David Holliday wrote:
Hello all,
I have just started using my pxl 2000 for video
Check out the video,
http://www.integratecom.com/video/
any feedback?
Awesome! Another Pixelator user... ;)
I've threatened using mine for some videoblogging, and now you've given
me even more reason to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ro9core [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ro9core [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh crap... do we want to get into this? ;)
bla bla bla i heard
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone know how long takes to transfer 3 minutes of 3gp via bluetooth?
3 minutes equals how many megs?
I transferred a recent Rocketboom to my phone via bluetooth and it
took maybe a few minutes.
Pete
--
Are there any PHP hackers here that might be able to fix WordPress to
properly deal with enclosures stored via Ourmedia?
See this msg:
http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2005-July/002190.html
Right now I use WordPress, a custom cgi to redirect to my videos, and
The Speaker's Wiki is a listing of speakers, their websites and
affiliation, contact information, past speaking engagements and other
important information to help conference organizers choose speakers to
talk on important topics...
https://www.socialtext.net/speakers/
It might be good
Erin Nealey wrote:
Oh my goodness, I seriously was just kidding. However, the thought was
really sweet :) Hugs for you!! I really should just clean up my own
mess though.
Yeah, but you just potentially saved everyone who read your message X
amount of dollars by not making the mistake you
a Wordpress demon, right? If you're hesitant to do it
yourself, that's a flag that it's not so easy...
On 8/1/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any PHP hackers here that might be able to fix WordPress to
properly deal with enclosures stored via Ourmedia?
See this msg:
http
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, R. Kristiansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This book title/theme just shows how frigging clueless they are. 100
hacks? How many of those will NOT be DV hacks?
Well, I use an analog camera, so if I come up with something, it won't
be a DV hack. ;)
(I'd
Jan wrote:
http://www.seriousmagic.com/products/vlogit/
Surfing, found the above at 2 degrees of separation from about.com entry on vlogging http://weblogs.about.com/od/podcastingaudioblogging/g/vlogsvidblogs.htm .
Folks pop in here and leave their requests for this or that without
Jan wrote:
Well, kids don't typically have kids, or mortgages, or retirement in mind,
do they?
Personally, I plan on going homeless when I am no longer able to work.
I plan on going 'bio-diesel motor home' when I no longer have to work...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
It is kinda like how Linux can make you cool...
http://www.reallylinux.com/docs/cool.shtml
Sadly, I gave up and shelled out for a G5. Hey, at least it is still
UNIX, right?
Well, it's FreeBSD... um, I mean Darwin... sort of... ;)
(Sorry, the *nix geek in me
While it's not exactly a videoblog, check out what Cameron and Damien
Barrett (long time influential bloggers) are up to at:
http://www.bloggertwins.com/
They made a web site and video explaining why they want to be on The
Amazing Race. Hopefully the power of video can help them out
Adam Quirk wrote:
http://www.epitonic.com - altrock
http://etree.org/ - jambands
http://www.archive.org/audio/netlabels.php - electronic/indie/eclectic
http://www.archive.org/audio/collection.php?collection=78rpm - old good shit
Most of this stuff is licensed under Creative Commons,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah, the ole CMS verses BLOG comparison... ;-)
anyways, i last edited wikipedia... and appled this line:
Blogs often take advantage of RSS for
syndication to other web sites and aggregator software (rss
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pat Cook (Jeeper One TV)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ranted on this on my podcast earlier today (which BTW will NOT have
the open close I normally attach to each show) and an idea hit me
that if they were to charge a ONE-TIME flat fee $5 (or whatever
R. Kristiansen wrote:
Hey all,
The recent disclosure of David stating that he works for CBS/Viacom is
interesting. Not surprising as such, but interesting. I am happy to
know, at least.
How about we all disclose our affiliations? Too radical, eh?
I am currently employed by a
Clint Sharp wrote:
Pete Prodoehl wrote:
What a question! The incentive for truly creative people to create
things is that they can't *not* create things!
