Hello MFPA,
M Hi
M On Monday 23 March 2009 at 5:06:56 PM, in
M mid:688318481.20090323120...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
BTW, I tried to send this suggestion to The Bat! Wish
address (w...@thebat.net) but it bounced back. Does
anybody know if there's still such a wish list address?
M
Hi
On Monday 23 March 2009 at 5:06:56 PM, in
mid:688318481.20090323120...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
BTW, I tried to send this suggestion to The Bat! Wish
address (w...@thebat.net) but it bounced back. Does
anybody know if there's still such a wish list address?
Go to
Hello Dwight,
DC On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:01:46 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
all addresses to whom the message was sent?
DC that would
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:01:46 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
all addresses to whom the message was sent?
that would certainly be a nuisance
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 23:25, MFPA wrote:
That surprises me, as our data protection act is supposed to have been
enacted top comply with EU requirements that they tell us require such
enactments in every EU country.
We call that QS here and the only thing is: Do net let them catch you,
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:28:43 + GMT (21/Mar/09, 5:28 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M Or to a disposable address used for the purpose...
You cannot use a disposal email address in busines. If
you want to do any.
M I do not see how using a disposable address in the To field of a
M
Hello Jack,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:41:42 -0500 GMT (21/Mar/09, 3:41 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
TF Yes, absolutely. I have been angered many times by people CC'ing me in
TF to a funny mail to a hundred people I don't know.
JSL As have I. Most annoying.
I think everybody has this
Hello Jernej,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:44:01 +0100 GMT (21/Mar/09, 2:44 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
So, maybe, they should have to type in I agree to THIS or simply YES
JS They'll click [X] and then complain that the program doesn't work (and
JS still won't read the message). I've seen it
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 9:01:46 AM, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
all addresses to whom the message was sent?
that would certainly be a nuisance
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 3:20:56 PM, MFPA wrote:
Not just prudent - under certain circumstances, sharing personal data
in this way without the permission of the data subject would be
unlawful, as well as bad manners.
Unlawful??
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
On Thursday, March 19, 2009, 3:20:56 PM, MFPA wrote:
Not just prudent - under certain circumstances, sharing personal data
in this way without the permission of the data subject would be
unlawful, as well as bad manners.
Unlawful??
The Internet Police are monitoring this thread ... :))
Hi
On Saturday 21 March 2009 at 7:00:12 PM, in
mid:1054534911.20090321140...@fastmail.fm, Dwight Corrin wrote:
Unlawful??
Sharing somebody's personal data without their permission could very
easily place you in breach of data protection legislation in many
countries.
--
Best regards,
Hi
On Friday 20 March 2009 at 10:09:07 PM, in
mid:326668246.20090320230...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Yes, as we already recognized while translating it is
the same option or something is wrong in the orginal
English String - not clear.
Evidently it is the same option, presumably because
Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 at 18:25, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Now, this is funny. I guess the wife of the owner of your company
owned a factory for green and yellow sheets of paper.
No, it's been my job to transport raising agent and cheese to Spain
and Portugal and get back paper from Portugal
Hi
On Thursday 19 March 2009 at 8:54:08 PM, in
mid:9010130181.20090319215...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
as an Option to configure like Empty Subject.
How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the
option.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Don't
Hello MFPA,
as an Option to configure like Empty Subject.
How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the
option.
Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.1.11.8
See some of my photos at
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 15:39, MFPA wrote:
mid:9010130181.20090319215...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
as an Option to configure like Empty Subject.
How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the
option.
I am glad, i can help you out: There is a Checkbox in the
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 16:49, MAU wrote:
as an Option to configure like Empty Subject.
How do you configure the Empty Subject pop-up? I have never found the
option.
Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations
Thank you for the Team-Play!
I thought, there must be an equivalent
Hello Jens,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:56:00 +0100 GMT (20/Mar/09, 16:56 +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
Now, this is funny. I guess the wife of the owner of your company
owned a factory for green and yellow sheets of paper.
JF No, it's been my job to transport raising agent and cheese to Spain
JF
Hello Jack,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:39 -0500 GMT (20/Mar/09, 1:40 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL [...] As a consequence, my daughter is now receiving messages
JSL from her cousin with whom she may or may not wish to maintain
JSL correspondence. No biggie, but I wish TB would keep a
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:11:05 + GMT (20/Mar/09, 3:11 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Personally, if person A asks me for the email address
of person B, I never give it out without asking
person B if it's ok to do so. I wish only that TB
made sure I adhered to this rule when sending to
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:20:56 + GMT (20/Mar/09, 3:20 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Actually, I was taught that whenever sending a message to multiple
recipients who may or may not know each other, it is considered
prudent NOT to include everyone in the TO field.
