Have William Hill dropped UniVerse now?
They used it as the back end to their on-line betting, I believe. If
they're still using it, they're a good site to quote as they are one of
the big UK bookmakers.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Charles Barouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reynolds Reynolds?
Look on the u2ug web site - you might find the story there. They spent
MILLIONS converting their product to SQL-Server, and the SQL version
floated about as well as a lead balloon. They ended up scrapping it.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Mark Eastwood
wIntegrate certainly has this.
We had a mix of Wyse50s, the odd PT250, and wIntegrate configured as a
PT250. As the user logged in, LOGIN printed esc ctrl-e to the screen
(at least, I think that's what it was) and read the response. That way,
we (usually) didn't have users asking us is this a
When you installed your previous version of wIntegrate, did someone
customise it for you?
I don't remember it as being able to handle a 80/132 switch - on our
system I had to code the switching escape sequences into pt250.wis
myself, and I also had to edit the PTERM code so it used those
I'm trying to get a working Gentoo at home. That's a game and a half :-)
When I succeed I'll likely try and create an ebuild to install UVPE. Be
nice to get that officially into portage :-)
(I want to get a WordPerfect 8 ebuild working, too :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From:
If it's a *nix box, just fire up a bash shell, and enter the command
uv.
(That's for UniVerse, of course. YMMV for UD.)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Dave Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2007 07:14
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] A couple of
Well, when I read that comment about READNEXT having to return file as
well as key - actually it *already* returns a lot more than just key -
try doing a SELECT WHEN.
I guess partfiles would be easier - the problem with partfiles (and I
hit this in my last job) is that the database must be able
I don't think you can just read the file sequentially ... you can't do
it in BASIC, therefore you can't do it with InterCall.
In BASIC you do a SELECT, then a READNEXT, then a READ. You should be
able to do exactly the same with InterCall.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: pam
don't know how to make a selec list
with the ic_execute.
Thanks
Pamela
On 21/05/07, Anthony Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you give a bit more detail as to what you mean I receive the data
in a different way when the select statement change.
A BASIC select, or a simple RETRIEVE select
the data. I will investigate more but
I
you have any idea i will apreciate it!!
Thanks again you give me a great idea.
Pamela
On 21/05/07, Anthony Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OOWWW
I don't know what to suggest here ... but I do know what's happening.
You're using a SQL SELECT
Sounds like you've got a big iron system :-(
There's no chance you could get an old machine (or create a partition on
a newer machine) and install the old version of UV? Okay, there's
licencing issues but hopefully IBM shouldn't mind if all you're doing is
trying to get yourself out of a hole.
I *think* this is historical.
It used to be that ON ERROR didn't exist (I don't think ELSE existed
initially!). So I guess that ELSE was added to deal with failed writes but not
with file isn't there type problems, then ON ERROR was added to deal with
those.
I think originally, when even ELSE
Actually, that's not obvious at all :-)
My prototype code for MaVerick's dynamic files (and no, that code is not
part of Rob's MaVerick code) would never have run out on a delete.
Let's say I was merging two buckets - 5 and 13 for the sake of argument.
If 5 was the fullest I just reset the
I seem to remember a bug in garbage collection at some point. When did
it last run (time of day, not date!)?
There was something about it not working if the previous run was just
before midnight, because all time comparisons were earlier than the last
run so it couldn't calculate time since last
Can anybody explain this?
Our upgrade replaced CREATE.FILE etc, so it started creating short file
names. But ...
When this was fixed by doing a LONGNAMES ON, doing a CREATE.FILE
immediately afterwards still created a short file. Weird!
Cheers,
Wol
---
u2-users mailing list
You can use an EVAL or an i-descriptor.
For example, assuming your field is the ID, then EVAL @ID[2] will give
you the year, and EVAL FIELD(@ID, '*', 4, 1) will give you the route.
(or you could use field(5) for the year :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the same behavior as what you describe, so it
seems to be a bug which has come into 10.2.
Kurt Neumann
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: 06 June 2007 11:31 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] LONGNAMES
Probably not relevant ...
I know some early Demon broadband adopters had nightmares when BT
upgraded their kit. Because it wouldn't affect any subscribers they
did it without informing any ISPs, with the result that when customers
complained the ISPs didn't have a clue.
If you were an early
From your original post, there's nothing wrong that I can see.
You and Patti are inside the local network, therefore UD is seeing your
local network address.
John Smith is logged in over the internet, therefore he shows up with
the address assigned to his router (if he has one). His address may
If it has been changed, it should be logged as a bug!
