Ciao The,
This is from FaxNow online DOC:
MAPI Configuration
The FaxNow! computer needs to be able to send emails without any user intervention.
For this reason,
the mail setup is critical to successful email support.
There are some key points to consider when configuring email support on
Hallo Stefano,
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:30:00 +0100 GMT (31/12/2000, 16:30 +0800 GMT),
Stefano Zamprogno wrote:
SZ MAPI Configuration
[...]
SZ Automated Security
[...]
SZ Address Book Synchronisation
[...]
This sounds awfully complicated. Have your tried www.faxsav.com
instead? While I still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello George!
On Saturday, December 30, 2000 at 11:07:15 PM you wrote:
Most lists, except this one, and most BSD/Linux/UNIX do use and
condone HTML formatted E-mail
And where do *you* get your statistics made up? Or are you actually
This message: 30/12/2000 22:29 GMT.
Hello Wayne,
A reminder of what Wayne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
30 December 2000 at 12:25:40 GMT -0800
WB I have had the same problems with the backup feature so I still
WB use my compression program (Rar) to backup the whole Bat directory
WB and
Hello TBUDL,
I seem to be unable to open/close all threads in a folder with the
"Ctrl + *"-shortcut. The reason for this could be that I am using TB
with danish keyboards. But I suspect that the reason is that I do not
understand this type of shortcut.
And so, my questions are:
1. Does "Ctrl +
Hello Jannik,
(JL == "Jannik Lindquist") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JL I seem to be unable to open/close all threads in a folder with the
JL "Ctrl + *"-shortcut. The reason for this could be that I am using
JL TB with danish keyboards. But I suspect that the reason is that I
JL do not
I have noticed that The Bat! makes a copy of outgoing attachments in the
"attach" folder of the account from which the e-mail is sent. It even
changes the name of the attachment from, e.g., Mydoc.doc to
Mydoc1.doc.
I find that duplication totally unnecesary. Apart from the fact that it
is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Remi,
On 31 December 2000 at 15:22:55 +0200 (which was 13:22 where I
live) Remi Pach wrote and made these points:
RP I have noticed that The Bat! makes a copy of outgoing attachments in the
RP "attach" folder of the account from which the e-mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 2:03:31 AM, you wrote:
DH And where do *you* get your statistics made up? Or are you actually
DH subscribed to *all* lists so you can rightfully make the statement
DH above?
Actually my statistics are coming from
Hello Jannik others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, you stated regarding using TB! commands
(shortcuts) w/ keyboards other than English:
JL I seem to be unable to open/close all threads in a folder with the
JL "Ctrl + *"-shortcut. The reason for this could be that
Hello Remi others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, you stated regarding your noticing "that
The Bat! makes a copy of outgoing attachments in the "attach"
folder", opining that you find "that duplication totally
unnecessary."
I agree. And that's why, in the account's
On December 31, 2000, at 9:07:17 AM, Douglas Hinds Wrote:
DH I agree. And that's why, in the account's preferences under Files
DH and Directories, I have "Bind attachments only when sending out
DH mail" checked.
I've been using TB! for a while now, and I still do not know what "Bind
attachments
On December 31, 2000, at 6:41:44 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
MDP TB employs the other method by default for good reason - it serves as
MDP a record of what was sent because original files can be changed after
MDP they have gone. What would be the point of keeping a copy of the sent
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
On 31 December 2000 at 09:53:08 -0800 (which was 17:53 where I
live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points:
NA If I send myself a test message to include a small *.PNG file, TB!
NA will pull the file out of it's original Folder and
Hello Nick others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, you stated regarding Marck's comment:
MDP TB employs the other method by default for good reason - it serves as
MDP a record of what was sent because original files can be changed after
MDP they have gone. ...
NA
On December 31, 2000, at 10:45:13 AM, Douglas Hinds Wrote:
DH I think Marck means that keeping with the message separately is a
DH legally demonstrable proof of what was sent (i.e a contract, for
DH instance).
Yes, I understand the logic now, thanks to you and Marck. I just wish TB!
wouldn't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Nick,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 11:06:28 AM, you wrote:
NA Yes, I understand the logic now, thanks to you and Marck. I just wish
TB!
