- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/15/2006 9:11:56 AM
Subject: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
No, "anyone" is not included - only those who come with the right heart attitude.
God hides things from the "wise
My personal view is that the First Church committed it's first organizational sin when it confused assingment of task with assingment of position.
If "apostleship" is a position, " apostolic succession" is a necessity as is all the evils associated with position, maneuverings, the usurp of
Overcoming is of Divine Intervention and not of personal effort. That we partner in this effort is a given --- but God recieves ALL the credit because it is His work that brings the victory. Rev 2:26 is an indicative, not an imperative !!
The correct response to these words (Rev 2:26) ,
Here are some thoughts that figure into our dicussion of dualism. Seems worth sharing.
In 1985 I read an excellent article called "Worship: Foundation for Reality" by Steve Robbins, PhD, who was at that time pastor of a Vineyard in Oxnard, California. One of the things he explained was that
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 7:08:09 AM
Subject: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]I don't think you are hearing us properly David. WE/I am saying thatChrist did not
Because when we read you, we see a constant effort to misrepresent us and try to catch us in our words just as the scholars and Pharisees did to Jesus. On the other hand, the feedback you give us from how we represent you tells us that we are reading and understanding you just fine. David
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Differences
Because when we read you, we see a constant effort to misrepresent us and
try to catch us in our words just as the scholars and Pharisees did to
Jesus. On the other hand, the feedback you give us
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 4:10:54 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
Dean, Don't get me wrong, here. I do not believe the Catholic Church speaks for God. I am talking
No offense taken.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 4:10:54 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/6/2006 10:08:42 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
How do you define Idolatry John? If you are the one whom decides whatIdol is or is not-what do you do
My question, Dean, is where is the RAPTURE in the
Bible? My question, Dean, is where is sinless perfection in the Bible...and
on
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 07, 2006 10:48
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 11:04:55 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
My question, Dean, is where is the RAPTURE in the Bible? My question, Dean, is where is sinless perfection
Sent: January 07, 2006 11:49
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk]
Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 11:04:55 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/7/2006 12:09:24 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
Let us await Judy's response on this. 'Doctrines of Men'? All you already aware of alternate readings
-- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/6/2006 10:08:42 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Catholics and Idols (to Dean)
How do you define Idolatry John? If you are
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/5/2006 9:52:26 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Origin
Pray TO? Pray THROUGH? IMO, there is a
distinction.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 06, 2006 08:48
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk]
Cross
- Original Message -
From
Pray through whom? There is only ONE mediator
between God and man. Yet the rcc sanctions the rosary
where ppl chant over and over and over "Holy Mary
mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death"
So what is THAT all about?
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:59:39 -0500 "Lance Muir"
: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk]
Cross
Pray through whom? There is only ONE mediator
between God and man. Yet the rcc sanctions the rosary
where ppl chant over and over and over "Holy Mary
mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our
death"
So what is THAT
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/6/2006 8:59:34 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Pray TO? Pray THROUGH? IMO, there is a distinction.
cd: No, they are the same as the only way to the father is through Jesus Christ-He
I did in another post. No point in repeating.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 06, 2006 09:24
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk]
Cross
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/5/2006 9:52:26 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk
Do Catholics think of these statues as "idols.?" Are they not expressions of their faith in God and His Christ? None of the idols of the Message were attached to the Living God. The compaison, Dean, that you make is not a biblical one.
jd
-- Original message -- From:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk
Sent: 1/5/2006 10:13:21 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Do Catholics think of these statues as "idols.?" Are they not expressions of their faith in God and His Christ? None of
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk
Sent: 1/5/2006 10:13:21 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Do Catholics think of these statues
Wow. A very good post.
Thanks
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dean Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/5/2006 12:18:07 PM
-- Original message -- From: "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found the response I sent; here it is again. Have a blessed Christmas, iz
From: ShieldsFamily [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 6:30 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
Sorry if I misread you, jd. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005
9:29 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: FW: RE: [TruthTalk
Sent: July 18, 2005 16:37
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Lance wrote:
'When you equate your statement of the truth
with the truth itself, you've already begun to move
from the truth.'
In an attempt to understand you, let me ask you if this axiom of
yours
also
Correct doctrine is THE FAITH once delivered.
Problem is everyone disagrees on what that correct doctrine of THE
Faith is.
Some care not to find it.
--- Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, doctrines are always divisive. Agreement comes when we yield
to the faith once delivered to
So JD what do you say it is? Perichoresis, TFT,
Polyani, Kruger, the "incarnation"?
Bill's teachings? jt
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Correct doctrine is "THE FAITH" once delivered. Problem
is everyone disagrees on what that correct
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Correct doctrine is THE FAITH once delivered.
Problem is everyone disagrees on what that correct doctrine of THE
Faith is.
Some care not to find it.
--- Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, doctrines are always divisive. Agreement
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 18, 2005 15:57
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Correct doctrine is THE FAITH once delivered.
Problem is everyone disagrees on what that correct doctrine of THE
Faith is.
Some care not to find it.
--- Judy Taylor [EMAIL
Lance wrote:
'When you equate your statement of the truth
with the truth itself, you've already begun to move
from the truth.'
In an attempt to understand you, let me ask you if this axiom of yours also
applies to statements made by Jesus Christ concerning the truth. Are you
saying that the
Sorry he is extremely busy searching for it, and it takes more than a
lifetime of study to begin to come to the knowledge of the TRUTH.
--- Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So JD what do you say it is? Perichoresis, TFT, Polyani, Kruger, the
incarnation?
Bill's teachings? jt
On
, 2005 16:05
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John
16:13,14
So JD what do you say it is? Perichoresis, TFT,
Polyani, Kruger, the "incarnation"?
Bill's teachings? jt
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Correc
That's interesting Lance, why would you want to chat
off line? I thought we were all one
big happy family here, you know with relationship and
all that... Oh, and I'm not anyone's way
to the truth; you have a bookstore full of Bibles -
it's when you start doing it that you know
whether or
JD wrote:
Not one person on this site believes in
doctrines of men.
I do not allow a difference of opinion on
this issue. I have been led by the Spirit
into this statement and cannot, therefore,
be wrong.
Lance wrote:
'When you equate your statement of the truth
with the truth itself,
As to the former, NO!
As to the latter, I'd say approximate.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 18, 2005 16:37
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Lance wrote:
'When you equate your statement
Sent: July 18, 2005 16:54
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John
16:13,14
That's interesting Lance, why would you want to chat
off line? I thought we were all one
big happy family here, you know with relationship and
all that... Oh, and I'm not anyone's way
to the truth
I always permit people who show themselves 'friendly' to my 'doctrines of
men' to be as wacky as they wish!
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: July 18, 2005 16:33
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
JD wrote
When I quote "scripture" of course it is God's own
Word. He wrote it didn't He?
Do you think God is capricious Lance? Writing in
riddles? Expecting us to obey
something he makes it impossible for us to
understand? jt
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:01:44 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lance, let's dig into this a little deeper, shall we?
David Miller wrote:
Are you saying that the words of Christ have already
begun to move from the truth, just by virtue of the fact
that he made a statement of the truth?
Lance wrote:
NO!
David Miller wrote:
From your perspective, can
Lance wrote:
I always permit people who show themselves
'friendly' to my 'doctrines of men' to be as wacky
as they wish!
That's what I figured. Respect of persons / Double Standard. :-(
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt,
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
When you find it let us know, but don't you believe it is unknowable?
Therefore you will never be able to come to a knowledge of the truth.
Is believing that truth is unknowable any less disasterous than being
blown from one doctrine into another
In a message dated 1/29/2005 10:51:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there's an absolute difference betw 'accomodating' ppl (sinners) and 'accomodating' sin,
So many legalist cultists miss this point as to render it profound.
JD
- Forwarded Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:18:44 EDT
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] From the 10/04 "Real Simple"
magazine
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||
Please pass this on to TT...My son was running the so
"I've been walking forty miles of bad roadIf the
bible is right, the world will explodeI've been trying to get as far away
from myself as I canSome things are too hot to touchThe human mind can
only stand so muchYou can't win with a losing hand"
http://bobdylan.com/songs/thingshave.html
--
In a message dated 7/13/2004 7:20:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We think 'reality' through 'concepts'.
True, but there is a reality.
J
so do you
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:47:03 -0400 Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Satan loves to get hold of
our conceptual thinking..
In a message dated 4/3/2004 4:04:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Artemis of Ephesus
Hit the send button on this one, also.
John
In a message dated 4/3/2004 4:04:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evidently you've already heard all you want about I John. But I'm not convinced you heard all you need. Hence I'm posting this again.
Exactly the teaching I have received. Thank you for the effort and time
In a message dated 4/4/2004 1:41:35 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Artemis of Ephesus
Hit the send button on this one, also.
I sent this to judy --- actually I was trying to get it to Bill. Sorry bout that.
J
In a message dated 4/4/2004 5:46:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You'll have to ignore the Greek stuff. My font doesn't make it through the transition.
Bill, if you were sending me something, I did not get it.
John Smithson
In a message dated 4/1/2004 6:19:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He didn't fellowship with any of the disciples before calling them. He said "Come follow me" and they left everything and came.
But they did not stop sinning. He did not make THAT a requirement of
Which edition of the Nestle/Aland?Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where in your Nestle/Aland gk interlinear
I need Chapter and verse.Please judyt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/31/2004 8:37:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can anyone tell me where to
In a message dated 3/31/2004 4:19:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I inadvertently learned some things through all this today. jt
Sometimes and for some people that is the only avenue of education.