It's QUITE NORMAL for the 24hr clock to go over 24 hours - many places
work on the basis that you always start and end a shift on the same day
- I believe London Underground are one.
As such, a shift ending at 28.30 is normal practice ...
How important is rapid response (and how do you define rapid? :-)
I presume you've got another outer loop round this lot - if not you can
create one. Get your ls command to return the file size, and save the
old output.
Now, each time through the inner loop, you compare filesize against the
From your description, it should be possible to run two instances. Just
create two users, move the /etc/profile code to .profile, and have
/etc/profile instantiate two daemons - one per user.
I don't know the details, but if all VSI-FAX is using is environment
variables, then that's just standard
Why do you need uvbackup?
I'm NOT recommending that you don't use it, but a while ago I had a
linux box, a SCO box, and a Windows box, and quite happily copied UV
files between all three of them using the OS-level copy command. Bearing
in mind they all run on Intel chips, and byte order is a chip
machines.
Also, it gets rather tedious setting up the many VOC entries for the OS
files again.
Cheers,
David Murray
.learn and do
.excel and share
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:05 PM
Your memory is faulty :-( though I would advise people to do what you
suggest.
We've had serial cards plugged in the back of servers and they worked
fine (when they worked...). But if you have any sense, you do tend to
stick a network card into a printer, or plug it into a dedicated
printserver
Maintain it against the part files (mind you, I'd just declare them
DYNAMIC and let UV sort it out).
In a distributed file, each individual part file is just an ordinary
file, with a little bit of extra logic that hashes the ID to say is
this record permitted in this file. You can treat the
Actually, this could be a VERY OLD feature ... :-)
I seem to remember it being documented that HASH.HELP and
HASH.HELP.DETAIL (or similar) had a habit of disagreeing with each other
on Prime INFORMATION. Now that's going back some ... !
Anyway, the advice always was don't trust HASH.HELP. Suck
Off the top of my head - AND CHECK TO MAKE SURE...
You can't create triggers (or indexes, or anything like that) on the
master, because it only exists as a record in PARTFILES).
But - and I'm pretty sure this is true of indices at least - if you try
and create an index on the master, it will
27.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
On 6/21/07 Anthony Youngman wrote:
You can't create triggers (or indexes, or anything
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 8:30 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Trigger(s) on distributed file
That's weird ... has that changed at all recently?
I used to create multiple masters by hand and never did
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 10:16 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Trigger(s) on distributed file
Then things really are confusing ... I'm talking about the file-type
What are you trying to say here? You don't make sense (sorry).
Not knowing UD, I have to be careful here, but if I'm selecting BY.EXP a
multi-value field, I would NOT expect the number of records selected to
be the same as the number of items in the select list.
I'm getting the impression that
Any reason you're not putting it on a secure encrypted UV server? (I
believe the latest version of UV does native encryption ... :-)
If it's not a 1-1 record-row match, then SQL-Server will be unlikely
to match UV for speed.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Banker
PLEASE put stuff like this on PickWiki.
It's a wonderful place to put snippets, small programs, etc etc.
The one thing to watch out for about a user group keeping a repository
is that there's copyright issues involved. If you wrote the utility, you
can put it on PickWiki, or in a repository, or
Not sure what you mean by checked another box, but it does sound very
like a paths problem. What user is the phantom running as? What does
that user's .profile contain? Could the user launching the phantom drop
to the linux command line and run bin/uv?
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
Ouch !!!
I can tell you WHAT is happening. How you solve it is a policy issue,
not a technical issue.
Basically, drive mappings are system-wide, not user-related. If you have
multiple processes/users all wanting their own unique drive mappings,
sorry it's not going to happen!
We had this exact
Subversion. Does this use GIT as a back-end now?
The old-style version control systems pretty much only worked with one
person being able to check out a file at a time. Sounds like Eugene
wants a distributed version control, and there's a choice.
But - AND CHECK IT OUT, I'M NOT SURE - I think
One other point. Have IBM fixed the problem they had with default
options on cpio? I know when I installed PE on SuSE ages ago, the SuSE
and RH defaults were different and I had to edit the install script.
It was one of those toggle issues - where RH was on by default and the
switch toggled it
I know you said don't tell me it's the base date, but the date 1/1/68
was chosen for a reason - it means divide by 365.25 actually gives the
right answer...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: MAJ Programming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2007 14:17
To:
Because the results are not (scientifically) reproducible. (Well, they
are for that one implementation...)
Because data storage is part of the Pick data model, we can be confident
that benchmark results are valid across all (similar?) implementations.
