I've used this lav mic a few times and recommend it highly. The spec
are here:
http://www.countryman.com/store/product.asp?id=1catid=10
I'm selling this one, if you email me from this list I will make a
better price than I put on craigslist. It's like new, you will love it.
Wait, oooh, wait. Why don't we call this video over IP thing we're
doing simply VoIP.
Nah, never mind, that'll never catch on, it's too hard to pronounce :o)
On Jun 5, 2006, at 3:32 PM, LeanBackVids.com wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think you're wrong. In fact, it's possible one of the most viable tracks of all. I say go for it. Viva net video ads. -- cheers r Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively my vlog: http://r.24x7.com reliable hosting: http://foo.24x7.comOn May 24, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Adam Quirk
Hey all,
The NYT (no reg needed with below link) ran a piece re youtube and what
was behind the popularity surge of Mayday's Groundhog Day video.
http://snipurl.com/qrpz
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
reliable hosting:
get a room
On May 21, 2006, at 10:50 PM, missbhavens1969 wrote:
Susan,
you are simply the coolest. Have I ever told you that?
Bekah
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bekah--if you ever want to be a tourist in my town--Dallas--here's
an open-ended
LOL
For the longest time I've thought the parody would be rocketbust.com
however out of my deep respect for our boomers vénérable Amanda and
Andrew I kept it under my hat, as it were.
Energiser Bunny, imho, still holds the parody trophy by more than a
neck :o)
Your best work yet, imho.
Interesting that you escaped the _point__cam_in_face_ style you've embraced assiduously in your earlier pieces.
Would this be a turning point, a momentary departure or an unconscious aberration? What inspired this leap?
On May 20, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Josh Leo wrote:
If you missed reading Steve's Off On A Tangent this week have peek at this:
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2006/05/whats-wrong-with-this-picture.html>
Reporters. Geez.
>From Steve's post:
So as the reporter started to take a picture of the people at table, I brought out my camera to get a
Hey all,
Saw a notice re the below link, thought there might be a person or two
on here who might want to demo teh skillz.
(disclosure: am not involved with the film however enjoy Linklater's
work)
http://scanner.res.com/
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my
Wow. I was going to post for sale on CL my Sony PD150 kit however this leads me to believe I've now got worthless junk and should just toss it or keep it for a spare.
Man, I would love to buy couple of these Panasonics to mess around with.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo,
That like poking the beaver, as we say here in the big city?
On May 15, 2006, at 2:10 AM, Adrian Miles wrote:
hi all
sorry for subject, that's an Australianism...
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Anyone got an opinion?
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Whoa, this is the maddest thread yet. EVAH.
Congrats to all helping n00bs decide this list is NOT the place to hang
out and ask questions and recruit.
Geez, the guy with the orig post was looking for our help and offering
employment for a vlogger, and we give him grief?
I haven't read the
perhaps google should get on with it and purchase youtube.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
reliable hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On May 8, 2006, at 8:13 AM, Jan McLaughlin wrote:
CSPAN demands YouTube and ifilm.com remove the vids.
outstanding. lyrical. smooth. agreed, damn cool.
On May 4, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Adam Quirk wrote:
Everyone needs to check out videostring.net
Amazing poetic video project by Serra of headsoff
So damn cool.
-- Forwarded message --
From: serra [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 3, 2006
x-tad-bigger When, seventeen years ago, I designed the Web, I.../x-tad-bigger
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/132>
Yeah, click and read, it's the post du jour. Here's more quotage if you're still feeling lazy about reading tbl's post :
x-tad-biggerIt is the basis of democracy, by
There's a LOT to communications reform, learn more re what some are
doing here:
http://pulver.com/savethenet/
and here:
http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/004462.html
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
reliable hosting:
mango peeling and more...
http://www.lifehacker.com/software/video-demonstration/video-
demonstration-roundup-171021.php
someone on this list posted an enquiry a while back re the value of
instructional vlogging and when i saw the above-linked post the memory
of the old post was rekindled.
VOD service.
http://www.comvu.com/
I like the idea of streaming broadcasts from my mobile, like it a lot.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
reliable hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
SPONSORED LINKS
how is this different from the emailing pdf to fax-out servers that
existed as both an in-house mail server connectors and outside services
that have been around since approx the 90s?
oh wait. soldering on an rssemail mod, is that what you mean?
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo,
That was a very cool project, Josh, one of my favs in r3cent years
Post the link to the vid again for us.
