Independent producers, the ones doing innovative things, creative things,
with their CONTENT, are being left behind in the billion dollar Youtube
new media revolution.
There are people doing very impressive, intelligent, timeless things. Many
of which, idealistically, have no ulterior motives
Echo what others have said re: AVG.
I also run Spywareblaster. It blocks tasteless cookies from ever getting in
your box, and alerts you to system changes, like if something wants to reset
your default browser page or change a registry value.
http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
After re-reading that it appears that I called Casey shit. I do not think
that Casey McKinnon is Shit. I think that Galacticast is Shit.
On 12/15/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Independent producers, the ones doing innovative things, creative things,
with their CONTENT, are being
Am not inspired by the concept in the least.
Pay $5 in order to maybe get $10? I don't think so.
Robin Hood works if Met Life is the sponsor. If Met Life is the sponsor,
then folks don't have to pay to enter.
Glenda the Good Witch would work as wish-granting icon, but she's
copyrighted.
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of andrew michael baron
Sent: 14 December 2006 22:39
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!
Apparently, not having your own ideas runs in the family. ;)
Andrew, you are
As to Network2's involvement in the personal media revolution
3rd paragraph of this http://www.evilvlog.com/?p=6256 deals with the
underlying animosity that is brought upon video portal sites, and says
exactly this for those that would rather not follow the link:
The thing about Network2 or
Den 15.12.2006 kl. 10:04 skrev Gary Short [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Like I said though, I don't want to pour oil on troubled waters, as I
think we
are all tired of hearing about it - just please, get over yourself will
you?
If you don't want to pour water on troubled water, you should refrain
If I were wronged, be it in business or personal affairs, and the culprit
gets off scott-free and is simultaneously raised upon the collective hands
of the community that I helped to build, I would feel it worth a fight to
get my story told.
On 12/15/06, Gary Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but there comes a point when everyone gets sick of it and it produces
exactly the opposite of the sympathy and support you're looking for.
And it doesn't reflect well on anybody's professionality to be airing these
grievances here.
On 12/15/06, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
How does it reflect upon justice?
http://yeastradio.podshow.com/?p=954
On 12/15/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but there comes a point when everyone gets sick of it and it
produces
exactly the opposite of the sympathy and support you're looking for.
And it doesn't
I have been reading the thousands of messages about Amanda Congdon on
ABC, so I thought maybe people would be interested in knowing that
video blogger and podcaster, Max Keiser of KarmabanqueRadio.com, has
made a film for international broadcaster, Al Jazeera English (AJE).
Here it is:
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Quirk
Sent: 15 December 2006 09:41
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!
If I were wronged, be it in business or personal affairs, and the culprit
gets off
If you don't want to pour water on troubled water, you should refrain from
writing e-mails as the one I'm quoting here.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
You are probably correct, but then again it’s just so frustrating that so much
energy is being wasted on this
Den 15.12.2006 kl. 11:08 skrev Gary Short [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You are probably correct, but then again it’s just so frustrating that
so much energy is being wasted on this feud. How much better would it be
if the same energy was being used to create something new and truly
innovative?
...Mefeedia is opt-in I think, but I am not sure about FireAnt, I
know that my feed was in there before I I registared in
fireant.maybe that has something to do with the 1 click
subscription button, I don't know, regardless, it doesn't bother
me
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
How can you seperate the two? You are calling her work shit, then
IMO you are calling her the same thing. And one more
thing Apoligies to anyone offended? That's a cop-out, you know you
will offend some people, the statement is meant to offend, because
you used strong words to invoke a
So, in sending out an email to each person we have on our site,
telling them what we're about, asking them to check and see if we've
represented them appropriately, asking them to call me or email if
there are questions or concerns, etc., that's not showing an interest
in establishing a
Actually, you can hate the work and like the creator of said work. You
dont hate your new puppy for taking a piss on the floor. You love your
puppy. You just dont like the behavior.
I see nothing wrong with criticism. Be it harsh or mean spirited.
