Hello Achdut18,
My first idea would be to scan the disk for bad sectors.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:24:55 -0500 GMT (13-Jul-19, 05:54 +0700 GMT),
Achdut18 wrote:
> Upon rebooting, the problem did not disappear. However, the access
> violation number is different. The sent mail folder
Upon rebooting, the problem did not disappear. However, the access violation
number is different. The sent mail folder shows that there are messages
there, but the screen is blank when I click on that folder.
Any ideas on how to fix this?
This is a forwarded message
From: Achdut18
Last night I attempted to access the "send" folder of one of my primary e-mail
account.It only holds 3,145 messages. The in-box for this account has
22,481 messages, and another folder within this account has 5,700 messages.
However, I received an error messages as follow
I generally leave TheBat! running on my desktop 24x7.
Sometime over the past weekend (while I was away and
no one was using my computer) it displayed a message
box showing that it caught an access violation. If
interested, you can see the message at
https://www.svalli.com/files/batbug3.png
I only get them on the odd occasion.
That's my experience -- I get a message such as that every once in a while,
but I don't worry too much about it. With Windows, It's Not All Ones and
Zeros anyway... :-)
--
Fred
Using TheBat V.4.2.44.2 for POP3 mail with Windows 7 Service Pack 1
On Tue, 2015-04-07, Fred wrote:
I only get them on the odd occasion.
That's my experience -- I get a message such as that every once in a while,
but I don't worry too much about it. With Windows, It's Not All Ones and
Zeros anyway... :-)
I also get this, very occasionally, and the once or
Hi
On Monday 6 April 2015 at 5:01:37 PM, in
mid:1775847081.20150406120...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:
I get a similar AV about 70% of the time
I only get them on the odd occasion.
--
Best regards
MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
ETHERNET(n): device
Hi, everyone,
Shutting down The Bat, I received an error message that read as follows:
Access violation at address 01105125 in module 'TheBat.exe'. Read of
address 0008.
The Bat did shut down. Why did I get this error message?
I get a similar AV about 70% of the time
--
Rick
Hi, everyone,
Shutting down The Bat, I received an error message that read as follows:
Access violation at address 01105125 in module 'TheBat.exe'. Read of
address 0008.
The Bat did shut down. Why did I get this error message?
--
Avi
Avram Sacks
Skokie, IL
Using The Bat ver
Hello!
I have a repeating error popping up in TB 4.0.24:
Access Violation at address 007E979F in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0004.
Where to should I direct my inquiry?
--
...listen2reason... - Musaic.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hallo St,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:19:29 +0200GMT (12-7-2008, 12:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMN Where to should I direct my inquiry?
Help - Feedback - bugreport
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Function call to load Windows: here_piggy_piggy_piggy_piggy
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat!
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:32:46 +0200 GMT (12/07/2008, 17:32 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
SMN Where to should I direct my inquiry?
RO Help - Feedback - bugreport
Did you this? It opens a website which requires login.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
On a Korean kitchen knife... Warning:
Help - Feedback - bugreport
Thanks - I have created two reports. One is the AV-error,
the other is the problem with lack of Time Out for outgoing
messages in CC.
--
...listen2reason... - Musaic.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
am Samstag, 12. Juli 2008 um 12:19 schrieb ...listen2reason... - Musaic.Net:
I have a repeating error popping up in TB 4.0.24:
Access Violation at address 007E979F in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0004.
Where to should I direct my inquiry?
To the Beta List, because you
Hello Bat-Folk!
Any idea why I might be seeing this on my new PC.
It does not happen much, but only when TB (v2.12) is running, and once
this error happens TB! is the only program that exhibits any issues. The
windows that shows the list of messages is empty. The folder list is OK
and the
Hello Miguel!
Well, it dragged and dropped into a new message.
And it was only new messages I was working with on Jan 3 and 4.
Won't drag into a Reply editor window. One more piece of info, then.
So far, no AV.
