very much on-topic, as a workaround for changing the
Mark subject line and such.
Hi Eddie,
on Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:05:09 +0100GMT, you wrote:
EC Quite some times back I got a useful tip for a tool to Rename and
EC Manipulate Filenames in bulk (Flash Renamer).
EC Unfortunately I can't change the Dates and Times of my files.
EC Sometimes I need to do this also in Bulk. Does
EC Quite some times back I got a useful tip for a tool to Rename and
EC Manipulate Filenames in bulk (Flash Renamer).
Name It Your Way is a pretty decent bulk file renamer, that is highly
configurable. Check it out here: http://www.niyow.com
~Mike
Hi,
* Marck D Pearlstone, Monday, March 1, 2004, 8:16:01 PM:
Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make
any difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being
courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is
added to your signature by the
be able to search for special characters.
..just tried a search for '++' (without ') and 471 messages showed up,
where the majority had no '++' in them.
All was searching in body only, with no advanced settings ('Search for
whole words only' did not help either).
Bugs? Misunderstanding
Is there any way of searching within the log file in TB?
I know I could copy and paste the file to a word processor, but I'd
rather search the log file itself.
I tried F7, but that doesn't work, nor does the Windows search which
is normally invoked by CTRL-F.
I using TB 2.01.3 Business edition
On Sunday, January 25, 2004, Roelof Otten wrote:
You can access the log file from disk in:
C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Mail\Accountname\Account.log
Accountname needs to be substituted with the name of the account.
On my system I've associated .log files with Notepad, so double
clicking does
Is there any way of searching within the log file in TB?
I know I could copy and paste the file to a word processor, but I'd
rather search the log file itself.
I tried F7, but that doesn't work.
Thanks for any help.
--
Mike
Current version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
be of interest. The links took the form
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
that string in the search box on the archive page you get no messages!
I have looked for the
Dear Stuart,
@23-Jan-2004, 09:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
SH MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
SH be of interest. The links took the form
SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
SH that string in the search box on
Hello Marck,
Perhaps MAU would be able to supply you with references to the
mail-archive messages? That would be quite a bit of extra work for
him though. Or you can fire up TB and use the mid URLs.
That's what I did in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MDP Or you can fire up TB and use the mid URLs.
But I don't have the messages (I've already tried that).
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from
Hello Marck,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 1:19:12 PM, you wrote:
MDP Dear Stuart,
MDP @23-Jan-2004, 09:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SH] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
SH MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
SH be of interest. The links took the form
SH
Dear Jean,
@23-Jan-2004, 15:04 +0100 (23-Jan 14:04 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
SH that string in the search box on the archive page you get no messages!
MDP These links are for use within TB only.
...
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 3:17:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sec Clearly I'm not getting it right (again). Anyone able to off this hard
sec of thinking lad a hand?
Just click on the URL in the quote box for each message in the archives.
,- [
Good afternoon list,
Sorry too post this here but yahoo deleted my account and now i
have to join my groups again. However, i can't find the tbot group
anymore. Yahoo comes up with a non-exist. Can somebody post a direct
link?
--
Best regards,
Luc
http://www.dzinelabs.com
Hallo Luc,
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:10:27 +0100GMT (2-1-04, 16:10 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
L However, i can't find the tbot group anymore. Yahoo comes up with a
L non-exist. Can somebody post a direct link?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Good afternoon Roelof,
It was foretold that on 2-1-2004 @ 16:28:36 GMT+0100 (which was
16:28:36 where I live) Roelof Otten would mumble:
snipped a bit
RO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tnx :-)
--
Best regards,
Luc
http://www.dzinelabs.com
---
Powered by
Hello rich,
Friday, November 7, 2003, 2:14:43 PM, you wrote:
In trying to find them I run a search set as:
Check the Anywhere box
Enter the search string amazon password
Choose folders these messages are known to be in
No hits are returned. Any ideas?
Silly question:
Hello Batters!
I have a number of emails that contain the 2 strings amazon AND password. The
strings may (or may not) both be in the body OR subject, etc. I need to find the most
recent one so I know what my current password is!
In trying to find them I run a search set as:
Check the
Hello rich,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:14:43 -0500 GMT (08/11/2003, 03:14 +0700 GMT),
rich gregory wrote:
In trying to find them I run a search set as:
Check the Anywhere box
Enter the search string amazon password
Choose folders these messages are known to be in
No hits are
Hello Marck,
ZA Is it possible to perform a search To, Subject, Body...
ZA seperately in the Find Message window, like in the OE?
Not currently. I hope it's on the development roadmap though. I'd
like to see that added.
I'd wish it was possible too. The work-around I use is using a
Hello,
Is it possible to perform a search To, Subject, Body...
seperately in the Find Message window, like in the OE?
For example, I want to do a search with body containing x, with
sender y.
--
Best regards,
Zeynel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
Hi Zeynel,
@5-Nov-2003, 23:14 +0200 (05-Nov 21:14 UK time) Zeynel A. Öztürk
[ZA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ZA Is it possible to perform a search To, Subject, Body...
ZA seperately in the Find Message window, like in the OE?
