On 07/02/2011 04:24 PM, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
I have written to Turtur several times and he has generally replied. I have
been unable to persuade him to replicate his experiment with the metal rotors
buried in oil, perhaps on a raft as is presently done, or simply connected to
the underside
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26943/
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1106.5301: Optimizing And Controlling Functions Of
Complex Networks By Manipulating Rich-Club Connections
:-)
Regards,
Mauro
On 07/20/2011 03:16 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
...
PS: This struck me as funny What we're suggesting is that something that
doesn't really interact with anything is changing something that can't be
changed.
Hi, you might be interested in previous discussions of this subject. In
particular:
On 08/07/2011 05:53 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kitachiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex-l
I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even
logical
BUT what if a major world entity wants all of Rossi s
On 08/07/2011 06:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Instead of continuing with the research, he decided to announce it, making
waves as big as possible, to sell his discovery to the best bidder. Who will
probably bury it, by the
On 08/07/2011 07:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Any references for Swartz?
Sure. That was a reference to discussions by Michael Swartz, who publishes:
http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
He sponsors the MIT
Yes, the idea was mentioned and discussed on this list. I wrote a paper
on the subject. See
On absolute movementhttp://vixra.org/abs/1105.0032
Regards,
Mauro
On 08/10/2011 03:54 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The article mentions using entanglement to synchronise clocks.
This possiblity was
On 08/10/2011 08:05 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Yes, the idea was mentioned and discussed on this list. I wrote a paper
on the subject. See
On absolute movementhttp://vixra.org/abs/1105.0032
And here are the archived discussions:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45437.html
On 08/10/2011 03:54 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
[snip]Albert Einstein might be astonished to learn that NASA physicists
have applied
his relativity theory to a concept he introduced but later disliked
namely
that
two particles that interact could maintain a connection even if
separated
by
a
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If nothing else, this shoots down the old canard (often claimed by
those trying to argue that SR is just a big conspiracy) that any
scientist who actually measured a particle going faster than light
would suppress the result to avoid going against the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If nothing else, this shoots down the old canard (often claimed by
those trying to argue that SR is just a big conspiracy) that any
scientist who actually measured a particle going faster than light
would suppress the result to avoid going against the
Don't bury Einstein yet:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
Sher also mentions a third option: that the measurement is correct.
Some theories posit that there are extra, hidden dimensions beyond the
familiar four (three of
At least he calls the finding enigmatic rather than delusional or an
error.
In my opinion, the findings are probably the result of unknown neutrino
properties, or of new neutrino flavors, colors, whatevers. We'll
have to patiently wait to know more, I suppose.
In any case, the findings per se
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/22/scitech/main20110236.shtml
Taking the numbers on the article as a basis, and doing some quick
calculations, that's a difference in speed of roughly 7.4 km/s
If I'm not mistaken, that's equivalent to the null result obtained in
the Michelson-Morley
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/22/scitech/main20110236.shtml
Taking the numbers on the article as a basis, and doing some quick
calculations, that's a difference in speed of roughly 7.4 km/s
If I'm not mistaken, that's equivalent to the null result obtained in
the Michelson-Morley
Vorts,
So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
it was something I had already theorized myself when struggling with
the concepts of relativity (which still bugs me, for the reasons I'm
about to list) as I was mentally using the term Zero Point already.
Imagine
enough now?
Best regards,
Mauro
On 11-09-23 01:53 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Vorts,
So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
it was something I had already theorized myself when struggling with
the concepts of relativity (which still bugs me, for the reasons I'm
about
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest dimension hops as the means for neutrinos
into the discussion.
On 11-09-23 07:32 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I'll probably tell you too that for me science, real science, is about
knowledge of the way things really are.
Wrong on the face of it. Language is for communication, and
communication using language requires a previously
On 09/24/2011 09:57 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest
On Sep 25, 2011 8:56 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 09/24/2011 09:57 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957
On 10/04/2011 08:27 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here,
says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
It made its way to the news
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gone-in-60-nanoseconds/2011/10/06/gIQAf1RERL_story.html
Regards,
Mauro
On 10/07/2011 10:31 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Stremmeson was a physics/chemistry professor from university of bologna.
