.
Is Rossi sending a message to potential sharebuyers that Magnus Holm is the
real deal? Is Rossi getting a kickback from Hydrofusion?
Man, this freaks me out!
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Hat tip to e-catworld. They've been doing some very
Daniel, maybe you could cut down on the obliqueness. It'd make your
postings more intersting.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, no, again!
2014-05-21 20:04 GMT-03:00 Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https
at 4:38 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand what you mean.
2014-05-21 20:12 GMT-03:00 Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is
eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (blazespinna...@gmail.com) Add cleanup
that it doesn't do anything useful, which will be a drop in 25%.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the
Defkalion demo being completely worthless. I hesitate to say it, but It
almost sounds
This is a very ambitious theory.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the message Rossi is sending:
He is about to get swamped by media inquiries, interviews, accolades, and
hints on stock tips. He is repaying some of the help he has received
agenda on
top of all this annoying cephalorectomy garbage.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Decreasing the probability to 31% based on smelly stock offering.
http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before
...@gmail.comwrote:
Because I invested already. No thanks to you and your idiotic responses
on this thread.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, if you want to invest .. why not HydroFusion? Looks to be the
best option.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7
My dear Friends,
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/05/interview
-with-ceo-of-defkalion-green.html
We also had a friendly discussion and have agreed that from now on
Facts are so more important than Words..so please wait for
Hyperion R6-pre-commercial, coming soon.
The problem with busting your NDA so openly is that it's going to be
impossible to get anyone to trust you again.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
My dear Friends,
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/05/interview
Interesting point, Jed.
I wonder if this is why DGT is reluctant to sue him, because Luca would
have to prove himself by saying that DGT was fraudulent and they don't want
to have to defend against that.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze
statute, fraud, NDA, jail, and illegal actions apply. When a valid
patent is granted and the field of cold fusion becomes generally accepted
in the real world, then DGT might well fell it legally possible to
bring Gamberale to account.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
to pink
unicorn fairy dust or cold fusion: just one please.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
The subject matter is meaningless. The subject could be pink unicorn
fairy dust.
What matters if money changed hands over misrepresentation.
On Tue
Axil, that's not how the legal system works. There are no cold fusion
laws.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Just one legal case dealing will cold fusion please, just one.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote
within LENR
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the
Defkalion demo being completely worthless. I hesitate
Hats off to Jed. I have to admit, in someways the Defkalion news is
heartening in that it shows you are credible in your ability to accurate
predict who is real and who isn't. You've been warning us al about
Defkalion for quite awhile.
http://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/
If you were right
:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up to
47% based on recent news from Darden in China:
http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118
hat tip:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved
Define what you mean by protection.
Rossi is not going to get a patent on anything until he actually explains
exactly what he's doing.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Daniel--
What is your understanding of when day 1 starts--when the patent is
-in-tianjin-china/
Note: I suspect there will be an up to (-30%, +15%) swing in probability
when the june report comes out. Big news indeed.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos.
On Fri
Rossi needs to explain how to build the thing or he's not getting a patent.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn.
Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office and then he'd get his
is not
the same as being a flake.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
True, though it'll make you wonder what his view will be in another year
or two as well.
When you calculate the odds on an event you have to rely a lot on
journalists
I was surprised by how he described his experience at the Defkalion Milan
demo. That didn't jive with his blog posts where he was more positive.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
True, though it'll make you wonder what his view will be in another year or
two as well.
When you calculate the odds on an event you have to rely a lot on
journalists because they do a lot of the investigation for you. One thing
I do with a journalists is see them report something I'm familiar
So I'm a programmer, and you're all probably wondering what this has to do
with Vortex and LENR.
Well.. I have done a lot of work in second life and I actually created a
lot of virtual items and their underlying scripts that brought them to life
by interacting with the physics engine.
I am also
allows energy and budget planners to intelligently allocate their
investments an ensure that mass resources are not working irrelevanty.
This is a suble concept which unfortunately is not being adopted widely.
