Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:20 PM,openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM,openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
snip
To be honest, I don't see why Apache can't continue using the existing
infrastructure on openoffice.org?
Hi,
Answers in line.
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:20 PM, openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM,openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
snip
To be honest, I don't see why Apache can't continue using the existing
infrastructure on
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-04 11:04 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
For reasons that I cannot explain, some messages were delayed in going
to the e-mail. I received this one and a couple of others two days
later than I saw them on the archive of the list.
This happens. It was apparently a
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM,openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
snip
To be honest, I don't see why Apache can't continue using the existing
infrastructure on openoffice.org? incubator.apache.org sounds, to me, like
something which is in the early stages of development
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:20 PM, openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM,openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
snip
To be honest, I don't see why Apache can't continue using the existing
infrastructure on openoffice.org?
Thanks Larry, that's very interesting. I see the X-Sympa-To header.
What is quirky about that for me is I swear I *saw* them in the list archive
before September 4.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 22:36
NoOp - gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 09/02/2011 05:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-09-02 6:16 PM NoOp wrote:
I wonder if the OP (Rob Weir) will reply to my questions, or if he
simply intends to be a 'hit run' poster
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM, openoffice.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
snip
To be honest, I don't see why Apache can't continue using the existing
infrastructure on openoffice.org? incubator.apache.org sounds, to me, like
something which is in the early stages of development - which OOo
NoOp wrote:
On 09/02/2011 12:59 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-02 1:00 PM NoOp wrote:
Is that list setup for gmane.org?
Not yet. I asked on gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel . During the
discussion with Rob Weir
he asked if it was possible for me to request Gmane including the list.
From: Rob Weir r...@robweir.com
Please note that, as part of the overall migration to Apache, this
list will be closed. Based on feedback received, including from
participants on this list, we've decided to create a users list at the
Apache OpenOffice.org project to serve as a continuation
On 2011-09-02 5:18 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote:
A pointer to where in the gmane structure the new list will be would be greatly appreciated.
I dislike mailing lists with a purple passion an much prefer following this through the nntp
interface.
I expect it will be
For reasons that I cannot explain, some messages were delayed in going to the
e-mail. I received this one and a couple of others two days later than I saw
them on the archive of the list.
This happens. It was apparently a routing or email-queue kick-off quirk where
these messages arrive so
On 2011-09-04 11:04 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
For reasons that I cannot explain, some messages were delayed in going to the
e-mail. I received this one and a couple of others two days later than I saw
them on the archive of the list.
This happens. It was apparently a routing or
On 2011-09-02 8:02 PM NoOp wrote:
On 09/02/2011 06:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:25 PM, NoOpgl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snipsnipsnip
Actually /you/ *need* to post information in *this* list so that the
users of this list aren't left in the dark. You can't just 'hit run'
major snip
But my benefit and any other less well informed readers, what does ANN
refer to? And how does that relate to OOo? (I'm sure it does, I just
don't know how.)
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to
Sorry for the typo, I meant to say:
FOR (not but) my benefit and any other less well informed readers,
what does ANN refer to? And how does that relate to OOo? (I'm sure it
does, I just don't know how.)
On 9/3/2011 12:38 PM, Richard Detwiler wrote:
major snip
But my benefit and any other
On 2011-09-03 10:40 AM Richard Detwiler wrote:
FOR (not but) my benefit and any other less well informed readers, what does ANN refer
to? And how does that relate to OOo? (I'm sure it does, I just don't know how.)
[ANN] indicates that the post is an announcement. Oracle transferred ownership
[ANN] is an abbreviation of ANNouncement and has been used on newsgroups and
mailing lists for many years. (It is not specific to OOo in any way.)
Evidently, the convention is not so widely known as the poster thought.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Richard Detwiler
On 09/02/2011 10:03 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Please note that, as part of the overall migration to Apache, this
list will be closed. Based on feedback received, including from
participants on this list, we've decided to create a users list at the
Apache OpenOffice.org project to serve as a
On 2011-09-02 1:00 PM NoOp wrote:
Is that list setup for gmane.org?
Not yet. I asked on gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel . During the discussion with Rob Weir
he asked if it was possible for me to request Gmane including the list. I deferred since there
hadn't been a discussion on how it
On 09/02/2011 12:59 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-02 1:00 PM NoOp wrote:
Is that list setup for gmane.org?
Not yet. I asked on gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel . During the
discussion with Rob Weir
he asked if it was possible for me to request Gmane including the list. I
The ooo-us...@openoffice.org was just activated yesterday.
We need to add it to a number of places where we enumerate the
available lists.
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands
Oops, sorry. I meant ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org in the text above.
(You'll see that we say things like ooo-users@i.a.o a great deal when
giving list names on the Apache lists.)
