I found the issue. The TrustedCABundle.pem was in relative path to process
folder. In services this is not working as the current path is not the path
of the exe!!
Best Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 08:36, Fastream Technologies ga...@fastream.comwrote:
No error message. The background
No error message. The background exception handler catches it silently.
Regards,
SZ
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 08:07, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to run our tsslhttpcli service against _any_ SSL web site
such as
Hi,
at first you should get atest ICS source code and OpenSSL DLLs from
http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download
The problem with undeclared identifiers is easily solved by rebuilding
the project, a simple compile is not enough after changing the USE_SSL
directive.
--
Arno Garrels
Hi Arno, thank you for replying.
I rebuild the project every time the problem occurs.
I even uninstall the whole package and install it again.
First times it works fine without problems.
And then, starts reporting about undeclared identifiers of
SSL-components. Only for SSL components.
It's
Hi all,
I corrected the problem, thank you Arno and Francois for helping.
I did not have USE_SSL enabled but although it was not enabled, the
first times the build was succesful with SSL support - I don't know why.
Anyway, now I have rebuilt the whole package with USE_SSL and it's fine.
Thank
Dimitris Botsis wrote:
Hi Arno, thank you for replying.
I rebuild the project every time the problem occurs.
I even uninstall the whole package and install it again.
First times it works fine without problems.
That's because the package is built with USE_SSL enabled by default.
However you
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I have received the below report from a tester. What could be the
cause of it, any idea?
From the stack trace it looks like the exception is raised
in TComponent.RemoveFreeNotifications of the CtrlSocket.
Is the SslContext or an IcsLogger instance shared
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Dear Arno,
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I have received the below report from a tester. What could be the
cause of it, any idea?
From the stack trace it looks like the
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Dear Arno,
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
I have received the below report from a tester.
Dear Arno,
I have written the below code after your suggestion and wish to get your
feedback before uploading as a beta:
void __fastcall ReverseProxyClientThread::Execute() // multiple worker
client objects, both TSslHttpCli's and THttpConnections are in the context
of this
{
// Place thread
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Dear Arno,
I have written the below code after your suggestion and wish to get
your feedback before uploading as a beta:
I can't say whether it's OK or not. Just make sure that all your
TSsl objects in that thread are assigned a SslContext created
in the
I wonder if this is the case with Win2008R2 as well...
SZ
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
FYI:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2484921/strange-threads-in-application-in-win7-wow64
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your
I have made some more tests on my Win7Pro and saw that MS was clever enough
to raise the 1 handles per process limit in newer Windows'. I think the
new limit is something like 24-25000. To support 20k connections with ICS,
we still need to raise the WH_MAX_MSG though. Any comment on making
Not sure how the debug GUI exe works but I found a solution for the
service:
In ...WndControl.pas,
const
TIcsWndControlVersion = 110;
CopyRight : String = ' TIcsWndControl (c) 2002-2008 F. Piette V1.10
';
WH_MAX_MSG = 400; == MODIFIED THIS from 100
so that it
Hi and welcome back Francois.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Francois PIETTE francois.pie...@skynet.be
wrote:
Not sure how the debug GUI exe works but I found a solution for the
service:
In ...WndControl.pas,
const
TIcsWndControlVersion = 110;
CopyRight : String = '
Hi Arno,
Not sure how the debug GUI exe works but I found a solution for the service:
In ...WndControl.pas,
const
TIcsWndControlVersion = 110;
CopyRight : String = ' TIcsWndControl (c) 2002-2008 F. Piette V1.10 ';
WH_MAX_MSG = 400; == MODIFIED THIS from 100
so
Here is what I have done more: - attached the debugger to service process
and got,
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icserror8.png
Hope you can help,
SZ
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Fastream Technologies
ga...@fastream.comwrote:
Hello,
When under stress test, the service -project- crashes and
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Here is what I have done more: - attached the debugger to service
process and got,
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icserror8.png
ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY 8 (0x8)
--
Arno Garrels
Hope you can help,
SZ
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Fastream Technologies
Yes I see but under the same computer, same Win7Pro, same 4GB RAM, the GUI
-debug- project that does exactly the same thing works very well!! I am
trying to push the 32-bit compiler to its limits.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Yes I see but under the same computer, same Win7Pro, same 4GB RAM,
the GUI -debug- project that does exactly the same thing works very
well!!
