Then
https://www.webelements.com/silicon/crystal_structure.html
is wrong !
Before you start calculations you should know the crystal structure very well
and you should know about symmetry and space groups.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the prob
changed. If is make it primitive, it will be ok or not?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Fecher, Gerhard
mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
Then
https://www.webelements.com/silicon/crystal_structure.html
is wrong !
Before you start calculations you should know the crystal structure very
Gavin you are right,
I still use it as an example on how to make Si a metal.
Seems nowadys symmetry is not teached anymore :-((
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what th
I am not guru, not even Känguru
I just tested the compilation of dstart in the NCM Version of Wien2k,
1) it has no problem (it was freshly unzipped from the tar.gz, only the
Makefile was changed to my compilersettings)
2) and cputim.c is correctly compiled to cputim.o.
I used ifort 11.1.080
seems to make troubles starting from Version 13 of ifort,
either
1) remove module.o from OBJS1 = .., in case you ever like to use make
-check
or
2) remove it from PREOBJS
1) works at least with ifort 11 correctly
and the warning message
"make: Zirkuläre Datei module.o <- module.o Abhä
did you check that the file
case.dos1dn, case.dos1evdn, case.dosvup, and case. dos1evup
are ok ? can you use them to plot the DOS ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what
The assumption that a apple is not a sphere
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut
Dear Bramhachari,
It seems this is an issue of the ifort 13 compiler,
I don't have the problem with the 11 version that i used a long time ago, but
only with 13 (actually I don't have other versions installed, unfortunately)
I did not find fast where the problem is located, maybe you can use a ne
Dear Subhasis
I have the same problem when using ifort 13.x.x but not with 11.x.x
try a newer version of the compiler
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question
Boy you are boring,
No one knows what you did in particular, so how can anyone answer ?
and not everyone likes to work for you at Sunday
Do what Laurence suggested: Why do you have in the first cycle of your
attached file 496 electrons and later only 96 ? Did you check that ?
Ciao
Gerha
Does the structure have inversion symmetry or is it a complex calculation ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Please check
P.J. Webster and K.R.A. Ziebeck in Landolt-Börnstein III/19C; Springer Verlag,
(1988)
1.5.5.1.2 Heusler alloys: Magnetic order
page 86 chapter 1.5.5.1.2.2 Antiferromagnetic order
it describes the different possibilities of antiferromagnetic order in Heusler
compounds
(I guess this
I guess something is wrong with your structure
there should be no afm setup of "full" Heusler compounds (starting from F m-3m
with 4 atoms in the primitive cell) that ends up in space group 113 (this one
may appear for so called "half" Heusler compounds starting from space group F
-43m with 3 at
ld: cannot find -lmkl_scalapack_lp64
means that the linker cannot find a library, please check your setup of the
frortran compiler and mkl
and check your envronment variables: LD_LIBRARY_PATH
with siteconfig_lapw check the settings for: LDFLAGS, R_LIBS, and RP_LIBS
the path should be everywhere t
for AFM you should have 2 different MMI with opposite sign and the total moment
has to vanish.
e.g.:
--- MMT ---
:MMTOT: SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL =-0.1
--- atom dependend parameter MMI ---
:MMI001: MAGNETIC MOMENT IN SPHERE 1=1.39907
...
:MMI002: MAGNETIC
use XCrysden to create your own path in k-space for the bandstructure plot
go to the Bilbao crystallographic server to see the Brillouin zone for your
space group
follow the steps suggested by W2WEB
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, t
Maybe it is just the number of electrons in the occupied bands that are
analysed,
there may be some more "valence" bands below the energy window
you can check it from the DOS by integrating it only from the bottom of the
energy window up to the Fermi energy
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adam
Please be sure to read AND understand
Hauss{\"u}hl, S. (2007) Physical Properties of Crystals Wiley
Nye, J. F. (1985) Physical Properties of Crystals Oxford University press
and then have a look at
G V Sinko, N A Smirnov J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 6989
S QWang, H Q Ye, S Yip J. Phys.: C
select 1 k-point (Gamma point)
and use irrep
see the manual for the correct switches
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
===
I guess that for the "topological" characterisation you need the irreducible
representation
of the bands and not just their number
e.g.: Gamma 6 (G6) means you have a e1/2 band, etc. see below
In the output of irrep you will find something like:
The point group is Td
24 symmetry
This is a type of textbook question, that means the complete answer takes more
than one textbook
it will depend on how much you know about electronic structure, symmetry and
group theory, as well as topology.
