Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote: >> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server >> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a >> *plus* >> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think t

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote: >> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server >> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a >> *plus* >> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think t

Re: Antispamsniper

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server > suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a > *plus* > to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or > eliminated entirely but

Re: Antispamsniper

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server > suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a > *plus* > to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or > eliminated entirely but

Re: Antispamsniper

ings up a point I hadn't considered and is probably valid. As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a *plus* to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello there! This discussion ... about Antispamsniper ... shortened to ASS and A-SS: Keep in mind that ASS and especially A-SS probably has a Spam Score. A-SS likely has a HIGHER (!) Spam Score than ASS simply because it is considered to represent the A-word by an obfuscated version. I suggest

Re: Antispamsniper

> Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks > are > spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good > messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From then > on > A-SS shouldn't ever mark those as junk again

Re: Antispamsniper

> > Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not > mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting, > like order confirmations by Amazon. > > My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I > got mails there I dele

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Thursday, December 8, 2016 you wrote: G> Hi, G> Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not G> mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting, G> like order confirmations by Amazon. G> My TB has separate folders f

Antispamsniper

Hi, Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting, like order confirmations by Amazon. My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I got mails there I delete them after reading. When I've

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Sunday 4 December 2016 at 10:00:13 AM, in , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- > Another way. Where is your executable? Is it in > "Program Files" or > "Program Files(x86)"? If it is the first one, it > is 64-bit. If the > second one, it is 32-bit.

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:59:03 -0600 GMT (03-Dec-16, 22:59 +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > Hello MFPA, > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote: M>> Hi M>> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in M>> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- >>>

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Adrian, On Sunday, December 4, 2016 you wrote: AG> Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote: M>>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>>> M>>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe" >> Just for the record also, none of the examples

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, M>> I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:- > M>> M>>In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" M>> M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>> M>>My TB! executable is called

Re: Antispamsniper

Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote: M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>> M>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe" > Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me > running > the 32 bit version. One

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello MFPA, On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote: M> Hi M> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in M> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- >> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know >>> whether

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- > Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know >> whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit >> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Wednesday 16 November 2016 at 7:48:28 PM, in , Richard Newman wrote:- > I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the > pro version. RITlabs sell licences for both Home and Pro versions. You are only allowed to use TB! for a few weeks

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Rick, On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote: >> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to >> use >> Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and >> installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of

Re: Antispamsniper

> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to use > Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and > installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of > the > fetched emails wound up in the JUNK folder. I guess I

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Adrian, On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote: AG> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 >> bit >> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? AG> Look at the Windows

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Lore, On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote: LG> On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote: >> Hello Jack, >> >> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of >> "Antispamsniper": >> JSL>>> I am consider

Re: Antispamsniper

On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote: Hello Jack, On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of "Antispamsniper": JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello TBUDL@thebat., Tuesday, November 29, 2016, 7:48:30 AM, you wrote: JSL> Hello Richard, JSL> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote: RN>> Hello Goos, RN>> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G>>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G>>>

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of "Antispamsniper": JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? RN>&g

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Richard, On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote: RN> Hello Jack, RN> Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote: JSL>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? RN> Look in

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote: JSL> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? Look in "Help" "About"! -- Best regards, Richard

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Richard, On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote: RN> Hello Goos, RN> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G>> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is G>> registered on my

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is G> registered on my name, on the other hand, I do not see the term G> 'Pro' for the commercial

Antispamsniper

Question: I want to update my Antispamsniper for the Bat. At the website of the program there's a free version and a pro version. The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is registered on my name

AntiSpamSniper

Hello TBUDL, I don't have AntiSpamSniper installed on my pc, and was wondering why the toolbar is showing up in my drop down menu list when I right click the mouse within the header of TB. -- Best regards, Tim The Bat! v4.0.34 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3

AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper website (a TCP connection on port 80). This is suspicious and I don't like it. Does anyone know what's going on and what data is being sent to AntiSpamSniper

Re: AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

Hello all, Sunday, September 7, 2008, Code 2 wrote: I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper website (a TCP connection on port 80). This is suspicious and I don't like it. Does anyone know what's

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper website (a TCP connection on port 80). This is suspicious and I don't like it. Does anyone know what's going on and what data is being sent

AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when there is an entry for that person. Not to pick on Rick Grunwald, but three messages from him

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

Hello all, Wednesday, April 2, 2008, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when there is an entry

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

Hello Leonard, Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 8:58:08 AM, you wrote: LSB AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from LSB TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed LSB that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when LSB

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

LSB AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail LSB from TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've LSB noticed that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk LSB folder even when there is an entry for that person. Not to pick LSB on Rick Grunwald

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 8:01:18 AM, you wrote: this is more than 1 year old version of plugin, there were many fixes, improvements and compatibility issues done since this version. This reminds me of my need for an updated version of the paid AntiSpamSniper, which is over a year old