I guess both use the same ICS, isn't it?
So most likely something in your service-code makes the difference.
--
Arno
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
I use Codegear2010 C++-builder and have a strange problem. The
following code gives me the error:
--
TWSocketServer * WSocketServer1=new TWSocketServer(this);
WSocketServer1-Listen();
-
No problem here, of course I get a socket
Of Arno Garrels
Sent: 10. mars 2010 14:39
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange bug in WSocketServer
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
I use Codegear2010 C++-builder and have a strange problem. The
following code gives me the error:
--
TWSocketServer * WSocketServer1
anybodys time.
Regards
Bjørnar
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of Arno Garrels
Sent: 10. mars 2010 14:39
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange bug in WSocketServer
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
I use
Hello Arno,
I see in the log that there is 5 seconds delay between DATA and the
10054 error. This may be interesting.
During this delay do you send data ? I say this because some server
will close cnx if no data transmitted fast enought and do not receive
data for xx seconds, usually the
Dod wrote:
Hello Arno,
I see in the log that there is 5 seconds delay between DATA and the
10054 error. This may be interesting.
No, the delay is 2 minutes and 5 seconds.
One thing I can imagine is a problem with MTU Discovery,
since small packets (SMTP command/response) go thru,
may be the
did you try telnetting manually to the smtp server, or use another
client ? maybe some antivirus stuff involved ?
AG Dod wrote:
Hello Arno,
I see in the log that there is 5 seconds delay between DATA and the
10054 error. This may be interesting.
AG No, the delay is 2 minutes and 5 seconds.
On May 4, 2007, at 10:02, Fastream Technologies wrote:
I would not believe -before trying myself- this is what M$ called
rewriting of TCP/IP stack!!
It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally
crippled to prevent you from using the client version for any
*Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way
to by-pass?
*From:* DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally
crippled to prevent you from using the client version for any
high-performance communications, and force you
, May 05, 2007 9:51 AM
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to
by-pass?
*Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way
to by-pass?
*From:* DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 9:51 AM
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to
by-pass?
*Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way
to by-pass?
*From:* DZ-Jay
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
*Subject:* Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way
to by-pass?
*From:* DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may not be a code efficiency problem, it may be intentionally
crippled to prevent you from using the client version for any
high
http://xp-antispy.org/
Mine was from LvlLord, but looking in my folder it seems my latest Sophos
anti-virus has deleted it... Hopefully Anti=Spy will last longer.
Windows 2007, a I'm currently downloading
I wonder why thr shop dislike me and won't let me download it!
Angus
--
To
Yes that's what I guessed as well but if it's inherent to Vista then
Vista is not much suitable as server OS. I wonder if the issue is in
client side or server sockets? Unfortunately I sold my other desktop
and my laptop in in service so I cannot check against XP/2003.
Best Regards,
SZ
On
, 2007 2:53 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any way to
by-pass?
Yes that's what I guessed as well but if it's inherent to Vista then
Vista is not much suitable as server OS. I wonder if the issue is in
client side or server sockets? Unfortunately I
-
From: Darin McGee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:00 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any
way to by-pass?
That's way Vista is sold as a client OS and Microsoft sells
separate server software. Also, read your XP
it back as the box is opened, will hang on to it
till we can get something bigger better and much faster to load it on.
Dave B.
-Original Message-
From: Darin McGee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:00 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Recently I have upgraded my workstation to Vista Business 64-bit and
face the following problem:
- when run against IE7 or any other server, the ICS stress tester that
I posted here before as well as Socrates, get into strange behavior:
1) After 1-2
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
When I use the UNC name as \\server\sharedFolder it works in
FindFirst but not z:\ where Z:\ is actually mapped to sharedfolder
under the same admin account in Windows. This happens with Win2003,
XP.