He made several error inside this report. That’s not a typo, is a conceptual
error, a big one.
No, it isn't. He's talking about energy (Kwh) flow (/h).
On 10/08/2011 03:47 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-10-08 20:41, Horace Heffner wrote:
I don't see any charts. What am I doing wrong? Is there a link there I
am missing?
You are not doing anything wrong. It looks you need to subscribe to that
discussion board to see the charts.
On 11/06/2011 12:58 AM, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
Don't know if this is of any help at all, but take a look at the
following page.
How to tell if someone is telling a lie or lying: Viewzone
See: http://viewzone2.com/liarx.html
I wouldn't mind she lied to me a couple of times :-D Although,
On 11/06/2011 09:31 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 13:19, schrieb Peter Gluck:
OK, as far as you refer to science; can you tell a few absolute truths
re Cold Fusion or LENR except they exist?
If you have time please continue with lists of absolute truths
from technology, management,
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified isomers.
I am quite perplexed that
On 11/06/2011 12:09 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified
On 11/06/2011 11:41 AM, John Harris wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Harrisjohnharri...@dodo.com.au
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original Message - - Original Message - From:
On 11/06/2011 12:49 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 11/06/2011 11:41 AM, John Harris wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Harrisjohnharri...@dodo.com.au
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original
On 11/06/2011 05:07 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 18:36, schrieb Peter Gluck:
What I wrote is connected to a subject more popular here these days.
The future is unknown, but perhaps it could be useful to )re) read the
play OXYGEN by Djerassi and Hoffman
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
the sort of conspiracy theory I've come to associate with SR hating
crackpots who think physicists are all brainwashed fools.
It's not necessary to be a brainwashed fool to be proved wrong. Or are
you implying that intelligence and education are synonymous with
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Maybe they just don't like the sun in their face?
They surely thought about this. From the abstract:
Because wind and light conditions could be excluded as a common
denominator determining the body axis orientation, magnetic alignment is
the most parsimonious
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Has any *real* news service reported on this?
I've seen a documentary about a boy that was meditating for months in
India inside a hollow tree, supposedly practically without food, and
certainly without moving for hours. They also mentioned this man.
I think it was
Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Has any *real* news service reported on this?
I've seen a documentary about a boy that was meditating for months in
India inside a hollow tree, supposedly practically without food, and
certainly without moving for hours. They also
On 06/03/2010 11:59 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
FYI,
My Google News on Cold Fusion brought me the following link:
Free Science Public Day Challenges Mainstream Ideas Including Einstein
and Bernoulli Theories
Excerpts:
Guest speakers include Ron Hatch on GPS without
I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks.
At this point it sounds like something intentional to me.
Don't they know about mechanical vices?
As they have access to the base of the leaking pipe, a powerful enough
mechanical vice can be used to slowly compress the
On 06/03/2010 07:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks.
At this point it sounds like something intentional to me.
That can't be! BP will lose billions of dollars. There is no way
anyone would cause
On 06/03/2010 08:22 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 06/03/2010 07:55 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote:
um, the pipe burst out. its a hollow column of rock.
Really? And what where they trying to cut some days ago?
what, where, when? were I meant
On 06/03/2010 09:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
I think that if they can cut it, they can certainly crunch it, and
keep
it pressed afterwards. But they should know better, isn't?
They should, and experts generally do
On 06/03/2010 10:50 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
. . .and a third part of the sea became blood.
Odd that this spill from deep water looks red.
Say, speaking of deepwater revelations - is the new BP well-cap one of the
seven bowls?
I
Hi Terry,
Except on a whimsical or comical note, I fail to see how and why the
possible sabotage of Foucault's pendulum relates to the much hyped end
of times.
On 06/05/2010 05:12 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Speaking of the Allais Eclipse Effect here is a web site with a good
summary of research
On 06/05/2010 10:52 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Wading through the references, I've found the following paper:
A theory of mass and gravity in 4-dimensional optics
(http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0109027)
Which lays
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum
Entanglement
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement
Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil
opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum
Entanglement
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement
Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil
opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be
On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400:
Hi,
I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two
*correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one
another.