I create things because I enjoy creating things. It connects me with
others. I get a good sense of satisfaction from the things I create
Clint Sharp wrote:
David Meade wrote:
I was looking at YouTube today and when reading their Terms of Use ...
a few things scared me away ... I'm no lawyer, so perhaps I'm reading
too much into it, but it sounds like I'm relinquishing my cc license
entirely by using the service.
IANAL, but
ecomputerd wrote:
And we'll soon see (if you haven't already!) RSS
Video direct to TV.
Where oh where are the MythTV hackers... We need one on this list!
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
SPONSORED LINKS
Khoo, Joan wrote:
Josh Leo wrote:
Expect to see some videos still popping up on a weekly basis over at
joshleo.com http://joshleo.com but also take a look at my travel
blog which i will try to update as often as humanly possible (
http://amonthingermany.blogspot.com)
What does Am
Steve Garfield wrote:
For those of you who do not want to open a .pdf file:
$50 to buy a used iBook if you live in Henrico, VA.
On Aug 9, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
http://www.co.henrico.va.us/genserv/ibooks.pdf
Thanks Steve!
So does anyone on the list live in
Clint Sharp wrote:
Tried to add my channel to the channel guide (another directory? what a
pain), but the registration email from their site never arrived (even
checked my spam folder). There is no support link that I can find on
their website at all. Once again, another open source
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
YouTube feed does not validate.
Check it at http://FeedValidator.org
Also, they are doing some funky stuff there with RSS... I'll have to
write another email explaining...
URL:http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url="">
The error: Unexpected isPermalink
Adam Quirk wrote:
Has anyone ever received money from either rel=payment or another
donation-for-content system?
Just curious. Who would pay for content when it's already free? Maybe the
same people who donate to PBS, etc.?
I'm not trying to knock this, I hope to hell it works! I
Jack Nelson wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday, August 5, 2005, 10:03:10 PM, James A. Donnelly wrote:
Where is all the old stuff?
People have been making great short movies and video for many years.
They have been showing them to
petertheman wrote:
Here's an idea. If you launch a new service or feature, don't send a
press release to this group. Instead, actually write a message, as a
human being.
I completely agree with that approach. Press releases don't exactly
foster meaningful discussions like a message from
robert a/k/a r wrote:
Money appears to be flowing into podcasting, is vlogging next up?
Congrats, Ev
http://tinyurl.com/anabs
Congratulations, Adam
http://tinyurl.com/83jtn
Yes, vlogging is next. It took just about a year before the money
started flowing into podcasting. So by the
Frank Carver wrote:
PS. Anyone know any cheap and effective data recovery services?
I hate to tell you, but cheap and effective rarely go together when
discussing data recovery services. :(
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
SPONSORED LINKS
Halcyon Lujah wrote:
I have been working with Veoh. I'm not an employee...yet. We'll see.
To me, the benefit of an ad system, is that it creates the possibility of
making a living doing this very realistic. (Remember the ad revenue is split
with the broadcaster) AND it puts all the
Jack Nelson wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday I brought my Canon Elura video camera which is a small
hand camera just fine to shoot video that will be streamed
Guess what? No one cared about me! Teachers had other priorities, I
was
Steve Watkins wrote:
And there is the War On Terror aspect. In the past this list has seen
a few discussions about Subway station 'you arent allowed to film
here' legislation and the reality on the ground. I guess that one was
New York specific, cant remember details. But the basics are
Frank Carver wrote:
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 7:55:12 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
Permit for what? Do you need a permit to shoot video on the subway or
other locations? (I'm asking because I really don't know. Are the
videographers rights the same as the well known photographers rights
jmedakev wrote:
[snip]
Don't listen to Verdi. Clearly he's an unrealistic idealist.
My advice is that we *should* listen to Verdi, because he is an idealist.
We need more Verdi's in the world...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
YAHOO! GROUPS
andrew michael baron wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Frank Carver wrote:
Its always better to make money doing things you like.
