+services
but it does not seem to have been updated since 2016 (!).
Thanks for any leads,
Boris
--
Boris Goldowsky
Director of Technology
CAST, Inc. www.cast.org<http://www.cast.org>
What is the current best practice for allowing users to sign in to a Wicket
application using an OAuth2 provider (eg Google account, Twitter, Canvas, etc).
* Is Apache Shiro a possibility? Looks like it’s got some Wicket
integration, but OAuth2 is listed as “coming”.
* PicketLink?
*
What’s the best practice for a list (built in this case with a RefreshingView)
that has a header, which should be hidden if the list is empty?
The most obvious would be to wrap around the whole thing,
but the RefreshingView is still considered visible even when empty, so that
doesn’t work by i
gt; https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Boris Goldowsky
> wrote:
>
>> I’m not sure if there is a wicket-y way to do this.
>>
>> In the environment where I’m deploying my wicket app (google cloud +
I’m not sure if there is a wicket-y way to do this.
In the environment where I’m deploying my wicket app (google cloud + kubernetes
+ docker + tomcat), a request that came in to the load balancer under insecure
http is forwarded to wicket, and identified by the request containing an
“x-forwarde
ub.com/apache/wicket/blob/b24decd2f60983c11e75e5f2c34d0c6a93b56426/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/res/js/wicket-ajax-jquery.js#L614
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Boris Goldow
Sven, do you expect your fix for this to get into the next point release of
Wicket 7, or will it only be in Wicket 8?
Just trying to determine if I need to build a work-around or if I can wait for
an official fix.
Thanks!
Boris
On 4/25/17, 9:07 PM, "Boris Goldowsky" wrote:
Is there any way to use a method that returns a promise as the onBefore of an
IAxaxCallListener? I don’t want the ajax operation to move forward until the
promise resolves. Due to the nature of promises in Javascript, there doesn’t
seem to be a way to simply wait for it.
Boris
On 25.04.2017 15:32, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
> I think Sven is right.
> Debugging through, it appears to be here in ResourceAggregator:
>
> private void recordHeaderItem(HeaderItem item, Set depsDone)
> {
> rende
.
Sven
On 24.04.2017 23:41, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Boris Goldowsky
>> wrote:
>>
>>
I have a situation like this:
public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
…
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(resRef, pageParameters1,
“id1”));
response.render(JavaScriptHeaderItem.forReference(resRef, pageParameters2,
“id2”));
}
where same ResourceReference i
e:
Hi,
What exactly do you need to do ?
To test your application against Wicket 7.6.0-SNAPSHOT ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Boris Goldowsky
wrote:
> Has anyone impleme
Has anyone implemented snapshot testing for a wicket app or have suggestions on
how it might be done?
Boris
(yes, I know there are different schools of thought on whether snapshot testing
is a good idea or not)
Is there any way to create an annotation that would mark a field’s value as
something that ought to be detached? That is, instead of:
private IModel userModel;
@Override
public void onDetach() {
super.onDetach();
You might also try “QuickView” : https://github.com/vineetsemwal/quickview
This has worked well for us for situations where we are appending items to a
repeater.
Boris
On 7/11/16, 10:59 AM, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
Hi,
The article is
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/repainting-only-newly-c
OK, thanks. From the release notes it sounds like 2.2.3 at least should be
safe to use?
Boris
On 7/7/16, 1:38 PM, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
Hi,
Yes, there are known problems.
It is not recommended to upgrade yet!
On Jul 7, 2016 8:25 PM, "Boris Goldowsky" wrote:
>
Are there any problems with replacing the default jQuery reference in Wicket
7.3 (jQuery 1.12.3) with the latest (jQuery 3.0.0)? Have others tried this
configuration?
Thanks
Boris
I¹m thinking it would be handy to automate testing of the simplest of
validity & accessibility requirements eg, checking that every
element has an alt attribute, and every form input has a label.
Eventually maybe taking this up a notch and connecting with existing HTML
validation and a11y-checki
If I¹m understanding you correctly, wouldn¹t it be sufficient to code this
as
a simple AjaxLink, which responds with a regular AJAX
update when the link is disabled, or uses setResponsePage when it¹s
enabled?
Boris
On 1/7/15, 9:15 PM, "Joachim Schrod" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have a class of links wh
On 12/12/14, 11:22 AM, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Boris Goldowsky
>wrote:
>
>> Ah, yes that works. I can now reference my resources too.
>>
>> Now, sorry to be a pain about this, but I would like to get it
nsulting
>https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Boris Goldowsky
>wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this. I’m trying replacing the mapper with an extension of
>> AbstractResource and an extension of ResourceReference, as suggested in
>> that post, and
It describes the idea.