In the forum one can answer how to do things or comment on small questions,
however,
w
the answer is 42, see reference given below
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut
I guess you like to calculate the Seebeck coefficient of some materials based
the electronic structure calculated by Wien2k ,
therefore, please check the program Boltztrap.
Xou will find it on the "Unsupported software goodies " page:
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/unsupported/
Next time, please
Why is AFM type II of an fcc system geometrically frustrated ?
I guess you have something else in mind, because the type II AFM is clearly
defined, isn't it.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you hav
userguide page 113
?? 0.1. Bext in T ?? dot
after 1 ??
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
=
Nota bene: an vacuum induction field of approximately 0.23 T will give about
10^-6 Ry/mu_B (1 microRydberg per Bohr magneton)
My guess is, at 0.1 T nothing in the calculation will change at all and from
experience I can tell that this is true.
I am not even sure whether this is enough to force
I tried it once for Pt and it worked
most probably there is an error in one of the input files inorb, indm, inso, or
wherever else
(maybe "c" versions of the input files are needed, or the m-directions are not
consistent).
I don't remember any conflict between initso and inorb.
Ciao
Gerhard
It seems the hexagonal structure is from a 1962 publication (some journal where
I do not have acceess)
there is a much more recent determination from 1999 (ZAAC 625 page 2050) by Ruck
that tells it is a much more complicated structure in space group F 1 2/m 1
(no. 12)
the XRD pattern for both str
> ---
> Dr. Martin Pieper
> Karl-Franzens University
> Institute of Physics
> Universitätsplatz 5
> A-8010 Graz
> Austria
> Tel.: +43-(0)316-380-8564
>
>
>
> Am 09.11.2015 08:51, schrieb Fecher, Gerhard:
>>
>> I tried it once for Pt and it worked
>&g
atibilities between SO and external field at the time.
>>
>> Keep fingers crossed that it checks out with an input file error
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Dr. Martin Pieper
>> Karl-Franzens University
>> Institute of Physics
>> Uni
It is not clear why you like to deal with core electrons (3s, 3p) as valence
states ?
by the way, isn't it [Ar] 4s2 4p2 and you suggest something like [Ne] 3s2 3p6
3d10 4s2 4p2
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest wit
why don't you just copy the xcrysden.klist to your actual case after you
produced it once
(in similar way you may replace the existing predefined cases)
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have ne
7 meV or do you mean 7 mRy ?
Everything stays speculation without knowing to the d electrons of what kind of
atoms you apply the U
you should tell what you try to do or is it that secret
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite h
We changed the Fortran code to handle both spin channels at once, to have the
output for our needs,
and to handle the chemical potential correctly, it needs to change with
temperature the same way for both spin channels, otherwise the compound would
charge itself at T>0
(it might be that the beh
The lines connecting the atoms are to visualize the structure, they don't have
much to do with real bonds
change the bond parameters in XCrysden for your needs !
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that yo
you applied a tetragonal distortion along x
but how did you manage that you still have 48 symmetry operations ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
optimized structure and
increased a by a0*1.001 and decreased b & c by keeping lattice type F. Then run
init_lapw -b.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Fecher, Gerhard
mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
you applied a tetragonal distortion along x
but how did you manage that you st
Did you check how the Brillouin zone looks like in the tetragonal case after
you applied the strain ?
Is your k-path that you used for the xmgrace plot the one that you like to have
to find the correct gap ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the p
Please read and understand the literature on elastic constants and their
calculation by ab-initio calculations
afterwards you may try the programs found in the "Unsupported software goodies"
section of Wien2k, or the ones that come with Wien2k
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhiker
g list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] Correct band gap value
It looks same (in shape). I selected lattice type F and applied strain. Only
symmetry operations reduce to 16 from 48 (for bulk Si). Also I kept the volume
constant for every value of strain.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:29
Dear Peter,
I am curious -- not only just because of the previous discussion -- whether
there are any plans to implement forces with SO
More interesting, the problem might also come up if calculating phonons for
high Z materials, or indeed, in their structural optimizatiuon if free
parameters e
Did you change only the position ? That might be the cause of your troubles.
you also need to have the correct symmetry (space group) for the new structure
!
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you ha
The series of subroutines is easy,
The main program is obviously mini
this calls haupt
How much do you know about Fortran ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what t
May be it is off-topic, but what is the physics behind mBJ+U ?
or is that just a question on why a feature of Wien2k does not work as expected
?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actua
do you have a band gap in one spin direction (halfmetallic ferromagnet ?)
In that case i sometimes observe the same already with GGA
I guess it appears because of the mixing of the spin up and spin down
wavefunctions when using SO, the states may not longer have a pure up/dn spin
character.
