@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
This all hints at why terminology IS very important. If a term can
make your friend get, when another term cant, there is something
important there.
Last night I heard a rally
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo yo yo, join me, drop the P, add a D, I wanna make oddcasts.
But do we call them spatcasts, spatucasts, spatulacasts, or
spatulablogs, or spatulatory delight? Questions, questions!
Well, my personal
On 9/17/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look, it's all well and good to *discuss* spatulas, but without a
spatulacast to back it up, the words are meaningless...
http://tinkernet.org/2005/09/16/spatulacasting/
Pete
How do you have a conversation about spatulacasting without
Look, you guys. Are we spatulacasting our spatulablogging? I know why I got into this...http://www.etherworks.ca/2005_09_01_blogarchive.htmlOn 17-Sep-05, at 4:40 AM, Adam Quirk wrote: On 9/17/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Look, it's all well and good to *discuss* spatulas, but
My grandmother had casters on her couch so she could move it around
more easily.
She was one of the first vouchcasters... ;-)
On Sep 16, 2005, at 11:13 AM, Markus Sandy wrote:
Am I the only rock and roller old enough to remember when casters
referred to a particular bunch of groupies that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My grandmother had casters on her couch so she could move it around
more easily.
She was one of the first vouchcasters... ;-)
On Sep 16, 2005, at 11:13 AM, Markus Sandy wrote:
Am I the only rock and roller
: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
This all hints at why terminology IS very important. If a term can
make your friend get, when another term cant, there is something
important there.
Last night I heard a rally of women speaking out against John
Roberts. Because he is against abortion, they were saying he
, September 16, 2005 10:47 AMSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
This all hints at why terminology IS very important. If a term canmake your friend get, when another term cant, there is somethingimportant there.Last night I heard a rally of women speaking out against John
Roberts
channelcast.
:-)
-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog
I think it's important to separate actual technology from content and
interaction.
Blogs, podcasts, and videoblogs triumph on the technology of subscription
delivery: RSS et
al. Audio and video (and any other media file for that matter) can be
automatically
downloaded via this technology.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
it sucks. sorry eric. it sucks. i dont like it for audio, i certainly dont
like it for video. an iPod and any mobile device is only one-part of the big
scheme of things anyways.
i wont dare suggest a new word
I don't mean to sound TOO snarky, but should we just call off any and all
efforts to do
anything with portable video, including but not limited to phones, PSPs, and
other
disconnected devices?
It sounds like we're trying to force people-made media into a very very tiny
box. Blog-
only, or no
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:01 AM, Eric Rice wrote:
I don't mean to sound TOO snarky, but should we just call off any
and all efforts to do
anything with portable video, including but not limited to phones,
PSPs, and other
disconnected devices?
No, we shouldnt. Who was saying that we
So when we do Meet the Vloggers I am supposed to keep a running list
of all the terms used to discribe what we do? Am I also supposed to
explain the generation of the terms? Folks would be rubbing their hair
out.
I can't at this time create a video with an ipod. I can't edit or
change anything
andrew michael baron wrote:
# Video podcasting is different than videoblogging. Podcasting does
not have the blog part. Some podcasters attempt to work this avenue,
but podcasting as a medium generally ignores metadata, hyperlinks,
and general blog mentality. Podcasters will try and
Bill Streeter wrote:
I agree with Eric, use what works.
Okay, I mentioned this a while back. I'm not a fan of the word blog.
It's really not a pleasant sounding word. Believe it or not a lot
of civilians I run into still have no clue what a blog is. So
when you start throwing terms like
Am I the only rock and roller old enough to remember when "casters"
referred to a particular bunch of groupies that used to be famous for
making plaster casts of various rock stars' private parts?
We need a better name. Besides, we're not really casting anyway (this
is not a push
On 9/16/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need a better name. Besides, we're not really casting anyway (this
is not a push technology, except possibly for the pings and trackbacks).
Though you may have an argument here, it has a few holes.
Today, we have new technology... we are
h, good point sull. but you know me, I'm thinking p2p here and in
that case it's not just a simple 1 to many (server-client) relationship
between a content producer and their audience
in p2p land, there is a more viral distribution mechanism at play: I
pull Josh Leo's feed and see
I've actually run into snags explaining to people that they
can subscribe to my video blog. More often than not people
ask, how much does it cost? So even the term subscription can be
problematic--as many people associate the word subscription to
some kind of pay for play system like magazine
Snarky.. OK I give up. I no longer know my own identity. We appear to
be in the midst of a semantic war over what this/these new medium/
media is/are. I guess we need an Apple Video iPod for temporary
validation of the Video Podcast term. But remember when there used to
be a Photo iPod? Now
EnclosureCast is a pun. Dont take that seriously.
see:
http://search.yahoo.com/mrss
see:
http://www.advogato.org/article/853.html
maybe try:
Taylor Barcroft
New Media Publisher, Editor, Journalist, Blogger ; ^ )
;-)
On 9/16/05, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snarky.. OK I give up. I no
when talking to your potential audience etc who may not be in the know of the geekery, why not just call it Internet TV and Internet Radio? And you have a
Channel with Shows.
they can Tune In with a Free Subscription
Visit this Website and/or
Download this Software to get started.