Let's see if this will go without an AV. Of course, if it does, TBUDL
will strip
Hello TBUDL,
When trying to do a (Special) (Remind Later) and selecting (Search a
message in other folders in case it is moved) and choosing what
folders to search, upon clicking (Select All) (OK) I'm receiving an
(Access violation at address OOBBAFC8 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TH Hello TBUDL,
TH When trying to do a (Special) (Remind Later) and selecting (Search a
TH message in other folders in case it is moved) and choosing what
TH folders to search, upon clicking (Select All) (OK) I'm receiving an
TH (Access violation
Hi
I seem to keep getting this Access Violation when starting TB!
Access Violation at address 00404C92 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
address
It doesn't seem to impair the operation of TB, clicking 'OK' allows the
program to continue to run. It's just annoying.
Any ideas?
--
Best
Hello Barry everyone else,
on 20-Jul-2006 at 12:37 you (Barry) wrote:
Any ideas?
You could try to disable all plugins and see if it still happens.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
NP: Star Above Parvati (Bijli Mahadev mix) by Doof
(from the 1996 album Let's Turn
Hello Simon,
Select the container (highlight). Highlight the item you require
in the container, then hold SHFT and click the right arrow button in the
interface.
I tried that (see the item test and its child entry delete in the
screenshot) and got an access violation when pressing the ok
Hello Anthony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:27:02 +0200 GMT (23/10/2004, 13:27 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right?
Pal, with statements that ridiculous
AGA I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along
AGA the lines of
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski
On 24.October.2004, 1:50 AM (Now: 24.October.2004, 8:54 PM),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It didn't work for the shuttle.
AGA It did work for the shuttle; but someone decided to skip a few steps.
lol
--
The Final Cut
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thebat: 3.0.2.1
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT
conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there,
so I'll just stop here... :-)
I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along
the lines of have you
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else
23-Okt-2004 08:27, you wrote:
That's why pilots have checklists
The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats
going on... :)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using v3.0.2.1 on Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 19:35:34 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote
to Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else,
therefore including Me as well:
Hello Anthony
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats
going on... :)
The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they are
doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what they are
doing. Not going through the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 23:03:43 +0200, when Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
It works for NASA; it will work for everyone else.
It didn't work for the shuttle.
- --
Mica
PGP key
On Saturday, October 23, 2004 at 4:03:43 PM [GMT -0500], Anthony G.
Atkielski wrote:
The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they
are doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what
they are doing.
Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a
Mica Mijatovic writes:
It didn't work for the shuttle.
It did work for the shuttle; but someone decided to skip a few steps.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Allie Martin writes:
Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a novice to
give detailed and technical information with explanations that imply
knowledge that exceeds that of the novice. :) In such a situation, one
can easily raise the tech support level.
Typically no one
-Original Message-
From: Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 21, 2004 8:39 AM
To: Michael L. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say
Michael Wilson writes:
I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what
happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third
party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive
comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old
Hello Michael Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 18:38, you wrote:
Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have
virtually stopped.
Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has
*never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has
*never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My system
partition (without additional programs - I have the program files on a
different partition) for XP is 4GB; after installation
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else
22-Okt-2004 19:43, you wrote:
You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right?
Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT
conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there,
so I'll just stop here...
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say this because I worked for 16 years in Redmond
Washington, for Microsoft
Since we remember (from the days of *that* signature of yours *g*) that you
are a teacher, critic and ecclesiastic (sp?)
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 7:03:18 PM, you wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try
AGA to edit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 21 Oct 2004,
@ @ at 17:39:19 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else
21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote:
I know this and say this because I
When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try
to edit the filters, until I stop and restart TB. Nothing is corrupted
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski
On 20.October.2004, 3:14 PM (Now: 20.October.2004, 3:50 PM),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had this bug with the same version that you have right now
I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB!
Uh, I only upgraded to this version six days ago. Do I have to upgrade
this product once a day, or what?
I've also noticed that this problem may be
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] everyone else
20-Okt-2004 21:51, you wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I
Hello Alexander S. Kunz
On 20.October.2004, 4:19 PM (Now: 20.October.2004, 4:21 PM),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASK Ahem... Anthony is using 3.0.1.33 which *is* the latest stable release
ASK version, the only more recent version is 3.0.2.1 (which is a beta), and the
ASK stability of that release
Hello Anthony,
old message...
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try
AGA to edit the filters, until I
Michael Wilson [MLW], wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try
AGA to edit the filters, until I
Hallo Anthony,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:14:48 +0200GMT (20-10-2004, 21:14 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I
AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation,
AGA like the message attached.