On Apr 28, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
And not to toot my own horn, but Bikes Against Bush was pretty much a
blogject with many of these capabilities... it could receive
Hey all,
Came across a new toy and decided to order one to mess around.
http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/details/US/
EN,CRID=2204,CONTENTID=10628
Phil Torrone has a demo, check it here:
http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/04/
logitech_quickcam_orbit_mp_1.html
I'm not
Doh. Sorry. As usual, you gurus are one step ahead of me.
Someone please email me when the wordpress plugin is ready, I'm finding it hard reading the volumes on this list.
On Apr 26, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Josh Leo wrote:
isnt that what we are already talking about?
On 4/26/06, robert a/k/a r
latest post. Holy Embed!
:-)
On 4/26/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thing you do on vlogdir (see attached pic if you're vlogdir
challenged)?
I'd might kick in a few baht, or share/match, if others want to
commission such a wordpress plugin.
Contact me ::OFFLIST:: if any h
I'll second that.
It's: Superbly executed. A must see. More than super hilarious.
On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Zadi wrote:
Had to share this in case you guys haven't seen it yet. Super
hilarious. I love Ze! :))
http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Agreed.
Doesn't it feel heightened, more so every day?
Could it be because netizens can collaborate more readily than any
group in history of humanity larger than a handful we're _feeling_ our
fairness instinct in a new manner?
I'm very curious about this. Is it our sense of fairness the
I'd like to nominate fair as the central theme of our times, these
times, whether you choose to call them 2.0 or whatever.
Seems we are more sensitive to fairness, I can't put my finger on
exactly why though.
Is it because the ability to maintain community has become easier due
to the
wrote:
Great message, Robert.
Maybe it's time to reignite http://vlogathon.org/ ?
Sull
On 4/20/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The press appears to be cubbying peeps who make video (i.e., personal,
documentary, comedy, etc.) and vlog it into types, which is not
necessarily good or
Correct, Verdi. I'd go so far as to argue it's a nail for the coffin.
The onus is on this collective intelligence of group to come up with a
strategy to differentiate vlogging.
On Apr 21, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Michael Verdi wrote:
... And that the desire to replicate TV and film on the web
time to reignite http://vlogathon.org/ ?
Sull
On 4/20/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The press appears to be cubbying peeps who make video (i.e., personal,
documentary, comedy, etc.) and vlog it into types, which is not
necessarily good or bad. I'm wondering if vloggers can lever
Yes, Randy. Act now.
http://pulver.com/savethenet/>
And if you make a winning vlog I think Pulver's got a $1000 prize (I think, read the link). And simultaneously, possibly, you'd be doing something for vlogging whether you win or not.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo,
I was just going through a few links and stumbled across a Veoh interview (from earlier this year) where they talk about editorial and advertising. The quote really jumped out at me, I can't put my finger on exactly why.
Here's a quote and below is the link to the full article;
Sometimes those
Hey all,
The press appears to be cubbying peeps who make video (i.e., personal, documentary, comedy, etc.) and vlog it into types, which is not necessarily good or bad. I'm wondering if vloggers can leverage this tendency.
Also, as you know, I'm particularly interested in education and
Cmon. Lighten up. It was a just a mistake in the first place :-0)
http://snipurl.com/694s
On Apr 20, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
No, its not about attribution.
Its about falsely portraying people as members of your community when
they are not. Its about dishonesty and bad
Anyone. Is it my route to http://reptile.ca/ or does this site never actually load?
Buehler?
On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:21 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Someone here might be able to help you if gave a link to your site.
ahhh, reptile.ca is not your site. my mistake.
On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:31 AM, robert a/k/a r wrote:
Anyone. Is it my route to http://reptile.ca/ or does this site never actually load?
Buehler?
On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:21 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Someone here might be able to help you
named Reptile. However, I moved out of the consulting business, but I still kept the e-mail address and domain. (I've been working on building a new company the last couple of years.)
See ya
On 4/18/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:reptile.ca is not your site. my mistake.
On Apr
TheJokesWriteThemselves.com should be a vlog show, there's a lot of
good material out there :-o)
On Apr 18, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Eric Rice wrote:
So uh, who's gonna be the first person to make the obvious
Veoh-Michael-Eisner-Disney-
Shareholder joke?
/smacks head.
ER
Yahoo!
Rawlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks!
