Re: UNSUBSCRIBE TBUDL

PL> UNSUBSCRIBE OK, guys, now I am calm and will not overreact, I will just: : -- Best regards, Lija Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 95 4.0 Build B -- __ Archives : Moderators :

Re[7]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Hi Gerry, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, at 18:30:17 [GMT -0500, your local time] (17.2.2001. at 00:30 was my local time), you wrote: GD> I am writing this to you off forum. In my humble opinion, you have done Belive it or not, but you have sent this TO forum :)) GD> far more damage to the forum than P

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 17 February 2001 at 12:48:17 +0800 (which was 04:48 where I live) Thomas wrote and made these points: MY>> I suggested that the moderators do this in order to prevent just such MY>> a multiple spawning. T> I'm with Karin here, becau

Re: POP before SMTP

Hallo Deniz, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:05:05 +0200 GMT (16/02/2001, 23:05 +0800 GMT), Deniz Baygan wrote: >> But here is the second window popping up, entitled: "Receiving Mail". >> Oops, did I check Combined Delivery? No, unchecked. Closed TB and >> reopen. Option still unchecked, but when I hit

Re: Strange deleting

Hallo Lija, On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:10:19 +0100 GMT (15/02/2001, 16:10 +0800 GMT), Lija wrote: MK>>> But what about messages I want to leave on the server? Ie large MK>>> messages I want to receive in job place, but small at home only??? Ai>> Take a look at TBUDLs archive. There is a sol

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

Hallo Mike, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:48:39 -0500 GMT (17/02/2001, 09:48 +0800 GMT), Mike Yetto wrote: KS>> While I do realise that in this way we suddenly might see KS>> two new threads emerge, or perhaps even three, when more KS>> people answer and create new threads, I don't think it's KS>> fair

Kill Filter (was: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE!)

Hallo syv, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:57:56 -0800 GMT (17/02/2001, 08:57 +0800 GMT), syv wrote: s> How do you make a kill file? or are you talking about a s> filter to the trash based on sender? Account / Sorting Office / Selective downlaod Filters. Look around in the tabs, it gives you a lot of o

Re: Documenation woes

Hallo Lyle, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:37:05 -0700 GMT (17/02/2001, 07:37 +0800 GMT), Lyle Scully wrote: LS>>> Thanks for listening to my rant. I love The Bat! and would pay LS>>> again for the honor of using it, but someone needs to work on the LS>>> documentation sooner rather than later. MDP>> n

UNSUBSCRIBE TBUDL

Hello TBUDL UNSUBSCRIBE -- Regards, (patl) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, February 16, 2001 20:17:41 (-0800 GNT/UTC) The Bat! v.1.49 -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List:

Re[6]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lija, L> Jesus, what a jerk you are!! Are you fucking lunatic? L> Do you consider that these forums are some playground for idiots like you? L> To Moderators: L> I know, I was too rude, but please take some action against cretins like this L>

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

On 17-02-2001 at 03:01, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote: > Mike Yetto wrote and made these points: [how to deal with new postings that are actually sent as a reply to an existing thread - one needs to start a new tread on one's reply] > but you have to change both the Subject and the Follow-up

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karin, On 17 February 2001 at 02:34:18 +0100 (which was 01:34 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote and made these points: >> Does anyone have something else for the moderators to think about >> this weekend? KS> What about sex, life and the meanin

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, On 17 February 2001 at 19:41:28 -0500 (which was 00:41 where I live) Mike Yetto wrote and made these points: MY> However, many people do reply to the last message they MY> read rather than creating a new thread and my question conce

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE!)

Hi Marck, On Friday, February 16, 2001 01:17:15 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'DEAD HORSE (was Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE!)': Marck> [...] I believe that I have said what was necessary on this Marck> topic to those directly concerned. Now IMHO what we are doing Marck> is b

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, at 02:34:18 [GMT +0100], Karin Spaink wrote: KS> I'd suggest that whoever answers to such a message, takes KS> the effort to turn their reply into a new message, thereby KS> achieving the goal: the ensuing thread will be pulled o

Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Friday, February 16, 2001, 8:25:42 PM, you wrote: NA> Ben, it sounds like you have already hit the Reply button, and *then* NA> you are highlighting the text you want to quote. In that case, F4 will NA> indeed spell check the highlighted text. Try just reading the message in NA> the preview pa

Re: Moderators: Point of Order

On 17-02-2001 at 01:41, Mike Yetto kindly wrote: > many people do reply to the last message they read > rather than creating a new thread Fortunately, it is not many people who do so. > and my question concerns the proper > way to handle this. Should the moderators immediately start a new > th

Quoting Selected Text (was DO NOT OVERQUOTE)

On February 16, 2001, at 5:15:33 PM, Ben Mills Wrote: BM> Please elaborate: When I highlight a block to snip and hit F4TB BM> spellchecks it. W BM> What am I doing wrong??? Ben, it sounds like you have already hit the Reply button, and *then* you are highlighting the text you want to quote.

Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

On February 16, 2001, at 5:15:33 PM, Ben Mills Wrote: BM> Please elaborate: When I highlight a block to snip and hit F4TB BM> spellchecks it. W BM> What am I doing wrong??? Ben, it sounds like you have already hit the Reply button, and *then* you are highlighting the text you want to quote.

DEAD HORSE (was Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE!)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 17 February 2001 at 19:50:40 -0500 (which was 00:50 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: JR> As for me, I can't accept this behavior or the casual apology to JR> the list & I think he should be banned, not warned. Sinc

Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:26:59 PM, you wrote: MY> I'm more inclined to go with "confused Outlook Express user" than MY> jerk. The Bat! will allow you to bottom post and, more importantly[1], MY> trim the quotes by selecting a block and hitting F4. Looko

Re[7]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:50:40 PM, you wrote: JR> Hello Listers. JR> On Friday, February 16, 2001 23:53:58 [ +0100 GMT], Lija wrote the JR> following in regards to 'Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing JR> Outlook Contacts)': /Snip/ Lija>> To Moderators: Lija>> I know, I was too rud

Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

On Friday, February 16, 2001 , Nick Andriash wrote the following in regards to: [Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)] NA> Not accepted! You are the first to cause me to make NA> a Kill File on this List, and your are, or course, NA> it's first member! How do you make a ki

Re: Incoming mail sound when filtering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ray, On 16 February 2001 at 00:40:59 +0100 (which was 23:40 where I live) Ray Selby wrote and made these points: RS> However, the sound is played as the mail is received in the RS> Account1 Inbox, presumably before the filter kicks in and sends

Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 6:26 PM Mike Yetto tickled the keyboard keys on the subject of: "Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)". My response follows: MY> more importantly[1], MY> trim the quotes by selecting a block and hitting F4 Thank you for this little tip

Re[6]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Hello Listers. On Friday, February 16, 2001 23:53:58 [ +0100 GMT], Lija wrote the following in regards to 'Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)': Lija> Jesus, what a jerk you are!! Are you fucking lunatic? Do you Lija> consider that these forums are some playground for id

Moderators: Point of Order

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Bat! listers, Jan just sent a reminder about blank subjects and that prompted me to ask this question. Please note that I didn't reply to the other thread. However, many people do reply to the last message they read rather than

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

On 17-02-2001 at 01:18, Mike Yetto kindly wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, at 15:54:44 [GMT +0100], Jannik Lindquist wrote: JL>> You are quite right, but I thought that it would be easier to export JL>> from OL to OE and then to TB - than to export to a CSV-format and JL>> fiddle with fields :-) >

Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, at 15:16:06 [GMT -0800], Peter Chiou wrote: PC> And you're right, it is because I often am a jerk that I need Jesus, PC> as you said. I'm more inclined to go with "confused Outlook Express user" than jerk. The Bat! will all

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 4:18:55 PM, Mike Yetto Wrote: MY> As another thought, can't you export the Outlook contacts a vCards and MY> then import them to TB!? Yes... You sure should be. Never thought of that. Good find *again* Mike! :o) Nick N.J

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, at 15:54:44 [GMT +0100], Jannik Lindquist wrote: JL> You are quite right, but I thought that it would be easier to export JL> from OL to OE and then to TB - than to export to a CSV-format and JL> fiddle with fields :-) When I ex

Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Hi Lija, I never have read such aggressive in this group! I wonder if you know that your reaction might have caused more traffic than Peter will be able to do with his quotes ... just think before blame others ... -- so long Thomas Petrich -- _

Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lija, On 16 February 2001 at 23:53:58 +0100 (which was 22:53 where I live) Lija wrote and made these points: L> Jesus, what a jerk you are!! No name calling. No personal insults. L> Are you ** lunatic? No swearing. L> Do you conside

Re[2]: Documenation woes

Hello Marck, Friday, February 16, 2001, 3:41:06 PM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi Lyle, MDP> On 16 February 2001 at 15:15:16 -0700 (which was 22:15 where I live) MDP> Lyle Scully wrote and made these points: LS>> When asked if I thought that Bat