Drive mappings are not available in services by
I cannot capture local packets with Ethereal! Anyone know how to do it?
Also, it may be worng to say that ethereal changes behavior. I may be wrong.
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: Francois PIETTE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Friday,
Hi,
Is there a proxy setting on the second PC? That's what my problem was once.
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: Ionut Muntean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:31 PM
Subject: [twsocket] Strange
Hi,
I'm experiencing a strange
Ionut Muntean wrote:
I'm experiencing a strange behavior of WSocket.Connect -
WSocket.OnSessionConnected. I have 2 PC. One on which I develop my
applications and a laptop. Both of them are Windows XP Proffesional with SP2
installed. The server my application is connecting is on the same 100
Do you use symbolic names for the target host?
What are your DNS settings on both machines?
Maybe the DNS on the second machine is having a hard time resolving the name
(i.e. a dead or not available DNS server specified first).
- Original Message -
From: Ionut Muntean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm experiencing a strange behavior of WSocket.Connect -
WSocket.OnSessionConnected. I have 2 PC. One on which I develop my
applications and a laptop. Both of them are Windows XP Proffesional with SP2
installed. The server my application is connecting is on the same 100 Mbps
LAN as the 2 PC's
for the quick response.
/ Ionut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Florin Vancea
Sent: 6 decembrie 2005 05:19 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
Do you use symbolic names for the target host?
What are your DNS settings on both
The telnet connection on the specified port on the server is working well.
:(
/ Ionut Muntean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francois Piette
Sent: 6 decembrie 2005 05:23 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
I'm
' twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
Of course, the first thing I thought was that there is a DNS problem so
I've
used numeric ip addresses in the Addr field. The result is the same. :(
Anyway, the both machines are using the same (local) DNS
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
Save some time, pick the big gun :)
I mean: Start the packet monitor (you said it's a WXP-SP2) and see what's
happening first hand on each machine.
And please post back, as it looks interesting...
- Original Message -
From: Ionut
Excuse my ignorance, but please, is there a packet monitor in Window$ XP?
I
am a Linux user, and now I am forced to develop an windows app. :(
Use Ethereal. Link on the link page at my website. It's a free tool.
I'm using LanWatch which is a commercial tool. Search Google...
--
Contribute to
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: Ionut Muntean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'ICS support mailing' twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
The telnet connection on the specified port on the server is working
2005 06:24 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
Save some time, pick the big gun :)
I mean: Start the packet monitor (you said it's a WXP-SP2) and see what's
happening first hand on each machine.
And please post back, as it looks interesting...
- Original Message
, as it is also used for the (*nix users wellknowed) qmail.
10x again,
/ Ionut Muntean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francois PIETTE
Sent: 6 decembrie 2005 07:56 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
The telnet connection
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francois PIETTE
Sent: 6 decembrie 2005 07:56 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
The telnet connection on the specified port on the server is working well.
:(
OK, so let's try with one of the ICS provided demos so that we are sure
PROTECTED]
To: 'ICS support mailing' twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange
TnClient is behaving the same strange way. TnClient displays: Connecting
to
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and then Connected but the welcome banner of the server
is displayed
Thanks Wilfred, but I need to send the next message only after I receive the
ok from server.
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
Hello Larini,
I'm getting unstable times, from 70 ms to 3 seconds.
This can happen. It is depending the traffic on the network. If very
heavy on a large network it _can_
Hello Larini,
I'm getting unstable times, from 70 ms to 3 seconds.
This can happen. It is depending the traffic on the network. If very
heavy on a large network it _can_ take a while.
while gWait do
begin
application.ProcessMessages;
sleep(1);
end;
This is not needed, you only waste CPU
55 matches
Mail list logo