>
>Martin Grigorov
>Wicket Training and Consulting
>https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Boris Goldowsky
>wrote:
>
>> The mapper maps a url path to a filesystem directory, so we can mount,
>> say, /static/* to a di
The issue seems to be that, if the mod_pagespeed Javascript rewriting
rules are enabled, then the Wicket ajax code tries to re-load JS libraries
like jQuery. This is not only unnecessary, it breaks things.
Specifically ‹ without mod_pagespeed, or with the rewrite_javascript rules
disabled, Wicket
Is anyone using google’s mod_pagespeed with Wicket? I would be interested in
comparing notes.
As a test, we’ve installed mod_pagespeed (default configuration) on an Apache
web server that is a proxy in front of the Tomcat instance which runs Wicket,
and are seeing some somewhat mysterious AJA
ctResource where
>you have much better control on the response headers.
>
>
>Martin Grigorov
>Wicket Training and Consulting
>https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
>On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Boris Goldowsky
>wrote:
>
>> I have a request mapper that extends
I have a request mapper that extends AbstractMapper, and returns a
ResourceStreamRequestHandler from mapRequest().
The resource is being send with a Cache-Control: private header, which is
unfortunate for caching in this case; we want the resources to be publicly
cacheable.
How can I set the c
I would recommend against using .object inside a PropertyModel, at least
if your application makes use of detachable models. When a component uses
the property model in your example,
new PropertyModel(MyPage.this, "list.object[1].anyProperty")
The model returned by MyPage.getList() will be
Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Boris Goldowsky
>wrote:
>
>> How would you set things up to have the best of both worlds with a
>> QuickView? I need to have
>> (a) a button like an AjaxItemsNavigator that adds additional elements to
>> the QuickView without repain
How would you set things up to have the best of both worlds with a QuickView?
I need to have
(a) a button like an AjaxItemsNavigator that adds additional elements to the
QuickView without repainting the entire view, AND
(b) some AJAX operations that change the entire content of the QuickView –
Thank you all for your replies, very helpful!
Sven Meier mailto:s...@meiers.net>> wrote:
>detachable models should never use getObject() in their implementation of
>equals()?
generally this is a good advice: there are several places in Wicket checking
for model equality (e.g. ReuseIfModelsEqua
I’ve started using CheckingObjectOutputStream to test for models of database
objects that are not properly detached, and find it very useful.
However I just diagnosed (after many hours of frustration) that it can also
cause problems rather than solve them. CheckingObjectOutputStream causes the
4 at 5:48 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is not a function? If I look at the source code I see something like
>>
>> submitMultipartForm = function(context) {
>>
>> },
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On
has a working example that would be
really helpful.
Boris
On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
> Maybe Wicket.Ajax.Call.subitMultipartForm?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to migrate an a
I’m attempting to migrate an auto-saving behavior from wicket 1.5 to wicket 6.
In wicket 1.5 it worked by doing something like this every 30 seconds to loop
through auto-save-enabled forms on the page and submit them:
$("form.ajaxAutoSave").each(function() {
var form = $(this);
wicketSub
; Can you debug what's happening there in your case?
>
> Sven
>
> On 12/20/2013 01:53 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
>> I’m trying to use wicket-auth-roles (in Wicket 1.5.9) to make a component
>> that is enabled only for logged-in users. In my case if you’re not logged
&g
Dec 20, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
> AnnotationsRoleAuthorizationStrategy#check() looks good to me.
>
> Can you debug what's happening there in your case?
>
> Sven
>
> On 12/20/2013 01:53 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
>> I’m trying to use wicket-auth-roles
I’m trying to use wicket-auth-roles (in Wicket 1.5.9) to make a component that
is enabled only for logged-in users. In my case if you’re not logged in, you
have only a role called GUEST. If you are logged in you have a role called
STUDENT (and also GUEST, since everything guests can do, stude
n site in Wakefield, MA a day or two a week, but we will certainly consider
other options as well.
Please contact me directly by email if you are interested -
Boris Goldowsky
Director of Technology
CAST, Inc.
-
To unsubscrib
older where the
> current .html is.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
>
>> Hi all -
>>
>> Trying to upgrade a number of wicket applications from 1.4 to wicket 1.5,
>> and then once that's working, to 6.x.
>>
>>
Hi all -
Trying to upgrade a number of wicket applications from 1.4 to wicket 1.5, and
then once that's working, to 6.x.
