http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html
Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real
By Michelle Thaller, csmonitor.com / June 6, 2005
PASADENA, CALIF.
For the last few years, mentioning cold fusion around scientists (myself
included) has been a little like mentioning
PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Pyroelectric fusion, old news. Though elements of it are used in the
finnish patent.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html
Coming in out
| Report
Abuse http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3122281/abuse?c=15]
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm growing weary of the same objections, over and over and over again on
various internet sites. So I'm going to post each qa here just send
/replies?c=26
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
How to know you're dealing with a skeptopath: they won't read the
simplest evidence put in front of them.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3095784/posts?page=32#32
To: *tacticalogic*
*I'd
= 0.003 sec*MjouleSamples/$
That is now 25 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more bang for the buck.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
It does not make sense to compare AVErage to MAXimum, anyways, because it
depends upon having access to so much data that one can
12, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm growing weary of the same objections, over and over and over again on
various internet sites. So I'm going to post each qa here just send
links.
I am just not convinced a Prize is necessary.
***WHY the f**k not? Whoever dumps money into the prize would get their
press exposure 20X over, and whomever wins the prize would have dumped more
than 3-4X into it than they won? Do you understand what the XPrize level
of exposure brings to LENR?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
Of course I understand what the Xprize can accomplish, I was there at the
beginning pitching it in St Louis.
But if any of the entities talking about products introduces one that
works, what prize do you suggest be
One of the implications of Mills's Hydrino theory is that gravity acts
differently on a molecule in motion. I'm not sure I understand it.
Perhaps this is just another area where the hydrino theory describes the
mechanics better than QM.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:09 PM, H Veeder
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 1:31 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
.
When the MFMP says they are ready to claim they've sufficient signal to
noise and sufficient replicability,
***The MFMP says they intend to test a NANOR
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/replicate
but they
This article is from 2006. Has there been any update since then? When are
we allowed to say that Einstein's theory is off by 20 orders of magnitude
due to 250 experiments performed?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an arrogant reply I received regarding this article:
Experiment that is almost certainly wrong, or large galaxies would be
sucking their local small cluster galaxies in at rates that astronomers
would have seen a long time ago.
First: the article is wrong. The magnetic analogue of the
Crowdsourcing.
***
http://coldfusion3.com/blog/regulation-crowdfunding-could-jump-start-lenr-industry
Regulation Crowdfunding could Jump Start LENR Industry
Published February 21, 2014 | By jennifer
A new kind of financing called Regulation Crowdfunding could provide an
important new source of
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hundreds of birds die crashing into tall building every day, but we do not
stop building tall buildings because of lost bird habitat.
***Next they will have to outlaw seagulls...
Seagulls lure other birds to skyscraper
with
Takahashi. Neither can adequately explain operation at elevated
temperatures.
This is a list that is continually evolving and I will include a 1D
version in the next go-around.
Jones
*From:* Kevin O'Malley
Thanks for posting this, Jones. It reminds me of an earlier post on
Vortex
ecatworld http://www.scribd.com/ecatworld
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Crowdfunding is the use of the internet to raise small sums of money from
large numbers of investors. Current
in the next go-around.
Jones
*From:* Kevin O'Malley
Thanks for posting this, Jones. It reminds me of an earlier post on
Vortex that was a compilation of LENR theories but I cannot find it with
the search engine nor even with google.
Big step for next-generation fuel cells and electrolyzers
Date:
February 27, 2014
Source:
DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Summary:
Researchers have discovered a highly promising new class of nanocatalysts
for fuel cells and water-alkali electrolyzers that are an order of
magnitude
Wouldn't that lend itself to corroborating Ed Storms's theories about
cracks the NAE?
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Frank roarty fr...@roarty.biz wrote:
Jones, Yes, I agree.. the paper from Cornell re catalytic action only
occurring at openings and defects in nano tubes
*Investing in LENR/Cold
Fusion*http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3128874/posts
*Cold Fusion Now.org ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://coldfusionnow.org/investing-in-lenr-cold-fusion/
* | March 2, 2014 | Simon Templar
http://coldfusionnow.org/investing-in-lenr-cold-fusion/
Posted on
Sure sounds like a Luttinger Liquid to me. But in this case, rather than
the liquid forming out of gas state, it is a solid forming out of liquid
state. Either way, it points to a large, localized, single-file effect of
lower-than-anticipated temperature. Such a state favors the formation of a
Jones:
Using your later input, how about the 1DLEC, pronounced OneDellECK.