That
At 08:16 PM 6/7/2010, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mailto:mix...@bigpond.commix...@bigpond.com
wrote:
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49
-0400:
Hi,
I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two
*correlated* particles
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:13:44
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Monday, June 07, 2010 6:51
PM
While two particles might share a common value for specific coordinate in
a
higher dimension, that doesn't mean that they are in
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:13:44
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Monday, June 07, 2010 6:51
PM
While two particles might share a common value for specific coordinate
in
a
higher dimension, that doesn't mean that they are
On 06/19/2010 01:40 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
First off, the fine structure constant isn't :-) meaning it is not really
constant, and supposedly has a value that must be determined
experimentally but never has - yet, there are many tantalizing natural
quantum relationship that get you
On 06/22/2010 12:21 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
The same things was reported by Argentina in the 1950's. The article
about this in the book Sun in a Bottle.
The inventor claims turned out to be a fake. He was using gunpowder
to initiate the reaction.
Hi,
As I'm actually living near the
On 06/23/2010 03:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
As I'm actually living near the city of Bariloche, which is on the
shore of the Nahuel Huapi lake in which Huemul island(Richter's
laboratory site) is, and as this can at least in a potential way be
related to cold fusion, I feel
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100707/full/news.2010.337.html
What is to say: a proton has a given size when measured against an
electron,
and a slighty different one when against a moun.
On 07/24/2010 01:39 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Thanks, interesting.
I started reading and I wonder what
/EM accelerating force (gravity)/
/frequencies of 7.07Hz, 14.14Hz, 21.21Hz and 28.28Hz/
means in document GravityPrst22.ppt page 16
I don't think I will read more before I have
to this question.
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 24, 2010 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Latest Gravity Research with AlienScientist
On 07/24/2010 01:39 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Thanks, interesting.
I started reading
be thought of as geometrical distortions of something it calls
spacetime, that is, that they affect not only matter but also light.
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 26, 2010 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Latest Gravity
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 07/24/2010 01:39 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Thanks, interesting.
I started reading and I wonder what
*EM accelerating force (gravity)*
*frequencies of 7.07Hz, 14.14Hz, 21.21Hz and 28.28Hz*
means in document
of the
hypothesis. I would also like to match the other datasets against these
velocities, but the other published graphs are not so clear as the bnl
graph is.
Best regards, and please let me know what you think.
Mauro Lacy
.
Best regards,
Mauro
On 08/31/2010 09:01 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Sirs,
I've read the preprints of your recent papers related to changes in
decay rates
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0924
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3318
In the first paper a number of possible systematic causes are checked
Rothwell wrote:
Mauro Lacy wrote:
More recent data, just reported to the author, indicate that *the
“24-hour” period is actually slightly shorter, and corresponds
quite precisely to a sidereal day!* The latter would suggest, that
*at least one astronomical factor influencing
On 09/04/2010 08:38 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
The X component of the distance ($3 in the graphs), and the Y
component of the velocity ($7 in the second graph), both closely
match the bnl decay rate changes.
After a careful orientation of the solar system inside the galaxy, I
realized that X
Hi,
The results of both papers are addressed, to a certain extent, in
Power Spectrum Analyses of Nuclear Decay Rates
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0924
Mauro
On 09/06/2010 02:31 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Here are two papers which find no evidence of periodic fluctuations in decay
rates. Both
On 09/08/2010 01:16 AM, Cosmo Manning wrote:
Hi,
I have been lurking and have to ask a burning question!
Mauro Lacy or anyone: in a hypothetical situation... Let's say for
instance that the earth was in near alignment with galactic central
point and then wobbled about it for a few days
It's been my observation that these planetary doomsday scenarios seem to
crop up every generation, every 23 years or so. I'm under the opinion that
some of these sociological events may in part be fueled by batches of
younger observers (initiates) who may not have had the opportunity to have
We don't need to do anything; we only have to
wait, and in a matter of weeks, or even days, all of our serious problems
will be magically swept away by a sequence of galactic waves of higher
frequency, that will automatically bring a new age to Earth.
