Hi,
I'm trying to specify a list of valid ciphers for a standalone tomcat
instance. I've scoured the FAQs, documentation, and googled until my
eyes bled.
I did find references to the RFC, and to the best of my knowledge, I am
specifying the ciphers in compliance with those specifications.
I
I'm going to answer my own question.
The cipher attribute is not support in tomcat 4.1.29.
Thanks,
-chris
From: Chris Zappala
Sent: Wed 6/29/2005 1:52 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Specifying multiple, valid ciphers in standalone tomcat
I tried simply going like this
Host name=www.mysite.com
Context path= docBase=/var/www/server1 reloadable=true debug=0
/
/Host
Host name=mail.external.mysite.com
Context path= docBase=/var/www/server2 reloadable=true debug=0
/
/Host
I believe you are only allowed to have one Context
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Virtual hosts with standalone tomcat 5.5.9
I tried simply going like this
Host name=www.mysite.com
Context path= docBase=/var/www/server1 reloadable=true
debug=0 /
/Host
Host name=mail.external.mysite.com
Context path
how do you have mail.external.mysite.com set up in your dns?? Does it
point to the same IP as your tomcat server that mysite.com is hosted on?
Drew.
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:16 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mail.external.mysite.com
PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:16 PM
Subject: Virtual hosts with standalone tomcat 5.5.9
All I need is different FQDNs (Fully qualified domain names)
Say:
www.mysite.com,
mail.external.mysite.com
I tried simply going like this
Host name=www.mysite.com
All I need is different FQDNs (Fully qualified domain names)
Say:
www.mysite.com,
mail.external.mysite.com
I tried simply going like this
Host name=www.mysite.com
Context path= docBase=/var/www/server1 reloadable=true debug=0 /
/Host
Host name=mail.external.mysite.com
Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Charles Huey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:19 PM
To: Tomcat User
Subject: load balance standalone tomcat 4
Is it actually possible to use a load balancing appliance (Big IP) with
a couple
Is it actually possible to use a load balancing appliance (Big IP) with
a couple of web servers running standalone Tomcat 4? Actually, I know
it's possible...what I mean is, do I have to do anything special with
Tomcat, or can I set each Tomcat up as if it was the only server, and
then just put
Hi,
Can I tried the following approach to lookup the EJBs instead of suggested by
the document from
http://www.amitysolutions.com.au/documents/JBossTomcatJNDI-technote.pdf
Here is what I want to do to get the EJBs from tomcat:
1) use an InitialContext object to get the ENC variables that were
I'd like to hear people's opinions on the best way to have Tomcat
accessible via standard ports (80 and 443).
As I understand it, under Linux (and other unixes), ports 1000 must be
run as root. I've also read that there are some difficulties running
Tomcat as root. I gather that the
that is an upper case S
or it will be ignored.
Good luck and watch for typos.
Doug
www.parsonstechnical.com
- Original Message -
From: Barnet Wagman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:45 PM
Subject: (newbie q) Connector vs running standalone
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 03:45:13PM -0500, Barnet Wagman wrote:
: As I understand it, under Linux (and other unixes), ports 1000 must be
: run as root.
Yes and no. The port must be *bound* by root, at which point the
process may switch to another user to perform the real work.
: I gather
The easier way is just leave tomcat listening on 8080 and add a port
redirection rule using netfilter.
- You just have to redirect incoming conections on port 80 to port 8080.
- Add proxyPort=80 on the Connector tag in server.xml.
Voila!
You're done.
Bytes
DAC
Barnet Wagman escribió:
I'd like
Hi all,
Sorry if this is a really dumb question, but how/where do I
set system properties when using Tomcat 4.1.24? I've searched
around but found nothing obvious.
Is it in an xml file rather than a .properties file?
Is it in the Java JDK?
Best regards
Chris
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 3:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Setting system properties in standalone Tomcat 4.1.24
Hi all,
Sorry if this is a really dumb question, but how/where do I
set system properties when using Tomcat 4.1.24? I've searched
around but found nothing
Thanks. That's just what I needed. I thought I'd done it at some
point in the past!
Best regards
Chris
If by system properties you mean JVM (Java Virtual Machine)
settings, then you can do this by setting the CATALINA_OPTS
variable in the catalina.sh (unix, linux) or catalina.bat
I have searched around to find this and have found nothing, but is it possible to load
balance a complete standalone Tomcat server or cluster standalone Tomcat's doing HTTP
and Application requests?