Movie critics do it every day. If one is going to
As with any business, we'll work to create the appropriate
relationships to share revenue when that comes about. For now, it's
more about building awareness, driving attention to the work.
Has that caught on yet? The notion that what we're trying to do is
separate what YOU do from the average
Gary, whats the point of telling me Im getting on your nerves? You
are doing exactly what Andrew Congdon did and I have no problem
speaking up about it and defending myself.
I think I provided a well rounded argument for disucssion about the
cost of doing business when merging established
On Dec 15, 2006, at 6:30 AM, [chrisbrogan.com] wrote:
As with any business, we'll work to create the appropriate
relationships to share revenue when that comes about. For now, it's
more about building awareness, driving attention to the work.
I think that this often repeated statement has
On Dec 15, 2006, at 6:21 AM, [chrisbrogan.com] wrote:
If EVER you don't want to be featured on Network2, please let me know.
I have no problem with an easy opt-out. (Please email me or call me
directly, because I might miss that call on this very active list).
that's cheezy
opt-out is
Ooooh - must set alarm clock!
Jan
On 12/14/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all
a few of us were chatting about the various vlogging collaborations and
we thought let's have a video conference about it
so the topic is Videoblogging collaborations, looking back at 2006 and
As a mod asked everyone to stop posting on this thread (you must have missed
that) I'll not respond here, but if you wish to continue this discussion please
feel free to contact me off list.
Cheers,
Gary
http://www.garyshort.org/
http://www.carnoustiegolflinks.co.uk/vlog/
From:
aw - missed it dag-nabbit.
:(
J
On 12/14/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all
a few of us were chatting about the various vlogging collaborations and
we thought let's have a video conference about it
so the topic is Videoblogging collaborations, looking back at 2006 and
Normally I would agree with that thought process, but in this case it
just seemed, unduly harsh, in my opinion.especialy considering
that this thread had nothing to do with Amanda or Casey or their
work
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
SWEET..
I was on fox news a while go too.. but was like 2 secs..
wert wert
nick
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, stacyherbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been reading the thousands of messages about Amanda Congdon on
ABC, so I thought maybe people would be interested in knowing that
damn.. missed the meeting.. so what is going down?
Nick
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all
a few of us were chatting about the various vlogging collaborations and
we thought let's have a video conference about it
so the topic is
Argh! That's 5:30am over here. I missed it. (I'm incapable of getting
up that early :D) There goes another chance of making myself known :(
Edmund
http://swiftywriting.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all
a few of us were chatting
Hi Gary, no need. I think Sul just meant he didn't want people to be
antagonistic with each other.
My intent is to provide feedback that will hopefully be useful to
others.
There is a direction I was going with this and it has to do with
business practices. Because everyone in the Amanda
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Nick Schmidt wrote:
damn.. missed the meeting.. so what is going down?
Nick
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:09 AM, Jan / The Faux Press wrote:
aw - missed it dag-nabbit.
:(
J
it was a good one. the general topic was videoblogging
collaborations.
it was
Andrew vs. Amanda, Part 9,452,953: When Blogging It Ain't Enough
On 12/15/06, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary, no need. I think Sul just meant he didn't want people to be
antagonistic with each other.
My intent is to provide feedback that will hopefully be useful to
hey Edmund!
you are more famous than you know ;)
just name the time and we'll try and set one up around it.
i don't care if it translates to 3:30am here, I'll join in.
pic a time and a topic
markus
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Edmund Yeo wrote:
Argh! That's 5:30am over here. I missed it.
Yaay! Someday, I'm going to drop by and appoint myself the official
representative (ambassador?) of Malaysia's vloggers (... not that we
have that many of em').
Guess I'm so totally going to contradict my personal principles
about using my own exotic country as a gimmick to draw some cheap
... er, holy crap, Markus, really?
I was just kidding in my previous entry :D
Actually, 4am is usually my bedtime, so I can actually do 1-3am (in
fact, it's my preferred time, I'm a night guy :D). The timezone over
here is GMT + 8:00.