Sure you can help out! Tell your friends and post about Nata village on
your site if you can.
Thanks so much! The people of Nata will be very grateful!
Cheers,
JON.
natavillage.org
On 4/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A
Beautiful interface, Mike, I've been showing it around as an example of both excellent form and function.
Well done!
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 17, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Mike Lanza wrote:
I want the
Does the Microsoft problem extend to the embed for Flash?
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
mighty fine hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:00 AM, T.Whid wrote:
Hi all,
I had to deal with this pretty extensively at my day
Bev, I think most peeps can't keep up with the volume on this list, I know I many days just don't read anything on here. And re the tech stuff, I'd bet most on here, as I am too, are wondering what the extent of this particular Microsoft issue.
Lists such as these are about respect. If someone
Awesome project, Jon. Looking forward to see it develop.
Anything we can do to help?
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 16, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Jon Rawlinson wrote:
The Nata village videoblog, Episode 1.
Same here, viewing in the browser is my preferred experience. I like
seeing the video in the context of peeps sites and the text of the
entry.
And as Andreas stated, when the browser closed the cache is cleared and
disk space is recovered.
I can't see any reason why one would want to archive
Done. Painless. Interesting. Collaborative. Cat-free.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 11, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
As some of you might know I'm so young that I'm still hanging out
Hi Halcyon,
It's your role at Veoh that was ambiguous, not your integrity. Sorry if
you feel that's the question, I don't believe you ever before disclosed
you working relationship, at least not that I recall.
You appear part of Veoh's marketing effort, your enthusiasm is so
great. And you
Correct Josh. And I agree, that is a very relevant concern.
And Sull, yeah, I completely agree, spidering in the case of creating an index in one use. Spidering is like a hammer, if you use it to drive nails in to build a house that's one thing, if you use it to bust the lock off someone's
I just noticed Om has posted on his blog, the last link is to another of his posts (Its A Splog Planet) which is an interesting read on the situation.
http://gigaom.com/2006/04/09/veoh-vs-video-bloggers/>
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Veoh could argue that part of
Adding link-backs is not the point. If you are extending such and
offer to Veoh please make it clear it's not representative of an
agreement by any class copyrightholders who may be vloggers on this
list and your own personal offer.
On Apr 8, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
It is in
Vloggers, my personal opinion is a business person would immediately
take down and destroy all copies of everything he scraped without
authorisation, potential statutory damages and other liabilities are
too great (disclosure: IANAL). If I was operating a video hosting
company and my board was
ite, where anyone including Veoh can read the license:
http://www.24x7.com/blog/2005-10/bram-cohen/>
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
Hello,
On 4/7/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Dmitry Shapiro [EMAIL PROTEC
Dmitry, is Veoh actually spidering?
Please reply (this list), if are really as sincere as you claimed in your earlier email.
On Apr 8, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Anne Walk wrote:
to me, Veoh is different from YouTube in this way:
YouTube allows users to upload video. Users upload video that may or
Dmitry,
Manually by whom, specifically. Is anyone employed or volunteering
(i.e., working in the interest of Veoh for pay or not) making these RSS
submissions or are you claiming that 100% of the RSS feed you use to
harvest are entered by non-affiliated and non-interested persons?
Let's have
March 1.
Halcyon is a friend, and is a video blogger just like all of you.
Please bear with us while we make these fixes.
Thanks,
Dmitry
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry,
Manually by whom, specifically. Is anyone employed
March 1.
Halcyon is a friend, and is a video blogger just like all of you.
Please bear with us while we make these fixes.
Thanks,
Dmitry
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry,
Manually by whom, specifically. Is anyone employed
or no will suffice.
Begin forwarded message:
From: robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: April 8, 2006 8:51:38 PM EDT
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)
Reply-To: videobl
And a very fine strategy it is, Sull. Keep up the great work.
Vlogdir rawks!
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
vlogdir.com is sort of rare case these days
Correct, Verdi.
Clearly VEOH, given the business they are in, should be aware of the legal issues related to the unauthorised copying and distribution of content of others.
Is there absolute certainty that VEOH or someone has copied and are hosting video on VEOH's servers without permission of
Sorry, mate. If what others say is truly going on re unauthorised
copying and distribution I don't buy organic as an excuse.
No more excuses, please (assuming the claims are true).
Can you verify the any of the claims, Halcyon? True or untrue, Halcyon?