What
On Wed 20-Oct-04 2:51pm -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this bug with the same version that you have right now
I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB!
He has the latest version of TB!
I certainly wouldn't recommend that buggy beta to
anyone not on the beta list - I've
Roelof Otten writes:
What happens when you try to move the filter with the up and down
arrows in the toolbar?
I haven't tried it. Next time I'll try that and see what happens. I
don't create new rules very often.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat!
Michael L. Wilson writes:
I would like to speak a little about operating system stability and
the Bat!. The Bat is written in a very high level language that does
not touch deep operating system problems. Since the Bat! only works
on Windows machines, people really need to look to their OS
Correction: The Bat v3 crashin g out on primary monitor as well (in
dualk monitor system) with the following:
Access violation ntdll.dll
Anyone any ideas why that might be? and what ntdll.dll is?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.0
on Windows XP
Hello tbudl,
This has happened several times now, using what reports to be v.3.0:
When working in Sorting Office, I use ALT + Left Click to drag a
(usually newly created?) folder in the left pane to a new position.
The sorting office entries then speed by uncontrollably until an
access
Hello Quin,
Notice I said in my first line that my copy of The Bat! *reports* to
be 3.0. This is because I've repeatedly copied 3.0.0.11 over my
version 3.0. At first, TB! reports v.3.0.0.11 in About but it reverts
to 3.0 when I close and restart The Bat!.
Are you aware that v.3.0.0.11 is
Hi
Trying to PGP sign or encrypt has started giving me
Access Violation at address 00404044 in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address F28B12E7.
This was happening very occasionally but is now all the
time.
After starting TB I can decrypt/verify messages. If I try to
sign or encrypt
Hi
Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 10:34:40 PM, Mike email (The Bat!) wrote:
MeTB Hi
MeTB Trying to PGP sign or encrypt has started giving me
MeTB Access Violation at address 00404044 in module 'thebat.exe'.
MeTB Read of address F28B12E7.
MeTB This was happening very occasionally but is now
Sometimes, when starting up TB, I an error message displays indicating
that an access violation occurred. A couple of times, instead of the
access violation error, I get a Privileged Instruction message.
I seem to be able to close these error messages and continue using
TB! However, I'm wondering
Since a crash of TB this morning after a long time waiting of a mail (probably
the responsible of my problems), I have this error message when I want to mark a Mail
as Junk :
Access violation at address 10023CD6 in module 'bayesit.tbp'. Write of address 0008
I have tried to uninstall bayesit
Hello TB User Discussion List,
I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
message:
Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
After that message, the hour glass was permanently
Hello Bill,
BM Hello TB User Discussion List,
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
BM After that message
Hello Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:42:25 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 13:42 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
I didn't get an AV, only an error dialog saying that ieexplore.exe
couldn't be found.
BM After that message, the hour
On Sun 13-Jun-04 1:56am -0500, Tony wrote:
The MapQuest url opens fine here...
Could it be that the browser the remote location chokes on the URL?
Thanks for checking, Tony. Both locations are using I.E. 6. The odd
thing is that the failure is occurring on my laptop machine - the one
from
On Sun 13-Jun-04 2:00am -0500, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I use mapquest a lot, so I just manually went from Bowie St in San
Antonio to Presidential Blvd in Austin on the website. I cp'ed the
resulting URL into a message in TB, which I sent to myself. I confirm
the same error occurs.
I
Hello Bill,
BM On Sun 13-Jun-04 1:56am -0500, Tony wrote:
The MapQuest url opens fine here...
Could it be that the browser the remote location chokes on the URL?
BM Thanks for checking, Tony. Both locations are using I.E. 6. The odd
BM thing is that the failure is occurring on my laptop
Hi Tony,
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 12:54:48 AM PST, you wrote:
I assume TB! uses MSIE' engine to render the pages; so maybe that
conficts..?
Eek! Please don't assume such a horrible thing! :-) One of TB!'s many
strengths is that it uses its own HTML rendering engine. This is why
it's not
Hello Melissa,
MR Hi Tony,
MR On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 12:54:48 AM PST, you wrote:
I assume TB! uses MSIE' engine to render the pages; so maybe that
conficts..?