I mean, I'm pretty much going to be around almost everyday
Chris,
As with any business, we'll work to create the appropriate
relationships to share revenue when that comes about. For now, it's
more about building awareness, driving attention to the work.
Has that caught on yet? The notion that what we're trying to do is
separate what YOU do from the
I know how it goes...
When Little Jerry Seinfeld (my former cat) and I started working together in
2005, we got off to a good start, but after starring in some of my most
popular videos, he demanded more from me. He wanted me to agree to a
contract where he would get a can of tuna a day, and a
BTW, if you don't mind me asking who's the windows developer?
On 12/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweet Josh,
I'm glad to hear it's a rewrite. The previous Windows version was
very complicated and had some confusing workflow issues. Nothing bad,
but sometimes in the
Sweet Josh,
I'm glad to hear it's a rewrite. The previous Windows version was
very complicated and had some confusing workflow issues. Nothing bad,
but sometimes in the process of developing and experimenting you need
to burn down the code base a little and really figure out what's
important
I'm sure Mac works better than the new Windows since the old Window was
horrible by my comparison. But I'll give the new PC version a try. Now people
need to by a Zune.
JCH
www.jchtv.com
Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, us mac users stand in the wings with the
And let's be honest - Winnie has a sweet rack.
KIDDING
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After Jerry left, I was forced to find a new cat-co-host. I searched all
over and found some real talent with Winnie Cooper. As she grew she proved
to be a
Josh - That was the best post I have read here in a loong
time.nicely done!
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know how it goes...
When Little Jerry Seinfeld (my former cat) and I started working
together
Here's my edited response to all this from 3vilvlog:
We make money, you make money. Is that in an agreement someplace?
That should be front and center. Everyone wants our content these days,
and everyone wants it for free so they can make money off of it and we
get squat. So skepticism is a
On Dec 15, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Chuck Olsen wrote:
Here's a question I don't know the answer to: How does TV Guide work?
Who pays whom?
this may be related:
http://www.cmcsk.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=118591p=irol-
newsArticleID=493748highlight=
they also:
1. syndicate
TV Guide Online Signs
ok, i scheduled a video conference for Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:30:00 GMT
all are welcome.
i think that is 1am sunday for you Edmund, 9am saturday california time
for me, noon in ny, and 5pm GMT
(i.e. in about 21 hours from now)
you can go to the url anytime and check that the time is correct for
Just joking though, I'm really pleased to see Fireant siezing the moment.
from the reviews of the zune, it may very well only be a moment.
On 12/14/06, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume it's just the same old windows version of fireant, but it's
black,
and has a new name.
hey michael verdi,
yesterday in the video conference you mentioned that you convert from
mpeg4 to dv as part of your workflow when using your xacti
can you elaborate on that a bit more? why and how you do you do that
(i.e., settings)?
do other folks do this too?
here's a link to that part of
Friday, December 15, 2006, 7:52:25 PM, Markus Sandy wrote:
ok, i scheduled a video conference for Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:30:00 GMT
Umm. is that right? I just checked your link and it says
it starts in 20 hours (at 1700 GMT on Sat 16th)
--
Frank Carver http://www.makevideo.org.uk
As far as I could work out everything else he said in the email was
accurate, just that first line was totally wrong in terms of day
time, maybe cutpasted the wrong thing.
So yeah its on Saturday 5PM GMT.
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks frank, you are correct. i copied the time from another meeting
should be
16-Dec-06 at 17:00 GMT
the rest of the info was correct
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/8d7c39-6763
On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Frank Carver wrote:
Friday, December 15, 2006, 7:52:25 PM, Markus Sandy wrote:
After further consideration I think part of the problem is that parts
of your messages and confirmation emails to people sound a bit arrogant.
Some peeps are tired of being told how much good these 3rd party
leeches are going to do for them.
It can hardly be new that relationships between
Okay I soon foudn this on businessweek:
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2006/10/network2tv_vona.html
Oh how I am reassured, not...
Here's where this gets really interesting: Pulver believes that, in
2007, we'll see the rise of a new TV network that will eventually
I'd be curious to hear why you think it's a bad idea?