Re[2]: Documenation woes

Hello Nick, Friday, February 16, 2001, 3:32:59 PM, you wrote: NA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- NA> Hash: SHA1 NA> On February 16, 2001, at 2:15:16 PM, Lyle Scully Wrote: LS>> I am the CTO for a medium sized ISP here in the US, and 90% of my LS>> clients are businesses that don't have tim

Incoming mail sound when filtering

Hi TBUDL, I have a sound configured for incoming mail for account Account1. I have set a filter, which sends this mail to a mailbox in account Account2 (no sound configured). However, the sound is played as the mail is received in the Account1 Inbox, presumably before the filter kicks

Re: Documenation woes

On February 16, 2001, at 3:26:47 PM, Karin Spaink Wrote: KS> I don't think that Lyle is talking about his collegues. He's KS> talking about the ISP customers - and fortunately, ISPs do KS> not have access to their clients' workstations ;-) Yes, you are absolutely right Karin... I should have rea

Re[2]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, NA> Not accepted! You are the first to cause me to make a Kill File on this NA> List, and your are, or course, it's first member! I concur and am doing the same. Best regards, Gerry Doyon 1.49 running on Windows 98 41998 -BEGIN P

Re: Documenation woes

On 16-02-2001 at 23:32, Nick Andriash kindly wrote: > On February 16, 2001, at 2:15:16 PM, Lyle Scully Wrote: LS>> I am the CTO for a medium sized ISP here in the US, and 90% of my LS>> clients are businesses that don't have time to sit and fiddle with a LS>> program to figure it out. > Yes, I t

Re: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 2:53:58 PM, Lija Wrote: L> I apologize to other subscribers! Not accepted! You are the first to cause me to make a Kill File on this List, and your are, or course, it's first member! Nick N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP

Re[6]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

Hello Lija, Friday, February 16, 2001, 2:53:58 PM, you wrote: Lija> Jesus, what a jerk you are!! Are you fucking lunatic? Lija> Do you consider that these forums are some playground for idiots like you? -- My sincerest apologies as I was only learning to use TB! Frankly, un

Re[5]: Peter, DO NOT OVERQUOTE! (was: Importing Outlook Contacts)

PC> Yes, you're right. sorry. Jesus, what a jerk you are!! Are you fucking lunatic? Do you consider that these forums are some playground for idiots like you? To Moderators: I know, I was too rude, but please take some action against cretins like this guy was! I apologize to other subscriber

Re: Documenation woes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lyle, On 16 February 2001 at 15:15:16 -0700 (which was 22:15 where I live) Lyle Scully wrote and made these points: LS> When asked if I thought that Bat would be good for my client LS> though, I almost always say No. Why would I do that if it i

Re: Documenation woes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 2:27:39 PM, Peter Chiou Wrote: PC> Hear hear. That would be great indeed. I am also in the same boat - PC> would love to recommend it but hesitate due to lack of documentation. Yes Peter, but look how far you've come in a

Re: Documenation woes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 2:15:16 PM, Lyle Scully Wrote: LS> I am the CTO for a medium sized ISP here in the US, and 90% of my LS> clients are businesses that don't have time to sit and fiddle with a LS> program to figure it out. The lack of even remo

Re: Documenation woes

Hello Lyle, Friday, February 16, 2001, 2:15:16 PM, you wrote: Lyle> I love The Bat! and would pay again Lyle> for the honor of using it, but someone needs to work on the Lyle> documentation sooner rather than later. -- Hear hear. That would be great indeed. I am also in the sam

Documenation woes

Hello Everyone, Every day I get asked about alternatives to Eudora, Outlook, or Netscape, and what I use. When I tell them that I use The Bat! they are very curious why I don't use one of the above. When I tell them my reasons (Eudora - Slow and buggy, suffering from useless features. Outlook - a

Re[2]: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi Mark, On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 15:33:13 + Mark wrote on "Importing Outlook Contacts": >> http://www.internettrash.com/users/zakharin/ MA> Excellent tip, looks like a neat program, perhaps there should be a MA> link from TB! FAQ As a matter of fact, I got the tip from the Germ

Re: Updated PGP Plugin for 6.5.8?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 16 February 2001 at 12:31:50 -0800 (which was 20:31 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points: NA> Has anyone contacted RITLabs as to the possibility of coming out NA> with an updated PGP Plugin for 6.5.8 at least? I wro

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi , Friday, February 16, 2001, 3:33:13 PM, you wrote: >> beta-version of a programme - called "Dawn" - that *will* export from >> OL to TB (and from and to myriads of other AB's): >> http://www.internettrash.com/users/zakharin/ > Excellent tip, looks like a neat program, perhaps there shou

