What quote do you refer too?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The term ANTI is a device for member protection from "TRUTHS that are NOT USEFUL"DAVEH: While that may or may not be the case (you took the quote out of context, and did not connect it to ANTI by the author.so it is not possible
Kevin Deegan wrote:
What quote do you refer too?
DAVEH: "TRUTHS that are NOT USEFUL"
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
term ANTI is a device for member protection from "TRUTHS that are NOT
USEFUL"
DAVEH: While that may or may not be the case (you took
the quote
I was showing how the Apostle deals with info that is not FAITH PROMOTING
Jetison it!
Boy this is really eating you up.
Would you feel better if I said Everyevangelical"?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: The problem with your logic on this Kevin, is that you failed to connect the
It isn't 'fear' that I'm projecting on to you,
Kevin. You seem a sincere, if misguided, fellow.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 18:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Don't project your fear
will, of course but, at least you got asked.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 23:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Dont you, Lance? If
not, youre lost-er than I thunk!!! Izzy
Well first of all they are shocking!
"Some things that are true are not very useful."
some LDS bend the truth to fit the prophets
someLDS bend the prophets to fit the truth
Besides it is only their opinion right?
The term ANTI is a device for member protection from "TRUTHS that are NOT USEFUL"
question was:Why not replicate in front of 'your' Mosques what you do at Mardi Gras, Super Bowl etc.? You won't and, for good reason.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 18:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Want to come
:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
We do - you SIT
We preach - you lecture on what you do not
doLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I looked at the photo-journal of the SPer's
Linda asks 'Don't you, Lance?' of the query: 'Do you believe Satan to have been the inspiration for both the Koran and the BOM'? I doubt that either was inspired by Satan. IFF you, Kevin and Perry actually KNOW THIS TO BE THE CASE then, lay it out for a misguided 'lib'. None of you will, of course but,
Izzy, I doubt Lance takes Satan seriously, didn't you know the last demon
died along with the
last apostle? We've now got it all wrapped up with our "incarnation"
doctrine. jt
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:32:58 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linda asks 'Don't you, Lance?' of the
vin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
We do - you SIT
We preach - you lecture on what you do not doLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the photo-journal of the SPer's trip. What a waste! A Muslim country? You l
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I might if i get a chance (time)
Ibelieve it to be the same "caractor"
Don't know that I could provide an airtight case, but there is much
similarity
Why bother when there
20, 2005 18:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Don't project your fear onto me. Stay at home you might wet yourself.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, there's a collection of pictures I'd enjoy having a look at.Of course y'all do this with the same frequency as the others, eh
reason.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 18:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Want to come with us to a muslim country to
for this,
Lance
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I might if i get a chance (time)
Ibelieve it to be the same "caractor"
Don't know that I could provide an airtight case, but there is much
t: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Izzy, I doubt Lance takes Satan seriously, didn't you know the last demon
died along with the
last apostle? We've now got it all wrapped up with our
"incarnation" doctrine. jt
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:32:58 -0400 "Lance Muir"
Will your honor instruct the witness to answer the
question as asked?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Yes we do you not whereof you speak.
We have
Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I might if i get a chance (time)
Ibelieve it to be the same "caractor"
Don't know that I could provide an airtight case, but there is much similarity
Why b
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Could be God has given these ppl over to a 'reprobate mind' Lance.
It's a possibility isn't it? Anyway
no prophecy of scripture was ever written by the 'will of man' and no
individual will ever
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
We do - you SIT
We preach - you lecture on what you do not doLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the photo-journal of the SPer's trip. What a waste! A Muslim country
Perry actually KNOW THIS TO BE THE CASE then, lay it out for a misguided
'lib'. None of you will, of course but, at least you got
asked.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent
t: June 20, 2005 18:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Want to come with us to a muslim country to preach?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, there's a collection of pictures I'd enjoy having a look at.Of course y'all do this with the same frequency as the others, eh? Will you tell whi
ear
not.HMM?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
We do - you SIT
We preach - you lecture on what you do not
doLance M
glory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
We do - you SIT
We preach - you lecture on what you do not doLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the photo-journal of the SPer's trip. What a waste! A Muslim country? You live in one. As for both trips; the o
Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Could be God has given these ppl over to a 'reprobate mind' Lance. It's a possibility isn't it? Anyway
no prophecy of scripture was ever
Name:Kevin Rank:SPGeneral Serial
#:666
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 10:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Are you still looking for my Name Rank Serial number?
