Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
I expect in a few years a battery upgrade will be available for a
modest cost.
Ed: What kind of upgrade are you expecting? Larger capacity? Plug-in
capability?
A Li ion battery of the same size as the present battery would allow
much more
In addition to what Jed points out, I would like to remind the nonfarmer
readers that a large fraction of biomass is returned to the soil,
without which productivity would drop. Once the value of this biomass
increases, to be converted to fuel, farmers would use less in the soil,
with
Actually Jones, light water is no longer used as a control in F-P
calorimeter. The idea of using this as a control was based on total
ignorance of how the experiment is actually done. If the cell is
sensitive to where temperature is measured, light water will give an
entirely different
I have to admire the people proposing to fuse H and B using Farnsworth
fuser. They will learn a lot and may actually make a useful contribution
in the future. Three problems exist. First, if they can actually
achieve a sufficient temperature to fuse H and B at a rate to make
useful energy,
I suggest if you want to power serious items that you attach the DC-AC
inverter directly to the 12 V battery. Remember, for a 100 W load at
110 V, the current at 12 V will be about 10 A, which is about the limit
of most wiring at an outlet in a car. In any case, you need to know the
wiring
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
I suggest if you want to power serious items that you attach the DC-AC
inverter directly to the 12 V battery.
Yes, that's what guy suggested here:
http://www.invertersrus.com/priusinverter.html QUOTE:
I have two inverters in my Toyota Prius. I
An interesting graph. However, the scatter in the data creates an
uncertainty that makes a constant interest equally likely. Based on a
constant interest, the average is 79 ± 14, with ICCF-1 and ICCF-3 being
outliers at both extremes.
Ed
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
Ed Storms
Apparently, a very unusual structure is required that is not present
in ordinary matter. The various theories have been so unsuccessful in
guiding research because they are based on the properties of normal
material.
Everyone can probably agree on that
Well Robin, as you eventually concluded, rapid collapse of a local
superconducting site would not supply the necessary energy to make a
neutron because local conservation of energy would still have to occur.
Energy might be concentrated in a few individual electrons, but the
total number of
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:53
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Don't you believe in Hy-hydrides, or that they may bind to
positive ions?
I have a hard time, Robin, understanding how a chemical bond can form
with a Hy. The electrons are in
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:50:40
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks Robin, the situation is getting clearer. However, I still have
some questions. In summary, the model you are describing assumes one
electron is in a fractional quantum
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:49:56
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Yea, I changed my mind based on the way you described how the Hy is
thought to behave.
Note that most of the behavioral aspects are my interpretation,
not necessarily Mills'
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:19:06
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Why? In a perfect ionic compound, solidity results from the
binding energy of positive and negative ions. IOW the attractive
force between ions of opposite charge pulls the
Wesley, read the Student's Guide to Cold Fusion. Most of the major
papers are listed there and their importance is described. A simple
list of papers would not do much good because it is the relationship
between the various observations that is important. An untrained or
uninformed person
Yes Jones, no one should trust the government or especially the CIA, but
has common sense gone completely out of style?
Two basic issues have to be addressed:
1. How would placement of explosives be kept secret?
2. How could the CIA be sure that collapse of the building would
destroy
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:34:48
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Essentially correct, but be careful not to confuse Hy (neutral)
with what I have been designating hyh (Hydrinohydride) which
carries a negative charge (or Hy- if you prefer that
Jones Beene wrote:
Ed,
1. How would placement of explosives be kept secret?
2. How could the CIA be sure that collapse of the building would
destroy everything and why would they care? After all, the site can
be completely guarded, being in NY city, unlike a building in an
unfriendly
become just another form of capital.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:11 pm
Subject: Re: BYU. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC
Jones, my question is, at what point do suggested events become so
Jones Beene wrote:
Ed,
Jones, my question is, at what point do suggested events become so
implausible to be deemed impossible? At what point does an active
imagination lose contact with reality and how can this point be
identified?
Like beauty, plausibility is in the eye of each
How do you arrive at that conclusion? Have you ever been in NY and seen
the area? The energy released when such a large structure falls is too
much to contain. Such tall buildings are taken down one floor at a time,
in reverse to the way they were built.