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 16 February 2001 at 12:20:11 -0800 (which was 20:20 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and made these points: MDP>> Filters are applied *while importing received messages*. MDP>> Messages that are placed in the inbox of another account

Updated PGP Plugin for 6.5.8?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone contacted RITLabs as to the possibility of coming out with an updated PGP Plugin for 6.5.8 at least? By "updated", I mean one in which the correct version of PGP is shown, along with a change in the verification process such that the antiqu

Re: Inserting .jpg image in email...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 16 February 2001 at 11:45:00 -0800 (which was 19:45 where I live) Peter Chiou wrote and made these points: PC>Is there a way to paste an image into an email? I know TB! doesn't PC>generate html messages but pasting it as

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 7:11:10 AM, Shahar Wrote: S> Instead of retrieve my mailing list messages to my main account, S> where my filters are, I retrieve it to my second account. In my S> second account I have a single filter that moves every messag

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

On February 16, 2001, at 11:31:53 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote: MDP> Filters are applied *while importing received messages*. Messages that MDP> are placed in the inbox of another account by a filter will *not* be MDP> filtered again. What about right clicking the Inbox after the messages have

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

Marck, > The only other thing you can do is to manually re-filter the account 1 > inbox. Thank you Marck and Nick for your help. Hope to find another solution. Thanks. -- __ Archives : Moderators :

Inserting .jpg image in email...

Hello tbUDL, Is there a way to paste an image into an email? I know TB! doesn't generate html messages but pasting it as an attachment without saving the image first would be helpful. Best regards, Peter -- __ Archives : <

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shahar, On 16 February 2001 at 17:11:10 +0200 (which was 15:11 where I live) Shahar wrote and made these points: S> Since this change my filters, In my main account, does not respond S> and all my mailing list messages remain in my main account

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 9:38:47 AM, Shahar Wrote: S> I did it but still no change. Ok, then let's look at what criteria you are using to filter that mail. Just so I understand what you are doing: You receive Mailing List Mail from Account B, and fi

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

Nick, S>> Since this change my filters, In my main account, does not respond S>> and all my mailing list messages remain in my main account inbox. > Check the filter that moves the Mailing List messages over, and make > sure you have checked "Continue Processing With Other Filters" which you > w

Re[4]: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Wolfgang, Friday, February 16, 2001, 6:11:18 PM, you wrote: > I still do not understand why this is such a problem for you. > The pop-window comes up and disappears shortly after - so what? it's just *disturbing* me and *useless* > If I think

Re[3]: POP before SMTP

Hi Deniz, ... DB> I just want 1 window to open as it is since 1.47 DB> This may be a bug or at least a forgotten issue. I still do not understand why this is such a problem for you. The pop-window comes up and disappears shortly after - so what? If I think about it: the new approach looks quite

Re: Need help. Filters doesn't work.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 16, 2001, at 7:11:10 AM, Shahar Wrote: S> Since this change my filters, In my main account, does not respond S> and all my mailing list messages remain in my main account inbox. Check the filter that moves the Mailing List messages over,

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi Jannik, Friday, February 16, 2001, 2:54:44 PM, you wrote: > Apparently the original problem has now been solved - but for the sake > of the general TB-enlightenment I add another address. This is to a > beta-version of a programme - called "Dawn" - that *will* export from > OL to TB (and from

Re[2]: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Thomas, Friday, February 16, 2001, 4:23:55 AM, you wrote: > I just played with it a bit. > You are right, two windows are being opened. > The first one is entitled "Delivering Mail". The first action this > does is "Connecting to POP Server".

Need help. Filters doesn't work.

Hello TB! fellows. I have two accounts. One is my main email address and the second is dedicated to all my mailing list messages, I get all my messages to the second account. In my first account I have a special directory with subdirectories for my lists subjects and filters that moves new mail t

Re[2]: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hello Mark, Friday, February 16, 2001, 10:03:24 AM, you wrote: PC>>> Ok, there has to be a way for a new Bat user like me to import all my PC>>> outlook contacts into TB all at one time. >> Go to the Ritlabs beta-page and download the tool called "Wab2Ldif". It converts >> the standard win

Re: Note to Moderators (no subjects)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 16 February 2001 at 08:38:33 -0500 (which was 13:38 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: JR> When I first started on this list, I would, on occasion, subject JR> my msgs "a simple question" & was *properly* lambasted

Note to Moderators (no subjects)

Hello TB Moderators. When I first started on this list, I would, on occasion, subject my msgs "a simple question" & was *properly* lambasted for not providing a meaningful subject line for the convenience of other list members. Over time I have recognized the "truth" of this courtesy w