Is that it?Lance Muir
Lance Muir wrote:
Linda asks 'Don't you, Lance?' of
the query: 'Do you believe Satan to have been the inspiration for both
the Koran and the BOM'? I doubt that either was inspired by Satan. IFF
you, Kevin and Perry actually KNOW THIS TO BE THE CASE then, lay it out
for a misguided
, 2005 11:54
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Lance Muir wrote:
Linda asks 'Don't you, Lance?' of the query:
'Do you believe Satan to have been the inspiration for both the Koran and
the BOM'? I doubt that either was inspired by Satan. IFF you, Kevin
Just as I feared. Tsk, tsk.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 4:33
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Linda asks 'Don't you, Lance?' of the query: 'Do you believe
I am not saying that Satan is responsible for all evil,
Lance. In the past, I have been guilty of much evil using my own
talents. Had the Lord not saved me, I would have had to pay for those
evils. Satan would not have been guilty, I would, and the punishment I
received I would have deserved.
of it. There
is altogether too much attribution of evil to Satan, IMO.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 14:56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I am not saying that Satan is responsible for all
evil, Lance
Not at all Lance; who is the 'father of lies'? If
a person is motivated by a 'lying spirit' then who would
you say is behind what they speak? Why did Jesus
tell the Jews who prided themselves on being
children of Abraham that they were of "their father the
devil"? Wasn't it because the truth
Clifton
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
June 21, 2005 14:56
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I am not saying that Satan is responsible for all evil,
Lance. In the past, I have been guilty of much evil using my own
talents. Had the Lord not saved me, I would
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 21, 2005 15:17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Not at all Lance; who is the 'father of lies'?
If a person is motivated by a 'lying spirit' then who would
you say is behind what
Lance Muir wrote:
I'll 'kill two birds with one
stone'. (Judy Terry) IFF GWB actually lied about the WMD who is
responsible for this? 1. Satan whom you describe and the 'father of
lies'. 2. GWB himself who might (please note that I said MIGHT) have
lied.
Lance I'm still waiting for you to prove heresy or
repent for calling me a 'heretick'
I say it has not been proven yet that there was no
cause for alarm
However, if in fact it was a lie and GWB was deceived
the ball is in Satan's court
If heis by nature a prevaricator - the ball is
still in
PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:01 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Lance I'm still waiting for you to prove heresy or repent for calling me a 'heretick'
I say it has not been proven yet that there was no cause for alarm
Save yer
country!Join the RNC and sponsorBB and _Mom's for the Truth_ on the
Evangelical banquet circuit with the Bill Gaither Band--that'll be only
$150 per ticket please-cash, check or credit [5 vol DVD or VCR event
memorabilia not included)?
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:01 -0400 Judy
natural dualistic
legalese--where her moral slipknot strategically loosens
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:52:39 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:01 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
if.. GWB was deceived the ball is in
Satan's court
If
: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:01
-0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Lance I'm still waiting for you to prove heresy or
repent for calling me a 'heretick'
I say it has not been
so America is ruled
by Satan--eh? (just like Osama says)
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:07:30 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
natural dualistic
legalese--where her moral slipknot strategically loosens
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:52:39 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
On
5 19:11:51 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I expect all heresy hunters (which presently are YOU andLance) to produce somesubstantial evidence from
God's Word that provesthisaccusation is founded in something other than rc traditional teachings.
Am still waiting judyt
On Tue, 21 Jun 200
That is what YOU say!!! jt
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:14:10 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so America is
ruled by Satan--eh? (just like Osama says)
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:07:30 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
natural
dualistic legalese--where her moral slipknot
Yes,by jove, I believe you have nailed it !! I checked the signiture and, in deed, it was the good professor.
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:50:34 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:52
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Lance Muir wrote:
I'll 'kill two birds with one stone'. (Judy
Terry) IFF GWB actually lied about the WMD who is responsible for this? 1.
Satan whom you describe and the 'father of lies
All who are on Osamas side raise
your handwe know which court you are in. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 5:14
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
so
your 'logic' is
'perfect' except it's not the ball, it's the RNC in Satan's
court
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:50:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:14:10 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so America is
ruled by Satan--eh? (just like Osama says)
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:40:22 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
|| All who are on
Osamas side raise your hand
listenwhile jtexplains
howyour vote for GWB iz a vote
forOsama:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:00:01
The term ANTI is a device for member protection from "TRUTHS
that are NOT USEFUL"
DAVEH: While that may or may not be the case (you took the
quote out of context, and did not connect it to ANTI by the
author.so it is not possible to determine if that is what the
author was suggesting), it
DAVEH: The problem with your logic on this Kevin, is that you failed
to connect the author's comment
"Some things that are true are not very useful."
.to the term anti-Mormon. While anti-Mormons may not give
truths that are useful, taking his comments out of context do not
support
DAVEH: I didme. But let me give you another, as you
probably think of me as being somewhat an angel. O:-)
I have a friend who was excommunicated from the Church for moral
sins, and remains a non member to this day. He is disabled, and is
relatively bitter about how life has treated
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DAVEH: FTR.I never claimed to be.