Thank you everyone in advance
Dean
Yes you can cluster and load balance tomcat using mod-jk2 Connector
-Original Message-
From: Dean Searle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
I have searched around to find this and have
Tomcat 4.1
Yes you can cluster and load balance tomcat using mod-jk2 Connector
-Original Message-
From: Dean Searle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
I have searched around to find
balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
I knew you could do that with apache and tomcat, but I'm looking at
only
Tomcat itself and nothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Asif Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 11/11/2003 14:37
To:Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Load
14:44
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject:RE: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Howdy,
Yes, you can do with tomcat standalone. See
http://www.filip.net/tomcat/tomcat-javagroups.html
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Dean Searle [mailto
: RE: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Thank you very much, Yoav.
Reading through it looks like I would need the assistance of Apache
anyways, or can I have an instance of Tomcat listening on port 80 and
do
the load balancing?
Dean
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto
balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Howdy,
You don't have to have Apache in front. Any load-balancer will do. Let
me redirect you to the tomcat 5 clustering page, as it's more recent,
and I think easier to follow:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/cluster-howto.html
Tomcat 5's clustering
On Tue, November 11, 2003 1at 1:52 am, Dean Searle wrote:
Reading through it looks like I would need the assistance of Apache
anyways, or can I have an instance of Tomcat listening on port 80 and do
the load balancing?
As Yoav hinted, you can use any type of load balancer in front of Tomcat.
* that this is a
feature in Tomcat 5 (please please please!!!)?!?!?! :)
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you that solution
. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:38:13 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
I've deployed an app using Tomcat Standalone (www.hotel.us) and while
there
have been several issues that were a little less than obvious, I have
found
a solution to every single one of them and am overall pretty satisfied
with
tomcat. but this one little thing would force me to have to go to
: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Well, a few things come to mind.
1. A comparison was made - using tomcat as a web server is like racing a mac
truck. Well, for someone new to tomcat and apache (I just arrived from
microsoft/iis land) the correct usage pattern was less than obvious ... I
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I would disagree 100%. You're assuming that
priority one for any commercial use of Tomcat
is maximizing search engine placement for a
given URL.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
most will do) its not going to count when the engine realizes it is a
302.
:(
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Me too.
Especially
: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I would disagree 100%. You're assuming that priority one for any commercial
use of Tomcat is maximizing search engine placement for a given URL. I
would be surprised if, out of all the people using Tomcat in a commercial
situation, that was priority one for more than .1
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Its *not* that simple. Pagerank (guaging inbound links from
other sites)
would need to all be coordinated to point to that specifc
file. This would
be very difficult. PR is the most significant factor in SERPs on most
modern engines
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I'm not presuming its priority #1 always, but yes I am
presuming it is a
very high priority ... but ... 80% of web traffic comes from
search engines.
Unless you're one you've got a major print and media
advertising budget how
else do
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 03:54:05 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I'm not presuming its priority #1 always, but yes I am
09, 2003 5:34 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I'd love to see a cite for 80% of web traffic comes from search engines.
I've worked on plenty of high-traffic public websites in my day, and have
never, ever found that to be the case
If the site has real value, the customers will find it all by themselves.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
You're
: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
If the site has real value, the customers will find it all by themselves.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
(a) my ISP will want to get involved and charge me hourly for the
setup of an addt'l app
This is hosted on their server
: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Oh C'mon! How?!?!?! Telepathy? ;-) I know that there are
other means
such as word of mouth and as Craig said there's
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Is that right? The key we generated for Tomcat will also
work on Apache?!?!
This is surpising (though
Neal wrote:
Is that right? The key we generated for Tomcat will also work on
Apache?!?!
This is surpising (though a plesant suprise) because the method by which
we
had to create the key for tomcat was different than what the admin had
apparently done prior with Apache.
Noel wrote:
Neal
Hiya Neal (and others)
As a counterpoint to your argument about search engines and
small sites I have some real numbers:
From my website referrer stats:
(For an Apache HTTP: http://www.eaves.org)
Direct requests : 28%
Google.com : 1.5%
Google images : 0.7%
search.yahoo.com : 0.3%
Google.ca :
unless we care to undertake a dramatic new
survey of Internet and search engine usage patterns. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Jon Eaves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
.
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: [OFF-TOPIC] RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
I can only comment on my own experience. I'm assuming that the application
of
profit, not to mention the cost of supporting that customer that first year.
And if they leave, you end up with nothing.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone
What exaclty is a RewriteRule and how is it used with Standalone Tomcat? Do
I define my RewriteRules somewhere in server.xml or web.xml?
