Hi,
I have a little problem in getting a CheckGroup to work... The setup is as
follows:
the page has a Form with a CheckGroup that contains a ListView where each list
item
adds a Check component - giving me a bulk select mechanism. Now, everything
works
great if the form is submitted
.
However, I still wonder if that is the way to go or just weird hack which
solves the
problem more or less by coincidence.
Any help would be appreciated.
J.
On 10.06.2012 12:21, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem in getting a CheckGroup to work... The setup is as
follows:
the page has
.
However, I still wonder if that is the way to go or just weird hack which
solves the
problem more or less by coincidence.
Any help would be appreciated.
J.
On 10.06.2012 12:21, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem in getting a CheckGroup to work... The setup is as
follows
or less by coincidence.
Any help would be appreciated.
J.
On 10.06.2012 12:21, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem in getting a CheckGroup to work... The setup is as
follows:
the page has a Form with a CheckGroup that contains a ListView where each list
item
adds a Check component
response) {
response.renderOnDomReadyJavaScript(
$('# + getMarkupId() + .ttr').tipTip({defaultPosition:
'right'}););
}
}
-Tom
On 04.06.2012, 19:21 Jürgen Lind wrote:
[…]
wicket:script
$(document).ready(function() {
$(#markupId .ttr
) {
response.renderOnDomReadyJavaScript(
$('# + getMarkupId() + .ttr').tipTip({defaultPosition:
'right'}););
}
}
-Tom
On 04.06.2012, 19:21 Jürgen Lind wrote:
[…]
wicket:script
$(document).ready(function() {
$(#markupId .ttr).tipTip
(
$('# + getMarkupId() +
.ttr').tipTip({defaultPosition:
'right'}););
}
}
-Tom
On 04.06.2012, 19:21 Jürgen Lind wrote:
[…]
wicket:script
$(document).ready(function() {
$(#markupId .ttr).tipTip({defaultPosition: right});
});
/wicket:script
What do you mean by large? Many users or many dialogs/components? I have
developed
three more or less (which means that a new page was only needed when basically
the entire
structure changed - which occured seldomly) single page apps with wicket and I
have not
run into real problems. But as
overriding that method could achieve the intended behavior...
J.
On 09.05.2012 16:36, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Ok, I stripped down everything to a very basic setup that should work according
to Martins
suggestions and the wicket documentation. Any ideas why
canCallListenerInterface is never called
On 09.05.2012 14:29, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks for the hint, unfortunatly, it does not work :-( I've been looking
through the relevant
code and the approach seems right, however at some point, the returned
values seem to be ignored
and the link is still disabled (i.e. the onclick-handler
Hi,
I have a little problem in my application and maybe someone has an idea how to
solve it:
I have a complex form that is structured using a custom collapsible AJAX-panel
to show/hide
certain parts of the form. Now, if a user does not have the write permission
for the form, the
form is
Hi Martin,
that was my initial approach. However, I would like the collapsible panels to
keep their
state between form submits, therefore I would need some sort of Javascript
state management
or I would simply use ajax links for that purpose. Which is what I would
prefer... A later
post
Hi Martin,
thanks for the hint, unfortunatly, it does not work :-( I've been looking
through the relevant
code and the approach seems right, however at some point, the returned values
seem to be ignored
and the link is still disabled (i.e. the onclick-handler is not rendered)... I
will have
) {
System.out.println(clicked...);
}
};
container.add(link);
this.add(container);
}
}
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
html
div wicket:id=container
div wicket:id=linkClick me!/div
/div
/html
On 09.05.2012 14:29, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks for the hint, unfortunatly
Hi,
in case like this where I would like to reuse a custom component in different
contexts, I
usually make the component abstract and have the using components implement an
abstract method such as getService. This way, I can pass in different beans
as needed...
Maybe that helps,
Jürgen
On
Hi,
I'm a bit confused with stateless pages and maybe somebody can shed light on
this...
I have a (currently) empty mounted WebPage that is later supposed to serve as a
health-check page and will thus be called frequently. Now, if a do a simple wget
with the page URL, my RequestCycleListener
,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke
Hi,
I have difficulties in using the setResponsePage in ajax call as Wicket seems
to direct the
call to a relative URL. As a result, the request is made to the root context an
that gives me
a 404.
The scenario is as follows: I have a login form and would like to provide user
feedback on
...@wicket.apache.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB
-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax
Hi,
I am looking for ideas on how to implement a context-aware
AuthorizationStrategy.
