Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Goos,

On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote:


>> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server
>> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a 
>> *plus*
>> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or
>> eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to AntiSpamSniper and 
>> really
>> don't know what I'm talking about.


G> Yes, indeed, I have the Pro version.
G> But because I did not find an option to disable leaving mails at the
G> server, I (temporary?) removed the Antispamsniper plugin.

G> @all...
G> Does anyone know if possible where to disable in antispamsniper
G> the 'leave mail at the server' option?

Whoops, I shipped that last one off too soon. After clicking CONFIGURE, click on
the FILTERING tab at the top. There you'll see the pro options which can be
clicked on for explanations.

--
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Goos,

On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote:


>> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server
>> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a 
>> *plus*
>> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or
>> eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to AntiSpamSniper and 
>> really
>> don't know what I'm talking about.


G> Yes, indeed, I have the Pro version.
G> But because I did not find an option to disable leaving mails at the
G> server, I (temporary?) removed the Antispamsniper plugin.

Check out this screen from OPTIONS - PREFERENCES. Highlight AntiSpamSniper and
click CONFIGURE. The pro options are listed there and may give you some clues.

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Rick]

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server
> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a 
> *plus*
> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or
> eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to AntiSpamSniper and really
> don't know what I'm talking about.

@all...
Does anyone know if possible where to disable in antispamsniper
the 'leave mail at the server' option?

There is no such setting per se, but under the ACCOUNTS tab in the settings, 
there are a couple of things to check out. I have NO servers in there and am 
not having the problem, but you can add them and then configure all sorts of 
things.

You might check with the Antispam sniper support

-- 
Rick
7.3.12.28 (BETA)
Windows, 10, 0, 14393



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Goos]

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server
> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a 
> *plus*
> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or
> eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to AntiSpamSniper and really
> don't know what I'm talking about.


Yes, indeed, I have the Pro version.
But because I did not find an option to disable leaving mails at the
server, I (temporary?) removed the Antispamsniper plugin.

@all...
Does anyone know if possible where to disable in antispamsniper
the 'leave mail at the server' option?

Regards,
Gunivortus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Goos,

On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote:


>> Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks 
>> are
>> spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good
>> messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From 
>> then on
>> A-SS shouldn't ever mark those as junk again (I think).

G> If that would the only problem, but many messages aren't even
G> downloaded from the mailserver, they stay there because ASS sees them
G> as Spam.
G> I just removed ASS from my TB and then I got all the mail waiting at
G> the server - among them was even your answer here to me!

G> This is something I really don't want that ASS doesn't download
G> new Mail because its classifies it as Spam.

Before I reply please see Steinar's reply to your email. He/she brings up a
point I hadn't considered and is probably valid.

As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server
suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a *plus*
to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or
eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to AntiSpamSniper and really
don't know what I'm talking about.

Good luck.

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Steinar Pedersen]

Hello there!

This discussion ... about Antispamsniper ... shortened to ASS and A-SS:

Keep in mind that ASS and especially A-SS probably has a Spam Score. A-SS
likely has a HIGHER (!) Spam Score than ASS simply because it is considered
to represent the A-word by an obfuscated version.

I suggest using Antispamsniper - in full - or A. We all understand, A? :)

-- 
Cheers!
Steinar Pedersen <mailto:listen2rea...@musaic.net>



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Goos]

> Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks 
> are
> spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good
> messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From then 
> on
> A-SS shouldn't ever mark those as junk again (I think).

If that would the only problem, but many messages aren't even
downloaded from the mailserver, they stay there because ASS sees them
as Spam.
I just removed ASS from my TB and then I got all the mail waiting at
the server - among them was even your answer here to me!

This is something I really don't want that ASS doesn't download
new Mail because its classifies it as Spam.

Regards,
Gunivortus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Rick]

>
> Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not
> mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting,
> like order confirmations by Amazon.
>
> My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I
> got mails there I delete them after reading. When I've done that for
> awhile, Antispamsniper marks those mails as spam according to its
> logfile.
>
> This is really problematic.I do not have time to check each day that
> logfile and undelete mails.
>
> So, I could use some advise how to solve this problem.

You can go in and edit the white list and the black list. It is a good idea to 
go through them once in a while and remove anything that isn't right. See if 
the Amazon mails were accidently black listed for instance and then add amazon 
the white list (using wild cards and you feel appropriate
If it gets real bad, just reset the training data base and start over 
-- 
Rick
7.3.12.28 (BETA)
Windows, 10, 0, 14393



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Goos,

On Thursday, December 8, 2016 you wrote:


G> Hi,

G> Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not
G> mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting,
G> like order confirmations by Amazon.

G> My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I
G> got mails there I delete them after reading. When I've done that for
G> awhile, Antispamsniper marks those mails as spam according to its
G> logfile.

G> This is really problematic.I do not have time to check each day that
G> logfile and undelete mails.

G> So, I could use some advise how to solve this problem.

Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks are
spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good
messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From then on
A-SS shouldn't ever mark those as junk again (I think).

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Antispamsniper

[Goos]

Hi,

Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not
mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting,
like order confirmations by Amazon.

My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I
got mails there I delete them after reading. When I've done that for
awhile, Antispamsniper marks those mails as spam according to its
logfile.

This is really problematic.I do not have time to check each day that
logfile and undelete mails.

So, I could use some advise how to solve this problem.

Kind regards,
Guus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[MFPA]

Hi


On Sunday 4 December 2016 at 10:00:13 AM, in
, Adrian Godfrey wrote:-


> Another  way.  Where  is  your executable? Is it in
> "Program Files" or
> "Program  Files(x86)"?  If  it  is the first one, it
> is 64-bit. If the
> second one, it is 32-bit.

Assuming you installed it in the default location.

-- 
Best regards

MFPA  

CAUTION! - Beware of Warnings!

Using The Bat! v7.3.12.18 (ALPHA) on Windows 10.0 Build 14393  



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello Jack,

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:59:03 -0600 GMT (03-Dec-16, 22:59 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:

> Hello MFPA,

> On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote:

M>> Hi


M>> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in
M>> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:-


>>> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote:

 I am considering installing A-SS but don't know
 whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit
 TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to
 find out?

>>> Look  at the Windows shortcut. Start, All Programs,
>>> Ritlabs (The Bat).
>>> Mine  shows  "The  Bat  (32 bit)".  I presume the
>>> 64-bit version would
>>> show the same analogously.

M>> I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:-

M>>  
M>>In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" 
M>>   
M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
M>>   
M>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"

> Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me 
> running
> the 32 bit version. One could assume then that RIT Labs labels only the 64 bit
> versions that way thereby identifying *both* versions automatically.

In Help / About, mine clearly shows "(32 bit)".

The shortcut on the desktop is called "thebat32".

The file name is "thebat32.exe".

Just saying.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 7.3.12.7 (BETA)
under Windows 10.0 Build 14393 



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Adrian,

On Sunday, December 4, 2016 you wrote:

AG> Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote:

M>>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
M>>>   
M>>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"

>> Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me 
>> running
>> the 32 bit version. One could assume then that RIT Labs labels only the 64 
>> bit
>> versions that way thereby identifying *both* versions automatically.

AG> Although   I   could   run  the  64-bit  version  (I  have  Windows  7
AG> Ultimate), I actually have the 32-bit version  installed.  My  Windows  
start  menu shortcut shows "The Bat!
AG> (32-bit)"

AG> Another  way.  Where  is  your executable? Is it in "Program Files" or
AG> "Program  Files(x86)"?  If  it  is the first one, it is 64-bit. If the
AG> second one, it is 32-bit.

Good point. Although I have already determined (thru Belarc) that I am running
the 32 bit version, your way is simpler and yes, my executable is contained in
"Program Files(x86)".

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[MAU]

Hello Jack,

M>> I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:-
>
M>>  
M>>In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" 
M>>   
M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
M>>   
M>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"
>
> Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me 
> running
> the 32 bit version. One could assume then that RIT Labs labels only the 64 bit
> versions that way thereby identifying *both* versions automatically.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Jack LaRosa
> Central Alabama USA
>
> Using TB! 6.0.12

I  see  you  are  using TB v6.0.12 and, as far as I can recall, 64 bit
versions of TB started with v6.3. Actually, oldest official .msi files
available  for  download for both 32 and 64 versions are for 6.8.8, as
you can see here:

https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/archive_version.php

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (Els Poblets (Alicante) - Spain)
Using The Bat! v7.2
My photos at: http://mau.smugmug.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com




Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Adrian Godfrey]

Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote:

M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
M>>   
M>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"

> Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me 
> running
> the 32 bit version. One could assume then that RIT Labs labels only the 64 bit
> versions that way thereby identifying *both* versions automatically.

Although   I   could   run  the  64-bit  version  (I  have  Windows  7
Ultimate), I actually have the 32-bit version  installed.  My  Windows  start  
menu shortcut shows "The Bat!
(32-bit)"

Another  way.  Where  is  your executable? Is it in "Program Files" or
"Program  Files(x86)"?  If  it  is the first one, it is 64-bit. If the
second one, it is 32-bit.

Adrian



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello MFPA,

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote:

M> Hi


M> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in
M> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:-


>> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote:

>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know
>>> whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit
>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to
>>> find out?

>> Look  at the Windows shortcut. Start, All Programs,
>> Ritlabs (The Bat).
>> Mine  shows  "The  Bat  (32 bit)".  I presume the
>> 64-bit version would
>> show the same analogously.

M> I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:-

M>  
M>In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" 
M>   
M>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
M>   
M>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"

Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me running
the 32 bit version. One could assume then that RIT Labs labels only the 64 bit
versions that way thereby identifying *both* versions automatically.

