Yes, it means that the camera was too close to the object.
HTH,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "John J. Fioravanti, Jr."
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2019 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: TapTapSee
When after taking a picture with TapTapSee, by tapping the camera, the
p
When after taking a picture with TapTapSee, by tapping the camera, the prompt
says: "Picture Closed" without anything else, does that mean that the camera
did not get a good picture?
Thanks.
--
The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list.
If you have any quest
No, the screen brightness has nothing to do with the back camera.
No color identifier on a smart phone is going to be accurate, because there are
too many factors that determine the appearance of color.
My wife is a quilter.
The light alone can change the appearance of fabric.
The amount of light
Thank you very much for posting that article. I tried loading the same info
on yet another device and got the same error. I hope they fix the issue.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:36 PM 'Marcio' via VIPhone <
viphone@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Am I the only one that's receiving an error messa
Dave,
Am I the only one that's receiving an error message while trying to
access the Blind Bargains articles and other content stating that ads
failed to load?
No, you aren't the only one. Apparently, many people seem to be facing
this problem. I'm not sure why that is, though.
Well, I'll pas
The link works for me.
From: viphone@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Dave
Jones
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 7:16 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee Creators Announce Next Generation of On-device Image
Recognition; Detailed Descriptions in a Quarter
Am I the only one
Am I the only one that’s receiving an error message while trying to access
the Blind Bargains articles and other content stating that ads failed to
load? I’ve tried this on multiple devices from multiple locations with the
same result. Ads don’t load so articles and other content won’t load. I’m
n
@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: TapTapSee
With be my eyes, you connect to a real person somewhere and he/she tells you
what your camera is seeing.
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Malver
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 5:28
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
They are such different services. I love tap tap see, because I can take
pictures and post them to Facebook, much as my cited counterparts do. Be my
eyes doesn't have that sort of functionality, and should not, because it is a
product recognition softwar
9, 2016 3:52 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> I had no problems paying for the use of the app. The prices were reasionable.
>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:12 PM, R VanLant wrote:
>>
>> Me too. At least I know I'm supporting a good
I think that they either got a grant, or this is a last ditch effort to be
relevant now that easier and more reliable alternatives are available.
Andy
From: Devin Prater
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:26 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com ; viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Why
Sarai Bucciarelli
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:52 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
I had no problems paying for the use of the app. The prices were
reasionable.
On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:12 PM, R VanLant wrote:
Me too. At least I know I'm supporting a good app.
---
-
From: Alan Paganelli
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 7:45 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
As I understand it, it's real people telling you what is seen in the picture
you send when you take that picture. I think it's important to remember
that everybody and
They probably got a grant like what happened to Fleksy.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Alan Paganelli
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 7:45 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
As I understand it, it's real people telling you what is seen in the picture
you
viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Sarai Bucciarelli
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:45 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> I just bought a picture pack a month ago.
>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Shermeen Khan wrote:
>>
>> Do t
:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Sarai Bucciarelli
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:45 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> I just bought a picture pack a month ago.
>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Shermeen Khan wrote:
>>
&g
Me too. At least I know I'm supporting a good app.
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Sarai Bucciarelli
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:45 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
I just bought a pi
new technology, and has nothing to do with the accessibility
> of the app.
>
>Jewel
>
> ----------
> From: "Lelia Struve"
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:10 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> I just wrot
date, have not been able to get it going,
but that is due to my
ineptitude with new technology, and has nothing to do with the accessibility of
the app.
Jewel
--
From: "Lelia Struve"
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:10 PM
T
Does this mean that you no longer have to by picture packs?
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Monica Jones
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:35 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Oh, this is great! I love Tap Tap See
Oh, this is great! I love Tap Tap See.
From: Malcolm Parfitt
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:09 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: TapTapSee
List members may be interested to know that according to the latest update to
TapTapSee it is now free to all users.
A big thank you I thi
I just wrote the developers and they said that no, they were not going to go
away or cancel the app or anything like that which was what I was worried
about. This is good news.
Lelia
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Sarai Bucciarelli
> wrote:
>
> I just bought a picture p
I just bought a picture pack a month ago.
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Shermeen Khan wrote:
>
> Do they mean that you don't have to purchase picture packs anymore? I
> don't remember the app itself costing anything, although it's been a
> while since I've downloaded it.
>
>
> On 2/18/16, Mal
That is my understanding free to use.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 16:25, Shermeen Khan wrote:
>
> Do they mean that you don't have to purchase picture packs anymore? I
> don't remember the app itself costing anything, although it's been a
> while since I've downloaded it.
>
>
>>
Do they mean that you don't have to purchase picture packs anymore? I
don't remember the app itself costing anything, although it's been a
while since I've downloaded it.
On 2/18/16, Malcolm Parfitt wrote:
> List members may be interested to know that according to the latest update
> to TapTapSe
Yep, definitely have same issues. Ugg.