Or, the other version: the world will be
On 09/08/2010 06:05 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
entering a new age of enlightenment, a new golden age. It is in that
sense that the concept of apocalipsis must be understood. Apocalypsis
meaning the rising of the veil..
As you can imagine, it's very important to understand the Apocalypsis
The short answer is, that I don't have a clear idea about how these
energies work with and interact with matter. I think that they are
related to velocity, to something equivalent to increased friction. By
the way, that could serve to give meaning and measurable qualities to
the much needed
I haven't been able to get a clarification to a vexing question
concerning Mercury's perihelion precession-al orbit, specifically the
angular direction such observations manifests as. For example,
hypothetically speaking here, let's pretend we have a space ship and
have stationed it
I haven't been able to get a clarification to a vexing question
concerning Mercury's perihelion precession-al orbit, specifically the
angular direction such observations manifests as. For example,
hypothetically speaking here, let's pretend we have a space ship and
have stationed it
Hi,
I'm in the same situation at the moment regarding the work of
Mathis. I've just found out about his, at least at first sight,
surprising and impressive body of work, when doing research to answer
your question.
Regarding your research: We talked here on vortex-l in the past about so
On 09/22/2010 07:47 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the same situation at the moment regarding the work of
Mathis. I've just found out about his, at least at first sight,
surprising and impressive body of work, when doing research to answer
your question.
Well, it's certainly
Insofar as what my own Celestial Mechanics research seems to indicate:
No elliptical orbits are stable. None. Strictly speaking, and in
Neutonian terms, using differential equations and feed-back
algorithms, my research indicates that eventually all elliptical orbits
will decay. By decay I mean
On 09/23/2010 05:39 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Mauro,
I agree that numerical/finite-based simulations can never model real
systems like our solar system in the absolute sense. At present I'm
certainly not trying to model such systems, at least not in the
strictest sense. The
On 10/08/2010 03:00 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
BTW, Mauro Lacy suggest googling Miles Mathis, for an entertaining
read on certain formulas used in regards to Celestial Mechanics. I've
waded through Mathis' article on Mercury's Precision. Lots of
interesting stuff
Hi,
It's in fact thanks to you that I discovered Mathis's work, when
researching your precession question. So I thank you, too.
He seems to be a kind of contemporary Newton, yes. I suppose he'll
perdure. Time will tell. I don't like his mechanistic ideas, although I
agree that it's convenient to
On 10/11/2010 01:50 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Hi again,
Today is a state-wide furlough day for most state of Wisconsin
employees, like me. ... How nice to have an extra holiday to explore
some of Mile's concepts. I'll rake the lawn later...
Regarding the
.
Regards,
Mauro Lacy
On 10/14/2010 06:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 14 Oct 2010
10:10:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
FYI,
A couple of days ago I sent a message off to Miles Mathis, mentioning
the fact that I just finished reading his
On 10/14/2010 08:06 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 10/11/2010 01:50 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
A question for you, Mauro:
I would nevertheless love to computer simulate a so-called authentic
elliptical orbit that is more accurately based on Miles' three-part
gravity model
. How to do it is left as an exercise for
the reader at the moment :-)
Mauro
On 10/16/2010 09:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 10/14/2010 08:06 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 10/11/2010 01:50 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
A question for you, Mauro:
I would nevertheless love
12 replies to my question is not bad but the integral is actually about
what
the gravity force is to a spherical mass distribution compared to a
point
mass. The so called center of gravity can not be used as a center of
gravity
since matter closer to a body attracts more than what the remote
Hi,
Yesterday I was reading the wikipedia entry for Newton's law of
universal gravitation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation,
and under Bodies with spatial extent it says:
If the bodies of question have spatial extent (rather than being
theoretical point masses),
On 10/24/2010 06:28 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mauro:
...
It is interesting to continue reading the explanation,
for the force exerted on points inside the sphere.
Indeed, I bet it does get interesting! In my own computer simulations, this
is where I've
On 10/24/2010 10:33 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
...