M Not just prudent -
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 17:54, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
You are in the trucking business?
I have been for some years and some X * 10 km (about 15-2 per
month).
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat!
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:00, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
And the CC field. And the warning will be ignored. I guarantee you
that people who put multiple addresses in TO or CC fields don;t even
think for a moment what they do, and they will click the warning away
without even reading it.
So,
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Unfortunately, it is not even considered
bad manners over here, because cultures are different as well. Call me
Don Quijote, these are my windmills.
It is the same in Italy :-)
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
On Friday, March 20, 2009, 20:12:44, Jens Franik wrote:
So, maybe, they should have to type in I agree to THIS or simply YES
They'll click [X] and then complain that the program doesn't work (and
still won't read the message). I've seen it happen too many times.
--
Jernej Simončič
Hi
On Friday 20 March 2009 at 3:49:31 PM, in
mid:293118673.20090320164...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote:
Options/Preferences/Other options/Confirmations
Thanks, MAU. Sorted. It had not occurred to me to try the box about
/saving/ a message with an empty subject because I was looking for one
that
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 22:57, MFPA wrote:
Thanks, MAU. Sorted. It had not occurred to me to try the box about
/saving/ a message with an empty subject because I was looking for one
that said it was about /sending/ a message with empty subject. I
always want a subject in a message I send
Hi
On Friday 20 March 2009 at 7:13:34 PM, in
mid:1086246945.20090320201...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Freitag, 20. März 2009 at 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Unfortunately, it is not even considered bad manners
over here, because cultures are different as well.
Call me Don Quijote, these
Hi
On Friday 20 March 2009 at 5:03:34 PM, in
mid:165292262.20090321000...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
M Or to a disposable address used for the purpose...
You cannot use a disposal email address in busines. If
you want to do any.
I do not see how using a disposable
Hello Thomas,
TF Hello Jack,
TF On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:39 -0500 GMT (20/Mar/09, 1:40 +0700 GMT),
TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL [...] As a consequence, my daughter is now receiving messages
JSL from her cousin with whom she may or may not wish to maintain
JSL correspondence. No biggie, but I
Hallo Jack,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:01:46 -0500GMT (19-3-2009, 15:01 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Does TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender
JSL that he/she is about to send a message where all recipients would
JSL be able to see all addresses to whom the message was
Fellow list members,
Having recently accidentally violated the email etiquette rule about
putting multiple addresses in the TO field, I got to wondering... Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients would be able
Hello Rick,
I'm not sure that IS etiquette. I worked in an IBM facility and it was
common practice to send something TO: two or three primaries and CC:
several others.
I know what you're saying; If someone else needs to read this email I
should use the CC line. I'm not really sure it rates
Hello Rick,
Fellow list members,
Having recently accidentally violated the email etiquette rule about
putting multiple addresses in the TO field, I got to wondering... Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:22:03 +0100 GMT (19/Mar/09, 22:22 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
I'm not sure that IS etiquette. I worked in an IBM facility and it was
common practice to send something TO: two or three primaries and CC:
several others.
I know what you're saying; If someone else
Hello Jack,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:34:36 -0500 GMT (19/Mar/09, 22:34 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL Actually, I was taught that whenever sending a message to multiple
JSL recipients who may or may not know each other, it is considered
JSL prudent NOT to include everyone in the TO field.
Hello Thomas,
TF Hello Jack,
TF On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:34:36 -0500 GMT (19/Mar/09, 22:34 +0700 GMT),
TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
snipped for brevity
JSL As mentioned in the original post, I accidently sent a message to
JSL family and friends and
Hi
On Thursday 19 March 2009 at 6:40:39 PM, in
mid:1954619436.20090319134...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
It's just that in today's world where personal emails
probably surpass business emails in quantity, the
etiquette of concealing other addresses I assume, would
be appreciated by
Hi
On Thursday 19 March 2009 at 3:34:36 PM, in
mid:0507531.20090319103...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Actually, I was taught that whenever sending a message
to multiple recipients who may or may not know each
other, it is considered prudent NOT to include everyone
in the TO field.
Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 at 15:01, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Does
TB have any method (setting) which would warn the sender that he/she
is about to send a message where all recipients would be able to see
all addresses to whom the message was sent? Something like the warning
you get when you
Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 at 15:35, Rick wrote:
I'm not sure that IS etiquette. I worked in an IBM facility and it was
common practice to send something TO: two or three primaries and CC:
several others.
I know it like this:
The Destination which the Mail is dedicated written to in the To:
Hello Thomas,
Now, this is funny. I guess the wife of the owner of your company
owned a factory for green and yellow sheets of paper.
Don't know. I've never known who was or is the owner of NASA-JPL. ;)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.1.11.8
See some
43 matches
Mail list logo