On Apr 7, 2006, at 3:38 PM, Halcyon
I'll second that, pouringdown is one of the few on my always watch list.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
http://pouringdown.blogspot.com/
:)
On 4/6/06,
Yep. And for archiving and nice quality Flash transcoding there
another one called Phanfare
http://www.phanfare.com/
I have to say I do like the Jumpcut.com concept A LOT. And there's
potential for a real business model.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog:
Hey all,
Chevy is doing a video mashup contest (they supply the bits) and before
they take down some of the more, ehem, interesting entries, you might
want to see an example:
http://www.chevyapprentice.com/view.php?country=usuniqueid=7d0c55e4
-1247-1029-98eb-0013724ff5a7
Or you might want
Any videobloggers uploading to addicting clips?
http://addictingclips.com/
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
steamy. koalas even hotter than bears bonking wabbits:
http://55broad.video.blip.tv:8000/Jamc-clip796.mpg
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting: http://foo.24x7.com
On Mar 28, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Adam Quirk wrote:
On another note,
I've got accounts at both DH and LP, both have automated Wordpress installation. Personally, I find the LP control panel easier.
The bandwidth DH offers is larger, the downloads feel faster at LP.
I have my http://vlognews.24x7.com over at blogger just to keep an eye on their service and
of Subject for the week,
r.
Jan
On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:02 AM, robert a/k/a r wrote:
Recent news re Creative Commons enforceability, Adam Curry takes the
matter to Dutch Court:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5823
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go
Yet another hosting service:
http://www.vmix.com/
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
On Mar 16, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Devlon wrote:
Hm...good point, we could have a page where people could suggest a
site,
Recent news re Creative Commons enforceability, Adam Curry takes the
matter to Dutch Court:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5823
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit
JD Lasica has posted a real people network vid he shot with Lessig -
def worth watching if you missed it in his feed:
http://www.realpeoplenetwork.com/2006/03/lawrence_lessig.html
On Mar 8, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Adrian Miles wrote:
around the 7/3/06 wtrainbow mentioned about [videoblogging] Re:
There are no good or bad vlogs, only good or bad vloggers.
/duckiing the plagiarist/remix police/
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your
Nice, Dierdré.
Is the link to your page now in the wiki and on freevlog (etc.)?
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 3/3/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL
Are you iin the same business as:
http://eyespot.com
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
On Mar 8, 2006, at 1:00 PM, peterzottolo wrote:
Hey everyone, I know there's a lot of ways to make videos, and lots
Correct. Times have changed.
In the stills world, peeps who would poke out their eyes before going
RF have the right to do so. However RM appears to be going the way of
other industries where (a) mass digital distribution is viable, (b)
production by many is enabled by new low-cost and
heh. a few more hosts / communities:
http://video.freevideoblog.com/
http://www.pixparty.com/
http://www.yashi.com/
http://www.vidilife.com/
http://www.evideoshare.com/
http://www.clipshack.com/
Please speak up if you have experience with testing / using any of these - or others that have
, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, soon that list will be setup to have comments so users can report
their own experiences with the services.
We hope this will be a good feedback-loop for the owners of the
services to see what the users are experiencing.
On 3/3/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL
and mp3 doesn't sound anywhere near as good a vinyl on a linn.
but guess what.
On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Based on viewing the other videos on the site, I'd say that means the
host is encoding my video into Flash.
And based on that same viewing experience, their
LOL, Sull.
As I'm sure you realise, the question is an intellectual one. Think as
an economists for a minute, there may be behaviour to be understood
over at myspace.
The question is, again, can vids.myspace.com benefit a videoblogger /
videoblogging.
On Mar 2, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Michael
Josh, yer talking' apples and tangerines there.
Rocketboom is not what the majority of peeps are creating, from both
creative and business perspectives.
Your reply brings up the videoblogging definition matter - again.
And the flash matter - again.
We all get Rocketboom is different from
of the shared ecosystem of the blogosphere? Doesn't really
look like it. But maybe that's just my narrowminded opinion.
:-)
-Josh
On 3/2/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh, yer talking' apples and tangerines there.
Rocketboom is not what the majority of peeps are creating, from
think? How do you see it as benefiting vloggers/vlogging?
Perhaps its good promotion for your content? I'm not really sure.
Is it part of the shared ecosystem of the blogosphere? Doesn't really
look like it. But maybe that's just my narrowminded opinion.