I'm not so sure. Over the years, I've made money doing a whole range
of things, some I really liked, and some I didn't. Sometimes I worked
for myself,
Tyrone Rubin wrote:
Actually tried today also on a mac and same thing.
Sound is fine for couple seconds then a little glitch
here and there so weird. The tape is fine though when
playing to the tv as normal. Thought is might be bit
related but doesnt seem to be
Are you capturing via
Josh Wolf wrote:
of course if your domain is blogspot.com that could be problematic...
unless of course you can block a subdomain...
Bigger problem:
For security purposes the domain you'd like to ignore
must match your email address.
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the
mariah katharine wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
mariah katharine wrote:
they also have this bit below it:
[snip]
this is not a type of code that i am familiar with. does anyone here
know what it will do and what im supposed to do
David Cronshaw wrote:
Why not just use one of the existing moblog services
out there that supports mobile video and not reinvent
the wheel?
One answer to this question is usually because it's *my* wheel!
Other answers might be that people want control over their applications,
code,
I was phone interviewed by a reporter from the Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel today. He's the religion reporter, and the angle was on how
churches could use videoblogging. He picked me because I live in
Wisconsin. (Found me using vlogmap.org!)
I was mainly just background for the concept of
Randolfe Wicker wrote:
Will filters take out noises caused by wind? I have some great tape
didn't realize the zoom mike was so sensitive to the wind when it was
held at a certain angle.
What I would try is to extract the audio, and then use Audacity (or
another audio editor) to try to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of mic accessories...
Does anyone know where to buy or how to make one of those boxes
around a
mic (logos on 'em) that network folks have ?
Well, I tend to be a DIY guy myself, and if I wanted to make
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exciting news on the TiVo front. It seems the newest version of TiVo
software along with the newest version of TiVo Desktop (PC Users only,
sorry), will allow transferring MPEG2 encoded video to your TiVo. Now
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, I'm looking to change cellphone providers and, while I'm at it,
cell phones.
My choices are:
Sony Ericsson S710
Siemens S66
Sony Ericsson Z500
Does anyone know anything about these phones and the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
However, while reading the intro to a book about it, they advised
against attempting to dive directly into Final Cut Pro. I ended up
buying a book on Final Cut Express and reading about nondestructive
editing versus destructive editing makes me
Jen Simmons wrote:
Now all you have to do is define what a blog is.
Some would argue it is just another name for website.
-David
I wouldn't be one of those people.
I started building websites in 1998. I started building blogs in 2002.
There's a big difference between the way a static
Charles HOPE wrote:
David Yirchott wrote:
Are all current blogs without RSS not full blogs?
I'm still waiting to hear of these many blogs that aren't running RSS +
trackbacks. What is their number compared to those that do? Remember, these
words are description of reality, not
Jack Nelson wrote:
I was just wondering if it is possible to add meta data (for instance keywords) in a Blogger
entry. I know that the home page of the blog has this, but I'm interested in adding
keywords to the individual entries. I can add the meta tag to the html when I add an entry,
ryanne hodson wrote:
can anyone help us trouble shoot our feed?
http://feeds.feedburner.com/freevlog/newvloggers
i've been posting new people's vids
and nothing is showing up.
i think our wordpress feed is messed up
so our feedburner feed is messed up too.
i feel like i should
Michael Verdi wrote:
That being said, I'd
teach people how to videoblog with an old tire and some bran flakes
if that's what was available.
That pretty much describes the equipment I use. Plus duct tape, you can
never have enough duct tape.
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog
JS Online: Podcasts are so last year
URL:http://www.jsonline.com/news/wauk/aug05/350503.asp
(If it asks you to register just fill in some semi-phony values, darn
that old media!)
A few of us are mentioned, and they sent a photographer to my house
last night. I'll find out if they use any
Kunga wrote:
I'm still very nervous about putting up my next piece. I have caved
to teh larger file size for increased quality. doing 10 fps and 512
kbps with 64 kbps audio for files that are about 4 mb a minute. But
I'm not sure they look that much better than 10 fps and 256 kbps
Pete Prodoehl wrote:
JS Online: Podcasts are so last year
URL:http://www.jsonline.com/news/wauk/aug05/350503.asp
(If it asks you to register just fill in some semi-phony values, darn
that old media!)
