Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:51:00 -0400: Hi, [snip] >No mistake, but check me > > > >so..for 1 nickel 62... > >?mass = 28x1.00727647amu + 34x1.00866492amu - 61.928345amu = 0.5700034 You are adding the masses of naked protons and neutrons, but subtracting the mass of the

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Yes, there must be a mistake because where does all that increased nuclear binding energy come from? The b-decay is going up an energy hill. The Bank of Heisenberg is going to need an audit. I don’t understand it. Please explain my mistake to me. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Axil

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

No mistake, but check me so..for 1 nickel 62... Δmass = 28x1.00727647amu + 34x1.00866492amu - 61.928345amu = 0.5700034 so..for 1 copper 62... Δmass = 29x1.00727647amu + 33x1.00866492amu - 61.932616amu = 0.5643440 Difference in binding energy = 0.00565941amu In MeV = 5.2703255625 On

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:47:59 -0400: Hi, [snip] >I went through the binding energy calculation for > > > >Ni62 -> Cu62 -> 5.2703255625 MeV energy gain Then you must have made a mistake somewhere. Cu62 naturally undergoes a weak force decay reaction to Ni62, with the

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

The electroweak force can support the gainful nature of LENR just as well as the strong force. Beta decay can provide up to 6.5 MeV of LENR energy outputs which is about on the same level as what the strong force can produce. The Higgs field is a weak force mechanism and the thrust of new physics

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

out..at the macro scale we have isotropy that enforces COE but in Cavity QED the isotropy is broken http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf Regards Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:48 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:The Me

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

I went through the binding energy calculation for Ni62 -> Cu62 -> 5.2703255625 MeV energy gain On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:36 AM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:07:31 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >*(The fact that we get so little is enshrined in the "law" of conser

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

I am detail oriented. Live long and prosper: Axil On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:09 AM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:59:46 -0400: > Hi, > > Axil, I'm beginning to wonder if you are computer program. > > >I now know why DGT spent all that money to develop a rea

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:59:46 -0400: Hi, Axil, I'm beginning to wonder if you are computer program. >I now know why DGT spent all that money to develop a real time isotope >analyzer. This data will nail down the LENR process. > > > > > >When people say the LENR is

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

I now know why DGT spent all that money to develop a real time isotope analyzer. This data will nail down the LENR process. When people say the LENR is an electroweak force process, what do they mean? The EW only mediates radioactive decay. EW is all or nothing, not partial screening. That is

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

]:The Mexican hat In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:07:31 -0400: Hi, [snip] >*(The fact that we get so little is enshrined in the "law" of conservation >of >energy.)* > >The elctroweak force produces a 91 GeV W- particle out of the Higgs fiel

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:07:31 -0400: Hi, [snip] >*(The fact that we get so little is enshrined in the "law" of conservation >of >energy.)* > >The elctroweak force produces a 91 GeV W- particle out of the Higgs field. > >How can that happen when there is a "law" of c

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:23:28 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Ni62 = (61.928345 amu) > > > >Cu62 = (61.932616 amu) > > > >If Ni62 decays into Cu62, there is a transfer of energy of > >. 009271amu form the Higgs field to Cu62. > I doubt it. Nature teaches exactly the opposite. Whe

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Ni62 = (61.928345 amu) Cu62 = (61.932616 amu) If Ni62 decays into Cu62, there is a transfer of energy of . 009271amu form the Higgs field to Cu62. In addition, a .511MV electron is produced and a bit more for the anti-neutrino. When the Cu62 decays back to Ni62 the energy stays in the

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:57:55 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] >He might be attempting to extract the energy of charged particles by some >means. If they have a significant amount of kinetic energy, then they can be >directed against a retarding electric field to give

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:58:39 -0400: Hi, [snip] >What happened to the 6MV of binding energy, where did those numbers come >from? Note that the reaction given in my previous post (quoted here below) do not involve addition of a proton to the Nickel nucleus, hence no

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > >> As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay >> garbage is nothing but complete BS. > > > People here do not understand Axil. He is the cat, and we are the mous

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jones Beene wrote: As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay > garbage is nothing but complete BS. > People here do not understand Axil. He is the cat, and we are the mouse. Eric

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

On 4/22/2013 4:10 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> Nanoplasmonics. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxihhBzCjk I was worried that was going to be a Plasmatics video. :-) - Joe

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

nvolved in coupling between these two systems will yield useful applications. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 8:00 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat Yes, there is a great future in Nanoplasmonics. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ter

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

*(The fact that we get so little is enshrined in the "law" of conservation of energy.)* The elctroweak force produces a 91 GeV W- particle out of the Higgs field. How can that happen when there is a "law" of conservation of energy? Well my friends it happens all the time. That is what the Higgs

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Yes, there is a great future in Nanoplasmonics. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > Nanoplasmonics. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxihhBzCjk > >

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

we must wait until we see the data to gain significant confidence. Dave -Original Message- From: mixent To: vortex-l Sent: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 6:51 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:09:55 +1000: Hi, [snip] >

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Nanoplasmonics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxihhBzCjk

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Nanoplasmonics. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote: > On 4/22/2013 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > > A photon can be absorbed by an electron and then reemitted. > > > > The time that it takes for the electron to process a photon is called > the capture time. > > > > The c