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[MFPA]

Hi


On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in
, Adrian Godfrey wrote:-


> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote:

>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know
>> whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit
>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to
>> find out?

> Look  at the Windows shortcut. Start, All Programs,
> Ritlabs (The Bat).
> Mine  shows  "The  Bat  (32 bit)".  I presume the
> 64-bit version would
> show the same analogously.

I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:-

 
   In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" 
  
   My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" 
  
   My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe"



-- 
Best regards

MFPA  

What's another word for synonym?

Using The Bat! v7.3.12.18 (ALPHA) on Windows 10.0 Build 14393  



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[MFPA]

Hi


On Wednesday 16 November 2016 at 7:48:28 PM, in
, Richard Newman wrote:-


> I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the
> pro version.

RITlabs sell licences for both Home and Pro versions. You are only
allowed to use TB! for a few weeks without registering it.


-- 
Best regards

MFPA  

A bird in the hand makes it awfully hard to blow your nose

Using The Bat! v7.3.12.18 (ALPHA) on Windows 10.0 Build 14393  



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Rick,

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote:

>> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to 
>> use
>> Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and
>> installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of 
>> the
>> fetched emails wound up in the JUNK folder. I guess I should be thankful.

R> You will be training that for a bit :)
R> Another  trick  is  to make a filter that deletes emails automatically
R> (and optionally save them out for sending to spam reporting services)

R> I  have  a  bunch  on  my  list as I am sure I will not be getting any
R> wanted emails fro hotbootycall.com :))

What? You don't WANT emails from hotbootycall.com?!?!?! ;)

I don't mind training A-SS because I get just a fraction of the spam emails
that my wife gets. SHE'LL be doing all the training on HER machine.

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Rick]

> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to use
> Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and
> installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of 
> the
> fetched emails wound up in the JUNK folder. I guess I should be thankful.

You will be training that for a bit :)
Another  trick  is  to make a filter that deletes emails automatically
(and optionally save them out for sending to spam reporting services)

I  have  a  bunch  on  my  list as I am sure I will not be getting any
wanted emails fro hotbootycall.com :))
--
Rick


Blessed are the cracked, for they will let in the light.



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Adrian,

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote:

AG> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote:

>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 
>> bit
>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?

AG> Look  at the Windows shortcut. Start, All Programs, Ritlabs (The Bat).
AG> Mine  shows  "The  Bat  (32 bit)".  I presume the 64-bit version would
AG> show the same analogously.

Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to use
Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and
installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of the
fetched emails wound up in the JUNK folder. I guess I should be thankful.

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Lore,

On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote:

LG> On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote:
>> Hello Jack,
>>
>> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of 
>> "Antispamsniper":
>> JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 
>> 32 or 64 bit
>> JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?
>> RN>> Look in "Help" "About"!
>>
>> JSL> I already did. It doesn't state 32 or 64 bit, only the version number.
>> Jack, I assume you use 64 bit Windows version (Windows 10, am I right)?
>> Then I assume you use 64 bit version of TB! (am I right)?
>> If both are correct, than in my opinion you have to use 64 bit version
>> of AntispamSnipper.
>>
>> I was using 32 bit version of TB! on my 64 bit Windows 10, and in that
>> case AntispamSnipper was in 32 bit version. I think, the 'bit' version
>> of AntispamSnipper should be linked with 'bit' version of TB!, not
>> operating system.
>>
>> Hope that helps :)
>>
LG> Hi Jack,

LG> I used Belarc Advisor to see if it would tell me my Bat! version, and it 
LG> does, when you point at the entry for the software - shown here - 
LG> https://i.sli.mg/WXNk3w.jpg

LG> Belarc Advisor shows full info regarding your computer and software, 
LG> good thing to have.  You can get it here free - 
LG> http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html

Thank you lore. I tried that using Speccy (http://www.piriform.com/speccy) but
Speccy doesn't list the installed software. I guess I just forgot I had Belarc
even though it resides on my computer. But once I ran it and looked at the
results it turns out I'm running the 32 bit version of TB!

So, my thanks to all of you who helped in this. I really appreciate it (and so
will my wife).

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Lore Galore]

On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote:

Hello Jack,

On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of 
"Antispamsniper":
JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 
or 64 bit
JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?
RN>> Look in "Help" "About"!

JSL> I already did. It doesn't state 32 or 64 bit, only the version number.
Jack, I assume you use 64 bit Windows version (Windows 10, am I right)?
Then I assume you use 64 bit version of TB! (am I right)?
If both are correct, than in my opinion you have to use 64 bit version
of AntispamSnipper.

I was using 32 bit version of TB! on my 64 bit Windows 10, and in that
case AntispamSnipper was in 32 bit version. I think, the 'bit' version
of AntispamSnipper should be linked with 'bit' version of TB!, not
operating system.

Hope that helps :)


Hi Jack,

I used Belarc Advisor to see if it would tell me my Bat! version, and it 
does, when you point at the entry for the software - shown here - 
https://i.sli.mg/WXNk3w.jpg


Belarc Advisor shows full info regarding your computer and software, 
good thing to have.  You can get it here free - 
http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html


--
Best Regards,
 Lore Galore
 Using The Bat! v7.1.18 on Windows 6.3 Build 9600
 



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Paul Berger]

Hello TBUDL@thebat.,

Tuesday, November 29, 2016, 7:48:30 AM, you wrote:

JSL> Hello Richard,

JSL> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote:

RN>> Hello Goos,

RN>> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote:
G>>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I
G>>> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is
G>>> registered on my name, on the other hand, I do not see the term
G>>> 'Pro' for the commercial version. Any tips?
RN>> I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the pro version. But
RN>> supp...@antispamsniper.com should get you the authoritative answer.

JSL> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 
64 bit
JSL> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?



I use AVAST Internet Security and it stops spam. Think it slows down
my computer so might try Vipre next year.


-- 



Paul

-
 Using The Bat! v7.1.18 on Windows 7
6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1  

...God gave you toes as a device for finding furniture in the dark.



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Arkadiusz Gawlik]

Hello Jack,

On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of 
"Antispamsniper":
JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 
or 64 bit
JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?
RN>> Look in "Help" "About"!

JSL> I already did. It doesn't state 32 or 64 bit, only the version number.
Jack, I assume you use 64 bit Windows version (Windows 10, am I right)?
Then I assume you use 64 bit version of TB! (am I right)?
If both are correct, than in my opinion you have to use 64 bit version
of AntispamSnipper.

I was using 32 bit version of TB! on my 64 bit Windows 10, and in that
case AntispamSnipper was in 32 bit version. I think, the 'bit' version
of AntispamSnipper should be linked with 'bit' version of TB!, not
operating system.

Hope that helps :)

-- 
Best regards,
 Arek



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Richard,

On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote:

RN> Hello Jack,

RN> Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote:
JSL>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 
64 bit
JSL>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?
RN> Look in "Help" "About"!

I already did. It doesn't state 32 or 64 bit, only the version number.

Lemme check RIT labs. It may be shown there.

Thanks.


-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Richard Newman]

Hello Jack,

Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote:
JSL> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 
64 bit
JSL> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?
Look in "Help" "About"!
-- 
Best regards,
 Richardmailto:the...@newmangroup.com
=== 
Using The Bat! v7.3.12.21 (BETA) on Windows 10



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Jack S. LaRosa]

Hello Richard,

On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote:

RN> Hello Goos,

RN> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote:
G>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I
G>> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is
G>> registered on my name, on the other hand, I do not see the term
G>> 'Pro' for the commercial version. Any tips?
RN> I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the pro version. But
RN> supp...@antispamsniper.com should get you the authoritative answer.

I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit
TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out?

-- 
Regards,
Jack LaRosa
Central Alabama USA

Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Windows, 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Antispamsniper

[Richard Newman]

Hello Goos,

Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote:
G> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I
G> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is
G> registered on my name, on the other hand, I do not see the term
G> 'Pro' for the commercial version. Any tips?
I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the pro version. But
supp...@antispamsniper.com should get you the authoritative answer.

-- 
Best regards,
 Richardmailto:the...@newmangroup.com
=== 
Using The Bat! v7.3.12.11 (ALPHA) on Windows 10



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Antispamsniper

[Goos]

Question:

I want to update my Antispamsniper for the Bat.
At the website of the program there's a free version and a
pro version.
The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I
have.
In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is registered
on my name,
on the other hand, I do not see the term 'Pro' for the commercial
version.
Any tips?

Regards,
Gunivortus



Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

AntiSpamSniper

[Tim Hamm]

Hello TBUDL,

  I don't have AntiSpamSniper installed on my pc, and was wondering
  why the toolbar is showing up in my drop down menu list when
  I right click the mouse within the header of TB.

-- 
Best regards,
 Tim

The Bat! v4.0.34
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

[Code 2]

I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now
when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper
website (a TCP connection on port 80).

This is suspicious and I don't like it.  Does anyone know what's going
on and what data is being sent to AntiSpamSniper?

I've blocked the connection attempt for now.  The Bat! seems to
function properly.

-- 
Code 2  :canadaflag:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! version 4.0.28.1 on Windows XP Service Pack 3
Door of a plastic surgeon’s office: Hello. May we pick your nose?



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

[Marek Mikus]

Hello all,
Sunday, September 7, 2008, Code 2 wrote:

 I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now
 when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper
 website (a TCP connection on port 80).

 This is suspicious and I don't like it.  Does anyone know what's going
 on and what data is being sent to AntiSpamSniper?

what about disabling Check for new version automatically option in
Antispamsniper About dialog?

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.0.34
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.0.0.7
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 3.0.0.7 - odd HTTP connection attempt

[Code 2]

 I just updated my AntiSpamSniper plug-in to version 3.0.0.7 and now
 when I start The Bat!, it attempts to connect to the AntiSpamSniper
 website (a TCP connection on port 80).

 This is suspicious and I don't like it.  Does anyone know what's going
 on and what data is being sent to AntiSpamSniper?


MM what about disabling Check for new version automatically option in
MM Antispamsniper About dialog?


That was it.  Thanks Marek.

What an odd place for the automatic update option.  I never would have
thought of checking there for it.

-- 
Code 2  :canadaflag:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! version 4.0.34 on Windows XP Service Pack 3
At a Used Car Lot: Second Hand cars in first crash condition.



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Leonard S. Berkowitz]

AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from
TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed
that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when
there is an entry for that person. Not to pick on Rick Grunwald, but
three messages from him from April 1 ended up in Junk. Before I
marked them as Not Junk, I verified that Rick is in the list of
allowed addressees. Right now, I check the Junk folder regularly and
catch these messages, but it is a chore. Rick is not the only person
whose mail behaves this way. A poster on another list repeatedly ends
up in Junk.

Any wisdom about this problem?

Thanks.

--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v4.0.18 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Marek Mikus]

Hello all,
Wednesday, April 2, 2008, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote:

 AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from
 TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed
 that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when
 there is an entry for that person. Not to pick on Rick Grunwald, but
 three messages from him from April 1 ended up in Junk. Before I
 marked them as Not Junk, I verified that Rick is in the list of
 allowed addressees. Right now, I check the Junk folder regularly and
 catch these messages, but it is a chore. Rick is not the only person
 whose mail behaves this way. A poster on another list repeatedly ends
 up in Junk.

this is more than 1 year old version of plugin, there were many fixes,
improvements and compatibility issues done since this version.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.0.20
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 2.7.1.7
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Stuart Cuddy]

Hello Leonard,
Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 8:58:08 AM, you wrote:

LSB AntiSpamSniper is working over-time. I recently enabled my mail from
LSB TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time. Now, I've noticed
LSB that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk folder even when
LSB there is an entry for that person. Not to pick on Rick Grunwald, but
LSB three messages from him from April 1 ended up in Junk. Before I
LSB marked them as Not Junk, I verified that Rick is in the list of
LSB allowed addressees. Right now, I check the Junk folder regularly and
LSB catch these messages, but it is a chore. Rick is not the only person
LSB whose mail behaves this way. A poster on another list repeatedly ends
LSB up in Junk.

Are you sure it is ASS and not a filter, possibly an old filter that you deleted
a long time ago, or thought you had. This happened to me the other day and when
I investigated it was an old common filter that had not worked for ages, but
with the release of 4.0.20 it seems to have reactivated.

-- 
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v4.0.18.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Code 2]

LSB AntiSpamSniper is working over-time.  I recently enabled my mail
LSB from TBUDL after not receiving mail for a long time.  Now, I've
LSB noticed that mail from posters on the list goes to the Junk
LSB folder even when there is an entry for that person.  Not to pick
LSB on Rick Grunwald, but three messages from him from April 1 ended
LSB up in Junk.  Before I marked them as Not Junk, I verified that
LSB Rick is in the list of allowed addressees.  Right now, I check
LSB the Junk folder regularly and catch these messages, but it is a
LSB chore.  Rick is not the only person whose mail behaves this way.
LSB A poster on another list repeatedly ends up in Junk.


There could also be an AntispamSniper rule that is taking precedent
over your non-spam rule.  For example, an address that you've
inadvertently marked as black will be filtered out as spam even though
you've marked the mail's contents as non-spam.  I'm not sure what
happens if a sender's address appears in both the Friendly Addresses
and Blacklisted Senders lists.  Try checking your AntispamSniper log
to identify the rule that marked the mail as spam.

If all else fails, you might need to clear the AntispamSniper database
and start anew.

-- 
Code 2  :canadaflag:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! version 4.0.18 on Windows XP Service Pack 2
Vienna hotel: In case of fire, do your utmost to alarm the hotel porter.



Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Dan Lester]

Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 8:01:18 AM, you wrote:

 this is more than 1 year old version of plugin, there were many fixes,
 improvements and compatibility issues done since this version.

This reminds me of my need for an updated version of the paid
AntiSpamSniper, which is over a year old and is something like 2.5
and often works overtime and is a bit funky.

If someone could tell me where to get the latest update/patch, I'd
appreciate it.

thanks

dan


-- 
The road goes on forever and the party never ends. REK, Jr. 
Dan Lester, Boise, ID  




Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Mark Partous]

Hello Dan,

Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 5:13:10 PM, you wrote:

DL If someone could tell me where to get the latest update/patch, I'd
DL appreciate it.

Click on the Options icon (Antispamsniper toolbar)
choose about
Search for new version (or update - or something like that)

Otherwise : http://www.antispamsniper.com/

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 4.0.20





Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntiSpamSniper 2.0.0.4 Free issues

[Dan Lester]

Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 9:29:15 AM, you wrote:

DL If someone could tell me where to get the latest update/patch, I'd
DL appreciate it.