Ed
Harry Veeder wrote:
A planned
Bill, I agree with Steven. Jed, unlike some recent contributions, was
not engaging in emotional and loaded statements about religion in his
recent comments, which should be the reason for banishment. As for
politics, I suggest it is almost impossible to separate political
comment from
On Jun 12, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
From Jed:
I must say, I disagree with the sentiments expressed.
I can think of lots of more compelling arguments for
alternative energy, such as the fact that it would save
tens of thousands of lives every week and prevent global
On Jun 14, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I miss Jed. I hope he comes back.
You know, when things didn't go his way at Infinite Energy, he never
came back.
And it may come to pass that Grok's purpose will be fulfilled: He
will
have succeeded in
to dictate how a minority view reality.
Of course there are differing levels I suppose, grok was outside of
normal not in his logic but in his hostility.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
fznidar
Unfortunately, here is were politics get into the act and this is why
politics need to be discussed if any sense is to be made of the energy
problem. The US will not and cannot give up the use of coal. Too many
jobs are at risk and the material supplies too much energy that cannot
be
Well stated Steven! Jed makes people think by making informed
arguments, some of which I also do not share. Apparently his style is
painful to some people, I'm sorry to discover.
Ed
On Jun 14, 2009, at 11:40 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
Hi Kyle,
Regarding my previous response:
Kyle sez:
I agree with the view expressed here by Lawrence. In addition, this is
a group of individuals who like to get to know each other while they
discussion the scientific ideas. This social interaction is important
and I would like to have it accepted as a normal part of these
communications.
On Jun 15, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
There is no 'try to understand' of many of the caustic things he's
said about workers and the average man. Now everyone is going to try
and candy coat things. I'm sorry, try
On Jun 15, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Kyle, in the absence of Jed, I feel it's my duty to educate
about cold fusion. If you want to know what has been learned
up to 2007, I suggest you read my book The Science
I agree with John, managing and contributing to one list is hard
enough without adding to the problem by using multiple lists. Most
people on this list are adults and should be able to agree on
something so simple as when political or religious discussion gets to
be too much without
:
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Discussion/Debate: Creating [VoT] to handle OT
discussions.
I agree with John, managing and contributing to one list is hard
enough without adding to the problem by using
On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Discussion/Debate: Creating [VoT] to handle OT
discussions.
I agree with John, managing and contributing to one list
While I agree with your basic point, I agree some things are best
discussed in private with the people who are interested. I suggest if
a a subject comes up that is not of general interest, the people who
would like to explore the idea further make their wish known so that
the discussion
I suggest a public discussion stops when anyone objects. Following the
objection, anyone who wishes to continue the discussion privately can
make their wish known publicly. These people would be put on the cc of
the private exchange. If no one makes such a request, the discussion
stops.
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:05 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Jed:
Latest info. See:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/06/highaltitudewindpower/
High Altitude wind power generation is indeed an intriguing concept.
According to this article:
Startups like KiteGen, Sky Windpower, Magenn, and
To avoid making yourself ill with worry, let me add a bit of
optimism. Cold fusion has left the garage level of research and
entered the level of a well funded laboratory. This is progress. The
theory has left the amateur level of ideas and entered the level of
the trained professional.
Well Frank, such ideas have value only when they show why and how most
observed behaviors occur and how to make the behavior occur more
consistently and at higher levels. All theories I know about met only
a small fraction of this requirement. If you can have better success
in this
Thanks for the preprint Frank. Unfortunately some of the equations are
not visible, no doubt because I use a Mac.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
However, I would like to know, based on your model, exactly which
kinds of atoms and how I need to arrange them in a solid
On Jun 18, 2009, at 2:15 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Several people have suggested that a Bose Condensate is involved. I
have trouble with this concept because these structures are expected
to have very low bonding energy, hence have been observed only near
absolute zero. In addition,
Let me see if I can explain what you are saying in your paper.
1. You accept that Planck's constant describes the energy of photons.
2. You propose that your constant describes the geometry (size) of the
emitting structure.