1 Dimensional Luttinger Electron Condensate
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Kevin O'Malley
What I call the Vibrating 1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Bose-Einstein
During the inflationary period of the universe, which was the first few
microseconds, the entire space-time continuum is proposed to have expanded
faster than the speed of light. Somehow this isn't viewed as a violation
of C being a constant. In my mind, it is easier to view the speed of light
Axil:
Can you point us to that writeup? I find references to it on the internet
but not the actual paper.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In an experiment, Yevgeny Podkletnov claimed to have sent a signal over a
distance of 1 kilometer at a superluminal
John:
Do you have a citation for all these many findings? I'm debating someone
elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's far smarter and better
educated than I am.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Special Relativity has made the assumption
I'm not sure this is what you're getting at, but
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_communication
Birgit Dopfer's experiment
Although such communication is prohibited in the thought experiment
described above, some argue that superluminal communication could be
achieved via quantum
It is fact that LENR is not and cannot be a known fusion reaction, since it
is fact that no known nuclear fusion reaction is gamma free. QED.
***Isn't Reversible Proton Fusion (RPF) Gamma free? It's the most common
fusion event in our solar system. I thought you were the one bringing it
up every
pulled thread, migration to new thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905533/posts?page=121#121
To: *Toddsterpatriot*
We do know that Rossi refused a request to put meters on ALL electrical
wires running to his contraption. In fact he was offered a million dollars
to do so and still
pulled thread, migration to new thread.
--
To: *Kevmo*
*Point out where the admin mod said that. *
I don't need a mod to know that real conservatives aren't whiners.
122 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905533/posts?page=122#122posted
on *Wed
05 Mar 2014
BULLSHIT!!!
Jones:
I gather I don't really understand what you're getting at. My responses
are designated by 4 embedded asterisks.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Kevin O'Malley
It is fact that LENR is not and cannot
http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS
Figure 1, Page 5
I don't buy it that LENR is exclusively a surface reaction. The enclosed
SEM image implies the microexplosion happened well under the surface, more
like a volcano than a surface explosion.
to the bubble.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS
Figure 1, Page 5
I don't buy it that LENR is exclusively a surface reaction. The
enclosed SEM image implies
I need a better term than skeptopath.
. How about Aggressively Skeptical 'Humans' Obfuscating Lenr Endeavors
(ASHOLEs)?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
How to know you're dealing with a skeptopath: they won't read the
simplest evidence put
Pulled Threads.
Unfortunately, many of them were pulled from FR and my efforts to save them
using Ubuntu software led to a debacle.
---
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/3088346/posts
The thread wasn't
debating someone elsewhere and she is not only unconvinced, she's
far smarter and better educated than I am.
Well invite the young lady into the dime-box saloon!! The place could use
some female energy...
J
-mark
*From:* Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday
...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Kevin O'Malley
... is reversible fusion really fusion when the fusion bond lasts for
only
a few femtoseconds?
My impression is that this is enough for the Sun to generate photons,
Helium, and other stuff. Now, maybe that's only because it is so huge
compared
The important message therefore is this: LENR is passing the fractal test
- we live in a fractal universe, where a pattern at one scale, repeats at
larger and smaller scales. Without that symmetry, the universe would break
down, and LENR does not let us down here
Gordon Docherty
Oh geez, here come the assholes again, jumping on their AssholeBandwagon.
Typical of anti-science Luddites, they use tag team trolling techniques in
their attempts at vigilante censorship.
/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf
This file is corrupted. At least for me...
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
How many
is particularly important for issues of science and
technology.
Read more at:
http://phys.org/news/2013-02-trolls-rude-blog-comments-dim.html#jCp
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh geez, here come the assholes again, jumping on their
AssholeBandwagon. Typical
Vigilante Censorship
This is an excellent exchange showing such methodology in action. Note the
crickets at the end of the thread. Typical of those who have nothing
useful and honest to say.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2989565/posts?page=47#47
half the ones originally tested. That would be
50 more times replicated, by 1 researcher.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf
This file is corrupted
is
correlated with the criteria and that production of excess heat is a real
physical
effect beyond a reasonable doubt.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
How many times has the Pons-Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect (PFAHE) been
replicated
),
you will find the data set on which this paper was based.
Ed Storms
On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Cravens Letts reviewed 167 papers and came up with 4 criteria that
correlate excess heat.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/NagelDJproceeding.pdf
Page 71
The Enabling
/StormsJudgingValidityOfFleischmannPonsEffect2009.pdf
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Cravens Letts reviewed 167 papers and came up with 4 criteria that
correlate excess heat.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/NagelDJproceeding.pdf
Page 71
The Enabling Criteria
Storms cites 1060 positive result studies in his book The Science of Low
Energy Nuclear Reaction
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEthescience.pdf
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I see it all over the place that hundreds of times it's been
indications that some of these guys
were getting more than a hundred cells to work.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I see it all over the place that hundreds of times it's been
successfully replicated. Here
Excellent essay, Jed.
All of us vorts should log in and rate it, give it a leg up.