 Click on the Options icon (Antispamsniper toolbar)
 choose about
 Search for new version (or update - or something like that)

 Otherwise : http://www.antispamsniper.com/

I'm downloading from that site now.  The latest version.  Assume that
when install it it will install over the other and know that it is
still paid for (just like TheBat does).

If there is a sniper toolbar, I sure don't see it.  I have added the
'mark as junk' and 'mark as not junk' buttons to my toolbar long ago.

Also, related to updates, I've set options in the bat to check on
startup for both regular and beta updates, but it hasn't notified me
of .18, .20, or .20.1.  Is there a problem?

dan


-- 
The road goes on forever and the party never ends. REK, Jr. 
Dan Lester, Boise, ID  




Current version is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Antispamsniper

[Stuart Cuddy]

Hello tbbeta,

  I have Cc'd this to tbudl:

AntispamSniper for TheBat!
version 2.5.0.2
[*] The trainable algorithm is improved. New filter learns faster
and able to separate spam from good messages with better confidence.
[-] The plug-in was unable to filter IMAP for some email servers.
[+] Added Brazilian Portuguese translation.

This  new  release has fixed my IMAP spam filtering and in general has
made  things  work  much  better.  If  you  haven't tried it yet it is
working well for me and worth trying.

Update  is  especially  worth  it  if  you  were having queue freezing
problems with IMAP.


-- 
 Stuart  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.99.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntiSpamSniper no longer recognized...

[Mark Partous]

Hello,

Citing myself once more:

MP See attached capture.

Did not attach it after all (cc to tbudl + text was in message)

-- 
Best wishes,
Mark  


__
Message made with The Bat, 3.98.5
started replying on maandag 26 maart 2007 at 13:42:16



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

AntiSpamSniper no longer recognized...

[Mark Partous]

Hello,

Perhaps not a Beta-issue:

This is what I get when I try to assign the plugin:

Could not initialize the plug-in. It either has some internal problems or it
can not be qualiied as a plug-in

See attached capture.

Yesterday I had problems after installing the 70.337 version of ZoneAlarm pro
that made me uninstall ZA, clean the registry and reïnstall it.

Because this took some time I meanwhile installed sygate free version.

Now I already tried:

- installing the latest version of AntiSpamSniper
- reinstalling the latest TB! msi...

The problem doesn't go away...

Did anyone encounter this problem yet?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.98.5
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 1:4:38) on
Uno AMD Duron
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Richard Wakeford]

Hello Mic,

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MC I didn't bother, and it's working really, really well.

Yes, I've found the same and I did manage to copy across some stuff from
SpamPal, I just double clicked on the respective DLL when asking for
import and it was all suddenly there - neat.

However, as I wrote in another message here, I've found that I can't
check on the server at all, only on the client. Otherwise it's working a
treat.

--
Regards,

Richard

| The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta. POP3 account  AntispamSniper plug-in
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot

Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html   




Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Nick Dutton]

Hello Henk,

On Friday, July 28, 2006, you wrote:
 developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
 version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
 Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

HMD I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I
HMD am impressed the way it works/behaves. I will keep on using it.

I'm a reasonably satisfied user of K9. I miss the integration with TB,
but to date none of the plugins have let me use TB's rules to process
SPAM. Remove from server is my favourite as it allows me to keep my
POP3 server clean for when I connect from low-bandwidth mobile
devices when on the road.

Can AntispamSniper integrate with TB rules?

Regards,

-- 
 Nick



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Henk M. de Bruijn]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:13:39 +0100GMT (31-7-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I
live), Nick Dutton wrote:

 Can AntispamSniper integrate with TB rules?

What do you mean?

-- 
Henk
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.81.12 Beta Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpI1jUYYwjlR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Mic Cullen]

At 19:12 [GMT+0200] on Sunday July 30 (actual time - 1:12am on Monday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:

 Did you ever find a way to copy across the whitelists (all the lists, in
 fact) from SpamPal, as they aren't text files are they, so how are they
 copied, if at all?

I didn't bother, and it's working really, really well.

-- 

cheers, mic

The most I can do for my friend is simply be his friend.
Henry David Thoreau


Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Mic Cullen]

At 22:33 [GMT-0400] on Saturday July 29 (actual time - 10:33am on
Sunday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:

 Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the
 same favorable input as the K9 converts do?

I  moved  from  Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and
now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess.

I  prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and
if something slips through, marking it as junk both teaches the plugin
and  deletes it in one act, rather than having to go back out to K9 to
change it there after deleting it in TheBat. More efficient.

-- 

cheers, mic

Many people dream of success. To me success can only be achieved through 
repeated failure and introspection. In fact, success represents 1 percent of 
your work, which results from the 99 percent that is called failure.
Soichiro Honda (1906-1991) Industrialist


Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Mark Partous]

Hello Mic,

Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:27:53 PM, you wrote:

MC I  moved  from  Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and
MC now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess.