3. You assume the size of the photon is given by rp, as defined in
This is a nice imaginative theory described in the article, Frank, but
it does not prove that Bose Condensates of hydrogen exist. In fact,
such structure should show up as anomalies in diffusion, which they do
not. If a structure containing H(D) can move through the lattice
without
meters. The rate of diffusion should increase when a proton
conduction of this length is stimualted at that frequency. If I
were not on the road, living in a hotel in Knoxville, and here
working on CO2 capture, I would try this.
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Fri, Jun 19
need to be made, the garage might be a useful
laboratory.
Ed
On Jun 19, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:16 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fringe
To avoid making yourself ill with worry
On Jun 21, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Speaking of how politics and energy overlap...
Here is a supercritical way that the DoE could reduce natural gas
usage significantly:
http://www.r744.com/knowledge/faq/files/ecocute_all.pdf
Why aren't we doing this here, or even talking
Nicely done and very near the truth, but with this additional
information that recently came to light.
Further analysis reveals that the first use of cold fusion was in
China where it helped the government off set the collapse in the
dollar in 2010 by reducing the country's use of oil.
Perhaps someone can contact this person and advise him to do a little
homework about the subject before he embarrasses himself further.
Ed
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Here is an article published in the future (dated July 4, 2009):
How do they plan to enforce delivery of the vaccine? Personally, the
police would have to come to my door and restrain me. How about you?
Ed
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:20 PM, John Berry wrote:
I don't think this can be considered political as no one votes for
the UN or WHO and it's a health
While what you say is true, Jed, not all vaccines are equally safe or
effective, especially when it involves influenza. In my case, I got a
flu shot a few years ago and suffered from a sore shoulder for months
and still got the flu. I find that certain natural immune enhances and
On Jun 29, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
While what you say is true, Jed, not all vaccines are equally safe or
effective, especially when it involves influenza.
Absolutely! The 1976 swine flu vaccines were spectacularly
ineffective and dangerous
Michel, I understand that power measurements are not made while the
superwave is on. The superwave is only used to load the cathode and
start the reaction. Production of over 30 watts while applying less
than 1 watt is so unambiguous that the ability to produce excess power
is clearly
Jones, I think we need to be clear about the attitude toward CF. If a
person does not accept the basic concept that a nuclear reaction can
occur under CF conditions, either because they are totally committed
to conventional ideas or because they are just plain ignorant, no
evidence short
and ARPA who can be swayed by good
evidence, DESPITE what the dyed-in-the-wool skeptics. They are aware
of how
many times the mainstream has been totally wrong before.
Jones
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Jones, I think we need to be clear
How does anyone know that the obit of Nebran Planet X lasts for 3600
years except by relating it to the events that are assumed to be
caused by the planet? In other words, this looks like circular
reasoning, which gives no evidence at all.
Ed
On Jul 4, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Taylor J. Smith
And thus we see the basic flaw in wind generation. Unless a backup
source of power is in place and can be connected to an active grid,
wind power is not practical. This source needs to be engineered into
a system rather than used as an add-on. The system in the US is too
fragile and too
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Jones. As you observed, the
video shows the same attitude toward cold fusion that has played out
in the US and in most other countries. You attempt to explain this
situation below, but I suggest you miss some important features of the
problem.
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
And thus we see the basic flaw in wind generation. Unless a backup
source of power is in place and can be connected to an active grid,
wind power is not practical.
My comment clearly applied to the US. The situation
They say this is an open system, which has the advantage of putting
the user in control. Why would it not also put the hacker in control?
Ed
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:49 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
I've labeled this thread OT because the subject would seem to be
unrelated to the issues concerning the
. The backdoors would not be discovered unless someone who
knows the code and has time to check any changes finds them. Why has
this not happened to Linux?
Ed
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
They say this is an open system, which has
to be less sensitive to virus and other kinds of code changes.
Ed
On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
This helps explain the situation, Stephen. However, suppose I make
some neat changes in an open source program and add a few backdoors.
Then I send
Lacy wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
And thus we see the basic flaw in wind generation. Unless a backup
source of power is in place and can be connected to an active grid,
wind power is not practical.