The
why do you expect that the Seebeck is symmetric arround zero chemical potential
(whatever you assume to be the Zero)
is your density of states symmetric with respect to the middle of the band gap ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to b
Hallo Hannan,
there seems to be a big confusion about the terms Fermi energy and chemical
potential
(unfortunately sometimes this happens already in text books)
What quantity do you call "Fermi energy", "chemical potential", or most
undefined "Femi level" ?
Fermi energy is by definition the ene
Did you read a good textbook on the subject ?
For example
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
by
Richard M. Martin, published by Cambridge University Press, 2004
see also http://electronicstructure.org/
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
Your question " am I right to assume that for this material I don’t need
to consider spin-polarization?"
causes several questions:
Why do you expect at all that you might need a spinpolarized calculation for
GaN ?
What do you expect from a spinpolarized calculation for a material that has
Maybe you find something useful in:
Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol. 85 Solid Surface Physics (1979)
J. HöIzl F.K.Schulte "Work Function of Metals"
It should be available online as pdf
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be qui
I don't understand the question,
what do you like to know, \zeta (proportional to 1/r dV/dr) for each atom or
the orbital moment (m_l) for each atom ?
The r dependence tells you already that there is no single value for 'zeta =
zeta(r)'
SO is calculated directly from dV/dr which is not printed s
erman
Dr. German D Samolyuk
Materials Theory Group
Materials Science & Technology Division
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Post Office Box 2008
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6138
(865) 241-5394
(865) 241-3650 (FAX)
________
From: Wien on behalf of Fecher,
Gerhard
Sent: Thursday, Aug
Dear Peter,
I have a question about the units of the density when preparing 3d density plots
with prepare_xsf_lapw or 3ddens. For tests, I summed up the densities on a 201^3
mesh taken from the produced xsf files and received very different results.
(see below). Indeed, I did not expect absolutely
e standard e/bohr^3. this explains also the factor you
noticed of 6.7 ~= 1. / .529177^3
PS: prepare_xsf is "obsolete". 3Ddens is orders of magnitude faster ...
PPs: I'll take over your suggestion of deleting empty files with clean_lapw
Best regards
Peter
Am 29.08.2023 um 08:5
Dear Peter,
I have an issue with save_lapw (Wien2k 23.2) when calling it from w2web after a
parallel calculation.
using -d savedir (by checking the box: Save calculation in a directory as
specified) results in
save_lapw -d -eels savedir
this does not happen for a non-parallel calculation.
It
lculation, there is no case.output1, but
only a output1_1. So at least this file needs to be kept.
I also will remove all empty files.
I'll send the new version to your private email for further testing
before release.
Best regards
Peter
Am 05.09.2023 um 12:06 schrieb Fecher, Gerhard:
&
I get no error
I just calculated the band structure of Fe bcc using the non-collinear
WIEN2kNCM code without any problems !
copy or make a case.klist_band file
run lapw1 -band(note: ncm has only
lapw1c)
make a case.insp input file
run spaghetti
Note1: It
Not to forget: where is the structure coming from ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
I
Dear Lukasz
you didn't tell which scattering program, is it similar to the one of Francesc
Salvat and Ricardo Mayol (Computer Physics Communications 74 (1993) 358) ?
There is a subroutine (VCALC) in Salvats code that "creates" muffin tin
potentials from the atomic potential.
If you like to use p
Hallo Peter,
I observed some unexpected (maybe strange) behaviour of lapw1 (Wien2k Version
23.2 compiled with OneAPI 23.1)
I wanted to test if there is a ferro- or antiferromagnetic coupling in MnGa4
1) I started with the regular structure (just spin polarized) I m-3m 1 Mn atom
4 Ga atoms (MnGa
move this additional check, it runs through and the eigenvalues
look reasonable (and for k-vectors which run through, the eigenvalues
are identical (although the K attachments are different).
You may want to test this version.
Regards
Peter
Am 28.01.2024 um 12:20 sch
n=3 l=2 is not the M_2,3 absorption edge,
please check a textbook on the notation of the X-ray absorption edges
(3d states of Fe are in the valence band anyway !)
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that yo
did you see the occupancies, then you should know whether the orbital with or
without star (*) belongs to the spin-orbit split j=l+1/2 and j=l-1/2 orbitals
p_1/2 p_3/2
d_3/2 d_5/2
f
but it is also clear from the energies, isn't it.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide t
where is your structure from ?
if you have a cif file, transform the structure to P1 maybe on the Bilbao
crytallographic server (take care on the relevant digits) and let the Wien2k
initialisation do the job for you
check the structure in the structure editor after you accepted the one found by
For the first part of your question "touch":
touch is a Linux command and not one of Wien2k ==> at the command line >
touch --helpor > info touch
for the second part ".lcore":
.lcore is a (hidden , notice the dot in front) file used by Wien2k if present
==> search the manual for .lcor
Like usual:
Check you’re structure,are the lattice parameters ok and the positions
given in the correct coordinates ?