Grace
John
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:20:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill, if you want to discuss issues or ideas fine - but I will not get into strife and wrangling over emotional stuff with you on TT.
Judyt should be a writer for Saturday Night Live.
Again, Kevin, I am sorry. Again, Kevin, will you
forgive me?
bill taylor
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:46
PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Personal
Attacks
Maybe it has something to do
I never took offense. No problem."Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, Kevin, I am sorry. Again, Kevin, will you forgive me?
bill taylor
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re:
OK I see you change God's word to suit your theology
I did not know you were also a Greek authority, what translating commitees have you been part of?
The question is what scripture did Abraham Pharaoh have?David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin wrote: We now know ... that the scriptures
jt: I'm not arguing the point above but I
will say that it is
not only difficult, it all but impossible
to loveunless we love
God first and how does one love Him while
dismissing
His Word? No one is dismissing God's
word. I simply question that you are the only one who understands
We now know contrary to DAVEM's opinion, that the scriptures did exist before Mount Sinai. Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin, you still don't seem to understand the difference
between "Scripture" and "the word of God." The word of
God is
Kevin wrote:
We now know ... that the scriptures did
exist before Mount Sinai.
No, we do not know that Kevin. You offered some passages suggesting
that they indicate Scriptures speaking to Pharaoh and to Abraham. I
don't see it that way. I don't know how to discuss it with you, because
if
I already asked this question of William. Maybe you can get an answer.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Wm. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'm perfectly happy to use "soul" as a word -- don't get me wrong. But let's use it like the Bible does. It's a way of describing personhood in the
In a message dated 3/10/2004 4:18:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Welcome to TT John Smithson, you write in part:
"I am educated by the Word; I am entertained by history."
Truly wisdom from above,
judyt
Hi judyt: i am thinking we agree. Right?
God bless and I am
Be careful, if you follow the links out.
http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/melgibson-thepassion.html
at the end of this article
Monica Bellucci, the actress who plays Mary Magdalene in Gibsons movie, has is a famous pornography star in Italy ( The Passion of the Christ: An International Hoax,
Nobody ever said Jesus was born with a sin on Him. Nobody is born
with another's sin on them. People are born with the fallen nature which
we receive from AE.
Jesus is God. I have no trouble believing that He could have a
sinful nature in His fleshly body and still be holy and sinless.
Vince,
For what it's worth, which seems to be depreciating around here, I agree
with you. Please read my post, Please hear me out before ousting me.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE
Judy Taylor wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy Taylor wrote:
I believe we've discussed this word in the past. It is used of Moses when
he stood before Pharoah in place of God and it means judge/magistrate. Same
in Ps 82:6. However when satan tells Eve
Hi Judy,
Maybe it would be best if we just agree to disagree on this and wait to see
how the discussion unfolds.
Thanks,
Robert Trump
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Last words on Jesus had the same sinful flesh
I believe it would have been sin rather than fallen flesh that
would have disqualified Him to be the atoning sacrafice. His victory over
the fallen flesh is part of what qualifies Him to be our perfect high
priest (Heb 4:15).
vincent j. fulton
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:33:16 -0500 Judy Taylor
DAVEH: I'm hesitant to jump into another's discussion, but it sure
seems to me that the simple answer to this may be realized IF one
considers that children may not be born with sinners, but rather they
become sinners when they learn to discern right from wrong.and then
choose wrong
Judy,
I suspect that the Kinston clan neither recognizes, nor seeks, civil
marriages. I would guess they have their own methods of consumamting
marital union.Therefore, under the law, they would not be polygamists, and
to prosecute them an actual violation of the law, like sex with a minor,
Is it reasonable to take the position,
below, Judy, re: K's (Morman) post, but unreasonable to [discuss, as
factually/detailed as possible, e.g.,] the immediately following (Evangelical)
post(?):
http://OzG2004.blogspot.com
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:05:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What
Judy,
Corona, California, is 45 M. ESE of LA in Riverside County. The pastor of
Crossroas Church in Corona (California) is Barry McMurtrie. He is a biggie
in the church growth moverment, and frequently is a speaker and presenter at
church growth conferences around the world.
We attended
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy wrote:
Not only that but women were used
in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves
we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and
apostles who were female
DAVEH: ??? Where do we find female apostles in the Bible?
Judy:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:30:58 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The devil is identified as an Angel of light in the Bible and the
book Mormon Doctrine.
Blaine: The devil is not identified as an Angel of Light, Kevin, he is
identified as PRETENDING to be an Angel of Light.
Kevin wrote:
The devil is identified as an Angel of light in the Bible and the
book Mormon Doctrine.
Blaine Writes: I knew that was going to be your theme song, Kevin.
Again, I ask, if you know the answers, why even ask me the questions?