You can
No its probably a hardware thing too. Processor in current iPods
probably hugely inadequate to decode mpeg4, let alone h264. Could be
other bottlenecks, but I dont know, eg display controller.
Video ipod will need more powerful processor, or extra chips that can
decode video and not use allt he
The only way I can get my non-geek friends to understand what videblogging is:"It's like podcasting. But with video."I hate it as much as the next, but at the end of the day I don't really care that much. Come to think of it, say the word "blog" five times and listen to how stupid it is. Or,
Debate? Discussion? Eh... whatever, it's a good conversation to
have, regardless. When I'm talking to other vloggers it's a settled
issue for me. I'll call it vlogging, vlog, or video blog. I guess
the terminology isn't an issue for me until I try to talk to someone
about it that is outside
I work with many, for the lack of a better term, 'normal' English
people. Many of them have been on the net for 5 or 6 years, but few
have ever connected to any of the sites, communities, cultures and
information streams that I do. Age range about 25-55 so not quite part
of the latest digital
Brett Gaylor wrote:
The only way I can get my non-geek friends to understand what
videblogging is:
It's like podcasting. But with video.
I hate it as much as the next, but at the end of the day I don't really
care that much. Come to think of it, say the word blog five times and
Spatula City, here I come!ispatulacast.pod.net , streamed in HD to your aggregator futurecaster open content directory-fier! Frickin A!For free!b - Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.etherworks.ca
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
Yes I demand a HDV version of spatula.
My detailed laboratory analysis on the issue reveals that the optimal
settings for encoding widescreen spatula video is as follows:
960x540 at no less than 1500kbits/sec.
People disagree over how many frames per second humans need of the
spatula in flight,
OK, sorry to railroad serious stuff, here, but I just have to point you all to the:Web Economy Bullshit Generatorhttp://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.htmlRemember: optimize dot-com nichesbOn 16-Sep-05, at 2:48 PM, Brett Gaylor wrote: Spatula City, here I come!ispatulacast.pod.net , streamed in HD to
960x540 at no less than 1500kbits/sec.Are you certain that this will meet Apple's SDK for iTunes 12.7 (code name: Marmot)?I have my doubts that H.268 will support this sort of redonculation.b - Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.etherworks.ca
SPONSORED LINKS
On 9/16/05, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to their shape, spatulas are prone to obvious interlacing
artefacts when in motion. Some of the finest minds this side of
sneezeston on knees are working on the optimum spatula deinterlacing
algorithm.
Unified heterogeneous algorithms
Steve Watkins wrote:
Yes I demand a HDV version of spatula.
My detailed laboratory analysis on the issue reveals that the optimal
settings for encoding widescreen spatula video is as follows:
960x540 at no less than 1500kbits/sec.
People disagree over how many frames per second humans
16, 2005 1:06
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Video
Podcasting? wtf :(
I've actually run into snags explaining to people that they
can "subscribe" to my video blog. More often than not people ask, "how
much does it cost?" So even the term subscription can be problematic--
Yo yo yo, join me, drop the P, add a D, I wanna make oddcasts. But do we call them spatcasts, spatucasts, spatulacasts, or spatulablogs, or spatulatory delight? Questions, questions!Well, my personal spatulablog (I've given up on my battle to just call them spatublogs...I accept that the
videoblog. Sign up for doesn't imply
something you pay for.
-
Original Message -
From:
Bill Streeter
To:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
Friday, September 16, 2005 1:06 PM
Subject:
[videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
I've
]
*To:* videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, September 16, 2005 1:06 PM
*Subject:* [videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
I've actually run into snags explaining to people that they
can subscribe to my video blog. More often than not people
ask, how much does it cost?
--
My name
Most people don't even know what a podcast is it's a toss up.
jad
madpod.com (podcast)
dummycast.com (video podcast :))
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/05/09/15/1821228.shtml?
tid=176tid=95tid=3
Will we be stuck
Heh, I lost this battle at Audioblog... (we're a democracy, not a benevolent
dictatorship.
heh)... 'Video podcast' drove me bonkers, I still use videoblog, and 'vlog' is
my slang for
those in familiar company.
While I argued that 'podcast' is technically understood to be audio, the point
of
On Sep 15, 2005, at 8:37 PM, Eric Rice wrote:
Heh, I lost this battle at Audioblog...
# Video podcasting is different than videoblogging. Podcasting does
not have the blog part. Some podcasters attempt to work this avenue,
but podcasting as a medium generally ignores metadata, hyperlinks,
this topic is like the cancer of this group... so funny. it comes and goes and eats away at us.
i've made so many posts about it. for my own pleasure, and because i am
drunk and bored, i will regurgitate for my virtual friends.
my main point has always been that we and all should stay clear
OK you convinced me. I am a Mediacaster. Transmitting for download
Audio, Video and PDFs. Thanks Michael.
--
Taylor Barcroft
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Mediacaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://FutureMedia.org
RSS
43 matches
Mail list logo