Re: Syncing with Palm Addresses ... was Importing Outlook Contacts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, On 16 February 2001 at 08:05:00 -0500 (which was 13:05 where I live) Tim Musson wrote and made these points: PC>>> Do you know of a way to sync your address book in TB! with a Palm PC>>> device? MDP>> This topic is covered in the FAQ. TM

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi Thomas, Friday, February 16, 2001, 9:13:05 AM, you wrote: > Wow. Someone told me the MS products are for people who know not much > about computers. I have never used OL or OE, but what you say there > sounds so complicated that I'd rather use The Bat!. Thanks for scaring > me off of MS. MS

Re[2]: Syncing with Palm Addresses ... was Importing Outlook Contacts

Hey Marck, Friday, February 16, 2001, 5:40:37 AM, you wrote: PC>> Do you know of a way to sync your address book in TB! with a Palm PC>> device? MDP> This topic is covered in the FAQ. Did I miss it in the Archive? If you are referring to the Palm Sync part of the FAQ I wrote, it only does mai

Re: Autoresponder template: how do I make one?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Confusion, On 16 February 2001 at 18:47:37 +1000 (which was 08:47 where I live) Confusion Feedback wrote and made these points: CF> People send me messages, via an online form, often requesting CF> information from a drop-down list of *lots* of

Re[2]: Importing Outlook Contacts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Batpersons, On or about, Friday, February 16, 2001, 9:13:05 AM, we have reason to believe that Thomas wrote: T> Wow. Someone told me the MS products are for people who know not much T> about computers. I have never used OL or OE, but what you sa

Re: Check Name

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 16 February 2001 at 22:56:36 -0800 (which was 06:56 where I live) Peter Chiou wrote and made these points: PC> ... In Outlook ... ... Is there a similar function in PC> TB? Yes - there is an *exact* equivalent to this function: . H

Re: Syncing with Palm Addresses ... was Importing Outlook Contacts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 16 February 2001 at 23:54:29 -0800 (which was 07:54 where I live) Peter Chiou wrote and made these points: PC> Do you know of a way to sync your address book in TB! with a Palm PC> device? This topic is covered in the FAQ. - -- Chee

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi Mark, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:03:24 +GMT (16/02/2001, 17:03 +0800GMT), Mark Aston wrote: MA> This will convert from Outlook Express *.wab format not Outlook, first MA> import to OE from OL to use the convertor. Additionally the pst-wab MA> conversion will not take place in OE if OL i

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hi Jannik, Friday, February 16, 2001, 6:46:07 AM, you wrote: PC>> Ok, there has to be a way for a new Bat user like me to import all my PC>> outlook contacts into TB all at one time. > Go to the Ritlabs beta-page and download the tool called "Wab2Ldif". It converts > the standard windows A

Autoresponder template: how do I make one?

Hey Bat!niks, I tried. I really have tried. But I have no idea how to tame templates to my needs (and it looked so simple!). People send me messages, via an online form, often requesting information from a drop-down list of *lots* of items. All I wanted to do was make a template which would loo

Re: Importing Outlook Contacts

Hello Peter, On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 22:10:35 -0800 Peter wrote on "Importing Outlook Contacts": PC> Ok, there has to be a way for a new Bat user like me to import all my PC> outlook contacts into TB all at one time. Go to the Ritlabs beta-page and download the tool called "Wab2Ldi

Re: POP before SMTP

Hi Dierk, On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:05:22 +0100GMT (16/02/2001, 16:05 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: >> We have a found a buglet: When "POP before SMTP" is tickmarked, TB >> will always do "Combined Delivery", regardless of whether "Combined >> Delivery" is tickmarked or not. DH> Sounds more like

Syncing with Palm Addresses ... was Importing Outlook Contacts

Hello Nick, Thursday, February 15, 2001, 11:49:53 PM, you wrote: Nick> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Nick> Hash: SHA1 Nick> On February 15, 2001, at 10:54:59 PM, Peter Chiou Wrote: PC>> Thanks! That's exactly what I did and it worked. Nick> I did the same thing, although I found it wasn'

Re: POP before SMTP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 3:23:55 AM you wrote: > We have a found a buglet: When "POP before SMTP" is tickmarked, TB > will always do "Combined Delivery", regardless of whether "Combined > Delivery" is tickmarked or not. Sounds

Re: PGP 7.0.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Alexander! On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 5:27:58 AM you wrote: > Mon ami, I'm using 6.5.8 so what ? It doesn't change my opinion ! Didn't intend to. > And You don't know of course, about multiply unsuitable things and bugs in > realizatio