Change the RMTs, where are they coming from ?
Decrease energy to separate core and valence, which value did you use ?
are the Zn 3p in the core ?
Search
next is dstart
> dstart -c -p > & .mist (16:33:05) running dstart in single mode
C T F
DSTART ENDS
0.646u 0.008s 0:00.17 376.4% 0+0k 0+1296io 0pf+0w
-> new ZnO.in0 generated
init_lapw finished ok
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 15:50, Fecher, Gerhard wrote:
>
> Like usual:
&g
LAPW1 END
> > LAPW2 END
> > CORE END
> > ERROR: NEC01 charge leakage too large
> >
> > Is there something else that I should be doing in the setup?
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 15:50, Fecher, Gerhard wrote:
> >>
> >> Like usual:
&
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von Chithra M
Mathew [chithr...@nirmalagiricollege.ac.in]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juni 2024 06:32
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] Charge leakage too large
@Fecher, Gerhard
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 20:13, Fecher, Gerhard wrote:
>
>
1 1
in cycle 8ETEST: .00069865 CTEST: .0065417 STRTEST: 0
STOP LAPW0 END
STOP LAPW1 END
STOP LAPW2 END
STOP CORE END
STOP DSTART ENDS
STOP MIXER END
ec cc fc and str_conv 1 1 1 1
> stop
On 6/13/2024 10:32 PM, Chithra M Mathew wrote:
> @Fecher, Gerhard
>
> On Tue, 11
10:33
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] Charge leakage too large
Hi Fecher, Gerhard
I tried both structeditor RMT suggestion structure and the reported values.
But still
LAPW0 END
LAPW1 END
LAPW2 END
CORE END
ERROR: NEC01 charge leakage too large
On Fri, 14 Jun 2
Maybe no one answered so far as no one understands your questions ?
From the energy in 1., I guess you like to investigate the M5,4 edges, that is
you excite an electron from
the 3d5/2 and/or 3d3/2 core levels into unoccupied states (just above the
Fermie energy).
You find the binding energies i
Hallo Peter or anyone else who has an idea,
I have a "problem" in the NCM Version, I need to reduce RKmax down to 4.0,
otherwise I receive segmentation faults from lapw1.
(probably during allocation or reallocation in modules.F, INIT_MATRICES)
I needed to set NMATMAX = 128 000 that RKmax=4.0 work
Hi Burhan,
what makes you sure that a gap exists ?
You do not tell much details, must be very secret.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
==
Why runsp_lapw, isn't SnSe2 a semiconductor without magnetic order and a
non-spinpolarized calculation is just fine ?
According to Pearsons Crystal Database from 2022, SnSe2 should crystallize in P
-3m1 (no. 164),
in its crystal class -3m (also for 3m, 32) one has 6 independent elastic
constan
fit
is 4. My query which output among those three should be considered?
with regards,
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 13:37, Fecher, Gerhard
mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
Why runsp_lapw, isn't SnSe2 a semiconductor without magnetic order and a
non-spinpolarized calculation is just fine ?
You just did not read and understand my e-mail
c66 = (c11-c12)/2 in hexagonal structures
the required coefficent c14 for the C6 (CdI2) structure is not calculated by
IRElast !!
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with
I strongly recomment to read and understand the original thesis of
Rostam Golesorkhtabar (Leoben, April 2013) also published in CPC 184 (2013) 1861
from the group of Claudia Ambrosch–Draxl
that explains for the ElastiC code in much detail about the parameters,
symmetry, and the effect of the size
Dear Morteza
It is interesting that your paper J All Comp 735 (2018) 569-579 gives the
correct answer for trigonal compounds namely 6 cij for the present case,
but IRElast does not make use of it !
Your answer
"Hexagonal compounds have five independent elastic constants (C66=(c11-c12)/2)"
does n
Hallo Lukasz,
If you edit the structure (or create a new one) and use sgroup afterwards then
it will resort the equivalent sites again when you accept the structure.
If the space group was already ok, then you do not need to accept changes made
by sgroup.