Because relational forbids knowing anything
are totally
relevant as a comparison of those two systems.
Anthony Youngman wrote:
Because the results are not (scientifically) reproducible. (Well, they
are for that one implementation...)
Because data storage is part of the Pick data model, we can be
confident
that benchmark results are valid across
To really throw the cat amongst the pigeons ... :-)
I recently started using the IF ... ELSE programming style precisely
*because* I found it *easier* to understand!
Depending on what X is, it can be a lot more comprehensible to write
IF X is true ELSE
Rather than
IF NOT X THEN
Especially if
Seeing as you don't say whether you're wanting to enable PIOPEN.EXECUTE
as a global option, or just in programs as you need to recompile them,
it's not clear what exactly your problem is. Two things ...
1. Look at using PERFORM instead of EXECUTE. I'm not sure of the
difference, but I strongly
Does !SETPTR (or !SET.PTR - can't remember) do what you want?
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Leckie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2007 09:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Getting current SETPTR values
Is there a way to get the values reported
Quite likely - it's Patch Tuesday, the second Tuesday of the month,
when MS releases a month's worth of security patches in one hit.
So that'll include XP, W2K if it's still supported, Office, and
everything else. There might not actually be a lot of Vista-specific
stuff in there...
Cheers,
Wol
The OP was worried about a Unix directory not being able to handle the
thousands of jpegs he had.
I can't offer help as to how to store binary in a hashed file (other
than what some other person suggested - convert it to ascii somehow eg
uuencode or whatsit64), but I think you may well be able to
What OS? How much RAM does your server have? Etc etc.
What's the likelihood that the data was on disk when you first ran the query,
and was pulled into the OS cache as a result? Second time round, the OS didn't
bother to access the disk because it was all in cache ...
Especially if your query
If you can find the IBM Bedfont Lakes website, I'm sure it lists hotels.
And if the hotel is within lurching distance of Heathrow Airport, last I knew
there was a courtesy bus that ran from the Airport (and from the local BR rail
station) approximately every half hour. But the airport itself is
Is it possible your work server is subscribed and you're on the internal
distribution list?
See if you can look at the email header to find out if it's been forwarded from
somewhere.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of doug
And an easy way to block that is to remove write access to the dictionary.
Iirc, you can't compile an EVAL if you can't compile an i-type. I believe that
was done for security reasons, but it may simply be that the easy way to code
it was to write a temporary item to the dictionary. Either way,
Just DON'T start a few flame wars over this :-)
I'd actually vehemently disagree with the original suggestion, for several
reasons. The two biggest are:
It introduces an extra variable. Any poor maintenance guy coming along has to
worry about whether it's used elsewhere. This sort of behaviour
Overflowed groups take longer to read, so you want to reduce the number of such
groups. Is the size of this file roughly constant, or does it just slowly grow?
If it's roughly constant, try setting a MINIMUM.MODULO at around 900,000. It'll
hopefully break up a lot of your badly overflowed
I must admit I prefer multiple exit points, but I'll throw a third variant into
the mix ...
OK = TRUE
IF OK THEN
Various statements that set OK to false if there's an error
END
IF OK THEN
More statements that set OK to false if there's an error
END
Rinse and repeat
RETURN
Cheers,
Wol
I think part of the problem is, because it says MINIMUM.MODULUS, we think of it
as analogous to the modulus of a hashed file. It isn't.
It's more of a hint to the system about how big the file is likely to be, and
how to avoid wasting effort.
So if you're creating a file and intend to load it
hours to complete finished
the other night in under 10 minutes.
Thanks a ton.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Badly overflowed
A second, far bigger adjustment (which will account for a lot of the
underestimate), is to divide by 1600, not 2000 or 2048.
A split factor of 80 means that your groups will, at maximum, be 80% full. 80%
of 2048 is 1640 (near enough).
That will give a second-cut (and rather more accurate)
Replying again ...
Having looked at the previous email, I notice that the if/else/endif was
originally #if/#else/#endif. Those #'s are important ... ignore my previous
solution and put the #s back.
Oh - and whether UCB is 1 or 0 - do man setpgrp and hopefully the answer will
be obvious ...
My C skills are rusty, but I think the two errors are
1) a misplaced curly brace - it's procedure (args) { body } so move the
first curly brace between the arguments and the variable declarations.
2) C doesn't have endif - get rid of it.
(Oh - and good programming practice - always put your
It's not quite true that HP-GL/2 is in all HP laser printers...
Although it predates PCL/5, when that came out with the LaserJet III, it was
included as a subset.