A few of us are mentioned, and they sent a photographer to my house
last night
robert wrote:
Looking even closer - Upper Center - Nice Model Box for Original
Enterprise. - Is that a remake or vintage model?
Remake, got it in the 1990's... It has cool phaser sound effects.
If I would have had advance notice I could have strategically placed
more nerd/geek toys. ;)
Hey group, a friend of mine asked about good webcams. I suggested the
iSight, but he's using Windows XP, not one of those nice Macs...
Any suggestions on a decent quality webcam for Windows XP?
thanks...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
duncan speakman wrote:
On a side note, check out this oddity...
http://www.independent.co.uk/
http://independent.co.uk/
The URL with the www goes to the news site and the URL without the
www goes to a travel site.
i've never quite understood the www thing, demon (my isp) say they can;t
Dave Slusher made a video about hacking the CVS camcorder:
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/49095
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the
skullcrew webmaster wrote:
Wow...
Good for you and everyone who wants to do that...there are some people
who don't want to be a journalist.
Does that make us less of a vlogger?
No, I think to be a vlogger you have to put video on your website, which
is a blog, and (possibly) has an RSS
Steve Watkins wrote:
I was specifically referring to software and services made
specifically for videobloggers. ourmedia, fireant, mefeedia, vlogmap
would be examples of the sorts of things I mean.
FireANT is freeware (license unknown)
I/ON is freeware (license unknown)
DTV is GPL'd
PenguinTV
Steve Watkins wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FireANT is freeware (license unknown)
I/ON is freeware (license unknown)
DTV is GPL'd
PenguinTV is GPL'd
FireANT is licensed under Creative Commons (by attribution -
non-commercial -
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Which to me would mean I can put FireANT on a CD I gave away, or put it
on a web site for people to download, as long as I didn't sell the CD or
charge for the download. It also suggests I could make no changes to it
in doing so, like brand it with my own look/feel/etc.
Steve Watkins wrote:
Whats even worse is people mixing the two. Am I right to say that if
someone uses copyrighted music in their videoblog, and then they use a
creative comons license for their videoblog, its invalid?
eg if I use copyrighted music and then give my videoblog away with
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
OK, full disclosure on this... we're not lawyers. We're regular people
trying to make a cool product and a business out of something we
started on our own. We're learning as we go. There are definitely some
things that we hope to clarify on our website and in our
Michael Sullivan wrote:
and yeah... apache got its name because it was 'a patchy' web server.
its bloated, slow and lacking... but nobody knows better virtually no
competion.
From reports I've read, Apache's goal is not to be the fastest web
server, but one of the goals is to adhere
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
This has been discussed many times. We are not intending to continue
much longer with this default feeds list. Its old. A relic from the
first version when only 20 video feeds were even in existence. A lot
has happened since then.
We're working on improving our
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I think it is a good tactic. Its good to see the people behind the
software... or the people behind the company for that matter. True
fans/geeks love this stuff. It does build trust and I think this is a
good thing. Of course you are correct in insinuating that it could
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copied from an off topic subject field and turned into a new thread
with On Topic Subject:
Regarding my http://FutureMedia.org site
I worked this weekend to make all my posts open in QuickTime Player
instead of a
Navin Dhanuka wrote:
Hi,
Where can I upload the my videos?
Tell me a place which won't mind me linking the download URLs from my normal
blog.
Ourmedia? http://ourmedia.org/
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Jake Ludington wrote:
So Windows users don't have a player with their QuickTime?
They do, but the default behavior of Internet Explorer is to launch a new
browser window with the QT file when target=quicktime is used.
That's what happened on my Mac running Firefox. I was expecting it to
Pete Prodoehl wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the mystery continues. On my FireFox Mac they all run in QT
Player. I am on Tiger 10.4.2 and QT 7.0.2
What version os and QT Pete?