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/category/31422
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Frank Znidarsic suggested I enter this essay contest:
How Should Humanity Steer the
Jed:
I liked your essay so much that I submitted my own. Basically a rehash of
the LENR X Prize Proposal. I don't write as well as you, so you will
likely have a much higher chance of winning.
best regards
Kevin O
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It strikes me that as so many LENR researchers tried to scale up their
results, they have failed. That would seem to suggest that higher
temperatures kill the LENR effect, which favors BEC formation theories. \\\
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote
I don't see it eiither
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
My essay seems to have disappeared. I do not find it at this link:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
Is it just me, or have other people lost it?
It's back up. Probably just a glitch.
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see it eiither
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
My essay seems to have disappeared
You probably caused too much excitement for their servers to handle. Your
article is far better than the others. There are some goofy thinkers.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It is back to normal. It was a temporary glitch. They sent me a note
You're featured at Cold Fusion Now
http://coldfusionnow.org/read-and-rate-cold-fusion-may-have-revolutionary-potential-by-jed-rothwell/
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It is back to normal. It was a temporary glitch. They sent me a note
saying
Jones:
It is compelling that the protonated molecular hydrogen or H3+, and it
is the most abundant or second most abundant ion in the Universe, so it is
very common. It is also compelling that RPF is the most common fusion
reaction in the universe.
I consider RPF to be the Occham's Razor
Entrants should alert FQXi with information if they witness such activities.
***Then you should probably alert them, to keep your effort above the noise
of suspicion.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
You're
BEC localized in a single largest interval
of logarithmic size.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Kevin O'Malley
It is compelling that the protonated molecular hydrogen or
H3+, and it
is the most
Unfortunately for me, the 1 Dimensional Luttinger Bose-Einstein Condensate
seems to have already been proposed, but as far as I can tell, not as an
explanation of cold fusion:
***Also perhaps here.
New Journal of Physics http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/ Volume 10
liquid in
two-colour optical lattice, in Laser and Bose Einstein Condensation
Physics, Narosa, New Delhi, 2010.�*� *
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Unfortunately for me, the 1 Dimensional Luttinger Bose-Einstein
Condensate seems to have already been
: RE: [Vo]:Quote of the day
From: Kevin O'Malley
It is compelling that the protonated molecular hydrogen or
H3+, and it
is the most abundant or second most abundant ion in the
Universe, so it is
very common. It is also compelling that RPF is the most
common fusion
reaction in the universe
in an optical lattice of laser light. In
these quantum lattices or wires the single atoms are aligned next to each
other with laser light preventing them from breaking ranks
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Also perhaps here, this smart guy:
*A. Bhattacherjee
What would be the testable predictions of your theory? What should we be
looking for when someone tests a device and publishes data about it?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been reading quite some theories and views on what exactly Rossi's /
That sorta goes to my point about looking for experimental results that
either lend support or reduce support for a particular theory. I'm
noticing that a lot of the experiments are veering towards testing nuclear
products, which is going to be expensive. It won't matter much if Rossi is
selling
I know what metals I want, but I don't know how to get ahold of monoatomic
hydrogen gas.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Not for sale in California.
Well, that sucks... for me.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This is tantamount to portraying the scientific method as a belief on the
same par as someone who is impervious to experimental evidence.
***Yup. Scientism, which is rapidly becoming a world wide religion. The
crazy thing is, when LENR breaks out, huge swaths of populations (fueled by
the
mythology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundredth_monkey_effect
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Kevin--
This is what is called the 100th monkey principle.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin O'Malley
.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, March 22, 2014 7:53 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:True Believers and Belief Networks
This is tantamount to portraying the scientific method as a belief on
the same
I have found these discussions interesting and useful in trying to
explain LENR. However, I no longer see a purpose in continuing to subscribe
to Vortex. The goal here is not to understand but to speculate. That is
not my goal.
***Well, I'm sorry to see Ed go. I cannot agree with his
Jones:
Thanks for the informative heads up about spillover.
What I would need is to know how much H1 monoatomic gas I'm feeding into
the system. It would not have to be exact, it would just have to be within
3 to 5%.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
There are a few efforts that look like they might break out in 2015,
whether it's Rossi or Brullion or Defkalion or whomever.
All of them would need to convert heat to electricity. That means a
Stirling engine, unless you believe the guys at Deuo Dynamics who have a
direct thermoelectric
Blacklight lost the limelight to Rossi. Now it remains to be seen if Rossi
deserved the limelight.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here we go, again:
Well said! It is kind of hilarious.
- Jed
As noted in a previous article, Jed Rothwell entered into an essay contest
for the Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi). I submitted my own Cold
Fusion related essay, and didn't hear anything back from FQXi. Then Peter
Gluck had his essay published, so I asked FQXi why mine was not published
or
theory will and no small scale lab
experiment can
trigger the rebirth of the field- just a working commercial process can
save us.