You can use an intermediate stage as energy storage. Why not produce
Hidrogen with wind (and solar
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Emacs, Linux, Mac OS, Solaris, OpenOffice, MS Word -- would you
claim that any of these have simply been left to sit on a shelf,
and that's why they haven't become so buggy they can't be used?
I meant just the
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
You could claim, of course, that
Windows NT was a rewrite of the old Windows OS and so it isn't as
old
as it looks . . .
That is exactly what Brooks (and I) have in mind. You have to go
back to square one and
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
I have heard that Apple is more ruthless about backward
compatibility. Microsoft cannot afford to be, because if the new
Windows does not work with old hardware, people will eventually
throw away their hardware and buy
Come now, let's be realistic. He did not run because he would not have
been safe anywhere in the world. When you damage so many people, many
of whom are very powerful and will connected to the Jewish community,
you will be killed very soon after leaving the US. Besides, his
family was
On Jul 12, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I don't know why he didn't run.
He didn't ran because he was a scapegoat. Scapegoats don't run, by
their
very definition.
It's always better to blame it all on a lone
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 11:59 PM 7/12/2009, you wrote:
All said, I see the gaping hole in Takahashi's theory being the
orders of magnitude lack of detectable high energy alphas. Perhaps
it is just a calculation error on my part. It wouldn't be the first
statement and it still would have been accurate...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:18 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More From the Steorn Jury
Come now, let's be realistic. He did
The Mills situation is a bit more complex than you note, Stephen.
Hydrinos are not the only result of the Mills theory. He has created
a new model for atomic interaction and a new model for calculating
many fundamental constants including the ionization energy of most
elements. His model
I too have studied and given lot of thought to the UFO phenomenon.
Steven has provided a good description of many of my conclusions, so I
won't try to add anything except to ask one question. Why do people
have such a difficult time accepting such a well documented
phenomenon? To start
of temporal telescope where
the
observer catches glimpses of these everyday spacecraft from our
future.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 11:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT
maintained for so long.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 12:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: The Abduction Paradigm
Hi Fran,
If you want to explain a phenomenon, you need to be aware
. We just have to
accept the idea that humans are not the top of the line life form and
we are not in God's image, at least on the surface.
Ed
On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:52 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
From: Edmund Storms
I have no idea what you mean Steven when you say
The experience IS what
Fran, in proposing your explanation, you conveniently ignore a large
amount of the evidence. In addition, a temporal lens effect should
show a lot more than just a few UFOs. We should see a variety of
objects and events, which is clearly not the case. A theory is not
worth considering if
, irrational
skeptics will always exist no matter what evidence is presented. These
people have no importance and are eventually ignored.
Ed
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
If the experience is not real, it means that we cannot trust our
eyes, our
Good arguments, Chris. However, I find the human mind typically
resists ideas that are too far from personal experience. We can't do
anything about this resistance in a general way. We can only work to
overcome this genetic limitation in ourselves and learn to avoid
people who cannot go
But Jeff, artifacts do exist. They have been seen by people and
described in detail. Granted, you are not allowed to see them, but is
that required for you to believe? In addition, the abductees describe
conditions in the space crafts and instruments used for examination
that are in many
that the event actually happened. An identical problem applies to the
UFO claims.
Ed
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
But Jeff, artifacts do exist. They have been seen by people and
described in detail. Granted, you are not allowed to see them
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jeff Fink wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 12:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: The Abduction Paradigm
But Jeff, artifacts do exist. They have
Steven, it really helps not to have a ready made explanation, such as
you have, when evaluating the UFO events. Such expected notions cause
a person to reject data, perhaps subconsciously. For example, you
would like the phenomenon to involve some kind multi-dimensional
reality. You then
On Aug 2, 2009, at 8:01 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mr. Storms
Steven, it really helps not to have a ready made explanation, such as
you have, when evaluating the UFO events. Such expected notions cause
a person to reject data, perhaps subconsciously. For example, you
Jeff, a significant difference exists between the UFO observations and
demon possession. The UFO observations are based on real events that
can be documented. When the different kinds of observations are
combined, they show a consistent interpretation. On the other hand,
demon possession
Well Chris, we know a few facts about the would we all inhibit. One
fact is that certain important elements and compounds are not
distributed uniformly in the universe. One of these is water,
especially D2O. Granted, water can be found on many planets, but in
small amounts and sometimes
On Aug 4, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Fink wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: The Abduction Paradigm
Jeff, a significant difference exists
According to David Jacob's work, the abductees run in families. I
suppose some random catch and release might happen, but this does not
seem to be the prevailing method. People who are abducted are also
caught repeatedly and re-examined. The aliens seem to be interested in
following
Frankly, I would rather have a hybrid that could go 50 miles without
using the engine, but with the ability to go much further without
requiring the expense of two cars or having to look desperately for a
charging station as the meter goes into the red zone late at night.