On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
So I'm
That's a good sign. Because the reality is, no one is going to care
whatsoever about Rossi's quirks if he really has what he says he has. I
think that's what Rossi is thinking too.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I have the book. The .mobi
From chapter 1:
The earth as the center of the Universe was a concept fundamental to the
beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church. If one could not trust the Church in
that, how much more could one not question? What might people start to
believe, or disbelieve?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:48 AM,
The fundamental misstep of Rossi was this:
The specification shall contain a written description of the invention,
and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear,
concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to
which it pertains, or with which it
If the e-Cat pans out - not just a soap opera, but a fundamental
re-evaluation of the how we should investigate and
perceive physical reality itself.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Stop the teasin already :)
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I now have revised revised and revised expanded slides. Some from
Mizuno and some from Yoshino. I may not be able to upload them until
tomorrow. But you'll like 'em.
I translated
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/20/does-the-big-bang-breakthrough-offer-proof-of-god/?hpt=hp_t4
It's sort of like minecraft and the simulator was seeded with the random
number 42.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Blaze Spinnaker
http
Axil, I don't get it. Why not optimize this for power generation? Find a
way to generate cracks in a nano material with a small amount of
electricity. Presumably there is an optimal material, shape, context in
terms of gases present that causes this, and a better method than just
'shifting a
Actually it's via x-ray free electron lasers.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/20
Free-Electron Lasers Trigger Nuclear Transitions
Physics is attempting to invent a mechanism for nuclear transmustation via
photons.
NM I misread something. Carry on!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Why can't I say photons? Aren't x-rays photons? Do lasers produce
something other than photons?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-push
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/opinion/sunday/is-the-universe-a-simulation.html?_r=0
Our good friends bostrom, beane and savage are referenced.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
http://metaversetribune.com/2011/08/22/rosedale-makes-case
for less than a billionth of a second
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe
There are many things about Swartz's techniques that I do not understand.
My biggest question is: Why doesn't he gang up a number of these Nanor
devices? If one puts out 100 mW, why not gang up 20 of them to put out 2 W?
That is much easier to measure with confidence than 100 mW. The input power
'The people at Cherokee have time.
I don't think so. If nanor goes out, it will be the big splash. Rossi
will just be a johnny come lately and it will be known as the Swartz
Effect
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker wrote:
The research
Pyroelectric fusion, old news. Though elements of it are used in the
finnish patent.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html
Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real
By Michelle Thaller,
LENR reaction taking place inside Nickel or Palladium.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pyroelectric fusion, old news. Though elements of it are used in the
finnish patent.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol
It's 27:1 .. it might work!
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, David L Babcock olb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/11/2014 9:32 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bettigue.blogspot.de/
This guy has very cool stirling engines. I wonder how much heat
I just asked bill gates on the AMA about cold fusion:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1xj56q/hello_reddit_im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill/cfbvi10
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I bet the Israelis
I think the idea is that it's supposed to be a question, not an
advertisement for Cold Fusion.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I just asked bill gates on the AMA about cold fusion:
If that really
If someone had 50K I'd say try to buy a Nanor from Michael Swartz of Jet
Energy and test that.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
If someone asked me what kind of research can I do with $50,000? I would
say go to the racetrack and bet the money. You
.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos.
to design heavier than air flight before the Wright Brothers or a durable
light bulb before Edison. Why not invest in getting knowledge?
Ed Storms
On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
If someone had 50K I'd say try to buy a Nanor from Michael Swartz of Jet
Energy and test
and reported the
results. In addition, several of us have published attempts at an
explanation. So Swartz is not unique. The question is, Is his
understanding correct? As you admit, you are not qualified to judge. So,
how do you decide?
Ed Storms
On Feb 10, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote
Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Feb 10, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
Edmund - your thesis is that it's impossible to produce experimental
results without theoretical understanding. I'm not sure that thesis is
correct.
]
No that is NOT what I said. I said that successful
'
- Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high
lenr+ cop
That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value based
on?