This means that I need a way to decided whether a certain self-written
component can
be instantiated in a particular context or not. For example, the filter
component
may be show to a user with a certain
Hi,
I am currently evaluating my options for (semi) pro-active messages to the
user. The first
idea was to use an AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior to poll for new messages for
the user. Since
this might put quite some unnecessary load on the server, I was thinking about
using the
current request
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4
-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching
Hi,
I need a way to decide wether a certain page can be opend based on the URL it
was called with. Therefore, I need
access to the current request in the 'isInstantiationAuthorized' method of
IAuthorizationStrategy. Is there a way to
get access to the current request there?
Thanks,
J.
-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH
Hi,
I've run into a very odd situation and I have no idea, how to find out what is
going on... The situation is as follows:
1. I have a base page that contains some markup and components.
2. I have a second page, that extends the base page but does not add
any markup or components, i.e the
Hi Christoph, maybe I was a bit too quick in assuming that Jrebel was the
culprit...
I went back to 1.5.3 an since then, the problem has disappeared. Let's hope it
stays
that way... Thank you again for the hint.
J.
On 04.03.2012 11:46, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Thanks for the hint, but I do
, Jürgen Lindjuergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Hi Christoph, maybe I was a bit too quick in assuming that Jrebel was the
culprit...
I went back to 1.5.3 an since then, the problem has disappeared. Let's hope
it stays
that way... Thank you again for the hint.
J.
On 04.03.2012 11:46, Jürgen Lind wrote
if somebody else has a similar problem.
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer
wrote:
Hi,
do you use 1.5.4 with package resources? There's a bug that causes
locked resources:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4359
Until 1.5.5 is released you can use 1.5.3, which is not affected by this
bug.
Christoph
On 04.03.2012 10:29, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I was just
a full build because of a
locked resource. I am also in contact with the Jrebel guys, I just wanted
to know if somebody else has a similar problem.
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching
);
this.add(popupHolder);
}
I have no idea what could cause the problem, the component ordering seems to be
ok from
my point of view and, as I said before, the code works just fine in 1.4.12.
Cheers,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4
Ok, I am going to answer myself on that one: changing
this.add(popupHolder);
to
this.addToBorder(popupHolder);
dis it. I had read the migration guide and the Javadoc several times but just
did not understand it
(correctly)...
J.
On 24.02.2012 14:00, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I've just begun
, so I added
getResourceSettings().setCachingStrategy(NoOpResourceCachingStrategy.INSTANCE);
to my application's init method. Unfortunately, that did not work either. Any
suggestions how to
get around this problem?
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
method. Unfortunately, that did not work either.
Any suggestions how to
get around this problem?
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und
a function that gets called when wicket creates a new
element in the DOM:
Wicket.Event.subscribe('/dom/**node/added', function(element) {
// do stuff
});
You can also use the '/dom/node/removing' channel.
Hope this helps.
Christoph
Jürgen Lind (2012-02-18 16:55):
Hi,
I
Jürgen Lind (2012-02-18 16:55):
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any kind of best practice to add specific
javascript
to a component. I often have the case, where a piece of javascript needs
to run
when the component is rendered as part of full-page request, and then
subsequently
as part of a self
of the page.
J.
On 19.02.2012 13:02, Christoph Leiter wrote:
On 18.02.2012 17:46, Jürgen Lind wrote:
thank you for your reply, I did not know that such a method exists (does
it for 1.4
or is this already Wicket 1.5). An secondly: are these handlers fired on
a ajax
update of an existing DOM Element
. :) The
first argument of the event handler is the added element. You can simply
use it as is or pass it to $() to do jQuery magic just for the relevant
part.
Christoph
On 19.02.2012 13:18, Jürgen Lind wrote:
Christoph,
I have use yout approach (jQuery + css-class) for some time now as well.
However
');
});
});
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke, Inge
for Wicket 1.4?
Doubful, the event system was added in 1.5
- Tor Iver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Jürgen Lind
of
my
subclassed LabelTree component.
Any suggestions on how to instrument my application without building a
custom wicket
package?
Kind Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching
or as part of an Ajax-Request triggered
by another component.
I would like to have one place where I can put the Javascript and be shure, it
is
run every time...
Cheers,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
', function(element) {
// do stuff
});
You can also use the '/dom/node/removing' channel.
Hope this helps.
Christoph
Jürgen Lind (2012-02-18 16:55):
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any kind of best practice to add specific
javascript
to a component. I often have the case, where a piece
Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
Geschäftsführer: Klaus Eberhardt, Mark Goerke
these numbers. The
last
point I was able to measure was between onBeforeRender and onAfterRender of
my
subclassed LabelTree component.
Any suggestions on how to instrument my application without building a
custom wicket
package?
Kind Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49
:20 PM, Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
One more thing: just as a rule of thumb, what would be a reasonable
amount of data that gets added to the session for a single request?