So it's not found on LaserJet IIs or Is (anybody still got any?), and it should
also be found any recent laser (or inkjet) that
I think IBM's versions officially work on Red Hat. Somewhere along the line one
of the cpio arguments' official meanings has been reversed, and I think RH
hasn't changed.
You're probably right in saying it's the c option, which now in most non-RH
distros has exactly the *opposite* effect that
Setting the terminal to 132 chars wide ...
I did that at another site. There's an @(-nn) setting (which you'll probably
have to define yourself - I don't think it's set by default in the files
provided by IBM).
And the TERM command doesn't do anything with it. However, you get the source
for
Thanks.
It's on UV, but we found the problem. The routine wasn't cataloged! What threw
me was that it worked sometimes, but I'm told that if you call a routine
locally it doesn't always need to be cataloged. So, obviously, sometimes the
call to load the subroutine looked in the right place and
The one problem with SAMPLE and SAMPLED is that, afaik, they are pseudo-random.
Unless your file is volatile, you are likely to get approximately the same
result set every time (or exactly the same result set, if your file hasn't
changed).
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
It's the classic UV is supported on Red Hat problem. The install script
doesn't understand the SuSE rc setup.
This all ought to be documented somewhere ... has somebody put a how to
install on SuSE FAQ on the u2ug wiki? If not, could someone put one there (I
did it so long ago, I've forgotten
PRINT CHAR(7)
I think you can also do PRINT @BELL
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent: 14 February 2008 15:32
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] [UB] Beep Error
How do I send a rudimentay ascii
Ah...
If that's what you want, then in BASIC
SELECTINDEX STOCK.ID FROM F.REPAIR
Should have exactly the same effect (and save the overhead of an EXECUTE). The
only difference is the resulting select list may not be sorted (although I
think it is).
If you then want to find what records are
Firstly, you should NEVER run AV software on a database server. It's known for
causing performance issues. By all means run a scan on the database from a
remote machine via a share ...
And you don't want it installed on the db server, because a lot of these things
have a nasty habit of
And be very careful with 4GLs using named common, as I found out many years ago
with PACE. It stored filepointers in named common, generating the common name
from the file name.
Fortunately we found the problem when the runtime complained of a redefinition
of common (one routine had the same
Not that I know much about this error but ...
What version of UV are you running? I've set up ODBC on both 9.6 and 10.2, and
the later version seems to be a lot more robust ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Bhyat
Sent:
- maybye 9.5 or possibly even 9.4
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 25 Jun 2008 12:41
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] UVODBC Account Activation
Not that I know much about this error
Schemas. The
fact you think you're running a very old version also means it may be (probably
is) a fixed problem by now...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 26 June 2008 09:42
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
I'm having a problem with ODBC ... I found a post about what looks like my
problem on gmane from 3 years ago but it wasn't very helpful ... it just said
we upgraded our software and it went away ...
Anyways, the error I'm getting is
ODBC--call failed.
[IBM][UVODBC][1401032]Error ID: 46
the same physical dictionary file and
one works while the other one doesn't ... which implies a data problem ... cue
headscratching here ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 30 June 2008 09:46
To: u2
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:01 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: ODBC problems
What's odd is it looks like it's the PC end getting the query wrong
before it sends it, but I've got two files sharing the same
I notice you're on nix ...
Is the piece of code that writes invoked via an EXECUTE or PERFORM from the
code that did the original READU?
I wouldn't expect it to on doze, but on Unix that *might* change the execution
environment enough to cause a problem... (grasping at straws to see if it
Just be warned - rtf isn't as portable as it's supposed to be. I wrote rtf
files from UV and they would read perfectly okay in some word processors and
not in others.
Oh - and just doing a read, save in Word of a file created in UV increased
the file size horrendously ...
There might be some
One of my colleagues brought a speed problem to me - he has two queries which
produce the same result but one (the proper modern SQL) runs slowly, and
the other (deprecated SQL) runs much faster. He was running them in a web
engine, so I ran them at TCL with the EXPLAIN keyword and got an odd
.
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Strange SQL query optimisation ...
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:34:32 +0100
One of my colleagues brought a speed problem to me - he has two queries which
Thanks.
If I add the no.optimize keyword, it changes all joins to an outer cartesian
join. So that's even worse ... (I haven't tried actually running it :-)
If a LEFT JOIN and LEFT OUTER JOIN are the same thing, that adds another
little oddity to the mix :-) Why is the optimiser using both
SSL direct from UV, or SSL direct from the UV server ...