A couple of months ago, Noel told me how I could get Tomcat to show the
content of the default welcome page without redirecting (http 302) to the
file, using
: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
What exaclty is a RewriteRule and how is it used with
Standalone Tomcat? Do
I define my RewriteRules somewhere in server.xml or web.xml?
A couple of months ago, Noel told me how I could get Tomcat
to show the
content of the default welcome page without
a feature of tomcat ... I call it a PAIN IN THE ASS,
and a serious oversight for standalone Tomcat.
Anyone know a solution?
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:16 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE
and Standalone Tomcat
Beat me with a stick if I'm wrong, but RewriteRule is for Apache when using
mod_rewrite, I don't think you can use it in server.xml or web.xml.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Yes, specific to a Tomcat issue, but the solution incorporates Apache. :)
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Oh
Oh, does that mean it *is* possible to use RewriteRules with Tomcat
Standalone then? :-\
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Yes
1:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Yes, specific to a Tomcat issue, but the solution incorporates Apache. :)
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
to Tomcat via WARP?
I'm confused. :(
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Yes, but your requests must be passed through Apache to
Tomcat-Standalone via
to behave
differently.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 5:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
It sounds like you are saying that you must also run Apache ... that Tomcat
alone
: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Many people do not run Tomcat on port 80. Some do. Those who don't, run
Apache on port 80 and use a connector to pass requests to Tomcat.
Tomcat Stand-alone means Tomcat running on port 80, or some other port
with the port number appended to the request
and Standalone Tomcat
John,
You say there is a patch for Tomcat that will fix this redirect thing ... or
at least allow me to configure it to not redirect like this? Great! Do you
know specifically which patch this is? Is there any documentation that you
know of regarding the patches ability to tweak
-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:51 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
See Tim Moore's reply to your post earlier today:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-userm=104206237029628w=2
The discussion
, 2003 6:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
John,
Thanks for the threads. I will certainly read them.
I can't imagine why Tomcat wouldn't support this behavior unless there is
another issue in Tomcat that this is covering up ... I mean this is basic
http
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:33:50 -0500
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
No problem, glad to help. Remember
-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:33:50 -0500
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
Neal,
I told you that solution in the context of your avoiding a redirect (302),
not in the context of standalone Tomcat. mod_rewrite is an Apache module.
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/msg38750.html is
the start of a thread on patching Tomcat to do a forward
OK, so what's the rationalization for the 302? Can you shed some light on
that?
John
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8
: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Hmm. But the fact still remains that Tomcat Standalone will not be a
commercially viable http server on its own if it can't display a welcome
page without redirecting to the page. Dispite all of Tomcat's other
abilities, not having this ability is like
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:19:47 -0500
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
OK, so what's the rationalization
finally
getting around to putting it into action, I realized the problem.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Neal,
I told you
Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:19:47 -0500
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
OK, so what's the rationalization
Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:27 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Sounds like the makings of a good debate, and a classic chicken and egg
problem. Does Tomcat submit to how some search engines
: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
Well, a few things come to mind.
1. A comparison was made - using tomcat as a web server is like racing a mac
truck. Well, for someone new to tomcat and apache (I just arrived from
microsoft/iis land) the correct usage pattern was less than obvious ... I
just
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:11:44 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
So, in this scenario .. if a url without a directory
: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:24 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:11:44 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, neal wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:38:13 -0800
From: neal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
In you previous email you say:
This still screws up
: Restricting SSL Cipher Suites with Standalone Tomcat 4.1.12?
Can I do this? Is it a stupid ?? Can someone point me in the right
direction?
I have Tomcat 4.1.12 running fine with JDK 1.3.1 but I'd like to restrict
the available cipher suites to the stronger sets. I see the notes about
Apache httpd.conf
Can I do this? Is it a stupid ?? Can someone point me in the right
direction?
I have Tomcat 4.1.12 running fine with JDK 1.3.1 but I'd like to restrict
the available cipher suites to the stronger sets. I see the notes about
Apache httpd.conf and SSLCipherSuite but that doesn't work for Tomcat,
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can suppress directory indexes in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf/web.xml
file. See the listings init parameter for the default servlet.
Read my previous post.
You have complete control over which requests your filter
: Marc Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can suppress directory indexes
Marc, in the message title you say you want to suppress directory listings,
but in the content, you speak about preventing access to some directories.
These are two completely different things.
Almost all responses you are receiving are directed to the first issue, that
is, preventing Tomcat from
Hi,
I browse the archive, but I found just a part of the answer.