We'll probably never know for sure what forces are really exerted
inside a solid mass, due to the simple fact that bodies don't move
inside solids. Measurements of acceleration and velocity in the
gaseous giants, or in Venus's atmosphere, can
...
However, in the end I think that physics will want to keep up the
appearance
of verbal continuity is its description of fundamental particles, even if
they are non-particles.
...
It's not only a matter of verbal continuity. Five hundred years of
materialism will not dissappear with the
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
Are you saying that gravity behaves in the traditional (Newtonian) way
inside solid bodies? Do you have links or papers to experiments that
support this? As I said, there are reported anomalies inside boreholes.
How do you or others explain them?
Take into
On 11/27/2010 04:53 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:39:30 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Take into account that although gravity can be related to mass and
density, that is, it can have a dependency on mass and density, that
does not mean mass and
Jones, from where did you get those numbers? In this NASA article
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/17dec_solsticeeclipse/
they mention the year 1638, 372 years ago.
The discrepancy can be probably explained considering that's not so
straightforward to estimate the exact
Here's an open version of the same database:
http://www.hermit.org/Eclipse/when_search.shtml
I've downloaded the raw file, and after searching for total lunar
eclipses from Dec 19 to Dec 23, post Oct 15 1582(before that, Julian
dates are used), I've found the following solstice eclipse candidates:
On 12/19/2010 01:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Here's an open version of the same database:
http://www.hermit.org/Eclipse/when_search.shtml
I've downloaded the raw file, and after searching for total lunar
eclipses from Dec 19 to Dec 23, post Oct 15 1582(before that, Julian
dates are used), I've
On 12/19/2010 04:44 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 01:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Here's an open version of the same database:
http://www.hermit.org/Eclipse/when_search.shtml
I've downloaded the raw file, and after searching for total lunar
eclipses from Dec 19 to Dec 23, post Oct 15 1582
On 12/19/2010 05:01 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 04:44 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 01:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Here's an open version of the same database:
http://www.hermit.org/Eclipse/when_search.shtml
I've downloaded the raw file, and after searching for total lunar
On 12/20/2010 09:57 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 05:01 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 04:44 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 12/19/2010 01:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Here's an open version of the same database:
http://www.hermit.org/Eclipse/when_search.shtml
I've downloaded the raw file
On 12/26/2010 08:32 PM, francis wrote:
The fundamental Principle of the Conversion of Zero-point-energy of the
Vacuum
Claus W. Turtur (Fachbereich Elektrotechnik, University of Applied Sciences
Braunschweig-Wolfenbuettel)
Published in physic.philica.com
A well written article on the attempts to reconcile Quantum mechanics
with Special relativity, with a clear explanation of non-locality,
entanglement and Bell's theorem.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity
Some days ago I was able to read the whole
On 01/08/2011 08:09 AM, John Berry wrote:
It is a hacker from China (Beijing?) that hacked my gmail account.
How do you know that?
My password was random characters, but I have used the password before.
Still I wonder, I just before used a usb wifi device I just squired,
it was bough as
On 01/08/2011 09:29 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 01/08/2011 08:09 AM, John Berry wrote:
It is a hacker from China (Beijing?) that hacked my gmail account.
How do you know that?
My password was random characters, but I have used the password before.
Still I wonder, I just before used a usb wifi
We've have talked in the past about entanglement understood as an
hyperdimensional connection.
According to this paper on Efimov states, Topologist Predicts New Form
of Matter (http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26144/)
The deep and unworldly link between particles in Efimov states is
On 01/11/2011 04:43 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Yes, under effects of centripetal acceleration which is by the way
an erroneous title since it should be centrifugal acceleration.
Don't think so. In Newtonian terms, the acceleration's centripetal,
caused by the centripetal force, which is
On 01/12/2011 07:38 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
I have derived an effect which differs from Newton/Kepler orbits but
with the wrong sign apparently increasing the problem even more.
I would be glad if someone could check the calculations before I take
them further. It would also be nice to
On 01/12/2011 08:25 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 01/12/2011 07:38 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
I have derived an effect which differs from Newton/Kepler orbits but
with the wrong sign
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