MR Eek! Please don't assume such a horrible thing! :-) One of TB!'s many
MR strengths is that it uses its own HTML rendering
Hallo Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:42:25 -0500GMT (13-6-2004, 8:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78
Hallo Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:02:28 +0200GMT (13-6-2004, 11:02 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
T Damn! Exposed as a newbie again... :)
Don't worry, that'll pass over the years.
T It makes me wonder why TB! doesn't fully render HTML then.
T I mean the HTML with little red crosses where
Hello Roelof,
.
T It makes me wonder why TB! doesn't fully render HTML then.
T I mean the HTML with little red crosses where pictures should be.
RO Generally that's because the pictures aren't sent with the message. TB
RO only shows attached pictures.
T I remember something written about
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:10:24 +0200 GMT (13/06/2004, 17:10 +0700 GMT),
Tony wrote:
T Many people are on always-on connections nowadays
What makes you say that? I know *nobody* who is always on at home over
here, and only *some companies* who can afford to.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Thomas,
TF Hello Tony,
TF On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:10:24 +0200 GMT (13/06/2004, 17:10 +0700 GMT),
TF Tony wrote:
T Many people are on always-on connections nowadays
TF What makes you say that? I know *nobody* who is always on at home over
TF here, and only *some companies* who can afford
Tony, [T] wrote:
Maybe we are talking about different things? Almost all people I
know are on ADSL/SDSL/Cable. Much cheaper then dail-up. ADSL is a
booming market here.
:) All the people I know around me speak English.
I was in Japan a couple years ago and met people from many countries.
Hello Tony,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:01:33 +0200 GMT (13/06/2004, 18:01 +0700 GMT),
Tony wrote:
T Many people are on always-on connections nowadays
TF What makes you say that? I know *nobody* who is always on at home over
TF here, and only *some companies* who can afford to.
T Maybe we are
Tony, [T] wrote:
Now you are mainly talking about spam I think? I tackle spam by
other means.
The let them come approach? How about approaching it from a broader
POV. If the spammers have less addresses to spam, then they'll likely
use less Internet bandwidth sending spam. The bandwidth being
Hello Allie,
AM Tony, [T] wrote:
Maybe we are talking about different things? Almost all people I
know are on ADSL/SDSL/Cable. Much cheaper then dail-up. ADSL is a
booming market here.
AM :) All the people I know around me speak English.
AM I was in Japan a couple years ago and met people
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
T Much cheaper then dail-up.
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys:
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:58:52 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
AM Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
AM connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
No, not cheap
Hello Thomas,
.
TF We are talking about different countries.
I'm from the Netherlands. Quite average if I speak to my Scandinavian
friends with their 10 and even 100 mbit home connections.
T Almost all people I know are on ADSL/SDSL/Cable.
TF I knew you were talking about broadband. So was I.
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 12:54:28 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Hmmm. This shouldn't be the case. It should open and I confirm your
problem. Seems like a bug. Can anyone else confirm this. I'll bring it
up on TBBETA
I cannot confirm this. Double-clicking on the HTML file results in the
opening
Hello Allie,
AM Tony, [T] wrote:
Now you are mainly talking about spam I think? I tackle spam by
other means.
AM The let them come approach?
Not really.
When I expressed my wish for HTML rendering it surely wasn't for
opening spam.
K9 scans my e-mail for spam even before it enters my e-mail
Tony, [T] wrote:
Can I explicitly tell TB! to use a certain browser to render a page?
No. TB! will use the default browser for the system.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.11.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp6mqDgVOqad.pgp
Julian Beach (Lists), [JB] wrote:
Hmmm. This shouldn't be the case. It should open and I confirm your
problem. Seems like a bug. Can anyone else confirm this. I'll bring it
up on TBBETA
I cannot confirm this. Double-clicking on the HTML file results in the
opening warning. If I choose YES
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:59:34 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Ok. Your not confirming hastened my efforts to check further. I
changed my default browser from Netcaptor to Opera and it works now.
Is the problem with Message.html attachments that you open directly
from TB (without saving first) or
Hello Julian,
JBL On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:59:34 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
Ok. Your not confirming hastened my efforts to check further. I
changed my default browser from Netcaptor to Opera and it works now.