How about you..do you claim to be the Standard of Truth, Kevin?
Then on what basis do you declare. "To me, that
isn't logical at all."Are you not the std in this statement?
DAVEH: Nojust common sense.
Do I claim
: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
JD you are disingenious from the start. While claimingto be a
pastor and not a theologian you title thislittle rant against God's
Word'A heuristic consideration' which is'theological' - The word
isn't even found in a regular dictionary so
What does logic have to do with the price of fish?
It is my personal belief that God is logical but He is not bound by
logic to the point where this defines Him.
Yes Elijah was under the anointing of the Holy
Spirit when he mocked the prophets of Baal and God does
not change. Read Proverbs
I'm getting weirded out here; this is just too strange .. definitely a
system of "fleshworks"
and not anything akin to the faith "once delivered to the saints" - love
the hymn (the one about Jesus). jt
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
ROTFL
It does to me, Dave. Some SP ought to keep this in
mind when villifying their audience.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 00:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
DAVEH: As I understand your
Jt says 'it (heuristic) has nothing to do with
Scripture.' The Incarnation, IMO, is heuristic.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 19, 2005 16:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
In what sense is the incarnation heuristic? Because it is
your "systematic theology?" jt
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:07:04 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jt says 'it (heuristic) has nothing to do with
Scripture.' The Incarnation, IMO, is heuristic.
From: Judy Taylor
to the
possibility that any attempt to answer would be met with mockery?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 05:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
In what sense
Can you give us a "for instance" DaveH?
jt
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
DAVEH:
As I understand your position (and please correct me if I am
misunderstanding your position), many Christians (specifically you, in
this instance)
: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I'm not into "mockery" Lance which is something thatyou should have
observedby now.
Since the word involves some systematic way of learning then I am
assuming that you are using it to describe
a systematic theology which hasthe incarnation as it's pivota
I would think it would be more like Jeremiah (see Jer
13:1,2); this is obviously a one time object lesson to
the part of Israel Jeremiah was ministering to rather
than a pattern of behavior for all time. However, part of public
proclamation of Truth by nature involves exposing the lie
ofthe
I do disagree. My belief is that every "heuristic" construct of man
is but a "dead" letter and this includes Calvin's Institutes. It takes the
Spirit of God to make The Word a "living" Word and this only happens when a man
speaks "as the oracles of God" You may not see it now but believe me
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 06:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I do disagree. My belief is that every "heuristic" construct of man
is but a "dead" letter and this includes Calvin's Institutes. It takes
the Spirit of God to make The Word a "living&qu
I don't know about DavidM but I'm sure Kevin and Ruben
have encountered Muslims in their SP travels. I figure it
would be tit for tat (with truth on their side) since
Muslims call everyone and everything Western "the great Satan" My Scots
friend tells me that in the UK the Muslims have taken
Lay it out then Lance ...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:48:39 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I, JD, BT, JH et al am genuinely open to having
you show us the 'big holes' in our 'INCARNATIONAL SYSTEM'. I, for one, will
abandon it upon adequate demonstration.
From: Judy
: June 20, 2005 06:56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I don't know about DavidM but I'm sure Kevin and
Ruben have encountered Muslims in their SP travels. I figure it
would be tit for tat (with truth on their side) since
Muslims call everyone and everything Western "the
n adequate presentation of those 'holes'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 06:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Lay it out then Lance ...
On Mon, 20 Jun 200
Lance, you are the expert so it is up to you to show us your
"incarnational" system and then we will be Berean and examine it in the light of
God's Word. jt
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:21:01 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jt said 'BELIEVE ME, LANCE..THERE ARE BIG HOLES
IN YOUR
The point I see at the beginning is one of "contention"
and thisis not good or acceptable in a Church setting among believers
because love should cover until we all come into the
unity of the faith. However, when confronting false systems it
can not be avoided. Why do you think Paul had
so
the very system that you say has 'holes' then, what am I to make of
this?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 07:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Lance, you
in hand, 'confront'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 07:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
The point I see at the beginning is one of
"conte
Sent: June 20, 2005 07:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
I see holes in the little that I do understand which may evenbecome
a gaping cavern into sheol when the rest
is uncovered. If you are so sure it is solid then why the
accusation and hesitancy on your part Lance? Why
I believe that SP's should obey God and if he leads
them to the front of a Mosque then He will take care of them there because His
grace will not lead them where He can not keep them. My response to your
second question is Yes! because both revelations came from an
"angel of light" in clear
Very good point !!! It is that whichgives compliment to all else. Very good point !!