Not currently. I hope it's on the development roadmap though.
Hello Cedric,
Yes, in fact, it seems that it's the advanced option which doesn't
work. If i select case sensitive, I got the same answer... Is there
something special to do to make it works ?
I have no idea what your problem may be, it just seems to work here
without doing anything special.
Hello Cedric,
Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 6:13:11 PM, you wrote:
CF Is it me or is there a problem in search function ?
CF If I look for CTI in subject in different folders, it returns a lot
CF of non accurate answers... Is it the same for you (using The Bat!
CF 2.01). Is the search string too
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 6:23:34 PM, you wrote:
Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I have to
check them all or is there a faster way to do it ?
M Ctrl+Click on the parent folder.
Where is it you are Ctrl-clicking? I don't see anywhere in the
message
Hello Adam,
Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I have to
check them all or is there a faster way to do it ?
M Ctrl+Click on the parent folder.
Where is it you are Ctrl-clicking? I don't see anywhere in the
message Finder that makes sense.
That's because you are
Hello !
Is it me or is there a problem in search function ?
If I look for CTI in subject in different folders, it returns a lot
of non accurate answers... Is it the same for you (using The Bat!
2.01). Is the search string too short ?
Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I
Hello Cedric,
Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I have to
check them all or is there a faster way to do it ?
Ctrl+Click on the parent folder.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01
Winamp OFF:
Hello all,
Wednesday, October 15, 2003, Cedric Fontaine wrote:
Hello !
Is it me or is there a problem in search function ?
If I look for CTI in subject in different folders, it returns a lot
of non accurate answers... Is it the same for you (using The Bat!
2.01). Is the search string too
Hello Cedric,
Is it me or is there a problem in search function ?
If I look for CTI in subject in different folders, it returns a lot
of non accurate answers... Is it the same for you (using The Bat!
2.01). Is the search string too short ?
It seems to be working fine here.
--
Best regards,
Hi Cedric
Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 4:43:11 PM, you wrote:
CF Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I have to
CF check them all or is there a faster way to do it ?
Checking the account name usually selects all folders and subfolders. I can't
help if you'd rather only
Hello,
Also, if I want to search in a folder and all sub-folders I have to
check them all or is there a faster way to do it ?
use right mouse click for opening Pop-up menu with options for
selecting/unselecting folders and accounts.
Great, that's what I was looking for... Thanks
--
Bonjour !
Le 15 octobre 2003 à 16:55:30, vous écriviez :
It seems to be working fine here.
Yes, in fact, it seems that it's the advanced option which doesn't
work. If i select case sensitive, I got the same answer... Is there
something special to do to make it works ?
--
Cedric -
the quotes), it eventually found 550+ messages that matched.
Too many.
CM What I found was that the hits were actually for either business or
CM plan, but not the phrase business plan. After referring to the Help,
CM I tried business plan (without the quotes) and got about 50 hits.
CM But searching thru
was that the hits were actually for either business or
plan, but not the phrase business plan. After referring to the Help,
I tried business plan (without the quotes) and got about 50 hits.
But searching thru the messages in the results pane showed that most
hits were still only for a single word
Hello Chris,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 19:56:40 -0600 GMT (10/03/03, 08:56 +0700 GMT),
Chris Montgomery wrote:
I tried business plan (without the quotes) and got about 50 hits.
But searching thru the messages in the results pane showed that most
hits were still only for a single word, e.g. business
Howdy Thomas,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 9:12:38 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Have you tried businessplan, i.e. without the blanks?
No, I didn't before, but I just tried it and that didn't give me the
results I wanted. After trying a few more things, I found that searching
for the phrase business
I went to Mozilla mail for some time and really liked--no, LOVED--the
ability to type a string at the top of a message list and instantly
have the msg list filtered to only msgs that contained that string in
the subject or sender...
The Quick Search has always been frustrating b/c there's no find
Estimados seguidores del tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com:
En relación a lo que Aaron en su momento posteó:
AG The Quick Search has always been frustrating b/c there's no find
AG next...
The quick search has a find next open the quick search, write your
saearch, when you find anything, only
Task,
TC The quick search has a find next open the quick search, write
TC your saearch, when you find anything, only press [CTRL]+[ENTER]
Oh :)
But it's still nice instantly to see all 50 msgs that might contain
that text b/c then you can find immediately exactly what it is you
wanted to find!
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:44:42[GMT +0100] (4:44 PM EDST) Marck D
Pearlstone wrote:
All for the sake of a thoughtlessly formatted four word reply you've
earned yourself a trouting :-).
stock lecture SNIP
I hesitate to do it again, but thank you very much Marck. It's your
list so I'll make an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@20-Aug-2002, 14:41 -0400 (19:41 UK time) Daniel Grunberg [DG] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
DG Putting my thanks to Elaine above what I quoted was the quickest
DG way I could think of to show that my thanks
Is there a way to search for a text pattern within a message? What I'm
looking for would be something like the Find/Find Next capability of
WordPad.
Using The Bat! v1.60q/Post3
on Windows 95 4.0 Build B
--
Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage:
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