The idea of a
On Aug 6, 2009, at 5:32 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Mr. Storms
According to David Jacob's work, the abductees run in families.
I suppose some random catch and release might happen, but this
does not seem to be the prevailing method. People who are abducted
are
On Aug 6, 2009, at 7:11 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Mr. Storms
According to David Jacob's work, the abductees run in families.
I suppose some random catch and release might happen, but this
does not seem to be the prevailing method. People who are abducted
are also
Alan, if you look at the photograph, you see GM#1 on the apparatus,
where it is clearly shown in the diagram (Fig. 5), and GM#2 is
hanging by a wire off to the right , as clearly stated under the
photograph.
GM#2 never detects radiation from the sample but can detect radiation
from GM#1
Jed, I do not believe cold fusion will get any support from the
government until it can be explained by an accepted and demonstrated
theory, and until a material can be made by anyone to cause the
effect. Neither condition exists and I see no ability of people in the
field to achieve these
in the field can not even agree on the critical
questions.
Ed
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Jed, I do not believe cold fusion will get any support from the
government until it can be explained by an accepted and demonstrated
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:44 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Ed Storms,
I agree, but we have been hoping for 23 years and counting.
But as you say, hope is all we have left, and Rossi. :-)
I realize this was said somewhat in jest. However, considering the
recent Pop Sci
Of course Peter, this kind of reaction is expected. Patterson objected
to the F-P patent for the same reason - GREED. These fights will
become more common as the phenomenon gets closer to making money.
Greed is a two edge sword. It gives incentive but it will also cause
the eventual
to patent anything.
Ed
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 22-1-2013 20:16, Edmund Storms wrote:
Of course Peter, this kind of reaction is expected. Patterson
objected to the F-P patent for the same reason - GREED. These
fights will become more common as the phenomenon
My understanding is that a patent is only valuable if it actually
follows the rules. If the patent can be shown to have been granted
based on false claims, it can be ruled to be unenforceable by the
courts. In which case the inventor gets nothing. Meanwhile the
inventor has spent a lot of
This paper and many others like it describe how HOT fusion is enhanced
when it occurs in a chemical lattice. This study has no relationship
to cold fusion because the same nuclear products are not formed.
While the lattice enhances the hot fusion rate, it does so only at
very low energy
, but it has no
relationship to cold fusion. Cold fusion does not require the initial
keV and produces He not neutrons.
Ed
-Mark
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo
://www.google.com/patents/US20080112528
-- Lou Pagnucco
Edmund Storms wrote:
This paper and many others like it describe how HOT fusion is
enhanced
when it occurs in a chemical lattice. This study has no relationship
to cold fusion because the same nuclear products are not formed.
While the lattice enhances
And then Piantelli tests Ross's patent and finds it not to work.
Meanwhile, the lawyers get rich and while the elephants are fighting,
the mice eat the corn. Being one of the mice, this is good news.
Ed
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The title of your article is Rossi
No the action is not at the patent office. The action is in the courts
that oversee patents. Also such challenges can prevent a patent from
being granted in the EU. Remember Patterson and F-P.
Ed
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote
experimentation.
Ed Storm said this about Miley’s experimentation in “Edmund Storms /
Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science 9 (2012) 1–22:”
A source of screening electrons has been suggested to exist between
two materials having different work functions, the so-called
swimming electron
501 - 600 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