'
Have you watched this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo
Watch at 2:38:00
He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
'
- Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce consistent, high
lenr+ cop
That is news to me. What is the COP and what conditions is the value
?? This is not a credible claim by any standard.
Ed Storms
On Feb 10, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
Watch at 2:38:00
He's reporting 27x gain and 4mW
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
'
- Swartz has optimized his nanor device to produce
Woah, wait. It's not 4 mW of excess power .. It's 4mW of INPUT power.
Watch the video before commenting, please!
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
'Braze, you accept this claim based on a lecture by someone else and on
only 4 mW of excess
hope it
is clear now. If Swartz supplies devices that survive testing, this would
be useful to basic research but not to a development study. My point is
that we need emphasis placed on basic research.
Ed Storms
On Feb 10, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
'Braze, you accept
before commenting. You guys are credible
only when you talk about something you know. You're not coming off very
credible here.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
'Braze, you accept this claim based
What I want to see is this thing hooked up to a minature sized sterling
engine
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.comwrote:
I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR
device. I spoke with Mitchell about this on the bus at ICCF-18.
http://bettigue.blogspot.de/
This guy has very cool stirling engines. I wonder how much heat energy you
need to run these, though perhaps they could be optimized for a Nanor
device.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
What I want to see
Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Put that back to 43%:
Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD from
Also, anyone notice that XOM/Chevron are down 10% YTD?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote
the getting is good, thus driving the
price of oil down quickly.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:05 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
How much of their valuation is in the ground reserves?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, anyone notice
How about coal? BTU is down 15% YTD and Arch COal is down 12% YTD
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
It's also not hard to imagine Saudia Arabia and others panic dumping onto
the market in order to get
Why is it too early? I think the smart money (a very large chunk of the
money) gets out before word gets around.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
How about coal? BTU
If cold fusion is real, you can be assured that the smart money knows a lot
more about it than you do.These people get paid millions of dollars a
year to be on top of things like this.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna
Yes, some combination of that and tidal forces from the moon, perhaps.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.netwrote:
Perhaps the energy is coming from the rotational energy of the earth, i.e.
Coriolis effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect
(
-alindi/
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Roundup of news:
Our very good friend Mats:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3801145.ece
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/175507-cold-fusion-tech-picked-up-by-major-us-partner
I don't get it. Why whinge like that? I think it's great they are
trying. Let them take their best shot. Better than investing billions of
dollars in SnapChat.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
This claim suffers from the same limitations that
- please try something else. Why not take a look at cold fusion for
a change? Instead, they keep exploring different variations of hot fusion,
all of which have the same basic problems. Remember what Einstein said
about insanity.
Ed Storms
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
I
to talk with Darden or if Darden timed the PR to coincide with
Obama's visit.
Interesting coincidences nonetheless.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, the comment is been made - this is a company that lives on the
largess of government funding
-carolina-company
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting SOTU.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/full-text-of-obamas-2014-state-of-the-union-address/2014/01/28/e0c93358-887f-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html
Let's continue
...@gmail.comwrote:
in 2007-2008, was there something that happened in real estate market ?
2014-01-28 Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
From 2010:
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=6216
One of North Carolina's real estate investments that has tanked
, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.rti.org/page.cfm/Corporate_Governance
Tom is on the board of governors for RTI.
About RTI
[image: International Development - Education]
[image: Energy Lab]
[image: Environment - Water quality - fish]
[image: Economic - Food
, what this says to me is that Darden
has the background required to look into the con that Rossi was accused
of running in Italy and deciding whether it was indeed a con or whether
Rossi was falsely accused.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote
Everyone catch this from ecatWorld? Looks like everyone is starting to pop
up.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/report-from-short-course-on-cold-fusion-at-mit/#comments
*Here’s a report from Barry Simon who has been attending the course Cold
Fusion 101: Introduction to Excess Power in
of little faith,” he said, “why did you
doubt?”*
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in
repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred
souls? Something
http://lamppostreports.com/2013/08/08/faith-not-works/
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
From JT Vaughn's latest blog posting:
When we are motivated by faith, hope and love, and when we trust that God
is the one who makes things grow, we should
From 2010:
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=6216
One of North Carolina’s real estate investments that has tanked is a
commitment to invest $100 million in Cherokee Investment Partners IV, a
fund run by a Raleigh company. The state had invested less than $7
, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in
repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred
souls? Something more? Fellow con artists? You decide.