Sorry, but I am not going to allow myself to get
Then why do you call Moroni an Angel of light?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,I assure you the PH was restored on the date given. I used to celebratethis even as a boy, with others who had been ordained to the A PH. Thepriesthood after the order of Aaron as it exists in the LDS church todayhas many
You assure me?I should rest my eternal destiny on your assurance?A slip-up?What if your soul slips through the cracks?Look what a slip-up did to the space shuttle.Who did the slip-up? Joe the prophet or your god?Are these matters important enough to want a full assurance even from external
Blaine: This happened on May 15, 1839. John appeared as an angel of light
Interesting that you would give us the date of the bestowing of the LOWER priesthood.
Can I look up the account in the local paper of the time?
Here is what I really need to know.
If this did not happen LDS have NO
DaveM wrote:
It is a shame because they are teaching them
that authority comes from man instead of from God.
** Blaine:
Dave, you should know better than tosaythis.You
know that"they"(LDS) teach that all authority to act in God's
name comes from God--It is called priesthood authority. It
Non-Christians have no right to tell Christians how to behave as Christians. (How would a faux-Christian know???) Izzy
I like the faux-Christian idea, wish I thought of it. This makes sense! Should I let SATANISTS tell me how to conduct the Lords ministry? How about INFIDELS? APOSTATES? AGNOSTICS?
**Is the Mormon Temple in SLC a public arena?The actions of some of those who feel the need to be engaged in it may lose this right for all of us. I wrote:Is the above completely honest? (not being interested in converting anyone to a religion or belief)I've seen lots ofnotch counting here and
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/22/2003 4:56:54 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] I found it Blaine...but you lost it
**Is the Mormon Temple in SLC a public arena?The actions of some of those who feel the need to be engaged in it may lose
Spirit of Godinspired the apostle Paul to write that we are only to judge
ourselves and those within the body of Christ or Church
Only to judge ourselves those inside the church
Where did you get those limits on your judgement?
My BIBLE says 1 Co 2:15 "But he that is spiritual judgeth ALL
I am not accusing, do you FEEL accused?
Iam simply stating I love getting told how to witness to the Lost by those that NEVER witness to the LOST. It is the wierdest thing!
same crowd that says Street preaching does not work.
It does not work for them for the same reason hunting never bags me a
I am absolutely NOT saying God is unjust.
he will Judge people in righteousness. he cast people into hell. i am just saying he shows NO LOVE to those that are in Hell. I am just saying he is a God of love AND a God of Righteous Judgement. One of those judgements is casting people in hell.
SMILE
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 9:44:27 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
whose sin did the Ap Paul 'stand against'; in the NT, how did hego about it?
Dean writes:
All manner of sin and he went about it by publicly declaring
BlaineRB
AMEN!!!
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:47:00 -0500 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Dean wrote:
I am Commanded to love a believer in Christ -
not those of the world nor wordily things-
Brother Dean, you know we think alike in many ways. Here is a
passage
for you to chew on.
Dean wrote:
Do you see any limits to that love? Should I love those
mentioned below? Would love be to invite him in-feed him
and give him a bed-then why should I send him away as
direct in the below passage? Who then is this speaking of?
And if we are so strong- why are we directed to not
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/17/2003 8:21:56 PM
Subject: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] The False Teacher
DIV style=""background: " #cc\?Love them and invite them to you house- or stay away from them?
DIV style=""background: " #cc\?
DIV
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 12:06:08 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:47:00 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven
check out 1 Tim 6
,Dean--do some more studyin'
gentleman
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:24:50 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 12:06:08 AM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 6:54:06 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
check out 1 Tim 6 ,Dean--do some more studyin'
Dean writes:
I see-be meek,quite giving no offence-not act as a fool-as it would seem that you believe I
PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 6:54:06 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love
or Rebuke?
check out 1 Tim
6 ,Dean--do some more studyin'
Dean
writes:
I see-be
meek,quite giving no offence-not act as a fool-as it would seem that you
believe I have erred from
- Original Message -
From:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/18/2003 7:51:55 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love or Rebuke?
Dean, You asked meabout the Ap Paul's love (in this context)--and i'd say, do nothin' different than he suggested to Tim (e.g., ch6/1Tim)
Dean writes
Subject: Re: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Love
or Rebuke?
Dean, You asked
meabout the Ap Paul's love (in this context)--and i'd say, do nothin'
different than he suggested to Tim (e.g.,
ch6/1Tim)
Dean
writes:
The love Paul
had was also kindled with a strong sta
Judy: How can you care for them and show them the love
of Christ without walking in love toward them?
Faith cometh by hearing
How shall they hear except they preach?
What is your answer?
Seems like you have a better answer "lifestyle" evangelism?
How about "friendship" evangelism?
Go ye into
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