20k? 100k?
Regards,
J.
Michael Sparer wrote:
I took a cursory glance over your code and saw
item.add(new
(),
(int)Bytes.megabytes(100).bytes(), 50);
}
(10MB for one pagemap and 100MB for a complete session over multiply
pagemaps)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:44, Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Probably I was a bit unclear, I was talking about the serialized session
on disk. Does
until the default 10MB i already said that.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:58, Jürgen Lind juergen.l...@iteratec.de wrote:
Thank you for pointing me to the means to tune the DiskPagestore size.
The only question that remains is whether it is normal that it keeps
growing
and by what extend.
J
.
Is this the behavior that I would expect from the DataView or am I making
some mistake here?
Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und
);
}
@Override
protected void onDetach() {
super.onDetach();
}
}
Michael Sparer wrote:
the objects shouldn't be serialized into the session if you're using
loadabledetachable models, please show us some code
regards,
Michael
Jürgen Lind-2 wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on how
,
Michael
Jürgen Lind-2 wrote:
After some twiddling I found that the PagingNavigator seems to be the
culprit.
If I leave it out, the session grows only moderately, when I put it in,
the
domain objects end up in the session... Anyway here is the code:
public class AuftragUebersicht extends
nonserializable
exceptions until they don't ocurr anymore.
hope that helps a bit - and thanks for beating leverkusen in 2000 ;-)
regards,
Michael
Jürgen Lind-2 wrote:
After some twiddling I found that the PagingNavigator seems to be the
culprit.
If I leave it out, the session grows only moderately
was invoked before loading the underlying list.
Can someone spot my mistake?
Thanks,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der
that is solved using a custom ItemModel
does not even occur. Or does that code prevent wicket from effectively
detaching model objects and should thus be avoided? What would be the
best practice here?
J.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have been
onclick()
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
your link works on the object and not on the model, instead
add(new link(delete, item.getmodel()) { onclick() {
delete(getmodelobject()); }});
Thank you for your quick reply.
Well
problem with your approach: you keep
the object reference which means the object is serialized instead of
being retrieved through a loadable detachable model.
-igor
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Still, one questions remains
correct? And how would I deal with a requirement as described above?
Cheers,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH
list )
query to retrieve the current window of data.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I a currently a bit stuck in dealing with a PageableListView and a
detachable
model. I have build my own model that wraps a list of search results that
should
of the listview can then retrieve
the subset of this list (based on the current page and number of items
needed) and do a select from foo where id in ( subset of id list )
query to retrieve the current window of data.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
is unaware of where or how its list is
built.
for database stuff i prefer using dataview, it has database semantics
more closely built into it.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am still a bit confused about one thing in the remark below: how can
that library within
the wicket:head section.
Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB 113 519
else will complain :)
maybe they add a javascript library via wickethead and have a
contributor spitting out some dynamic javascript.
point is its a bad idea to depend on the ordering, whichever way it
currently is.
-igor
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
the home page. How can I avoid this
behavior?
Kind Regards,
Jürgen
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München
by wicket. Any clues?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
use a stateless form
-igor
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a little annoyance in conjunction with session creation that I
have
been unable to fix until now:
1. My pages are guarded using
:43 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried using a stateless form for the Login page, but it seems that a new
session is created before the page is even called. I inserted a stacktrack
output in the constructor of my Wicket-Session (which happens to be s
subclass
.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
thanks for your support. Still I am a bit confused about the two types
of sessions we are dealing with: as far as I understood, there is a wicket
session that is stored within the http session of the container. Now
. Can someone help
me and point me to a solution for this problem?
Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH
Thx,
J.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
label.add(new AttributeModifier(class, true, new Model() { public
Object getObject() { return formcomponent.isValid() ? : error;
}});
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for the solution for a quite common
forget to call setRenderBodyOnly(true) on the label.
Regards,
Erik.
Jürgen Lind wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is some way to rewrite the component markup
before
it is rendered. My setting is as follows:
1. I have a component markup file like this
wicket:panel
script type=text
that has been given to the
component when the component was constructed.
Is there any way to achieve this?
Regards,
J.
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
.
/Gwyn
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Jürgen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I am not using quickstart for my
test application. So which part of the application is best to be included
in the ticket?
J.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
seems like a bug. please
not so apparent) that I have been
missing?
Kind regards,
Jürgen
--
Dr. Jürgen Lind
iteratec GmbHFon: +49 (0)89 614551-44
Inselkammerstrasse 4 Fax: +49 (0)89 614551-10
82008 Unterhaching Web: www.iteratec.de
Sitz und Registergericht der iteratec GmbH: München HRB
75 matches
Mail list logo