Peter
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
As noted in a previous article, Jed Rothwell entered into an essay
contest
When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn.
Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office and then he'd get his
patent approved. It would be at that point that LENR breaks out.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yesterday
Right here, Axil:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg91559.html
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental
results that contradict this fact.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed
of the collapsing cavitation bubble exterior
to the metal and projected onto the nearest surface of metal that is
adjacent to the bubble.
As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This stubbornness is a
problem that will keep you from true understanding.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin
Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Any references available?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
You're the one falling for your own bs. You
be reached if the heat from LENR is
generated from inside the nickel powder.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
...@gmail.comwrote:
Rossi needs to explain how to build the thing or he's not getting a patent.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn.
Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office
US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application
Previoushttp://coldfusionnow.org/2014-cflanr-colloquium-at-mit-video-files/
Nexthttp://coldfusionnow.org/lenr-the-promise-of-clean-and-affordable-energy-at-university-of-northern-iowa/
-
at further communication.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't explain a
phenomena (like cold fusion branching) doesn't mean the phenomena doesn't
exist.
Rocks fell from the sky for centuries before
Blaze:
If Rossi turned out to be real, then what do you think would happen to
Stirling Cycle Engine technology? In particular, a company like CYPW would
skyrocket, right?
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Decreasing probability to 46% based on
technology
as today turbine and engine are small market, and that if thermal engine
are produced with the same technology and volume as car engine, it may cost
700$...
2014-05-15 9:35 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com:
Blaze:
If Rossi turned out to be real, then what do you
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
Cyclone power had it's fashion time, but today they are a penny stock.
***All the better. Here is a cheap way LENR afficianados to put our money
where our mouth is. Upside potential is quite high, and the downside
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/15/is-a-bulletproof-e-cat-report-possible/
Is a Bulletproof E-Cat Report Possible?
Posted on May 15, 2014 by admin http://www.e-catworld.com/author/admin/ • 21
Commentshttp://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/15/is-a-bulletproof-e-cat-report-possible/#comments
, comes out with any theory about how it
works. It may be that the third party agreed not to discuss theory and
only report results of the testing.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2014 2:13 PM
Then are we now adding the condition that the temperature needs to be above
800C in order to determine that Rossi is real???
We seem to be off the track of that subject. We've been talking about what
is the optimum engine technically to work with a LENR device. My question
is aimed at SWWAT--
, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
Then are we now adding the condition that the temperature needs to be
above 800C in order to determine that Rossi is real???
I was addressing the question of whether a Stirling engine would be
necessary or useful; I was saying it shouldn't be needed
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of [recrimination].
Pot, meet kettle.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
***Does that mean you think it's a 51% probability that Rossi is real?
I don't know if I can quantify the feeling with so much precision
...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Kevin O'Malley
…And my question hasn't really been answered -- If Rossi is
determined to be real, wouldn't a stock like CYPW take off? Are there
other public stocks that would skyrocket? Any steam engine stocks?
I think
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
We have mentioned this company before, going back several years, which
unfortunately has a similar name as the failed Stirling company and may not
be publicly traded - but there are 3-4 others in ORC (and I am a terrible
The problem is... Y.E. Kim appears to have moved forward on data from
Defkalion without verifying that their device works. He could have done
the same thing with Cyclone.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
You people know that Kim is doing consulting
Here's an example of some early-adopter money starting to move into this
space. The problem is, it's not available to just anyone, and in
particular, they already closed it off for this fund.
http://form-d.findthebest.com/l/162985/Lenr-Invest-Fund-I-LLC
Lenr-Invest Fund I, LLC, which is in the
Here's an old discussion I had on an intrade board about the probability
of Rossi being real
http://intrade.freeforums.org/i-miss-intrade-t29.html
Re: I miss Intradehttp://intrade.freeforums.org/i-miss-intrade-t29.html#p138
[image: Post] http://intrade.freeforums.org/post138.html#p138by
I suppose that goes right to the heart of what Blaze means by Real. If
PdD fusion were real in his mind, we would have PdD cold fusion reactors
replacing coal plants by the dozen every month, people would be ordering a
cup of Richard Garwin tea from Starbucks, and you could buy a LENR
generator
It says it's in a peer reviewed journal but doesn't say which one...
After careful testing, Podkletnov has found the speed of the antigravity
impulse to be approximately 64 times the speed of light (64c), which he
indicates does not conflict with modern interpretations of Relativity
Theory.
***I
/2239.page
https://www.mail-archive.com/*vortex*-l...@eskimo.com/msg37542.html
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
Cyclone power had it's fashion time, but today
301 - 400 of 939 matches
Mail list logo