Trying on another Mac now. Mac OS X 10.3.9 and QuickTime 7
Navin Dhanuka wrote:
I am planning a community driven vlog on FOSS.
Any comments?
Awesome!
Navin Dhanuka wrote:
Yesterday I registered FOSS.tv .
The Domain Name is finally resolving.
I am comfortable with WordPress.
I would like to know your opinion about the best CMS/Blog for
straydogma wrote:
Has anyone used Drupal? I've heard that it's community functions are
pretty nice. I know Qpodder uses it for their community podcasts.
Anyone have any experiences with it?
Well, Ourmedia http://ourmedia.org/ uses it...
It has good community features. I used it years ago
Navin Dhanuka wrote:
I tried Drupal.
The default install doesnot have 'Categories' .
But it is supposed to be the one of the best CMS.
I am hacking it now.
Look at 'taxonomy' as that's what they called 'categories' last time I
used Drupal...
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for
Navin Dhanuka wrote:
On 9/14/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use WordPress, and I like it. I don't know if it's the 'best' for
community vlogging, but it works for me, but I was familiar with it
before I started using it for my videoblog, and I'm comfortable hacking
on PHP code
Clint Sharp wrote:
Kunga wrote:
I would say the number one reason I chose to use Blogger is because
it is owned by Google thus likely to be found more easily by Google
users - IE everyone.
Being a Blogger blog gives you no advantage in any search results,
including Google's. Assuming
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:37:31 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a Blogger blog gives you no advantage in any search results,
including Google's. Assuming that is naive. MSN Spaces gives you no
advantage in search over other blogs on MSN Search
Verdi wrote:
http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/05/09/15/1821228.shtml?
tid=176tid=95tid=3
Will we be stuck with the term video podcasting? God I hope not. Of
all of the terms I've heard for videoblogging, this is the most
cringe worthy in my book.
I was amazed (though by now I
Jen Simmons wrote:
to me this is a great reason to not worry about Apple not jumping all
over videoblogging. Let them take two years to catch on -- and in that
two years the grassroots, people-based movement (and the words
VIDEOBLOGGING and VLOGGING) can really take hold.
Sounds good...
Josh Leo wrote:
The term podcast came from the idea that these mp3 shows would be put on
an ipod...so i guess that name is flawed right there because it is not a key
feature of the content that is being created or how it is presented...it is
a matter of how the user decides to listen to it.
andrew michael baron wrote:
# Video podcasting is different than videoblogging. Podcasting does
not have the blog part. Some podcasters attempt to work this avenue,
but podcasting as a medium generally ignores metadata, hyperlinks,
and general blog mentality. Podcasters will try and
Bill Streeter wrote:
I agree with Eric, use what works.
Okay, I mentioned this a while back. I'm not a fan of the word blog.
It's really not a pleasant sounding word. Believe it or not a lot
of civilians I run into still have no clue what a blog is. So
when you start throwing terms like
Brett Gaylor wrote:
The only way I can get my non-geek friends to understand what
videblogging is:
It's like podcasting. But with video.
I hate it as much as the next, but at the end of the day I don't really
care that much. Come to think of it, say the word blog five times and
Steve Watkins wrote:
Yes I demand a HDV version of spatula.
My detailed laboratory analysis on the issue reveals that the optimal
settings for encoding widescreen spatula video is as follows:
960x540 at no less than 1500kbits/sec.
People disagree over how many frames per second humans
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo yo yo, join me, drop the P, add a D, I wanna make oddcasts.
But do we call them spatcasts, spatucasts, spatulacasts, or
spatulablogs, or spatulatory delight? Questions, questions!
Well, my personal
Adam Quirk wrote:
Hello vloggers,
Kristian has just made the first posts on our new collaborative science
vlog, Trans-Oceanic Monitoring. He's in Sweden, I'm in the U.S. hence the
trans-oceanic part.