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

Hello Dan, Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 5:13:10 PM, you wrote: DL If someone could tell me where to get the latest update/patch, I'd DL appreciate it. Click on the Options icon (Antispamsniper toolbar) choose about Search for new version (or update - or something like that) Otherwise : http

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 9:29:15 AM, you wrote: DL If someone could tell me where to get the latest update/patch, I'd DL appreciate it. Click on the Options icon (Antispamsniper toolbar) choose about Search for new version (or update - or something like that) Otherwise : http

Antispamsniper

Hello tbbeta, I have Cc'd this to tbudl: AntispamSniper for TheBat! version 2.5.0.2 [*] The trainable algorithm is improved. New filter learns faster and able to separate spam from good messages with better confidence. [-] The plug-in was unable to filter IMAP for some email servers. [+] Added

Re: AntiSpamSniper no longer recognized...

Hello, Citing myself once more: MP See attached capture. Did not attach it after all (cc to tbudl + text was in message) -- Best wishes, Mark __ Message made with The Bat, 3.98.5 started replying on maandag 26 maart 2007 at

AntiSpamSniper no longer recognized...

pro that made me uninstall ZA, clean the registry and reïnstall it. Because this took some time I meanwhile installed sygate free version. Now I already tried: - installing the latest version of AntiSpamSniper - reinstalling the latest TB! msi... The problem doesn't go away... Did anyone

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

there - neat. However, as I wrote in another message here, I've found that I can't check on the server at all, only on the client. Otherwise it's working a treat. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta. POP3 account AntispamSniper plug-in | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello Henk, On Friday, July 28, 2006, you wrote: developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server, Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial. HMD I have installed this program

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:13:39 +0100GMT (31-7-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I live), Nick Dutton wrote: Can AntispamSniper integrate with TB rules? What do you mean? -- Henk __ The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.81.12 Beta Pro

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

At 19:12 [GMT+0200] on Sunday July 30 (actual time - 1:12am on Monday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Did you ever find a way to copy across the whitelists (all the lists, in fact) from SpamPal, as they aren't text files are they, so how are they copied, if at all? I didn't bother,

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

At 22:33 [GMT-0400] on Saturday July 29 (actual time - 10:33am on Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the same favorable input as the K9 converts do? I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello Mic, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:27:53 PM, you wrote: MC I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. MC I prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and MC

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello Mark, On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:18:39 +0200 GMT (30/07/2006, 23:18 +0700 GMT), Mark Partous wrote: MP I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!), That was not a false positive. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Falls Sie Kettenbriefe in der Post finden, denken Sie

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello Mic, On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MC I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. I've just installed AntispamSniper on my Voyager set up and, if it goes well

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the same favorable input as the K9 converts do? MC I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC now onto AntispamSniper. Increasingly useless? I do not understand. At any rate... Is AntispamSniper

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello rich, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 9:24:57 PM, you wrote: rg At any rate... Is AntispamSniper a plug-in or a proxy? plugin. rg I suppose I do not care much which it is BUT if not a proxy I would be rg able to use X-RAY. It's a proxy and I have yet to get TWO proxies to rg work together

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

29 July 2006 - 19:26 Hello Mark, Friday, July 28, 2006, 8:52:56 PM, you wrote: MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more attractive, too. It's hard to explain but it just feels 'tighter' somehow. -- Best regards,

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello The Janitor everyone else, on 29-Jul-2006 at 20:30 you (The Janitor) wrote: MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more attractive, too. Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try another

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

, then Bayes Filter Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months. And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external application. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

29 July 2006 - 21:49 Hello Alexander, Saturday, July 29, 2006, 8:37:04 PM, you wrote: ASK How long have you been using it now? 3/4 weeks. I previously used K9 for about a year - before that, Popfile for about two years. -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello Marek Mikus everyone else, on 29-Jul-2006 at 22:30 you (Marek Mikus) wrote: And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external application. Thanks for the feedback, Marek. Sounds good

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

with BayesIt, then MM Bayes Filter Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 MM months. And AntispamSniper is the winner. MM I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two MM years ago, but I like plugin more than external application. Watching this thread and I have

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter MM Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months. MM And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I MM have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external MM application. I can second the positive feedback

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I live), Marek Mikus wrote: Hello all, developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server, Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

28 July 2006 - 18:01 Hello Henk, Friday, July 28, 2006, you wrote: HMdB Marek Mikus wrote: ...developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin HMdB I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I HMdB am impressed the way it works/behaves. Me too. HMdB

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello The, Friday, July 28, 2006, 7:07:06 PM, you wrote: HMdB I will keep on using it. TJ So will I (as a replacement for K9). May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

On 28/07/2006 at 16:33 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I am impressed the way it works/behaves. I will keep on using it. Agreed - finally, in Windows, something as good as the astonishing SpamSieve on OS X

AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

Hello all, developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server, Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial. Download: http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html Upgrade info: http

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I live), Marek Mikus wrote: developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server, Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

On 10/07/2006 at 18:10 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I live), Marek Mikus wrote: developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server