If they're sending it to their internal mailserver, which is configured to
require SSL, or they don't have an internal mailserver and must use SSL to talk
out ...
I got the impression they wanted the CLIENT software to talk SSL, Postfix
The obvious place is for a vendor to add a page to PickWiki, and then any other
vendors add themselves to that ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Bergsagel
Sent: 29 July 2008 00:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
What help exactly do you need? Make sure that the @ID is listed in @SELECT or
whereever (I try to always list it as the very first field). That way, you can
simply JOIN the single-value table to the ASSOCiated table.
And have you seen the article on PickWiki? It's a bit out-of-date but still
Man chroot
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Results
Sent: 04 August 2008 14:59
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Linux Psuedo Directory
All,
I'm going blank on this one, all help appreciated. I want to create
Don't know about UD, but on UV you can switch on logging that will list all the
commands passed to UV. Only problem is, to describe it as verbose is an
understatement ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: 04
I've looked up the notes on our error and found the following
The object invoked has disconnected from its clients (-2147417848)
I don't know where that came from but it's the same error that you've got, and
I guess we found that somewhere in some documentation on OLE or whatever. So
what is
I'm trying to select a string that contains a single-quote, using the LIKE
operator. It works fine with EQ.
So if I do a SELECT FILE WITH FIELD EQ LLOYD'S , the select returns
exactly what I expect.
But if I do a SELECT FILE WITH FIELD LIKE ...LLOYD'S... it returns
pretty much the entire file
Relational theory requires you to abstract the database to fit a (badly flawed)
prescriptive theory of what data *should* be like. MV simply models the
database to look like the real world.
Relational scatters the data about individual real-world items across multiple
tables. MV (properly
Rather than writing a simple program ...
SELECT PARTS WITH EVAL DCOUNT(F1, '') GT 0
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Israel, John R.
Sent: 12 August 2008 21:59
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: TCL literal
Ooops ...
COUNT, not DCOUNT
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 13 August 2008 12:01
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: TCL literal select
Rather than writing a simple program ...
SELECT
I think you're muddling dynamic and dimensioned arrays - a dynamic array can't
have an element 0 :-)
Sounds like somebody, when writing jBase, saw the feature of -1 and thought
they'd be clever with 0.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Going down the linux route ...
IBM support RedHat, so look at RHEL or CentOS.
My choice would be Slackware or gentoo - not because they're better or worse
distros, but because you learn a lot more dealing with their oddities. Slack is
very BSD-oriented (or was), but is also very minimalist in
Yes, that would be nice BUT!
Ordinary members would be observers, and that's quite difficult to enforce on a
conference call.
What would be best if the call could be streamed so that anyone could listen
in, but (unless it's changed) the calls are courtesy of IBM on IBM's equipment,
and I
I looked at that SQL and thought what's wrong with double quotes? (but then I
don't know SQL that well). I thought quoting field names was mandatory if they
contained spaces and optional otherwise. Or should it be single quotes and
double is the problem?
I'm still having problems with the
MY_SELECTED_TABLE
It does conform to SQL...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:14 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Crystal Reports and UniData
I looked at that SQL
] Crystal Reports and UniData
Usually, the AS keyword is in use...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:18 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Crystal Reports
Which *ix? A philosophy (which I tend heartily to agree with) is if it ain't
broke, don't fix it. Unfortunately, that also often leads to vendors saying
it works for everyone else, why do you need it changed?.
Wonder what the limit is on RHEL? That's an *ux rather than an *ix so it
*should*
Closing a file apparently releases all the locks. There's an implied close in
read_prog, therefore the lock gets released.
To fix it, you need to remove the OPEN in read_prog, either by opening the file
in COMMON or passing the file pointer as an argument.
Yup, I agree that behaviour *might*
Bear in mind that ODBC is relational is set-oriented. There is NO CONCEPT
WHATSOEVER of order in sets, therefore if stuff comes out correctly ordered
it *must* *be*, *by* *definition*, down to pure chance (or an accident of
implementation).
If you want to guarantee it, you need to add an extra
There is, unfortunately, a question of market power here.
If Access and SQL-Server talk to each other, even if they use a *broken*
version of SQL to do so, the market place will expect other databases and
clients to talk the same - BROKEN - dialect of SQL.
It's all very well a vendor (like
Point 6 ...
I know you think that c:\ibm is nasty, but be aware that (I think it's UV
itself) does NOT like spaces in pathnames. I always accept the defaults, I've
had some weird problems installing in Program Files, the space means various
services fail to start.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