One thing we want to handle is having any reference in the markup such as be able to find that image in a filesystem directory
known to the application. There are also js
Is wicketstuff-rome still a usable package with recent Wicket versions, or does
anyone have an alternative simple way to display an ATOM or RSS feed on a
wicket page?
Thanks!
Boris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...
Our educational R&D non-profit is looking to hire a programmer who has a
real interest in working to improve education. You'd have to be in
commuting distance of Wakefield, MA (just north of Boston). The job
will involve lots of building experimental web apps using Wicket.
Please see
htt
Thanks for the suggestion! StatelessAjaxFallbackLink is very nearly
magical. It in fact almost works, but unfortunately seems incompatible
with most UrlCodingStrategies. It generates some spurious URLs with the
wrong number of ..'s if the page has a subdirectory or two in the URL.
Back to t
I have a wicket website that stores some user choices around how a page is
displayed in the Session - simple, non-critical information. It also uses Ajax
to do things like bring up a zoomed-in version of an image.
The problem is when sessions expire after an hour or so, trying to zoom an
image
IDs are needed for e.g. AJAX functionality. The default Wicket
implementation of markup IDs will create them smartly, never creating
duplicate ids even in the case of multiple instances of panels,
repeaters, etc.
As I understand Wicket best practice, it is never to call setMarkupId()
at all,
As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the
wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7. wicketstuff-core's
version number is now 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT, and the idea is that people can
test it, and barring any major problems it can be released as a stable
version 1.4.7 .
N
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 11:38
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Wicketstuff versioning
2010-03-23 11:24 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta:
I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay crea
I may be wrong, but wouldn't it make sense to delay creating a 1.4.x
branch until/unless someone actually wants to commit some code that
would be different for 1.4.x and 1.5-SNAPSHOT? Once we branch, we have
to start committing every bug fix to two different versions, right?
If we're lucky, eve
POST data and parse it. So perhaps TinyMCE is doing this in a
non-standard way?
Bng
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
there is no parameter name that it sends it under? the {} string has
to be assigned to something
-igor
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
I'm try
I'm trying to make the spellcheck part of the wicketstuff tinymce module
work. I think the protocol used by the spellchecking plugin may have
changed since this module was written.
TinyMCE sends a POST request to the server; the post data looks
something like this (this is JSON format, right?
Do you mean you have HelloPanel with one markup, and HelloMyDearFriends
with the same functionality but different markup?
In that case define a trivial class HelloMyDearFriends.java extending
HelloPanel but not changing the function. Drop in your
HelloMyDearFriends.html next to it, and you sh
nino martinez wael wrote:
I'll be happy to join in Boris.
That would be awesome, thanks Nino.
I'm thinking the first thing would be to bump the wicket dependency to
v1.4.7 and do a maven release of the current state of wicketstuff-core
as version 1.4.7. Make sense? Is that something you
Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on
WicketStuff. I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture
and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from
the community.
I'd volunteer to put a bit of time into this, but I don't have time to
be sol
problem with WicketStuff.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of SVN.
Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to
Great. Can someone with write access to the repository do this? Or if
i can do it via my SVN credentials, tell me how.
Thanks!
Bng
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
sure
-igor
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
The TinyMCE package depends on the Jazzy spell checker, which
The TinyMCE package depends on the Jazzy spell checker, which doesn't
seem to be in any public maven repository. Would it be reasonable to
put that jar into the wicketstuff repository?
The latest version appears to be the one at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jazzy/files/
Bng
--
The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of SVN.
Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to keep in sync with Wicket?
Bng
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional comm
ugs.
however, i dont think the project is maintained so most likely no one
will pay attention to the jira entry.
if you would like to take over the maintenance we can grant you svn access.
-igor
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
Just curious, is the TinyMCE wicketstuff pr
I once tested when Tomcat sessions actually get expired, and it can be
very much longer than the given session-timeout value. Probably if
there was active traffic the session would be recycled sooner, but I
think if you need accurate timing then you have to implement something
yourself rather
Just curious, is the TinyMCE wicketstuff project abandoned, or are there
plans to update it?
It's using a version of TinyMCE from 2008.
If we updated it, is there someone that we should send patches to?
Boris
-
To unsubscribe
Sorry, please ignore my recent message. I found my mistake, and it had
nothing to do with Wicket. The image resources in question do get
properly refreshed.
Boris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
Hi,
I have some pages that reference images that are in files external to
the web application and I am serving the images via SharedResources like
so:
public class ExternalImageResource extends WebResource {
...
public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
return new FileResourc
62 matches
Mail list logo