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Yeah, a bit annoying.
>
> But, worst is that it appears to have broken TapTapSee and CamFind. It may
> have broken BeMyEyes also with the message unable to send image.
>
> I tried uninstalling and re-ins
Yeah, a bit annoying.
But, worst is that it appears to have broken TapTapSee and CamFind. It may
have broken BeMyEyes also with the message unable to send image.
I tried uninstalling and re-installing Tap Tap See, but still no-go.
- Original Message -
From: Mary Otten
To: viphone@go
Sounds like you didn't give it access to the camera. Go to Settings then
Privacy, then Camera. In the list of apps that appears, find TapTapSee and, if
it's off, double tap to turn it on.
> On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:32 AM, DJ Reese wrote:
>
> Hi list:
>
> Anyone having problems using TapTapSee? I
I would agree with this, but, be aware, when the start up money runs
out you will probably have to pay for this service too. I don't have
a problem with companies charging for these apps but it can be a
financial burden on some of us.
On 2/12/15, Sandratomkins wrote:
> just a suggestion: for tho
just a suggestion: for those who find tap tap See to be a useful app, do try
"be my eyes".it is free and doesn't depend upon your ability to take adequate
photographs.
just a thought,
Sandy
Sent from my iPhone
> On 11 Feb 2015, at 15:20, Debbie Downey wrote:
>
> I had that problem yesterday
Make sure you check in Settings, Privacy, Microphone to make sure you allowed
access to the camera for Tap Tap See.
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
DJ Reese
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 4:33 AM
To: viphone@googlegroup
I had that problem yesterday morning but then last night it was fine. Maybe
their server was having issues?
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
DJ Reese
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:33 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Su
Just thought I should warn everybody that I was unable to get taptapsee to work
on multiple devices - even two - without finally buying another subscription
for another device. I contacted the taptapsee contact shown in the "about"
section and was told they are working on having this work. So it
Hi all
The rule is any purchases made through the app store on any device
connected with the same Apple Id results in you only being charged once.
In-app purchases are no exception.
Regards Chris
Clap along if you feel like a room without a roof!
On 09/04/2014 06:01, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
Hi
It is a 30 or 90 day unlimited package. There isn't an unlimited
package forever.
On 3/16/14, Jenifer Barr wrote:
> Hi all.
> I am trying to use TapTapSee, have purchased it, the unlimited package. But
> now, every time I go back into it it asks me to purchase again. I know this
> is been covere
Thanks.
Haya Simkin & guide dog Pammy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 18:44, Todd W wrote:
>
> There is a "Share" option on the toolbar at the top of the app. This will
> let you save or share the most recent picture you've taken with TapTap See.
>
> Todd
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2
There is a "Share" option on the toolbar at the top of the app. This will
let you save or share the most recent picture you've taken with TapTap See.
Todd
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Haya Simkin & guide dog Pammy <
hayasim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What if it's pictures I want like my frien
What if it's pictures I want like my friend's wedding?
Haya Simkin & guide dog Pammy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 15:59, Marianne Denning wrote:
>
> You don't have to save the picture. I have never saved a picture. I
> find out the information I need and go on.
>
>> On 3/11/14,
You don't have to save the picture. I have never saved a picture. I
find out the information I need and go on.
On 3/11/14, Haya Simkin & guide dog Pammy wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I just bought my first subscription for the app and I seem to remember that
> you have to save the pictures somehow. How
Melanie,
That may be the reason. Try contacting iTunes Support, they may help you
retrieve your previous purchase. Call (800)
692-7753<1%20%28800%29%20692-7753>and ask them to transfer you to the iTunes
Store department. Unfortunately
we do not have access to distribute the in-app purchases, b
Thank you. I found the credit counter. That encourages me to purchase more
credits. I didn't want to purchase another 100 credits without having soome way
to monitor the loss of credits as I take pictures. I s AS i said, there's
absolutely no way I used 100 pictures in 3 weeks not when I varely
Hello Melanie,
If you have the latest version of TapTapSee then you will find a Credit
Counter in the About Menu. The menu is located in the top right corner of
the home screen. If you do not find the counter then update to the latest
version of TapTapSee in the App Store.
Best Wishes,
TapTapS
iphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Jerry MAder
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 4:01 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: TapTapSee
>
> I agree with Cara.
>
> I would love to pay for the service but to me it's gotta be worth my time
> to
> pay for it.
&
Jerry MAder
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 4:01 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: TapTapSee
I agree with Cara.
I would love to pay for the service but to me it's gotta be worth my time to
pay for it.
And there should be a way to ask a question with the picture. Plus, you
should
Mader
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andy Baracco
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 11:10 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
It's not the blind person's fault either. Geesh! Doesn't anyone have any
commo
your services until someone pay for
that option. That's my thoughts.