Vlog networks are inevitable. PodTech is a podcast network of sorts.
There are a lot of people making shows that want to do that for
a living. Many of them spend all of their time making great content,
but have no time or perhaps expertise
Hope everyone has a great holiday!
Merry Xmas!
Rockin Quaanza!
Don't buy too much! It's a skam!
Don't buy this stuff!:
http://schlomolog.blogspot.com/2005/11/what-not-to-buy-this-holiday-season.html
Buy this instead!:
I agree. But it should definately be opt-in, not opt-out.
And if there is a business plan to make the thing a cash-generator,
the earlier the realities of passing some of this cash to the creators
comes up, the better.
I was also annoyed because these companies never seem to want to
Your buying books!?! Yay!! Can I send you an email wish
listthere are a TON of Batman books I don't have..
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope everyone has a great holiday!
Merry Xmas!
Rockin
Hi all,
I've been working on this movie download service since July and it
launched today:
http://www.cstar.com
ClickStar is trying to take a different approach from other online
movie download services. Mainly, they are trying to create artist-
created channels. I thought this group would be
Sure - here's why.
For whatever reason, Macs suck at editing mpeg4 video. If you try to set up
a mpeg4 iMovie project or you change your sequence settings in FCP to match
the Xacti settings, I've found it to be very unstable and prone to lots of
rendering errors.
The easy solution is to transcode
Hmmm... It's 5pm for me, Saturday. Whoa. As in, 15 hours from now,
right? So, now it's easier to understand, if it's 1am for me, it's 5pm
for you?
Edmund
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ok, i scheduled a video conference for Fri, 15 Dec 2006
what shall the topic be?
I'd like to talk about Terms of Service for file servers like Blip and
YouTube. For example, at Blip:
In accessing the Blip.tv site, you agree that you do so only for your
own personal, non-commercial use. Unless otherwise stated, you may not
distribute, transmit,
great topic idea
maybe some of the blip folks can join us
i think JD Lasica has an interesting project related to that - maybe he
can tell us more about that
sat dec 16 at 9am-10am US pacific coast, 12noon-1pm eastern us, 1700
GMT (5pm), 1am (sunday) Malaysia
I got this hilarious bunch of emails from David at Mommy.tv (a really
great show- and if you've seen The Clip Show, Jim Kirks called me
out!). It TOTALLY seems to point out what some of the animosity is:
David has four emails from four separate companies saying almost the
same thing. We're one
Yes thats part of the problem, although Id guess theres already been
more than 4. Many of them did the hosting thing too, but at least that
made them more like a real network, covering the 'distribution costs'
themselves.
If you really were just a guide then I dont think there would be the
same
Has anyone here used the Vidiac service, or done business with them?
John
Jan, I wasn't clear about the winnings. I took the lazy route and wrote $10k
rather than adding the zeros. The winners in both Naughty and Nice
categories will get $10,000.
Would it be more appealing if we removed the whole wish granting aspect and
just made it about who could produce the
I do agree, upt o a point. If they were either opt-in, or didnt embed
the video in the pages without seeking permission first, I doubt Id
have ranted about them at all. And Im not ranting to drive them away,
just trying to have the usual discussions about the detail.
Im afraid I do come across as
Damn Chuck, here's where I whap you over the nose with a newspaper...
We need to talk.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my edited response to all this from 3vilvlog:
We make money, you make money. Is that in an agreement someplace?
That
It's kinda like when I made this design for a t-shirt when you guys
first started: It had the red rocket saying, I boomed Amanda.
Interestingly engough, it didn't go over to well w/ Andrew. As, far
as I know, Amanda is a sweet cool person, so I had no ill will against
anyone it that idea.
---
It seems as though money cannot be the prime motivator. There seems to
be a disconnect in the end product that you want people to give.
There seems to be no motivation in this concept other than money,
kinda like how a church tells you to pay tithing so that God will like
you down the road.
It
69 matches
Mail list logo