MC I  prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and
MC if something slips through, marking it as junk both teaches the plugin
MC and  deletes it in one act, rather than having to go back out to K9 to
MC change it there after deleting it in TheBat. More efficient.

Well, I installed it (trial commercial version) a couple of days ago.
I still do have K9 for other mail-clients, but AntispamSniper does a rather
good job until now.

I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!),
while I did not have even 1 false positive with K9.

But, as mentioned above, marking as junk (or correcting a false positive) is
easier than in K9.

Moreover, mail handling seems to go quicker than through K9.

So, unless problems should occur during evaluation, I think I will go for
the commercial version.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta





Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello Mark,

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:18:39 +0200 GMT (30/07/2006, 23:18 +0700 GMT),
Mark Partous wrote:

MP I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!),

That was not a false positive. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Falls Sie Kettenbriefe in der Post finden, denken Sie daran: Nur die
Briefe kommen ins Altpapier, die Ketten kommen in die gelbe Tonne.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.81.11 Beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Richard Wakeford]

Hello Mic,

On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MC I  moved  from  Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and
MC now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess.

I've just installed AntispamSniper on my Voyager set up and, if it goes
well, will move from SpamPal and use it on my main TB! set up.

Did you ever find a way to copy across the whitelists (all the lists, in
fact) from SpamPal, as they aren't text files are they, so how are they
copied, if at all?

-- 
Regards,
Richard

| The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta with SpamPal  POP3 account and no Plug-ins
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot

Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html   




Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[rich gregory]

 Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the
 same favorable input as the K9 converts do?
MC I  moved  from  Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and
MC now onto AntispamSniper.


Increasingly useless? I do not understand.
At any rate... Is AntispamSniper a plug-in or a proxy?

I suppose I do not care much which it is BUT if not a proxy I would be
able to use X-RAY. It's a proxy and I have yet to get TWO proxies to
work together.

Thx
RG


-- 
Beautiful Butterfly Displays
http://FramedButterflyArt.com

Random tagline:
A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all.



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Mark Partous]

Hello rich,

Sunday, July 30, 2006, 9:24:57 PM, you wrote:

rg At any rate... Is AntispamSniper a plug-in or a proxy?

plugin.

rg I suppose I do not care much which it is BUT if not a proxy I would be
rg able to use X-RAY. It's a proxy and I have yet to get TWO proxies to
rg work together.

,--/ From Marek Mikus' [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
|  Hello all,
|  developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
|  version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
|  Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.
|  
|  Download:
|  http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html
|  
|  Upgrade info:
|  http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html
`-8---

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta





Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[The Janitor]

29 July 2006 - 19:26

Hello Mark,

Friday, July 28, 2006, 8:52:56 PM, you wrote:

MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)?

I   find   it  more  accurate  and  very easy to configure. The GUI is
more attractive, too.

It's hard to explain but it just feels 'tighter' somehow.

-- 
Best regards,

William

Flying with The Bat! Professional
version 3.80.06



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Alexander S. Kunz]

Hello The Janitor  everyone else,

on 29-Jul-2006 at 20:30 you (The Janitor) wrote:

MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)?

 I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more
 attractive, too.

Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try
another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried
sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the
start).

How long have you been using it now?

FWIW, K9 is running here something like 1 1/2 years now (or maybe even
longer, the statistics are wrong since I started with a new system about
half a year ago, and only imported the old K9 databases) and its results
are always steady.

I have my ISP delete all messages with a SpamAssassin rating higher than
4 the moment they arrive, so K9 only deals with the remaining few spam
mails that SA couldn't catch, and it does a very good job at that. :-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)

Stay young by hanging on to your dreams. There is not much to do but
bury a man when the last of his dreams is dead. -- Wilfred Peterson



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Marek Mikus]

Hello all,
Saturday, July 29, 2006, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)?

 I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more
 attractive, too.

 Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try
 another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried
 sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the
 start).

 How long have you been using it now?

I  have  used  K9  and  other external antispams and then used all antispam
plugins  created  for  The  Bat!,  started  with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter
Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months.

And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I
have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external
application.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 
1.6.2

Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM


 




Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[The Janitor]

29 July 2006 - 21:49

Hello Alexander,

Saturday, July 29, 2006, 8:37:04 PM, you wrote:

ASK How long have you been using it now?

3/4  weeks.  I  previously  used  K9  for  about a year - before that,
Popfile for about two years.

-- 
Best regards,

William

Flying with The Bat! Professional
version 3.80.06



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Alexander S. Kunz]

Hello Marek Mikus  everyone else,

on 29-Jul-2006 at 22:30 you (Marek Mikus) wrote:

 And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I
 have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external
 application.

Thanks for the feedback, Marek. Sounds good.