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

On 4/22/2013 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > A photon can be absorbed by an electron and then reemitted. > > The time that it takes for the electron to process a photon is called the capture time. > > The capture time of the photon is important to the LENR+ reaction because while the photon and el

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

What happened to the 6MV of binding energy, where did those numbers come from? On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:30:28 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >However, the Ni64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the > time. > > > >sh

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:49:17 -0400: Hi, [snip] > I stated that the energy for the isotope loop reaction comes out of the >Higgs field. This might be the same thing as vacuum energy. Since we clearly don't normally get a lot of energy from this source what are the s

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:09:55 +1000: Hi, [snip] >In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:43:55 -0700: >Hi Jones, > >Wherever different metals meet, and heat is available, a thermocouple may form >that is capable of delivering large currents

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

I stated that the energy for the isotope loop reaction comes out of the Higgs field. This might be the same thing as vacuum energy. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:46 PM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:19:08 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >If you noticed, the isotopes of n

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:30:28 -0400: Hi, [snip] >However, the Ni64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the time. > >should read > >However, the Cu64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the time. > >The speculative ground rule for LENR is that

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

From: Axil Axil You haven't been reading my posts on polaritons. I have read them, but frankly they are not relevant to your conclusions in any meaningful way and I'm getting tired of seeing the same old disinformation repeated ad nauseum. Once a

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:19:08 -0400: Hi, [snip] >If you noticed, the isotopes of nickel >Ni58, Ni60, Ni62 > >will produce a radioactive isotope of copper that will decay back to the >original Nickel isotope. > Any reaction that starts with a stable isotope and conver

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

*One of the key characteristics of the quantum world is that light and matter can combine. This quantum electrodynamics (QED) condition is central the transmission and reflection of light through a solid.* * * *A photon can be absorbed by an electron and then reemitted.* * * *The time that it take

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

From: Axil Axil If you noticed, the isotopes of nickel Ni58, Ni60, Ni62 will produce a radioactive isotope of copper that will decay back to the original Nickel isotope. And that is why we are certain that this is not happening in LENR. The decay radiation is substantial, easily measured a

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

However, the Ni64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the time. should read However, the Cu64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the time. The speculative ground rule for LENR is that electric charge concentration will destabilize a stable element by converting a neutro

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

You haven't been reading my posts on polaritons. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil > > In the Bose-Einstein condensation of electrons that surround the nuclear > active site… > > Sorry - electrons are not bosons. They do not c

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

If you noticed, the isotopes of nickel Ni58, Ni60, Ni62 will produce a radioactive isotope of copper that will decay back to the original Nickel isotope. However, the Ni64 isotope will produce an isotope of Zinc, 39% of the time. Quite remarkably, this sets up an infinite loop of radioactive iso

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

From: Axil Axil In the Bose-Einstein condensation of electrons that surround the nuclear active site. Sorry - electrons are not bosons. They do not condense. Cooper pairs of electrons can "act like a boson" in a limited sense, but do NOT condense. In any event Cooper pairs are a cryogenic

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:43:55 -0700: Hi Jones, Wherever different metals meet, and heat is available, a thermocouple may form that is capable of delivering large currents at very low voltage. Hence the need for careful measurement. (BTW, obviously not a very effic

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:02:01 -0400: Hi, [snip] >The W- boson then converts the neutron into a proton which converts the >atom from one element to another. Such a conversion only results in an energy release if the initial isotope is radioactive to beta decay, and i

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

n detector at the original demo, > which he did - but it showed nothing. Thus they dropped the copper-62 > explanation and also dropped the lead shielding. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 12:02 PM >

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

explanation and also dropped the lead shielding. From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:02 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat I am trying to state this as gently as possible without sounding like a bully. I like that. You are not too hard to

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

ones > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 10:17 AM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat > > ** ** > > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagn

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

ns of that statement. It only demonstrates that you have no prior understanding of nuclear physics. Jones From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:17 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-elect

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Transmutation through fission requires a load of free electrons. There will be a large amount of helium produced because of alpha decay, another electroweak force product. Each helium atom will require two electrons to transform from an alpha particle to a helium atom. This will reduce the curren

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

More on direct emf http://ecatreport.com/andrearossi/on-rossis-fascinating-emf-discovery On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagnetic-force-produced-directly-from-the-hot-cat/ > > Rossi: Electromotive Force Produced Directly fr

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagnetic-force-produced-directly-from-the-hot-cat/ Rossi: Electromotive Force Produced Directly from the Hot Cat [UPDATED] On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Andrea Rossi > January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 > AM

Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

Andrea Rossi January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 AM Dear Steven Karels: Yes, that is exactly the path we are walking through. Too soon to give precise info, though. Warm Regards, A.R. Steven Karels January 2nd, 2013 at 8:22 AM

RE: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

From: Axil Axil This is another reason why I believe that Rossi is telling the truth about his reactor. He says that his reactor produces huge amounts of electric current. So much current in fact that he can tap this current directly rather than use heat to steam c

[Vo]:The Mexican hat

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CEIQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheory.uchicago.edu%2F~marsano%2FComptonLectures%2FLecture3%2FLecture3-handout.pdf&ei=vVN1UYiDLY_e4AO23YEg&usg=AFQjCNEyyvYDyQJUUogwnSMdu11Ed0W-oA&sig2=KQWSEFna31LUsRB5owuYbw Lecture 3: