I have opened a bug about this issue (#1556190).
I see its still open so i guess you can close it.
Thanks,
Tomer
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Ah, cool.
Eelco
On 9/13/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i think its already been fixed
action type=fix dev=Matej Knopp
On 9/14/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://jroller.com/page/dashorst?entry=wicket_goodie_hibernate_versioned_form(BTW Frank: woogle didn't find this article!)
Hmm, I'm not sure how to fetch that with woogle. How would a normal user find the article? I can't find any archive, back
Hey,
I have to agree with Gavin: the book is indeed a bit rough.
For example, the auther takes loads of time to elaborate certain
'features' while others are being handled as if he expects the audience
to know what he is talking about.
The examples are imo completely useless in real life since
By the way:
There is a very nice introduction to Wicket 2.0 in the last chapters of
the book - I cannot wait to play around with that baby... :)
//Che
__
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message is intended for the addressee(s) or authorized
recipient only. If you are not the
Great ! A whole book.
But does it cover Wicket 1.2 or 1.1 ?
Regards,
Thomas
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
It covers 1.2 and has a small part about what will change in 2.0. I can recommend the book, it's a very good starting point./Per14 sep 2006 kl. 09.32 skrev Thomas Queste:Great ! A whole book.But does it cover Wicket 1.2 or 1.1
I used thunderbird as mail client, and reading the user list was taking a lot of time. It was hard to follow the discussions, and don't get me started about getting back from 3 weeks of beach leisure. When I got to gmail, my mailinglist reading went down to 10% of the time it used to take. You can
I used the google, but knew what to look for (as I wrote it). But even I don't know everything I put on that blog by memory.I'd have to digg into roller's code to see how to publish the full list under an url. But no time for that unfortunately.
MartijnOn 9/14/06, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no restriction on what to do on wicket stuff, as long as it is Wicket related and helps our community. I think both criteria are met: shades is for the greater good of the Java community at large and creating a demo project to utilize it with Wicket is a good showcase of what it can do.
Thanks Martijn, Your implementation is inspiring. I will rewrite mine
following your example. Merging adds some problems in itself, and some
more if you want to be smart to the user when some field conflict. There
even is a problem when no fields conflict because the resulting record
might not
Yes, that's what I am doing. I will then store the objects in the
session and later add support for storing them in a temp table if needded.
In case the objects are to be saved in the database, what would be the
best approach? I the same table as the actual object (needs one more
field to
Geoff,
the SVN doesn't seem to be up to date. E.g. ImmutableQuery cannot be
resolved to a type
Juergen
On 9/14/06, Geoff hendrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yo yo yo,
So I've got a decent build of Shades up on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/shadesdb
I've incorporated some of
..
int c = 0;
..
List columns = new ArrayList();
columns.add(new AbstractColumn(new Model(操作)){
public void populateItem(Item cellItem, String
componentId, IModel
model){
c +=
Because the cellItems are the column items...
You only have one column, so it will always return 0 (first column).
Martijn
On 9/14/06, wq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
int c = 0;
..
List columns = new ArrayList();
columns.add(new
List columns = new ArrayList();
columns.add(new AbstractColumn(new Model(操作)){
public void populateItem(Item cellItem, String
componentId, IModel
model){
rowIndex += cellItem.getIndex()+ 1;
But also for input in the wicket side??convertInput(),getInput(),getConvertedInput,validate name themAren't really meant for a button as far as i know.johanOn 9/13/06,
Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the reason that a button is a formcomponent is because abutton can receive
Modal window width and height is stored in a cookie. First time initial
width and height is used, and after that the width and height from the
cookie is used.
What you need to do is set different cookie id for different modal
windows. Or disable cookies at all (setCookieId(null)).
-Matej
Hi.
I keep getting:
WicketMessage: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependent
objects implement Serializable. Class: ...
...
I am using wicket 1.2.2 - when I roll back to an earlier version of
1.2 (checked out from main trunk in february) - the problem is gone
and everything
ensure your dependent objects implement serializable (important for replication across server clusters) or else use transient keywordOn 9/14/06, Christian Hvid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.I keep getting:WicketMessage: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependentobjects implement
On 13.9.2006, at 17.58, Manuel Barzi wrote:
But, what about that webapp - based on WebPage - to be integrated in a
portlet by means of PortletPage?
I mean, does PortletPage offer the same flexibility WebPage does? I
guess we'll find some limitations, have to test yet, but all
information
Maybe this helps:http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/FAQs#I_get_.27Internal_error_cloning_object.27_errors
2006/9/14, Christian Hvid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.I keep getting:WicketMessage: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependentobjects implement Serializable. Class: ..I am
It helped.
Thank you.