NA wouldn't be so ambiguous in their use of language. I now have the
option
NA "Bind attachments..." checked, but I
On 31-12-2000 at 11:06:28GMT -0800 (which was 19:06 where I live)
Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "Outgoing attachments"
Nick I just wish TB!
Nick wouldn't be so ambiguous in their use of language
Hello Nick,
This is the biggest stumble block for the new TB user. And the help
Hello Nick,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 8:53:08 PM, you wrote:
NA On December 31, 2000, at 6:41:44 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
MDP TB employs the other method by default for good reason - it serves as
MDP a record of what was sent because original files can be changed after
MDP they have
Dear TBUDLers,
On behalf of RITLABS, I wish you all the best in the upcoming
year and Millennium. Let all your wishes (not only related to The
Bat! and especially version 2 :-) will come true in the new year!
Thank you very much for your support!
Good luck!
--
Stefan
Hello Nick others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, you stated regarding what I said Marck meant:
DH I think Marck means that keeping with the message separately is a
DH legally demonstrable proof of what was sent (i.e a contract, for
DH instance).
NA Yes, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On December 31, 2000, at 11:59:42 AM, Stefan Tanurkov Wrote:
ST Let all your wishes (not only related to The Bat! and especially version
ST 2 :-) will come true in the new year!
And a Happy New Year to you Stefan... and all of your Staff. It's been tough
Hi
This is not causing any major problems, but I
thought I'd just check to see if anyone has a solution.
Whenever I receive an email in TBcontaining a
link, and then double click on that link to display it in IE5, the page doesn't
get reloaded (if I've previously visited it).In both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Marck,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 11:48:33 AM, you wrote:
MDP Just a quick note to point out that this "bad wrapping" is caused by
MDP PGP. When used with TB, it is best to turn off PGP's line wrapping
MDP completely since TB does its' own
Hello George,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 5:16:08 PM, you wrote:
MDP Just a quick note to point out that this "bad wrapping" is caused by
MDP PGP. When used with TB, it is best to turn off PGP's line wrapping
MDP completely since TB does its' own line break formatting before PGP
MDP
On 31-12-2000 at 13:47:25GMT -0800 (which was 21:47 where I live)
Nick Andriash wrote regarding the subject of "Happy New Millennium!"
Nick May the year 2001 bring us Version 2.0 and a Plugin for PGP 7.0.
Hello Nick,
AMEN!!
Regards
--
Manfred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On December 31, 2000, at 5:26:13 PM, George F. Schoelles Wrote:
GFS Ooops, got it not though too late. However, TB's editor apply's way
GFS too much hard formatting to my text. I would prefer that it only
GFS wrapped my view of the text without any other
On 31 December, 2000, 8:46 PM, I saw Nick's comments made on
Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:36:05 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
NA Just curious George, but how did you manage to PGP sign only your
NA portion of the above message, and not the quoted material?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Hello Nick,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 5:36:05 PM, you wrote:
NA Just curious George, but how did you manage to PGP sign only your portion of
NA the above message, and not the quoted material?
NA In any case, what Marck was referring to was your PGP wrap setting. Because
NA the TB! Editor is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Austin,
On 01 January 2001 at 00:59:28 - (which was 00:59 where I
live) Austin Dennis wrote and made these points:
AD This is not causing any major problems, but I thought I'd just
AD check to see if anyone has a solution.
Please do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi George,
On 01 January 2001 at 17:51:27 -0800 (which was 01:51 where I
live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points:
GFS 3 I have it set for 6 columns greater and still have the problem.
"It"? TB or PGP? PGP must be TB and you must
Hello Marck,
Sunday, December 31, 2000, 7:59:31 PM, you wrote:
MDP On 01 January 2001 at 17:51:27 -0800 (which was 01:51 where I
MDP live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points:
GFS 3 I have it set for 6 columns greater and still have the problem.
MDP "It"? TB or PGP? PGP must be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi George,
On 01 January 2001 at 20:12:50 -0800 (which was 04:12 where I
live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points:
GFS 3I need more info on (Alt-L).
Position the cursor in a quoted block of text (preferably using cursor
keys
33 matches
Mail list logo