Maybe you can compare it with K9... since the development of K9 seems
pretty much... dead.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)

People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that
Benjamin Franklin said it first.



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[rich gregory]

 I'm hesitant to try another [plugin] - the two bayes based antispam
 plugins for TB that I tried sooner or later started to crap out (or
 refused to work right from the start).

MM I have used K9 and other external antispams and then used all
MM antispam plugins created for The Bat!, started with BayesIt, then
MM Bayes Filter Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6
MM months. And AntispamSniper is the winner.
MM I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two
MM years ago, but I like plugin more than external application.



Watching this thread and I have seen this AntispamSniper compared to
K9 but not to SpamPal proxy with the Bayesian module.

Still teaching it and though it doesn't seem too bad I do *occasionally*
see TB! lock up at the importing messages part at the end of
downloading new mail. It only happens when there are a couple of hundred
new messages to retrieve and I am tempted to blame SpamPal.

Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the
same favorable input as the K9 converts do?

Thx
RG


-- 
Beautiful Butterfly Displays
http://FramedButterflyArt.com

Random tagline:
Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Larry Wing]

MM Hello all,
MM Saturday, July 29, 2006, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)?

 I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more
 attractive, too.

 Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try
 another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried
 sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the
 start).

 How long have you been using it now?

MM I  have  used  K9  and  other external antispams and then used all antispam
MM plugins  created  for  The  Bat!,  started  with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter
MM Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months.

MM And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I
MM have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external
MM application.


I can second the positive feedback on AntispamSniper. I've been using
it since v1 was announced and bought a license a few weeks later.  Few
spams get by it and even fewer false positives.

I tried the BayesIt and Bayes Filter plugin but had problems with
both.  Prior to switching to The Bat earlier this year I used K9 with
about 98.5% and AntiSpamSniper seems to be running about the same,

My 2 cents worth.

Larry



-- 
TheBat! 3.80.06
Windows XP



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Henk M. de Bruijn]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I
live), Marek Mikus wrote:

 Hello all,
 developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
 version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
 Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

 Download:
 http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html

 Upgrade info:
 http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html

I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I
am impressed the way it works/behaves. I will keep on using it.

-- 
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.81.12 Beta Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpZCADW52kOc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[The Janitor]

28 July 2006 - 18:01

Hello Henk,

Friday, July 28, 2006, you wrote:

HMdB Marek Mikus wrote:

 ...developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin

HMdB I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I
HMdB am impressed the way it works/behaves.

Me too.

HMdB I will keep on using it.

So will I (as a replacement for K9).

-- 
Best regards,

William

Flying with The Bat! Professional
version 3.80.06



Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Mark Partous]

Hello The,

Friday, July 28, 2006, 7:07:06 PM, you wrote:

HMdB I will keep on using it.

TJ So will I (as a replacement for K9).

May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta





Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Alastair Scott]

On 28/07/2006 at 16:33 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I
 am impressed the way it works/behaves. I will keep on using it.

Agreed - finally, in Windows, something as good as the astonishing SpamSieve on 
OS X http://c-command.com/spamsieve/ which I previously thought was 
unbeatable!

In fact, it is so impressive I will be buying the paying version although I 
don't need it (the comments above concern the free version ...).

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)

pgpEdf9MSlQME.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Marek Mikus]

Hello all,
developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

Download:
http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html

Upgrade info:
http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html

-- 

Thanks and Bye,

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.81.06 Beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line







Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Henk M. de Bruijn]

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I
live), Marek Mikus wrote:

 developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
 version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
 Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

 Download:
 http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html

 Upgrade info:
 http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html


Can this be used next to Bayes Filter Plugin or?

-- 
cheers,
Henk M. de Bruijn
__
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.81.06 Beta Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

pgpCoiphDghJ8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

[Alastair Scott]

On 10/07/2006 at 18:10 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I
 live), Marek Mikus wrote:

 developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
 version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
 Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

 Download:
 http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html

 Upgrade info:
 http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html

 Can this be used next to Bayes Filter Plugin or?

There is no technical reason why not. However, the author doesn't recommend it. 
Quote:

It is recommended to remove any other installed anti-spam plug-ins from The 
Bat!. If you have several plug-ins installed, then the overall rating for 
messages is evaluated according to special parameter in The Bat! settings. It 
is Average by default and this means that the rating will be evaluated as 
average between the rating obtained from each plug-in. Maximum and Minimum 
mean that the maximum or minimum rating from all values will be taken as 
overall rating. Plug-ins are not learning from each other and that is why there 
is no sense in installing several plug-ins simultaneously. The classification 
quality will be approximately equal to the quality of the plug-in with the 
worst characteristics. Moreover, the less learned plug-in will be unable to 
learn normally. The more learned plug-in will correctly classify the messages 
unknown to less learned plug-in and therefore it will never learn such 
messages.

I would have to lie down for a few hours in a darkened room to fully digest 
that reasoning, but it seems plausible ;)

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

pgp08Dbv2HReZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html