On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:00, Dirk Markert wrote:
Maybe this helps:
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/FAQs#I_get_.
27Internal_error_cloning_object.27_errors
2006/9/14, Christian Hvid [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi.
I keep getting:
WicketMessage: Internal error
AR, you're right, I forgot to do a SVN add. I just
committed. ImmutableQuery should be in the
shades-0.0.3.zip download, however. I will add it
tonight.
-geoff
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:03:35 +0200
From: Juergen Donnerstag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] shades
Hi Karthik,
I totally agree with you: it is almost impossible to write something
that everybody likes.
It might well be that most other readers love the book and find it
absolutely perfekt to learn Wicket. I think it depends a lot on what you
expect, what you previous experience is and how much
now i am curious what your fix was that you did.Disable the check? That would be the wrong fix.On 9/14/06, Christian Hvid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It helped.Thank you.On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:00, Dirk Markert wrote:
Maybe this helps: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/FAQs#I_get_.
This book was (and still is) a very valuable help to me. I did not read
it cover to cover, although I should have. (I wish I had enough time for
this !). It's a very good introductory book, the kind that gives the
best value for the time you spend reading it. In a perfect world, it
would have
There is always this thing called expectations.
This is the first book written for those who want to get up to speed with
Wicket and I find it extremely to the point.
Funny, but I have dramatically oppossite comments after reading this book.
I like it very much and I find it extremely important
It was hard to follow the discussions
Just curious... why?
This (complicated on purpose) picture shows:
a) a visited thread with an unread message
b) a totally unread thread
c) a totally read and closed (for me) thread
d) an important (for me) visited thread with an unread message inside (I
Agree with Gustavo, Thunderbird is without question a great
thread-oriented mail client, and it's for free. Moreover, you can
carry it all in your memory stick, as achieved with this version:
http://portableapps.com/portablethunderbird
;)
Yes, but you have to open each individual message inside the thread.
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.
Martijn
On 9/14/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agree with Gustavo, Thunderbird is without question a great
thread-oriented mail
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.
That's a good proposal to forward to Mozilla Thunderbird ORG
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
maybe add shades into wicket-phonebook, it already supports hibernate and ibatis.-IgorOn 9/14/06, middledot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thanks Goeff,By your own admission Shades owns it to Wicket so it would be nice if this
special relationship was maintained. I think it would be great if you put
Thanks. That was helpful, but it seems to be more difficult than it needs to
be. I think the default behaviour should have been to use different cookie
names per instance of the modal window, but apparently the same cookie name
were used for all instances. I tried to use getClassRelativePath()
And as I stated in my last email, I personally do notlike the way of saying 'Let's do it like this!' and then a chapter later
you revoke it all because it can be done quicker and cleanerdifferently. for an introductory book i do not think this is all that bad actually. you are learning the api.
he can always try both seeing how they are both free. even try them in parallel.-IgorOn 9/14/06, Manuel Barzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.That's a good proposal to forward to Mozilla Thunderbird
but you have to open each individual message inside the thread.
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling
my mousewheel.
This is really a good point.
You loose the conversation this way (i.e. who is answering who) but I
think is better for you, being on the
maybe add shades into wicket-phonebook, it already supports hibernate
and ibatis.
I'd like this.
-
Gustavo.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with
I would like to use Ajax to validate my form. I've tried using AjaxFormValidatingBehavior but it always will call my Form#onSubmit() method when data contains no validation error. How to validate a form without invoking the form submit method?
Thanks for helping Paolo
form submit is necessary to validate the form.what i usually do is put any logic into my buttons and not into form's onsubmit.-IgorOn 9/14/06,
Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to use Ajax to validate my form. I've tried using AjaxFormValidatingBehavior but it always will
I'll think about it. The behavior you have suggested might be the right
default behavior. Would you please be so kind as to fill a feature
request so that I won't forget about it?
Thanks.
-Matej
samyem wrote:
Thanks. That was helpful, but it seems to be more difficult than it needs to
be. I
OK, but if it is so which is the difference between AjaxFormSubmitBehavior and AjaxFormValidatingBehavior? Thanks, PaoloOn 9/14/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
form submit is necessary to validate the form.what i usually do is put any logic into my buttons and not into form's
/*** Ajax event behavior that submits the form and updates all form feedback* panels on the page. Useful for providing instant feedback.
*-IgorOn 9/14/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but if it is so which is the difference between AjaxFormSubmitBehavior and
Hi I am using datePicker the same way as it is shown in forminput example.
but i need to position the bottom of popup at top edge of my textfield.
i tried using
DatePickerSettings dps = new DatePickerSettings();
dps.setAlign(T);
add(new DatePicker(abc,New TextField(a,Date.class),dps))
it
43 matches
Mail list logo