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to
It would be better if you had one of the Apache PPMC do it (i.e., any
of the committers). While CTR (commit then review) is the lazy
consensus deal, that suggestion was a bit off-hand, since it is a
committer guideline, not general permission to the world.
What you can do on the list is suggest
[To the list this time]
It would be better to have someone from the PPMC (i.e., one of the
committers do it), so we learn how and also are identified as someone
who is accountable to the project if any kind of registration is
required.
The CTR (Commit Then Review) is a practice that works where
On 2011-09-02 3:14 PM wrote:
It would be better if you had one of the Apache PPMC do it (i.e., any
of the committers). While CTR (commit then review) is the lazy
consensus deal, that suggestion was a bit off-hand, since it is a
committer guideline, not general permission to the world.
I
On 09/02/2011 02:24 PM, dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
[To the list this time]
It would be better to have someone from the PPMC (i.e., one of the
committers do it), so we learn how and also are identified as someone
who is accountable to the project if any kind of registration is
required.
A post by Larry Gusaas. He has already replied to one or another of the posts
that had this text.
I was using the archive browser form and must have screwed up the reply
somehow. (I also posted the same message essentially twice because I didn't
think I'd sent the first to the list. Sorry,
On 09/02/2011 02:39 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-02 3:14 PM wrote:
It would be better if you had one of the Apache PPMC do it (i.e., any
of the committers). While CTR (commit then review) is the lazy
consensus deal, that suggestion was a bit off-hand, since it is a
committer
Sorry about the confusion. It was just advice. No need to change what you are
doing. When the time is up and you do it yourself, please report to ooo-dev
that you have done so along with any additional information you think we might
need about it.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From:
On 09/02/2011 03:31 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
A post by Larry Gusaas. He has already replied to one or another of
the posts that had this text.
No such thread on this list. Perhaps you are referring to the ooo-dev
thread:
[ANN] This list is migrating to
ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org
On 2011-09-02 4:33 PM NoOp wrote:
Oh... you guys must be referring to this thread over on the ooo-dev list:
Subject: [ANN] This list is migrating to
ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org
:-)
Actually, according to the in reply to header, Dennis is replying to the post I made in reply
to you before
On 09/02/2011 03:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 09/02/2011 02:39 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-02 3:14 PM wrote:
It would be better if you had one of the Apache PPMC do it (i.e., any
of the committers). While CTR (commit then review) is the lazy
consensus deal, that suggestion was a bit
Noop,
Sorry, the reply form on the archive does not setup a quotation that can be
used, or else I missed it.
I don't even think I can see the message being replied to once I am using the
form. Of course, the archive shows indented threading, except where the
message you questioned went
On 09/02/2011 01:27 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 09/02/2011 12:59 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-09-02 1:00 PM NoOp wrote:
Is that list setup for gmane.org?
Not yet. I asked on gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel . During the
discussion with Rob Weir
he asked if it was possible for me to request
On 2011-09-02 6:16 PM NoOp wrote:
I wonder if the OP (Rob Weir) will reply to my questions, or if he
simply intends to be a 'hit run' poster (cross-poster) to this list...
After all, posting such an annoucement on this list (and cross-posting
t-...@incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-09-02 6:16 PM NoOp wrote:
I wonder if the OP (Rob Weir) will reply to my questions, or if he
simply intends to be a 'hit run' poster (cross-poster) to this list...
After all, posting such an annoucement on
On 2011-09-02 6:49 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Larry, if you wanted to be useful you might have mentioned to NoOpthat
we have been discussing enabling Gmane for
ooo-users.incubator.apache.org on the ooo-dev list, and that you
yourself have volunteered to set that up in a few days.
If you had read this
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-09-02 6:49 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Larry, if you wanted to be useful you might have mentioned to NoOpthat
we have been discussing enabling Gmane for
ooo-users.incubator.apache.org on the ooo-dev list, and that you
On 09/02/2011 05:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-09-02 6:16 PM NoOp wrote:
I wonder if the OP (Rob Weir) will reply to my questions, or if he
simply intends to be a 'hit run' poster (cross-poster) to this list...
On 09/02/2011 06:19 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-09-02 6:49 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Larry, if you wanted to be useful you might have mentioned to NoOpthat
we have been discussing enabling Gmane for
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:25 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snipsnipsnip
Actually /you/ *need* to post information in *this* list so that the
users of this list aren't left in the dark. You can't just 'hit run'
on this list and close it down without *first* giving the users of
*this*
On 09/02/2011 06:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:25 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snipsnipsnip
Actually /you/ *need* to post information in *this* list so that the
users of this list aren't left in the dark. You can't just 'hit run'
on this list and close it down
43 matches
Mail list logo