Our first project is a study of flint stones found in a stone-age quarry
I really
Jay dedman wrote:
Im always curious about when torrents will get popular.
this way no one has to worry about bandwidth.
its always this full of potential idea.
gary at torrentacracy has come up with this:
http://www.torrentocracy.com/blog/archives/2005/09/pep_is_deliciou_1.shtml
it
Oh if only I had the money... I'd get one of these GP2X things and try
to make a portable videoblogging consumption device:
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/20/linuxbased_handheld_.html
Anyone want to donate one to me? ;)
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Nathanial Freitas wrote:
I think BitTorrent holds a lot of promise, as well, but as the name
implies, its really only useful when many people download the same clip
at the same time. If any videoblog should benefit from torrents, it
would be Rocketboom, since it has a regular release
Markus Sandy wrote:
Jack Olmsted wrote:
I don't understand?
On the sidebar of the NORML Video Blog
There is an RSS link: NORML Video Blog RSS Feed
And a feedburner gif banner (the blog has been listed on feedburner
for over a week)
Is the XML feedburner bug necessary to work with FireAnt?
Adam Quirk wrote:
On 9/20/05, naschmult [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm back from my vacation.. So I don't have to read millions of e
mails... and posts.. like Josh leo had to do..
Can someone tell me what has been going on ??
Jesus and Buddha came back (married) and pronounce George
Jack Olmsted wrote:
This feed:
URL:http://feeds.feedburner.com/NormlVideoBlog
is invalid:
URL:http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FNormlVideoBlog
There also appears to be no enclosures in the feed...
Hmmm. I just click on
Here are three that I know of:
http://tinkernet.org/2005/09/16/spatulacasting/
http://www.bullemhead.com/FiveFour/the_whisking.html
http://www.etherworks.ca/2005_09_01_blogarchive.html
Any others?
A spatula makes an appearance masquerading as a sword here:
Josh Leo wrote:
I am 100% sure that someone always answers questions, be they how do I set
up a feed to who do i embed video in my blog and keep theblah blahh
[snip]
I worry that if you get a group of a bunch of newbies they may ask a
question that no one can answer, and then end up
Jen Simmons wrote:
Zadi wasn't posting an .mp3 for download. She
added other audio overtop of it, as well as the video -- so only savvy
users would even know how to separate the audio from the video and
recompress for their music player... plus, they'd still get bushes
awful voices...
� wrote:
andrew michael baron wrote:
... but at last check, their
software only exported to windows compatible streaming media
You can output to Real Media which can run on a Mac.
I would just make sure you are happy
with that limited audience solution.
Whether you like
BevSykes wrote:
I'm not exactly sure how WMV is the least friendly format in terms of
sharing and colloboration.
It IS correct, though, isn't it, that if you have a Mac you can't view wmv
files? Or is that not true?
If you're lucky you can view them. In another thread I mentioned how I
Bill Streeter wrote:
Unless I missed something, I think this conversation misses the
point that it's a violation of copyright to use the music in
question as a soundtrack without permission. It has nothing to do
with whether people can strip a song out of a movie or not. That's
irrelevant
I've been using an old analog video camera for my videobloggging (which
is a bit time consuming when it comes to doing the analog to digital
conversion) and I've been considering getting a cheap dv cam, one of the
under $90 models I've seen from Vivitar, Mustek, or Aiptek.
I know these are
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
Hey, Greg,
Are you interested in codifying your research in our burgeoning wiki
entry on the subject of cameras?
HERE: URL: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Hardware
One of the cheap dv cams I was looking at used the asf format, which was
discussed
Adam Quirk wrote:
Jan mentioned something last weekend that I wouldn't have thought about:
Once a hand-held camera shot (shaky) is blown up full screen, a lot of
people are going to be puking. The shakiness is fine when it's a little
window, but when it's all you see, people are liable to
Steve Watkins wrote:
The problem I have with the cvs camera/hack is its not a proper
sustainable model, its not a solution that can be given to millions of
people via schools.
Sidenote: If you are not following the CVS camera hacking, the original
firmware version 3.40 was easily hacked, but
1 - 100 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