JD-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:07:04 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Jt says 'it (heuristic) has nothing
To deny the Incarnation is to be an atheist or something close to that understanding. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:34:31 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
You
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
Actually, it.was what the Jews were called back
then. there wereGentile believers with whom God had a
relationship of sorts.
JD
-Original Message-
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk
Noone is denying that the "incarnation" has a place; but that is
all. It is not the "whole enchilada" as the saying goes. Believing that
Jesus fulfilled the law and did it all and is sitting up there in heaven
"perfect" is not going to do anything for you so long as you are down here
You are going to reduce God to the "incarnation" -
incredulous!! Just proves you don't know the scriptures or the power of
God. This has got to be how all the rcc traditional
nonsense got started. jt
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:26:24 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very good point !!!
Exactly ...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:36:26 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The same commandments
were required of the gentile converts (Gers), JD. No differencethey were
all equally considered the children of God.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:41:59 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
Exactly ...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:36:26 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The same commandments were required of the gentile converts (Gers), JD. No difference?they were all equally considered the children of
th. AND, I believe it is the truth in YOUR LIFE, WHETHER YOU CARE TO ADMIT IT OR NOT.
JD
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:48:23 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumora
OK
So am I an ANTI?
why or why not
Any ANTi's on TT?
Do you accept Lindsay's definition?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: I didme. But let me give you another, as you probably think of me as being somewhat an angel. O:-) I have a friend who was excommunicated from the Church
DAVEH: You comments have brought to mind a few questions about
SPers. Perhaps Kevin or other knowledgeable TTers can respond..
Do SPer exist in antagonistic countries (viz Muslim)? Do such
countries allow such activities? And, do SPers back off when their
activities might incite
Why don't you just list just ONE critic who has NOT been called an ANTI. That would seem to be an EASY TASK!
E-Z . Please give usONE example of a well known critic who is not called an ANTI
I helped you out by cutting the list of possibles down since F.A.I.R has an extensive list of ANTI's
What standard of measurement are you using here, other than reference to yourself.? Help me out here Dave, seems "To me, that isn't logical at all." uses the standard Reference of DaveH.Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DAVEH: FTR.I never claimed to be. How about
They stole the MUSIC! And put new words to it!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting weirded out here; this is just too strange .. definitely a system of "fleshworks"
and not anything akin to the faith "once delivered to the saints" - love the hymn (the one about Jesus). jt
On Sun, 19
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused. I
thought you said that the incarnation doctrine was a teaching of man
- now, it appears that you do have a place for it. Let me say this
-- the Incarnation story is the story of Jesus and all that He did
and all that He is. He is the one who
Many things about God escape Human Logic. God is not restricted by the Physical LAWS he designed and instituted.You can not deduce the Truth without the Revelation of Jesus Christ. That Revelation is found in the BIBLE.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does logic have to do with the
What I said is that the incarnation happened and is a fact historically.
Making this doctrine as huge as it has become for someis a "teaching of
man" There is no indication that Paul or any of the apostles majored on
the incarnation; Paul preached the cross of Christ himself and he spoke
Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 00:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
DAVEH: As I understand your position (and please correct me if I am misunderstanding your position), many Christians (specifically you, in this instance) believe that everything written in the Bible
es me as a humanist or someone whose doctrine is to be feared and/or opposed ... right???
JD-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:04:42 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Small part? Would there be any 'gospel' whatsoever without it?
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 13:04
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused. I
al Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 06:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I would think it would be more like Jeremiah (see Jer 13:1,2); this is obviously a one time object lesson to
the part of Israe
Who was on the cross? What would the cross have
meant without God on it?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 13:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill
Cumorah
What I
: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I would think it would be more like Jeremiah (see Jer 13:1,2); this is obviously a one time object lesson to
the part of Israel Jeremiah was ministering to rather than a pattern of behavior for all time. However, part of public proclamation of Truth by nature involves
Thanks for yourcharitable judgement of me being guiltless,
JD.:) I am not all
that sure I deserve it, but Iat least think it a good thing to avoid
contention as much as possible. If I sense someone getting their steam up,
I soft-pedal it, or justbow out, hopefully in a graceful
manner.
The SPF preaches to Muslims here and abroad. We will be going to a Muslim contry this fall to preach. care to come along?
http://www.streetpreachersfellowship.com/England1.asp
SPF Muslims at Hyde Park
http://www.streetpreachersfellowship.com/England3.aspJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 06:56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
I don't know about DavidM but I'm sure Kevin and Ruben have encountered Muslims in their SP travels. I figure it
would be tit for tat (with truth on their side) since Muslims
believe of Mormonism? If you do then surely you believe that an SP, bullhorn and placard in hand, 'confront'?
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 20, 2005 07:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah
The point I
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