HISTORY
In 1984, a group of investors
Ahh, cheers.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 06:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden
(investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at
Cherokee, BA
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.comwrote:
I think the validation should be more in this style
10 up to minus 7 is stupid
1% is next to stupid
20% a hard call
50% a good chance and with some support very likely
80% JUST DO IT A SURE THING
The last two just
I suppose the archives of this mailing list will be a mine-field for them.
It would be nice if the older stuff were easier to get at in a search
engine (rather than having to download in compressed form).
Eric
Absolutely! You should get Jed to host it or something.
Quite fascinating. Like Rossi, Tom Darden has been intimately involved in
repurposing industrial contaminated waste as something useful. Kindred
souls? Something more? Fellow con artists? You decide.
HISTORY
In 1984, a group of investors including Tom Darden purchased four brick
plants and
You can't really compare DOS and UNIX. UNIX was built so researchers
could share time on a big server system through dumb terminals.
DOS was built for a single user on a low resource personal computer.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Walker
This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of people.
You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding a guess.
Oh, lots of people have hazard guesses. You don't know everything, Jed. :)
all deluded and incompetent...
or maybe...
maybe someone else is deluded.
Maybe a little aggressive :D
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
to be announced in the post.
http://ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=CFsn
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of
people. You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding
you need to sweeten the pot. 2:1 odds
are almost not even worth it, especially seeing how you backtrack and hide
behind word usage, that kind of thing.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
This is based on
- STMicro patent (Increased about
is still trading near historical highs, for example.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out
of BLP and McKubre.
Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon
Bill Gates is very much focused on his legacy. Mr. Rossi 'effect' no
doubt is as well.
At a certain age, you appreciate your mortality and see things a bit
different than younger folk do.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never heard anyone malign
Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden
(investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at
Cherokee, BA Economics) who are the players here.
It'd be good to find out who those other investors are.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
disconnected to reality. I wouldn't
care except for the fact that you took money off the table.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kevin, you're very very confused about reality. I tend to avoid
discussions with such people.
On Thu, Jan 23
, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of Cherokee PR release.
Big big BIG news. Now this is no longer about Rossi, but about Cherokee.
I know you guys think I'm a git for my doubt, but hey, my model is wy
http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/news/2014/01/24/onfirmed-raleighs-cherokee-buys-into.html
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Frank Acland was right on target with the Cherokee information
from a couple of weeks ago. Excellent work
, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
We both used Intrade, Kevin. This is how it works.
Changing news requires updating your priors constantly.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Yeah, right. You first come onto Vortex-L
Yes, for those who don't have an opinion, that's true you're very right,
they probably don't have an opinion.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
But the reality is 99
Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out
of BLP and McKubre.
Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next indie
report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna
be an interesting inflection report.
Ditto. That's going to be exciting when it lands.
Regards,
John
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming
out of BLP and McKubre.
Hopefully
, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully he
can help me understand
would have to be shown iron clad evidence that the ECAT
does not generate additional heat beyond what is used for drive. That
would have to fall into the upper 90's.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu
.
Regards,
John
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for
saying 35%.
But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a
total crank for putting that much faith
out, I'm just in a pugnacious mood and curious to know.
Regards,
John
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
but you seem to want to make a centerpiece of your arbitrary assessment
and no one can figure out why
Not at all. I have a history
Sigh. These statements and videos are ludicrous and frankly getting
tiresome. 400% 4x .. gimme a break.
If you actually have something, apply for a patent and go to the MFMP
folks, and help them set it up to show the world otherwise just keep it tor
yourself and stay invisible.
On Wed, Jan
301 - 400 of 666 matches
Mail list logo