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cara Quinn
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 6:16 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Hi there, what Alan is saying is tha
It is entirely possible. I have such a horrible memory for names, that I do not
remember the name of the company.
David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Nov 2013, at 15:49, Alan Paganelli wrote:
>
> Ameripage? By any chan
rs at
times.
Best,
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Alan Paganelli
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:49 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
Amer
Ameripage? By any chance could that have been
Alan
Sent from my iPhone 5s
> On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:12 PM, David Chittenden wrote:I
>
> Back in the mid 90's, I purchased a pager service with included voice was
> mail for my business. The pager service was $6 per month plus $4 per month
>
oups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Andy Baracco
>> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 2:00 PM
>> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
>> responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
>>
>> The app is free, but you can
gt; From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Andy Baracco
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 2:00 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
> responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
>
> The a
phone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andy Baracco
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 2:00 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
The app is free, but you can't do anything with it unless you pay? Sounds
l
Time.
Andy
-Original Message- From: Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 12:41 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
Hi Carol,
No, the app continues to be free, but you pay for usin
apps such
as MLB At bat, NFL Audio Pass, and NBA Game Time.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 12:41 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
Hi
onday, November 11, 2013 1:38 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
can someone explain this when it says to buy credits, what does this
actually mean is it not an outright price for the app? Carol On 11
ester
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:38 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
can someone explain this when it says to buy credits, what does this
actually mean is it not an outright price for the app
e-
>> From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of John Diakogeorgiou
>> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 10:17 PM
>> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
>> responsibili
unday, November 10, 2013 10:17 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
> responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
>
> Cara I am not saying that the developer shouldn't provide suggestions on how
> to take pictures or in general use
m] On Behalf
Of John Diakogeorgiou
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 10:17 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Mechanical Turk, CamFind, TapTapSee and developers
responsibilities -was- Re: TapTapSee
Cara I am not saying that the developer shouldn't provide suggestions on how
to take pict
In fact with technology it has been proven that yes we can even
>> drive a car (probably better than some of the sighted people out
>> there.)
>>
>> On 11/9/13, Andy Baracco > wrote:
>> > This comment is ridiculous. certainly anyone with a brain knows that a
&
Chua
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 2:54 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Sieghard, unfortunately i don't think the standard tripod will work in this
sense. Unless we get a tripod that can connect to an Apple 30 pin adaptor or
a lightning adaptor.
If you have sdeddy hand
vip...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> vip...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Cara Quinn
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 09, 2013 5:16 PM
> *To:* vip...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: TapTapSee
>
>
>
> Hi there, what Alan is saying is that though a result is sent, it may
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Yes, and with training, a blind person definitely becomes a better driver. I
started riding a bicycle, by myself, when I was 10. My friends used to ride
their bikes behind me and shout out directions to me. My father did not
learn that we were riding all over the city
gt;
> From: Sieghard Weitzel
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:08 AM
> To: vip...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: TapTapSee
>
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>
> There are always apps like Talking Goggles which are free and which do an
> admirable job in snippets of OCR. T
013 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Hi there, what Alan is saying is that though a result is sent, it may be less
than useful. I'll use my own recent experience as an example.
I was taking a shot of a tin of Republic of Tea Good Hope Vanilla. I in the
end, simply abandoned tryin
>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 10 Nov 2013, at 17:08, "Andy Baracco" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This comment is ridiculous.
te:
>>>
>>> This comment is ridiculous. certainly anyone with a brain knows that a
>>> blind person is at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to something like
>>> taking pictures. Penalyzing a blind person for taking poor photos is like
>>> asking a b
is at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to something like
>> taking pictures. Penalyzing a blind person for taking poor photos is like
>> asking a blind person to drive and penalyzing him for having a traffic
>> accident.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> From:
than paying by picture count
> alone.
>
> Andy
>
> From: TapTapSee
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 1:59 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Dawn Petty
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
> Dawn,
>
> The blurry pictures will count toward the credits. The reason f
blind
> person to be a better driver.
>
> Andy
>
> From: Alex Hall
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:01 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Dawn Petty
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
> I’m not thrilled from a user perspective, since it feels like a failed ima
ent.
>
> Andy
>
> From: David Chittenden
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:23 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
> So, I am trying to understand your comment.
>
> If I interpret your argument correctly, you appear to be saying TapTap
gt; On 10 Nov 2013, at 17:09, "Andy Baracco" wrote:
>
> It’s not the blind person’s fault either. Geesh! Doesn’t anyone have any
> common sense?
>
> Andy
>
> From: DJ
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:31 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE:
it comes to something like taking
>> pictures. Penalyzing a blind person for taking poor photos is like asking a
>> blind person to drive and penalyzing him for having a traffic accident.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> From: David Chittenden
>> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:2
taking poor photos is like asking a
> blind person to drive and penalyzing him for having a traffic accident.