I do not know whether there exists an IU
you mention
"I didn't find any compile.msg file from any of SRC_* folder.."
seems you did not compile the programs.
did you run all steps for the installation on
"http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/wien2k_download/"; correctly
Did you run the siteconfig_lapw as described in the manual ? D
Dear Lyudmila,
that's a strange remark,
it means, if I change the structure and the type of atoms the result becomes
different,
but it means nothing if I don't know the structure and the elements
I also wonder what " ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic elements" should be
and why you have a ferromagn
gen_lapw)
Please show me if this is wrong
Thank you
Shayam
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 4:14 AM, "Fecher, Gerhard"
mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
Dear Lyudmila,
that's a strange remark,
it means, if I change the structure and the type of atoms the result become
please read
Y. Yun et al; Phys Rev B 83 , 075109 (2011)
the authors found a ferromagnetic state for alpha U3O8 with moment at only one
of the U atoms,
however, they also remarked that experiments resultes always in a paramagnetic
state.
However this was for a particular structure of U3O8, and th
Dear Viktor,
what magnetic order are you assuming at the start ?
I remember that afm with Nd1 (0,0,0) up and Nd2 (1/3,2/3,1/4) dn was converging
but there was always a small difference in the magnetic moments even with FSM
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
Please read
Ph. Mavropoulos, I. Galanakis, V. Popescu., P. H. Dederichs
The influence of spin–orbit coupling on the band gap of Heusler alloys
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 (2004) S5759
or in more detail the book C. Felser, G.H. Fecher (Eds.); Spintronics; Springer
Verlag (2013)
Ciao
Gerhard
DEE
I strongly disagree,
a semi-metal (not to be confused with a half-metall) is a material that is
insulating (semiconducting) in one direction and conducting in another one, a
typical example is graphite.
(this has nothing to do whether the bands are flat or not;
and just to mention, the density of
e high DOS? Not always, for example NaCl at the bottom of the
conduction band, the band is flat and DOS is very low
And I do not think I need a high density of k points
On the other hand the f orbitals have flat bands and DO HAVE high DOS
De: Wien en nombre de
ty may be a concomitant feature, however, it is not necessary.
Cheers,
Karel
--- x ---
dr. Karel Vyborny
Fyzikalni ustav AV CR, v.v.i.
Cukrovarnicka 10
Praha 6, CZ-16253
tel: +420220318459
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Fecher, Gerhard wrote:
> Thank you for the Link, but I don't understand your
assume you use
metalloids for these.
Incidentally the IUPAC gold book does not define semimetal, semi-metal or
metalloid.
Elaine A. Moore
From: Wien on behalf of Fecher,
Gerhard
Sent: 30 January 2019 09:17
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: Re: [Wien] Met
and structure is quite different than the DOS. Here I have
attached both the figures. I would like to know whether it is possible to get
this kind of difference in SOC calculations or not?
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 14:55, Fecher, Gerhard
mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>> wrote:
Please read
Ph. Mav
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/augmented
==> increased in number, amount or strength.
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
It just means that the ferromagnetic state is not stable,
the solutions for the ferrimagnetic state are identical, besides the signs of
the magnetic moments (what doesn't matter).
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest wit
Does == work ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical C
t;) and .NEQV. ("not equivalent to"). So the above test
would be properly written as:
IF (LOGVAL1 .EQV. LOGVAL2) ..."
On 6/25/2019 3:14 PM, Fecher, Gerhard wrote:
Does == work ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
&quo
Dear who ever you are,
it seems you do not know what you are doing:
you are talking in one e-mail about Nd (Neodymium) and in another one about Nb
(Niobium), so what ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is th
Dear Min Lin,
to flip the spin of a particular atom
first use
==> 3.“label” an atom (put a 1 in the 3rd column next to the element name) to
make this atom unique (needed eg. for core-holes)
(maybe you need to create first a P1 cell to have individual access to all
atoms in the cell, but this yo
Dear Peter or someone else who has a solution,
where can I find the number of iterations that is printed in the case.scf, for
example
:ITE983:983. ITERATION
it seems this number is somewhere stored from previous scf cycles and then used
when a calculation is retarted or continued (probably with
Am 20.09.2019 um 08:13 schrieb Fecher, Gerhard:
> Dear Peter or someone else who has a solution,
> where can I find the number of iterations that is printed in the case.scf,
> for example
> :ITE983:983. ITERATION
>
> it seems this number is somewhere stored from previous scf cycl
Dear Bahmu,
there are no changes in SRC_elast since 2013 (most are from 2002 !) that is, it
should not matter which version one uses (supposed they are compiled correctly)
***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE DPOLFT IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
shows that a problem in anaelast appears when trying to fit the data for te
301 - 400 of 455 matches
Mail list logo