JBL Is the problem with Message.html attachments that you open directly
JBL from TB
Bill-
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 11:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BM Here's one of the offending URLs:
Works fine here with Mozilla, but I have to say that is quite possibly
the longest url I have ever seen. Could you have run into an IE buffer
overrun?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on
On Sun 13-Jun-04 2:54am -0500, Tony wrote:
So you browsed the site on your laptop.
Saved the url. And then get a crash when you open the same url on the
same laptop?
Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent
Hello Bill,
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:42:25 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM I sent myself a URL to print at a remote location. Clicking on the
BM URL with Outlook worked fine. Clicking with TB! produced this
BM message:
BM Access violation at address 39636A78. Read of address 39636A78.
BM After
Hello Bill,
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 10:59:00 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
BM click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent Mail folder.
I copied your URL to a new message and sent to myself. I then clicked
on the
On Sun 13-Jun-04 5:30am -0500, Mark Wieder wrote:
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 11:42:25 PM, you wrote:
BM Here's one of the offending URLs:
Works fine here with Mozilla, but I have to say that is quite possibly
the longest url I have ever seen. Could you have run into an IE buffer
overrun?
I
On Sun 13-Jun-04 11:06am -0500, Greg Strong wrote:
Sunday, June 13, 2004, 10:59:00 AM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs when I
BM click on that URL while viewing the email from the Sent Mail folder.
I copied your URL to a new message and
Hello Bill,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:59:00 -0500 GMT (13/06/2004, 22:59 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
So you browsed the site on your laptop. Saved the url. And then get
a crash when you open the same url on the same laptop?
BM Yes, the URL was saved to an email and sent out. The AV occurs
On Sun 13-Jun-04 11:20am -0500, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I think it's something in the mapquest URL, as I don't have the
ever encountered the problem with other URLs.
Thomas, I'm sorry to hear you have the same problem but glad I'm not
the only one g. When I write the bug report, I'll include
On Sun 13 June 2004, 21:58:52 +1000, Allie Martin wrote:
ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
Hmm, here in metropolitan Australia we are more fortunate than I
Hello TBUDL,
I have just installed The Bat in a client server config using
ver 2.10.03. The server is W2k, all the client PCs (W2K, XP pro and
XP Home) keep coming up with the following message 'Access violation at address
006261AE in module 'TheBat.exe'. Read of address 0380' all PCs have
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA When I try to change the colour of the Even Quotation under
NA Options/Preferences/ViewerEditor/Plain Text/MicroEd I receive an
NA AV Error each and every time.
Hmmm. Not confirmed here.
--
-=allie_M=- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
I'm using SecureBat Lite v2.02.8 CE and am getting an Access Violation
when trying to change the colour of 2nd level quoted text.
When I try to change the colour of the Even Quotation under
Options/Preferences/ViewerEditor/Plain Text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, December 21, 2003, 7:59:44 AM, I wrote:
I'm using SecureBat Lite v2.02.8 CE
Hmmm? Sorry for the multiple postings... SecureBat's Connection Centre
seems to have stuck resulting in the multiple postings. I don't know what
happened but the
Hello tbudl,
I received an S/MIME message digitally signed with an X.509
certificate. The icon shows that the signature is valid.
However, when I try to open the message I get an access violation.
Is this a known bug in TB 2.0.3? Is there a workaround
Hello Lourdes,
LJ I would backup, uninstall, delete the registry keys and then reinstall
LJ (do not restore yet), test to see if things are working (no AV
LJ entering properties), then restore and test again.
I did it in that sequence, and the first time in run after the installtion I
got
Hello Wilfried,
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 1:14:36 PM, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
WM Could it be the amount of mail I have ? My The bat folder is 200
WM MB. Maybe not ever tested with great amount of mail ?
I have over 200,000 pieces of mail taking up 1.22 GB of space. The
amount of mail you
Hello Wilfried,
Friday, September 12, 2003, 7:07:16 AM, Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
WM Hello,
WM Some question just came up. After the fresh install TB it was not
WM an unregistered version. does this means that the registry was NOT
WM cleaned with the uninstall ?? (so another bug ?)
Not a bug.
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