:-)
-Josh
On 3/2/06, robert a/k/a r
Yes, this is not an easy question Josh ;-)
The focus on benefits to vloggers / vlogging is deliberate, here, let's maintain focus and see if there is something to be gained.
Nailing down a specific or two would be ideal.
These video hosting services becoming communities (i.e., youtube) and
yes. bridges.
everyone posting video on youtube, myspace and google believe they are
videoblogging, or will believe that once they discover the word.
everyone pointing a camera at himself and posting the clip on the web
is making a videoblogging.
this group is small relative top what's going
a lot of water analogs in that last post. geez, sorry ;-)
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:48 PM, robert a/k/a r wrote:
yes. bridges.
everyone posting video on youtube, myspace and google believe they are
videoblogging, or will believe that once they discover the word.
everyone pointing a camera
was browsing this for a bit, wondering if you think it has value for
vloggers:
http://vids.myspace.com
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
mon vlog: http://r.24x7.com
hosting sale: http://foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go
new profile.
Anyway, I friended 1000 people in the course of a month. Of that
number I got 6 hits to my site.
Go figure.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
was browsing this for a bit, wondering if you think it has value for
vloggers:
http
created a new MySpace Films account and have been trying for days to upload a video. So far, on the nth attempt, the latest attempt is still processing.
On 3/2/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=5672272382>
seriously, can vloggers b
anyone tried motion.tv yet?
looks like another one sharing advertising revenue with you.
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good hosting sale: http://foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
yep. if this plug-in works it's an easy solution for those who use wp and feedburner.
and if the case, we should help noobs find it :)
On Feb 24, 2006, at 12:48 AM, Adam Quirk wrote:
Very nice. Looks like someone simplified this.
On 2/23/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hey all
If you missed, Softbank has pumped new funding into Ohmynews, this is a quote from the release:
x-tad-biggerOhmyNews will spend the invested funds on the expansion of OhmyTV, an Internet television arm of OhmyNews, to advance citizen participation in the video journalism and the
Anyone here tried this WP plugin yet?
http://flagrantdisregard.com/feedburner/
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
WSJ today talks about Brightcove, big media and the adverts model:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114048979543678723.html?
mod=home_page_one_us
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog: http://r.24x7.com
good deal : http://foo.24x7.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
*
, it
works; Jakob knoodled-out an algorithm that works.
Youtube does it too. It's a good trick, it's called a well thought out
UI. And as you probably know, good UI is rare.
On Feb 21, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Caution Zero wrote:
--- robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone explain why youtube
@yahoogroups.com, Caution Zero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone explain why youtube (and vimeo) constantly
entertain? Both have
a method for discover that works. That's valuable.
i'd be interested to hear more about why you say this.
i find youtube
WSJ Reprints:
http://webreprints.djreprints.com/1413650118976.html
On Feb 21, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Chuck Olsen wrote:
anyone with a WSJ subscription care to share this, publicly or
privately?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WSJ today talks
I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual property of
others is wrong.
BTW, wasn't this a great video moment?
http://www.apollopony.net/2006/02/frank_zappa_on.html
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I agree with this... yet I also think there are some
newsworthy clips
with commentary. That could be considered fair use. And without
hosting the content, the liability for the clip certainly does not
rest with the blogger.
-Josh
On 2/21/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual property
Further, the use of copyrighted music in vlogs will probably ignite a
bit of controversy at some point. I think we should reiterate for noobs
who may be tempted to score their vids that this is a violation. Is
that in the wiki somehwere?
On Feb 22, 2006, at 12:15 AM, robert a/k/a r wrote
Hey all
Here's another test of the market for subscriptions:
An Audible subscription to the show will cost $7 a month in the US and £4.50 a month in the UK. For the money, you'll get four half hour shows.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2006/02/20/ricky_gervais_podcast_paid/>
Do you think enough
Heh. Am just catching up on the ton of messages from weekend and see
Calacanis also has commented, too, re youtube.
http://www.calacanis.com/2006/02/20/youtube-is-not-a-real-business/
Methinks there's more to the youtube popularity. I'm probably one of
the hardest peeps convince to test a new
Amazing.
I 3 his throw-caution-to-the-wind mentality and how fantastically
non-conservative (not in a political sense, of course) is his use of
media.
I did notice, though an unfortunately, some visual artefacts probably
due to the video compression, do you think a higher bit rate or a
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