I use Tomcat standalone (the app will run under tomcat 3.x and 4.x). I want
to prevent access to directories, but I just want to configure this in the
web.xml file of my app, nowhere else !
As u see below, the web.xml is quite
Hi,
Yes, but it means that I change the behaviour of the others app !
- Original Message -
From: Kiev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
If you
Opps, I have tested this in the conf/web.xml file : no effect !
init-param
param-namelistings/param-name
param-valuefalse/param-value
/init-param
Kiev
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
other ways
John
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mendez [mailto:mendez;lug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
Opps, I have tested this in the conf/web.xml file : no effect
- Original Message -
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you search the archives? This topic has come up several times before.
Do some research!
And... do read my posts !
1. I browsed the archive
2. The solutions does not work.
I want to change the web.xml of the app.
I
web.xml.
John
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mendez [mailto:mendez;lug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
- Original Message -
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Marc Mendez wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:13:08 +0100
From: Marc Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
Stick a file
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mendez [mailto:mendez;lug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
Stick a file called index.html in the directory where you
want listings
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Marc Mendez wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you search the archives? This topic has come up several times
before. Do some research!
And... do read my posts !
1. I browsed the archive
2. The solutions does not work.
Mendez [mailto:mendez;lug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Standalone Tomcat : suppress directory listing in web.xml
- Original Message -
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you search the archives? This topic has
Is it OK to shut down IIS entirely on a computer running Windows 2000
Server and run ONLY Tomcat (bound to port 80) in standalone configuration
as a service? The question might seem patently ridiculous to anyone who
runs Unix, but I've gotten the definite impression that there are several
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:07:54PM -0400, Jeff wrote:
Is it OK to shut down IIS entirely on a computer running Windows 2000
Server and run ONLY Tomcat (bound to port 80) in standalone configuration
as a service? The question might seem patently ridiculous to anyone who
runs Unix, but I've
:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Shut down IIS and replace w/standalone Tomcat --
consequences?
Is it OK to shut down IIS entirely on a computer running
Windows 2000
Server and run ONLY Tomcat (bound to port 80) in standalone
configuration
as a service? The question might seem
Jeff,
I don't see any real system issues, but then I'm not a
Windows guru.
I do see some other issues, depending on what your
intentions are. With IIS running, you have the option
of using ASP as well as all the jsp/servlet/xml tools
that Tomcat provides.
Before people jump all over me, one
You don't have to shut down IIS completely. I have IIS and Apache both running on my
W2K domain controller. All I did was go to Internet Services Manager and Stop the
Default Website and the Administration Website. Once you do that, port 80 is free and
you can run tomcat on that port.
Craig
).
Thanks.
Leos
// index: linux ipchains port forward apache 80 tomcat 8080 root privilege
- Original Message -
From: Ralph Einfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: AW: Standalone Tomcat on port 80 without root privileges
Seriously, why not use Apache with a connector...
Because there is many problems.
I tested it. I has standard installation of Tomcat and Webapps from RPM
(full edition). I dont know how to generate jkconf data as described in
HOWTO. There is use parameter jkconf when start tomcat. Where? I
Hello,
How to run tomcat JSPs and servlets on Linux on port 80 without root
privileges?
I want to run Tomcat4 without Apache on my Redhat 7.3 Linux server. Tomcat 4
is installed from rpm and run as tomcat4 user. I changed port setting to
port 80 (http) and 443 (https) in server.xml to listen on
Some ideas:
- Use a proxy that redirects all requests on port 80 to 8080.
- Use nat and map port 80 to 8080 (port forwarding)
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: Leos Urban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2002 09:53
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Standalone Tomcat
Use Windows, especially Millenium :-)
Seriously, why not use Apache with a connector...
Andr
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 August 2002 10:25
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: AW: Standalone Tomcat on port 80 without root privileges
Some
Hi --
I want to run tomcat 4.0x on a Solaris 8 box in standalone mode on port 80
as a user other than root.
Is this possible? I been zipping through the archives and what I am hearing
is that because root can only open ports 100, this scenario wouldn't be
possible. There was a post on jguru
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:42:51PM -0600, D Henton wrote:
I want to run tomcat 4.0x on a Solaris 8 box in standalone mode on port 80
as a user other than root.
Is this possible? I been zipping through the archives and what I am hearing
is that because root can only open ports 100, this
Wolfgang Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as i understand the client-auth handshake,
the server sends a list of trusted CAs to the client.
This list is take from
JAVA_HOME_set_in_your_tomcat\lib\security\cacerts
So you have to import your CA-cert into that file,
instead of your
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