>
> Andy
>
> From: David Chittenden
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:23 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
> So, I am trying to un
gards,
Sieghard
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of John Diakogeorgiou
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 8:47 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
I never thought about using a tripod. That makes a lot of
Then just pay $7 for a 100 picture pack.
The $10 is for unlimited pictures for one month.
On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:09 AM, alia robinson wrote:
> ten bucks a month? I would rather pay a flat fee for the app, but ten dollars
> a month is a bit much, imo.
>
> Alia
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Chri
im for having a traffic accident.
>
> Andy
>
> From: David Chittenden
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:23 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
> So, I am trying to understand your comment.
>
> If I interpret your argument correctly, you appear
om [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Andy Baracco
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 8:09 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
>
>
> This comment is ridiculous. certainly anyone with a brain knows that a
> blind
> person is at a di
It’s not the blind person’s fault either. Geesh! Doesn’t anyone have any common
sense?
Andy
From: DJ
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:31 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: TapTapSee
Ok everyone is entitled to their opinion, but come on. It's not their fault
that blind p
my pocket
for those times I can’t borrow her dreamy green eyes.
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andy Baracco
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 7:50 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
I think that there should be some
accident.
Andy
From: David Chittenden
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:23 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
So, I am trying to understand your comment.
If I interpret your argument correctly, you appear to be saying TapTapSee
should be responsible for the factors which make
To ask a blind person to get better at taking pictures is like asking a blind
person to be a better driver.
Andy
From: Alex Hall
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:01 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Cc: Dawn Petty
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
I’m not thrilled from a user perspective, since it
count alone.
Andy
From: TapTapSee
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 1:59 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Cc: Dawn Petty
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Dawn,
The blurry pictures will count toward the credits. The reason for it is because
the image was sent to us, then identified by us, and then sent
box
> would get high priority.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of David Chittenden
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> Yes,
priority.
-Original Message-
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of David Chittenden
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:57 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Yes, you are absolutely correct, which makes a comment box essential in
ame tin of tea under the same conditions (lighting, distance
and angle).
Regards,
Sieghard
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cara Quinn
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 3:16 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Hi there,
Dawn who might have difficulties holding the phone still this could work
really well.
Regards,
Sieghard
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Dawn Petty
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:09 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
take the best pictures which are alway clear and
>> easily recognizable. This discussion is getting to be absolutely
>> rediculous. And that's my opinion.
>>
>>
>> From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of
M
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> what about pictures that are deemed blurry or unrecognizable? will they
> count toward the 100 pictures? I think only the ones that can be identified
> should count.
>
> From: TapTapSee
> Sent: Thursday, N
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Dawn Petty
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 4:51 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
what about pictures that are deemed blurry or unrecognizable? will they
count toward the 100 pictures? I think only the o
learn what kinds of limitations were being
encountered, and hopefully this info would permit further improvements.
Keith.
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Cara Quinn
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 5:16 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTa
rom: Bill Gallik
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:37 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> Personally, I would much rather use DigitEyes for identifying specific,
> in-hand products.
>
> Holland's Boy, Bill
> - "Ideas ar
website are still available upon request. Thanks for listening!
- Original Message -
From: TapTapSee
To: vip...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Paula,
We'll be releasing an update in the next 5-7 days that will fix it to only
count the su
vated by creation and growth.
Good luck!
Wayne
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of TapTapSee
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:36 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Hello All,
I'd like to clear up the Android d
.
Best Wishes,
TapTapSee
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 2:10:16 PM UTC-8, Dawn Petty wrote:
>
> not if you have to open the box just to find out, lol.
>
>
> *From:* Sieghard Weitzel
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:08 AM
> *To:* vip...@googlegroups.com
not if you have to open the box just to find out, lol.
From: Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 2:08 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: TapTapSee
Hi Alan,
There are always apps like Talking Goggles which are free and which do an
admirable job in snippets of OCR
the problem I have is I am physically disabled and sometimes my camera is
aiming at something else rather than the selected object.
From: Bill Gallik
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:37 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Personally, I would much rather use DigitEyes for
l they
> count toward the 100 pictures? I think only the ones that can be identified
> should count.
>
> From: TapTapSee
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:46 PM
> To: vip...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: TapTapSee
>
> Donna,
> It goes from the date of pu
ovember 07, 2013 3:46 PM
> *To:* vip...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: TapTapSee
>
> Donna,
> It goes from the date of purchase. As you said, i.e. Nov. 7th to Dec. 6th.
> Then when you attempt to take another picture after those dates a message
> for subscription will
it would also be nice if there were a direct way to ask a question regarding
the picture.
From: TapTapSee
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:46 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TapTapSee
Donna,
It goes from the date of purchase. As you said, i.e. Nov. 7th to Dec. 6th. Then
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
